Articulo Anestesiologia
Articulo Anestesiologia
Articulo Anestesiologia
CONCISE REVIEW
doi: 10.1111/idj.12615
Over the past century, there is perhaps no greater contribution to the practice of clinical dentistry than the development
and application of local anaesthesia. What were once considered painful procedures have now been made routine by the
deposition and action of local anaesthetics. This article will serve as a review of basic pharmacological principles of local
anaesthesia, subsequent sequelae that can arise from their use, considerations when using local anaesthetics, and recent
advances in the delivery of local anaesthetics.
Key words: Local anaesthetics, pharmacology, adverse reaction, drug interaction, mechanism of action
The best means of avoiding local anaesthetic sys- Table 2 Example calculation of amount of local
temic toxicity is awareness of the patient’s weight, the anaesthetic in a dental anaesthetic cartridge
maximum per kilogram (or absolute) dose of the local
Information Calculation and amount
anaesthetic being administered (see Table 1), and
careful calculation so as to avoid systemic concentra- A 2% solution has a 20 mg/mL 9 1.8 mL = 36 mg
concentration of 20 mg/mL
tions of the drug that could disrupt regular cell mem- The cartridge has 1.8 mL of
brane function. Included in the Table is a list of the solution
most commonly used local anaesthetics in dentistry as A 4% solution has a 40 mg/mL 9 1.8 mL = 72 mg
concentration of 20 mg/mL
well as their associated maximums that can be admin- The cartridge has 1.8 mL of
istered to patients on a per kilogram basis. In order to solution
determine the maximum dose for a patient, one must
simply multiply the patient’s weight by the per kilo-
gram maximum specific to the local anaesthetic being of local anaesthetic occurs, and the patient demon-
used by the dentist. strates an abnormal reaction of systemic toxicity
In order to determine how much local anaesthetic is despite no pre-existing medical condition14, or per-
in a cartridge (see the example in Table 2), the per- haps the patient had an unknown medical condition
cent solution of the local anaesthetic expressed in mg/ that predisposed them to local anaesthetic systemic
mL must be multiplied by the amount of solution in toxicity15. As such, astute clinicians should be ready
the cartridge. Of note, percentage of local anaesthetic to recognise and treat the symptoms of local anaesthe-
represents the number of grams per 100 mL, or mg sia systemic toxicity (tinnitus, metallic taste, circum-
per mL. For example, a 2% solution represents oral numbness, altered medical status, slurred speech,
20 mg/mL and a 4% solution represents 40 mg/mL. hypotension, bradycardia, seizures, ventricular
A typical dental local anaesthetic cartridge in North arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest). The management of
America contains approximately 1.8 mL, while many local anaesthetic systemic toxicity includes (but is not
countries use 2.2 mL cartridges. limited to):
Again, the amount of local anaesthetic being depos- • Activating emergency medical services when in an
ited should be less than the per kilogram maximum ambulatory location in order to be able to transport
specific to the local anaesthetic being used and less and monitor the patient in a tertiary care facility
than the absolute maximum associated with that local • Ensuring adequate oxygenation (may include
anaesthetic (Table 1). administering supplemental oxygen and/or manual
Despite the best efforts of clinicians, drug errors ventilation of the patient)
occur when the patient receives too large a dose of • Provided that intravenous access is established and
local anaesthetic, or an intravascular administration the provider has been trained to administer intra-
venous rescue medications:
a Administering of intravenous Intralipid 20%
Table 1 Recommended Canadian maximum doses of (1.5 mL/kg for a child or 100 mL bolus for an
local anaesthetics1,13 adult over 65 kg and a subsequent infusion of
0.25 mL/mh/min or more if hypotension persists)
Drug Maximum to treat the cardiac aspects of local anaesthetic
Articaine WITH vasoconstrictor 7 mg/kg (up to 500 mg) systemic toxicity
5 mg/kg in children b Treating seizures, if present (titration of intra-
Bupivacaine WITH vasoconstrictor 2 mg/kg (up to 200 mg) venous midazolam beginning with 100 mcg/kg
Lidocaine WITH vasoconstrictor 7 mg/kg (up to 500 mg)
Mepivacaine WITH vasoconstrictor 6.6 mg/kg (up to 400 mg) for a child or 5 mg for an adult)
Prilocaine WITH vasoconstrictor 8 mg/kg (up to 500 mg) c Treating bradycardia and/or hypotension with an
Mepivacaine WITHOUT 6.6 mg/kg (up to 400 mg) intravenous vasopressor
vasoconstrictor
Prilocaine WITHOUT vasoconstrictor 8 mg/kg (up to 500 mg) d Monitoring for ventricular fibrillation or ventric-
ular tachycardias and treating as appropriate
The maximum recommended dose may vary from country to coun-
try. The maximum dosage means ‘a single volume administered’; if
e Anticipating acidosis, hypercarbia, hyperkalemia,
additional cartridges are administered at a later time in the proce- and treating as necessary.
