Scribd
Upload
38 views2 pages

Question 1. Prove The Reduction Formula: Example: Section 7.1: Integration by Parts

This document provides a proof of the reduction formula for integrating sin^n x using integration by parts. It begins by stating the formula to be proved and the strategy of using integration by parts. It then performs the integration by parts twice, first in a way that complicates the integrand, then in a way that isolates the trig functions. Some algebraic manipulations are used to combine the resulting terms and expose the reduction formula. The proof is completed in 3 steps: 1) apply integration by parts twice, 2) use trig identities to simplify one term, and 3) combine like terms to arrive at the final formula.

Uploaded by

sudipmaji441
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
38 views2 pages

Question 1. Prove The Reduction Formula: Example: Section 7.1: Integration by Parts

This document provides a proof of the reduction formula for integrating sin^n x using integration by parts. It begins by stating the formula to be proved and the strategy of using integration by parts. It then performs the integration by parts twice, first in a way that complicates the integrand, then in a way that isolates the trig functions. Some algebraic manipulations are used to combine the resulting terms and expose the reduction formula. The proof is completed in 3 steps: 1) apply integration by parts twice, 2) use trig identities to simplify one term, and 3) combine like terms to arrive at the final formula.

Uploaded by

sudipmaji441
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

EXAMPLE: SECTION 7.

1: INTEGRATION BY PARTS

110.109 CALCULUS II (PHYS SCI & ENG)


PROFESSOR RICHARD BROWN

∫ ∫
1 n−1
Question 1. Prove the reduction formula sin x dx = − sinn−1 x cos x +
n
sinn−2 x dx
n n
for n > 1.

Strategy: Here, we will use the Integration by Parts method (IbP) to rewrite the integrand as
a product of functions be stripping off one of the factors in the power. Then the right-hand-side
integral in the IbP will still only involve trig functions. We can see this due to the pattern in the
first function after the equal sign in the reduction formula above. (when trying to prove a formula,
looking for patterns and structure in the formula itself is not cheating. It is the proper exploration
of structure.) After utilizing the IbP method, we will use algebra to hopefully expose the formula.

Solution: First, notice that if we try the assignments u = sinn x and dv = 1dx, then du =
n sinn−1 x cos x and v = x. Then the IbP gives us the following:
∫ ∫
sin x dx = x sin x − nx sinn−1 x cos x dx.
n n

While this is certainly correct, the introduction of an x into the integrand on the right-hand side,
along with the now two trig functions has made the problem more complicated to solve. Instead
of continuing this path, let’s try a different approach.
Instead, since n > 1, strip off one of the factors and write the integrand as a product of two
trig functions, one to the power n − 1. Then at least after we apply the IbP, the right-hand-side
integral will have only trig functions in it. Hence we let u = sinn−1 x and dv = sin x dx, so that
du = (n − 1) sinn−2 x cos x dx, and v = − cos x. The IbP formula then becomes
∫ ∫ ∫
n
sin x dx = sin n−1
x sin x dx = − sin n−1
x cos x −
(− cos x)(n − 1) sinn−2 x cos x dx
∫
= − sinn−1
x cos x + (n − 1) sinn−2 x cos2 x dx.

Notice that in this last integral, there is no x as a polynomial present. In fact, using the identity
sin2 x + cos2 x = 1, or cos2 x = 1−]sin2 x, we get
∫ ∫
sin x dx = − sin
n n−1
x cos x + (n − 1) sinn−2 x cos2 x dx
∫
= − sin n−1
x cos x + (n − 1)
sinn−2 x(1 − sin2 x) dx
∫ ∫
= − sinn−1
x cos x + (n − 1) sin n−2
x dx − (n − 1) sinn x dx.
1
2 110.109 CALCULUS II (PHYS SCI & ENG) PROFESSOR RICHARD BROWN

We now have two terms that include the integral of sinn x, then thing we are hoping solve for.
Using just a bit of algebra, we can combine them:
∫ ∫ ∫
sin x dx + (n − 1) sin x dx = − sin
n n n−1
x cos x + (n − 1) sinn−2 x dx
∫ ∫
(1 + n − 1) sin x dx = − sin
n n−1
x cos x + (n − 1) sinn−2 x dx
∫ ∫
n sin x dx = − sin
n n−1
x cos x + (n − 1) sinn−2 x dx
∫ ∫
1 n−1
sin x dx = − sin
n n−1
x cos x + sinn−2 x dx.
n n

You might also like