Republic of the Philippines

Province of Southern Leyte

Municipality of Hinundayan

MUNICIPAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT OFFICE

POST-ACTIVITY REPORT
TITLE OF LGU HINUNDAYAN
ACTIVITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) Training Course
DATE(S) 2023-10-10 to 2023-10-13
As provided for in the Republic Act (RA) 10121, the Office of Civil Defense (OCD),
as the Executive Arm and Secretariat of the National Disaster Risk Reduction and
Management Council (NDRRMC), is mandated to establish standard operating
procedures (SOPs) for coordination across all phases of disaster. Under the
thematic area of Disaster Response, one of the coordinating mechanisms
established is the Incident Command System (ICS). Introduced in the country by
the United States Forest Service (USFS), ICS is a standard, on-scene, all-hazard
incident management concept that can be used by all response groups. It helped
to enhance the operations of responders particularly in ensuring accountability,
facilitating proper resource management, and promoting safety.

Aside from ICS, another significant disaster response program of the NDRRMC is
the Cluster Approach. As stipulated in the National Disaster Response Plan, the
Response Clusters shall serve as the operating mechanisms to provide
widespread support in terms of resources pooling and mobilization for massive
humanitarian assistance and disaster response services. The ICS and the Cluster
BACKGROUND Approach are two distinct yet complementary systems. As evidenced by past
major operations for disasters and planned events in the country, both systems
effectively complement each other by using the “force-provider” and
“forceemployer” relationship. ICS, as the “force employer”, is used to manage on-
scene response while the Response Clusters, as the “force providers”, act as
supporters to the Incident Management Teams (IMTs). To facilitate the
interoperability of these two (2) important entities, the Emergency Operations
Center (EOC) has been underscored.

The EOC is the facility equipped with personnel and resources that serves as
repository of information and main hub for coordination to support the
management of an incident or planned event. In this context, the EOC acts as the
link between the IMTs and the Response Clusters. While RA 10121 clearly
requires the establishment of operation centers across all the DRRMC levels,
there have been no clear guidelines and training as to how to properly manage
and operate an EOC. Evidently, establishing an EOC as physical facility complete
with monitoring tools and communications equipment is not enough given all the
complexities of providing linkages between the IMTs and the Response Clusters.
While there are some well-maintained and sophisticated EOCs established in
some parts of the countries, there has been no common operating procedure as
to how inter-agency and multi-level coordination of response shall be facilitated.
GENERAL OBJECTIVE: To develop the knowledge, attitude and skills required
in the effective operationalization and management of an EOC.

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES Upon completion of the training, the participants will be

able to:

OBJECTIVE(S) 1. Discuss the concept of the EOC, its legal mandate, and role in the broader
spectrum of the Philippine DRRM system;
2. Discuss the approaches for the EOC operations;
3. Describe the considerations for staffing and organizing an EOC;
4. Determine the physical building requirements for establishing an EOC; 5.
Explain the communication essentials of an EOC;
6. Discuss considerations for information management as applied in an EOC;

Page 1 of 25
 7. Explain the EOC planning process and its importance;
8. Describe the approaches in ensuring the readiness of an EOC; and
9. Apply the principles on EOC operationalization and management through
functional exercise.

NO. OF
33 PARTICIPANTS ( WITH CERTIFICATES OF COMPLETION)
GRADUATES
FUNDING
SPECIAL TRUST FUND
SOURCE
HIGHLIGHTS Day 0: Training preliminary activities such as the opening program, groupings,
pre-test, and expectation setting are carried out and facilitated by the Course
Monitor and Resource Person Mr. Leandro Fornillos.

Day 1

Module 1: Introduction to EOC BY MR. LEANDRO FORNILLOS Training

Staff OCD 8
Introduction to EOC:

 Purpose and Function of EOC: Mr. Fornillos discussed the fundamental

purpose of an EOC, which is to serve as the central command and
coordination center during emergencies and disasters. EOCs facilitate the
management of resources, information, and actions to effectively respond
to and recover from incidents.

