The Impact of Social Media On Student's Behavior Change in Higher Learning Institutions
The Impact of Social Media On Student's Behavior Change in Higher Learning Institutions
The Impact of Social Media On Student's Behavior Change in Higher Learning Institutions
MCS-133-317/2021
DECEMBER 2023
Table of Contents
1
DECLARATION ...................................................................................................................................................
5
DEDICATION ......................................................................................................................................................
6
ABSTRACT .........................................................................................................................................................
7
AKNOWLEDGEMENT.........................................................................................................................................
8
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ...........................................................................................................................
9
CHAPTER ONE .................................................................................................................................................
10
1.0 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................
10
1.1 Background of the study.......................................................................................................................
10
1.2 Problem Statement ...............................................................................................................................
11
1.3 Research Purpose .................................................................................................................................
12
1.4. General Objectives ...............................................................................................................................
12
1.4.1 Specific objectives..........................................................................................................................
12
1.5 Research Questions ..............................................................................................................................
13
1.6 Significance and Justification of the Study ...........................................................................................
13
1.7 Scope of the study................................................................................................................................ 14
1.8 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................
14
CHAPTER TWO ................................................................................................................................................
15 LITERATURE
REVIEW................................................................................................................................... 15
2
2.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................
15
2.1 Literature review ..................................................................................................................................
15
2.2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK................................................................................................................. 29
2.2.2 Assumptions of the Theory: ...........................................................................................................
29
2.3 Hypodermic Needle theory ...............................................................................................................
30
2.4 Technological Determinism Theory..................................................................................................
32
2.5 Klapper Reinforcement or Limited Effects Theory ...........................................................................
32
2.6 Relevance of the Theories to the Study ................................................................................................
33
CHAPTER THREE ..............................................................................................................................................
35 RESEARCH DESIGN AND
METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 35
3.0 Research Method ..................................................................................................................................
35
3.1 Research Design ....................................................................................................................................
35
3.2 Rationale for Choice of Methodology ...................................................................................................
35
3.3 Target Population .................................................................................................................................
36
3.4 Sampling Size and Techniques.............................................................................................................. 36
3.5 Data Collection......................................................................................................................................
37
3. 6 Sources of Data ....................................................................................................................................
37
3.7 Data Analysis and Presentation ............................................................................................................
38
3.8 Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments ..................................................................................
38
3
3.8.1: Validity ..........................................................................................................................................
38
3.8.2: Reliability...................................................................................................................................... 38
3.9 Ethical Considerations..........................................................................................................................
38
3.10 Limitations of the study ......................................................................................................................
40
CHAPTER FOUR...............................................................................................................................................
42 PRESENTATION OF
FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................... 42
4.0 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................
42
4.1 Response Rate...................................................................................................................................... 42
4.2 Gender of respondents .........................................................................................................................
42
4.4 Level of study of the
Respondents ....................................................................................................... 44
4.5 Respondents that use Social Media platforms as a source of
information .......................................... 45
4.6 Types of Social Media
used ................................................................................................................... 45
4.7 Respondents that prefer social media as a means of communication as opposed to traditional
Methods..................................................................................................................................................
46
4.8 The risks that come with the use of social media.............................................................................
47
4.9 Impact of social media on behavior changes among students.........................................................
48
4.10 Why students use social media instead of traditional methods ....................................................
49
4.11 Credibility of information received over social media platforms ...................................................
50
4.12 Influence of social media on the personal and professional development of the youth ...............
51
4
CHAPTER FIVE .................................................................................................................................................
51 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS..........................................................................................................................
51
5.0 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................
51
5.1 Summary of the study ...........................................................................................................................
52
5.2 Discussion of the findings .....................................................................................................................
52 CHAPTER
SIX ................................................................................................................................................... 55
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 55
5
DECLARATION
I Denis-Borges Mwenda, hereby declare that this research is my original work and has not been
submitted before for any academic award either in this or other institutions of higher learning in
this country for academic publication or any other purpose. The references used here from other
journals or materials are indicated in the references section.
