13 Ho Dany 3 21 - 230809 - 204727
13 Ho Dany 3 21 - 230809 - 204727
13 Ho Dany 3 21 - 230809 - 204727
https://revmaterialeplastice.ro
https://doi.org/10.37358/Mat.Plast.1964
Abstracts.The recycling of high-density polyethylene plastic (HDPE) plays a crucial role in sustainable
development. However, obstacles to the use of recycled HDPE remain because of the material and
processing properties and odors of recycled HDPE. The odor of recycled detergent bottle plastic leads
to rejection by most detergent manufacturers. Recently, some recycling enterprises have adapted
recycling with odor reduction processes involving the use of solvents, antimicrobial additives, and odor
extraction units in feeders and extruders. However, these processes may affect the quality and cost of
recycled plastic. Most small and medium businesses (SMBs) may not favor these effects due to their
limited models and resources. In addition, most SMBs are unwilling to replace their current recycling
operation units. Hence, this study aimed to find alternative and economical ways for odor reduction in
the recycling process. A modification of the recycling process was introduced in the pretreatment of
plastic flakes before entry into the feeder of an extrusion unit. The effect of selected washing
temperatures, i.e., 65℃, 75℃, 85℃, and 95℃, on the removal of odor from recycled HDPE was further
studied. The addition of sodium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate, and citric acid into a heated water
bath enhanced the deodorizing effect. The relationship of these three chemicals with the deodorization
of HDPE plastics was investigated through sensory evaluation. Lastly, the potential of the deodorized
recycled HDPE for resin pellet production and commercialization were investigated.
1.Introduction
Over the last 11 years, the plastics industry has become one of Malaysia's most varied and vibrantly
growing industries, showing an average growth rate of 15% [1]. Malaysia began purchasing recycled
plastic from China in 2017 after China banned plastic imports. Discarded plastic contains 24 recyclable
and solid waste forms [2]. The growth of imported plastic waste has increased the recycling industry's
production. Recycled high-density polyethylene (HDPE) can be categorized into HDPE natural and
HDPE mix. HDPE recycling processes are commonly used in manufacturing domestic goods, such as
bottles, cans, toys, helmets, piping, and recycling bins. For detergent manufacturers, the cost of recycled
HDPE is considerably lower than that of virgin HDPE. However, we face the problem of eliminating
the bad odor of HDPE during recycling. Odor-control recycling technologies are complicated and costly
and thus cannot be afforded by SMEs. Moreover, they may affect the consistency of the plastic being
recycled. New technologies are required to improve HDPE recovery. This study aimed to examine the
deodorization of recycled HDPE through treatment with sodium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate, and
citric acid in a water bath at various temperatures.
Sodium bicarbonate, also known as baking soda, is used as an effective adsorbent in the odor
treatment of recycled HDPE to remove various undesirable substances, such as volatile and toxic
compounds [3]. Sodium citrate, which is obtained from the reaction between sodium bicarbonate and
citric acid, is another odor neutralizer that is useful for eliminating bad smells by balancing pH [4].
*email: [email protected]
Calcium carbonate, also known as limestone, has the capability to mask odor and pungency [5].
encompassed the wavelength range of 4000 cm−1 to 500 cm−1, was used to represent the molecular
fingerprint of the samples.
Table 1. Average scores of odor reduction level based on different temperatures and
washing time using water only in hot washing section
(1= Strong Odors, 5=Weak Odors after treatment)
Time Average scores of an odor reduction level
(minutes)/ Temperature (˚C)
HDPE Natural HDPE Mix
10 min 15min 10 min 15min
65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
75 2.30 2.00 1.00 1.70
85 1.30 1.70 1.00 1.30
95 2.70 2.30 1.30 2.00
Table 2. Average odor reduction scores based on different chemicals used in 95℃ hot water
for HDPE Natural and HDPE Mix in 10 and 15 min, respectively.
(1= Strong Odors, 5=Weak Odors after treatment)
Type of Chemicals/ Type of plastic Average odor reduction scores
HDPE Natural HDPE Mix
Sodium bicarbonate 3.00 2.70
Calcium carbonate 4.00 2.30
Sodium bicarbonate with added citric acid 3.80 4.00
Figure 1. SEM images of surface morphology of HDPE Natural Plastic flake under 50X
magnifying power: A) Unwashed, B) cold wash only C) cold wash 10 min and hot
wash 10 min at 95˚C with added 40g/L calcium carbonate
Figure 3. EDX analysis showed the atomic percentage of each element in HDPE Natural
plastic flake: 1) Unwashed, 2) cold wash only, 3) cold wash 10 min, and hot wash
10 min at 95 ˚C with added 40g/L calcium carbonate
Figure 4. EDX analysis showed the atomic percentage of each element in HDPE Mix flake:
4) Unwashed, 5) cold wash only, 6) cold wash 10 min and hot wash 15 min at 95oC
with added 40g/L sodium bicarbonate
HDPE Mix sodium bicarbonate + citric acid HDPE Natural citric acid + sodium Bicarbonate
Figure 5. FTIR analysis of selected HDPE plastic samples at conditions
Table 1 reveals that the highest odor control score for HDPE natural was obtained by using the hot
washing technique at 95°C for 10 min, whereas the highest score for HDPE mix was obtained through
hot washing at 95°C for 15 min. As inferred from the result, increasing the washing temperature further
should have a substantial effect. However, HDPE has melting points that usually range from 120°C to
150°C [6], and its crystallization temperature is 100°C. In addition, the most appropriate crystallization
temperature for HDPE crystals that are moderately grown on fibers is 100°C, which is the temperature
at which lamellae with the maximum size and uniformity form [7]. Thus, the temperature for washing
was regulated to be below the melting point of HDPE.