 Legal Basis and Framework of EOC: This part of the presentation

highlighted the legal and regulatory foundation that governs the
establishment and operation of EOCs. It typically includes laws and
regulations that define the roles, responsibilities, and authority of EOCs
during emergencies.

 Role of EOC in PDRRMS (Preparedness, Disaster Risk Reduction,

and Management): The presentation emphasized that EOCs play a
critical role in all phases of the disaster management cycle, including
preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery. This involves risk
assessment, emergency planning, resource management, and
collaboration with various agencies and communities to reduce disaster
risks and enhance resilience.

Module 2: EOC Operations by MR. RAFAEL VINCENT MOONEY,

PDRRMO LEYTE STAFF

1.EOC Activation:

 Purpose of EOC Activation: Mr. RV Mooney discussed on the

circumstances and criteria that trigger the activation of the EOC, such as
the nature and severity of the incident, to ensure a swift and appropriate
response.

 Activation Procedures: The partiicpants learned the established

protocols and steps involved in activating the EOC, including notifying key
personnel, setting up communication systems, and assembling response
teams.

2. Initial EOC Actions:

MR. Mooney further discussed on:

 Assessing the Situation: To focus on the immediate actions that EOC

staff take upon activation, including assessing the incident, gathering
situational information, and identifying initial response needs.

 Communication and Information Sharing: Emphasized the importance

of efficient communication and collaboration with external agencies, the
public, and media during the initial phase of the incident.

Page 2 of 25
3. EOC Staff-IMT Interface:

 Collaboration with IMT: He reiterated the ways in which EOC staff and
Incident Management Teams (IMT) interact and coordinate efforts during
incident response.

4. Interoperability of Response Clusters:

 Cluster Functions: Highlighted the various response clusters within the

EOC, such as operations, planning, logistics, and finance/administration,
and how they work together to address specific aspects of incident
response.

 Interoperability: Emphasized the importance of interoperability between

response clusters to share information, resources, and support
seamlessly.

5. EOC and IMT:

 Complementary Roles: Discussed the distinct but complementary roles

of the EOC and IMT in incident response, with the IMT typically managing
field operations and the EOC providing strategic guidance, resources, and
coordination.

 Incident Command Structure: Clarified the structure and responsibilities

of the Incident Commander and how the EOC supports the IMT in the
field.

6. EOC Deactivation:

 Criteria for Deactivation: Identified the criteria and considerations that

lead to the decision to deactivate the EOC, such as achieving incident
objectives or transitioning to recovery and mitigation.

 Deactivation Procedures: Learned the steps and responsibilities

involved in the deactivation process, including documenting lessons
learned for future improvements.

Module 3: EOC Organization and Staffing by

MR. VENANCIO P. SAMALCA- PDRRMO SOUTHERN LEYTE STAFF

1. Functional Approach for EOC Organization:

 Clustered Functions: Mr. Venz Samalca discussed how EOCs are

organized into functional clusters or sections, each responsible for
specific aspects of incident management, such as operations, planning,
logistics, and finance/administration.

 Role and Responsibilities: Explained the roles and responsibilities of

each functional cluster within the EOC and how they contribute to effective
incident response.

 Interconnectivity: Emphasized the importance of seamless

communication and collaboration among functional clusters to ensure a
coordinated response.

2. Factors to Consider in Determining EOC Staffing Requirements:

 Incident Complexity: Highlighted that the staffing requirements for the

EOC can vary based on the complexity, scale, and type of incident. More
significant incidents may require additional staff and resources.

 Resource Availability: Discussed how staffing may be influenced by the

availability of resources, including personnel, equipment, and technology.

Page 3 of 25
  Legal and Regulatory Obligations: Explained the impact of legal and
regulatory requirements on EOC staffing. Compliance with laws related to
personnel, privacy, and response protocols is critical.

 Community Needs: Stressed the importance of aligning EOC staffing

with the specific needs of the community, considering factors such as
demographics, vulnerabilities, and cultural considerations.

