Eviction Watch
Eviction Watch
Eviction Watch
editors
sushil george I suresh nautiyal
ISBN 81-89479-16-4
Compiled by
Sushil George
Edited by
Sushil George | Suresh Nautiyal
Cover Design
Pavitra Tuladhar
Layout
Hardeo Sharma
Cover photo: Section of the collage depicts a child dehoused. The municipal corporation of Delhi demolished
more than 284 houses in Bhatti Mines' Indira Colony slum followed by the Supreme Court orders. (Courtesy-
The Indian Express photo by Vikram Sharma April 21, 2006).
Suggested contribution: INR 350, USD 35
Printed by HRLN at ................. publications.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this publication are not necessarily the views of the HRLN. Although every
effort has been made to avoid errors, omissions, and inaccuracies, the HRLN takes responsibility for inadvertent
errors or discrepancies that may remain nonetheless.
*Any section of this volume may be reproduced without prior permission of the Human Rights Law
Network for public interest purposes with appropriate acknowledgement.
This volume is dedicated to the memory of our colleague, comrade and
friend Rajeev John George, who inspired several people enaged in the
movement for housing rights. Rajeev had played a critical role in the national
campaign against forced evictions. His vision was that all urban inhabitants
should have their share of space, sky and basic civic amenities.
Acknowledgments
This book is an outcome of the collective work of the various organisations and individuals working towards
right to housing and campaign against forced evictions in major Indian cities.
We would, foremost, like to acknowledge Mr Colin Gonsalves for his intellectual support and encouragement
for bringing out this publication. We would like to especially thank Mr PK Das, Ms Deepika D’souza, Dr Harsh
Dobhal, Prof K Shanmugavelayutham, Mr Indu Prakash Singh, Mr Lalit Batra and advocate SH Iyer for
providing constructive solutions, strategies and critical review of the present housing policies.
We sincerely thank Ms Binda Sinha for collecting all international case laws on the right to housing and Ms
Bedoshruti Sadhukhan for her vital inputs in bringing out the volume. We would also like to thank Mr Shantanu
Duttagupta for his ideation with regard to visual inputs.
Our many thanks to all housing rights activists and organisations who have helped us in the compilation of this
volume, especially to: Mr Aswaq Mohammed and Mr Jeevan Kumar from CHATRI, Hyderabad; Kirity Roy
from MASUM; Jan Sanhati Kendra and Ucchhed Birodhi Jukta Moncha, Kolkata; Ms D Leena from the
Hazard Centre, New Delhi; Mr Sanjay Sangvai from the National Alliance of Peoples Movements; Mohd
Pathan of the Sabarmati Nagrik Suraksha Samiti; Ms Beena Jadhav, ActionAid, Ahmedabad; and Mr M
Venkateswarulu and Laxmi from Slum Dwellers Welfare Union, Visakhapatnam.
here has been an increasing consciousness among the global civil society groups on the seriousness of
T housing and displacement crisis, deepening especially in Asia, Latin America and Africa. It is, however,
difficult to measure the seriousness of the problem if one does not look for an efficient means of
solving it. At the start of the new millennium, India witnessed one of the largest urban displacements. In
Mumbai 300,000 and in Delhi 150,000 persons have been brutally displaced. Similarly, in other cities and towns,
forced evictions are driving millions of urban poor into homelessness, destitution and vulnerability.
The demolition squades raze structures often without notices; arrive at the residential sites during night or early
in the morning, even when menfolks are away for their daily works and only children are at homes. In New
Delhi and other major cities, such people are denied tenurial rights and are either forced to become homeless or
are dumped 40-50 kilometres away at remote places.
Globally, about one billion people are living in slums and informal settlements. Slum dwellers make up over 40
percent of the total population in the cities of Asia, Africa and Latin America. According to the Census 2001,
India’s total urban population is 285.35 million, with approximately one-third characterised as the poorest and
most vulnerable in terms of housing and basic amenities.
The Human Rights Law Networks (HRLN), in collaboration with different organisations, has been advocating
and campaigning for the right to housing through workshops, campaigns and legal interventions. The first
report of Eviction Watch India (EWI) was released in January 2003 at the Asian Social Forum in Hyderabad.
This volume provides trends of forced evictions taking place in major cities like Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai,
Kolkata, Hyderabad, Ahmedabad and Visakhapatnam. The second edition of the EWI also hopes to facilitate
the establishment of a network and linkage with organisations of other cities by providing basic information
for advocacy and campaigns to consolidate solidarity with urban struggle groups across India.
This volume presents to the global civil society the magnitude of the problem of forced evictions and associated
economic and human costs rendered by such inhuman actions. The articles included in the volume are contributions
of professors, lawyers, professionals, journalists, planners, architects and activists, who have recommended a
comprehensive strategy to protect housing rights in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of India
and the various United Nations Resolutions for adequate housing to all sections of society, as this can bridge the
gaps in policies and practices related to housing.
We express our sincere gratitude and acknowledgment to Late Rajeev John George who had played a significant
role in releasing the first report of the Eviction Watch India. His memory, solidarity and valuable contribution to
the housing rights struggle will always be imprinted in our minds and hearts.
Sushil George
Housing Rights Initiative
Human Rights Law Network, India
(v)
Eviction Watch India - II
Contents
Acknowledgments.......................................................................................... (iv)
Preface............................................................................................................... (v)
List of acronyms and special terms.......................................................... (viii)
List of tables.................................................................................................... (ix)
List of annexures............................................................................................ (x)
Introduction..................................................................................................... (xi)
Executive summary........................................................................................ (xiii)
(vii)
List of acronyms and special terms
List of Tables
S No Title Page No
1) Conversion Table ix
2) Illegal structures identified 22
3) Forced evictions in Delhi 23
4) List of forced evictions in Mumbai 40
5) Number of people displaced by the MUTP 43
6) Growth of informal settlements in Chennai (1932–1981) 48
7) Displacements in the first phase of the MRTS project 49
8) Second phase of the MRTS project 49
9) Forced evictions in Ahmedabad 64
10) Slums threatened with evictions due to the TP schemes 66
11) Average annual supply of housing in Greater Mumbai 70
12) Population of cities 1991-2001 79
13) Night shelter schemes 82
14) Urban Reforms Incentive Fund 84
15) Average annual rate of change of urban/rural population. 293
16) Share of urban population in 2001. 294
17) Population projection for 2001-2025. 295
18) Sectoral employment growth projection. 296
Conversion Table
1 Lakh - 100,000
10 Lakh - One million
100 Lakh or 1 Crore - 10 million
Table – 1
(ix)
List of annexures
Page No
I. Major events
II. Definitions
III. People’s Charter on Housing Rights
IV. Memorandum to the chief minister, Tamil Nadu
V. Public Hearing held on May 21, 2003 at Chennai,
organised by the National Commission for Women
VI. Fact finding team – report I
VII. Fact finding team – report II
VIII. Campaign for Housing and Tenurial Rights, Hyderabad
IX. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (LAA 1894)
X. Slum Areas (Clearance and Improvement) Act, 1956
XI. Draft Slum Policy, 2001
XII. Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976
XIII. Repeal of the Urban Ceiling Act, 1999
XIV. Madhya Pradesh Patta Act, 1984
XV. BSUP
XVI. IHSDP
XVII. VAMBAY scheme
XVIII. Draft National Urban Housing and Habitat Policy, 2005
XIX. New Delhi (Special Provisions) Bill
XX. Draft Housing Bill of the Sajha Manch
XXI. Draft Housing Bill of the HRLN
ne of the pioneering housing rights displaced nearly 300,000 persons, creating a record
(xi)
society organisations seriously felt that the trend of cities. It consists of descriptions of major evictions
evictions against the urban poor was rapidly increasing. and a list of localities where evictions have been most
virulent. Information has also been collated from
Though there are groups working on the housing issues available documents including newspaper clippings and
nevertheless, they are hampered by hindrances in the other sources. It also includes landmark judgments in
flow of information. The volume updates necessary favour of or against the forced evictions. The draft of
information to facilitate pro-poor planning process to this volume was circulated to the concerned people
incorporate all the inhabitants within the legal and several organisations and the key information gaps,
framework, with the hope to facilitate a larger network pointed out by them, have been filled and their
and make linkages with housing rights organisations to comments incorporated.
strengthen and consolidate solidarity with the urban Summary analysis
poor struggle groups across the country. In India, housing for the poor is perhaps the most
neglected human development area. Housing shortage
Coverage in 1997 was estimated to be 13.66 million units. This
The volume covers evidence of forced evictions from shortage was 40.8 million units in 2000. Around 90
seven cities in India – Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai, Kolkata, percent of this shortage is for the lower income groups.
Hyderabad, Ahemdabad and Visakhapatnam and These estimates are expected to sharply increase in the
critical appraisal of housing policies. The national and near future. Thus, these trends clearly indicate the
international housing law also find due place in the magnitude of the housing problem in the country.
volume. Foreseeing the acute socio-economic imbalance in urban
centres of India, the provision of equitable access to
Process residential land, tenurial rights and basic civic amenities
The volume has been prepared in close collaboration have become the most challenging tasks with which to
with the struggle organisations of the above-mentioned cope in a country of more than a billion people.
Slum Population
Slum areas constituted
(i) All specified areas in a town or city notified as ‘slum’ by state/local government and UT administration under any
Act including a ‘Slum Act’.
(ii) All areas recognised as ‘slum’ by state/local government and UT administration, housing and slum boards,
which may have not been formally notified as slum under any Act.
Highlights
Twenty six states/union territories of India reported slum population in 640 cities/towns in 2001
Andhra Pradesh has the largest number of towns (77) reporting slums followed by Uttar Pradesh (69), Tamil
Nadu (63) and Maharashtra (61)
42.6 million population in slums, constituting 15 percent of the total urban population reported in 2001
11.2 million of the total slum population of the country in Maharashtra followed by Andhra Pradesh (5.2 million),
Uttar Pradesh (4.4 million) and West Bengal (4.1 million)
17.7 million slum population reported in the 27 cities with million plus population in 2001. Greater Mumbai
Municipal Corporation with 6.5 million slum dwellers has the highest slum population among all the cities
followed by Delhi Municipal Corporation (1.9 million), Kolkata (1.5 million) and Chennai (0.8 million)
6 million children in the age group 0-6 enumerated in slums. Maharashtra alone accounts for 1.6 million
children in slums
7.4 million (17.4 percent) of the total slum population belong to the SCs and one million (2.4 percent) to the STs
Sex ratio (females per thousand males) of the total slum population is 876, which is lower than 905 for the
corresponding non-slum urban population
Child Sex Ratio in the age group 0-6 is 919 in the slum population which is higher than 904 for non-slum urban
population
Literacy rate in the slum areas stands at 73.1 with 80.7 percent male and 64.4 percent female literacy against overall
non-slum urban literacy rates of 81.0 for total, 87.2 for males and 74.2 for females in the states reporting slums
32.9 percent slum population reported as workers. Male work participation rate is 51.3 and female work participation
rate is 11.9 percent in 2001
91.1 percent workers in the slum population are ‘other workers’ and 5 percent as ‘household Industry workers’
(xii)
Eviction Watch India - II
Executive summary
The EWI - II volume extensively describes and analyses and Pondicherry bore unprecedented damage and
the pattern of forced evictions against the local city destruction. The trends visible in the post-tsunami
inhabitants and undertakes a critical appraisal of scenario are of serious concern, especially for the coastal
changing trends in laws and policies on urban land. communities. There were gross irregularities during the
The first chapter provides an overview picture of the rehabilitation process and the reconstruction was
displacement trends and the court judgements. A brief delayed with the intention that the coastal communities
summary of forced eviction in seven major cities of themselves left the coastal areas. Within the city, the
India, which have been covered in detail are as follows: Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (TNSCB) and
public works department (PWD) have identified 8164
Delhi slum families who reside on the banks of major city
The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the waterways like Adiyar, Cooum and B’Canal. The
Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) have evicted government is intending to evict these families as they
27,000 families from the Yamuna Pushta strip to ‘beautify’ feel that the communities pose a hindrance to the de-
the place for tourist attraction. A study conducted by the silting operations of the PWD.
HRLN team reveals that the residents of the resettlement
sites are in extremely poor conditions. The living expenses Kolkata
are high and they are not able to meet these expenses Several thousand families in the South 24-Paraganas
from their meagre incomes. Most of the residents are of district in West Bengal are threatened of evictions. A 21-
the opinion that they were better off in the slums in Delhi kilometre road expansion project has been planned along
than in the resettlement sites on the city outskirts. the Budge-Budge Trunk Road. An estimated 20,000-
30,000 families currently reside along this stretch of road
Mumbai and will be rendered homeless by the expansion project.
The report focuses on the city’s most ruthless and massive No prior legal notices have been served on these families.
demolitions, which had occurred from December 2004 A 'progressive' Kolkata has witnessed one of the most
to February 2005. The Maharashtra unit of the Congress atrocious forced evictions by the local and state authorities
party, during earlier elections, had promised the extension on the one hand and demonstrations of tough public
of the cut-off-date to year 2000. The NAPM, in resistance from the working class community on the
collaboration with the local organisations in Mumbai, other hand. Left-ruled West Bengal is the only state in
had played a vital role in the campaign against the forced the country, which has neither any provision nor an
evictions. A chronology of the events that took place alternative land or accommodation facility for those who
during the forced evictions has vivid descriptions. Ms are being evicted.
Deepika D’souza exposes the myths of the policymakers
Hyderabad
and ground reality situation of the housing scenario. Mr
The twin-city of Hyderabad-Secunderabad used to
PK Das, an architect and social activist, proposes concrete
have hundreds of lakes but now there are only 170
solutions to defuse the habitat crisis.
lakes left. The administration and private builders have
Chennai encroached upon the waterbodies all across the city,
Tsunami created a natural process of dehousing. On resulting in floods. The next development disaster that
December 26, 2004, the entire coast of Tamil Nadu is on the offing is the Mussi River Development Plan
(xiii)
project that will displace some 12,000 families. The the interest of the poor. Dr K Shanmugavelayutham
local authorities in the city have already evicted numerous proposes strategies to combat the forced evictions.
houses on the pretext of urban renewal and
The National Urban Renewal Mission
beautification programme. The hi-tech city has a
This section provides brief background of the Jawaharlal
sizeable homeless population, most of them belonging
Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM)
to the working class. policies and its programmes in 63 major cities. It
describes the genesis of the JNNURM that took place
Visakhapatnam during the pervious regimes. Mr Lalit Batra exposes the
In the fast developing port city and the second largest politics behind the mission guided by the ‘principles’ of
city in the state of Andhra Pradesh, Visakhapatnam, globalisation and the policy of so-called liberalisation.
the administration is grossly violating the costal
regulation zone (CRZ), thus displacing large number Pro-poor city planning
of the fishing community people as well as large- This chapter reflects Rajeev John George’s views on
scale evictions within the city. ‘pro-poor city planning’, a compilation of his
contributions in the workshops and seminars and his
Ahmedabad research papers. It provides pragmatic solutions for
In recent times, the increasing spectre of communal resolving the housing crisis in urban areas within the
violence has led to a sharp polarisation between the legal framework.
Hindus and Muslims in the city. A beautification
programme, the Sabarmati Riverfront Development The international instruments
Advocate SH Iyer reviews the latest judgments on right
Project, threatens the slumdwellers in Ahmedabad. The
to housing followed by national laws and policies. Ms
aim of the project is to grab the urban space presently
Binda Sinha has compiled extensively on the
being used by the poor inhabitants for commercial international instruments, UN treaties and guidelines
use. Some forty thousand odd families are likely to be followed by the housing rights case laws. Mr Milloon
displaced, of whom 80 percent are Muslims and the Kothari, special UN rapporteur, recommends on
rest are members of other backward classes (OBCs) ‘development-based evictions and displacement’. The
and scheduled castes (dalits). concluding two chapters suggest the list of the demands
for the urban poor housing drafted as the Delhi
Critique on the housing policies Declaration during the India Habitat Campaign in
Mr Indu Prakash Singh focuses on the homeless people, October 2004 and the World Charter of Right to the City,
describing that the domestic policy climate is against initiated at the World Social Forum in Porto Alegré.
(xiv)
Eviction Watch India - II
section one
city overviews
Introduction
India had 1027 million people in 2001 with an urban even these areas were encroached upon by government
population of 285 million or 28 percent of the and by affluent sections.
population1. The decadal growth rate (1991-2001) was
21.35 percent with the urban growth rate touching 31.13 In 1974, the central government enacted the Urban Land
percent2. There are 400 million children. Sixty million of (Ceiling & Regulation Act) purporting to acquire in public
them are under the age of six, living below the poverty interest all land holdings above a particular ceiling at virtually
line. There are 11 million street children. The minimum no cost to the exchequer. The lands thus acquired were to
estimates of child labour stand at 11 million. Fifty percent be used for site and service schemes where the poor were
of the city populations are in slums though they possess to pay minimal amounts in return for a small plot of land
less than five percent of land. In 2000, the housing and basic services. Incremental housing was the norm where
shortage was 41 million units3. the poor could first build a tiny core structure and overtime
expand. Thirty thousand acres of prime urban land in the
Delhi cities of India thereafter became available virtually free for
The national capital city of Delhi, with a population close housing the urban poor4. Builders and others began to
to 13 million, has seen wave after wave of brutal covet this property. The Act was then subject to fierce
demolition of the slums. About 35 percent of the criticism in media and was ultimately sabotaged by the
population resides in over one thousand slum colonies. builders, lobby. From the land vesting in the government
This population grows by the day as the rural poor, only 7000 acres was taken possession of and out of this
mainly from the northern states affected by drought, pour only about 1000 acres was actually developed for housing.
into the city. From the time of the partition of the country Exploiting the loopholes in the Act, the land acquired was
into India and Pakistan and the first wave of immigrants handed back to the owners. The government of India
to Delhi, the migration has gone on unabated. In 1957, repealed the Act in 2000.
the Delhi Development Act came into force. In 1961,
the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) was formed With the repeal of the Act, disappeared any possibility
to provide adequate housing for the residents of Delhi. of housing the poor in the urban areas.
In 1962, the first Delhi Master Plan was formulated. In With the declaration of the internal Emergency by the
this Master Plan land was set aside for housing what was central government in 1975 came a wave of evictions
called the economically weaker sections (EWS). The areas and three quarter of million people had their homes
set aside were inadequate for the simple reason that 70 bulldozed 5 . Some of them were relocated on the
percent of the Delhi residents live in dwellings that are periphery of the city. But the evictions gave rise to grave
well below the minimum housing norms. Nevertheless, discontent together with other factors. The demolition
* Colin Gonsalves is a senior Supreme Court lawyer and a human rights activist. He is the founder-director of the Human Rights Law
Network, India
1. http://www.censusindia.net
2. United Nations, World Urbanisation Prospects: The 1999 Revision (2000) in Brocheroff M, An Urbanising World: Population Bulletin,
Vol 55(3), September 2000
3. Vagale LR – (2000), Housing and urban development authorities laws in Bangalore, Housing Legislation in India
4. Geoffrey Payne, Urban land tenure and property rights in developing countries a review – Section III. National policy issue – p – 12,
Intermediate Technology publications, London, 1997
5. Farce in the Capital – Relocation of slums, EWI, January 2003, First report, Combat Law Publication
5
courtesy The Hindu
Children displaced from Yamuna Pushta home
of slums led very quickly to the downfall of the Congress The relocations were not done in most cases. Families
in the general elections. But after a short break the lost their identity cards in the demolitions and fires and
demolitions continued irrespective of the party in power. were unable to make applications for alternative sites.
The Muslims were told that they would not be given
The second Master Plan for Delhi was finalised somewhere alternative accommodation unless they had their police
in 1986 and the third draft Master Plan was released in verification done ostensibly because the government
April 2006. This draft identifies slum clusters as the single considered all Muslims to be potentially from Pakistan
biggest challenge to making the city slum free. or Bangladesh and in any case, anti-national. Thousands
The Commonwealth Games, proposed to be held in of families were unable to get the place at the relocated
Delhi in 2010, saw the largest ever displacement from sites many miles away from the city.
Delhi starting from the year 20006. There are no records The relocated sites were basically dumping grounds for
available of the number of homes demolished, but human beings. Stagnant water became the breeding ground
NGOs estimate that over 200,000 people have been for mosquitoes. Toilets were not constructed and people
evicted. From the Yamuna Pushta area 150,000 people were forced to defecate in the open. The tubewells sunk
were brutally evicted in phases in order to create parks for drinking water threw up brackish water that was not
and fountains. This population was overwhelmingly potable. Water then had to be supplied through tankers,
Muslim giving rise to allegations that the demolitions had which came to the colonies infrequently leading to
a communal flavour to them. There were many complaints stampedes. The resettlement colonies were many miles
that the police had set fire to the huts while evicting families. away from the places of employment but bus services
The homes where the disabled stayed were broken with were not available. To make the matters worse, the bus
equal ferocity. Notices of the eviction were rarely given fares to and from work were so exorbitant that it was just
and families were caught unawares while the men were as good to stay at home. Unemployment was widespread.
at work. They would return to see their homes in ruin Children discontinued their education due to lack of
with their children sitting on top of the debris. Schools schools. There were no hospitals in the area and the public
were smashed leaving children without any chance of health systems that existed were understaffed and without
continuing with their education. There were reports of medicines. Open drains were filled with filth. Ration shops
the aged and infirm persons dying inside the houses when providing subsidised grain for those below the poverty
the bulldozers crashed through. line remained closed most of the time.
7. Almitra H Patel & others vs UOI & others (2000 2 SCC 679)
8. Sabastain PA – (2000), crushed homes, Lost Lives: The story of the demolitions in the Sanjay Gandhi National Park, IPHRC
Mumbai
9. Bulldozing Rights, A Report on the Forced Evictions & Housing Policies for the poor in Mumbai, June 2005
10. Child rights meeting in Mandala on May 25, 2006, Maju Varghese, YUVA, Eviction Watch
11. McKinsey “Vision Mumbai”: Transforming Mumbai into a world class city, 2003
12. MUTP, Inspection Panel Excerpt report, December 21, 2005
13. An impact assessment of R&R implementation for the MUTP - TISS report
14. TN state & governments in developing Rail facilities: A case Study of Chennai in India – T Anantha Rajan, V Shanmuga Sundaram,
S Ponnu Swamy and K Kumar
15. Shelter Rights in Chennai by Dr K Shanmugavelayutham, paper presentation on behalf of the Chennai Slum Dwellers Rights
Movement, May 2005
16. Memorandum to Chief Minister, Tamil Nadu, January 2005 (Annexure – IV)
17. Dasgupta Keya – (2002), Eviction in West Bengal – A report on the People’s Commission on Eviction and displacement, (2002) Kolkata
18. The 10th December Carnage - Strategies to Combat Forced Evictions, 2003, Combat Law, P - 23
19. Memorandum on Bellilious Park, Kolkata Report, by Kirity Roy
20. India: New Eviction case in the name of road expansion, West Bengal (http://foodjustice.net/ha/mainfile.pha/ha/marnfile.pha.)
21. Dr Anthoniraj Thumma, In Deep Waters…CHATRI publications, Dec 2000
22. WP 17777/85, Andhra Pradesh High Court
23. Grabbing Urban Poor Habitat – Sabarmati Riverfront Project, CL vol. 3 issue 3
24. Urban Renewal Mission: Whose agenda? People ’s Democracy vol xxix no 49, December 4, 2005
25. Poverty & Vulnerability in Indore, Oxfam urban Poverty Research Report, August 1999
26. George Deikun, Mission Director, USAID India – at the national media conclave “Globalising Indian cities: Partnership for change
27. Page 12, CMP, May 2004
28. While most European states adopt a dualist system with respect to incorporation of international law, former countries from the Soviet
bloc have been much more willing to directly incorporate human rights treaties, international customary laws and general principles
of international law within their constitutions and thereby permit judicial application. See, for example, the constitutions of Latvia and
Estonia. A similar trend is evident in Latin America
29. Maganbhai vs Union of India, AIR 1969 SC 783 (1969). The Supreme Court stated: ‘By Article 73, subject to the provisions of the
Constitution, the executive power of the Union extends to the matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws. Our
Constitution makes no provision making legislation a condition of the entry into an international treaty in times either of war or peace.
The executive power of the Union is vested in the President and is exercisable in accordance with the Constitution. The Executive is
qua the State competent to represent the State in all matters international and may by agreement, convention or treaties incur
obligations which in international law are binding upon the State. But the obligations arising under the agreement or treaties are not by
their own force binding upon Indian nationals. The power to legislate in respect of treaties lies with Parliament under Entries 10 and 14
of List I of the Seventh Schedule. But making of law under that authority is necessary when the treaty or agreement operates to restrict
the rights of citizens or others or modifies the laws of the State. If the rights of the citizens or others which are justiciable are not
affected, no legislative measure is needed to give effect to the agreement or treaty….If, in consequence of the exercise of executive
power, rights of the citizens or others are restricted or infringed, or laws are modified, the exercise of power must be supported by
legislation: where there is no such restriction, infringement of the right or modification of the laws, the Executive is competent to
exercise the power
30. Gramophone Company of India Limited v. Birendra Pandey AIR 1984 SC 677
31. Apparel Export Promotion Council vs AK Chopra,1999 (1) SC 756
32. The Court stated: ‘In the absence of domestic law occupying the field, to formulate effective measures to check the evil of sexual
harassment of working women at all work places, the contents of International Conventions and norms are significant for the purpose
of interpretation of the guarantee of gender equality, right to work with human dignity in Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the
Constitution and the safeguards against sexual harassment implicit therein. Any International Convention not inconsistent with the
fundamental rights and in harmony with its spirit must be read into these provisions to enlarge the meaning and content thereof, to
promote the object of the constitutional guarantee.’ Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan, 1997 (5) Scale 453 at para. 7. Available at
www.supremecourtonline.com/cases/2447.html
33 See, for example, SP Gupta vs Union of India & Another [1981] (Supplementary) SCC 87; where the Court held that where a legal
wrong or a legal injury is caused to a person or to a determinate class of persons by reasons of violation of any constitutional or legal
provision or without authority of law or any such legal wrong or legal injury or illegal burden is threatened, and any such person or
determinate class of persons is by reason of poverty or disability or socially or economically disadvantaged position unable to
approach the Court for relief, any member of the public or social action group can maintain an application for an appropriate direction,
order or writ in the High Court under Art 226 and in case of breach of any fundamental right of such person or class of person, in this
Court under Art 32 seeking judicial redress for the legal wrong or injury caused to such person or determinate class of persons. This
Court also held that procedure being merely a hand- maiden of justice it should not stand in the way of access to justice to the weaker
sections of Indian humanity and therefore where the poor and the disadvantaged are concerned who are barely eking out a miserable
existence with their sweat and toil and who are victims of an exploited society without any access to justice, this Court will not insist
on a regular writ petition and even a letter addressed by a public spirited individual or a social action group acting pro bono publico
would suffice to ignite the jurisdiction of this Court.
34. Ratlam Municipality vs Vardichand and Others, AIR 1980 SC 67. Residents within part of Ratlam Municipality, lacked sanitation and
brought legal action against the Municipality requesting that drain pipes be constructed. The Municipality claimed a lack of funds. The
Magistrate gave orders that the Municipality had to draft a plan within six months. After the High Court approved the order, the
Municipality appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court upheld the order and directed the Municipality to take immediate
action within its statutory powers. This included construction of sufficient public latrines and drains and provision of water supply, the
Supreme Court held that the plea of financial stringency by the municipal body is no defence for its failure to fulfil its statutory
obligations. This Court held that “The plea of the municipality that notwithstanding the public nuisance, financial inability validly
exonerates it from statutory liability has no juridical basis. The criminal procedure code operates against statutory bodies and others
regardless of the cash in their coffers, even as human rights under Part III of the Constitution have to be respected by the State
regardless of budgetary provision. Otherwise, a profligate statutory body or pachydermic governmental agency may legally defy
duties under the law by urging in self-defense a self-created bankruptcy or perverted expenditure budget. That cannot be.” Further,
it held that “Decency and dignity are non-negotiable facets of human rights and are a first charge on local self governing bodies.”
35. http/www.censusindia.net
36. A non-political voluntary organisation, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru as the President and Gulzarilal Nanda, Union
Minister, as Chairman, commenced work to enlist public cooperation for India’s planned development.
37. Farce in the Capital –Relocation of slums, Page 26, Eviction Watch India, January 2003
17
Emergency period city. But since 1990s evictions of the poor totally
In 1977, during the period of internal Emergency, the disconnected them from the mainstream economy of
Delhi administration started evicting the poor working the city. Those landless labourers and marginal farmers
class communities from their residences. According to from northern India, who could no longer survive in
official figures, 0.75 million people were evicted from their villages and fled to Delhi, have ultimately been
the city and relocated on the then city periphery near the trapped here. The Delhi authorities have dumped them
industrial areas. No structural support or economic into a no-man’s land between the city and the
incentives were provided during these operations. Most countryside. They are neither wanted in the city nor needed
of the evictees, who were compulsorily relocated near in the countryside. This vicious cycle of forced eviction,
the industrial belt, had no technical skills. Consequently, compulsory relocation and intrusion back into the city
they returned to the city for employment opportunities. continues without any major breakthrough in resolving
the housing shortage in the national capital.
New economic policy of 1990s
Since 1990s, the second wave of forced evictions in the City Master Plan pro-poor initiatives38
capital took place due to the new economic policy. Local The Town Planning Organisation (TPO) under the
authorities in Delhi decided that foreign investors would guidance of the Ford Foundation experts prepared the
prefer a ‘clean and orderly’ environment, at least in the first Delhi Master Plan, which was notified in 1962 for
relevant parts of the centre of the city. The wish to clean the next 20 years and the DDA became its implementing
up and beautify the central city was based on the perception agency. The plan had proposed to earmark “reasonable
that slums were an unhealthy eyesore and a nuisance. areas in several zones for the low income groups who
migrate to Delhi throughout the year from rural areas”.
A comparative study of the forced evictions during 1960s- The programme was meant for improving environmental
1970s and in 1990s will reveal their changing effects on conditions in already existing slums. The basic emphasis
the poor. In 1960s, Delhi was a rather small city. Gradually, of the First Master Plan was to minimise the gap between
many landless labourers and marginal farmers from north different socio-economic groups living in different areas.
migrated to the capital. In 1960s-1970s, Delhi
administration allowed the poor working class to earn a The Master Plan even issued directives to colonisers and
living in the city centre and remain connected with the government departments to reserve 25 percent of the
The Ambedkar Awas Yojana, launched in 1989, has a backlog of 2,883 registrants against the cumulative
figure of 20,000.
Under both the above schemes there is a total backlog of about 14,440 units. According to the DDA, over
35 lakh people live in the slums and unauthorised colonies, devoid to civic amenities.
In Delhi, there is an estimated shortage of more than four lakh housing units against a lakh in 2001. By
2021, as much as 24 lakh units will be required to meet the demand. A sizeable backlog of 8,668 and
2,883 in respect of the New Pattern Registration Scheme (NPRS) still exists with the DDA. Even after
two-and-a-half decades – the NPRS was launched in 1979 – the bonafide registrants under this scheme
are still awaiting allotment, the parliamentary standing committee on urban development observed in its
report presented in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on August 2, 2005.
The density of population has multiplied over the decades and risen from 274 persons per square kilometre
in 1901 to 1,176 in 2001. The capital alone gets over five lakh migrants from across the country annually
out of which 30 to 40 percent end up as squatters or settle in the slums.
38. Managing Urban Poverty, Dr Sabir Ali, Managing slums in Delhi: Uppal Publishing House, New Delhi, 2006
39. Hindustan Times, Slums to be relocated, September 16, 2005
40. The Pioneer, Housing policy ignores urban poor, September 19, 20
41. Hazard Centre, The Yamuna Pushta Evictions: What happened to those who were not assigned plots? Dec 2004
Plight of homeless persons42 The existing night shelters are able to provide shelter to
One of the most inhuman acts was an attack in one of less than five percent of the homeless people in our cities.
the night shelters conducted by the authorities of Delhi The overwhelming majority of the homeless people are
on October 16, 2004. At Palika Hostel, the police and exposed to remorseless winds and lashing rains. Although
NDMC staff entered at 7.30 am and forcibly evicted all homeless people are categorised as high vulnerable
women, their children. In 2002, the NDMC had signed group, but women, children and destitutes are the most
an agreement with the NGOs to start the shelter in a vulnerable. The Tenth Plan (2002-2007) document agrees
four-storey unused building by providing shelter to 300 that the programme of constructing night shelters requires
women, children, and disabled. radical rejuvenation. Establishment of special night
shelters for shelterless women and children will be a focal
150 NDMC staff along with a few policemen in civil area for the Tenth Plan, this document says, but there is
uniform stormed into the shelter home and assaulted little evidence so far.