6
DEDICATION
I wish to dedicate this work to my mother Margaret Chanda, my father Jimmy Nthala, my
sponsor’s starfish, CICA, Pastor Nick and Erica Lugg and my Sister Ruth Nthala whose moral and
financial support has remained unrelenting. My dear friend Musonda Zyambo who had been my
rock and steady support system throughout the entire process stopped believing in me and kept
pushing me to do my best, thank you God bless you all.
7
ABSTRACT
This research is aimed at finding out the impact that social media has on student’s behavior change.
The research methodology used is both qualitative and quantitative; the sample size is 60 university
students and the target population is 4 selected universities in Lusaka, the research design is the
descriptive survey design, probability sampling method is used and the data collected is from both
secondary and primary data Literature has shown that there exists a relationship between social
media and the impact it has on the behavior of students as it has been noted that, the young
generation is growing up having easier ways to stay connected with their loved ones and discover
new relationships, they are easily acquiring knowledge and live in a digital world and that some of
the online behaviors of students are categorized as risky but in the most cases they are not always
associated with negative impacts.
The findings show that majority of the respondents; access to gargets that connects them to these
social media platforms, they prefer social media as means of communication, they understand that
most of the information spread on these platforms is not credible and that these platforms can
impact their behavior negatively and positively depending on how they use them. It has been
concluded that social media continues to play a vital role on the behavior change of students, the
study has proved that social media has both positive and negative impact on students.
The researcher recommends that as the platforms continue to grow all stakeholders especially the
Zambia Information Communication and Technology Authorities should come up with ways of
filtering information that reaches these platforms. The researcher took an interest in this topic
because they noticed that it had become an obvious and usual sight to face not only students but
8
every adolescent being insensitive to a point where they chat in churches, homes when relatives
and guests are around, on the road, schools, during lectures and social gatherings wherein they are
so preoccupied and immersed into their phones that they do not even bother to look up as to where
they are or what is happening around them, which results in their inability to separate what is
important and what isn’t. Attention has therefore been shifted from real to the online world and
online friends.
AKNOWLEDGEMENT
The development of this research took the effort, support and guidance of a number of people
whom I wish to thank. First, I want to thank the Almighty God for bringing me this far and
keeping me sound and safe with good life during my four years of study.
I am grateful to my supervisor Mr. Beenwell Mwale for his invaluable guidance, supervisory
expertise, encouragement and support throughout the course of my study. I am also grateful to my
parents Margaret Chanda and Jimmy Nthala for the emotional and financial support that they gave
me throughout my years. This wouldn’t be complete without thanking my sister Ruth Nthala and
closest friends Musonda Zyambo, Wendy Chuulu and Rousseau Nanguzgambo whose moral
support has remained unrelenting. My dear friends and class mates for pushing me to do my best
and work harder, for helping me get out of my bubble your motivation kept me going thank you
Mass Com class of 2015.
I am also so grateful to my sponsors Starfish, CICA, Pastor Nick and Erica Lugg for their financial
support throughout my stud. I cannot end this list without paying tribute to the entire Cavendish
University Lecturers particularly those from the department of Mass Communication and Media
Studies for their constructive training and the knowledge they have imparted in me throughout the
four years of study. God bless you all abundantly.
9
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
TABLES
2 Table 4.8 Risks that come with the use of social media…………………………….. 36
4 Table 4.10 Why students prefer social media than traditional methods…………….. 38
FIGURES
1 Figure 4.5……………………………………………………………………………... 35
2 Figure 4.6……………………………………………………………………………... 35
3 Figure 4.7……………………………………………………………………………... 36
4 Figure 4.11……………………………………………………………………………. 39
10
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction
This chapter was focused on; the background of the study, statement of the problem and purpose of
study. It goes to further cover the objectives, research questions, significance and justification the
study and scope of the study. The chapter included the definition of key terms from the major
concepts under study
The research went further to define what is meant by social media and what these platforms are,
what their use in the lives of University are and there implications on their behavior, new
Information Technology (IT) is almost everywhere in the world and has dramatically changed the
way we live, their tools have become valued elements of life in for many simply because they have
opened many doors and allowed individuals to interact freely unlike at any other time in history.