 Resource Management: Discussed how staffing must address resource

management, including resource allocation, logistics support, and
financial oversight.

 Community and Stakeholder Engagement: Highlighted the role of EOC

staffing in engaging with community leaders and stakeholders to ensure
their concerns and needs are addressed.

 Training and Capacity Building: Explained the ongoing training and

capacity building requirements for EOC staff to ensure their readiness and
effectiveness in various incident scenarios.

 Scalability and Flexibility: Emphasized the need for staffing plans that
are scalable and flexible to adapt to changing incident conditions.

Module 4: EOC Facility Design and Requirements by MR. CLIFF ERROL

REPALDA , MDRRMO ALANGALANG

. 1. Considerations for EOC Design:

 Purpose and Function: Mr. Repalda discussed the fundamental purpose
and functions of the EOC, emphasizing that the facility's design should
align with these core functions.

 Location: Addressed the importance of selecting an appropriate location,

taking into account factors such as accessibility, proximity to key
agencies, and vulnerability to natural or man-made hazards.

 Security: Highlighted the need for security measures to protect sensitive

information and ensure the safety of EOC staff.

 Space Requirements: Explored the space requirements for EOC

operations, including areas for decision-making, communication, logistics,
and resource management.

 Technology Infrastructure: Discussed the essential technology

infrastructure, including communication systems, data centers, and power
backup, to support EOC operations.

2. EOC Readiness Levels:

 Scalability: Explained the concept of EOC readiness levels, which

consider the scalability of the facility to accommodate different incident
sizes and complexities.

 Levels of Activation: Described the various levels of EOC activation,

such as partial activation for smaller incidents and full activation for large-
scale disasters.

3. Considerations for Multi-Use of Facilities:

 Shared Facilities: Discussed the potential for sharing EOC facilities with
other government agencies, and how this can maximize resources and
efficiency.

 Training and Drills: Emphasized the need for coordination and joint
training exercises when multiple agencies share an EOC facility.

 Security and Access Control: Addressed security and access control

protocols when EOC facilities are shared among multiple agencies.

Page 4 of 25
4. Importance of Having an Alternate EOC:

 Redundancy: Stressed the importance of having an alternate EOC, also

known as a backup or secondary EOC, to ensure continuity of operations
in case the primary facility becomes unavailable.

 Alternate EOC Location: Discussed the criteria and location selection for
alternate EOC facilities, which should be geographically separate from the
primary EOC.

 Equipment Redundancy: Explained the need for redundant equipment

and technology in the alternate EOC to support seamless transition during
an incident.

 Testing and Drills: Highlighted the importance of conducting drills and

testing at the alternate EOC to ensure readiness.

Module 5: Determining EOC Communication Requirements by MR.

VENANCIO P. SAMALCA

1. Key Considerations for Establishing Communication Systems in EOC:

 Purpose and Function: Mr. Venz Samalca discussed the core functions
of an EOC and how communication systems are integral to facilitating
these functions, including information sharing, coordination, and decision-
making.

 Interoperability: Highlighted the importance of communication systems

that can interoperate with multiple agencies and jurisdictions to ensure
seamless information exchange.

 Redundancy: Emphasized the need for redundancy in communication

systems to maintain operational continuity in case of system failures or
disruptions.

 Security: Addressed the security measures required to protect sensitive

information and ensure the integrity of communication systems.

2. Communication Infrastructure and Technologies:

 Communication Infrastructure: Explained the various components of
communication infrastructure, including networks, hardware, and software
that support EOC operations.

 Types of Technologies: Discussed the range of communication

technologies available, such as radio systems, satellite communication,
cellular networks, and the internet, and how they can be employed in
different scenarios.

 Compatibility: Emphasized the compatibility of communication

technologies with the needs of the EOC and the incident type, considering
voice, data, and video communication.