42. Homeless in Delhi, Frontline; Annie Zaidi, January 01 –14, 2005
43. Indian Express, Cast out in the cold: January 16, 2006
44. The Times of India, New Delhi, India, January 27, 2004, “SC to Come Out With Law on Right to Shelter”
45. Asian Age, Slumdwellers must get law protection: VP, October 5, 2005
46. Dr Sabir Ali, Managing Slums in Delhi, Managing Urban Poverty (page 446) – Uppal Publising House, 2005
47. Big trouble in Little Tibet, but govt to the rescue by Sharma Nidhi, The Times of India, New Delhi, July 4, 2006 p. 8
48.‘Protest against evictions’ The Hindu, New Delhi, July 4, 2006, p. 4
Rehabilitation no solution
Bedoshruti Sadhukhan*
I
n the past few years, there has been a spate of slum on September 27, 2005 and January 8, 2006. The visits
demolitions in the city of Delhi, with the Supreme included ten sites located in Narela, Holambi Kalan and
Court justifying the action citing reasons of Bawana, where oustees of slum demolitions had been
‘development’ of the city. In most cases of demolitions, relocated. In all these sites, the residents were living in
none of the provisions of law with regard to demolitions inhuman conditions, with extremely poor conditions of
was followed. sanitation, water supply, education, electric supply, health
care facilities, etc. The following sites were visited: (i)
The demolitions are carried out in atrocious circumstances, Pocket 8, Sector 5, Narela; (ii) Pocket 14, Sector 5, Narela;
sometimes without notice and the inhabitants are thrown (iii) Pocket 4, Sector A/ 6, Narela; (iv) Pocket 11, Sector
out of their homes to a resettlement site. Often this site is A/ 6, Narela; (v) Pocket 7, Sector 10, Narela; (vi)
a temporary place to stay, known as a transit camp, from Gangaram Colony; (vii) Swarna Jayanti Vihar; (viii) Metro
where the people would again be relocated to some other Vihar; (ix) Holambi Kalan; and (x) JJ colony, Bawana.
place and at another time. The conditions of these transit
camps are unfit for human habitation. Sometimes, the Seven of these ten slum rehabilitation sites were set up at
people are not even provided with a shelter to protect various times, most of them five to eight years back, by
the DDA alone and rest by the slum and JJ department
themselves from rain or sun. Most of the resettlement
of the Delhi government and MCD. Out of these sites,
sites do not have supply of water or electricity or proper
Holambi Kalan and Bawana have been set up within last
sanitary facilities.
three-four years. In fact, two of them, Gangaram Colony
To assess the living conditions of the rehabilitation sites and Swarna Jayanti Vihar, were set up more than eight
in and around Delhi, visits were conducted to these sites years back. The people shifted there are a mixture of the
population of different slums. The new dwellers are still
regarded as outsiders by the original population of the
resettlement areas. The new ones regularly face
discrimination in various aspects of their lives, including
access to basic facilities like drinking water or medical
treatment. Even children of the new dwellers are
discriminated against in schools. Besides, the main
problems of basic civic amenities remain unresolved. The
sites face problem of access to drinking water, sanitation,
drainage, and educational and medical facilities.
On top of it all, the municipality also does not clean the
premises regularly, leading to health risks for the
inhabitants. The sites are located very far away from the
main city, which is their place of employment, and do
Condition of a resettlement site outside Delhi not have proper facilities of transportation.
* Ms Bedoshruti Sadhukhan has been with the Human Rights Law Network's Environmental Justice Initiative
25
The nearby industrial area provides jobs to these people as this site from places like Red Fort, Vijay Ghat, Shanti
labourers. In spite of this, there is an acute shortage of Van, Sanjay Amar Colony, Indira Colony, Gautampuri,
jobs for these people. Earlier, they were mostly staying Pushta, etc. There are five blocks in this site.
close to their places of work, in the city, but after being Land allotment
removed to faraway places, they often have to travel to In the pockets of Narela, there are three sizes of plots:
and from the city for their work. This costs them time and 22 sqm, 18 sqm and 12 sqm. The people have had to
money, both of which are precious to them. pay varying amounts of money for these plots.
A brief overview of the resettlement sites In Pocket 8 of Sector 5, there are around 888 land plots
In Narela, five pockets were visited, in different sectors out of which 710 have been allotted to different families.
These included: (i) Pocket 8, Sector 5; (ii) Pocket 14, Sector The sizes of the land plots are 12 sqm. These plots are on
5; (iii) Pocket 4, Sector 6; (iv) Pocket 11, Sector 6; and (v) leasehold for 15 years. These families had to pay Rs 7000
Pocket 7, Sector 10. for 12 sqm plots. In pocket 14, there are around 501 land
plots of 12 sqm and the plots are on leasehold for ten
The Narela site had been set up by the slum development years. There also, the people had to pay Rs 7000 for 12
department and DDA. In sqm plots.
the sites visited, the residents
The water which is supplied
were living for six years, In Pocket 4 of Sector 6, there are
except in Pocket 4, Sector 6,
though the common taps is unfit around 1326 plots out of which 800
where they have been living for drinking. The tankers come plots have been already allotted to
for two to five years. The once a day, and if the tankers do different families. The plots vary in
people have been relocated not come, the people have to get size from 18 sqm to 12½ sqm and
in these pockets from various water from other areas. There are are on lifetime leasehold. These
parts of the city, including four tankers for 1600 families people had to pay Rs 5000 for 12½
Minto Road, Nehru sqm plots and Rs 7000 for 18 sqm
Stadium, Bal Bhawan, Laxmi Nagar, Lodhi Road, plots. For corner plots, people had
Pashchim Vihar, Janakpuri, Minto Road, Okhla, Medical, to pay, Rs 14000 for 12½ sqm plots and Rs 20,000 for
Safdarjung, Shahdara, ITO, CGO Complex, Lajpat 18 sqm plots. Moreover, almost a hundred families have
Nagar, Mayapuri, Cantonment, Janakpuri, Minto Road, not been allotted land plots yet and have been living in
Paschimpuri and others. temporary shelters and shacks for more than a year. In
Pocket 11, there are around 1600 plots allotted to
The Swarna Jayanti Vihar site was set up by the slum and different families. The plots vary in size from 22 sqm to
JJ Department and MCD. There the residents have been 18 sqm to 12½ sqm and are on leasehold for lifetime
living for seven years. The residents have been shifted lease. The people had to pay Rs 7,000 for their plots of
from Chanakyapuri, Nehru Stadium, Greater Kailash, 18 sqm and Rs 5,000 for plots of 12½ sqm. In this sector,
Babu Park, Kotla, Ashok Vihar and others. there is very bad planning of the housing plots. The
planning shows complete lack of sensitivity to the privacy
The DDA set up the Gangaram Colony. The residents of the people. The people are forced to stay in small
are living there for more than six years and have been rooms, with common courtyards, which is a constant
shifted from Connaught Place, Janakpuri, Baraf Khana, reason for quarrels among the people.
ITO, Gangaram, Rajinder Nagar, and other areas. In Pocket 7 of Sector 10, there are more than 1000 land
The Metro Vihar, Phase I, A Block was set up by the DDA plots, which have been allotted to different families. These
land plots are of 22 sqm or 18 sqm and on leasehold for 10
and the residents have been living there for more than five
years. These people had to pay Rs 7,000 each for these plots.
years. They had been shifted to this place from all over Delhi,
Minto Road, Mal Road, Chawlapuri, Radhu Place, Ashok In Swarna Jayanti Vihar, there are more than 2500 plots
Vihar, Lal Bagh, Barabagh, Janakpuri, and other places. allotted to different families. The plots vary in size from
22½ sqm to 12½ sqm. There are around 2300 plots of
The residents in Holambi Kalan A Block, set up by the size 22½ sqm and 214 plots of size 18 sqm. In Gangaram
DDA, have been living there for more than two years Colony, there are 490 plots of 22½ sqm. In Metro Vihar,
They have been shifted to this place from places like Rohini. there are 1600 land plots of 18 sqm to 12½ sqm. In
Holambi Kalan A Block, there are 700 land plots, of
The JJ Colony, Bawana was set up by the slum and JJ 12½ sqm. In Bawana, there are 15,000 land plots allotted
Department and the MCD. The residents have been living to different families in the various blocks. The plots are
there for more than two years and had been shifted to of the size of 18 sqm and 12 sqm.
27 Rehabilitation no solution
potable, and people depend on tanker water supply. The Although the residents have to pay money for using them,
water which is supplied through the common taps is unfit the private contractors do not maintain them in a proper
for drinking and utilised by the residents only for washing way. The people find it difficult to pay for toilets, as most
clothes. The tankers come once a day, and even that is not of them are labourers or vendors earning meager sums.
a surety. If the tankers do not come, the people have to
get water from other areas. There are four tankers, which The toilets are in a dilapidated condition and are not
properly cleaned. The main problem is that most of the
come to the area with 1600 families. These tankers stand
sites don’t have sewer lines, therefore, cleaning the toilets
only in front of the houses of infuential families or
is a problem. The people have to use these filthy toilets
‘pradhans’ of the area. There is such a rush for the water
because there is no other option. Moreover, the people
that often there are fights over it. More than 30 FIRs have can hardly afford to pay for sanitation. The children have
been lodged regarding such fights. The water supplied is to go outside in the fields to ease themselves, and there is
often yellow and therefore not potable. filth, human excreta and dirt everywhere. Moreover, the
In Sector 10 Pocket 7, the water is supplied through toilets remain closed during the night and are open only
common taps or tankers that come once a day. However, in the day. It causes a lot of problems to the people
these tankers only supply water at the house of the when they fall ill or need to use the toilet at night.
pradhans or some such influential persons, while the rest There are open drains in the site, and most of them have
of them are left out. A few of the residents, who can choked with filth and dirt. There is no sewer facility in
afford it, have got private borewells for individual use at the area. The garbage is not cleaned by the municipal
their own expense. In certain areas of this pocket, which sweepers and is dumped anywhere in the streets, so that
is newly built, there is no supply of drinking water yet. the whole place has a rotten stench. There are not enough
In Swarna Jayanti Vihar, there are four common taps, sweepers to clean the colonies. Also, there is regular water
which get water only for a few hours in the morning and logging in the colonies of Bawana and Holambi Kalan.
evening, and cater to 2500 families. In Metro Vihar, there In Sector 5, Pocket 8 of Narela, there are two common
are five common taps, getting water twice a day to cater toilets and each family is charged Rs 30 per month for
to 1600 families. In Gangaram Colony, the water is
the toilet facilities. In Pocket 14, there is only one common
supplied from two borewells. In Holambi Kalan, water
toilet and each family is charged Rs 100 per month. In
is supplied through hydrants. In Bawana, there is water
supply through borewells and hydrants, getting water for none of the sites, the toilets were in a functional condition.
three hours in the morning and evening. In Sector 6 and 10, the people are charged Re 1 for each
use of the toilet. In Swarna Jayanti Vihar also, the people
The quality of water is poor and often causes health are charged Re 1 for every use. In Bawana, the toilets
problems in Swarna Jayanti Vihar, Gangaram Colony and charge Re 1 for each use of the toilet and Rs 5 to Rs 10
Metro Vihar. In many places, the people are forced to use for washing and bathing each time.
unhealthy water due to non-availability of any other option.
In Bawana, there is severe shortage of water in summers, In Gangaram Colony, the atrocious living conditions are
and people have to use stream water at that time. reflected in the fact that even after six years of residing in
the colony, the people have no functional toilets. They
Electricity
In all the sites in Narela, Swarna Jayanti Vihar, Gangaram
Colony, Metro Vihar, Holambi Kalan, there is regular
electricity supply, but the supply is through private
contractors. The residents had to pay Rs 1,870 for the
meters. The residents claim that these meters run very
fast and they have to cope with very high electricity bills.
Because of such high bills, the people often draw electric
lines from one house to another and there is rampant
theft of electricity. In some areas of Pocket 7 of Sector
10 in Narela, there is no supply of electricity.
Sanitation
All the sites lack proper sanitation facilities. The toilets are
unclean, broken down and often not in working order. Abuse of state power against the poor city inhabitants
29 Rehabilitation no solution
The taps in the resettlement colonies rarely supply the water
also given less quantity than what they are supposed to get, amenities. The living expenses are high, and they are not
such as five kg rice instead of 10 and 20 kg wheat instead able to meet these expenses from their meagre incomes.
of 25 kg. In a nutshell, the living costs are too high for the They are now placed in areas where they do not have
residents to have a decent meal. employment, and have to travel to far away places for
Conclusion their livelihood, and spend more than their income on
The site visits and interviews with the people at these living. Most of the residents were of the opinion that
places showed that the residents of the resettlements were they were better off in the slums in Delhi than in the
living in extremely poor conditions without basic resettlement sites.
49. <http://www.censusindia.net>
50. Mid Day, Every second person in Mumbai lives in a slum, January 9, 2006
31
Eviction scenario Sadly, the city has again witnessed one of the most ruthless
The Indian People’s Tribunal (IPT) report, Bulldozing and massive demolitions, which occurred from
Rights51 reveals that Mumbai’s first-ever forced evictions December 2004 to April 2006. Ms Medha Patkar, national
occurred in the 1950s, during the Congress regime. The coordinator of the NAPM, had played an active role in
evicted were rehabilitated in Mankhurd. The place was collaboration with many other organisations and slum
leaders against Mumbai’s forced eviction drive.
named Janata Colony. In 1976, this Janata Colony was
again displaced as the administration wanted to When the Congress party in Maharashtra refused the
construct staff quarters for the Bhabha Atomic Research electoral promise of cut-off date, Mumbai’s slum dwellers
Centre (BARC), as it was located next to the Janata got united and the administration had to witness stiff
Colony. These displaced slum dwellers were pushed resistance. The state chief minister declared that all slums
out a further five kilometres to Cheetah Camp. In order post - January 1, 1995, would be demolished and the
to create space inside the city, on both occasions the people who were evicted would never be rehabilitated.
government adopted the policy of pushing slum The demolition drive conducted from November 2004
dwellers outside the city limits.52 to February 2005 had rendered more than three hundred
thousand people homeless, just in the span of a few
In the earlier elections, the Congress party in Maharashtra months. Within the first 18 days, over 39,000 homes were
had promised the extension of the cut-off date to 2000. demolished, among the first was a large settlement with
This election promise played a big role for the Congress over 6,200 homes in Ambujawadi in Malad, a North-
to come to power in the state. The extension of the cut- Western suburb of Mumbai.54
off date has always been used as a ploy to get votes just
before the elections. McKinsey report55
During the chief ministership of Sushil Kumar Shinde in
The first census of slums was conducted in 1976. The
2003-04, Mumbai First (an organisation of the builders,
government decided that those who have been included
industrialists, and former senior bureaucrats) brought out
in the 1976 census would be held eligible for slum a development plan for Mumbai with the help of the
improvement, redevelopment or relocation schemes. The multinational consulting company, McKinsey, and insisted
concept of cut-off date thus came in. Once again in that the city be developed accordingly. The state government
1980, the government adopted the cut-off date. This adopted the plan, without any wider consultation or even
time no fresh census was taken, as it was difficult to consulting the state legislative assembly.
conduct census at such a large-scale. The electoral rolls
of the 1980s were, therefore, adopted as the base for The state government appointed a special officer, who was
determining eligibility. The same story was repeated in directly answerable to the chief minister. The McKinsey
1985 and again in 1990. In 1995, when the Shiv Sena- report had no plan for housing the poor. It rather advised
BJP coalition government came into power it declared that there be a reduction in the slums down to 10 percent,
January 1, 1995 as the cut-off date for providing free though the Maharashtra Housing Development Authority
housing to slum dwellers.53 (MHADA) stopped constructing low-cost houses in 1990
itself. The Mumbai First and related groups propounded
In the first edition of the EWI (First report, January 2003) the idea of ‘developing Mumbai’ on the pretext that there
an extensive report on the Sanjay Gandhi National Park are no lands available for real estate development.
evictions was one of the focal issues. This report
highlighted how around 86,000 houses, stretching from The McKinsey plan – “Vision Mumbai” was promoted
Pimpripada to Borivalli were targeted by the forest by Mumbai First, who took the lead, hands in glove with
officials. The Mumbai High Court and the state the builders and politicians for the massive evictions in
administration took the extreme step of using helicopters the city. The World Bank had also entered the scene to
and deploying even retired military officials and “Special ‘invest’ and share profit with the private business interest
Reserved Forces” to evict the poor unarmed inhabitants. groups (PBiGs), at the cost of the poor as well as the
51. Politics of Demolition, a report on Forced Evictions and Housing Policies for the Poor in Mumbai, Bulldozing Rights, Indian
People’s Tribunal on Environment and Human Rights, June 2005
52. Information regarding the history of the cut-off date was gathered from an unpublished Phd Thesis of Dr Jalinder Adsule, Professor
of Niketan College of Social Work as well as from a meeting with Mr Tinaikar, retired municipal commissioner of Mumbai
53. History of the cut-off date, Page 47, Politics of Demolitions, Bulldozing Rights
54. Indian Express, Mumbai Newsline front page, December, 25, 2005
55. The Mumbai makeover plan, Page 47, Politics of Demolitions, Bulldozing Rights
56. Indian People’s Tribunal on Environment and Human Rights, Bulldozing Rights, June 2005
58. Every child has a right to a home, Maju Varghese, Eviction Watch May 25, 2006 ([email protected])
6. Bangali Pura, Masjid Bunder, on the bridge 2. Kamraj Nagar, behind Kamraj Nagar Municipal
School, Ghatkopar East
7. Sitaram Mill Compound, Lower Parel
8. Kamla Nagar, Jasmine Mill Road, Dharavi 3. Netaji Nagar, behind Panjabi Chawl, Ghatkopar East
(OS India-NGO providing services)
9. Prakash Nagar, Near Machimar Colony, Mahim
10. Nanyaneshwar Nagar, Jer Bai Wadia Marg, Sewri 4. Annabhou Saathe Nagar, Along Mumbai Pune
Highway, Mankhurd
11. Madanpura, next to Byculla Fire Brigade office
5. Ramabai Ambedkar Nagar, Mulund Highway, next
Western suburbs to MHADA Colony,Mulund East
1. Siddharth Nagar, Mahada, behind Four Bunglows
RTO, Andheri West 6. Rafiq Nagar, Govandi East (Apnalaya - NGO
providing services)
2. Mangela Koliwada, Moragaon, Ruia Park, Near
Chandan Talkies, Andheri West 7. Shivaji Kutir, LBS Road Kurla
3. Sai Baba Nagar, behind Jan Shatabdi Hospital, 8. Mandala, Mumbai, Pune Highway, Mankhurd (Path
Kandivali West - NGO providing services)
4. Asmi Nagar No. 7, Malwani, Malad West 9. Indira Nagar, LBS Marg, Agra Road, Kurla
5. Rathodi Gaon, Malwani Church, Malwani Malad
10. Bhim Chhaya Nagar, Kanamwar Nagar, Vikroli (E)
West
Table – 4
P
ost widespread demolitions in the city on September city. Likewise, the panel experts recognise the difficult
20, 2005, the World Bank had received a letter from challenge in resettling an estimated 120,000 or more
Ms Medha Patkar and Mr Simpreet Singh detailing people in Mumbai.
serious problems with the MUTP works and their
implementation as number of the resettled households This was one of the largest urban resettlement projects
were facing with a set of post-resettlement problems. The that the World Bank had undertaken in India or elsewhere
World Bank had temporarily (except in China). According to the
suspended financial support to the report, the MUTP project intended
Mumbai Urban Transport Project for economic development and that
(MUTP). large numbers of people must
benefit from the project.
The MUTP is an ambitious road and
rail renewal plan, which involves the The World Bank Panel was
involuntary resettlement of more concerned with the number of
than 17000 households, and about complaints they were receiving from
2500 shops and small industrial units. the affected people who would be
About 14000 households have largely displaced by the project, they
already been moved to secure were being har med and the
dwellings. These people were among associated costs were being ignored.
the city’s poorest, most living along The MUTP began in 1995, as large
railway tracks in squalid and number of families would be
dangerously unhealthy conditions. displaced by the project, the WB
The World Bank had devoted high- prepared two separate but inter-
level attention to the project and had linked projects:
taken significant steps to try to bring
1) for transport infrastructure and
the project into compliance with its
2) for resettlement and rehabilitation
policies and procedures. The
inspection panel had received four The WB recognised that the projects
successive complaints for inspection involved significant risks when in
The MUTP Plan
related to the MUTP. 1999 a major policy shift was made
to combine the two projects into one project. The
The MUTP objectives resettlement and rehabilitation project became the sub-
The objectives of the Project was to “facilitate urban economic component of the infrastructure project. This resulted in
growth and improve quality of life by fostering the development major adverse implications especially on the resettlement
of an efficient and sustainable urban transport system including and rehabilitation part of the project related to both rail
effective institutions to meet the needs of the users in the Mumbai and road components.
Metropolitan Region”.
The WB had approached the local NGOs in the city to
The main objective of the project was to carryout implement the resettlement aspects of both components
improvement in the transport infrastructure of Mumbai of the project.
41
The US$940 million MUTP is supported by an IBRD The special advisers of the panel were Prof Michael
loan of US$463 million for the road and rail components Cernea, anthropologist and sociologist, Prof Alan Rew,
of the project and an IDA credit of US$79 million for anthropologist and sociologist, Prof Richard Fuggle,
resettlement. Disbursements to the IDA credit and the environmental scientist, and Dr Renu Modi, sociologist.
road component of the loan (US$150 million) have been Members, who were handling the investigation, were
suspended pending a resolution of issues outlined above. Eduardo Abbott, Anna Sophie Herken, Peter Lallas and
The IDA is the International Development Association, Zachary Liscow.
the concessional lending arm of the World Bank Group,
The project has three components: improvement of
and the IBRD is the International
Mumbai’s rail transport system,
Bank for Reconstruction and
Development, the Bank’s low- The MUTP fails to provide adequate improvement and extension of
the road-based transport system,
interest lending window. The income restoration and adequate
and resettlement and rehabilitation
closing date for both the loan resettlement arrangements. The of affected persons.
and the credit is June 30, 2008. shopkeepers fear of suffering
According to the project irreparable damage to their All four complaints for inspection
documents, the road-based businesses pertain to the proposed
transport component of the construction and improvement of
east-west connecting roads within
project amounts to US$183.02
the road-based transport component and to the proposed
million, with the IBRD loan financing US$150.47 million
resettlement and rehabilitation of persons affected by
of this. The resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R)
the road component.
component amounts to US$100.08 million, of which
the IDA credit finances US$79 million. The first three complaints concern the six km Santa Cruz-
Chembur Link Road (SCLR), while the last complaint
Four legal agreements are relevant to the project: The IBRD addresses similar came from the issues related to the 11
Loan Agreement, the IDA Development Credit Agreement; km Jogeshwari-Vikhroli Link Road (JLVR). The request
the Maharashtra Project Agreement, and the Mumbai Railway economically diverse people, representing low and
Vikas Corporation Project Agreement. All agreements were middleincome shopkeepers and other affected residents
signed on August 5, 2002. The Loan and Credit Agreements of Mumbai.
became effective on November 6, 2002.
Objections filed
The WB inspection panel team had released extensive
investigation report (223 pages) on the Mumbai Urban On April 28, 2004 the Inspection Panel received the first
Transport Project. This report was officially released on objections request related to the MUTP from the United
December 21, 2005. The project had affected about Shop Owners Association (USOA). These people are
120,000 persons (19,200 households) and 3000 shops small shop owners whose commercial premises are
located in the Kismat Nagar area, Kurla West, in the city
displaced from their present habitat and in some instances
of Mumbai.
from their source of livelihood.
The second objections was submitted by three
The Inspection Panel was formed in September 1993 by
organisations located in the city of Mumbai – the
the Board of Executive Directors of the WB to serve as
Hanuman Welfare Society, the Gazi Nagar Sudhar Samiti
an independent mechanism to ensure in the WB
and the Jai Hanuman Rahiwasi Sewa Sangh – on behalf
operations with respect to its policies and procedures.
of 350 residents living in the area known as Gazi Nagar
The Inspection Panel is an instrument for groups of two
in the Kurla West district.
or more private citizens which provides a link between
the Bank and the people who are likely to be affected by On November 29, 2004 the panel received another
the projects it finances. objection file by the Bharati Nagar Association on behalf
of the residents of Bharati Nagar.
The investigation team was assisted by the local NGOs,
national and state government officials in New Delhi and On December 23, 2004, the panel received a fourth
Mumbai, the MMRDA, SPARC, NSDF and SRS objection filed by Ekta Vyapari Jan Seva Sangh, on behalf
providing documents, discussing points of concern, and of residents and shopkeepers of Bandrekar Wadi,
facilitating the panel’s work. Bhavbani Chowk in the Jogeshwari district of Mumbai.
You may submit a Request in any language. A local non-governmental organisation (NGO), or another person
who represents you, can also submit a Request on your behalf. In exceptional circumstances, or if you have no
local representation, a foreign NGO or group may represent you. You may ask for your name to be kept
confidential by the panel.
If you are not satisfied by the response from the World Bank, you may immediately submit a Request for
Inspection to:
The Inspection Panel
1818 H Street, NW
Washington, DC 20433, USA
You can submit a Request to the panel even before the World Bank has approved financing for the project or
programme. Requests are not eligible when the loan and/or credit funding the project is closed, or if more than
95 percent of the funding has been disbursed.
establishing cooperatives and completing other post- measures for economic rehabilitation described in the
resettlement activities in the housing areas; strengthening resettlement action plan (RAP) were consistent with the
implementation capacity in the MMRDA; improving the provisions of the R&R policy. With regard to the grievance
dialogue and focusing on problem solving with shopkeepers; process, management acknowledged that communication
and strengthening the grievance redress procedures. of the grievance procedures may not have been adequate
With regard to the requesters’ allegations concerning income and that the grievance mechanism itself needs to be
erosion and restoration, management stated that the improved. The Bank rated safeguard management
performance as unsatisfactory, in part because of the managing resettlement must be developed during preparation
lack of timely handling of grievances. and adequate resources provided to the responsible
institutions. The organisation responsible for resettlement
This report concludes the panel’s investigation into the should be strengthened when entities executing infrastructure
matters alleged in the request for Inspection. The panel’s
or other sector-specific projects lack the experience and outlook
current chairperson, Edith Brown Weiss, led the
needed to design and implement resettlement… There also
investigation. Four expert consultants/ advisers on social may be considerable scope for involving the NGOs in
issues and environmental assessment assisted the panel in
planning, implementation and monitoring resettlement.”
the investigation. The report extensively examines the
merits of the claims presented in the requests. The TISS observations
An impact assessment report of R&R implementation
The investigation panel reviewed relevant project for the MUTP, the report observes the following factors:
documents and other materials from the Requesters, Bank The loss of job by 28.7 percent of additional family
staff, the MMRDA officials, NGOs, and other sources. members, mainly women domestic servants, as a
The panel interviewed the Bank staff in Washington and consequence of increased distance
in the Bank office in New Delhi, visited the project areas Disruption of women’s earning such as small jobs
on three occasions, met with the Requesters and other like selling vegetables or fish, due to the absence of
PAPs throughout the area, and met with local, state, and residential localities at the new sites
An increase in commuting charges, an average monthly
national authorities. The panel also gathered considerable increase of travel costs about Rs 158 per affected
data during its field visits to the project sites with which houshold, and
to evaluate the Requesters claims and conducted extensive An increase in expenses due to maintenance and society
interviews with the PAPs at selected sites. charges
Par 6 of OD 4.30 quotes: “The responsibility for resettlement The TISS also observed that… no systematic rehabilitation
rests with the borrower. The organisational framework for work has been initiated by the SPARC. “Our impression
Rehabilitation in disarray
60. Joint venture of State & National Governments in Developing Rail facilites: A Case Study of Chennai in India – T Anantha Rajan, V
Shanmuga Sundaram, S Ponnu Swamy and K Kumar
49 Rehabilitation in disarray
in Chennai. They were relocated 20 kilometres away from Rajakkamangakalam
Dideer Nagar. Those who were living in rented houses In the Rajakkamangakalam in Kanyakumari district,
before the tsunami calamity were not given alternate people were not been given temporary shelter even after
houses for settlement. They continue to live either in the two months of tsunami. However, the administration
dilapidated houses or in the open air in the same slum. did not forget to serve notices on them to give consent
to relocate them to a new place 500 metres away from
The place chosen for their resettlement has no drinking
the coastal area. But 99 percent of the families had firmly
water, transport, electricity, toilet and school facilities. said ‘no’ to the eviction proposal.
Kannagi Nagar and Kargil Nagar Maduravoyal
Marina beach fishing communities were shifted outside Tension gripped Maduravoyal in suburban Chennai as
of the city to Kannagi Nagar and Kargil Nagar. The the revenue officials arrived at Seikmaniyam and Iyappan
non-fishing dalit community from Srinivasapuram was Nagar to evict the residents from land, which they claimed
also sent to Kannagi Nagar near Thuraipakkam which is belonged to the government. The residents of the locality
on the outskirts of Chennai. protested, alleging that no notices had been issued to
them. Ambattur deputy commissioner reached the spot
When the residents of Kannagi Nagar, another seashore for a dialogue. The officials left the place after urging the
slum, protested against the compulsory relocation, the residents to vacate the area.
police brutally lathicharged them. Fifty one persons, Proposed secretriat at Marina Beach dropped
including 15 women, were arrested. The injured were Proposed new secretariat at Marina Beach, Chennai, was
not even given first aid and were straight away lodged in dropped by the Tamil Nadu government. The National
the jail. Most of the evicted families were dailywage earners Human Rights Commission announced this after
and their children have been forced to drop out from intervening in the matter in New Delhi on July 19, 2005.
the schools, as there was no school in the resettlement
area. In Kargil Nagar, a few kilometres down the road, The National Commission for Women held a public
there are around 2142 families. Srinivasapuram families hearing on the problems of Marina Coastal Fisherfolk
who had been rehabilitated at Kannagi Nagar and Kargil and other unorganised workers on May 21, 2003.
Nagar together have about 2700 residents. Though the
The coastal fishing communities have come together to
collector, S Chandramohan, had visited the site and to oppose the conversion of Marina Beach for the
promised the families that they would be relocated from purpose of foreign missions, five star hotels, etc., and
Kannagi Nagar and Kargil Nagar, Srinivasapuram. also to shift the government secretariat to the Marina.
The people in the neighbourhood slum, Srinivasapuram, The proposed plan, if implemented, would render nearly
have been served with eviction notices. But a few of one hundred thousand people displaced.
them have managed to seek the intervention from the Tsunami and the CRZ violations
Madras High Court, which has granted a temporary stay On December 26, 2004 tsunami created a natural process
against eviction. Similarly, their counterparts in Anna of eviction. The coast of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry
Nagar Kuppam in Royapuram in North Chennai bore unprecedented damages and destruction to lives
succeeded in getting a similar stay from forcible relocation and to the coastal economy and ecology.
10 km away from their traditional habitat. On February
18, 2005 a large number of revenue officials, including
the Chennai district collector, and police officials came
to Srinivasapuram and informed the residents that they
should vacate the area by February 24.
The people of Srinivasapuram, Pattanapakkam and
Kasimedu have been living in temporary shelters after
the tsunami washed away their huts. The Madras High
Court, in February 2005, restrained the state authorities
from forcibly evicting the tsunami-affected residents of
Srinivasapuram. Tsunami had washed away more than
50 people and hundreds of thatched huts in the region.
More than 4000 families were rendered homeless. Demolition site on the banks of Adiyar
51 Rehabilitation in disarray
Coastal yatra
On May 21, 2005 a Coastal yatra (campaign) was organised
from Vedaranyam and ended in Chennai on May 30, 2005.
The yatra was undertaken to focus public-governmental
attention on the need for people oriented and participatory
livelihood restoration, provision of housing organically
linked to livelihoods, to make appraisal of the WB-ADB
and UN Report on Post-tsunami Reconstruction
Programme and to create awareness among the coastal
people on their livelihood rights.