dure then the calculation is no longer valid as one must incorporate
redistribution and drug half-lives into current systemic dose. Many
schools and organisations teach the maximum dose of lidocaine 2% Allergy
with 1:100,000 epinephrine as 4.4 mg/kg but there is no consensus
on the issue61,62. There have been some investigators who advocate True documented allergy to amide-type local anaes-
for abandoning the idea of maximum recommended doses63 and thetics is exceedingly rare16. While some literature
instead taking patient and clinician factors into consideration such
as the patient’s age, the site of injection, the speed of injection, and reports an incidence of allergy from 0.1% to 1%17,
the existence of other comorbidities64. recent data suggest a possible increase in the incidence
© 2020 FDI World Dental Federation 3
Decloux and Ouanounou
chewing on these structures. If possible, the use of a because the gauge of needle was too small. In either
local anaesthetic without epinephrine will reduce the case, if the contents of the cartridge are deposited
amount of time that this soft tissue anaesthesia per- directly into the bloodstream, patients can experience
sists. Additionally, a practitioner may decide that the immediate symptoms from both the local anaesthetic
use of phentolamine mesylate would be appropriate, and vasoconstrictor24. While these symptoms are
to be administered in order to cause local vasodilation often related to the blood flow from vessels adjacent
in the area where a vasoconstrictor was previous to the block being performed, they may present as
administered, thus accelerating the rate of redistribu- palpitations, headaches, visual disturbances, and ver-
tion of the local anaesthetic, accelerating the offset of tigo. While patient reassurance that these symptoms
the drug, and subsequently accelerating the reversal of will resolve is first-line management of an intravascu-
collateral soft tissue numbness. This medication is fur- lar injection, the dental practitioner would be prudent
ther discussed later in the paper. to continue to monitor level of consciousness and vital
signs until the local anaesthetic has redistributed away
from the site of injection and the patient has returned
Trismus
to their baseline state. Anecdotally, just one cartridge
Trismus, a reduction in the range of mandibular of lidocaine can and in cases has produced seizures,
motion, can occur after a dental injection. It is often illustrating how the speed attending intravascular
caused by the needle passing through a muscle of injection may be the decisive factor in the severity of
mastication which in turn causes spasticity to the local anaesthetic systemic toxicity.
muscle23. It can also be caused by the accumulation
of a haematoma (see below) impeding excursive
Haematoma
movements that permit full opening. Analgesics and a
soft diet are mainstay therapies in the acute phase of As the needle is passing through connective tissue, it
trismus following a dental injection, with a gradual is not uncommon for the tip to puncture a vascular
return to function and physiotherapy if necessary. structure. Occasionally, blood will extravasate from
this broach of endothelium into the surrounding
extravascular area and accumulate locally. This can
Intravascular injections
be associated with facial swelling, soreness, and tris-
In order to administer local anaesthesia, a loaded syr- mus from the expansion of the potential space where
inge with an attached needle is inserted into the desired the bleeding from the insult occurred25. If a haema-
location of deposition. New needles have an associated toma is suspected, a dentist should immediately apply
bevel that are sharp in order to comfortably puncture pressure to the area in order to aid in haemostasis of
oral mucosa, but that same quality reducing initial dis- the punctured vessel and to attempt to reduce the
comfort of mucosal puncture and travel through con- amount of extravasation in the area. The patient
nective tissue can lead to puncture of surrounding should only be dismissed once the dentist is confident
vascular structures. When a dentist has reached their that the bleeding has ceased.
intended endpoint where local anaesthesia is to be
deposited, it is recommended that, at minimum, one
Ocular complications
aspiration manoeuvre is performed. This act (via either
pressing an aspiration ring or withdrawing from a car- There have been case reports published for over
tridge that has a harpoon inserted into the cartridge’s 50 years about various ocular complications arising
rubber stopper) introduces negative pressure into the from the administration of inferior alveolar blocks.