 Data Management: Highlighted the importance of data management

systems and software for processing and analyzing information collected
from various sources

Module 6: EOC Information Management Requirements by MR. CLIFF

ERROL REPALDA

1. EOC Information Needs:

 Identifying Information Needs: Mr. Ripalda discussed the importance of
identifying and prioritizing information needs specific to the incident and
EOC functions. Information needs may include situational awareness,
resource status, and public information.

Page 5 of 25
  Timeliness and Relevance: Emphasized the need for timely and
relevant information to support effective decision-making during an
incident.

 Data Sources: Explained where EOCs can gather information from,

including field reports, government agencies, non-governmental
organizations, and the public.

 Customized Information Products: Highlighted the creation of

customized information products that meet the requirements of different
EOC sections, such as operations, planning, and logistics.

2. EOC Information Management Technology and Systems:

 Technology Infrastructure: Discussed the technology and hardware
required to collect, store, and disseminate information, such as computer
systems, servers, and data storage solutions.

 Information Management Software: Explored the use of information

management software and systems to organize, analyze, and visualize
data effectively.

 Integration of Data Sources: Highlighted the importance of integrating

data from various sources to create a comprehensive, real-time picture of
the incident.

 Data Security: Addressed data security measures, including access

controls and encryption, to protect sensitive information.

3. Importance of Joint Information System:

 Collaborative Information Sharing: Emphasized the need for a Joint
Information System (JIS) to facilitate collaborative information sharing and
coordination among multiple agencies and jurisdictions.

 Roles and Responsibilities: Explained the roles and responsibilities

within the JIS, including the Joint Information Center (JIC), Public
Information Officer (PIO), and Information Officers from various
organizations.

 Consistent Messaging: Stressed the importance of delivering consistent

and accurate information to the public and media to avoid confusion and
misinformation during an incident.

 Crisis Communication Planning: Discussed the development of crisis

communication plans and strategies within the JIS to address public
information needs and the management of rumors and misinformation.

Module 7: EOC PLANNING PROCESS by MR. RAFAEL VINCENT MOONEY

The 6 Essential Steps of the EOC Planning Process:

 1. Form the Team: Mr. RV Mooney discussed the importance of

assembling a competent and diverse team with clear roles and
responsibilities for EOC planning. Team members should bring different
expertise and perspectives to the planning process.
 2. Understand the Situation: Emphasized the need to conduct a
thorough assessment of the current situation. This involves gathering
information about the incident, identifying its context, and understanding
the potential impacts on the community.
 3. Determine Objectives and Strategies: Stressed the significance of
setting clear, achievable objectives and corresponding strategies. These
objectives serve as guiding principles for the EOC's response and
recovery efforts.
 4. Develop the Plan: Described the process of developing a
comprehensive EOC action plan. This plan should outline specific actions,
responsibilities, and resource requirements for each EOC section or
functional cluster.

Page 6 of 25
  5. Approve and Disseminate the Plan: Explained the importance of
obtaining approval for the EOC action plan from relevant authorities and
stakeholders. Once approved, disseminate the plan to all EOC staff and
partners involved in the response.
 6. Execute, Evaluate, and Refine the Plan: Discussed the execution of
the plan during the incident. Emphasize the importance of constant
evaluation and refinement based on changing circumstances and lessons
learned during response efforts.

Purpose of Developing an EOC Action Plan:

 Strategic Guidance: Clarifyrd that the EOC action plan provides strategic
guidance to EOC staff and responders. It outlines specific actions,
responsibilities, and resource requirements to guide decision-making.
 Coordination: Highlighted the plan's role in facilitating coordination and
collaboration among EOC sections and external agencies. It ensures a
unified and synchronized response to the incident.
 Accountability: Stressed that the EOC action plan assigns clear
responsibilities, which helps maintain accountability within the EOC.
Everyone knows their role and function.
 Efficiency: Described how the plan promotes efficiency by streamlining
response activities and reducing duplication of efforts. It minimizes
confusion and enhances the overall effectiveness of the response.
 Adaptability: EmphasizedS the plan's adaptability to changing
circumstances, allowing for a dynamic response to evolving incidents. It
helps the EOC respond effectively to unexpected developments.