A site of poor inhabitants razed brutally Legal interventions
The Human Rights Law Network (Chennai) took an
traditional fishing sector does not contribute much to initiative to intervene legally, in collaboration with other
the GDP while aquaculture is making a substantial organisations. A PIL was filed in the Madras High Court
contribution. The plans for rehabilitation were drawn up on behalf of North Tamil Nadu Tsunami Relief and
under these assumptions – naturally, the fishing Rehabilitation Committee to stay the forced evictions
communities most affected by the tsunami have gained of fishermen community who were being forced to
little from the rehabilitation plan. leave their homes and move to temporary shelters, even
though their houses were not destroyed by the tsunami
Construct of compound wall 61 and were livable. There was no need for them to be
One of the so-called ambitious projects of the Tamil
moved to the temporary shelters. The court had granted
Nadu government to protect the seashores (not the people
interim relief and given an order for the stay of eviction
living there) from future tsunami attacks is to construct a
of the fishermen.
compound wall for the entire coastal distance of 1000
kilometres from Chennai to Kanyakumari! The central Conclusion
government headed by Dr Manmohan Singh has already The state government is blatantly trying to promote
come out with a draft New Environmental Policy aiming
so-called eco-tourism and allowing the corporate and
to liberalise the CRZs Notifications introduced in 1991.
Tsunami has thus struck the coastal areas in yet another multinational sectors to construct buildings after
manner; it has paved the way for privatisation of coastal forcibly evicting and relocating the people traditionally
areas and commercialisation of coastal zones. living along the seashores in the name of their
protection from future tsunami attacks. In fact, the
Costal community meeting62 CRZ nor ms explicitly state: “Construction/
The civil society organisations and the coastal communities
reconstruction of dwelling units between 200 and 500
held a meeting on February 28, 2005 in Padi, Chennai, to
campaign and advocate on the coastal rights front. metres of the High Tide Line is permitted so long as it
is within the ambit of traditional rights and customary
Major demands uses such as existing in fishing villages”.
1. The coast is the primary entitlement of the coastal
communities and they have usufructual rights to the coastal But, in contravention of this provision, the Tamil Nadu
land for the purposes of their livelihoods and residence. government had issued a letter dated on January 19, 2005
2. The government should take measures to reclaim the addressing the district collectors of 13 coastal districts in
CRZ zone-1 from existing encroachments in the form of Tamil Nadu to compulsorily relocate even those living
hotels, resorts, shrimp industries, mining industries, etc. within a 500 metre distance from the seashore and
3. The community must regain access to fishing nets, takeover the lands from the costal communities.
fishingcraft and other equipment, especially the beach Chennai Slum Dwellers Rights Movement, Pennurimai Iyakkam and HRLN,
based ones, which are essential for their livelihoods. Chennai unit contributed in finalising the Chennai report
61. Shelter Rights in Chennai by Dr K Shanmugavelayutham, paper presentation on behalf of the Chennai Slum Dwellers Rights Movement
62. State level NGO consultation on the Coastal Communities’ Right to the Coast Report of February 28, 2005
63. http://www.censusindia.net
53
‘development’. The organisation documented and city. Ever since the multilateral institution funded projects
researched people’s living and working conditions, started investing in heavy infrastructure through state
published reports and undertook public campaigns. agencies, the local inhabitants have been largely affected
and housing rights abuse has become a regular component
After a wave of brutal citywide evictions in May-June
of arbitrary state practice.
1983, Jai Sen, pointed out: “dehousing is as real and
constant a social process as housing , and the two are On September 22, 2001 an inquiry was held by the
interlinked. What is happening is no accident: the “People’s Commission on Eviction and Displacement”.
‘dehousing’ of poorer people – the seizure of their homes During the inquiry meeting, one of the evictees had
and their domestic security – is in directly questioned: “Why the brunt of development was
borne by the urban poor only
itself a process of relentless
when the benefits of such
impoverishment. The word in
development don’t reach them?”
Bengali that is most commonly used
by ordinary people in Kolkata for Operation sunshine
‘housing’ is – bashosthan, meaning ‘Operation sunshine’ was executed
‘a place to settle, to live’, as distinct in 1996 to evict hawkers from the
footpaths in Kolkata city. The first
from abashan, which is the term of operation of eviction was in
planners and builders meaning mere December 1996 in which 1834
buildings or ‘housing’ projects64 .” stalls were demolished and later
between 3500 and 4000 stalls. In
Eviction scenario
the year 2000, a similar operation
In the last couple of years, Kolkata
of eviction was followed at
witnessed one of the most brutal Gariahat, Kalighat and Lake
forced evictions by the local and Market.
state authorities on the one hand,
and demonstrations of tough Tolly’s Nala
public resistance from the poor Tolly’s Nala evictions were one of
working class community on the the brutal evictions in the city in
other. Though the 'propeople' Left Poor rickshaw puller of Kolkata which 1150 families were evicted
Front government has been ruling the state for almost and 20,000 people were displaced. On September 22, 2001,
three decades, it has been instrumental in perpetrating the ADB-sponsored project, was twofold: Dredging the
one of the worst housing rights abuses and has failed to canal under Ganga Action Plan Phase-II, and extending
provide adequate housing within the legal framework. the Metro Railway from Tollygunge to Garia in the south.
These projects were financed by the ADB to improve the
A sizeable population of the city is living in the slums, on drainage/sewerage of the canals, undertaken by the Kolkata
pavements, beside railway tracks, under bridges and along Municipal Corporation. Ucchhed Birodhi Jukta Mancha,
side canals. Habitable land has not yet been made available Kolkata — a forum of organisations — had built a strong
to these working class people at an affordable price within resistance in the city, by demanding rehabilitation, and setting
the legal framework. The inquiry team found one of the up of community kitchen at Garia.
highest displacements from the Kolkata metropolitan
region. Though these poor working class inhabitants had Inquiry into Tolly’s Nala evictions
ration cards and names in the voters’ lists. These sections People’s Commission on Eviction and Dispalcement was
constitute a stable vote bank of the political parties and held on September 22, 2002. The inquiry was held by Justice
yet they are under the threat of multiple forced evictions. R Sachar (retired) and Justice Moloy Sengupta (retired). Going
There are at present, second and third generation of local through the dispositions of all the displaced and evicted
inhabitants who face a constant threat of forced evictions. persons, the ‘People’s Commission in Eviction and
Evictions by the local and state authorities have been Displacement’ concluded, “The system is not only colonial;
conducted with most ad-hoc and inhuman manner in the the judicial system is downright pathetic. To say that it is designed
65. Beliaghata Eviction on Human Rights Day, Strategies to Combat Forced Evictions, Kolkata Workshop Report, Combat Law
Publications, 2004
66. Memorandum on Bellilious Park, Strategies to Combat Forced Evictions, Combat Law, 2004
67. India: New Eviction case in the name of road expansion, West Bengal (http://foodjustice.net/ha/mainfile.pha/ha/mainfile.pha/
ha2005/37/)
70. http://www.censusindia.net
57
rights organisations in the city is to reinstate the HUDA in Displacement from Mussi Riverbanks
its proper role as a planning organisation, which can facilitate The river development project in Hyderabad under the
a solution to the housing crisis in the city. name of Save Mussi Campaign is being used by the AP
government to displace 12,000 households from the banks
August 2000 floods of the 18 km long Mussi River, which divides the city.
Hyderabad is notorious for the worst violations of the
building norms. The HUDA and MCH had supported this On August 9, 2005, two hundred families living under
illegal practice resulting in the August 2000 floods. During Shivaji Bridge were forcefully evicted. Though 60 families
had received a stay order from the court. This is an ADB
this man-made disaster, there were 21 deaths, more than
project with a budget of Rs 900 crore. The work has
7500 houses washed away, 3000 houses partially damaged already begun and will be completed in 30 months. There
and more than 80,000 people rendered homeless. Eighty- are around 27 such settlements residing on the 11 km
eight localities of sixteen mandals in Hyderabad and stretch from the Tipu Khan Bridge to the Chaderghat
Rangareddy districts were affected. The CHATRI and other Bridge since which have been there since the 1950s.
associated civil rights organisations had forewarned the
During the 1970s and 1980s government had provided
administration of the dangers of this kind of haphazard
houses in different schemes. Many of them have patta
infrastructure development well in advance. This was nothing
and even registration title deeds. Many of the working
but planned inundation to displace the urban poor out of
poor inhabitants have built four pacca houses with their
the city. The August 2000 floods were a monumental man- own hard earned savings. The government has also spent
made disaster that aggravated the housing shortage for the crores of rupees in providing water, electricity, drainage,
poor in city71 . On the other hand, the state authorities blamed roads, community halls and other facilities.
the slum dwellers saying that they were the root cause of the
flood situation in the city. In reality, the twin cities had hundreds On the Mussi riverbank, there are farmers in 40 villages
of lakes, but now only 170 are left. Most of them are at cultivating on 50,000 acres of land who would also be
various stages of encroachment through public constructions. affected by the project. Similarly, in 1997 under the name
When the civil society organisations surveyed the localities of Nandanavanam Project, the administration had
threatened to dislocate thousands of poor families residing
they discovered that due to haphazard infrastructure
along the riverbanks.
development, all water outlets had been blocked. The
recent eviction saw a planned inundation by the local Evictions in 2003
administration creating flood situations so that the 1) Lakadi ka Pul: On January 9, 2003 450 families were
inhabitants of the slums could be evicted. evicted from Lakadi ka Pul near Nirankar Nagar. The
City’s homeless
In Hyderabad, there are a large number of homeless persons living on the streets. Usha Rani from
SANNIHITA, is working among street dwellers and sex workers in the city. Usha said that most of them
are beggars, but there are also a large numbers of workers sleeping on the road dividers. Along the
roadside many people sleep in jam-packed pavements. These homeless persons are often mobile. The
possessions of the street dwellers are one sack in which their bedding and small hand baggage is kept
and a water bottle. Thieves often attack them in the night. Due to this reason street dwellers prefer to
sleep under streetlights. During the night to find a safe area they run from one place to another. Only after
1 am at night do they manage to settle at one place to take a nap for a few hours. Sometimes due to
police harassment the whole night is spent in running around from one place to another within the city.
Usha narrated an incident of March 24, 2000, when former US President Bill Clinton had visited Hyderabad
city for the first time. The local city administration forcefully packed hundreds of street dwellers out of the
city promising to provide them permanent houses. They were loaded in large trucks and dumped a
hundred kilometres away from the city. It took several days for them to walk back into the city. There are
around a hundred thousand people living on the streets in Hyderabad.
V
isakhapatnam (also known as Vizag) is a fast years, didn’t allow the fisher folk community to construct
developing port city and the second largest city pucca houses on the pretext that it would violate the CRZ
in the state of Andhra Pradesh. The city has notification. The government, as it is the beach area, also
several State owned heavy industries. It has the only natural issued the CRZ notification, which is prone to cyclones.
harbour on the eastern coast of India. The population The proposed road from Visakhapatnam to
of Visakhapatnam metropolitan region is 1.06 million Bheemunipatnam, known as “Swarnandhra Sagaa
and decadal growth is 40.95 percent, according to Theeram” road is taken up within the 200-metre range,
Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority (VUDA) on no development zone. The VUDA has already
(2001). The Visakhapatnam metro region covers 1721 completed more than 2 km road violating the CRZ
sq km, which includes five urban centres namely notification without any permission from the ministry.
The road passes through the survey number 121, 122,
123, 146, 147 and 150 of Chinadadili village. In the village,
Andhra Pradesh Coastal Zonal Management Authority
demarcates the CRZ-I areas. Further, the revenue map
of Endada village clearly shows that there are sand dunes
in the survey numbers 145, 114 and 113 and 106. And
now R&B department is making efforts to construct road
in another 3 km stretch violating the CRA notification.
The existing road alignment from Visakhapatnam to
Bheemunipatnam would affect, nearly 17 fisherfolk villages.
These communities are going to loose their shore area for
boats, landing, fish drying, net keeping and in turn loose
their livelihood. The fisherfolk community had approached
the High Court, which sanctioned stay on the construction
Visakhapatnam, Vizianagaram, Ankapalli, of fourlane road. But recently the road and building
Bheemunipatnam and Gajuwaka and also a large rural (R&B) department started the construction work.
area with 287 villages 73 . Vizag to Bheemunipatnam area is 27.2 km stretch road
MVP Colony
Costal Regulatory Zone violations
Chinagadila
Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority (VUDA)
Endada Village
is constructing the four-lane 200-metre roadwork, which
Jodugullapalem
is a direct violation of Coastal Regulation Zone of 1991.
Gudlavanipalem
The AP Government had approved Coastal Zone
Rushikonda
Management Plan and VUDA Master Plan in 1989. As
Kapulauppada
per the CZR notification of 1991, no permanent
Thimmapuram
construction should be allowed in the CZR area.
Mangamaripeta
The state High Court has also directed the government Chepalaukppada
agencies not to allow any type of construction in the area Nerallavalasa
earmarked by the Master Plan. The government, since many Bheemunipatnam
73. http://vuda.nic.in/masterplan.htm
61
After exposed to recent disastrous tsunami, all the
concerned government and non-government people have
been expressing that the CRZ notification should be
implemented strictly. The Fishermen’s Youth Welfare
Association has appealed to strictly implement the CRZ
notification without any deviation.
Illegal constructions
D Ramanaidu studio construction is on at Madhuravada
village. Filmmaker Ramanaidu was allotted 40 acres in
survey number 336 in 2003 by the then Telugu Desam
government at the rate of Rs 40,000 per acre. The entire
survey - 336 extending to 80 acre, in which the site was
allotted to Ramanaidu, falls under CRZ-I. Jalari Petha,
fishermen colony near coast of the sea where there are
3000 fishermen living.
Mr. M Venkateswarulu and Laxmi are housing rights
Vizag to Bheemunipatnam area map
activists who regularly seek legal interventions in courts
and mobilise community to demand for their rights.
Venkateswarula has formed the Slum Dwellers Welfare 5) Rajeev Nagar, Chakali Gadha Dayanad Nagar,
Union, working in more than twenty-five slum Kancharatapalam
settlements in Visakhapatnam city. 6) Karasa Basti area near Naval Armed Department
In Visakhapatnam, Slum Dwellers Welfare Union has 7) Gowri Nagar area (NAD)
made many legal interventions and obtained stay orders 8) Ekalavaya Colony near Roads and Buildings office
from the court preventing forced evictions. But the 9) Chitti Babu Colony
administration had ignored the court orders in many cases 10) Shrama Shakti Nagar
and executed arbitrary evictions. 11) Shiv Shankar Colony (Dhobi Colony)
150 families of dhobi community were evicted in June
Evictions in Visakhapatnam city 2005
1) Sabastian colony area Nanapuram on Oct 12, 2002 12) Vasudeva Nagar
90 houses were demolished 12) Venkateshwar Nagar between Akya Palam and
2) Bharat Nagar behind the Nanal Science and Technical Tatichakla Palam of NH-5 road (Chennai-Kolkatta
Ltd (NSTL) 40 families of SC and OBC communities highway)
were residing since 35 years. These inhabitants were 13) Indira Nagar Colony
eviction on January 18, 2003. Around 24 persons were 14) Endada Colony
arrested on Feb. 24, 2003 Rehabilitation site
3) Vinayak Nagar is a 30-year old colony located at Hill Similar to other major cities, Visakhapatnam is on the
Area near Ram Nagar. 150 families of SC/ST and OBC same lines constructing the EWS housing units at
and minorities were staying there Madhurwada, which is 20 kilometres away, at Sudd-
4) Sidharth Nagar, 350 families staying since 1980s. Land Ibbalu area. This is a remote area of forestland where
was acquired under the Urban Land ceiling Act, a false 50,000 houses have been planned to dump the working
housing society was made to evict Sidharth nagar inhabitants urban poor at this so-called rehabilitation centre.
Protest demonstration by Slum Dwellers Welfare Union against forced evictions at Sabastian colony area
Since 1950s, urban growth largely took place in the eastern part of the city and, particularly, the
western urban peripheries. The occupation of marginal areas is the only available housing option for
economically weaker urban groups.
Eastern Ahmedabad has about 44 percent of the total housing units in the Ahmedabad Municipal
Corporation (AMC) region, with 54.8 percent of the total dwelling units in the category of chawls and
slums. It accounts for 75 percent of the chawl units and 47 percent of the slum units in the city.
The percentage of Ahmedabad housing categorised as slums increased from 17.2 percent in 1961 to
22.8 percent in 1971 and 25.6 percent in 1991. It is estimated that 17.1 percent of Ahmedabad’s
population lived in slums in 1971. This rose to an estimated 21.4 percent in 1982. The last estimate,
based on a population census for the year 1991, indicates that 40 percent of households lived in
slums and chawls.75
74. http://www.censusindia.net
75. UN-Habitat (2003), The Challenge of Slums, Earthscan, London; Part IV; 'Summary of City Case Studies', pp 195-228
63
In Ahmedabad city, the first Integrated Urban programme, Sabarmati Riverfront Development Project,
Development Project (IUDP) was initiated after the flood has already started. The aim of the project is to grab the
of 1973. This project affected nearly 300 families living urban space presently being used by the poor inhabitants
on the banks of the Sabarmati. The plan was to develop for commercial use. Some forty thousand families are
a low cost housing colony on a plot of 43 acres. The likely to be displaced, of whom 80 percent are Muslims
project failed because the relocation area was situated far and the rest are members of other backward classes
away from the core area of the city. In 1984 a new slum (OBCs) and scheduled castes (dalits).
upgradation programme was initated under the urban This project was conceived way back in the 1960s by
development programme of the World Bank. However, Bernard Cohen and during the 1970s and 1980s the
the programme failed due to the weak financial position Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation had attempted to
of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation. As a result, revive it but, it was dropped due to a series of protests
the programme was abandoned in 1992. In 1990, the from civil society organisations. Now, Mr Bimal Patel of
department of International Development, DFID, UK the Environmental Planning Collaborative (EPC) has once
started a project to cover nearly 400000 people living in again taken keen interest in reviving the riverfront project
183 slum locations. for commercial purposes.
In 2004, the Gujarat government had apprised a top-level In previous instances, the EPC had notoriously designed
World Bank team led by its country director Michael Carter similar projects (like Nandanvan Project) on Hyderabad’s
about the state’s desire for a comprehensive slum upgradation Mussi river, where over 2000 poor households were
plan for the city. The World Bank team visited several slum relocated at a far-off place. The issue of resettlement is
areas of Ahmedabad, the state and WB are working out a still plagued with controversies against the interests of
policy to transfer the land titles to private owners and remove the local inhabitants.
the slum dwellers from their original place.
The Sabarmati River Front Development Corporation
Sabarmati Riverfront Development Project Ltd (SRFDCL) was registered on May 28, 1997. The
The slum dwellers in Ahmedabad are facing huge main objective of the SRFDCL is to undertake business
evictions. At the banks of Sabarmati, the beautification promotions for building commercial complexes, markets,
Forced evictions in Ahmedabad
No. Year Name of slum Area No. of families Relocation
1 2003 Salatnagar Gomatipur 240 No settl
2 2003 Lakodi Talab Old Lakh 200 No settl
3 2003 Bhojabhai Juhapura 100 No settl
bhatto
4 2004 Gulby Takera Navrangpura 600 Odhav
5 2004 Devji Pura Sahibag 380
6 2005 Lakodi Talab 200
7 2005 Mahakali Danilimada 100 No settl
8 2005 Mangaltalavdi Vashna 250 No settl
9 2005 Chandranagar Vashna 80 No settl
10 2005 Tarwadichalli Chamanpura 70 No settl
11 2005 Civil Hosp. Chapara Meghaninagar 265 No settl
12 2005 Bakaramundi Ranip 150 No settl
13 2005 Doordarshan Driving Road 150 Thaltej village
Chapara Thaltej
14 2005 Kadi-Kalol Mehsana 265 No settl
15 2005 Himmatnagar Himmatnagar 150 No settl
16 2005 Vyra Surat 400 No settl
(Source: ActionAid India) Table – 9
76. The Times of India, New Delhi, February 25, 2004, Rajiv Jagubhai Shah, "Religious Places are Public Premises"
77. Eviction/demolition — Struggle for housing right by Ms. Beena Jadhav, ActionAid India Gujarat RO Ahmedabad, Gujarat
These people were being evicted from their homes It was urged by the petitioner, and on behalf of the slum
without prior notice and without provision of any dwellers, that the said slum dwellers were residing on the
alternative accommodation. The court has granted stay plots bearing survey number 146/1, 146/2, 147 and 148
in this case and the government has been told to provide for more than 30 years. The said land was wasteland. Earlier,
alternate accommodation. the slum dwellers were working in the stores of the PWD
as labourers and they were even provided with electricity
Special civil applications were filed for the stay of the connections and water facility. Never in the past the
eviction of the hutment dwellers living at Dani Limda authorities had raised any objection against the existence
area of Ahmedabad city, southern zone for over past 25 of the hutments nor they were ever given any notice at any
years, at Indiranagar, Mahendra Road, Kalol for over point of time in the past for eviction.
past 25 years, at plot number 305 opposite Ambica Mill
under Khokhra over-bridge in Gomtipur area for the It was further urged that in a democratic country the
past 30 years and southern side of Dhulia Highway near poor and landless citizens have also right of having
Mindhola river on the land bearing city survey number dwelling and they cannot be evicted and chased away
2582 of Vyara town of Surat district for over past 20 like animals. Such an action would be violation of Article
years. All of these people were being evicted without 21 of the Constitution of India. As observed by the
prior notice and also without alternate accommodation. Supreme Court, the right to life enshrined under Article
21 includes meaningful right to life and not merely animal
In each of these cases, the court granted stay order and
existence. Right to life would include right to live with
the forced eviction, therefore, averted.
human dignity and it is a basic human right.
HC stays evictions After hearing Advocate SH Iyer, appearing for the
In response to a PIL filed by the Jan Sangharsh Manch, petitioner Manch, the division bench while issuing notice
the division bench of the Gujarat High Court, comprising to the respondents, sought to know from the government
Chief Justice Bhawani Singh and Mr Justice HK Rathod as to whether alternative residence could be provided to
issued notice to the secretary, road and building the said slum dwellers. Mr Iyer has filed a number of
department, government of Gujarat and the executive PILs and litigation on housing rights issues and has
engineer, road and building department, Ahmedabad and received favourable orders from the courts in the past.
stayed the eviction of around 112 slums situated in New
HRLN,Ahmedabad; Jan Sangarsh Manch, Ahmedabad;
Mental Colony, Meghaninagar, the PWD Campus at ActionAid India Ahmedabad; and Sabarmati Nagrik
Asarwa, Ahmedabad till further orders. Adhikar Manch contributed in finalising the Ahmedabad report
•
review papers
. ,
Myths and realities
The real answer to the question of why so many people from 1995 onwards, not a single unit for the EWS housing
live in slums is systematically analysed in this chapter has been constructed in Mumbai (The MHADA:
through the extracts of various official documents that Activities and Achievements 2002).
provide a vivid picture of the housing scenario.
The Lok Awas Yojana, a component of the National
As against the annual need of 46,000 housing units in 1960s Slum Development Programme, was not implemented
and 60,000 in 1970s in Greater Mumbai, the supply of formal in Mumbai due to unfeasibility (per unit Rs 30,000). The
housing by public and private sector together has been only new avatar of this scheme: the Valmiki Ambedkar Awas
17,600 and 20,000 units. During 1984-91, the supply increased Yojana was commenced on a small scale in few pockets
to 47,400 units per annum, whereas the current need is of of Mumbai from 2002 onwards.
85,000 units - a deficit of 45,000 unitspersists.
(pp 245 - 246 the MMRDA Regional Plan 1996 -2011) Housing supply by the public agencies has been far below
the requirement and that by the private sector has always
The cost of 40-sqm unit is minimally Rs 140,000. The been beyond the reach of the poor. The housing
data on incomes indicate that such formal supply is conditions deteriorated as 73 percent of the households
affordable to only top 6.25 percent (monthly income more in 1991 compared to 69 percent in 1981 lived in one-
that Rs 6,451 at 1991 prices) of households in Mumbai room tenements (Government of Maharashtra, 1995).
(pp. 248 the MMRDA Regional Plan 1996 - 2011). Rental markets were locked and as such the only option
for many low-income families was to .encroach on public
The private housing market leaves out the poor; the public
and private open lands and build structures, which they
sector supply is limited. As a: result, the shelter needs of
53 percent of the poorer or 45,000 households are could afford (The BMRDA, 1994, pp 259).
satisfied in the informal market every year. This supply is Myth of lack of land and money
in the form of further densification of existing slums
When it comes to housing for the poor 6ne of the most
and growth of new slums (pp. 248, the MMRDA
famous reasons given for not providing rehabilitation,
Regional Plan 1996 - 2011).
security of tenure is that of land shortage, insufficient
From inception (1997.) to 1995, the MHADA has funds and a constant stream of migration. Under the
constructed 33,890 units for economically weaker sections present demolition drive in response to the demand for
and another 19,184 units under the slum clearance scheme rehabilitation for those whose homes have been
,
69
demolished, the chief minister has been quoted in several public housing reduced to about 5 percent and in some
newspapers as saying: 'We don't have the land and the cases to almost nil. On the other hand, the mill owner's
money and that daily over 300 families enter Mumbai share is increased by more than triple.
city." Coincidently, however, while the struggle fof The Municipal Commissioner Johnny Joseph justified his
housing is continuing on one hand on the other hand, at demolition ot tn. slums by announcing that the space
the same time, the Democratic Front has been caught in vacated was needed for gardens and parks. At the same
the Mill lands controversy and in a controversy regarding time, he (MCGB) surrendered more than 80 hectares of
improper allotment of the CIDCO land. -the mill lands reserved for the open spaces to the private
The Mill lands controversy" use of the mill owners.
In Central Mumbai, the Mill lands covers an extensive area
An enquiry into the functioning of Shivshahi
of about 250 hectares. The 150 year old textile industry was
Punarvasan Prakalp Limited'"
the economic backbone of the city that emplyed two-thirds
of the labour force of the city in the early twentieth century. Mr SS Tinaikar alongwith Mr RB Budhiraja, principal
The flourishing industry, however, had been rendered sick secretary to the government (housing department), was
mainly due to the sustained and illegal diversion of the funds appointed by a government resolution housing and special
by the owners into newer' and more profitable industries
assistance department No SPP - 1021/131/ desk 2 dated
rather than using the profits for modernisation of the mills.
April 4, 2001 to enquire into the working of the Shivshahi
In the last 15 years, the real estate prospects of these vast
Punarvasan Prakalp Ltd (SSPL). The SSPL was set up as
tracks of land lured the mill owners to exploit the land
potential than running the mills. As a result, the state a government company with Rs 300 crore equity from
government was also pressurised to change the development the MHADA and Rs 300 crore equity from the MMRDA
control rules in 1991 allowing the sale of land on the under the Shiv Sena - BJP combine to assist in financing
condition,rthat the mills were modemised. The floor space slum rehabilitation schemes thereby provide free housing
index, which could not exceed 0.5 on the industrial land on, for 200,000 slum dwellers by December 1999.
was increased to 1.33 and the 'change of use' was allowed
from industrialto commercial. The closure of the mills and The Tinaikar Committee was appointed to investigate into
the redevelopment of the land were allowed through the whether the standards adopted for granting loans to private
DCR 58 (i), on the condition that 33 percent land was given developers were proper and whether the building
to· the MCGB for open spaces and civic amenities and 33 construction works undertaken by the SPPL fulfil a public
percent was given to the MHADA for public housing. The purpose. In his 200-page report, Tinaikar is extremely
mill owner enjoyed the full FSI on his share of land and as critical of the functioning of the SPPL. Critising the manner
the TDR (transfer of development rights).
in which the SPPL was set up and the constitution of the
In 2001, however, this DCR 58 was changed in such a board of the SPPL and the process of granting loans, Mr
way that the land share for the public open spaces and Tinaikar's investigation revealed that the SSPL had received
78. The Mill lands controversy' section contributed by Neera Adarkar, writer, social activist and architect closely associated with
the Mill lands and Mill Workers Struggle
79. They're to Blame for Rs 41.5 Crore Loss, Indian Express, Mumbai Newsline, Page 2, January 6, 2005
80. Report of the committee apointed by government for enquiry into affairs of the SPPL, Volume 1, August 1, 2001
30 crores were allotted to the MHADA. This sum was Mumbai makeover and the World Bank
utilised to cover the loss incurred in a supposedly self- The conflict on housing rights for the poor has not only
ftnancing scheme of constructing transit tenements for the remained in the domain of the Maharasthra government
MMRDA. This is a gross irregularity as has been pointed but is also influenced by the World Bank and other
out in the CAG Report 2000 and the Tinaikar Report. international agencies. In a meeting organised by the Mumbai
First and MMRDA on the Mumbai Makeover held in the
In the Indian Express of April 22, 2005 another mention
Taj Hotel, Mumbai on May 25-26, 2005, the country head
was made of funds meant for housing for the poor being
of the World Bank was among the keynote speakers. In his
left unutilised. In its Sixth Demands on Grant 86-page
report the parliamentary standing committee pulls up the presentation, he stated that the only way to provide for
ministry of urban development for lack of initiative and housing for the poor was to leave it to the market. More so,
planning. The report reveals that one of the main reasons the city must repeal the Urban Land Ceiling Act, lift the cap
for non-utilisation of funds has been caused by the failure on the FSI and open up the salt-pans for housing.
of the Mumbai slum relocation scheme to take-off.
At the same conference, other international speakers
The powerful real estate lobby also plays a critical role in shared experiences about similar urban renewal
ensuring that vacant lands are not freed up for utlisation endeavours in London. In their presentations they clearly
of slum dwellers. The National Commission on stated that in order to provide housing for the poor they
urbanisation in 1987 reported that 91 individuals in
had to keep special zones and government had to be
Mumbai owned 55 percent of the vacant lands.
closely involved as market forces leave out the poor.
Clearly what can be inferred is that while the lands and
Union Finance Minister P Chidambaram, however, in
funds are available there is no political or bureaucratic
his speech at the conference, largely reiterated what the
will to utilise these available lands for housing slum
dwellers. On the other hand, even land meant for housing World Bank representative said. Newspaper reports
the poor or land reserved for other purposes have been following the conference spoke about the need to repeal
used by vested interests for their own profit. the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.
T
his draft proposal has been prepared on behalf . therefore, relocated. A comprehensive rehabilitation policy,
of the Nivara HJkk Suraksha Samiti. The points thus, has to be formulated for this purpose.
mentioned in the report were discussed in detail
There will be need for vacant land for these rehabilitation
and have been approved as a joint charter of demand
projects. The ULCRA must be strengthened and
by the various housing rights organisations in Mumbai.
implemented for this purpose and its loopholes plugged.
Legalisation of slums land The vacant NDZ land must be considered as sites for
Land occupied under slums must be legalised and rehabilitation along with infrastructure development. We
reserved in the'developrnent plan (DP) as sites for housing consider the NDZ land as contingent land, made available
of the urban poor. Necessary amendments in the DP for development as required, but with the development
must be carried out for this purpose. Surveys of slums of infrastructure for it. The rehabilitation cost must be
be conducted and their boundaries demarcated. The included in the budget of the primary project for which
present DP is irrelevant to the needs and demands of the slum sites have to be cleared.
our city's majority people, particularly the poor and the
Infrastructure development thrust
working class. There is no exclusive reservation of land
Upgradation and expansion of infrastructure must be
for housing of the urban poor. A miniscule reservation
considered a priority in the redevelopment programme
for housing of the dehoused (HD) is inadequate. for our slums. It is not possible that around 2,300 slums in
Moreover, the housing requirement of people being the city can be rehabilitated or reconstructed within a short
displaced from old dilapidated buildings or because of period. It is, therefore, important to carry out infrastructure
infrastructure projects, ete., is also not met under the work that includes adequate water supply, sewage disposal,
present reservation. The reservation of land for project sanitation, solid waste management, accesses, ete. What is
affected persons (PAP) as provided in the development needed is the upgradation of the environmental condition
plan is also inadequate given the number of slum dwellers in the slums and not merely pursue a real estate agenda for
who are being displaced due to various projects. mega construction and turnover.
Slums occupy a mere eight percent land in the city and Redevelopment alternatives
that too illegally. Nearly five million people living in the A. The SRD amendments: Necessary amendments to
slums occupy about 2500 hectares. It is not possible to the present Slum Redevelopment Policy regulated by the
relocate or rehabilitate five million slum dwellers on SRA should be carried out to plug the various loopholes
alternate sites. Therefore, it is necessary that their present and make it more slum dweller friendly.
sites be recognised as sites reserved for housing of the B. The SUP: The slum dwellers be given the option to
urban poor in the DP, thus legalising them. upgrade or improve their slums if they so desire,
Rehabilitation policy particularly, where people are opposed to the SRD
We agree that not all slums can be regularised in their present schemes led by the builders.
sites. Many slums exist in the dangerous locations and many C. Reconstruction plan: Reconstruction of slums can
others are situated in areas that are harmful to the health be carried out by the slum dwellers co-operatives in
of the local inhabitants. Besides this, certain sites have to partnership with the government (and not with the
be cleared in order to carry out important infrastructure builder). The government's contribution will be in the
work. Slums on such locations and sites have to be, form of .infrastructure development while the slum
* PK Das is based in Mumbai. He is an architect and activist associated with the Nivara Hakk Suraksha Samiti, an umbrella
organisation formed in early 1980s when footpath dwellers were displaced in Mumbai city
General conditions
1. Surveys concerning slums must be jointly carried out with the participation of slums' communities, NGOs, etc.
2. Information and data must be made available to the public and widely published.
3. Sanctions and activities under the SRA must be monitored by the public (a representative body of the NGOs,
eminent citizens, etc.) and be in full knowledge of the affected slum dwellers.