local anaesthetic cartridge and serves the purpose of There may be one or more symptoms including, but
aspirating whatever matter is at the tip of the needle. If not limited to, amaurosis, diplopia, total ophthalmo-
a needle tip is located inside a vascular structure, the plegia, mydriasis, ptosis, and blanching of the perior-
negative pressure into the cartridge should in theory bital skin26. The common belief of the cause of this
draw visible blood into the cartridge and alert the den- phenomenon is the variable anatomy of the maxillary
tist of the needle’s tip inside a blood vessel. artery in which there is a subsequent intravascular
Unfortunately, there are times when an aspiration injection which could carry the local anaesthetic in a
manoeuvre is carried out while the needle tip is indeed retrograde manner from the middle meningeal artery
in a blood vessel but there is a false negative aspira- through the foramen spinosum and back to the lacrimal
tion (that is, no blood is visualised in the cartridge). and optic arteries resulting in anaesthetisation of cra-
This false negative event could be due to either the nial nerves 3, 4 and 6. Generally supportive measures
bevel of the needle being positioned in such a way and tincture of time suffice to resolve this complication,
that the action of aspiration draws the wall of the but a differential diagnosis should be formed and refer-
vascular structure to the bevel instead of blood, or ral to the appropriate sub-specialist if necessary.
© 2020 FDI World Dental Federation 5
Decloux and Ouanounou
Table 3 Example calculations of maximum dose for local anaesthetic for various patients
Information Calculation and Maximum
Table 4 Drugs known to cause interactions with vasoconstrictors and potential associated effects
Drug Effect
Beta blockers (drugs that end in -olol) Beta-blockers block beta-adrenergic receptors and can produce
Ex. metoprolol, propranolol, labetalol, bisoprolol, atenolol unrecognised and unopposed alpha-adrenergic receptor agonism
with corresponding hypertension when epinephrine is present.
Volatile anaesthetics (drugs that end in -ane) Volatile anaesthetics sensitise the myocardium to catecholamines
Ex. halothane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, desflurane – cardiac arrhythmias can be induced with the injection of
exogenous epinephrine.
Amphetamines (names vary) Amphetamines increase blood pressure and can cause cardiac
Ex. cocaine, methamphetamine arrhythmias by themselves with the potential for adverse event
synergism from epinephrine.
Tricyclic antidepressants (names vary) Tricyclic antidepressants increase the systemic circulation of
Ex. amitriptyline, imipramine, trimipramine, nortriptyline, catecholamines and can lead to systemic hypertension when
protriptyline, desipramine supplementary epinephrine is present.
local anaesthetic solution, and the sphenomandibular animal studies42. The first trimester of pregnancy
ligament possibly impeding diffusion of local anaes- poses the highest threat for teratogenicity and so only
thetic to the IAN (likely because the needle tip was too emergent dental work should be completed during this
medial to the mandibular foramen)36. Accessory inner- trimester. It is currently believed that the second tri-
vation from the mylohyoid nerve, the long buccal mester poses the lowest risk of foetal harm and local
nerve, the greater auricular nerve, and even a bifid anaesthesia use should in theory be safe43. While it is
IAN can also carry additional sensory fibres to possible to complete elective dental treatment during
mandibular dentition31. Given the above information, the third trimester of pregnancy, there is a higher risk
all injections should be performed with prior examina- of aortocaval compression and increased conduction
tion of the patients’ anatomical features to permit blockade. If local anaesthesia is to be administered in
minor alterations to technique as necessary in order to the third trimester, lower doses should be used.
maximise chances of success of a nerve blockade.
Elderly
Inflamed dental pulps
Current demographic data show that the North Amer-
As carious lesions increase in size and proximity to ican population is aging, and projections suggest that
pulpal tissue, various biologic markers are produced the percentage of older people will continue to
and subsequent inflammatory mediators are recruited increase44. In those of advanced age, the pharmacoki-
to the site37. This inflammation creates a localised netics and pharmacodynamics of many drugs are
area of inflammatory acidosis where the lowered pH altered44. No significant differences in the response of
value inhibits the action of local anaesthetics due to the elderly to local anaesthetics are expected. How-
the altered interaction with components of the lipo- ever, as aging is accompanied by decreased liver and
somes38. Additionally, various isoforms of tetrodo- kidney function, doses below the maximum are rec-
toxin-resistant sodium channels (i.e. sodium channels ommended44.