Module 8: EOC READINESS by MR. LEANDRO FORNILLOS

1. Importance of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs):

 Guidance and Consistency: Mr. Drew Fornillos discussed the role of
SOPs in providing clear and standardized guidance for EOC operations.
SOPs ensure that staff follow established protocols consistently.

 Emergency Response: Emphasized how SOPs are critical for

emergency response by outlining specific actions, roles, and
responsibilities for each EOC section or functional cluster.

 Adaptability: Highlighted that SOPs should be adaptable to different

incident types and sizes, allowing the EOC to respond effectively to a
range of emergencies.

2. Training:
 Personnel Preparedness: Stressed the importance of training EOC staff
to ensure they are well-prepared for their roles and responsibilities during
incidents.

 Simulation and Scenario-Based Training: Discussed the value of

conducting training exercises that simulate real-life scenarios, allowing
staff to practice their skills and decision-making.

 Continuous Learning: Emphasized the need for ongoing training and

professional development to keep EOC staff updated on the latest best
practices and technologies.

3. Tests and Exercises:

 Functional Testing: Explained the role of tests and exercises in
evaluating the functionality of EOC systems and processes.

 Scenario-Based Drills: Highlighted the use of scenario-based drills to

assess the EOC's response to specific incident types, ensuring readiness
and identifying areas for improvement.

 Interagency Cooperation: Discussed the benefits of conducting multi-

agency exercises to enhance coordination and collaboration during
response efforts.

Page 7 of 25
 4. After-Action Reviews (AARs):
 Evaluating Performance: Described how AARs are used to evaluate the
performance of the EOC and its staff during exercises and actual
incidents.

 Identifying Strengths and Weaknesses: Discussed the role of AARs in

identifying strengths and weaknesses in EOC operations, communication,
and coordination.

 Improvement Planning: Emphasize that AARs lead to the development

of improvement plans that guide the EOC in addressing identified
weaknesses and enhancing its readiness.

ISSUES AND 1. Size of the Venue:

CONCERNS  Limited Space: EOC training often involves numerous
participants and requires dedicated spaces for various
functional clusters. Limited space can be a challenge in
accommodating everyone comfortably.
 Simulation Space: Creating a realistic EOC simulation
may require significant space and resources, which can be
challenging to secure.
2. Short-Time Preparations for EOC Planning:
 Time Constraints: Training may be scheduled with tight
timeframes, limiting the depth of EOC planning and
preparedness activities that can be covered.
3. Food Menu:
 Dietary Restrictions: Catering for EOC training can be
challenging when considering participants' diverse dietary
preferences and restrictions, including allergies, cultural
preferences, and dietary requirements. Some participants
prefer a local food menu.
WAYS The majority of participants intend to undergo more training and are
FORWARD willing to undergo the ladderized ICS courses.

PHOTOS

Page 8 of 25
Page 9 of 25
Page 10 of 25
Page 11 of 25
Page 12 of 25
Page 13 of 25
Page 14 of 25
Page 15 of 25
Page 16 of 25
Page 17 of 25
Page 18 of 25
Page 19 of 25
Page 20 of 25
LIST OF Resource Persons:
RESOURCE MR. LEANDRO C. FORNILLOS
PERSONS, MR. VENANCIO SAMALCA
FACILITATO MR.RAFAEL VINCENT MOONEY
RS, AND MR.CLIFF ERROL RIPALDA
SECRETERI
AT
Course Monitor: LEANDRO C. FORNILLOS