4. Information regarding infrastructure projects and other schemes in larger public interest leading to the
displacement of slums must be widely published and discussed before being forced for implementation.
umbai is a classic case of the excesses of beautiful city,sanitised and clean, cleansed of its poor, meant
Global Facts"
• In 1~OO,merely two percent of the world's population was urbanised
• During 1950, thirty percent of the world population was urban
• In the year 2000,47 percent of the world population was urban
• More than half of the world's population will be living in urban areas by 2008
• It is expected that by 2030, 60 percent of the world population will live in urban areas
• Almost 180,000 people are added to the urban population each day
• It is estimated that there are almost a billion poor people in the world, of this over 750 million live
in urban areas without adequate shelter and basic services
• World population touched 6.1 billion in 2001, and is growing at an annual rate of 1.2 percent, or
77 million
• Every fourth households lives in poverty in cities of the developing world
• Thirty seven percent of the population in cities of the developing world is employed within the
informal sector
• The annual need for housing in urban areas of developing countries alone is estimated at around
35 million units (200-2010). In other words, some 95,000 new urban housing units have to be
constructed each day in developing countries to improve housing conditions to acceptable levels
Harsh Dobhal is managing editor of Combat Law journal on human rights and law
81. Habitat Backgrounder. United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat)
82. Combat Law. Sept - Oct 2004. Nowhere to Live: Urban Housing in India. Vol. 3, Issue 3 pp 1-46
was terror in the air, the police vacated the lands and builders Mumbai First, a powerful lobby of builders, industrialists
recruited private security personnel to intimidate. The iron . and ex-bureaucrats, initiated the 'city development plan'
fencing in Ambujwadi, Indiranagar, Rafiq Nagar and for Mumbai with the multinational, McKinsey. The
Wadala had uprooted thousands of inhabitants. The dalits Mahrashtra government adopted the plan, without
at Ambedkar Nagar and Bhimnagar Vikroli-Kannmavar consensus, not even in the l,egislative assembly. The
Nagar, were too badly hit.
McKinsey report had no much concrete solution for the
The Maharashtra habitat needs of the working
government's justifications poor inhabitants. Instead it
for demoli tio n were as suggested that slums should
hollow as its pre-election be slashed to 10 percent.
promises. The official line The Maharashtra Housing
contends that slums eat up Development Authority
space and infrastructure. But stopped constructing low-
the government has been cost houses after 1990.
proved wrong on both Mumbai First and other
these counts. The groups propounded the
infrastructure excuse has idea of "developing
been questioned by the YUVA, a Mumbai-based Mumbai into a world class metro" and complained that
organisation that came up with a study establishing that there was no land for real estate.
slum dwellers actually used very little infrastructure as
only 5.26 percent slum-dwellers had access to individual McKinsey and Mumbai First have reasons to smile. The
water taps and 62 percent of them used public or shared state government has been remarkably docile and
toilets. obedient, police prompt and ruthless. Slum dwellers have
been warned in no uncertain terms that they should forget
The displaced slum dwellers are posing serious questions
Mumbai, government has no plans to house them. Their
asking, if the government lacks infrastructure, how can it
children have been thrown out of the schools, their school
afford to give quick permission to build about 100 forty-
storeyed buildings all over the city. Obviously, while the bags and pencils and their dreams, have been crushed
government cares only for the rich and upper middle class with their slums and hutments, more could be underway.
sections, the poor inhabitants find no place in its agenda. Mumbai has become the hunting ground for the national
and transnational corporations. The World Bank has been
The civil society groups again contest 'lack of space'
extremely generous to come forward with one billion
justification vociferously. Mumbai was once known for its
dollar to push the 're-modelling' plan, to develop the city
thriving textile mills that have all been closed in last decade
into a global financial centre. Of course, there will be a
and half. These lands were leased out to the mill owners by
the government over 50 years ago but they have not returned time to pay back, with "heavy interest".
the land after shutting down the mills. About 2,000 acres of For now, damn the poor, Amehi Mumbai is going global!
lands are lying waste in defunct mills and docks. But the
government has no plans to provide houses to the poor in This article IVaIfirst pllblished in the Combat J ~IIV jOlin/a/,
these lands. In fact, in the absence of a comprehensive plan, Vol4 issue 1, April·May 2005, pp 32
ne of the worst manifestations of urban poverty alleviation had been utilised with full sincerity, we would
* Indu Prakash Singh is working with ActionAid International - India (AAI-I). He has been director of Ashray Adhikar Abhiyan (AAA), a
programme of AAI-I working to ensure the shelter rights of the homeless in Delhi
79
percent of all private land in the world. 50 percent of 21 provides that no person be deprived of his life and
the slum population possesses less than five percent of personal liberty. The Supreme Court affirms that the right
the whole land. The majority of the urban poor live in to life necessarily implies access to basic amenities. To that
less than one-tenth of city space, and we all know that 90 end, the right to adequate shelter is a constitutional guarantee.
percent of the shortage in housing is experienced by the Because the practice of forced eviction results in the loss
economically weaker sections of our society. And still, of livelihood, it is prima facie transgression of Article 21.85
we are not tire in saying that there's no land. Land for
whom? The issue is that there is enough land for the rich Article 14 and 15 guarantee of substantive equality,
to buy and stock it as farmhouses, but not for the urban obliging the state to take affirmative action in facilitating
poor, the homeless and the inadequately housed, who opportunities for the disadvantages and prohibiting
run the cities ofIndia through their hard labour, construct discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste,
the buildings at a risk to their own health and life, and sex or place of birth. Read together, these provisions
work in our homes as domestic labour, languish in the not only prohibit the exclusion of those marginalised
dungeons of the city. Ironically, they are seen as a drain from basic housing needs and land rights, but also
on urban economy; we forget that our cities would implicate State action in redressing these deprivations.86
collapse if they were not there. We need to treat the urban I
poor as citizens of our country, and not as 'pickpockets A rights-based approach to development in
and thieves', as noted by our judiciary. the housing sector can:
• Empower the poor and the homeless
The urban spaces should also spawn lots of livelihood
options, add need to embrace the rural settings. The • Promote security of tenure, particularly for
corporate sector has an important role to play in this. women and vulnerable groups in inadequate
And the livelihood options need to be aligned with the housing conditions
housing locations. A divorce between the two is what • Strengthen protection against forced evictions and
has created the' mess that we are in today. discrimination in the housing sector and
83. Kothari, 2003. The Human Rights to Adequate Housing - India's commitment and the Struggle Towards Realisation. New Delhi:
Joumal of the NHRC, Vol. 2 : 136. The term 'adequate housing' includes: legal security; availability of services, materials, facilities
and infrastructure, affordability, habitability; accessibility; location; and cultural adequacy
84. Idem
85. Ibid pp 134-5
86. ibid P 135
87. Habitat International Coalition - Housing and Land Rights Network, South Asian Regional Programme (HIC-HLRN), 2004. Acts of
Commission, Acts of Omission: Housing and Land Rights and the Indian State, New Delhi, p6
satisfactory due to paucity oj funds and ineffective Year States (no of schemes) Total
management. The mqjor urban concern is the growing gap 2003-04 Chhattisgarh (1) 1
between the demand and supplY of basic infrastructure services 2002-03 MP (1)
like safe drinking water, sanitation and sewerage, housing, West Bengal (1) 2
energy, transport, communication, health and education." 2001-02 Andhra Pradsh (3)
Chhattisgarh (2)
The report further states: "Poverry reduction has been uneven
Karnataka (1)
between the states. The most important point about the inter- ".
MP (2) 8
state variation in poverry is that it sbous no correlation with
2000-01 Maharashtra (7)
per capita income or other development indicators levels qf
MP (1)
Industrial and irifrastructural development, etc., in urban areas
Orissa (1)
during the Nineties. It mqy be seen that the dynamics of
Rajasthan (1) 10
development in the urban areas of the states during the past
1999-2000 Chhattisgarh (2)
two decades have been such that rapid economicgrowth has not
Maharash tra (21)
led to a corresponding decline in poverry. Urban poverry, thus,
MP (3)
emerges as a more complex phenomenon than rural poverry. "
Table - 13
Studies have shown that casualisation of the labour is the While MP went for seven, Chhattisgarh for five, Andhra
main and increasing source of urban poverty ... "It is necessary Pradesh for three, the remaining ones: West Bengal,
that the policy-related causes of urban poverty such as Karnataka, Orissa and Rajasthan had one each.
95. ibidp 24
96. Jagori, 2004, op cit, P 42
97. Hazard Centre, 2003. A People's Housing Policy: The case study of Delhi, New Delhi: 32-33
98. National Campaign for Housing Rights, 1992. The Housing Rights Bill, Madras, p i
1. The most vulnerable of the vulnerable (women and 5. Engaging with the judiciary. Work towards building a
children and men with multi-layered personal. climate against beggary Acts. Disseminate the findings
challenge/ hardship). The level of vulnerability will of the various studies done on it in the country through
deepen with every personal challenge/ hardship they workshops, inviting all the stakeholders. And then, finally
face, like: destitution, disability, mental illness, physically knocking the doors of the legislature, for repealing such
ill/ medical emergency, starving, HIV positive, sexual Acts. The PIL course should be used sparingly. Only,
abuse, chemical dependence, police brutality, ete.
only, only as a final measure and that too, after being
2. Homeless people leading the intervention: cadres as approved by all the leading human rights activists/
community health workers, counselors, mobilisers/ advocates. Changing the mindset is very crucial.
--- ---------
99. Aashray Adhikar Abhiyan, 2003. Reflections of AAA Team members: ... Towards Reclaiming Our Humanness, New Delhi
12.Developing an understanding on the Reforms Agenda 15. Cross-regional (office) support is required, may be a zonal
of the government and being posted on current approach to campaign under the national campaign will
decisions, policies, conference, ete. It will be a nice idea be all the more better. It can be in terms of linking our
to establish something like Urban Areas Development rural NFs to areas (the hinterlands) from where people
Watch Group whose job will be to monitor the are migrating and having interventions in those areas as
happenings and immediately transmit the information well. In fact, we need to have a holistic approach in
100. United Progressive Alliance, 20041 Common Minimum Programme of the United Progressive Alliance, New Delhi: 12
We need to take account of these people as well The domestic policy climate is against the poor,
• Homeless people: women, children, elderly, desti- international ones are no better (exp. WB/ USAID/
tute, chemical dependents, mentally ill, disabled WTO, etc.).
• Sex workers
• HIV + people
• People living in slums
• Nomads
• Homeless unemployed youth
", Dr K Shanmugavelayutham is with the department of social work at Loyola College, Chennai
Note: The Chennai Slum Dwellers Rights Movement is an umbrella organisation of NGOs working in slum areas in Chennai. The CSDRM
educates the urban poor about the government strategy through street meetings and keeps a vigil on the process. The Co-ordinators of
the movement are Centre for Urban Poverty Alleviation, Pennurimai Iyakkam, Legal Education and Aid Society, TN-FORCES and Nirman
Mazdoor Panchayat Sangam
4. During the parliamentary and assembly elections, f) Filing of the PILs in situations involving
prepare a list of demands and ask the political parties significantly increased levels of. homelessness. Most
to include them in their respective manifestoes. of the time, only legal strategy is not successful.
People's Charter for Housing Rights was prepared This strategy can be used in selective cases. One
and circulated before and after the 14th Lok Sabha of the reasons for the failure is insufficient
elections in the year 2004. documentation and insensitiveness of the courts
5. Civil society groups should meet political leaders to 14. Creating awareness about government schemes is
request them to ask questions in the assembly sessions an important s.tep. Due to bureaucratic negligence
during the budget session on housing demand and and corruption many of the government schemes
on increased allocation on housing. do not reach the poor. In order to create awareness,
government orders must be printed in the form of
6. News regarding any forced eviction or issues related
pamphlets and should be propagated so that
to housing problem must be informed to the media thousands can benefit from the goyernment schemes.
immediately :;0 that media inevitably report their point
of view. 15. Focusing on the women's groups is the right strategy
for promoting adequate housing rights. From the
7. Mobilise support from trade unions, planners,
women's point of view, housing is not only a basic
architects, lawyers and students to join the struggle
shelter need, it is also a place of employment, social
and help in formulating alternative solutions.
interaction and care for children and most of all a
8. Establish larger people-based network to demand place of safety and so a Fundamental Right in the
adequate housing for the urban poor. The GOs, case of women.
)NNURM critique
,., ,
,. ",., ,I
;;I .' ~
I
93
Time-bound commitment by the state governments (v) Enactment of a public disclosure law
and ULBs for carrying out reforms in order to access (vi) Enactment of a community participation law, so
funds under the mission as to institutionalise citizens’ participation in the local
Funding pattern would be 35:15:50 (between the decision making; and
Centre, states/ ULBs and financial institutions) for cities (vii) Association of elected municipalities with the city
with over four million population, 50:20:30 for cities planning function
with populations between one and four million, and
80:10:10 for other cities Mandatory reforms: Municipal level
(i) Adoption of a modern, accrual-based, double entry
Assistance under the mission, to be given in the form
system of accounting
of soft loan or grant-cum-loan or grant, would act as
seed money to leverage additional funds from financial (ii) Introduction of a system of e-governance using
institutions/capital markets the IT applications, GIS and MIS for various urban
services
The mission comprises of two sub missions, (i) Sub-
Mission for Urban Infrastructure and Governance, and (iii) Reform of property tax so as to raise collection
(ii) Sub-Mission on Basic Services to the Urban Poor. The efficiency to 85 percent
admissible components under both these sub-missions (iv) Levy of user charges to recover full cost of
include urban renewal, water supply and sanitation, operation and maintenance within seven years
sewerage and solid waste management, urban transport, (v) Internal earmarking of budgets for basic services
slum improvement and rehabilitation, houses for urban to the urban poor; and
poor, civic amenities in slums and so on.
(vi) Provision of basic services to the urban poor,
The mission document clearly states that (a) funds accessed including security of tenure at affordable prices
cannot be used to create wage employment, (b) land costs
will not be financed, (c) housing to the poor cannot be Apart from these, there is a set of optional reforms
given free of cost, (d) privatisation or public private common to both the state governments and ULBs, any
partnership will be the preferred mode of implementing two of which they are supposed to implement each
projects, (e) a ‘reasonable’ user fee will be charged from year. These include:
the urban poor for services so as to recover at least 25 (i) Revision of byelaws to streamline the approval
percent of the project cost, and (f) the onus of minimising
process for construction of buildings,
risks for the private investor would be on the state
development sites, etc.
governments/ ULBs.
(ii) Simplification of legal and procedural frameworks
Thus the mission is a completely market driven urban for conversion of agricultural land for non-
development process where major section of urban land agricultural purposes
will be in control of powerful business interest groups (iii) Introduction of property title certification
(PBIGs). The programmes have been divided into two
(iv) Earmarking of at least 20-25 percent developed
parts, mandatory reforms and optional reforms. land in housing projects for economically weaker
Mandatory reforms: State level sections and low income groups with a system of
The state governments seeking assistance under the JNNURM cross-subsidisation
would be obliged to carry out the following reforms: (v) Introduction of computerised registration of land
(i) Effective implementation of decentralisation and property
initiatives as envisaged in the Constitution (seventy- (vi) Administrative reforms including reduction in
fourth) Amendment Act, 1992 establishment cost by introducing retirement
(ii) Repeal of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 schemes and surrender of posts falling vacant due
(iii) Reform of rent control laws to retirement
(iv) Rationalisation of stamp duty to bring it down to (vii) Structural reforms
no more than five percent within seven years (viii) Encouraging public private partnership
O
n December 3, 2005, Prime Minister Manmohan accentuated nexus among the rich, builders, contractors,
Singh announced the controversial National MNCs, multilateral agencies, and the government. She
Urban Renewal Mission Programme named stressed that this would change the overall social, cultural
after Jawaharlal Nehru. On the occasion, he showered and economic character of the cities to the disadvantage
of the large section of marginalised
pro-poor statements like
and exploited population103. Former
providing to the urban poor basic Prime Minister VP Singh called it
services and tenurial rights. But anti-poor and the Communist Party
during the year, slum demolition of India (Marxist) criticised the
activities became the most sought mission for paving way for
after or favoured solutions by the privatisation of urban services.
policymakers in the name of
The national media and the business
urban renewal programme. The
circles also created hype over the
singular motive has been to grab
urban poor settlements in the scheme but for ordinary citizens the
name of development and news had no excitement. The media,
beautification.101 unfortunately, created a general
impression that the mission had
“Urban Renewal” is a concept of been welcomed by all sections of
American origin in the post- society since it promised to bring
World War–II era, initially much-needed investment in the
referred to slum clearance and urban infrastructure. But time and
housing but has gradually evolved experience will show that merely
into a multi-dimensional concept. throwing away money at a problem
Unfortunately, it is increasingly is not a feasible solution.
being considered as the only
answer to the multi-faceted urban Due to easy access to funds, many
crisis102. states are blindly accepting the
proposal in major cities (such as the
Ms Medha Patkar, national metro rail project in Bangalore and
coordinator of the National
urban development projects
Alliance of Peoples Movements
(NAPM), criticised the urban elsewhere in Karnataka, Kerala and
renewal scheme much before it was officially launched. Uttaranchal), which the union government has included
She said that it was a well-planned conspiracy to privatise under the JNNURM. These states have “automatically”
basic amenities and that the programme would lead to accepted conditionalities without bothering even to discuss
more commercialisation and privatisation and an them in the state legislatures or among the general public.
* Sushil George is working with the Human Rights Law Network, India. He is involved with the housing rights Initiative programme
to establish network and solidarity with the grassroots community-based organisations that are resisting the forced evictions and
advocating for right to housing in Indian cities
101. Urban Planning & Politics of Slum Demolition in Metropolitan Mumbai, Sanchayeeta Adhikari
(www.asres.org/2004Conference/paper/Adhikari.doc)
102. Mission for Application of Technology to Urban Renewal and Engineering (MATURE), International workshop on urban renewal
February 17-19, 2004 at New Delhi
103. National consultation on urban development planning and space for the poor, held in Mumbai on October 15-16, 2005
95
Imposed conditionality acclaims and recognition as global best practices. The Slum
The entire national programme seeks to impose coercive Networking Project bagged International Habitat Award
conditionalities of a uniform policy and discourages in 1994 and Agha Khan Award for architecture in 1997,
diversity of development in small and major Indian cities. though none of the 174 upgraded settlements are in any
Under the JNNURM, an entirely new process is being way a model in the country.
set in motion that will supplant or supersede the current,
often legislatively enacted, processes. Urban land ceiling
The major move is to discard the Urban Land (Ceiling &
The mission guidelines contain strict conditionalities for Regulation) Act, which is bound to create many negative
urban governance, which will result in the adoption of ramifications such as the hoarding of urban land by the
anti-poor policies and non-participatory approaches speculators and large developers (private partners). The
especially keeping at distance with civil society primary intention of the Urban Land (Ceiling &
organisations and social movements in the country. Regulation) Act, 1976 was to impose a ceiling on vacant
urban holdings in order to prevent the concentration of
The first major mandatory amendment is to draw public-
wealth into a few and to facilitate acquisition of land to
private partnership (PPP) models for development,
serve ‘the common good’. But implementation of the
management and financing of urban infrastructure. This
Act was counter-productive. Over 14,000 hectares were
means that the affluent business sections will be the major
vested with the state governments, but physical possession
stakeholders over the renewal programme in the sixty-
of only 3852 ha was achieved and a mere 621 ha was
three cities.
actually developed for housing. The
The PPP 104
The primary intention of the modest contribution to equity was
Though past experience shows that the Act was to impose a ceiling on more than offset by long-drawn
public-private partnerships were utter vacant urban holdings in order litigations and administrative delays,
failures in providing adequate housing to prevent the concentration of which effectively withdrew over
and basic services to the urban poor. wealth into a few and to 100,000 hectares from the market,
The in-situ experimentation and cross facilitate acquisition of land to enabling those exempt from the law
subsidy or land-sharing schemes have serve ‘the common good’ to charge exorbitant prices and
benefited the private partners but the further intensifying land price
poor have been squeezed into lesser inflation. 105 Resulting into land
urban space, which has created a deterioration in the living monopoly and syndication by the powerful few. This
standards of millions of urban poor communities. would automatically further lead to large-scale
displacement of the urban poor and increase socio-
One of the major failures in major cities is of large-scale economic inequality between the rich and poor, thereby
in-situ upgradation without tenure and consideration of reducing accessibility of land for the middle class as well.
extremely high density of population in the targeted area. To repeal the Act is, therefore, pro-rich, pro-business and
For example, Indore city’s Slum Networking Project was anti-common man act. In fact, many powerful business
considered to be a dream project for making Indore a corporates are waiting for the ULCRA to be repealed in
slum-free city. The DFID had invested (US $14 million) many states so that they can buy-off large chunks of lands
on in-situ upgradations, but immediately after its on the peripheral areas of the big cities with the obvious
completion, the next endeavour was to scrap the intention of profiteering and speculation.
infrastructure and settlements through riverfront
development project. These upgradations, however failed The major reason why low-income groups have no access
in their mission to create a conducive and sustainable to housing is because large portions of city space are
environment in the slums of Indore city. Despite their kept vacant by speculators and developers resulting in
failures at the ground level, they received international artificial and unreasonable inflation of prices. It is often
104. Poverty and Vulnerability in Indore, report contains a detailed analysis on the poverty and vulnerability in Indore including the
mapping of all urban poor settlements
105. Geoffrey Payne, Urban land tenure and property rights in developing countries a review - Section III. National policy issue - p-12,
Intermediate Technology publications, London, 1997
106. Remarks by George Deikun, Mission Director, USAID India at the National Media Conclave “ Globalising Indian cities:
Partnership for change
107. Down To Earth, Missionary zeal, urban renewal critical analysis by S V Suresh Babu, January 2006
108. India’s pro-investor plan for urban renewal by Jake Skeers, March 25, 2006 World Socialist Web
109. India Together, For the people, by Diktat, Sept 5, 2005, Vinay Bindur, programme coordinator for the CIVIC Bangalore
110. Urban Renewal Mission: Whose Agenda? (Raju) People’s Democracy (Weekly organ of Communist Party of India (Marxist) Vol
XXIX No 49, December 4, 2005
T
he Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal working people, along with all the hazardous occupations
Mission (JNNURM) is basically an incentive and substances of the cities, in the meagre patches of land
scheme for providing assistance to the state on the fringes or back lanes of the formal city and that
governments and urban local bodies (ULBs) in selected too by charging user fee! And in the name of involving
63 cities. With rupees one lakh crore at stake for a period private sector in solving the housing problem of slum
of seven years, the mission is the single largest initiative dwellers, it sets the stage for selling lucrative public lands
of the central government in the urban sector. to corporate real estate interests, land mafia and contractors.
Even a cursory glance at the national urban renewal While these reforms have been offered on the benign platter
mission makes it clear that it is designed to exclusively of ‘decentralisation’ and ‘community participation’, it is
benefit local and international investors and will surely clear from the way the mission has been designed that the
make life worse for the majority of urban residents in so-called community participation is going to be restricted
the country. The repeal of the Urban Land Ceiling & to the involvement of the bodies of the middle class
Regulation Act (ULCRA) gives a free hand to the builder ‘citizens’, which are already functioning as the ‘demand
lobby to acquire vast tracts of land in the cities thus driving side’ of economic reforms in the decision-making process.
the poor out of their places. Similarly, property title
Further, the reform-linked assistance programme of the
certification and computerisation of land and property
mission undermines the principle of federalism in India.
strike at the very root in which the poor stake their claim
The 74th Constitutional Amendment did not envisage
on the city ie de-facto occupation of land for residential
uniformity at the level of policy formulation and
and occupational purposes through a variety of informal
implementation as the mission is asking for. What kind
networks created through the workings of electoral
of a decentralisation is this when the states and ULBs
democracy in India. Already the government has
have no choice but to carry out economic reforms?
permitted hundred percent FDI in the real estate sector
and introduced freehold property rights. The central government in this scheme of things is thus
playing the same coercive role vis-a-vis the state
These combined with the reforms proposed under the
governments and ULBs that the Bretton Woods
JNNURM will strengthen privatisation and institutions play vis-a-vis the central government.
corporatisation of land and civic amenities. Though the Moreover, by introducing such far-reaching changes in
mission does make some politically correct noises about the way our cities are going to be governed, without any
giving property rights and services to the urban poor, debate in Parliament or state legislatures, the government
they have to be seen in the context of dwindling livelihood has completely subverted the notions of the primacy of
opportunities in the cities about which the mission says electoral democracy and accountability.
nothing and the grossly iniquitous distribution of land in
urban areas which the mission is going to sharpen. All this is, of course, consistent with the efforts of the
ruling class to delink economic policies from democratic
In this context, the pious intentions expressed in the mission politics, thus making the role of the only weapon the
seem more like an attempt to ghettoise the poor and poor have in the given system ie their vote, redundant. It
* Lalit Batra has been associated with the Hazard Centre, New Delhi. He is also actively involved with Sanjha Manch, a network of
organisations and trade union federations and community-based organisations in the national capital. The Manch deals with the
pro-poor concerns relating to livelihood, basic amenities and housing
99
is no wonder that the mission has been widely greeted hand from global finance capital and on the other an
with applause by the corporate media, the real estate lobby, increasingly vocal and assertive middle class. Both these
foreign investors, national and international finance forces have attacked the affirmative activities of the
capitals, international bodies like the WB, ADB, and middle welfare State as the root cause of corruption, lawlessness
class citizens’ groups like the Bangalore Action Task Force and pollution of city life. The argument goes like this: It
(BATF), Janaagraha, Mumbai First and so on, so forth. is the politicians who have over the years actively
The politics of globalisation encouraged the growth of illegal industries and
Needless to reiterate, the ‘reform’ agenda of the encroachment on public lands by slum clusters in order
JNNURM is in line with the policies of liberalisation, to create captive vote banks and a ready source of
privatisation and globalisation initiated in early Nineties. income. This has resulted in the law-abiding, tax paying
The politics of globalisation depends, among other things, citizens being denied their legitimate rights in the city.
on refashioning and ‘reforming’ cities in order to make
them investment-friendly. Major cities of the Third World Thus the idea of the reclamation of the rights of the
are thus sought to be de-linked from real domestic ‘citizens’ has been directly linked to further dispossession
priorities and positioned as nodes in the global circulation of the already dispossessed. This has serious implications
of finance and services. Bangalore thus is positioned as for the rights of the working people for a better life as
the ‘Silicon Valley of India’, Mumbai as ‘Shanghai’ and the consolidation of the middle classes around the vision
Delhi as ‘Singapore’. This puts a heavy strain on the urban of a ‘Clean and Green City’ creates a social force
land and other resources which are increasingly freed from necessary for further delegitimisation of the existence of
‘less productive uses’ such as small-scale manufacturing working class in the city.
or housing for the poor and deployed for high tech
It becomes important, in this context, to see the
modes of accumulation and consumption, whether
connections between changes in urban configurations,
material or symbolic, of the affluent. The entire urban
spatial or occupational, and changes in modes of
space, in this process, becomes a market place where
accumulation reflected in newer forms of commodity
distribution and consumption of global brands take place
production, circulation and consumption. Praxis of this
in the form of a series of spectacles.
nature will go a long way in identifying both the sites of
Pressures have brought about the change in the resistance as well as the actors of resistance to the
governmental and administrative priorities on the one hegemonic neo-liberal project of international finance.
O
ne of the major reasons for deteriorating habitat weaker sections in the city. Poor are thus pushed to live in
conditions in India is the non-implementation and blighted pockets, which are highly dense.
flouting of the Master Plan rules. A city's Master
The Constitution of India has given specific directions
Plan is a regulatory statement that provides a guiding law
to all the states for the fulfilment of minimum basic rights
for physical development of the city. The
of its citizens including habitat, health
plan provides sufficient space for human and primary education. It is obligatory
settlements to all inhabitants within the city, for all the Indian states to pay specific
foreseeing the future growth and attention towards the poor and ensure
integrating the physical, social, economic their access to sustainable human
and political frameworks. Thus the plan development programmes. It is on
is the arch regulatory guideline for these directives that the Centre, state
improving the quality of human and urban local bodies (ULBs) have
settlement and its working environment. framed laws, policies and regulations.
For last three decades, the Master Plans The evolution of the Town Planning
of all major cities had made sufficient Act in India started to improve the
regulatory provisions for residential living conditions of the urban poor.
land, keeping in view the present Rajeev at India habitat campaign 04 The Improvement Trust was set up
inadequacies and future population in 1898 after an outbreak of the
growth till the stipulated planning period. However, the bubonic plague occurred in Mumbai. The main objective
population projection has not been higher than what has of the Act was to redevelop slum blighted areas,
been projected during the plan period. Even there were especially those, which were inhabited by economically
sufficient lands made available to all inhabitants, but these weaker sections of the community. Later, Improvement
lands were systematically been locked-up or diverted for Trusts followed in other major cities like: Mysore (1905),
commercial and individual monetary gains by the Kolkata (1911), Nagpur (1936), Bangalore (1945) and
powerful business interest groups. Delhi (1957).
Subsequently, the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 and
Paradoxically, slumming in urban cities is not the result
the Madras Town Planning Act, 1920 marked the beginning
of socio-economic conditions, but primarily due to
of comprehensive town planning legislation. These two
inequitable access to land and misuse of residential zones,
Acts enabled local authorities “to undertake town planning
which was legally earmarked in the major cities’ Master
schemes for areas in course of development”.
Plans, thus the working class communities are deprived
and denied legal tenurial rights. These urban development authority acts of India have
to be viewed in the overall context of town and country
In fact, it is the nexus of politicians, bureaucrats and planning legislation in India. They can be classified into
private builders that has been directly involved in illegally three categories of jurisdiction – national, state and local.
encroaching prime lands, which was once reserved for The Town Planning Act comes under the state acts. The
* One of the leading housing rights campaigners, Rajeev John George, had contributed significantly in the struggle
against housing and forced eviction violations. This is an excerpt of his views on right to housing campaign
101
Urban Land Ceiling & Regulation Act is a central Act, In India, the bureaucrats are mainly responsible for
while building byelaws and zoning regulation come under implementing the Master Plan of a city. Unfortunately,
the local legal instruments. they have blocked the flow of large number of tenable
lands in the city, which should be allotted to working
The Town Planning Act
class at an affordable price. Eventually, due to bureaucratic
The Town Planning Act governs the preparation and
implementation of the Master Plan in a city. This is a hurdles the land and housing shortage has led to the
blueprint for developing the entire city. It stipulates that proliferation of the slums in mega cities.
detailed planning will be done to Therefore, radical reforms are
optimise land use with provisions needed through innovative ideas
City slums are not the result of
for housing, specifically for the for integrating housing for poor
socio-economic conditions, but
weaker sections, transportation, inhabitants. Access to housing for
public/semi-public purposes, primarily due to inequitable poor is only possible when
education, health, parks, play access to land supply and housing is brought into overall
grounds and other public utilities. misuse of residential zones development plans and
implementation strategies.
The Town Plans (TPs) are the most
important documents that directly affect the life of the Following steps must be taken
people in the city. Once this document is legally approved, Mapping of urban poor locations using satellite image
all development activities in the cities: construction, Marking of residential units that come on the proposed
displacement, etc., are governed by the TP. Hence, it is roads
important that the impact of the TP on poor of the city Alternative land should be provided in residential land
be taken into consideration, before and during its use within the livelihood catchments
formulation. A timely pro-poor intervention will ensure The plans should be area-based ward can be the unit
a comfortable space for the present and future needs of of planning
the poor in the city. Identifying proposed road
Identifying areas for improvement
Provisions for filing objections and suggestions
Identifying areas for clearance and rehabilitation
Master Plan formulation passes through four major stages.
In Master Plan, rehabilitation sites for the resettlement
The citizens are invited to file their objections and
of slums and jhuggies should be clearly earmarked
suggestions regarding the Master Plan.