on which lidocaine has a reduced antinociceptive Also, geriatric patients commonly have cardiovascu-
effect)39 are recruited in the inflammatory state40. lar disease and, thus, the dose of epinephrine con-
This combination of factors can make reliable and tained in anaesthetics should be limited to a
profound anaesthesia very difficult to achieve, and maximum of 0.04 mg44. Even without a history of
practitioners should be prepared to administer adjunc- overt cardiovascular disease, it is prudent to minimise
tive techniques such as intra-osseous or periodontal the use of epinephrine in elderly patients simply
ligament injections in order to provide a comfortable because of the expected effect of aging on the heart.
experience for their patients41. Monitoring blood pressure and heart rate is advised
when considering multiple administrations of epi-
nephrine-containing local anaesthetic.
Pregnancy
At this time, only lidocaine and prilocaine have an
Children
FDA foetal risk classification indicating no risk of ter-
atogenic effects based on the results of human and Children are at higher risk for soft tissue injury due to
animal studies. Other commonly used local anaesthet- a relative lack of awareness after local anaesthetic
ics (bupivacaine, articaine, mepivacaine) have an FDA administration. Children are at a higher risk for local
foetal risk classification indicating that teratogenic anaesthetic systemic toxicity because they weigh sig-
risk cannot be eliminated on the basis of human and nificantly less than an adult patient so their absolute
© 2020 FDI World Dental Federation 7
Decloux and Ouanounou
threshold for local anaesthesia deposition is much associated with injections and increase the speed of
lower than that of adults45. Practitioners should also onset of nerve blockade. Current studies show that
be wary of patient and personal safety when deliver- the above claims above are increasingly likely to be
ing local anaesthetic to a pre-cooperative or anxious true and dental manufacturing companies are creating
child as needle-stick injury may be more likely given a devices that alkanise, that is increase the pH of, local
mobile target for local anaesthesia deposition. anaesthetic solutions prior to dental injection50. It
should be noted that a recent meta-analysis shows
that buffered local anaesthetics have 2.23 times
Patients on anticoagulants
greater likelihood of achieving profound anaesthesia
It is currently understood that patients within thera- in pulpally involved teeth51.
peutic international normalised ratio (INR) ranges can
receive local anaesthetic nerve blocks without cessa-
Inhaled local anaesthetics
tion of the anticoagulant beforehand. Even if a hae-
matoma does occur, local haemostatic measures are A combination of local anaesthetics (tetracaine) and
generally sufficient to produce haemostasis. nasal decongestants (oxymetazoline) is being used to
anaesthetise maxillary anterior teeth. This combina-
tion of drugs may demonstrate less successful pulpal
ADVANCES
anaesthesia and more adverse events compared to tra-
ditionally deposited local anaesthetics52.
Computer-controlled local anaesthetic delivery
There are now several electronic devices on the mar-
Liposomal bupivacaine
ket that aid in the delivery of local anaesthesia, specif-
ically with digital controls that can be manipulated to In an attempt to increase the duration of local anaes-
aid in aspiration and continuous delivery of local thetics, a formulation of bupivacaine has been pro-
anaesthetic solution46. Many microprocessor-aided duced where the local anaesthetic molecule is loaded
local anaesthesia devices will monitor the counterpres- in multivesicular liposomes. This slow-release formu-
sure exerted by the tissues into which the local anaes- lation of drug is able to delay the release of local
thetic is being injected and vary the rate of deposition anaesthetic and therefore extend the duration of pain
of injectate accordingly47. In addition to assuming a relief for the patient for up to 72 hours, compared to
less threatening appearance than a traditional syringe unaltered bupivacaine traditionally providing up to
and needle armamentarium, these computer-controlled 8 hours of analgesia. It has been demonstrated to be
devices will ensure both appropriate aspiration and suitable for local infiltration leading to increased dura-
duration of delivery of the local anaesthesia which tion of action and subsequent sparing of other anal-
may reduce injection pain. gesic medications (such as opioids)53. The safety
profile is currently being established and appears not
to differ from that of bupivacaine with no additional
Phentolamine mesylate
incidence of adverse events being noted. Some trials
Most local anaesthetic cartridges deposited worldwide have noted no difference in reducing the duration of
contain epinephrine, so for patients at higher risk of analgesia of necrotic teeth from that of traditional
traumatic injury to soft tissues or simply patients who bupivacaine54. That being said, additional trials with
wish to have their blockade reversed more quickly, significant power are needed before its use can be rec-
phentolamine mesylate is a vasodilator that when ommended.