Secretariat: Melanie B. Amper

Levy A. Pastera

ANNEXES List of Graduates

Level 1 Reaction Evaluation Report
Level 2 Learning Evaluation Report

Page 21 of 25
 LIST OF GRADUATES

OCD ID Extension
No. Number First Name Middle Name Last Name Name Sex Position/Designation
1 22-305073 AGNES ESCALERA DELA PEÑA N/A F PRIVATE SECRETARY II
2 22-305074 GRACE ALAS BELETA N/A F ADMIN CLERK
3 22-295421 LERMA GARCES LAGUMBAY N/A F SB MEMBER
4 22-304571 CONSUELO RETULLA DY N/A F SB MEMBER
5 22-304567 ANNA FEBB BERMOY CAZON N/A F SB MEMBER
6 22-304570 MARIA EDITHA TESADO RAMIREZ N/A F SB MEMBER
7 22-304572 JEANETTE MOLE ABUYOG N/A F SB MEMBER
8 22-304566 CRESENTE CRAVE PEDRERA N/A M SB MEMBER
9 22-304574 RIMANDO EPONDULAN VILLAMOR N/A M LIGA PRESIDENT
SK FEDERATION
10 22-304575 IZRA CUEVAS ALBUNA N/A M PRESIDENT
KATHLEEN
11 22-278913 PONCE VILLAMOR COCHARO N/A F LDRRMO II
12 22-293750 GLORYJEN SOMBOL JAMO-AY N/A F MDRRMO STAFF
13 22-305159 LINO ALIBANGBANG MEREZ N/A M MDRRMO STAFF
14 22-296898 ELIZA BLANCO SUNGA N/A F MDRRMO VOLUNTEER
15 22-304607 DENNIS CABALQUINTO PADOLINA N/A M MLGOO/CESE
16 22-295463 FLORA OBINA NEDRUDA N/A F SWO III
17 22-305071 NORBERTO MOPON BUENO N/A M ECET 1
18 22-304576 JUNAFE JAPSON ACEJO N/A F SB SECRETARY
19 22-305143 VILSASAR RESPECIA COLIAO N/A M OIC
20 22-304613 HECTOR ANTIPALA GOLLE N/A M ASSISTANT PCR
21 22-305114 DIODELYN MARIÑO ESTRADA N/A F FO2
22 22-305070 RICA ALBUERA MIOLE N/A F BUDGET STAFF
MUNICIPAL
23 22-305120 ARTHUR RYAN ALVAREZ OYONG N/A M ACCOUNTANT
24 22-305077 MARY FELICILDA PASTERA N/A F MIDWIFE
25 22-305078 DYLENE BALUNDO BOYO N/A F ADMIN AIDE
26 22-295267 CRISTANO RESMA BUAL N/A M MA DESIGNATE
27 22-305116 ROCEL BACLAYON CELESTE N/A M MENRO DESIGNATE
SUPPLY OFFICER I, HRMO
28 22-305166 CRISPINA CALVAR ADOLFO N/A F DESIGNATE
29 22-305293 MARIA DAISY BALUNDO BACUS N/A F TEACHER III
MARK
30 22-304616 ALEXANDER GUPIO LANSANG N/A M ELEMENTARY TEACHER
31 22-305126 MARIO ACEDILLO VILLAS N/A M HT IV/ SCHOOL HEAD
32 22- 295230 MA. BELLA JADLOCON GILBUENA N/A F MPDC
33 MELECIO BONITE MATUNOG JR M MUNICIPAL DRIVER

Page 22 of 25
 LEVEL 1 REACTION EVALUATION REPORT

1– 2- 3- 4 – Very 5–
MODULE Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Outstanding
Module 1: Introduction to EOC 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0(0%) 3(9.09%) 30(90.91%)

Module 2: EOC OPERATIONS 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3(9.09%) 30(90.91%)

Module 3: EOC ORGANIZATION 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (12.12%) 29(87.88%)

AND STAFFING

Module 4: EOC FACILITY 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (12.12%) 29(87.88%)

DESIGN AND
REQUIREMENTS

Module 5: EOC 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0(0%) 3(9.09%) 30(90.91%)

COMMUNICATION
REQUIREMENTS

Module 6: EOC INFORMATION 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3(9.09%) 30(90.91%)

MANAGEMENT

Module 7: EOC PLANNING 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3(9.09%) 30(90.91%)

PROCESS

Module 8: EOC READINESS 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3(9.09%) 30(90.91%)

Overall Training Evaluation 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3(9.09%) 30(90.91%)

Analysis

Module 1 - Based on the evaluation, participants gave the resource person, Mr.
Leandro Fornillos, an average rating of 4.90%. He discussed the introduction to the
concept of the EOC, its legal mandate, and its role in a broader spectrum of the
PDRRMS.