Need for communicable and verifiable information
The existing land use preparation stage base
The Master Plan formulation stage Exercise should be ward-wise
The zonal plan formulation stage With wider participation including the ward
th e co u rt ju dgm e n ts
A poor homeless person was sleeping in the premises of a court. The marshal came and
scolded him. He was asked to go away. The man who was woken up from his slumber said:
"I am prepared to leave this place, but tell me at which place I should sleep". The marshall
had no answer to the query of the homeless person. And, no one in the government or in
public bodies or those forming the affluent sections of society have any answer to the
question of the hapless homeless person. This is a tragic phenomenon of poor, unemployed
and homeless persons all over the world.
Right to shelter: Diversified view of judiciary 2. In Chameli Singh vs State of UP [(1996) 2 SCC 549]
In the various cases, the Supreme Court has enlarged the a Bench of three judges of Supreme Court had considered
meaning of life under Article 21 of the Constitution to and held that the right to shelter is a fundamental right
include within its ambit, the right to shelter. In some of available to every citizen and it was read into Article 21 of
the cases upholding the right to shelter, the court looked the Constitution of India as encompassing within its ambit,
at differentiating between a mere animal-like existence the right to shelter to make the right to life more meaningful.
and a decent human existence, thereby bringing out the In para 8 it has been held thus: (SCC pp. 555-56):
need for a respectable life.
“In any organised society, right to live as a human being
1. Upholding the importance of the right to a decent is not ensured by meeting only the animal need of man.
environment and a reasonable accommodation, in It is secured only when he is assured of all facilities to
Shantistar Builders vs Narayan Khimalal Totame develop himself and is freed from restrictions, which
(1990) 1 SCC 520: AIR 1990 SC 630 the Court held that:
inhibit his growth. All human rights are designed to
“The right to life would take within its sweep the right to achieve this object. Right to live guaranteed in any civilised
food, the right to clothing, the right to decent environment society implies the right to food, water, decent environment,
and a reasonable accommodation to live in. The difference education, medical care and shelter. These are basic
between the need of an animal and a human being for human rights known to any civilised society. All civil,
shelter has to be kept in view. For the animal, it is the political, social and cultural rights enshrined in the
bare protection of the body, for a human being it has to Universal Declaration of Human Rights and
be a suitable accommodation, which would allow him to Convention or under the Constitution of India cannot
grow in every aspect – physical, mental and intellectual. be exercised without these basic human rights.”
The Constitution aims at ensuring fuller development
Emphasising further on the right to shelter, the court in
of every child. That would be possible only if the child
this case held that:
is in a proper home. It is not necessary that every citizen
must be ensured of living in a well-built comfortable “Shelter for a human being, therefore, is not a mere
house but a reasonable home particularly for people in protection of his life and limb. It is however where he
India can even be mud-built thatched house or a mud- has opportunities to grow physically, mentally,
built fireproof accommodation.” intellectually and spiritually. Right to shelter, therefore,
* SH Iyer is a senior lawyer at the Ahmedabad High Court. He deals with the housing, criminal and labour cases and works with the Jan
Sangharsh Manch and Human Rights Law Network
107
includes adequate living space, safe and decent structure, and in opportunities and status. It positively charges the
clean and decent surroundings, sufficient light, pure air state to distribute its largess to the weaker sections of the
and water, electricity, sanitation and other civic amenities society envisaged in Article 46 to make socio-economic justice
like roads, etc., so as to have easy access to his daily a reality, meaningful and fruitful so as to make life worth
avocation. The right to shelter, therefore, does not mean
a mere right to a roof over one’s head but right to all the living with dignity of person and equality of status and to
infrastructure necessary to enable them to live and develop constantly improve excellence.
as a human being. Right to shelter when used as an “ Though no persons has a right to encroach and erect
essential requisite to the right to live should be deemed to
have been guaranteed as a fundamental right. structures or otherwise on footpaths, pavements or public
streets or any other place reserved or earmarked for a
“As is enjoined in the Directive Principles, the State public purpose, the State has the Constitutional duty
should be deemed to be under an obligation to secure it to provide adequate facilities and opportunities by
for its citizens, of course subject to its economic distributing its wealth and resources for settlement of
budgeting. In a democratic society as a member of the life and erection of shelter over their heads to make the
organised civic community one should have permanent right to life meaningful, effective and fruitful. Right to
shelter so as to physically, mentally and intellectually livelihood is meaningful because no one can live without
equip oneself to improve his excellence as a useful citizen means of his living that is the means of livelihood.
as enjoined in the Fundamental Duties and to be a The deprivation of the right to life in that context would
useful citizen and equal participant in democracy. The not only denude life of effective content and
ultimate object of making a man equipped with a right meaningfulness but it would make like miserable and
to dignity of person and equality of status is to enable impossible to live….”
him to develop himself into a cultural being. Want of
decent residence, therefore, frustrate the very object of “...Article 19 (1) (e) accords right to residence and
the constitutional animation of right to equity, economic settlement in any part of India as a Fundamental
justice, fundamental right to residence, dignity of person Right. Right to life has been assured as a basic human
and right to live itself.” right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Article 25 (1) of the Universal Declaration of
3. In PC Gupta vs State of Gujarat and Ors, in 1994, Human Rights declares that everyone has the right to a
the Court went further holding that the Right to shelter in standard of living adequate for the health and well-
Article 19(1) (g) read with Articles 19(1) (e) and 21, included being of himself and his family; it includes food,
the right to residence and settlement. Protection of life
clothing, housing, medical care and necessary social
guaranteed by Article 21 encompasses within its ambit the
right to shelter to enjoy the meaningful right to life. The
services. Article 11 (1) of the International Covenant
right to residence and settlement was seen as a fundamental on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights lays down
right under Article 19(1) (e) and as a facet of inseparable that State Parties to the Covenant recognise that
meaningful right to life as available under Article 21. everyone has the right to standard of living for himself
and his family including food, clothing, housing and to
4. In the case of Ahmedabad Municipal Nagarpalika
the continuous improvement of living conditions.”
vs Nawab Khan Ghulab Khan, reported in (1997) 11
SCC 121, the Hon’ble Apex Court has observed as under: 5. In the case of Olga Tellis and Ors vs Bombay
Municipal Corporation reported in (1985) 3 Supreme
“ The right to life enshrined under Article 21 includes Court Cases 545 the Apex Court has concluded as under:
meaningful right to life and not merely animal existence.
Right to life would include right to live with human dignity. “...To summarise, we hold that no person has the right
Right to life has been assured as a basic human right to encroach, by erecting a structure or otherwise, on
under Article 21. Due to want of facilities and footpaths, pavements or any other place reserved or
opportunities, the right to residence and settlement is an earmarked for a public purpose like, for example, a
illusion to the rural and urban poor. Articles 38, 39 and garden or a playground; that the provision contained
46 mandate the State, as its economic policy, to provide in Section 314 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation
socio-economic justice to minimise inequalities in income Act is not unreasonable in the circumstances of the
“No one has a right to make use of a public property "From the incident, which took place yesterday at
for the private pur pose without the requisite Vadodara while carrying out demolition drive, all the
authorisation from the competent authority. It would, authorities have to learn lessons. There should be full
therefore, be but the duty of the competent authority to coordination between all the authorities including police
remove encroachments on the pavement or footpath of before carrying out such demolition drive. They must
the public street obstructing free flow of traffic or passing see to it that while carrying out such demolition drive
or re-passing by the pedestrians." public peace is not disturbed by some handful anti-
social elements, who are against the development and
Thus, it is clear that no one has a right to make use of
public property for private purposes. progress of the state of Gujarat. If required, they
may be even booked before carrying out such demolition
Latest view of the Supreme Court drive, as they are simply land grabbers".
Sending a shock wave to the slum dwellers, the bench of
the Supreme Court comprising Justices Ruma Pal and The slum Policy of the State
Markanday Katju made it loud and clear that encroachers The urban development and urban housing department
have no right whatsoever on public land, nor even for a of the government of Gujarat has framed a draft of
minute. Allowing demolition of slum clusters of Nagli Gujarat state urban slum policy and this policy is under
consideration of the government. The policy
Machi near Pragati Maidan in New Delhi, the bench turned
contemplates as under:
down the poverty plea. “Desperation does not mean
they can do something illegal by encroaching public land,” * ‘In-situ’ upgradation will be preferred to relocation. All
said the bench. (As reported in the Times of India, efforts will be made by the ULBs to upgrade the slums at
Ahmedabad edition dated 10-5-2006) the same sites
Religious structures – Encroachment * Layout Planning: Where in-situ upgradation projects
Following the recent incident of demolition of Dargah are taken up, proper layout planning including plot re-
by the civic authorities in Vadodara city, the division bench
alignment and equalisation of land may be undertaken
of the Gujarat High Court, based on the report published
as necessary in consultation with local residents
in “The Times of India”, initiated suo-motu writ petition
and made following observations in its order: * All relocation processes will be carried out in
consultation with the affected slum dwellers, keeping
“...Encroachment made on the public road by any one
cannot be permitted or tolerated even for a minute as it in mind the distance from workplace and other
causes lot of traffic problems as well as other problems livelihood facilities and after the state government
for the public at large. Only few handful anti-social considers such relocation as unavoidable
elements with the money and muscles power put up * Relocation will be carried out, wherever necessary,
religious structures overnight on public space and then when in-situ upgradation is not possible for a few
T
he Indian cases initially developed the right to life provide facilities and opportunity to build houses.
definition to include a right to housing by Acquisition of the land to provide house sites to the poor
identifying component socio-economic rights. The houseless is a public purpose as it is the constitutional
rights are found in the Directive Principles of the duty of the State to provide house sites to the poor.
Constitution.
(Section 8 para e) All civil, political, social and cultural
Chameli Singh vs State of UP rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and Convention or under the Constitution of India
(Before K Ramaswamy, Faizan Uddin and
cannot be exercised without these basic human rights. Shelter
BN Kirpal, JJ)
for a human being, therefore, is not a mere protection of
a. Chameli Singh and Others ... Appellants
his life and limb. It is home where he has opportunities to
Versus
grow physically, mentally, intellectually and spiritually. Right
State of UP and Another …. Respondents
to shelter, therefore, includes adequate living space, safe
Civil Appeals No 12122 of 1995 with No 12123 of and decent structure, clean and decent surroundings,
1995 Decided on December 15, 1995 sufficient light, pure air and water, electricity, sanitation and
other civic amenities like roads etc., so as to have easy
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by access to his daily avocation. The right to shelter, therefore,
K Ramaswamy, J — Leave granted does not mean a mere right to a roof over one’s head but
right to all the infrastructure necessary to
CA No 12122 of 1995@SLP © No. 4896
enable them to live and develop as a
of 1993
human being.
(Section 4 para c) Article 25(1) of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights declares that (Section 8 para c) To bring the dalits and
“everyone has the right to a standard of tribes into the mainstream of national life,
living adequate for the health and well-being providing these facilities and
of himself and his family including food, opportunities to them is the duty of the
clothing, housing, medical care and necessary State as fundamental to their basic human
social services”. Article 11(1) of the and constitutional rights.
International Covenant of Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights, 1966 laid down that (Section 15 para e) Housing conditions
State Parties to the Covenant recognise “the of dalits all over the country continue to
right to everyone to an adequate standard be miserable even till date and is a fact
of living for himself and for his family of which courts are bound to take judicial
including food, clothing, housing and to the notice.
continuous improvement of living (Section 17 para b) Providing house site
conditions”. The State parties will take to the dalits, tribes and the poor itself is a
appropriate steps to ensure national problem and a
realisation of this right. constitutional obligation. So
Right to Life = Right to Housing long as the problem is not
(Section 7 para d) To make Right to Housing and Shelter
solved and the need is not
Right to Alternative Accommodation
the right meaningful to the fulfilled, the urgency
Right to Earn Livelihood
poor, the State has to continues to subsist.
* From the Judgment and Order dated December 12, 1988 of the Bombay High Court in WP No 4837 of 1987
h o u sin g le gislatio n s
T
he Constitution of India has given specific The process of land acquisition accelerated after the
directions to all the states for the fulfilment of formulation and implementation of the First Five-Year
the minimum basic rights of its citizens including Plan in 1951. Large tracts of land were acquired for
habitat, health and primary education. Making it obligatory irrigation, hydro-electricity dams, iron, steel and other
for all the Indian projects in the public
states to pay specific sector. All this was
attention towards the done in the name of
poor and ensure their national development.
The involuntarily
preference for a
displaced persons
sustainable human
were given meagre
development compensation and left
programmes. It is on to find out ways for
these directives the their rehabilitation.
Centre, state and Most of these project-
urban local bodies affected people are
(ULBs) have framed laws policies and regulations. now living in slums of urban cities.
This section deals with laws, policies, Acts and regulations The Housing and Urban Land (Ceiling &
focusing on habitat needs. There are also anti-poor laws, Regulation) Act, 1976
which have its negative ramifications, though the After Independence, land reform laws were enacted in
constitution has provided specific directions to all the various states in India. With increasing influx of urban
states for the fulfilment of minimum basic rights including population, the importance of urban land became prime.
habitat, health and primary education. Thus, it is obligatory Rise in urban land prices and lack of affordability by the
for all the Indian states to pay specific attention towards majority became quite common. Few people held large
the poor and ensure their preference for a sustainable parcels of urban land, invariably kept vacant for
human development programmes. speculation. It was in this context that the government
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 of India felt urgent need to impose social control on
land and bring about legislation. Thus was enacted the
The Land Acquisition Act was introduced in 1894. This
Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act of 1976.
is an Act for the acquisition of the land for public purpose
and for companies. The Act with several amendments The purpose of this Act was to make land available for
made later is still the law in force. The most important housing to the poor. Section 20 of the Act also had
deficiency of this Act is that it was enacted during the provisions for the owners of excess land to construct
colonial regime that firmly believed in the doctrine of houses for the poor and sell them at affordable rates.
eminent domain defined as the power of the government The owners could also use the land to construct hospitals,
to take private property for public use regardless of the schools, etc., for the welfare of the public in general.
owners' views on this matter. This doctrine was followed
even after Independence.
The Repeal of the Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1998
It was the former minister of urban development, Ram
There were a number of protests against the acquisition Jethmalani, who spearheaded a vicious drive to repeal
of lands under this Act before and after Independence. the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976. A
121
false impression was created that the repeal would release and objections against the repeal to the SC Rastogi
large tracts of land for the housing sector. But this was a committee of Parliament, ministry of urban affairs,
mischievous ploy backed by the PBiGs and landlords. employment and urban development that was in-charge
As a result, the sale of land in the open market resulted in of the ULCRA, 1976, at Room No. 433, Parliament
denying housing access to the city’s poor inhabitants. House in New Delhi.
In June 1998, the ULCRA was completely scrapped. The Slum Areas (Clearance and Improvement) Act
ostensible reason given was that the Act had led to The Slum Areas (Clearance and Improvement) Act of
distortions in the land market. More specifically various 1956 was enacted to provide for the improvement and
reports have suggested that the main “distortion” was clearance of the slum areas in certain union territories
the freezing of large parcels of land in legal disputes. and for the protection of tenants in such areas from
eviction. This Act was further enacted by the states in
To tackle this problem, there was a need to plug all those India in the 1970s.
loopholes in the laws, which were being used by landlords
to stall its implementation. The provisions of the Act cover the following areas:
1) Power to declare areas as slums
In fact, the 1996-97 report of the ministry of urban affairs 2) Improvement of the slum areas
and employment stated that a committee had been 3) Restriction on building in slum areas and power to
constituted to “expedite the process of finalisations of demolish
proposals for amending the Act”. But before the 4) Clearance and redevelopment
committee could make any decisions, the government 5) Acquisition of land for improvement/
repealed the Act as part of its wholesale marketisation redevelopment
crusade. The ULCRA thus stands repealed in the union 6) Protection of tenants in the slum areas from eviction
territories as well as in most of the states in India.
Prima facie, the provisions of this Act appeared to be in
Consequently, large sections of the urban poor and middle favour of the urban poor. However, in practice, the Act has
classes are being deprived of access to urban property. failed in achieving the objective for which it had been enacted.
Urban lands for parking black wealth and for speculative
Any area can be declared as a slum area by the competent
gains have now become even more attractive.
authority. Once the declaration is done, the competent
The negative consequences appear quite serious. With the authority has the power to carry out repairs. Authority
repeal, there will be no bar on the amount of urban may restrict any kind of building activity in the area and
vacant land a person can hold. This would obviously may permit the same if the owner seeks permission.
lead to a situation where the rich and powerful will start
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948
purchasing large chunks of land on the periphery of cities.
(i) In respect of housing, the rent corresponding to the
The stated objective of bringing about an equitable
minimum area provided for under government's
distribution of land, a unique asset and wealth creator,
industrial housing scheme should be taken into
has instead led to more speculation.
consideration in fixing the minimum wage.
The result is that the poor groups have now no alternative
(ii) Fuel, lighting and other 'miscellaneous' items of
but to continue living on (untenable) land in blighted areas
expenditure should constitute 20 percent of the total
with the fear of forced and multiple displacements.
minimum wage.
World Bank
Keeping in view the socio-economic aspect of the wage
The World Bank assisted Environmental Management
Plan had recommended repeal of the ULCRA and during structure, the Supreme Court observed that it was
the budget session on June 12, 1998 the Indian necessary to add the following additional component as
government was eager to oblige by passing the repeal a guide for fixing the minimum wage in the industry:
bill. Sixty-four Members of Parliament had objected to "(vi) Children’s education, medical requirement, minimum
the bill and submitted a memorandum to the prime recreation including festivals/ ceremonies and provision for
minister. Ram Jethmalani, who was the then urban old age, marriages, etc., should further constitute 25 percent
development minister, was further snubbed when the of the total minimum wage."
parliamentary standing committee refused him a hearing.
The activists and non-government organisations involved Fair wages: Upward revision, when necessary
in the housing rights issues also submitted their suggestions "Fixation of a wage structure is always a delicate task because
th e in te rn atio n al
in stru m e n ts
T
he right to adequate housing is enshrined in several despite the instructions in Article 51 of the Constitution
international human rights instruments. Indeed, of India, which the Supreme Court of India asserts is a
housing rights are not a new development within requirement for legislative and executive conformity to
the human rights field, but rather have been long-regarded the principles established in international covenants.
as essential to ensuring the well-being and dignity of the (Sources: http://www.unesco.org/human_rights/dcj.htm)
human being.
UN Treaties and Guidelines
Housing rights are integral to the whole of human rights UN treaties and guidelines that can apply to India (re.:
in general and have been included in the most authoritative Right to Housing and its accompanying entitlements w/
international statements regarding human rights including in the Right to Life; These provisions are relevant also if
the Universal Declaration of the right to adequate housing and
Human Rights (1948). alternative arrangements are
denied / unfair eviction occurs and
Housing rights are also enshrined
procedural rights are breached in
and protected within other
the process)
international human rights
instruments, including: 1.Universal Declaration of
Human Rights (UDHR), GA
• The International Convention
Res 217A, UN Doc A/810 (Dec
on the Elimination of All
10, 1948)
Forms of Racial Discrimination
(1965) A. 25(1): Everyone has the right
• The Convention on the to a standard of living adequate for
the health and well-being of
Elimination of All Forms of
himself and his family, including
Discrimination Against Women food, clothing, housing and
(1979) medical care and necessary social services…
• The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989)
B. A 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security
• The Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of person.
(1959), and
C. A 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms
• The International Convention on the Protection of the set forth in this Declaration, w/o distinction of any
Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion,
Families (1990). political or other opinion, national or social origin,
property, birth or other status.
India became a State Party to the International Covenant
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (hereafter D. A 5: No one shall be subjected to torture or to
ICESCR) on July 10, 1979. Although Articles 16 and 17 cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
of the ICESCR require State Parties to submit periodic punishment.
reports on “the measures they have adopted and the
E. A 6: Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere
progress made in achieving the observance of the rights
as a person before the law.
recognised” in the Covenant, India is now three reports
overdue in submitting to the Committee on Economic, F. A 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled w/
Social and Cultural Rights (hereafter the Committee). This o any discrimination to equal protection of the law.
129
All are entitled to equal protection against any and in accordance with the organisation and resources
discrimination in violation of this Declaration and of each State, of the economic, social and cultural
against any incitement to such discrimination. rights indispensable for his dignity and the free
development of his society.
G. A 8: Everyone has the right to an effective remedy
by the competent national tribunals for acts violating [eg as supported by Art 21 case law and applicable
the fundamental rights granted him by the to the Articles and examples below]
constitution or by law. Q. A. 23
H. A 9: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, (1) Everyone has the right to work, free choice of
detention, or exile. employment, to just and favourable conditions of
work and to protection against unemployment.
I. A 10: Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair
[eg if someone is evicted and relocates which requires
and public hearing by an independent and impartial
him/her to lose the current job, or, have higher
tribunal, in the determination of his rights and
transport costs to go to work or find something at
obligations and of any criminal charge against them. a lower pay]
J. A 11 (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has R. A 25
the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living
according to law in a public trial at which he has had adequate for the health and well-being of himself
all the guarantees necessary for this defence. and of his family, including food, clothing, housing
(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on and medical care and necessary social services, and
account of any act or omission, which did not constitute the right to security in the event of unemployment,
a penal offence, under national or international law, at sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack
the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at [e.g. forced eviction]
the time the penal offence was committed.
(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special
[e.g. so no retroactive, ex post facto, nullen crimen care and assistance. All children, whether born in or
sine lege application of the law] out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
K. A 12: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary [eg children as victims of forced eviction have a
interference with his privacy, family, home or special status in their own right; also see the
correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and Convention on the Rights of the Child]
reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection
S. A 26 (1): Everyone has the right to education…
of the law against such interference or attacks.
[eg a schoolchild who is forced to relocate will have
L. A 13 (1): Everyone has the right to freedom of to change schools if possible. See Eviction Watch
movement and residence within the borders of each example p. 37 where the children could not afford
state. to go their original school because relocation meant
M. A 17 (2): No shall be arbitrarily deprived of his that the parents had to take lower paying jobs]
property.
T. A 29 (2): In the exercise of his rights and freedoms,
[eg if someone/a family had paid a deposit everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as
beforehand to secure a space in the slum for the are determined by law solely for the purpose of
purpose of residing there] securing due recognition and respect for the rights
and freedoms of others and of meeting the just
N. A 20(1): Everyone has the right to freedom of
requirements of morality, public order and the
peaceful assembly and association.
general welfare in a democratic society.
O. A 21(2): Everyone has the right of equal access to
public service in his country. U. A 30: Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted
as implying for any State, group or person any right
P. A 22: Everyone, as a member of society, has the to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed
right to social security and is entitled to realisation, at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms
through national effort and international co-operation set forth herein.
12. While the most appropriate means of achieving the 14. Measures designed to satisfy a State Party’s obligations
full realisation of the right to adequate housing will in respect of the right to adequate housing may reflect
inevitably vary significantly from one State Party to whatever mix of public and private sector measures
another, the Covenant clearly requires that each State considered appropriate. While in some States public
Party take whatever steps are necessary for that financing of housing might most usefully be spent
purpose. This will almost invariably require the adoption on direct construction of new housing, in most cases,
of a national housing strategy which, as stated in experience has shown the inability of governments
paragraph 32 of the Global Strategy for Shelter, to fully satisfy housing deficits with publicly built
“defines the objectives for the development of shelter housing. The promotion by State Parties of “enabling
strategies”, combined with a full commitment to
conditions, identifies the resources available to meet
obligations under the right to adequate housing,
these goals and the most cost-effective way of using
should thus be encouraged. In essence, the obligation
them and sets out the responsibilities and time-frame
is to demonstrate that, in aggregate, the measures
for the implementation of the necessary measures”.
being taken are sufficient to realise the right for every
Both for reasons of relevance and effectiveness, as
individual in the shortest possible time in accordance
well as in order to ensure respect for other human
with the maximum of available resources.
rights, such a strategy should reflect extensive
genuine consultation with, and participation by, 15. Many of the measures that will be required will
all of those affected, including the homeless, the involve resource allocations and policy initiatives of
inadequately housed and their representatives. a general kind. Nevertheless, the role of formal
Furthermore, steps should be taken to ensure legislative and administrative measures should not
coordination between ministries and regional and be underestimated in this context. The Global
local authorities in order to reconcile related policies Strategy for Shelter (paras 66-67) has drawn attention
Notes
* Contained in document E/1992/23
1/ Official Records of the General Assembly, Forty-third Session, Supplement No 8, addendum (A/43/8/Add1)
2/ Commission on Human Rights resolutions 1986/36 and 1987/22; reports by Mr Danilo Türk, Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission
(E/CN4/Sub2/1990/19, paras 108-120; E/CN.4/Sub2/1991/17, paras 137-139); see also Sub-Commission resolution 1991/26
3/ See, for example, Article 25 (1) of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, Article 5 (e) (iii) of the International Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, Article 14 (2) of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against
Women, Article 27 (3) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 10 of the Declaration on Social Progress and Development,
section III (8) of the Vancouver Declaration on Human Settlements, 1976 (Report of Habitat: United Nations Conference on Human
Settlements (United Nations publication, Sales No E76IV7 and corrigendum), chap I), Article 8 (1) of the Declaration on the Right to
Development and the ILO Recommendation Concerning Workers’ Housing, 1961 (No. 115)
4/ See footnote 1/
5/ Geneva, World Health Organisation, 1990
111. Cf Case of Ricardo Canese. Judgment of August 31, 2004. Series C No 111, para 115; U.N., Human Rights Committee, General
Comment 27, November 2, 1999
112. Cf Case of Ricardo Canese, supra note 65, para 115; UN, Human Rights Committee, General Comment 27, November 2, 1999,
paras 1, 4, 5 and 19
113. UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement, E/CN 4/1998/53/Add 2 February 11, 1998
114. Cf Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community. Judgment of August 31, 2001. Series C No. 79, para 151
115. Cf Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community, supra note 71, para 149
116. Cf. Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community, supra note 71, para 149
117. Cf Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community, supra note 71, para 149
118. Cf Case of the Serrano-Cruz Sisters, supra note 9 , para 76; Case of 19 Merchants. Judgment of July 5, 2004. Series C No 109,
para 194; and Case of Las Palmeras. Judgment of December 6, 2001. Series C No 90, para 60
119. Cf Case of the Serrano-Cruz Sisters, supra note 9, para 57; Case of Lori Berenson-Mejía, supra note 10, para 133; and Case of
19 Merchants, supra note 75, para 182
120. Cf Case of the Serrano-Cruz Sisters, supra note 9, para 58
Constitution of Greece, Art 21(4): “The acquisition Article 8 – Right to respect for private and
of a home by the homeless or those inadequately family life
sheltered shall constitute an object of special State care.” 1 Everyone has the right to respect for his private
and family life, his home and his correspondence.
The applicants allege that Greek authorities forcefully
evict Roma gypsies from settlements and either don’t 2 There shall be no interference by a public authority
provide alternative housing, or, resettle them in with the exercise of this right except such as is in
substandard living arrangments. accordance with the law and is necessary in a
democratic society in the interests of national security,
Para 57: The State’s housing policies violate Art
public safety or the economic well being of the
16 because
country, for the prevention of disorder or crime,
3. They allowed the forced eviction of Roma from for the protection of health or morals, or for the
sites or dwellings unlawfully occupied by them protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
Republic of South Africa vs Grootboom comply with the court order. The petitioners subsequently
Case No CCT 11/00. 2000 (11) BCLR 1169 and Minister of built themselves temporary structures on a public sports
field and again brought an action against the municipal
Health vs Treatment Action Campaign Case No CCT 8/02
government in court in order to obtain access to the
Background promised adequate housing.
Mrs Irene Grootboom, the petitioner, was part of a The petitioners based their claim on Section 26 of the
group of 390 adults and 510 children living in appalling South African Constitution (which guarantees the right
circumstances in an informal settlement in the Cape of access to adequate housing), and on Section 28 (which
Metropolitan area. Their homes were mandates special protections, including
bulldozed, burnt and their possessions shelter, for children). In its decision for
destroyed. Many of the residents could not the petitioners, the Constitutional Court
even salvage their personal belongings.”121 interpreted the relevant provisions of the
After these people were rendered South African Constitution (including the
homeless from there, they approached the relationship between the right to housing
government but the officials’ answer was in Section 26, the right to social security in
that the homeless should put their names Section 27, the rights of the child in Section
on the waiting list for housing. The waiting 28, and others) and the applicable
list was more than ten years long. international covenants and norms to
which South Africa is a party. It found
In view of this, Mrs Grootboom and that “[t]he State must create the conditions
others asked the court to order the State to provide them for access to adequate housing for people at all economic
with basic shelter, as they had literally nowhere to live. levels of our society.122
The court also found that the eviction was done
prematurely and inhumanely: reminiscent of apartheid- The South Africa’s commitment to addressing the housing
era evictions. The court said that it was unreasonable for crisis is reflected within its legal framework. The
the government to fail in making any emergency provision Constitution protects a right of access to adequate
for people who are in a desperate situation. The people housing in section 26 (Act No 108 of 1996). It also
could not be left literally homeless for ten to twenty years. endorses the right to equality. Non-racialism and non-
The implication of the judgment was that the sexism are among the foundational values of the
programmeme must give top priority attention to people Constitution (s 1(b)). Section 9(1) of the Constitution
who are in a desperate situation. The programmeme recognises that everyone is equal before the law and has
must cater for short, medium and long term needs. It the right to equal protection and benefit of the law. Section
must not exclude a significant segment of society. 9(2) expressly recognises that equality includes the full
and equal enjoyment of all rights and freedoms. In
The facts addition to section 9(3) prohibiting unfair discrimination
The petitioners received a court order requiring the on a host of grounds which include sex and gender,
government to immediately provide them with adequate section 9(2) specifically recognises that special measures
basic housing and not to wait for their turn in the formal may be adopted to promote the achievement of equality
housing queue. However, the government failed to amongst previously disadvantaged groups.
121. Id, at 9, 10
122. Id, at 29, 35
151
In the groundbreaking decision of government of Republic There was no provision in any policy, whether national,
of South Africa and Others vs Grootboom and Others provincial or local, that applied to her desperate situation.
2000 (11) BCLR 1169 (CC) (hereafter Grootboom), the
Constitutional Court sought to give effect to housing rights The court said that in order for a policy to be reasonable,
as provided for in section 26. In doing so, it pronounced on it cannot ignore those whose needs are most urgent. A
key principles. These principles specifically relate to people policy aimed at providing access to housing cannot be
“who have no access to land, no roof over their heads, for aimed at long-term statistical progress only. Those in
people who are living in intolerable conditions and for people desperate need must not be ignored. Their immediate
who are in crisis because of natural disasters such as floods need can be met by ‘second-best’ facilities, which might
and fires, or because their homes are under threat of fall short of acceptable housing standards, but which,
demolition” (para 52). nevertheless, provide a basic form of shelter. The court
also stressed that its judgment must not be seen as an
The judgment
approval of land invasion in order to ‘jump the queue’.
In its judgment (Government of the Republic of South
Africa vs Grootboom 2000 (11) BCLR 1169), the The court order
Constitutional Court distinguished between the negative In the order, the court declared that the comprehensive
obligation to refrain from impairing the right to housing housing programmeme, called for by section 26(2) of the
and the positive obligation to take measures to provide Constitution, must include measures ‘to provide relief for
access to housing. This case tested the latter part of the people who have no access to land, no roof over their
right of access to housing, namely the measures that the heads, and who are living in intolerable conditions or crisis
State had taken. The court made it clear that it was not situations’. The State housing programmeme that applied
for the judiciary to enquire whether better measures could in the area of the Cape Metropolitan Council at the time
have been adopted but rather to determine whether or of the launch of the application fell short of this obligation.
not the State had violated the right of access to housing
“In any challenge based on section 26 in which it is argued
of the people concerned. It sought to do this by asking
that the State has failed to meet the positive obligations
the following question: Were the measures taken by the
imposed upon it by section 26(2), the question will be
State reasonable? The ‘measures’ called for by section
whether the legislative and other measures taken by the
26(2) involve more than legislation alone and have to be
State are reasonable.”123 The court then explained: “To
supported by appropriate policies, programmemes and
determine whether the nationwide housing
budgetary support. In determining the ‘reasonableness’
programmeme as applied in the Cape Metro [municipal
of the measures taken by the State, the resources it has at
area] is reasonable within the meaning of the section, one
its disposal are an important factor.
must consider whether the absence of a component catering
The Constitution does not expect more than the State for those in desperate need is reasonable under the
can afford. The court examined the State housing circumstances.”124 The Court then concluded that given
programmeme and concluded that what had been done the long-term and large-scale nature of the housing
so far was a major achievement. The programmeme at shortage, the government’s housing policy “fell short of
national, provincial and local level represents a systematic the requirements of section 26(2) in that no provision
response to a pressing social need. Considerable thought, was made for relief to the categories of people in
energy and resources have been devoted to housing desperate need.”125
delivery and the overall programmeme is aimed at realising
access to housing for all. Its long- and medium-term The State had an obligation to ensure, at the very least, that
objectives could not be criticised. However, the court the eviction was humanely executed. However, the eviction
found that the State had neglected the short-term aspect. was reminiscent of the past and inconsistent with the values
It was clear that no real policy existed which could be of the Constitution. The respondents were evicted a day
applied to people in need of housing in crisis situations. early and to make matters worse, their possessions and
Apart from the normal channels, namely application for building materials were not merely removed, but destroyed
low-cost housing, which normally takes years, there was and burnt. The court already said that the provisions of
no relief for Mrs Grootboom, her children and her peers. section 26(1) of the Constitution burdened the State with
123. Id, at 33, 41
124. Id, at 52, 63 (emphasis added)
125. Id, at 55, 69
132. S.6 PIE provides for circumstances in which a municipality may apply to evict unlawful occupiers
133. Section 6(3)(a) PIE
134. Section 6(3)(b) PIE
135. Section 6(3)(c) PIE
Decision: The court held that, on the facts, the CPs Constitutional Court of South Africa, Case CCT 20/04,
constituted a group of people who had lived on and 13 May 2005
worked the farm continuously for 50 years until they Keywords: Eviction - compensation – housing rights
were relocated to another farm in the late 1930s. Although – right to a remedy
their settlement at the new farm was initially intended to
be temporary, it ended up being near-permanent. Facts: This judgment dealt with two related matters.