deposited in a similar location to the original epi-
nephrine-containing local anaesthetic solution can
Local anaesthetic infusion pumps for localised
overwhelm the previous vasoconstriction and aid in
deposition at the surgical site
the redistribution (and the clinical offset) of the local
anaesthetic48. Recent studies suggest that it may have Following surgical procedures, clinicians must deter-
particular use in children in providing a more rapid mine the most appropriate means of controlling any
recovery of lip sensation which may decrease the inci- post-operative pain associated with the procedure.
dence of soft tissue trauma associated with local This can be accomplished by a variety of localised or
anaesthetic delivery in this age group49. systemic means (some of which have been noted pre-
viously), one of which is an emerging method of
patient-controlled localised deposition of local anaes-
Buffered local anaesthetics
thetic at the site of injury or surgery. There are many
It is believed that an increased pH of a solution being examples of a patient-controlled local anaesthetic
deposited could decrease the amount of discomfort infusion pump such as the ON-Q pain pump being
8 © 2020 FDI World Dental Federation
Local anaesthesia in dentistry
used for general medical surgery55–57, but there is still 7. Cazaubon Y, Mauprivez C, Feliu C et al. Population pharma-
cokinetics of articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine during third
much research to be carried out about these infiltrat- molar surgery and simulation of high-dose regimens. Eur J
ing catheters and their potential benefit in treating the Pharm Sci 2018 114: 38–45.
head and neck region58, and possible intraoral appli- 8. Wahl MJ, Brown RS. Dentistry’s wonder drugs: local anesthetics
cations. and vasoconstrictors. Gen Dent 2010 58: 114–123: quiz 124-5.
9. Hondrum SO, Ezell JH. The relationship between pH and con-
centrations of antioxidants and vasoconstrictors in local anes-
Ultrasound-guided IAN blocks thetic solutions. Anesth Prog 1996 43: 85–91.
10. Malamed SF. Allergy and toxic reactions to local anesthetics.
In order to negate mandibular anatomical differences Dent Today 2003 22: 114–116, 118-21.
in varied patient populations, the use of ultrasonogra- 11. Silva GH, Bottoli CB, Groppo FC et al. Methylparaben concen-
phy to visualise and direct the blockage of the IAN tration in commercial Brazilian local anesthetics solutions. J
may prove worthwhile. Previous studies have either Appl Oral Sci 2012 20: 448.
used Doppler ultrasound (i.e. indirect assessment) of 12. El-Boghdadly K, Pawa A, Chin KJ. Local anesthetic systemic
toxicity: current perspectives. Local Reg Anesth 2018 11:
the IAN position for local anaesthetic deposition59 or 35–44.
injected coloured dye on cadavers to assess proximity 13. Sekimoto K, Tobe M, Saito S. Local anesthetic toxicity: acute
of injectate deposition to the IAN60. There are cur- and chronic management. Acute Med Surg 2017 4: 152–160.
rently ongoing studies using B-mode ultrasound (i.e. 14. Alsukhni RA, Ghoubari MS, Farfouti MT et al. Status epilepti-
direct assessment) to directly visualise the IAN while cus following local anesthesia in a previously healthy adult.
using intraoral ultrasound to guide intraoral inferior BMC Res Notes 2016 9: 300.
alveolar blocks on patients with subsequent objective 15. Kauferstein S, Kiehne N, Peigneur S et al. Cardiac channelopa-
thy causing sudden death as revealed by molecular autopsy. Int
pulpal anaesthesia testing. J Legal Med 2013 127: 145–151.
16. Bina B, Hersh EV, Hilario M et al. True allergy to amide local
anesthetics: a review and case presentation. Anesth Prog 2018
CONCLUSION 65: 119–123.
This paper provides a review of the pharmacology, 17. Fisher MM, Bowey CJ. Alleged allergy to local anaesthetics.
