MWCL2004 Matrix
MWCL2004 Matrix
net/publication/3428680
CITATIONS READS
44 423
3 authors, including:
A. Lamecki
Gdansk University of Technology
110 PUBLICATIONS 1,390 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by A. Lamecki on 14 December 2012.
Abstract—This letter proposes a new quickly converging tech- of the coupling matrix and its principal sub-matrices. Also the
nique for the synthesis of coupling matrix of cross-coupled res- initial coupling matrix is synthesized in a tridiagonal form by
onator filters. The method formulates the synthesis as a nonlinear solving the Jacobi inverse eigenvalue problem [11].
least squares problem involving the zeroes and poles of short circuit
input and output admittances, as well as eigenvalues of the coupling
matrix and its principal sub-matrices. The solution is found via II. OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM
a damped Levenberg-Marquardt method with analytically com-
puted gradients. Numerical tests show that coupling matrices for To derive the cost function for the optimization procedure,
high order pseudo-elliptical filters can be found in surprisingly few we use network model with frequency independent couplings
optimization steps. considered in [8]. The starting point for our analysis are the short
Index Terms—Coupling matrix, eigenvalue problem, microwave circuit parameters of a two port network. Let us denote by
filters. the reciprocal coupling matrix. The short circuit output
admittance is related to the coupling matrix via
I. INTRODUCTION
Williams [1], [2] three decades ago, is still commonly used. Al- and column of the matrix and is identity
ternative synthesis techniques were advanced by Cameron [8], matrix. From the above equation it is seen that poles of are
[9] and other researchers [3], [4]. eigenvalues of matrix while zeros of are eigenvalues of
The theory of Atia and Williams uses the orthonormaliza- matrix , all multiplied by . A similar relation holds for the
tion technique to obtain the general coupling matrix with all short circuit input admittance except that zeros are related
possible cross couplings present and requires application of the to the eigenvalues of —the lower principal sub-matrix ob-
similarity transformations to reduce the number of nonzero el- tained by deleting the first row and column of matrix . The
ements in order to obtain a suitable form of the prototype. The rational functions corresponding to the short circuit admittance
main drawback of the method is that, in general, the series of matrix are readily obtained following the procedures described
rotations leading to required form of the matrix is not known in in [8].
advance. Recently, optimization techniques have been used to Rational functions are up to the scaling factor uniquely spec-
derive the sequence of transformations allowing annihilation of ified by the location of their poles and zeros. Let us denote by
the unwanted elements and provide the matrix with the required and the roots of polynomials in the numerator and
topology [7]. denominator of constructed using the polynomial synthesis
Optimization is also the cornerstone of several other recent technique of [8]. Assuming that the final network is symmet-
approaches to the coupling matrix synthesis [5], [6]. Here the rical , the coupling matrix synthesis problem can be
desired couplings are evaluated by minimizing a cost function seen as an optimization problems with the cost function defined
involving the values and at specially selected frequency as
points. The entries of the coupling matrix are used as the inde-
pendent variables. In this letter we describe a new approach to
the coupling matrix synthesis. In general, it resembles the tech-
nique proposed in [6] in that it employs a gradient-based op-
timization technique with analytically computed gradients and (1)
entries of the coupling matrix with selected coupling scheme where are the eigenvalues of the coupling matrix , are
(topology) regarded as independent variables. However, in our the eigenvalues of and are the eigenvalues of , all
method the cost function is constructed from the the eigenvalues multiplied by . Once the required coupling matrix has been
found, the resistance terminations and are determined
Manuscript received September 9, 2003; revised December 11, 2003. This applying the theory of Atia and Williams [1].
work was supported by the Polish State Committee for Scientific Research under
Contract 4T11D01924 and the Foundation for Polish Science under the Senior
Scholar Grants Program and the Grants for Young Scholars Program. A. Analytical Gradients
The authors are with Department of Electronics Informatics and Telecommu-
nications, The Technical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland. Cost function (1) defines a nonlinear least squares problem
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/LMWC.2004.827111 which can be solved by a specialized gradient based algorithm.