Module 2 - Based on the evaluation, participants gave the resource person, Mr. Rafael
Vincent Mooney, an average rating of 4.90%. He has described the process of how to
operationalize an EOC, including the relationship between EOC staff, clusters, and
IMTs.

Module 3 - Based on the evaluation, participants gave the resource person,

Mr.Venancio P. Samalca, an average rating of 4.87%. He has emphasized the
considerations for staffing and organizing an EOC in accordance with the principles of
ICS, and considerations for EOC staffing and stress management.

Module 4 - Based on the evaluation, participants gave the resource person, Mr. Cliff
Errol Ripalda, an average rating of 4.87%. He has emphasized the essentials in
establishing the EOC as facility as well as other building requirements.

Page 23 of 25
Module 5 - Based on the evaluation, participants gave the resource person,
Mr.Venancio P. Samalca, an average rating of 4.90%. He has emphasized the primary
requirements for EOC communications and common communication technologies.

Module 6 - Based on the evaluation, participants gave the resource person, Ms. Mr.
Cliff Errol Ripalda, an average rating of 4.90%. He has discussed how to determine
EOC information needs, the importance of information management systems, and
meeting public information demands.

Module 7 - Based on the evaluation, participants gave the resource person, Mr. Rafael
Vincent Mooney, an average rating of 4.90%. He has presented the importance of
action planning to achieve EOC priorities.

Module 8 - Based on the evaluation, participants gave the resource person, Mr.
Leandro Fornillos, an average rating of 4.90%. He has provided key recommendations
on ensuring capability readiness of an EOC as part of the ways ahead.

Average Overall Training Course Rating: 4.90%

Analysis

The majority of participants have expressed their appreciation for the training
methodologies as well as the concepts and principles they have learned, particularly
because of their applicability in and out of the workplace. Most people also agree that
the 4-day duration is adequate. The majority of the participants are comfortable with
their room accommodation. Some participants have expressed dissatisfaction with the
limited area for the venue especially for workshops. Some participants also
commented on the variety of foods that would be served, particularly at breakfast, and
preferred traditional local foods rather than the continental foods served. However, the
majority of participants rated the overall training as excellent, resulting in the training's
success and passing the required rate.

LEVEL 2 LEARNING EVALUATION REPORT

Pre-Test Post-Test

Mean: 10.30 Mean: 17.24

Median: 11 Median: 18
Mode: 12 Mode: 18
Range : 12 Range : 6
Minimum: 4 Minimum: 14
Maximum: 16 Maximum: 20
Count: 33 Count: 33
Sum: 340 Sum: 569

Analysis

Based on the pre-test results, 1 participant received a score of 16, and 19 other
participants received a score greater than 10. This indicates that some of the
participants were able to browse the Trainee's manual prior to the preliminaries, as it
was distributed upon arrival while waiting for the preliminaries to begin or some are
familiar with the terms already. The resource persons/instructors are more specific in
providing examples that are relatable and practical in the participants' respective LGU
settings. The instructors have explained the EOC concepts and applications in the
most straightforward manner possible.

Page 24 of 25
In the post-test, all participants passed with an average of 17.24 out of 20 items. 5
participants also received a perfect score of 20. This demonstrates that the participants'
understanding and appreciation of EOC has greatly improved, and that the training
objectives have been met.

EOC training for LGU HINUNDAYAN is a success based on the obvious results.

Prepared by:

KATHLEEN PONCE V. COOCHARO,RN,MM

LDRRMO II/ ACTING MDRRMO

NOTED BY :

Page 25 of 25