The first was an application for leave to appeal an eviction
Although the CPs were not the legal owners of the land
order granted under the Prevention of Illegal Eviction
at issue, they had held it exclusively, as a group and in and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act (PIE)36 by the
common with each other, in accordance with the customs High Court against 40 000 illegal occupiers of a farm
and traditions of the Ndebele-Ndzundza people. The owned by Modderklip Boerdery. The second matter
court held that the claimants had rights in the land in involved an attempt on the part of the landowner to get
terms of the Act in (at least) the form of a customary the State to enforce the eviction order.
137.While the term ‘gypsy’ has often been used and experienced as a derogatory term, that is not the intention here. In the UK, in the
context of planning and local authority law, the term ‘gypsy’ has the specific meaning of anyone – regardless of race or origin – who
is of a nomadic habit of life and travels around for economic reasons (Source: Your rights - Liberty’s online guide to human rights law
for England and Wales).
The court held that the State failed to succeed in striking Decision: The European Court held that an interference
a fair balance between the interest of the town’s with the home in the context of Article 8 of the European
economic well-being in having a waste-treatment plant, Convention will be considered “necessary in a democratic
and the applicant’s effective enjoyment of her individual society” for a legitimate aim if it answers a “pressing
right to respect for her home and her private and family social need” and, in particular, if it is proportionate to
life. Consequently, it held that there had been a violation the legitimate aim pursued. In this regard there is a “margin
of Article 8 of the Convention and awarded of appreciation” left to the national authorities who are
better placed than an international court to evaluate local
compensation.
needs and conditions. The court stated that “this margin
The court held further that the conditions in which the will vary considerably according to the nature of the
applicant and her family had lived did not amount to Convention rights at issue, its importance for the
degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3. individual and the nature of the activities restricted, as
well as the nature of the aim pursued by the restrictions.
Selçuk and Asker vs Turkey The margin will tend to be narrower where the right at
European Court of Human Rights, (1998) 26 EHRR stake is crucial to the individual’s effective enjoyment of
477 intimate or key rights. The court went on to state that
Keywords: Housing rights – property rights – forced Article 8 concerns rights of central importance to the
evictions – inhuman treatment individual’s identity, self-determination, physical and
moral integrity, maintenance of relationships with others
Facts: The applicants argued that the destruction of and a settled and secure place in the community. The
their homes by Turkish military forces was, inter alia, a serious interference with the applicant’s rights under Article
violation of their rights to respect for the home and 8 requires, in the courts opinion, particularly weighty
peaceful enjoyment of their property. They also claimed reasons of public interest by way of justification, and the
that the circumstances of the destruction of their homes margin of appreciation to be afforded to the national
and their eviction from their village constituted a breach authorities must be regarded as correspondingly narrowed.
of Article 3 of the Convention, which states that no one The procedural safeguards available to the individual will
shall be subject to torture or to inhuman or degrading be especially important in determining whether a State has
treatment or punishment. remained within its margin of appreciation.
Decision: The court held that there had been a violation The European Court held that the mere fact that “anti-
of the applicants’ rights to peaceful enjoyment of their social behaviour” occurs on local authority gypsy sites
property and right to respect for their homes. cannot, in itself, justify a summary power f eviction. The
Furthermore, the court held that, bearing in mind the existence of procedural safeguards is a crucial
manner in which the applicants’ homes were destroyed consideration in the Court’s assessment of the
and their personal circumstances, they had been subject proportionality of the interference. Finding a violation
to inhuman treatment in violation of Article 3. Due to of Article 8, the Court held that the eviction of the
the absolute nature of Article 3, any such violation is applicant was not attended by the requisite procedural
unjustifiable, even in times of national emergency. safeguards, namely the requirement to establish proper
justification for the serious interference with his rights.
Connors vs United Kingdom Consequently, it could not be regarded as justified by
European Court of Human Rights, Application No “pressing social need” or proportionate to the legitimate
66746/01 (27 May 2004). aim being pursued.
(iii) the systematic eviction of Roma from sites or In relation to the second aspect of the complaint, (ii), the
dwellings considered to be unlawfully occupied by committee noted that the law set out extremely strict
them. The complainants alleged that these facts conditions for temporary encampment and amenities and
constituted a violation of Article 16 of the Charter139 that, due to the local authorities’ lack of diligence in
or Article 16 in light of the Preamble 140 of the selecting appropriate sites, as well as their reluctance to
European Social Charter. carry out the necessary works to provide the appropriate
infrastructure, Roma had an insufficient supply of
Decision: The European Committee of Social Rights appropriate camping sites. This situation constituted a
noted that the right to housing permits the exercise of violation of Article 16 of the Charter. With regard to the
Keywords: Indigenous peoples – land and property Facts: As a result of the Brazilian government’s sanctioning
rights – obligation to protect – compensation of the exploitation of the Amazonias by means of a road-
building programme, the Yanomami Indians were
Facts: The complainants requested a ruling from the displaced from their ancestral land and were exposed to
court requiring that Nicaragua compensate the Awas epidemics including influenza, tuberculosis, measles and
Tingni Indians for the encroachment on their land caused others. They argued that the government had not taken
by the government’s approval of destructive logging adequate action to address these health crises.
concessions on indigenous communal lands, without
consultation with or agreement from the affected Decision: The failure of the Brazilian government to
communities. It was alleged that Nicaragua had failed to fulfil their positive obligations to provide the Yanomami
carry out its legal duty to demarcate and legally secure Indians with a park for the protection of their heritage or
indigenous lands. to protect them from disease and ill-health amounted to,
Decision: The court held that Article 21 of the American inter alia, a violation of their right to residence and movement
Convention on Human Rights protects the right to and the right to the preservation of health and to wellbeing
property in a sense, which includes the rights of members as recognised in Articles VIII and XI of the American
of the indigenous communities within the framework Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man. The
of communal property. It stated that the government commission recommended that, among other things, “the
had breached Article 21 of the Convention by failing to government of Brazil continue to take preventive and
demarcate the indigenous lands of the community and curative health measures to protect the lives and health of
by not taking other effective measures to ensure the Indians exposed to infectious or contagious diseases.”
property rights of the community to its ancestral lands Full text of the decision: http://www.wcl.american.edu/pub/humright/
and natural resources. The Court granted monetary digest/interamerican/english/annual/1984_85/res1285.html
T
he UN-HABITAT and the Office of the United List of reports
Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Housing Rights Legislation
(OHCHR) launched the United Nations Housing A review of housing rights in international and national law,
Rights Programme (UNHRP) in 2002 as a joint initiative. including a discussion of housing-rights as progressive legal
The establishment of the programme was a direct obligations, the report also reviews selected adjudication, eg
response to the United Nations Commission on Human how housing rights legislation is being implemented. The
Settlements resolution 16/7 and United Nations report illustrates that effective constitutional and
Commission on Human Rights resolutions legislative measures on the right to adequate housing
2001/28 and 2001/34. are not only realistic but have already been used
successfully in a number of countries. The
The objective of the UNHRP is to assist States examples presented provide a framework for
and other stakeholders with the implementation model legislation with respect to specific
of their commitments in the Habitat Agenda to components of the right to adequate housing.
ensure full and progressive realisation of the right
to adequate housing as provided for in the international International Instruments on Housing Rights
instruments. This substantive focus is grounded in the A compilation with excerpts of relevant international
Habitat Agenda, in particular paragraph 61, which states, instruments on housing rights includes ratification information
“Within the overall context of an enabling approach, the and interpretative documents by the United Nations
governments should take appropriate action in order to Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (such as
promote, protect and ensure full and progressive realisation the full text of relevant General Comments to the International
of the right to adequate housing”. The UNHRP is based Covenant on Civil and Political Rights), and other entities. The
on the mandates of both UN-HABITAT and OHCHR, latter includes the full texts of two of the most important
and operates as a fundamental tool for the Global interpretative texts relating to economic, social and cultural
Campaign for Secure Tenure. The UNHRP is rights: the Limburg Principles on the Implementation of the
implemented in close consultation with the Special International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rapporteur on adequate housing and relevant United Rights and the Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Nations treaty bodies, such as the Committee on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. National Housing Rights Legislation
This is a compilation of constitutional clauses with respect
The civil society and non-governmental organisations, women’s to housing rights. It also contains the full texts or excerpts
organisations, national human rights institutions, research and of selected legislation related to housing from several
academic institutions and associations of relevant professions States – representing a variety of legal, political, economic
and local authorities are expected to play important roles as and cultural systems and traditions. The compilation is
partners in the implementation of the UNHRP. not comprehensive, yet, it is representative of the various
The first phase of the UNHRP (2002-2004) focuses on means by which States have chosen to include housing
five programme areas: advocacy, outreach and learning rights, including their obligations regarding international
instruments, within their domestic legal systems.
from partners; support for the United Nations human
rights mechanisms on housing rights; monitoring and Compilation of Selected Adjudication on
evaluation of the progress of realisation of housing rights Housing Rights
(including development of housing rights indicators); A compilation of selected court cases related to housing
research-analysis of housing rights (promotion and rights and other adjudication from national and international
development of relevant norms, standards and guidelines legal institutions, including the European Court of Human
as well as thematic research on housing rights); and Rights. Includes relevant excerpts of national legislation
capacity-building and technical co-operation (assistance critically reviewed by the United Nations Committee on
to States and other stakeholders in building capacities for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
implementation and monitoring of housing rights). Source: http://www.unhabitat.org/unhrp
165
Guidelines on development-based
evictions and displacement
Milloon Kothari *
* Milloon Kothari, an architect by profession, is actively involved with the housing rights movement for more than two decades. He is a
special rapporteur of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR), on adequate housing as a component of the right to
an adequate standard of living. He is affiliated to the Habitat International Coalition, New Delhi, India
th e de claratio n s
O
n World Habitat Day, October 4, 2004,
a rally was held from Rajghat to Jantarpavements of 36 cities from all over the country,
met under the banner of the India Habitat
Mantar in the national capital of Delhi.
Campaign in New Delhi, 1-4 October 2004,
After the rally, a delegation of ten persons met the
President APJ Abdul Kalam and presented the organised by the National Forum for Housing
“Delhi Declaration” memorandum to him for the Rights India and Human Rights Law
right to adequate housing for all. Network, New Delhi. After intensive sharing
of the deteriorating situations regarding housing
Preamble due to globalisation, liberalisation and
We, as organisations involved in the survival privatisation and after field visits at the relocated
struggles of unorganised sector labour and urban sites in Delhi, we resolve the following:
“We the slum, pavement dwellers and the homeless persons of India are to put forth
Declaration to the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government to implement
workable solutions for our miseries in accordance with the National Common Minimum
Programme.
“We the citizens are the victims and soft targets of land grabbers in the country who
occupy our lands in the name of so-called development at (extremely subsidised costs
and gain huge direct or indirect profits) while we are continuously squeezed in lesser and
lesser urban space.
“We the unorganised workers are treated as secondary citizens by continuously being
dragged out of the city to untenable and undeveloped lands on the pretext of city-
beautification/ urban-renewal while our children starve at remote areas without livelihood,
basic amenities or services.
“We the small entrepreneurs are the driving force of the cities’ economy and we contribute
at least 62 percent of economic product and form more than 85 percent of employment,
still our enterprises are deemed as illegal, demolished, deprived and our productivity for
enhancing the cities’ infrastructure is undermined.
“We the informal manual labourers who toil day and night in city’s infrastructure
development work in constructing roads, multi-complexes, commercial and residential
buildings, yet none of us receive the mandated minimum wages envisaged under the law
and hence we are not able to meet our basic needs like adequate shelter, children’s
education and health care. Consequently we the citizens of India after 57 years of
Independence live on the pavements or shanty homes facing everyday insecurity and
threat of evictions and are left unsheltered during rains, winter and scorching heat!
171
“We, the toiling people, unorganised workers in the city and countryside, are affected
particularly by mechanisation, liberalisation and import policies under globalisation,
that deprive us of work and livelihood and force us to migrate where work is
available. The common struggle against mechanisation, globalisation and
liberalisation is a must to stop rural and urban destitution.
“We the urban poor who constitute half of the city’s population reside in less than
one-twentieth of the urban space and that too in pockets that are extremely marginal,
but in spite of this fact the present policies of the Centre, state and local bodies
have failed in addressing the issues of gross inequality. Nor have they planned for
a long-term comprehensive workable solution to resolve this impending habitational
crisis.
“We the urban poor are not creating slums in cities, but slum like situations are created due to
unjust and inequitable landholding. Proliferation of slums and homelessness are the consequences
of the failed policies, bad governance, uncontrolled looting, rigged markets and wrong priorities
leaving out the housing needs of the majority of the population and facilitating the profiteers to
occupy more and more urban space for their limited and selfish greed.
“We emphasise on integrating housing needs of the poor into mainstream planning from
which we are usually excluded.
“We the citizens of India have come with great expectation that the UPA government
will surely work towards formulating pragmatic solutions to resolve the impending
housing crisis for the whole unorganised sector workers’ pressing habitat demands in
accordance with the National Common Minimum Programme.”
Common Demands 5. Access to land for housing for the urban poor near
1. Appeal for Constitution amendment to incorporate their place of occupation and livelihood will be
‘Right to Housing’ as a fundamental right for all feasible when urban land and property is not
citizens of the country. controlled and concentrated in the hands of a few.
Hence we appeal to the UPA government to
2. Reserve 30 percent of land in all residential land-use reintroduce the Urban Land (Ceiling &
areas (public or private) in urban and Regulation) Act, 1976 with clear pro-poor
semi-urban cities for meeting the
Courtesy:Tehelka, Oct 23, 04
provisions.
habitat needs of all unorganised
sector workers within the city limits. In majority of the cities there are Urban
Ceiling Lands acquired by the state
3. The UPA government must ensure governments and union territories, which are
that the urban poor inhabitants must being surreptitiously transferred in the interest
not be forcefully evicted and care of the rich and powerful. Hence, the Cenre
must be taken that the unorganised must direct the states and union territories
sector workers are provided World Habitat Day rally, in Delhi that the urban ceiling lands, which had been
adequate housing near their place of acquired before the Repealing of the Land Ceiling
occupation and livelihood as promised under the Act must be specifically allocated and used for housing
CMP. the urban poor.
4. The National Slum Policy Draft (1999) introduced 6. New laws like the industrial area and township
by the NDA government is recommended for development Acts introduced and amended for the
further amendments/ modifications in line with the purpose of large mega projects, or hi-tech economies,
CMP and should be placed for public debate and be repealed and their special purpose bodies brought
then tabled before Parliament. under elected wings of the local bodies.
8. Like the National Women’s Commission and the A reconsideration of the Supreme Court’s ‘black
Minority Commission, the UPA government should laws’ that restrict access to the basic services and
also set up a national commission on housing and infrastructure.
include it in the agenda of the National Human 13. As the UPA government is intending to introduce
Rights Commission. Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for the rural
population, similar urban employment guarantee
9. Allocate appropriate budget in proportion of urban
scheme must be replicated in urban centres for the
poor in cities in the 10th Five-Year Plan.
economically weaker sections.
10. The central government must direct the National
14. The nationalised and private banks must be directed
Labour Commission to incorporate actual expenses to provide housing loans to the urban poor,
on housing, health; education while calculating and unorganised sector workers and logical mechanisms
fixing the statutory minimum wages and the must be created for repayments based on the actual
minimum wages should be strictly implemented. A income and expenses of the urban poor.
considerable degree of exclusion of poor happens
due to very narrow definitions of poverty. There is 15. Strengthen and fund in substantial terms the social
a need to include costs of living (housing and basic welfare programmes like the Public Distribution
services, education, health) in computing both System (PDS), Integrated Child Development
poverty lines and minimum wages that enable people Scheme (ICDS), basic health and education, etc.
to live above poverty standards. These hold true for 16. As per the 74th Amendment and Article 243-G
the PDS system as well as poverty alleviation schedule-12, security of tenure and urban planning
programmes. These standards should be evolved at must be included as a mandatory function in urban
the local ie municipal level and should be common local bodies.
across all departments and schemes.
17. Land title must be allotted in the name of women
11. Transfer lands owned by the public authorities like and all sections of the urban poor must be entitled
railways, Defence and other central government with tenure security for their housing. The
organisations to the local bodies where they are recommendations of the National Commission for
presently being occupied by poorer settlements. Title Women from their public hearings on women and
to the occupant of this land should be given in the globalisation must be immediately implemented.
name of women irrespective of their marital status Especially, struggle against globalisation and
and the local bodies should be directed to extend mechanisation must be strengthened to curb need
basic services and infrastructure. for migration.
12. We oppose the international money lender and 18. Basic services like potable water, electricity,
maintenance of sewage, drainage lines and regular
developer driven scheme of squeezing the poor into
garbage clearance must be provided in priority to
lesser space in the name of in-situ multistory housing
all poor settlements.
by land sharing where the developer earns huge
profit by freeing the land occupied by the poor and 19. Basic amenities like rationshops, schools and public
selling the flats and commercial spaces in the open health centres, child care services, etc., must be
market and by getting transferable development provided rationally taking into account the norms
rights. Experience has shown clear evidence that the based on population in each settlement.
rules of such a developer driven scheme ensures 20. Urban Street Vendor Policy formed for street
that only 25 percent of the occupants get flats which vendors, which has was passed by Parliament in
are worse than their previous dwelling and with December 2003, should be implemented on the
substantial and unaffordable hidden costs. ground by forming the ward committees.
W
orld Charter on the Right to the City
was first initiated at the World Social current development models.
Forum in Porto Alegré in 2000. The Faced with this reality, the civil society entities that
Charter defines the equitable use of cities so that have maintained contact since the First World Social
the values of sustainable use of cities, democracy Forum in 2001, having analysed and debated the
and social justice is upheld and safeguarded. The problem, took up the challenge to propose a
Charter acknowledges the collective rights of the sustainable model for urban society and lifestyle,
inhabitants of cities – especially the most based on first principles of solidarity, liberty,
vulnerable and marginalised groups – to act and equality, dignity and social justice. A fundamental
organise to achieve appropriate living standards. aspect of this model shall be the respect for different
urban cultures and the balance between the urban
Preamble and rural environments.
As we enter this new millennium, half the world
population lives in cities and predictions are that Ever since the First World Social Forum (held in
by 2005 the degree of urbanisation will have the city of Porto Alegré, Brazil in 2001), a group of
social movements, non-governmental organisations,
reached 65 percent. Potentially, the cities are areas
professional associations, fora and country and
of great riches and economic, environmental, international networks concerned with the social
political and cultural diversity. The urban lifestyle struggle for cities to be more democratic, just,
influences the manner by which we establish ties human and sustainable, have been drafting a World
with our fellow human beings and with the territory. Charter in which are depicted the responsibilities
and measures to be undertaken by civil society, local
However, contrary to this potential, in the
authorities and national governments and
development models currently implemented in the international organisations to guarantee that all
majority of third world cities we find only people live with dignity in the cities.
concentration of income and power and accelerated
urbanisation processes which contribute to the The Charter on the Right to the City is an instrument
intended as a contribution to the urban struggle and
degradation of the environment and the as an aid in the process of recognition of the right
privatisation of public spaces generating social and to the city in the international human rights system.
physical segregation. The core element of this right is the equitable
Most cities are far from offering equitable conditions usufruct of the cities considering the principles of
sustainability and social justice. This right shall be
and opportunities to their inhabitants. A
understood as a collective right of all city
considerable portion of the urban population is inhabitants, especially those vulnerable and
deprived or limited in the satisfaction of their basic disfavoured, conferring legitimacy of action and
necessities because of their economic, social, organisation in accordance with their usages and
cultural, or ethic characteristic or because of gender customs in the search of full exercise of the right
or age. This favours the emergence of to an adequate standard of living. Therefore, the
representative social movements that struggle for specific focus on the Rights of the City is justified
urban rights although usually fragmented and by the following observations:
The traditional approach to improvement of the quality manifestation of opinion; public security and the right to
of city life centred on housing and suburban living, has a pacific existence.
to be extended to focus on the quality of living in the city
Furthermore, in addition to guaranteeing the human rights
as means of benefiting the entire population of a city (or
of the people, the city territory, urban or rural, is the
an entire region in accelerated urbanisation).
space and place where collective rights are to be practiced
This means emphasising new means for the promotion, and assured, as a means of achieving the equable
protection and defence of the distribution and enjoyment of
economic, social, cultural, civil the resources, riches, services,
and political human rights property and opportunity of
guaranteed in the respective the cities. In this respect, it should
international human rights be borne in mind that the
instruments, by utilising distinct Charter of Collective Rights
forms of democratic enumerates the collective rights
participation and the fulfilment of all city inhabitants: the right
of the social function of the city to a proper environment, to
and property. The right to a participate in the public planning
democratic, just, equitable and An overiew of the Mumbai slums an management, to collective
sustainable city presupposes the transport and mobility, to legal
full and universal exercise by all the inhabitants of the rights and justice.
entire spectrum of economic, social, cultural, civil and
In the city, the co-relation between these rights and the
political rights enshrined in International Human Rights
necessary counterpart of duties is required in accordance
Covenants and Conventions: the right to work under with different responsibilities and economic situation of
favourable work conditions; to form Labour Unions; the inhabitants as a means of promoting the fair
to a family life; to effective social security; to an adequate distribution of the benefits and expenses resulting from
standard of living; to food and clothing; to a suitable the urbanisation process, the urban income, the democratic
home, health, water, education; the right to maintain their access to land and the public services by the poorer
culture; to political participation; free association; assembly; segment of the population.
Dear, M (1981), “Urbanisation and Urban Planning In Jha Lalit K, Slum relocation remains an uphill task, The
Capitalist Society” London, Methuen & Co Ltd Hindu, September 21, 2002, New Delhi
Desai, AR and Pillai, S.D. (1990),”Slums and Urbanisation”, Jha, SS (1986),”Structure of Urban Poverty—The Case of Bombay
Bombay (2nd edition) Slums”, Bombay, Popular Prakashan
Manorama Year Book 2002, World Population pp 76, Supreme Court Cases – (2000), Volume 2, pp 679, Almitra
Malayalam Manorama Press, Kottayam, India H. Patel & others vs UOI & others
Mukhija, Vinit (2001), “Upgrading Housing Settlements in Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board – (2000), Government
of Tamil Nadu, Chennai
Developing Countries: The Impact of Existing Physical
Conditions”. Cities Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 213-222 Thomas TM – (2000), The Urban Economy, Alternative
Economic Survey 1998-2000, No. 95, Rainbow Publishers
Menon, A G Krishna – (1997), Imagining the Indian City,
Ltd., Delhi
Economic and Political Weekly Vol 32 No 46, Bombay
Thumma Anthoniraj – (2000), In Deep Waters – Housing
Ministry of Urban Affairs and Employment – (1999) Rights and Flood in Hi-Tech Hyderabad, CHATRI
National Slum Policy (Draft), Ministry of Urban Affairs Publication, Hyderabad
and Employment, Government of India, New Delhi
Tindall, Gillian (1992),” City of Gold”, Penguin Books
NFHR – (2004) Workshop Housing Rights Bill: Support
Reading Material, Nagpur UN-HABITAT – (2002) Housing Rights Legislation:
United Nations Housing Rights Programme, Report 1
Payne, k. Geoffrey (1977), “Urban housing in the third world”,
Vagale LR – (2000), Housing and Urban Development
London
Authorities Laws in Bangalore, Housing Legislation in India.
Patel, SB — 1995. Slum rehabilitation: 40 lakh free
Venkatarayappa, KN (1971), “Slums: A Study of Urban
lunches?. Economic and Political Weekly 30 40, pp. 2473–2476
Problem”, Sterling Publishers (P) LTD, New Delhi
Patel, Sujata and Thorner, Alice (1995),” Metaphor for Modern
Wheaton, WC and Shishido H – (1981) Urban
India”, Bombay, Oxford University Press Concentration, Agglomeration Economies and the levels
Patel, Sujata and Thorner, Alice (1995),” Bombay: Mosaic of of Economic Development, Economic Development and
Modern Culture”, Bombay: Oxford University Press Cultural Change, 30:17-30
Prabhavathi, PVS (1992), “Housing and development”, WP 1777/85 – Indramma Nagaram Slum Dwellers Welfare
Allahabad, Chugh Publications Association vs State of Andhra Pradesh Order dated Feb
28, 1988, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Hyderabad
Ramachandran, K — Embers of burnt hutments smolder,
YUVA – (2002) – Rebuilding from Ruins: Listening to the
so do the victims, The Hindu, November 26, 2000, Chennai
voices from Gujarat and restoring people’s right to housing,
Report of the National Commission on Urbanisation 1988 livelihood and life, HIC-HRLN, Delhi
183 References
an n e xu re s
Major events
T
his section highlights all chronological events over 1996: India became a signatory to the Istanbul Declaration,
the years in which international policies were which reaffirmed the role of the United Nation 1976
formulated as well as national policies, laws, Acts Declaration of Human Settlement, namely adequate
and regulations implemented and also interventions made shelter and services are a basic human right which places
by civil society organisations to demand right to adequate an obligation on governments to ensure their attainment
housing specifically focusing to urban poor habitat. by all people”.
1956: The Slum Areas (Clearance and Improvement) Act 1996: General Comment 7 of the UN Committee
was enacted to provide for the improvement and clearance appointed under the International Covenant on Economic
of slum areas in certain union territories and for the Social and Cultural Rights 1956 of which India is a
protection of tenants in such areas from eviction. This Act signatory says: “Evictions should not result in individuals
was further enacted in other Indian states in the Seventies. being rendered homeless or vulnerable to the violation
1961: Principle 2 of the International Labour Organisation of other human right. The State Party must take all
(ILO) in Recommendation number 115 has emphasised appropriate measures to the maximum of its available
on the framing of a general housing policy, which would resources, to ensure that adequate alternative housing,
ensure that housing construction, be carried out in a decent resettlement or access to productive land, as the case may
environment. be, is available.”
1966: Article 11 (1) of the International Covenant on 1996: The National Housing and Habitat Policy was
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) provides passed by the ministry of urban affairs and employment,
that State Parties recognise and undertake to take adequate Government in India promising the target of the
measures for the realisation of the right of everyone to construction of a million houses every year to cover up
adequate standard of living for himself and his family the housing deficit. The policy inter-alia described the grim
including adequate food, clothing and housing. situation on the housing front therein acknowledging that
1976: The Vancouver Declaration on Human Settlements the problem was compounded by the uncontrolled
in Section III (8) describes adequate shelter as a basic growth in population, which frustrated all public efforts
human right and places an obligation upon governments in housing and infrastructure development. The policy
in this regard especially with respect to the least further described that the previous policy initiatives had
advantaged sections of society. been ailing from financial shortfalls among others and
had failed to rectify the housing problem.
1987: The Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) of
the United Nations Resolution 1987/62 entitled "The The policy reiterated the estimated housing shortage of
Realisation of the Right to Adequate Housing" recognised 22.90 million units as pegged by the Census 1991 data
that by virtue of the provisions of the Universal and declared a national agenda for housing. This agenda
Declaration of Human Rights and the ICESCR all declared “housing for all as a priority area——” with
persons have the right to an adequate standard of living emphasis upon the needs of the poor and deprived
for themselves and their families, including adequate sections of society and aiming at providing quality and
housing, and that States should take appropriate steps to cost effective housing and shelter options especially for
ensure the realisation of this right. the vulnerable groups. Setting a target of construction
of two million housing units every year the agenda
1987: Declared as the International Year for the Homeless. delineated the functions and responsibilities at all levels
of government, the central and state governments as well
1987: The UN Global Shelter Strategy (GSS) embodies
as the local authorities.
the minimum requirements of International Housing
Policy and has as its chief objective, the attainment of 1996: The Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Repeal
adequate housing for everyone by the year 2000. Act was passed by Parliament.
Definitions
189 Definitions
lowest one-fifth of the cases, and so on. Quintiles should purposes, so long as they meet the criteria of walls and
be presented for certain financial characteristics such as floor space. Passageways, verandas, lobbies, bathrooms
housing costs and income. and toilet rooms are not supposed to be counted as
rooms, even if they meet the criteria.
Renter occupied housing
All occupied housing units, which are not owner, Social housing/public housing
occupied, and are rented for cash rent or otherwise Housing financed, constructed and/or allocated by the State
occupied for payment. or public sector, generally designated for low-income groups.
Social housing is generally kept at affordable rent levels or,
Room when involving owner-occupation, financed with low-
A room may be defined as a space in a housing unit or interest loans or credit. This type of housing is provided by
other living quarters enclosed by walls reaching from the the State. In market economies, social/public housing is
floor to the ceiling or roof covering, or at least to a provided for persons with limited income or wealth.
height of two metres, of a size large enough to hold a
bed for an adult, that is at least four sqms. Rooms, Squatter
therefore, may include bedrooms, dining rooms, living A person occupying an otherwise abandoned housing
rooms, studies, habitable attics, servants’ rooms, kitchens, unit or land without legal title to that unit or land. For
rooms used for professional or business purposes and example, persons who take up residence in unused or
other separate spaces used or intended for dwelling abandoned dwellings or buildings are squatters.
The people’s charter was distributed to the regional and People’s charter condemns forceful large-scale eviction
national political parties, contesting candidates, civil of slum dwellers in recent times and also condemns some
societies including trade unions, women’s organisations, of the Supreme Court judgments calling slum dwellers
to incorporate urban poor habitat issues in their election as “encroachers, pickpockets and anti-socials”.
manifesto/agenda. The forum received letters of We, the urban poor and 115 representatives from
acknowledgements from all Left Parties and the BJP who Hyderabad, Vijayawada, Visakhapatnam, Nalgonda,
had received the People’s Charter on Housing Rights. Kurnool, New Delhi, Chennai, Coimbatore, Ahmedabad,
The workshop was organised by the National Forum Indore, Jaipur, Nathdwara, Lucknow, Kolkata and
for Housing Rights, India, and Campaign for Housing Howrah, put forth the following demands to the political
and Tenurial Rights, (CHATRI) Hyderabad, in parties in the event of Parliamentary elections - 2004.
Charter of demands
1. Adequate housing along with compulsory, quality, equitable education, quality health care, skill up
gradation for all, including urban poor, with special focus on women, children and disabled, should be
provided with in a five years time frame by the State.
2. To ensure right to housing for urban poor with appropriate laws, including land laws such as ‘Public
Land Encroachment and Regularisation Act’ and Urban Land Ceiling Act must be amended,
enacted, repealed and policies must be framed and implemented. In addition to this, adequate finance
must be provided with quality basic amenities at minimum rate.
191
3. No developmental scheme that serves only the affluent sections of the city and involves evictions,
displacement of urban poor must be carried out. If the land is needed for public purpose that serves the
urban poor also, then the alternate accommodation, with adequate infrastructure, to their nearest working
place must be given to the affected urban poor, with their participation, before them being evicted.
4. Liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation (LPG) have created havoc in the lives of urban poor,
denying them their right to livelihood, leading to displacement, unemployment, bonded labour, indebtedness,
trafficking of women and children, alcoholism and suicide. Hence, India should quit from WTO.