Despite the unhealthy impact of social media many students are wrapped up in spending most of
their hours on social media sites which include the most popular Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp and
Instagram, social media has implanted negative images upon many minds however it has also made
a pathway to develop vital knowledge and social skills among students beyond their campus walls
(Wang, Chen and Liang, 2011). Social media equally positive or negative aspects but many
students are using these sites on a regular basis.
Institutes of higher learning all over the world have been hit by a new generation of students that
are coming straight from high school with knowledge about IT and how to go about using its tools,
especially smart phones and computers. Despite the fact that any type technology can either be put
to beneficial or non-beneficial use, depending on what the user chooses to do with, majority of the
parents in this country are buying smartphones and computers for their kids not to be used as a tool
of being unproductive but to be used for productive things like school work, research and staying in
touch with their friends and families.
The nature and classification of how people connect is different for each platform, for example on
Facebook on user has to send a friend request to the other user in order for them to stay connected,
on WhatsApp to stay connected they both need to have the mobile application on their phones and
have each other’s mobile numbers but as for Twitter and Instagram, only one user needs to follow
the other in-order to stay connected. Through social media, individuals can connect with people
from different ethnic groups and learn about their cultures and norms, the plus side is that these
platforms also helps them to maintain old friendships, besides establishing these types of
connections some social media platforms like LinkedIn helps one to find connections that will
create an opportunity for them to find a job and establish business contacts. Other platforms offer
features that allow them to design profiles that express and reflect their true selves and personality,
which gives them an opportunity to stand out from the rest of the users. It is therefore the aim of
this study to establish the impact that these social media has on the young individual‘s behavioral
change.
Technology has brought about social media which is seen as a very useful tool but sometimes it is
being misused. To have access to these platforms one needs a garget that can access the internet in
this case a phone, tablet or computer, this study went further to establish the impacts these
mediums have. Issues that were expected to arise out of this research included exposure to
pornographic materials, cyber bullying, and exposition to unnecessary online advertising, exposure
to dangerous online behaviors.
How has the usage of specific social media platforms influenced university students?
What factors are influencing information credibility that is being received via social media
platforms?
How do these social media platforms influence the personal and professional lives of the
youth?
Do the students prefer social media as a means of communication as opposed to traditional
methods?
How does social media impact behavior change in students?
What risks come with use of social media as a university student?
1.8 Methodology
The survey method was used to solicit data and information from a sample of randomly picked
individuals. 60 participants were selected. The researcher designed a questionnaire to collect data.
Key Terms: Information Technology (IT), Social media platforms; Facebook; Twitter; WhatsApp;
Internet.
15
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 INTRODUCTION
In this section, the study reviewed concepts and theories relating to the problem of study. It
examined available literature which other authors have written about the problem of study. It went
on to cover literature from global perspective, Africa and then Zambia. The literature was be
reviewed and presented thematically according to research objectives.
Tap Scott suggested that the main characteristics of the N-Gen culture were; independence,
emotional and intellectual openness, inclusion, free expressing and strong views, innovative,
preoccupation with maturity, pleasure by the investigation, immediacy, and sensitivity to corporate
interest, authentication, and trust, this study was based on a theoretical approach that considers
students as active agents who can manipulate, adapt, create, and disseminate ideas and products
through communication technologies (Berson and Berson, 2005). According to Tap Scott (1998),
the digital literacy possessed by students, has given power to them in their relations with adults as
well as independence in the world, technological modern developments have contributed to the
16
democratization of the family, especially in countries that are pioneers in Information
Communication Technologies (ICT.) The domestication of media used by students can be seen
across diverse individuals versus socially stratified culture, and nationally versus global identities
and community (Livingstone and Bobber, 2005).