Anaesth Intensive Care 1997 25: 611–614.
techniques, and advances of local anaesthesia use in
18. To D, Kossintseva I, de Gannes G. Lidocaine contact allergy is
dentistry and should serve as a baseline for under- becoming more prevalent. Dermatol Surg 2014 40: 1367–1372.
standing that general dental practitioners possess for 19. Jenerowicz D, Pola nska A, Gli
nska O et al. Allergy to lidocaine
safe treatment of patients. Clinicians are encouraged injections: comparison of patient history with skin testing in
to continue to expand both their didactic knowledge five patients. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2014 31: 134–138.
and practical clinical skills through advanced reading, 20. Mali S. Anaphylaxis during the perioperative period. Anesth
discussion with colleagues, continuing education Essays Res 2012 6: 124–133.
courses and treatment of patients. 21. Baluga JC. Allergy to local anesthetics in dentistry. Myth or
reality? Rev Alerg Mex 2003 50: 176–181.
22. Chi D, Kanellis M, Himadi E et al. Lip biting in a pediatric
Acknowledgement dental patient after dental local anesthesia: a case report. J
Pediatr Nurs 2008 23: 490–493.
None. 23. Stone J, Kaban LB. Trismus after injection of local anesthetic.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1979 48: 29–32.
24. Taghavi Zenouz A, Ebrahimi H, Mahdipour M et al. The inci-
Conflict of interest dence of intravascular needle entrance during inferior alveolar
nerve block injection. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects
None. 2008 2: 38–41.
25. Gupta N, Singh K, Sharma S. Hematoma – a complication of
REFERENCES posterior superior alveolar nerve block. J Dent Probl Solut
2015 2: 015–016.
1. Gaffen AS, Haas DA. Survey of local anesthetic use by Ontario
dentists. J Can Dent Assoc 2009 75: 649. 26. Williams JV, Williams LR, Colbert SD et al. Amaurosis, oph-
thalmoplegia, ptosis, mydriasis and periorbital blanching fol-
2. Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacolog- lowing inferior alveolar nerve anaesthesia. Oral Maxillofac
ical considerations. Anesth Prog 2012 59: 90–103. Surg 2011 15: 67–70.
3. Becker DE, Reed KL. Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacol- 27. Garisto GA, Gaffen AS, Lawrence HP et al. Occurrence of
ogy. Anesth Prog 2006 53: 98–110. paresthesia after dental local anesthetic administration in the
4. French J, Sharp LM. Local anaesthetics. Ann R Coll Surg Engl United States. J Am Dent Assoc 2010 141: 836–844.
2012 94: 76–80. 28. Haas DA, Lennon D. A 21 year retrospective study of reports
5. Weinberg L, Peake B, Tan C et al. Pharmacokinetics and phar- of paresthesia following local anesthetic administration. J Can
macodynamics of lignocaine: a review. World J Anesthesiol Dent Assoc 1995 61: 319–320, 323-6, 329-30.
2015 4: 17–29. 29. Pogrel MA, Schmidt BL, Sambajon V et al. Lingual nerve dam-
6. Snoeck M. Articaine: a review of its use for local and regional age due to inferior alveolar nerve blocks: a possible explana-
anesthesia. Local Reg Anesth 2012 5: 23–33. tion. J Am Dent Assoc 2003 134: 195–199.
30. Albalawi F, Lim JC, DiRenzo KV et al. Effects of lidocaine and 50. Guo J, Yin K, Roges R et al. Efficacy of sodium bicarbonate
articaine on neuronal survival and recovery. Anesth Prog 2018 buffered versus non-buffered lidocaine with epinephrine in infe-
65: 82–88. rior alveolar nerve block: a meta-analysis. J Dent Anesth Pain
31. Malet A, Faure MO, Deletage N et al. The comparative cyto- Med 2018 18: 129–142.
toxic effects of different local anesthetics on a human neurob- 51. Kattan S, Lee SM, Hersh EV et al. Do buffered local anesthet-
lastoma cell line. Anesth Analg 2015 120: 589–596. ics provide more successful anesthesia than nonbuffered solu-
32. DiRenzo KV, Lim JL, Albalawi F et al. Differential effects of tions in patients with pulpally involved teeth requiring dental
sodium channel blockers on neural survival and responsiveness; therapy?: A systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2019 150:
2% lidocaine kills more SHSY-5Y cells and reduces cellular 165–177.
activity as compared to 4% articaine. J Dent Res 2016 95: 52. Capetillo J, Drum M, Reader A et al. Anesthetic efficacy of
0790. intranasal 3% tetracaine plus 0.05% oxymetazoline (Kovanaze)
33. Blanton PL, Jeske AH. Misconceptions involving dental local in maxillary teeth. J Endod 2019 45: 257–262.
anesthesia. Part 1: anatomy. Texas Dent J 2002 119: 296–300, 53. Chahar P, Cummings KC 3rd. Liposomal bupivacaine: a review
302-4, 306-7. of a new bupivacaine formulation. J Pain Res 2012 5: 257–264.