5. Undertake legislative and administrative reforms to eradicate legal and social barriers for the equitable
access to land for housing and protection of tenure rights and basic amenities to urban poor inhabitants.
6. Review of all the State laws and Supreme Court judgments that have a bearing on the urban poor and
enact a national housing Act for the urban poor with the consultation of all the stakeholders.
7. The process of decentralisation of power to the municipal local bodies as envisaged in the 74th
Constitutional Amendment should be expedited and ward participation must be ensured.
8. Supreme Court’s interpretation of Article 21 as including the Right to Livelihood, the Right to Housing
and Right to Dignity must be upheld under all circumstances.
9. Ensure under law that equal rights for women and men on land and property are protected.
10.Five percent of the GDP must be allocated for housing. Fifty percent of this amount must be allotted
to the housing for urban poor.
11.According to the proportion of the population of the urban poor in the city, residential land must be
allocated that include services in the city/town/metropolitan Master Plan.
12.The urban poor being the unorganised workers, the central government must enact a comprehensive
unorganised workers bill ensuing, regulation of employment, improving the conditions of work and
social security.
13.All urban poor must be covered under BPL (below poverty line) and provided with ration cards. To
participate in the electoral process, they must be provided with election identity cards.
14. Since the urban poor faces brutal oppression and torture from the police and administration often, the
central government must ratify immediately the UN Convention Against Torture.
193
Annexure - V
195
There are nine Nagars in Kallukutai namely: Ambedkar Puratchi Nagar, Anjugam Ammaiyar Nagar, JJ Nagar, Ambedkar
Colony, Ambedkar Nagar, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Ranuva Kudirupu, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar andSanthya Nagar.
According to Mrs Anguthai, local Secretary of the AIDWA, the entire are of Kallukttai under the Perungudi Town
Panchayat is neglected by the government .The district administration and local body is not providing electricity,
road, water supply and sanitations and garbage collection. As for water supply, the colony had been provided 17
water tanks with a capacity of 1000 litres each. Water tankers supply water to these tanks erratically and it is not
adequate. People have to walk more than two kilometres to take water from the roadside. The people have voters
ID and ration cards. Mostly they are daily wage labourers and unorganised workers. People complained that the
snakes and other creatures would come every day. The average size of the family is five people. Most of the
occupants have migrated to this area from the city proper. Kallukuttai is a ‘Nagar of Huts’, with thatched houses and
no proper flooring. During summer water is a major problem for the residents. Roads are in very poor shape and
therefore riding bicycle on these roads is quite dangerous. During heavy rains, roads disappear and the whole area is
a sheet of water and boat service is the only option to commute.
Incidents
Ms Kanmani, an activist, related the history of the settlement and the problems faced by the people. There are 10,000
families, according to her. The women’s groups have organised themselves and had to struggle for many years before
they could get water supply through tankers. Ms Kanmani said that two years before the things were really bad, five
thousand women came out on the main road and did a road roko, which attracted the attention of the authorities
towards the problem of non-availability of electricity. They met district collector and other officials so many times in
this regard. They also had fasting programme in front of Perungudi Town Panchayat. Protest march held in number of
times. Twice a month for the past five years, the women representatives went to the Secretariat to submit their petition
for basic services to this huge settlement. The residents wanted to register their protest as power connection; water
supply was not provided even after repeated representation to several top levels government officials for more than 15
years. At the time of election all the contesting candidates promised basic facilities will be provided. But nothing
happened subsequently.
After series of meetings residents decided to meet the chief minister at the Secretariat. Police asked the residents to
select 25 representatives to go to the Secretariat on May 29, 2005. However, on Monday 31, 2005, two thousand
residents in 13 lorries headed for Fort St George. The Police intercepted them near SRP Tools but they forced their way
through. Trouble started when the Police stopped the residents from Kallukutai. According to Mr Kumaresan a youth,
in the beginning, along with residents, four Tata Sumos packed with Mr KP Kandan’s people (town panchayat president)
came in the form of help to supply water. “We did not realise who these people were that is why we did not note
down the Tata Sumos numbers”. Trouble started when the police stopped the residents. Police asked the residents to
disperse and told them that only their leaders could go and register the Complaint at the Secretariat. Immediately the
persons in Tata Sumos threw stones on the Police and started pelting stone all around. Immediately Police used their
lathis and fired tear gas shells to the innocent residents. Armed Reserve Police lathi-charged and fired tear gas shells.
According to one Mr Suresh, the persons in the Tata Sumos came prepared to create law and order problem. There
were no women police persons. The men police lathi charged women some dozen buses were smashed and over 50
persons injured. Fifteen residents were admitted to the government Royapettah Hospital. The protesters, numbering
two thousand, including several women, squatted on the road when not allowed to proceed beyond the junction. The
Swift Action Group and policemen with shields led the charge. The entire area was strewn with stones, glass pieces and
sundry missiles.
Recommendations
It should be the responsibility of the State to protect the poor people. Use of the force is unacceptable in a
democratic State.
The Committee protests against the police lathicharge on the innocent people including women and children.
Initiate dialogue with the local leaders for the improvement of civic amenities.
Free treatment and compensation to the injured.
Immediate provision of civic amenities like water supply, electricity, road, drainage facility, garbage collection,
school and ICDS centre to Kallukuttai.
Action against the officers who ordered the lathi-charge.
197
There are no bus facilities to go for fishing. They have to travel by share auto, which they are unable to afford. Every
day, each individual spend Rs. 20 to go to the sea by share auto. The other important problem is that of toilet
facilities. Water stagnated around the main drainage line for months. The stagnant water and the surroundings with
no sanitation and hygiene facilities create the perfect breeding ground for mosquitoes. Many children contract fever.
Since there is no drainage system sewage water is not sucked by the land. During rains, life in this area become
miserable. The stagnant water is breeding ground for flies and mosquitoes. Flies swamp the entire area. The temporary
non-Formal education centres are run by NGOs namely Karunalaya, Don Bosco Anbu Illam, Mass Action Net
Work and World Vision. These NGOs are project-based and do not address the basic issues like housing and the
livelihood. Tsunami affected people are still struggling for their employment.
Background: A series of blazes that have engulfed the area for the past 10 days.
First fire: On June 15, 2005, fire broke out in a cluster of 500 government-built shelters in Blocks G and H. The fire
reportedly started at 11.20 pm and within an hour became a big blaze.
Second fire: On June 17, 2005 about 60 houses burnt down in Ragavan Street, old Kargil Nagar.
Third fire: A fire broke out in the Kargil Nagar shelters in the early hours of June 22, 2005 morning around 1.15
am. Blocks A to F of the resettlement colony were completely destroyed and around 1662 families rendered
homeless.Two days prior to fire, the residents of Block A and F had received a warning that their house would be
the next target.
The fire spread too fast amongst the tar-coated sheds. The thick fumes emerging from the blaze further affected the
health of the people.The fire vehicle was not in the area on June 21, 2005. All the 2360 shelters constructed for the
victims were completely destroyed by the fire. A 22-year-old youth was also charred to death while he was trying to
pull out his belongings from his hut. People lost household items such as clothes, utensils, blankets and
valuables including jewellery. The government gave Rs 2000, five kilos of rice and one saree and one dhoti to all the
families affected by the fire. As per residents’ views, the government was going to provide temporary shelters near
Ennore Thermal Power station within two weeks. But the residents did not know where the exact location was.
Facts
The location is unsuitable for even temporary dwellings.
Basic amenities like toilet, transport, crèche facilities are missing.
There is inordinate delay in the decision making process in respect of permanent housing.
Fire service vehicles not stationed in Kargil Nagar temporary shelters.
Layout of the temporary shelter makes it vulnerable, as the low-lying area is not readily accessible to heavy
vehicles such as fire tenders and water trucks.
Materials used in construction were in poor quality including tar sheets.
Kargil Nagar fires are deliberate, not accidents. Miscreants have been using spontaneously flammable chemicals
as rather difficult to extinguish chemical originated fire.
Recommendations
The government should probe the fire incidents and take severe action against the culprits.
Better living conditions i.e. regular protected water supply, toilet facilities, transport facilities, school and crèche
facilities should be provided.
The government should provide immediate relief in the form of food supplies and household utensils to the
affected families.
The families in temporary shelter should be given education about fire safety.
In Kargil Nagar, a fire tender should be stationed at the site to attend to emergency calls.
It is the government’s responsibility to provide adequate housing to the affected people. It is also entitlement of
the people to get adequate housing as per constitutional provisions and international covenant. Moving the
entire temporary shelter to safer localities can prevent further disasters. The local residents preferred they could
be shifted to Madras Port Trust quarters. Now the Government is intending to demolish the quarters. Another
alternative site is they can be shift to the TNSCB land near the WIMCO in Neithal Nagar.
Temporary shelters for 2300 families will pose social and community problem. Instead, they should have 500
houses for the rehabilitation.
Suitable alternate land (the MPT land in Tondiarpet) must be chosen so that fisher- other unorganised labour
livelihoods are not lost.
Immediate provision of Tsunami relief materials like 30 kg of rice and kerosene must be give to the people.
To July 5, 2005
The Corporator
Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Sub: Stand up for your rights as elected local representatives. Stand up for the spirit of the 74th amendment
Dear Sir,
As you are probably aware, the CHATRI is a campaign organisation working to build awareness among and
protect the housing rights of the urban and rural poor. This organisation grew out of a number of associations and
collaborations forged in the wake of the Nandanavanam project proposed in 1997, which threatened to dislocate
thousands of poor families along the Mussi River. These associations at that time worked from two common
platforms called Nandanavanam Bastee Parirakshana Samiti and Mussi Bachao Andolan (Save Mussi Campaign). It
included individuals and organisations advancing the concerns of environment, downstream farmers, slumdwellers
and human rights. CHATRI made several constructive suggestions including developing an alternative road alignment
plan at our own cost to minimise evictions.
The Nandanavanam project appeared to have been shelved by the previous government after the massive floods in
the year 2000 that inundated one-third of the Hyderabad city. However, recent reports in the media quoting officials
and briefings by representatives of NGOs suggest that the project is being revived under a new name The Save
Mussi Campaign.
The sparse details of the Save Mussi Campaign that are available to us indicate the following: The Save Mussi Campaign
is estimated to cost Rs 900 crore. The project has been completed in 30 months. The one major difference between the
old Nandanavanam project and the new Save Mussi Campaign in terms of works is that it now includes the nearly 11
km stretch from Tipu Khan Bridge to Chaderghat bridge. The 18 km length of the river in the city has been divided
into three areas broadly known as Ecological Precinct, Heritage Precinct and Metropolitan Precinct.
While it is clear that the government does not have the resources to make any major financial commitments, we also
understand that the government is planning to create a special development authority to alter the zoning and building
regulations especially in the metropolitan precinct. Further we understand that the government aims to create a
Mussi River Development Corporation, which will have ownership of the project. Going by the experience of a
similar project in Gujarat, the Sabarmati Riverfront Development Project, we surmise that the government will
either acquire and transfer land to the corporation or empower the corporation to reclaim land from the riverbed.
At this stage we have a number of reservations regarding the manner in which the government is proceeding on
the project.
1. First, it is beyond our comprehension why the MCH Commissioner chose to organise a workshop on saving
the Mussi without inviting any of the organisations which have been not only intimately involved in advocating
the concerns of slum dwellers along the river ever since the project was first conceptualised in 1997 but also
took the trouble to develop alternative road alignment plans etc to minimise the damage. Further, it is puzzling
that the government should have chosen to announce the launching of the project itself on June 1 and then
called for public suggestions. How can people’s suggestions make any impact retrospectively? We, therefore,
demand that the government involve The CHATRI and other similar organisations in all future consultations.
2. Secondly, it is three years since the draft Master Plan 2020 was put up for public inputs. Our organisation at that
time made several suggestions to be incorporated into the Master Plan to protect the interests of the low
199
income groups who have as much right to live in the city as the rich. We are yet to know the fate of these
suggestions. We demand that the government should do its legal duty with respect to the Master Plan before
making any changes to it.
3. Thirdly, we understand that there is a case pending in the High Court challenging the creation of special
development authorities in the municipal limits of Hyderabad especially in relation to the Budha Purnima
Project. Such special authorities, which are not answerable to the Municipal bodies can only be understood to
be a deliberate attempt to undermine the spirit of the 74th amendment. We demand that the elected local
representatives in the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad assert their right to decision making on local town
planning.
4. Fourthly, we believe that the practice of turning land into equity for corporations is a highly objectionable one.
It is the constitutional duty of the government to protect the poor from the ravages of the free market. Here,
in the proposed Save Mussi Project which appears to be substantively the same as Nandanavanam project, the
government appears to be deliberately edging out the poor who have laboured for decades to turn the most
worthless lands in the city into living and working places with the intention of handing over the same lands to
a few for pleasure and profiteering. We demand that the government abandon such projects.
As elected representatives of the people it is your responsibility to protect the most vulnerable groups in your wards. As
you are all aware, Hyderabad city has historically been known to be the destination for the poor seeking livelihoods.
However, in recent years, with growing poverty in the rural areas, the number of poor people coming to the city has
increased tremendously. At the same time, the city is increasingly turning hostile to the poor, driving them out of all the
central locations where the poor can find livelihoods. There is a need to arrest this trend. As corporators you should
stand up for your own rights against the assembly and the bureaucrats who seem to be controlling the city in every way
and making it possible only for the very rich to live here. We urge you to act responsibly before it is too late.
Thanking you,
Yours Sincerely
200 Eviction
Campaign for Housing andWatch India
Tenurial - II
Rights
Annexure - IX
201
(ii) the provision of land for town or rural planning; the guardians of minors and the committees or
managers of lunatics or idiots shall be deemed
(iii) the provision of land for planned development
respectively the persons so entitled to act, to the same
of land from public funds in pursuance of any
extent as the minors, lunatics or idiots themselves, if
scheme or policy of government and subsequent
free from disability, could have acted:
disposal thereof in whole or in part by lease,
assignment or outright sale with the object of securing Provided that –
further development as planned; (i) no person shall be deemed “entitled to act” whose
interest in the subject matter shall be shown to the
(iv) the provision of land for a corporation owned
or controlled by the State; satisfaction of the collector or court to be adverse
to the interest of the person interested for whom he
(v) the provision of land for residential purposes to would otherwise be entitled to act;
the poor or landless or to persons residing in areas
affected by natural calamities, or to persons displaced (ii) in every such case the person interested may appear
or affected by reason of the implementation of any by a next friend or, in default of his appearance by a
scheme undertaken by government, any local authority next friend, the collector or court, as the case may
or a corporation owned or controlled by the State; be, shall appoint a guardian for the case to act on his
behalf in the conduct thereof;
(vi) the provision of land for carrying out any
educational, housing, health or slum clearance scheme (iii) the provisions of [Order XXXII of the First Schedule
sponsored by government or by any authority to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908)
established by government for carrying out any such shall, mutatis mutandis, apply in the case of persons
scheme, or with the prior approval of the appropriate interested appearing before a collector or court by a
government, by a local authority, or a society registered next friend, or by a guardian for the case, in
proceedings under this Act; and
under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860),
or under any corresponding law for the time being in (iv) no person “entitled to act” shall be competent to
force in a state, or a co-operative society within the receive the compensation money payable to the person
meaning of any law relating to co-operative societies for whom he is entitled to act, unless he would have
for the time being in force in any State; been competent to alienate the land and receive and
(vii) the provision of land for any other scheme of give a good discharge for the purchase money on a
development sponsored by Government or with the voluntary sale.
prior approval of the appropriate government, by a Part II: Acquisition
local authority; Preliminary investigation
4. Publication of preliminary notification and power of
(viii) the provision of any premises or building for
officers thereupon. -
locating a public office, but does not include
acquisition of land for companies;] (1) Whenever it appears to the [appropriate government]
the land in any locality [is needed or] is likely to be
(g) the following persons shall be deemed person needed for any public purpose [or for a company], a
“entitled to act” as and to the extent hereinafter notification to that effect shall be published in the
provided (that is to say) - official gazette [and in two daily newspapers circulating
in that locality of which at least one shall be in the
trustees for other persons beneficially interested shall
regional language], and the collector shall cause public
be deemed the person entitled to act with reference
notice of the substance of such notification to be given
to any such case, and that to the same extent as the at convenient places in the said locality [(the last of the
person beneficially interested could have acted if free dates of such publication and the giving of such public
from disability. notice , being hereinafter referred to as the date of the
a married woman, in cases to which the English law publication of the notification)].
is applicable, shall be deemed the persons, so entitled (2) Thereupon it shall be lawful for any officer, either
to act, and whether of full age or not, to the same generally or specially authorised by such government
extent as if she were unmarried and of full age; and in this behalf, and for his servants and workman, -
(a) The costs of such investments as aforesaid; (2) The collector shall thereupon give notice in writing
to the person interested in such land of the purpose
(b) The costs of the orders for the payment of the for which the same is needed, and shall, for the
interest or other proceeds of the securities upon occupation and use thereof for such term as
which such moneys are for the time being invested, aforesaid, and for the materials (if any) to be taken
and for the payment out of court of the principal there from, pay to them such compensation, either
of such moneys, and of all proceedings relating in a gross sum of money, or by monthly or other
thereto, except such as may be occasioned by periodical payments, as shall be agreed upon in
litigation between adverse claimants. writing between him and such persons respectively.
33. Investment of money deposited in other cases. - (3) In case the collector and the persons interested
differ as to the sufficiency of the compensation or
When any money shall have been deposited in court
apportionment thereof, the collector shall refer such
under this Act for any cause other than mentioned
difference to the decision of the court.
in the last proceeding section, the court may, on the
application of any party interested or claiming an 36. Power to enter and take possession and compensation
interest in such money, order the same to be invested on restoration. - (1) On payment of such
Provided also that, if any question shall arise as to [51A. Acceptance of certified copy as evidence. - In
whether any land proposed to be taken under this any proceeding under this Act, a certified copy of a
Act does or does not form part of a house, document registered under the Regulation Act, 1908
manufactory or building within the meaning of this (16 of 1908), including a copy given under section
section, the Collector shall refer the determination 57 of that Act, may be accepted as evidence of the
of such question to the Court and shall not be take transaction recorded in such document].
possession of such land until after the question has 52. Notice in case of suits for anything done in pursuance
been determined. of Act. - No suit or other proceeding shall be
In deciding on such a reference the Court shall have commenced or prosecuted against any person for
regard to the question whether the land proposed to anything done in pursuance of this Act, without
be taken, is reasonably require for the full and giving to such person a month’s previous notice in
unimpaired use of the house, manufactory or building. writing of the intended proceeding, and of the cause
thereof, nor after tender of sufficient amends.
(2) If, in the case of any claim under section 23, sub-
section (1), thirdly, by a person interested, on account 53. Code of Civil Procedure to apply to proceedings
of the severing of the land to be acquired from his before Court - Save in so far as they may be
other land, the [appropriate Government] is of inconsistent with anything contained in this Act, the
opinion that the claim is unreasonable or excessive, provisions of the [Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
it may, at any time before the Collector has made (5 of 1908)], shall apply to all proceedings before
his award, order the acquisition of the whole of the the Court under this Act.
land of which the land first sought to be acquired
[54. Appeals in proceedings before court. - Subject to the
forms a part.
provisions of the code of civil procedure, 1908 (5
(3) In the case last hereinbefore provided for, no of 1908), applicable to appeals from original decrees,
fresh declaration or other proceedings under sections and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any
6 to 10, both inclusive, shall be necessary; but the enactment for the time being in force, an appeal shall
Collector shall without delay furnish a copy of the only lie in any proceedings under this Act to the High
order of the [appropriate Government] to the Court from the award, or from any part of the award,
(g) any other matter which has to be, or may be, 5. Where the land or any portion thereof has been
prescribed. unoccupied or the owner has not been in receipt of
any rent for the occupation of the land during the
[(3) Every rule made under this section shall be whole or any part of the said period of five years,
laid as soon as may be after it is made before the gross rent shall be taken to be the income which
each House of Parliament while it is in session the owner would in fact have derived if the land has
for a total period of thirty days which may be been leased out for rent during the said period, and
comprised in one session or [in two or more for this purpose the rent actually derived from the
successive sessions and if before the expiry of land during a period prior or subsequent to the period
the session immediately following the session, during which it remained vacant or from similar land
or the successive sessions aforesaid] both Houses in the vicinity shall be taken into account.
agree in making any modification in the rule or
both Houses agree that the rule should not be 1. Substituted for “(e) “work of improvement”
made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in includes in relation to any building in a slum area
such modified form or be of no effect, as the the execution of any one or more of the
case may be; so however that any such following works, namely:
modification or annulment shall be without I. necessary repairs;
prejudice to the validity of anything previously
done under that rule.] II. structural alterations;
III. provision of light points and water taps;
The schedule
(See section 15) IV. construction of drains, open or covered;
Principles for determination of the net average monthly V. provision of latrines
income VI. provision of additional or improved fixtures or
1. The competent authority shall first determine the gross fittings;
rent actually derived by the owner of the land VII.opening up or paving of court yards;
acquired including any building on such land during
VIII. removal of rubbish; and
the period of five consecutive years referred to in
sub-section (1) of section 15. IX. any other work including the demolition of any
building or any part thereof which in the opinion
2. For such determination the competent authority may of the competent authority is necessary for
hold any local inquiry and obtain, if necessary, certified executing any of the works specified above;
copies of extracts from the property tax assessment
books of the municipal or other local authority (f) “occupier” includes an owner in occupation of
concerned showing the rental value of such land. or otherwise using his own land or building;”
by the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance)
3. The net average monthly income referred to in sub- Act, 1964, w.e.f. 27-02-1975.
section (1) of section 15 shall be sixty percent of the
average monthly gross rent which shall be one sixtieth 2. Inserted by the Slum Area (Improvement and
of the gross rent during the five consecutive years as Clearance) Act, 1964, w.e.f. 27-02-1975.
determined by the competent authority under
3. Inserted by the Slum Area (Improvement and
paragraph 1.
Clearance) Act, 1964, w.e.f. 27-02-1975.
4. Forty percent of the gross monthly rental referred
4. Inserted by the Slum Area (Improvement and
to above shall not be taken into consideration in
Clearance) Act, 1964, w.e.f. 27-02-1975.
determining the net average monthly income but shall
be deducted in lieu of the expenditure which the 5. Inserted by the Slum Area (Improvement and
owner of the land would normally incur for payment Clearance) Act, 1964, w.e.f. 27-02-1975.
231
norms. The ULBs may also consider prescribing a be designated as nodal agencies for initiating the process
certain period of time (two or three years) for of resolution of disputes. It will be obligatory for
providing basic services under any slum development ministries at the state and central level to participate in
Programmes after which, the area should be these negotiations. The Ministry of urban affairs and
reviewed for de-listing. employment will play a pro-active role in resolving
disputes on such lands owned by Union Ministries so
4. Classification of land status/tenability
that all basic services, development and resettlement
The land status of all listed slums/informal
and rehabilitation (R& R) activities can be negotiated
settlements should be classified by the ULB as either
more effectively. The MUAE may be empowered to
tenable or untenable in order to determine whether
act as an arbitrator between the central government
or not regular planned service provision will be
and local bodies concerning disputes over such lands
undertaken on an in-situ or re-settlement basis. All
(owned by union government.)
listed slums/informal settlements should be
considered as tenable unless the site falls strictly within b) Tenure on privately owned lands
the definition of untenability as expressed below: i) Land acquisition: All tenable settlements on
private land should be acquired unless the ULB
a) Definition of untenable slums/informal
decides to pass a resolution otherwise. All states
settlements: A site shall not be declared as untenable
should mak immediate provision to streamline
unless existence of human habitation on such sites
and simplify the procedure to ensure the speedy
entails undue risks to the safety or health or life of
acquisition of land for slums on private land
the residents themselves or where habitation on such
categorised as tenable. The land acquisition
sites is considered contrary to “ public interest”.
process should be completed within a maximum
The issue of whether a settlement’s existence is against period of six calendar months from the time
public interest shall be decided by the district of initiating the process.
magistrate in consultation with the ULB and technical
ii) Negotiated compensation: The acquisition of
experts, after giving full opportunity to the resident land from private Parties should be undertaken
community to express their views, in a public hearing. on a negotiated basis. All the stakeholders
The process of consultation and public hearing shall (residents, urban local bodies, public agencies,
be completed within three calendar months from others) may be invited to participate in the
the date of their initiation. negotiation to promote transparency and equity.
b) Definition of tenable slums/informal Funds earmarked from a tax/cess on vacant
settlements: All listed settlements that do not fall strictly lands should be drawn from the urban poverty
within the category identified above under untanable eradication and shelter fund (see para 12 c) to
situations shall be considered ‘tenable’, and thus provide compensation for acquiring private
eligible for in-situ upgrading ( subject to the settlement lands on which the slum settlements exist.
of ownership disputes on private land). monitored and supervised by the ULB with
community representatives. (Also see section 16
Granting of tenure on monitoring and evaluation).
a) Tenure on government owned land: Tenure
shall be granted to all residents on Translating these principles into action envisages:
Full, accurate and detailed baseline inventories of all
tenable sites owned or acquired by government. Full assets including livelihoods
property rights shall be granted on resettlement and/ Community mobilisation
or rehabilitation sites. Tenure shall be allotted in the Timing of the interventions to reduce dislocation
joint names of the head of household shall not be and discomfort especially during periods of inclement
precluded from having full tenure rights. Other forms weather
of tenure may also be considered, if desired by the Communication at all levels to ensure transparency
community. This may include: group tenure, collective Mobilising support of the local media to assist the process
tenure, co-operative tenure, etc. Co-ordination of multiple ministries and convergence
Conflict Resolution: On lands occupied by slums/ of various Programmes
informal settlements and owned by central, state and Participation of the host community at all stages of
local government bodies, municipal authorities are to the process
Statement of objects and reasons (ii) acquisition of the excess vacant land by the state
There has been a demand for imposing a ceiling on urban government with powers to dispose of the vacant
property also, especially after the imposition of a ceiling on land to subserve the common good;
agricultural lands by the state governments. With the growth
of population and increasing urbanisation, a need for orderly (iii) payment of an amount for the acquisition of the
development of urban areas has also been felt. It is, therefore, excess vacant land, in cash and in bonds;
considered necessary to take measures for exercising social (iv) granting exemptions in respect of certain specific
control over the scarce resource of urban land with a view categories of vacant land;
to ensuring its equitable distribution amongst the various
sections of society and also avoiding speculative (v) regulating the transfer of vacant land within the
transactions relating to land in urban agglomerations. ceiling limit;
With a view to ensuring uniformity in approach (vi) regulating the transfer of urban or urbanisable land
Government of India addressed the state governments with any building (whether constructed before or
in this regard; eleven states have so far passed resolutions after the commencement of the proposed
under Article 252(1) of the Constitution empowering legislation) for a period of 10 years from the
Parliament to undertake legislation in this behalf. The commencement of the legislation or the
present proposal is to enact a parliamentary legislation in construction of the building, whichever is later;
pursuance of these resolutions.
(vii) restricting the plinth area for construction of future
The Bill is intended to achieve the following residential buildings: and
objectives:
(i) to prevent concentration of urban property in the (viii) other procedural and miscellaneous matters.
hands of a few persons and speculation and Preamble
profiteerings therein; An Act to provide for the imposition of a ceiling on
(ii) to bring about socialisation of urban land in urban vacant land in urban agglomerations, for the acquisition
agglomerations to subserve the common good by of such land in excess of the ceiling limit, to regulate the
ensuring its equitable distribution; construction of buildings on such land and for matters
connected therewith, with a view to preventing he
(iii) to discourage construction of luxury housing
concentration of urban land in the hands of a few persons
leading to conspicuous consumption of scarce and speculation and profiteering therein and with a view
building materials and to ensure the equitable to bringing about an equitable distribution of land in
utilisation of such materials; and urban agglomerations to subserve the common good.
(iv) to secure orderly urbanisation.
WHEREAS it is expedient to provide for the imposition
The Bill mainly provides for the following: of a ceiling on vacant land in urban agglomerations, for
(i) imposition of ceiling on both ownership and the acquisition of such land in excess of the ceiling limit, to
possession of vacant land in urban agglomerations, regulate the construction of buildings on such land and
the ceiling being on a graded basis according to the for matters connected therewith, with a view to preventing
classification of the urban agglomeration; the concentration of urban land in the hands of a few
(i) land on which construction of a building is not (2) Where any person holds vacant land situated in two
permissible under the building regulations in or more categories of urban agglomeration
force in the area in which such land is situated; specified in Schedule I, then, for the purpose of
calculating the extent of vacant land held by him—
(ii) in an area where there are building regulations,
the land occupied by any building who has been (a) one square metre of vacant land situated in
constructed before, or is being constructed on, an urban agglomeration falling within
the appointed day with approval of the category A shall be deemed to be equal to
appropriate authority and the land appurtenant two square metres of vacant land situated
to such building; and in an urban agglomeration falling within
category B, three square metres of vacant
(iii) in an area where here are no building regulations, land situated in an urban agglomeration
the land occupied by any building which has been falling within category C and four square
(sic) before, or is being constructed on, the metres of vacant land situated in an urban
appointed day and the land appurtenant to such agglomeration falling within category D;
building:
(b) one square metre of vacant land situated in
Provided that where any person ordinarily keeps his
an urban agglomeration falling within
cattle, other than for the purpose of dairy farming or
category B shall be deemed to be equal to
for the purpose at of breeding of live-stock, on any
land situated in a village within an urban agglomeration one and one-half square metres of vacant
(described as a village in the revenue records), then, so land situated in an urban agglomeration
much extent of the land as has been ordinarily used falling within categoy C and two square
for the keeping of such cattle immediately before the metres of vacant land situated in an urban
appointed day shall not be deemed to be vacant land agglomeration falling within category D; and
for the purposes of this clause. (c) one square metre of vacant land situated in
Chapter III: Ceiling on vacant land an urban agglomeration falling within
3. Persons not entitled to hold vacant land in category C shall be deemed to be equal to
excess of the ceiling limit one and one-third square metres of vacant
Except as otherwise provided in this Act, on and land situated in an urban agglomeration
from the commencement of this Act, no person falling within category D.
shall be entitled to hold any vacant land in excess of
the ceiling limit in the territories to which this Act (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-
applies under sub-section (2) of section 1. section (1), where in respect of any vacant land
any scheme for group housing has been
4. Ceiling limit sanctioned by an authority competent in this
(1) Subject to the other provisions of this section, in behalf immediately before the commencement
the case of every person, the ceiling limit shall be— of this Act, then, the person holding such vacant
(i) “group housing” means a building constructed (6) Where a person is a beneficiary of a private trust and
or to be constructed with one or more floors, his share in the income from such trust is known or
each floor consisting of one or more dwelling determinable, the share of such person in the vacant
units and having common service facilities; land and in any other land on which there is a building
with a dwelling unit therein, held by the trust, shall be
(ii) “common service facility” includes facility like deemed to be in the same proportion as his share in
staircase, balcony and varandah.
the total income of such trust bears to such total
(4) (a) In any state to which this Act applies in the income and the extent of such land apportionable to
first instance, if, on or after the 17th day of his share shall also be taken into account in calculating
February 1975, but before the appointed day, the extent of vacant land held by such person.
any person has made any transfer by way of
(7) Where a person is a member of a Hindu undivided
sale mortgage, gift, lease to otherwise (other than
family, so much of the vacant land and of any other
a bona fide sale under a registered deed for
land on which there is a building with a dwelling unit
valuable consideration) of any vacant land held
therein, as would have fallen to his share had the
by him and situated in such state to any other
entire vacant land and such other land held by the
person, whether or not for consideration, then,
Hindu undivided family been partitioned amongst
for the purposes of calculating the extent of
its members at the commencement of this Act shall
vacant land held by such person the land so
also be taken into account in calculating the extent
transferred shall be taken into account, without
of vacant land held by such person.
prejudice to the rights or interests of the
transferee in the land so transferred: (8) Where a person, being a member of a housing co-
operative society registered or deemed registered under
Provided that the excess vacant land to be
any law for the time being in force, holds vacant land
surrendered by such person under this chapter shall
allotted to him by such society, then, the extent of land
be selected only out of the vacant land held by him
so held shall also be taken into account in calculating the
after such transfer.
extent of vacant land held by such person.
(b) For the purpose of clause (a) the burden of
(9) Where a person holds vacant land and also holds
proving any sale to be a bona fide one shall be
any other land on which there is a building with a
on the transferee.
dwelling unit therein the extent of such other land
Explanation: Where in any state aforesaid, there occupied by the building and the land appurtenant
was or is in force any law prohibiting transfer of thereto shall also be taken into account in calculating
urban property in that state except under the the extent of vacant land held by such person.