A longer hot washing time (15 min) was needed to obtain better odor elimination results for HDPE
mix plastic than for HDPE natural (10 min). The surface of the HDPE plastic was scattered with various
chemicals, mainly volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are responsible for most odors in
synthetic polymers [8]. The removal of VOCs will thus result in odor elimination. Extending the washing
time increased the efficiency of the process because adhesives were effectively eliminated. However,
after prolonged washing, VOC removal became negligible as emissions decreased [9]. Therefore,
washing at 95°C for 10–15 min intervals was sufficient. HDPE mix plastics were more odorous than
HDPE natural plastics because they come from various sources that primarily contained detergents,
cosmetics, and other materials. Hence, a long hot-washing duration was needed for HDPE mix plastics.
The hot water temperature of 95℃ was chosen for the chemical treatment of HDPE natural and
HDPE mix for 10 and 15 min. As shown in Table 2, the best results for HDPE mix were achieved through
washing with sodium bicarbonate and citric acid; however, calcium carbonate was more effective in
washing out the odor of HDPE natural. The FTIR results showed that the peak of HDPE natural after
washing with sodium bicarbonate and citric acid was higher than that after washing with calcium
carbonate. The HDPE mix exhibited the opposite effects.
As shown in Figure 1 and 2, the surfaces of HDPE natural (A) and HDPE mix (D) without any
treatment were rough and coated with dirt and impurities. However, the surface of HDPE Natural (B)
became clean and smooth after cold washing. A white residue became evenly distributed on the surface
of HDPE natural (C) after hot washing with calcium carbonate. As shown in (E) and (F), the surface of
HDPE mix was still rougher compared with that of HDPE natural but showed less dirt after cold and hot
washing.
EDX analysis showed that the percentage of each element in both types of recycled HDPE had
decreased. EDX analysis revealed that the surfaces of HDPE samples 1 and 4 comprised numerous
elements that originated from various chemicals that were retained. Although further cold and hot
washing with calcium carbonate at the optimal temperature (2 & 3) would wash off some chemical
compounds that were scattered on the surfaces of HDPE natural, calcium carbonate precipitates would
remain (3). Moreover, fewer elements were scattered on (6) than on (5) due to the effectiveness of
sodium bicarbonate treatment. The use of chemical material in a hot wash left some compounds with
calcium and sodium elements scattered on (3) and (6).
FT‐IR was carried out to determine the chemical changes in HDPE samples before and after
treatment. The FT-IR result in Figure 5 showed that the characteristic peaks corresponding to the
structure of the chemicals reduced significantly when HDPE underwent a series of washes. The peak
value of unwashed HDPE natural is shown in Table 3. After chemical treatment, the peaks of the
carbonyl compound, hetero-oxy compounds, and ether and oxy compounds reduced. The functional
groups of organic components on the surface of HDPE natural are tabulated in Table 3. The peak values
of the unwashed HDPE mix are shown in Table 4. The peaks of aliphatic alkane, aryl group, aliphatic
organo-halogen compound, hetero-oxy compounds, inorganic ions, ether, and oxy compound group,
aromatic amino, alcohol and hydroxy compound, methyne, aryl group, amine, and amino reduced after
chemical treatment.