34. Todorovic L, Stajcic Z, Petrovic V. Mandibular versus inferior 54. Glenn B, Drum M, Reader A et al. Does liposomal bupivacaine
dental anaesthesia: clinical assessment of 3 different techniques. (Exparel) significantly reduce postoperative pain/numbness in
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986 15: 733–738. symptomatic teeth with a diagnosis of necrosis? a prospective,
35. Montagnese TA, Reader A, Melfi R. A comparative study of randomized, double-blind trial. J Endod 2016 42: 1301–1306.
the Gow-Gates technique and a standard technique for 55. Baig MK, Zmora O, Derdemezi J et al. Use of the ON-Q pain
mandibular anaesthesia. J Endod 1984 10: 158–163. management system is associated with decreased postoperative
36. Khoury JN, Mihailidis S, Ghabriel M et al. Applied anatomy of analgesic requirement: double blind randomized placebo pilot
the pterygomandibular space: improving the success of inferior study. J Am Coll Surg 2006 202: 297–305.
alveolar nerve blocks. Aust Dent J 2011 56: 112–121. 56. Chung D, Lee YJ, Jo MH et al. The ON-Q pain management sys-
37. Byers MR, Narhi M. Dental injury models: experimental tools tem in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: management of
for understanding neuroinflammatory interactions and poly- postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-
modal nociceptor functions. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1999 10: controlled analgesia. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2013 56: 93–101.
4–39. 57. Soliz JM, Gebhardt R, Feng L et al. Comparing epidural anal-
38. Ueno T, Tsuchiya H, Mizogami M et al. Local anesthetic fail- gesia and ON-Q infiltrating catheters for pain management
ure associated with inflammation: verification of the acidosis after hepatic resection. Open J Anesthesiol 2013 3: 3–7.
mechanism and the hypothetic participation of inflammatory 58. Charous S. Use of the ON-Q pain pump management system in
peroxynitrite. J Inflamm Res 2008 1: 41–48. the head and neck: preliminary report. Otolaryngol Head Neck
39. Kistner K, Zimmermann K, Ehnert C et al. The tetrodotoxin- Surg 2008 138: 110–112.
resistant Na+ channel Na (v)1.8 reduces the potency of local 59. Hannan L, Reader A, Nist R et al. The use of ultrasound for
anesthetics in blocking C-fiber nociceptors. Pflugers Arch 2010 guiding needle placement for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Oral
459: 751–763. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 1999 87: 658–665.
40. Renton T, Yiangou Y, Plumpton C et al. Sodium channel 60. Chanpong B, Tang R, Sawka A et al. Real-time ultrasono-
Nav1.8 immunoreactivity in painful human dental pulp. BMC graphic visualization for guided inferior alveolar nerve injec-
Oral Health 2005 5: 5. tion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013 115:
41. Nusstein JM, Reader A, Drum M. Local anesthesia strategies 272–276.
for the patient with a “hot” tooth. Dent Clin North Am 2010 61. Reynolds F. Maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics:
54: 237–247. a constant cause of confusion. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2005 30:
42. Lee JM, Shin TJ. Use of local anesthetics for dental treatment 314–316.
during pregnancy; safety for parturient. J Dent Anesth Pain 62. DeLuke DM, Cannon D, Carrico C et al. Is maximal dosage
Med 2017 17: 81–90. for local anesthetics taught consistently across U.S. dental
43. Ouanounou A, Haas DA. Drug therapy during pregnancy: schools? A national survey. J Dent Educ 2018 82: 621–624.
implications for dental practice. Br Dent J 2016 220: 413–417. 63. Heavner JE. Let’s abandon blanket maximum recommended
44. Ouanounou A, Haas DA. Pharmacotherapy for the elderly den- doses of local anesthetics (letter). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004
tal patient. J Can Dent Assoc 2015 80: f18. 29: 524.
45. Nicola W, Ouanounou A. Pharmacotherapy for the pediatric 64. Rosenberg PH, Veering B, Urmey WF. Maximum recom-
dental patient. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2019 40: 349–353; mended doses of local anesthetics: a multifactorial concept. Reg
quiz 354. Anesth Pain Med 2004 29: 564–575.