(2) On receipt of an application under sub-section (1), Provided that where the competent authority exercises
the state government shall, after making such inquiry within the period aforesaid the option to purchase
as it deems fit, assign such land to such person on such land the execution of the sale deed shall be
payment of an amount equal to the amount which completed and the payment of the purchase price
has been paid by the state government for the thereof shall be made within a period of three months
acquisition of the extent of land to be assigned. from the date on which such option is exercised.
1. For such modification, see Mah. Govt Gaz, 5-8-1976. (3) For the purpose of calculating the price of any vacant
Pt IV-A p 507 land under sub-section (2), it shall be deemed that a
notification under sub-section (1) of section 4 of
Chapter IV: Regulation of transfer and use of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or under the relevant
urban property provision of any other corresponding law for the
25. Definition: time being in force, had been issued for the acquisition
In this Chapter, “plinth area”, in relation to— of such vacant land on the date on which the notice
(i) a dwelling unit in a building consisting of only was given under sub-section (1) of this section.
one floor, means the area of the dwelling unit at
27. Prohibition on transfer of urban property
the floor level and includes the thickness of the
outer walls thereof; (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law
for the time being in force, but subject to the
(ii) a dwelling unit in a building consisting of two provisions of sub-section (3) of section 5 and sub-
or more floors, means the area of the dwelling -section (4) of section 10, no person shall transfer by
unit at the floor level where the dwelling unit is way of sale, mortgage, gift, lease for a period
proposed to be situated and includes the thickness exceeding ten years, or otherwise, any urban or
of the outer walls thereof and the proportionate
urbanisable land with a building (whether constructed
area intended for any common service facility at
the floor level aforesaid. before or after the commencement of this Act) or a
portion only of such building for a period of ten
Explanation: For the purposes of this clause, years of such commencement or from the date on
“common service facility” shall have the same which the building is constructed, whichever is later
meaning as in sub-clause (ii) of the Explanation below except with the previous permission in writing of
sub-section (3) of section 4. the competent authority.
(4) If any person contravenes any of the provisions of 42. Act to override other laws
this Act for which no penalty has been expressly The provisions of this Act shall have effect
provided for, he shall be punishable with notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith in any
imprisonment for a term which may extend to two other law for the time being in force or any custom,
years or with fine which may extend to one thousand usage or agreement or decree or order of a court,
tribunal or other authority.
rupees or with both.
43. Court-fees
39. Offences by companies
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Court-
(1) Where an offence under this Act has been committed fees Act, 1870, every application, appeal or other
by a company every person who, at the time the offence proceeding under this Act shall bear a court-fee stamp
was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible of such value as may prescribed.
to the company for the conduct of the business of the
company as well as the company, shall be deemed to 44. Certain officers to be public servants
be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be Every officer acting under, or in pursuance of, the
proceeded against and punished accordingly: provisions of this Act or under the rules made
thereunder shall be deemed to be a public servant within
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section the meaning of Sec. 21 of the Indian Penal Code.
shall render any such person liable to any punishment
if he proves that the offence was committed without 45. Correction of clerical errors
his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence Clerical or arithmetical mistakes in any order passed by
to prevent the commission of such offence. any officer or authority under this Act or errors arising
therein from any accidental slip or omission may at any
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section time be corrected by such officer or authority either on
(1), where an offence under this Act has been his or its own motion or on an application received in
committed by a company and it is proved that the this behalf from any of the Parties.
offence has been committed with the consent or
connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on 46. Power to make rules
the part of, any director, manager, secretary, or other (1) The central government may, by notification in
officer of the company, such director, manager, the official gazette, make rules1 for carrying out
secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be the provisions of this Act.
guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be (2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality
proceeded against and punished accordingly. of the foregoing power, such rules may provide
Explanation: For the purposes of this section.— for all or any of the following matters, namely:
(a) the cultivation or growing of plant which
(a) “company” means any body corporate and includes
will not be agriculture under clause (A) of
a firm or other association of individuals; and
the Explanation to clause (o) of section 2;
(b) “director”, in relation to a firm means a partner (b) the period within which the statement may
in the firm. be filed under section 6;
40. Indemnity (c) the form of intimation under sub-sections
No suit or other legal proceeding shall lie against the (2) and (3) of section 7;
government or any officer of government in respect (d) the particulars to be mentioned in the
of anything, which is in good faith done or intended statement referred to in sub-section (1) of
to be done by or under this Act. section 6, sub-section (2) of Section 8, sub-
41. Cognisance of offences section (1) of section 15 and sub-section (1)
No Court shall take cognisance of any offence of section 16;
punishable under this Act except on complaint in (e) the manner of serving the draft statement
writing made by the competent authority or any under sub-section (3) of section 8;
Preamble
An Act to repeal the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.
BE it enacted by Parliament in the fiftieth year of the Republic of India as follows:
1. Short title, application and commencement
(1) This Act may be called the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999.
(2) It applies in the first instance to the whole of the States of Haryana and Punjab and to all the union territories;
and it shall apply to such other state which adopts this Act by resolution passed in that behalf under clause (2)
of Article 252 of the Constitution.
(3) It shall be deemed to have come into force in the states of Haryana and Punjab and in all the union territories
on the 11th day of January, 1999 and in any other state which adopts this Act under clause (2) of Article 252
of the Constitution on the date of such adoption; and the reference to repeal of the Urban Land (Ceiling and
Regulation) Act, 1976 shall, in relation to any state or union territory, mean the date on which this Act comes
into force in such state or union territory.
2. Repeal of Act 33 of 1976
The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act) is hereby repealed.
3. Savings
(1) The repeal of the principal Act shall not affect -
(a) the vesting of any vacant land under sub-section (3) of section 10, possession of which has been taken over by
the state government or any person duly authorised by the state government in this behalf or by the competent
authority;
(b) the validity of any order granting exemption under sub-section (1) of section 20 or any action taken thereunder,
notwithstanding any judgment of any court to the contrary;
(c) any payment made to the state government as a condition for granting exemption under sub-section (1) of
section 20.
(2) Where -
(a) any land is deemed to have vested in the state government under sub-section (3) of section 10 of the principal
Act but possession of which has not been taken over by the state government or any person duly authorised by
the state government in this behalf or by the competent authority; and
(b) any amount has been paid by the state government with respect to such land, then, such land shall not be
restored unless the amount paid, if any, has been refunded to the state government.
4. Abatement of legal proceedings
All proceedings relating to any order made or purported to be made under the principal Act pending immediately
before the commencement of this Act, before any court, tribunal or other authority shall abate:
Provided that this section shall not apply to the proceedings relating to sections 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the principal
Act in so far as such proceedings are relatable to the land, possession of which has been taken over by the state
government or any person duly authorised by the state government in this behalf or by the competent authority.
5. Repeal and saving
(1) The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Ordinance, 1999 (Ord. 5 of 1999) is hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under the said Ordinance shall be deemed to
have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this Act.
266 Eviction Watch India - II
Annexure XIV
Section 5: Penalty
5(1) Any person who - (i) wrongfully dispossesses or attempts to dispossess an occupier of a dwelling house; or
(ii) recovers or attempts to recover rent in any manner from an occupier of a dwelling house-shall be punished
with rigorous imprisonment which shall not be less than three months....
267
Annexure -XV
275
4.7 Infrastructure development and maintenance empowerment and labour, etc.), but will also be
in the slums: State governments should ensure a monitored by the ministry of urban employment
separate provision for upkeep and maintenance of and poverty alleviation in so far as urban poor are
the public assets created under the scheme. concerned.
4.8 Beneficiary contribution: Housing should not 4.10 The scheme may be converged with other state
be provided free to the beneficiaries by the state sectoral and departmental Programmes relating to
government. A minimum of 12 percent beneficiary achieving social sector goals similar to those envisaged
contribution should be stipulated, which in the case in this scheme.
of SC/ST/BC/OBC/PH and other weaker sections 5. Financing pattern
shall be 10 percent. 5.1 The sharing of funds would be in the ratio of
80:20 between the central government and state
4.9 Admissible components
government/ULB/ parastatal. States/implementing
i) Provision of shelter including upgradation and
agencies may raise their contribution from their own
construction of new houses.
resources or from beneficiary contribution/ financial
ii) Provision of community toilets. institutions.
iii) Provision of physical amenities like water supply, 5.2 For special category states, the funding pattern
storm water drains, community bath, widening between Centre and the states will be in the ratio of
and paving of existing lanes, sewers, community 90:10.
latrines, street lights, etc.
5.3 Funds from the MPLAD/MLALAD could be
iv) Community infrastructure like provision of canalised towards project cost and to that extent state
community centres to be used for pre-school share could be suitably reduced. However, the
education, non-formal education, adult MPLAD/MLALAD fund would not substitute
education, recreational activities, etc. beneficiary contribution.
v) Community primary health care centre buildings 5.4 The scheme will be implemented through a
can be provided. designated state level nodal agency.
vi) Social amenities like pre-school education, non- 5.5 In case externally aided project (EXP) funds are
formal education, adult education, maternity, available, these can be passed through as ACA to the
child health and primary health care including state government as funds contributed by the state/
immunisation, etc. ULBs/FIs.
vii) Provision of model demonstration projects. 6. Release of central assistance
viii) Sites and services/houses at affordable costs for 6.1. Central assistance (grant) released will go directly
the EWS and LIG categories. to the nodal agencies identified by the state
ix) Slum improvement and rehabilitation projects. government as additional central assistance.
x) Land acquisition cost will not be financed except 6.2 Release of the central share to nodal agency will
for acquisition of private land for schemes/ depend on availability of state share and submission
projects in the northeastern states and hilly states, of utilisation certificates in accordance with the
viz., Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal and Jammu provisions of general financial rules (GFRs).
and Kashmir. 6.3 The criteria for release of funds are as under: State
share has to be deposited in a separate account to
Note: The DPRs will have to be prepared by the
become eligible for the central grant. Fifty percent of
implementing agencies for funding under the IHSDP
including specific project components, viz, health, the central grant will be released to the state nodal agency
education and social security. However, the schemes after verification of the state share, and on signing the
of health, education and social security will be funded tripartite memorandum of agreement. Second
through convergence of schemes and dovetailing of installment will be released based on the progress.
budgetary provisions available under the 7. Incentives
Programmes of the respective sectors (health, human 7.1 After due assessment of status of implementation
resource development, social justice and of activities for which incentives are sought,
T
he Valmiki Ambedkar Awas Yojana (VAMBAY) Two million housing programme
was launched by Government of India in 2001- The Government of India is implementing two million
02 to provide shelter or upgrade the existing housing units programme since 1998, which envisages
shelter for people living below poverty line in urban slums construction of 20 lakh additional houses every year. Out
which will help in making cities slum free. of the 20 lakh houses, 13 lakhs are to be constructed in
rural areas and seven lakh in urban area. Under this
This scheme has an objective to provide shelter and
programme, every year HUDCO has been entrusted with
upgrade the existing shelter for below poverty line families
the task of providing loan assistance to facilitate the
in urban slums. The scheme is shared on 50:50 basis with construction of six lakh houses in rural houses & four
states. Preference is given to women headed households. lakh in urban areas.
The government will release subsidy on a 1:1 basis with
loan. Also a national city sanitation project under one title There is at present no housing scheme in the central sector
of “Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan” is an integral sub for the urban poor. There are two central sector
component of VAMBAY in which 20% of total programmes targeted towards the urban poor, namely,
allocation under VAMBAY wil be used. SJSRY and NSDP. SJSRY attempts to provide
employment in order to bring the urban poor above the
VAMBAY is a national level housing scheme of the poverty line while NSDP is basically a programme for
ministry of urban employment & poverty alleviation, the environmental improvement of urban slums. The
Government of India for the benefit of the slum dwellers. urban poverty alleviation strategy is incomplete without
The objective of VAMBAY is primarily to provide shelter a significant component pertaining to housing delivery
or upgrade the existing shelter for people living below for the slum dwellers.
poverty line in urban slums in a march towards the goal In order to fill this gap in a major policy initiative, the prime
of cities without slums and for enabling healthy urban minister announced a new centrally sponsored scheme called
environment. The target group under VAMBAY is all the Valmiki Ambedkar Awas Yojana (VAMBAY) on
slum dwellers in urban areas who are below the poverty the August 15, 2001 to ameliorate the conditions of the
line including members of economically weaker section urban slum dwellers living below poverty line.
(EWS) who do not possess pucca shelter.
The objective of VAMBAY is primarily to provide shelter
VAMBAY is a centrally sponsored Scheme shared on a or upgrade the existing shelter for people living below the
50:50 basis, which envisages an annual subsidy of Rs 1000 poverty line in urban slums in a march towards the goal of
crores from ministry of urban employment & poverty slumless cities with a healthy and enabling urban environment.
alleviation, Government of India, to be matched by an The target group under VAMBAY will be all slum dwellers
equal amount of long term loan from HUDCO to be in urban areas who are below the poverty line including
availed against state government guarantee. members of EWS who do not possess adequate shelter.
The Ministry of urban employment & poverty alleviation, Another very important basic amenity for slum dwellers
Government of India, has sanctioned Rs. 75 Lakhs to especially in congested metropolitan cities is the lack of
Building Materials & Technology Promotion Council rudimentary toilet facilities. A new national city sanitation
(BMTPC), an autonomous body of the ministry, for project under the title of the “National Bharat Abhiyan”
construction of 125 VAMBAY houses as demonstration is an integral sub component of VAMBAY. 20% of the
housing project using cost effective building materials total allocation under VAMBAY will be used for the same
and construction techniques. at the rate of Rs 200 crore as loan from HUDCO and Rs
283
1.5 Although India is undergoing rapid pace of under PURA shall promote four connectivities namely,
development, job opportunities are not growing in physical, electronic, knowledge and economic to
the same proportion. This is largely attributed to a hinterland of selected clusters.
near stagnation of employment in agriculture during
1993-2000, although employment in the services such
Role of housing
as trade, hotel, restaurant, transport, insurance, 1.10 Housing, besides being a very basic requirement for
communication, financial, real estate and business the urban settlers, also holds the key to accelerate the
services have shown significant increase in a range pace of development. Investments in housing like any
of 5-6%. (NSSO- Different Rounds). This factor other industry, has a multiplier effect on income and
contributes to rapid pace of urbanisation. employment. It is estimated that overall employment
generation in the economy due to additional investment
Rural to urban shift of labour force in the housing/construction is eight times the direct
1.6 The share of agriculture in the total workforce has employment (IIM-Ahmedabad Study, 2000). The
shown considerable decline from 60% in 1993-94 construction sector provides employment to 16% of
to 57% in 1999-2000. The share of primary sector is the work force (absolute number 146 lakh-1997). It is
likely to decline further to 37% in 2030 (see Annexure- growing at the rate of 7%. Out of this, the housing
III). This means a large number of rural workforces sector alone accounts for 85.5 lakh workers. However
will migrate to urban areas in search of jobs in nearly 55% of them are in the unskilled category. Skill
secondary and tertiary sector. It is important for them upgradation would result in higher income for the
to have access to employment, shelter and related workers. Housing provides employment to a cross-
services failing which they will contribute to section of people which importantly include poor.
mushrooming growth of slums and substandard Housing also provide opportunities for home-based
habitat. economic activities. At the same time, adequate housing
1.7 The growth of rural population is declining constantly. also decides the health status of occupants. Therefore,
As per the UN (1999) estimates, average annual rate on account of health and income considerations,
of change of total rural population will decline from housing is a very important tool to alleviate poverty
0.82% during 2000-2005 to (-) 0.40% during 2025- and generate employment.
30. This indicates the shift of agricultural workforce
Housing requirements
to other sectors.
1.11 Magnitude of housing requirements is linked to
Regional balance pattern of growth, settlement status and overall shelter
1.8 In this context of rural to urban shift in the labour quality. The cities and towns, which are growing at
force distribution and rapid pace of urbanisation, faster rate need to develop and deliver a faster and
there is a need to ensure a balanced regional growth greater supply of housing.
along with suitable supply of land, shelter and
Growth of slums in India has been at least three
employment opportunities with the overall focus to
times higher than the growth of urban population,
divert flow of migrants across various urban centres
leading to sizeable number of urban population living
and contain concentration of urban population in
in the slums. As per TCPO estimate 2001, 21.7
mega/metro cities.
percent urban population lives in slums. Housing
In-situ urbanisation activities are to be planned according to the growth
1.9 At the same time, it is also important to promote in- pattern of different settlements/cities. Second area
situ urbanisation to reduce overall pace of rural to of concern for adequate housing is the upgradation
urban migration. This again has to among others focus of existing houses including access to minimum
on supply of land, shelter, related infrastructure and services. As per Planning Commission estimates, the
employment opportunities among rural areas. Budget total requirement of urban housing during the 10th
speech for union budget 2005-06 included a special Plan period (2002-2007) works out to 22.44 million
reference to provision of urban amenities in rural areas dwelling units in urban areas consisting of urban
through expansion of unorganised enterprises around housing backlog of 8.89 million dwelling units at the
existing clusters of individual activities and services as beginning of 10th Plan (2002) and additions of new
well as formation of new clusters. These activities housing of 13.55 million dwelling units.
Industry (2.84%) 59.19 60.83 62.56 64.33 66.16 68.04 69.97 71.96
(% share) 17.57 17.86 18.16 18.46 18.77 19.07 19.38 19.69
Services (2.41%) 86.65 88.74 90.88 93.07 95.31 97.61 99.96 102.37
(% share) 25.73 26.06 26.38 26.71 27.03 27.36 27.68 28.01
Industry (2.84%) 92.95 95.22 97.92 100.70 103.56 106.50 109.53 112.64
(% share) 22.53 22.85 23.17 23.50 23.82 24.14 24.47 24.79
Services (2.41%) 126.84 129.89 133.02 136.23 139.51 142.88 146.32 149.85
(% share) 30.86 31.17 31.48 31.79 32.09 32.39 32.69 32.98
Industry (2.84%) 115.84 119.13 122.51 125.99 129.57 133.25 137.03 140.92
(% share) 25.12 25.44 25.77 26.10 26.42 26.75 27.07 27.40
Services (2.41%) 153.46 157.15 160.94 164.82 168.79 172.86 177.03 181.29
(% share) 33.28 33.57 33.86 34.14 34.42 34.70 34.98 35.25
Total 461.15 468.18 475.39 482.78 490.37 498.16 506.15 514.34
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
T
o make special provisions for the areas of Delhi BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-seventh year of
for a period of one year and for matters the republic of India as follows:
connected therewith or incidental hereto.
1. (1) this Act may be called Delhi Laws (special
WHEREAS phenomenal increase in the population Provisions) Act 2006.
owing to migration has put tremendous pressure on land (2) It extends to Delhi.
and infrastructure in Delhi resulting in developments which
(3) It shall cease to have effect on the expiry of one
are not in consonance with the Master Plan of Delhi
year from the date of its commencement, except
2001 and the building bye-laws;
as respects things done or omitted to be done
AND WHEREAS keeping in view the perspective for before such cesser, and upon such cesser section
the year 2021 and emerging new dimensions in urban 6 of the General Clauses Act 1897, shall apply as
development, the central government has proposed if this Act had been repealed by a Central Act.
extensive modifications in the Master Plan for Delhi, 2. (1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires:
which have been published and suggestions and
objections have been received in respect thereof from a) “Building bye-laws” means bye-laws under
the public, and the finalisation of the Master Plan 2021 is Section 481 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation
likely to take some more time; Act, 1957 or the bye-laws made under section
188, sub-section (3) of section 189 and subsection
AND WHEREAS the central government has constituted (1) of section 190 of the Punjab Municipal Act
a committee of experts to look into the various aspects 1911, as in force in New Delhi or regulations made
of unauthorised construction and misuse of premises under sub-section (1) of section 57 of the Delhi
and suggest a comprehensive strategy to deal with them; Development Act , 1957, relating to buildings;
AND WHEREAS a revised policy for relocation and b) “Delhi” means the entire area of the National
rehabilitation of slum dwellers in Delhi is also under Capital Territory of Delhi except the Delhi
consideration of the central government; Cantonment as defined in clause (11) of Section
2 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957;
AND WHEREAS a strategy is proposed to be prepared
by the local authorities in Delhi in accordance with the c) “Encroachment” means unauthorised
National Policy for Urban Street Vendors; occupation of government land or public land
by way of putting temporary, semi-permanent
AND WHEREAS action for violation of the provision or permanent structure for residential use or
of the Master Plan 2001 and building bye-laws, before a commercial use or any other use;
final view is taken in the matter by the government, is
d) “Local authority” means the Delhi Municipal
causing avoidable hardship and irreparable loss to a large
corporation established under the Delhi
number of people;
Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 or the New
AND WHEREAS some time is required for making orderly Delhi Municipal Council established under the
arrangements in terms of the proposed Master Plan 2021; New Delhi Municipal Council Act 1994 or the
AND WHEREAS it is expedient to have a law to provide Delhi development authority established under
temporary relief to the people of Delhi against such action the Delhi Development Act , 1957, legally entitled
for a period of one year within which various policy issues to exercise control in respect of the areas under
referred to above, are expected to be finalised; their respective jurisdiction;
(3) It shall come into force on such date as the central h) “Habitable area” means the area which is
government may, by notification in the official developed with a proper layout plan, with all
gazette, appoint. infrastructural developments like roads, electricity
transformers, water pipes, drainage and
2. DEFINITIONS: In this Act, unless the context sewerage, school buildings, dispensaries,
otherwise requires: playgrounds, etc.
a) “Adequate housing” means every house should i) “Livelihood” means adequate employment of
not measure less than 50 sqm in area with all the dwellers to provide a decent quality of life
basic amenities like water, electricity, sewerage, to all members of the family.
D
raft VII (final), was released in New Delhi on Recalling further that the Convention for the Elimination
October 12, 2004 in consultation with different of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the
organisations prepared by the HRLN and Convention for the Rights of the Child and the
Nivara Hakk Suraksha Samiti, Mumbai. Convention for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination,
all having been ratified by India, commit this country to
Preamble guarantee the right to housing.
Taking note of the Supreme Court decisions in Chameli
Singh v/s State of UP and Shantistar Builders v/s N.K. Realising that the vast majority of the urban poor living
Totame to the effect that the right to housing inheres in in slums out of dire necessity ought not to be treated as
Article 21 of the Constitution of India. mere encroachers, since a multitude of factors force the
Relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in poor to the cities.
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v/s Nawab Khan Recalling that the Urban Land Ceiling Act was enacted,
wherein it was laid down that the State has a constitutional inter alia, to make surplus urban land available for housing
duty to provide adequate facilities, opportunities and the poor.
resources for shelter for weaker sections.
Realising that these evictions can never be a solution to
Reading the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and,
the urban problem; on the contrary this results in terrible
in particular, Article 25(1) describing the right to adequate
suffering for the urban poor.
housing as a basic human right.
Relying on Article 11(1) of the International Covenant Evictee
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), Now therefore, in tune with this nation’s constitutional
which India has ratified, and which commits this country and international obligations and to bring succour to the
to take appropriate steps to ensure the realisation of the millions of the urban poor; this Bill:
right to adequate housing.
Chapter I
Noticing that the ICESCR was interpreted by General
Preliminaries
Comment 7 on Forced Evictions which commits the
States not to carry out forced evictions until all possible 1. (i) The Preamble shall be read as an aid to the
alternatives are explored, and condemns the practice of interpretation of this Act.
forced evictions as a gross violation of human rights.
(ii) This Act shall be called “Housing for the Urban
Regretting the fact that a considerable part of the urban Poor, Bill, 2004
population lives in slums in utter misery.
(iii) This Act shall come into force on notification in
Alarmed at the results of the 1991 census, which the Government of India Gazette.
estimated the housing shortage in the country at 229
million units of which at least 90% was for the poor. (iv) This Act shall extend to the whole of the territory
of India.
Agreeing with the decision of the Constitutional Court
of South Africa in the case of Government of the Chapter II
Republic of South Africa v/s Irene Grootboom, wherein Definitions
it was said that rights ought not to exist on paper only 2. (i) “Slum” means any place of residence of the urban
and the State was held constitutionally liable to poor and unorganised labour, established on land
progressively realise the right to housing. either public or private.
303
(ii) “Progressive realisation of the right to adequate of the urban poor and their places of employment.
housing” means such scheme or plan which shall (iv) In so doing the representatives of the evictees and
substantially improve the conditions of slums civil society have equal rights of participation in the
within a decade while simultaneously providing framing and revising of the plans and schemes.
immediate relief to the most deprived sections.
(v) The State and other authorities shall frame schemes
(iii) “Housing” includes, but is not restricted to, land, to progressively realise the right to adequate housing.
sewage, electricity and water facilities. Such schemes may provide for the payment of a
(iv) “Basic services” reasonable amount by the beneficiaries, keeping in
(v) “Amenities” means all facilities, such as work, view their economic status.
health, education, sanitation, transport etc., which (vi) In framing schemes to house the urban poor
are required to lead a decent life for all individuals. emphasis shall be given to the State providing land
(vi) “Urban” means an area where the population is for housing coupled with credit for housing at
one lakh or above according to the latest census. subsidised rates.
(vii) ‘Blighted area’ means an area within a municipality Chapter IV
containing a majority of structures that have been Rights against eviction
extensively damaged or destroyed by a major 4. (i) All slums that are in existence as on the passing
disaster, or that, by reason of dilapidation, of this Act shall not be evicted.
deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate (ii) No future slum shall be evicted by the State or
provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or any authority or person, unless there is a substantial,
open spaces, unsafe and unsanitary conditions pressing, overriding public project which cannot
which endanger lives or properties by fire or reasonably be located elsewhere.
other hazards and causes, or that, by reason of Ex planation: The setting up of a new institution,
location, in an area with inadequate street layout, of shopping complexes, commercial enterprises,
incompatible land uses or land use relationships, recreation facilities, gardens, garbage disposal facilities,
overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive
roads and the like shall not be considered a public
dwelling unit density, or other identified hazards
project within the meaning of clause (ii) above.
to health and safety, are conducive to ill health,
(iii) Even when it is necessary to evict a slum only
transmission of disease, juvenile delinquency and
such households shall be evicted as are necessary for
crime and are detrimental to the public health,
the implementation of the project. Such households
safety, morals and general welfare.
are evicted, provided an alternate accommodation
(viii)‘Relocation’ means an alternate site within a radius within seven km radius of the evicted site, which
of seven km for the persons evicted. includes housing, basic services, amenities and
(ix) ‘Rehabilitation’ means providing relocated reasonable compensation is given.
persons with basic amenities, services including
Chapter V
means of livelihood.
Right to regularisation in-situ
Chapter III 5. (i) All slums that fall under clause 4 (i) shall be
The right to housing regularised in-situ.
3. (i) The inhabitants living in blighted areas have a right (ii) The states shall mobilise resources for the
to adequate housing. regularisation of slums. This will, however, not
(ii) The State has an obligation to progressively realise preclude the State from charging such reasonable
the right to adequate housing by providing adequate amounts from the beneficiaries keeping in view their
resources, facilities and opportunities for housing the financial capacity.
urban poor. (iii) Regularisation shall be done in collaboration with
the beneficiaries and their representatives.
(iii) The State and other authorities shall within a year of the
coming into force of this Act frame or revise Master Chapter VI
Plans and urban planning schemes to provide adequate Rights during eviction
land and other facilities for the urban poor after 6. (i) No slum falling under clause 4 (ii) shall be evicted
considering all relevant factors including the numbers unless the community is given notice at least six
(iii) The State shall thereafter hear the evictee and in Chapter IX
writing, either rescind, modify or confirm the eviction The housing & Rehabilitation Commission
plan and the relocation and rehabilitation scheme. 9. (i) The state shall set up a four member housing &
This may be done within a period of three months rehabilitation commission consisting of director TCP,
from the date of the notice. expert in urban planning representative of evictees
(iv) The evictees shall have a right to all such information and the NGOs working in the housing sector.
from the authorities connected with the eviction and (ii) In case of dispute arising out of any of the provisions
the relocation and rehabilitation scheme. The of this Act, complaints may be made to the commission
authorities shall make all information available to the whose decisions shall be binding on the State.
evictees/ civil society or their representatives within
a period of 15 days in writing. Chapter X
Allocation of resources and land
(v) All evictions shall be carried out humanely. No eviction 10. (i) The State shall reserve, raise and allocate adequate
shall be done in inclement weather, or in undue haste, land resources for the practical and progressive
or with force, or during school examinations. realisation of the right to housing for the urban poor.
(vi) The authorities shall finalise the relocation site with (ii)Resource allocation of land must be
the facilities in place prior to the eviction.
proportionately increased.
(vii) The authorities shall put in place the benefits and facilities
of the rehabilitation scheme prior to the eviction. Chapter XI
Women’s right
(viii) In deciding upon the relocation site care shall be 11. (i) All documents relating to title, possession and
taken by the authorities to provide the same within the like and all compensation paid and all transactions
seven km of the existing site. entered into in respect of any of the provisions of
Chapter VII this Act shall be made out in the name of the female
Right to relocation head of the family in preference to the male, if such
7. (i) The authorities shall provide transportation to the a female head exist.
evictees at the new site for persons and household
Chapter XII
and other materials from the existing site with
reasonable compensation.
Homeless persons
12 (i) The State shall take such steps to construct one-
(ii) All relocation schemes shall be framed in third number of houses for the homeless and
consultation with the evictees or their representatives.
provide the same free to them in order to
(iii) No amount may be charged from the evictee progressively realise the right to housing and to close
for relocation. the gap between demand and supply.
Chapter VIII (ii) Till the above is substantially achieved the State
Right to rehabiltiation shall open and operate shelters for the homeless
8. (i) The Rehabilitation scheme shall provide inter alia,
providing therein free food to the beneficiaries.
for a site with reasonably hygienic surroundings, a
reasonable quantity of building material, electricity, Chapter - XIII
water, sewage facilities, toilets, schools, dispensaries Urban land ceiling
or hospitals and reasonable compensation and shall 13. (i) The repeal of the Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1999
be framed so as to create at the relocated site at the is hereby repealed.
DELHI ORISSA
65, Masjid Road, Jungpura Flat 403, B Block, Rashmi Vihar Apartments
New Delhi -110014 Budheswari Colony
Tel: +91-11-24374501, 24376922, 24379855 Bhubaneswar-7 51006
Fax: +91-11-24374502 Tel:0674-2314260
E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected]
309
KARNATAKA HIMACHAL PRADESH
20, Park Road Virnal Sadan, ear Co-operative Bank
Tasker Town, Shivaji Nagar Chotta Shimla - 171002 (HP)
Bangalore - 560051 Tel: 0177-2621108, Mobile: 09418141894
Tel: +91-80-57624757 E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
SIKKIM
MADHYA PRADESH Satey Bazar, 2nd Floor, Above Mahesh Saloon,
E-6/101, S-l,Vardhman Residency Upper Sichey Area, Gangtok
12, Arera Colony Sikkim - 737101
Bhopal-462016, Madhya Pradesh Tel: 91-03592-203557, Mobile: 09434382200
Tel: 0755-4202514 E-.mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
ANDAMAN
TAMIL NADU
AB-31, Aberdeen Bazaar, Babu Lane,
#319/155, 2ND floor, Linghi Chetty Street
Port Blair - 01.
Parry's, Chennai - 600001
Tel: 0319-230756, Mobile: 09434281880
Tel: 91-44-42165131/42165121
E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
UTTAR PRADESH
RAJASTHAN
i) ALLAHABAD
49, Vivek Nagar, Station Road
Jaipur - 302006, Rajasthan 105, Ashok Nagar,
Tel: +91-141-2206139, 207446 Allahabad - 211001
E-mail: [email protected] Uttar Pradesh
Tel: +91-0532-623893
ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Ramesh Linggi (Asst. Director of sports) ii) VARANASI
Quarter No-7, Type IV J -19/ 66, Bari Bazar,
Raj iwas Area PS Jaitpura
Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh Varanasi - 221002
Tel: 91-0360-2292561 Uttar Pradesh
Mobile: 0943605907, 09436040383 Tel: 91-542-586676/688
E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected]
This volume is brought out with the hope to facilitate the establishment of a larger
network and linkages with housing rights organisations to strengthen and consolidate
solidarity with the urban poor struggle groups across the country. The Human Rights
Law Networks (HRLN), in collaboration with several other organisations is advocating
the right to housing initiative through various workshops, campaigns and legal
interventions.
The book is essential reading for anyone interested in the community development
programmes including the policymakers, planners, lawyers and human rights
activists as also those who are concerned of the magnitude of the housing problem in
the country.
ISBN 818947916-4
~ ~
9788189479169 >