0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views5 pages

Case Analysis

The bottleneck in the clinic process is the x-ray imaging and development step, which has a utilization of 91%. This high utilization means it has the lowest capacity to handle the incoming patient load. The clinic sees on average 80 patients per day, of which 60% are follow-up cases and 40% are new patients. Various recommendations are provided to improve throughput, such as reducing the processing time at the x-ray step to decrease waiting times.

Uploaded by

PG
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views5 pages

Case Analysis

The bottleneck in the clinic process is the x-ray imaging and development step, which has a utilization of 91%. This high utilization means it has the lowest capacity to handle the incoming patient load. The clinic sees on average 80 patients per day, of which 60% are follow-up cases and 40% are new patients. Various recommendations are provided to improve throughput, such as reducing the processing time at the x-ray step to decrease waiting times.

Uploaded by

PG
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

CASE QUESTIONS:

1 Where is the bottleneck in the process? What are the capacity constraints at the clinic?
2 How does the process perform in terms of throughput, flow time and inventory?
3 How is variability affecting the clinic and how can it be controlled?
4 What would you recommend to improve the process and why?
UTILIZATION & BOTTLENECK COMPUTATION
* Highest utilization = Bottleneck we only have to identify one

Patients coming in everday 80


Follow-up 60% 48 `------------------>

New 40% 32 `------------------>

Staff Availability

1 Front Desk
a Registration 3 clerks 8:30 am to 11:30 am
b Verification 3 nurses 8:30 am to 12:45 pm

2 Radiology Department
a X-ray imaging 6 technicians 8:30 am to 12:30 am
b Development of x-ray By machine 8:30 am to 12:30 am
c Diagnostic reading and comments 3 radiologists 8:30 am to 12:30 am

3 Hand-off to x-ray to clinic


a Collection of x-ray 3 same 3 nurses 8:30 am to 12:45 pm
b Direct patients/filing/exam room prep 1 nurse 8:45 am to 01:00 pm

4 Examination room
1 surgeon 8:45 am to 01:00 pm
*only one works at a time 2 senior residents 8:45 am to 01:00 pm
1 cast technician 8:45 am to 01:00 pm

Findings:
1 The two highest utilizations are -
X-ray imaging and development at 91%
Cast technician at 94%
Surgeon 111%
2 So now we use a second analysis to choose between these two - which is the impact analysis
X-ray imaging and development has the highest possibility of time reduction
So we go with this bottleneck and suggest improvements

Robin - comments at P20 and P29


Total X-ray required 73 Treated By
X-ray required 85% 41 Surgeon
X-ray not required 15% 7 Senior Resident
Cast Technician

X-ray required 100% 32 Surgeon


Cast Technician

Process Time as per Staff Estimate Number of Patients


Total Time
Time Available per
Available (in New Patient Follow-up Patient New Patient
person (in minutes)
minutes)
14 9
180 540 5 5 32
255 765 9 4 32

23 23
240 1440 11 11 32
7 7 32
240 720 5 5 32

4 4
255 765 2 2 32
255 255 2 2 32

24 20
255 255 7 4 32
255 255 0 7 0
255 255 17 13 8

impact analysis
30% 15
70% 33
15% 8

100% 32
25% 8

Number of Patients Actual Output (in terms of time taken to complete activity)
Utilization = Actual
Follow-up Patient New Patient Follow-up Patient Total Output / Maximum
Potential

48 160 240 400 74%


48 288 192 626 82%

41 352 451 803 91%


41 224 287 511 part of imaging above
41 160 205 365 51%

41 64 82 same 3 nurses
48 64 96 160 63%

15 224 60 284 111%


33 0 231 231 91%
8 136 104 240 94%
Total Waiting Time as per Patient Estimate Possible Time Reduction

New Patient Follow-up Patient SD New Patient Follow-up Patient

30 25 4 16 16

58 58 22 35 35

3 3 2 -1 -1

38 33 19 14 13

You might also like