Table 3. Peaks value of untreated HDPE Natural and corresponded to its characteristics [10]
Wavelength (cm-1) Functional group Description
2919.36 / 2849.94 Aliphatic alkane Methylene C-H asym. / sym. stretch
1745.59 Carbonyl compound Alkyl carbonate and Ester
1539.79 Hetero-oxy compound Aromatic nitro compound
1463.17 Aliphatic alkane Methyl C-H asym. Bend
Inorganic ions Carbonate ion
Aryl group C=C-C stretch
875.91 Inorganic ions Carbonate ion
Hetero-oxy compound Aromatic phosphates
Ether and oxy compound Peroxides, C-O-O- stretch
718.66 Organo-halogen compound Aliphatic chloro-compound, C-Cl stretch
Alcohol and hydroxy compound Alcohol, OH out-of-plane bend
Table 4. Peaks value of untreated HDPE Mix and corresponded to its characteristics [10]
Wavelength (cm-1) Functional group Description
725.32 Organo-halogen compound Aliphatic chloro-compound, C-Cl stretch
Aliphatic alkane Methylene (CH2)n rocking
872.92 Ether and oxy compound group Peroxides, C-O-O-stretch
Hetero-oxy compound Aromatic phosphates
Inorganic ions Carbonate ion
1017.79 Aliphatic alkane Cyclohexane ring vibration, Skeletal C-C vibrations
Aryl group Aromatic C-H in-plane bend
The effective chemical compounds in the HDPE mix were the mixture of sodium bicarbonate and
citric acid. Baking soda is a weak alkali that can easily dissolve dirt and grease when utilized as a gentle
scouring powder in water. It also has unique buffering capabilities. It deodorizes by neutralizing acidic
and basic odor molecules, thus creating an odor-free state [11]. Citrate salt is produced through the
combination of two chemicals. Alkali metal citrate salts are readily soluble in water. The odors have at
least one functional group that could react with citrate salts. This reaction changed the compound
structure, resulting in a reduction or loss of the odorous characteristics of HDPE mix [12]. For HDPE
natural, calcium carbonate was highly efficient in minimizing offensive odors that contained alcohol
because it has high adsorption energy for alcohol groups. It has an affinity for delocalizing charges by
ordering the –OH group end of organic molecules such that molecular O associates with atomic Ca,
whereas H associates with CO3 [13].
4. Conclusions
This research was performed to investigate the usage of chemicals to deodorize HDPE plastics
naturally at 95°C over a fixed period. Numerous odorants were found to be involved in the odors of the
sample and were successfully detected by targeted odorant analysis. This study showed that the causative
odorants included a wide variety of complex chemical structures. A mixture of sodium bicarbonate
(baking soda) and citric acid exerted significant deodorizing effects on HDPE mix, whereas calcium
carbonate demonstrated promising deodorizing effects on HDPE natural. The various sources of HDPE
plastics contributed various odorants that affected the effectiveness of particular chemicals in odor
reduction. The modified washing method greatly reduced the overall strength of odors. Developing
viable concepts for postconsumer HDPE packaging is vital for a circular economy.
Acknowledgement. The authors would like to thank Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia and
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for their financial support under the grant FRGS/1/2018/TK05/UKM/
02/4 and GUP-2017-041.
References
1.KEMENTERIAN PERUMAHAN DAN KERAJAAN TEMPATAN, (2011), A Study on Plastic
Management in Peninsular Malaysia.
2.WONG, E. K., & JASMIN, A. F., (2019), Plastic: An Undegradable Problem. Retrieved July 20, 2020,
from http://www.krinstitute.org/Views-@-Plastic-;_An_Undegradable_Problem.aspx
3.JEONG, S., & YOO, S., (2017), Preparation and properties of sodium bicarbonate-incorporated LDPE
films with deodorising function for kimchi packaging. Packaging Technology and Science, 30(12), 781–
790. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2333
4. ***Anon, (2019), The Science of Febreze . Retrieved July 20, 2020, from
https://www.febreze.com/en-us/safety/science-and-chemicals-in-febreze
5.ADAMS, C., (2013), Using Barn Lime. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from
https://info.mannapro.com/equine/Using-Barn-Lime-Think-Again-Our-Friend-Sweet-Pea-Explains-
Why
6.O PALENE, (2016), MSDS of High Density Polyethylene. Retrieved from
https://www.opalindia.in/PDF/HDPE/Material Safety Data Sheet_HDPE.pdf
7.MIAO, W., ZHU, H., DUAN, T., CHEN, H., WU, F., JIANG, L., & WANG, Z., (2018), High-density
poly-ethylene crystals with double melting peaks induced by ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene
fibre. Royal Society Open Science, 5(7), 180394. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180394
8.HODGSON, S. C., CASEY, R. J., BIGGER, S. W., & SCHEIRS, J., (2000), Review of volatile organic
compounds derived from polyethylene. Polymer - Plastics Technology and Engineering, 39(5), 845–
874. https://doi.org/10.1081/PPT-100101409
9.KREHULA, L. K., SIROCIC, A. P., DUKIC, M., & HRNJAK-MURGIC, Z. (2012). Cleaning
efficiency of poly(ethylene terephthalate) washing procedure in recycling process. Journal of
Elastomers and Plastics, 45(5), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095244312457798
10.COATES, J., (2006), Interpretation of Infrared Spectra, A Practical Approach. In Encyclopedia of
Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470027318.a5606
11.***Gonneville Inc., (2018), Baking Soda Abrasive. Retrieved July 30, 2020, from
https://gonneville.com/baking-soda-abrasive/
12.***Anon, (2013), Citrate Salts for Eliminating Odors. Retrieved July 14, 2020, from
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/5b/cc/87/b98f7ffcb666a2/WO2014137350A1.pdf
13.DENIS V., OKHRIMENK O., JOANNA NISSENBAUM, MARTIN PETER ANDERSSON, MATS
M.H. OLSSON, S. L. S. S., (2013), Adsorption Energies of Functional Groups to Calcium Carbonate
Polymorphs: The Importance of -OH and -COOH groups. Langmuir 29(35): 11062-11073.
https://doi.org/10.1021/la402305x