1531-1309/04$20.00 © 2004 IEEE
LAMECKI et al.: FAST SYNTHESIS OF COUPLED-RESONATOR FILTERS 175
To calculate gradients required by the algorithms one has to find Given the first vector the remaining vectors of matrix and the
exact sensitivities of eigenvalues to the elements of coupling elements on the main diagonal and first subdiagonals
matrix. This can be done by considering a perturbation of a sym- of the matrix are found as in [11]
metric matrix eigenvalue problem. Let denote a simple eigen-
value of matrix . For a small symmetric perturbation we
have
(2)
TABLE I
NUMERICAL RESULTS
Fig. 2. Frequency response of the 14th order extended box filter with
6 6
transmission zeros at ! = 1:05, 1.2, 1.4. 6
IV. CONCLUSION
A fast gradient based optimization technique for synthesis
of coupling matrix of resonator filters was proposed. The tech-
nique relies on the cost function involving zeroes and poles of
short circuit input and output admittances, as well as eigenvalues
of the coupling matrix and its principal sub-matrices. Numerical
tests show that even complex problems are solved within very
few iterations.
REFERENCES
[1] A. E. Atia and A. E. Williams, “Narrow-bandpass waveguide filters,”
IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-20, pp. 258–264, Apr.
1972.
[2] A. E. Atia, A. E. Williams, and R. W. Newcomb, “Narrow-band mul-
tiple-coupled cavity synthesis,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.,
vol. MTT-21, pp. 649–656, Sept. 1974.
[3] R. Levy, “Direct synthesis of cascaded quadruplet (CQ) filters,” IEEE
Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 43, pp. 2940–2945, Dec. 1995.
[4] D. S. G. Chambers and J. D. Rhodes, “A low-pass prototype network
allowing the placing of integrated poles at real frequencies,” IEEE Trans.
Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 83, pp. 40–45, Jan. 1983.
[5] W. A. Atia, K. A. Zaki, and A. E. Atia, “Synthesis of general topology
multiple coupled resonator filters by optimization,” in IEEE Microwave
Theory Tech. Dig., vol. 2, June 7–12, 1998, pp. 821–824.
[6] S. Amari, “Synthesis of cross-coupled resonator filters using an ana-
lytical gradient-based optimization technique,” IEEE Trans. Microwave
Theory Tech., vol. 48, pp. 1559–1564, Sept. 2000.
Fig. 1. Frequency response of the 14th order asymmetric filter with [7] G. Macchiarella, “Accurate synthesis of in-line prototype filters using
transmission zeros at ! = 1:03, 1.2. cascaded triplet and quadruplet sections,” IEEE Trans. Microwave
Theory Tech., vol. 50, pp. 1779–1783, July 2002.
[8] R. J. Cameron, “General coupling matrix synthesis methods for Cheby-
4 (the 8th order filter, zeroes at , in-line topology with shev filtering functions,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 47,
one quadruplet) to 27 (the 14th order filter, zeroes at , pp. 433–442, Apr. 1999.
[9] R. J. Cameron and J. D. Rhodes, “Asymmetric realizations for
1.2, 1.4, extended box filter). Slightly more iterations are dual-mode bandpass filters,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.,
required for asymmetric responses. For this case the number of vol. 29, pp. 51–59, Jan. 1981.
iterations was in the range 7 to 35, with the fastest convergence [10] R. J. Cameron, A. R. Harish, and C. J. Radcliffe, “Synthesis of advanced
microwave filters without diagonal cross-couplings,” IEEE Trans. Mi-
observed for a filter of 8th-order (one zero at , in-line crowave Theory Tech., vol. 50, pp. 2861–2872, Dec. 2002.
topology with one triplet) and the slowest for a filter of the 13th [11] M. T. Chu and G. H. Golub, Structured inverse eigenvalue problems, in
order (zeroes at , 1.1, 1.5, in-line topology with three Acta Numerica, vol. 11, pp. 1–71, 2002.
[12] H. B. Nielsen, “Damping Parameter in Marquardt’s Method,” Depart-
triplets). In all problems the iterations were interrupted as soon ment of Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark,
as the value of the cost function dropped below . Rep. IMM-REP-1999-05, 1999.