The anxieties about the friendless nature of new media use are well-known by worries about lost
community traditions and values (Livingstone & Bober, 2005). The simple use of internet cannot
predict risk (Enhancing Child Safety & Online Technologies, 2008 for Internet & Society at
Harvard University, 2008). From the development perspective, it can be argued in relation to the
use of the internet by students that the numerous physical participations are demanding on thinking
resources and can overwhelm their capacity to engage in thoughtful decision making (Berson and
Berson, 2005). Looking at this from Berson and Berson’s perspective they tried to look looked at
how when as children one cannot realize or be aware of certain risks and we require adult
supervision as we go through the stages heading to adulthood there are still some choices that we
make that are still under development. In fact, students have especially been often considered as
vulnerable to risky behaviors like the consumption of drugs or alcohol.
However, some of the online behaviors by students categorized as risky behaviors should be better
categorized as online challenging behaviors, since these online behaviors are commonly practiced
by students of today and in the most cases these behaviors are not always associated with negative
consequences, many of these behaviors are encouraged or reinforced by the very structural
characteristics of the virtual space, and sometimes the manifestation of certain behaviors is
necessary in order to participate with others in cyberspace and enjoy the full benefits of online
applications (i.e., publish photos in social networks, chat, interact or build associations or groups
with strangers). Social media has an impact on students in various ways. For instance, with regard
to exposure to obscene materials, the Internet has changed the way the consumption of
pornography takes place, people have greater possibility to access pornography through their own
initiative or accidentally.
Research has revealed that 57% of social media users have come into contact with online
pornography, their encounters with pornography happened in different ways; the most common
was in pop-up advert, open porn site accidentally when clicking on what they want and another
17
window opens up instead. Also 22% of the daily and weekly users have accidentally ended up on a
site with violent or gruesome pictures and 9% on a site that is hostile or hateful to a group of people
(Livingstone and Bober, 2005). Additionally, a survey of risk, impact and prevention found that
using the internet all the time, taking risks online, going to chat rooms, and using other people’s
phones or computers are the most predictive behaviors associated with exposure to sexual material
on the internet. In addition, exposition to advertising and consumption of virtual items is also on
the rise. Hence, we find that every social media users are in constant exposure to obscene materials
when they just log on to the internet.
Over the past two decades, social media has gained so much popularity worldwide to the point
where many researchers have become interested in learning a bit more about these platforms and
what effects they have on their communities. Despite the fact that almost everyone is connected to
at least one type of social media platform, students are the ones leading and are the most funs of
social media to a point that they use these platforms in class or even in church, it is to this light that
researchers have found that these social sites impact or influence the lives of students in society at a
great deal in terms of morals, behavior, and even education wise. These platforms have held an
addiction wherein they find it difficult to concentrate on their work and prefer logging in and
jumping across one site to another. Some have derived benefit out of these platforms whereas some
have become academically challenged by the use of these websites, other individuals have set their
own limits as to when and when not to access these websites but very few out of the lot are
witnessed to not access or make use of the platforms at all, these platforms have also brought about
online sexual victimization not only on students but every user.
The Youth Internet Safety Survey, conducted by Crimes Against Children Research Center at the
University of New Hampshire interviewed 1,501 individuals aged 10 to 17 years that frequently use
the internet and found that the 19% of them have received an unwanted sexual solicitation via the
internet of which 77% were 14 years or older. Only 24% of these told a parent about the
solicitation, 29% told a peer; and 75% of them were not worried by the sexual online solicitation,
as a result, harassment among peers has become unlimited thanks to the easy access to the modern
technologies, things like bullying has occurred in a new territory, online (Li, 2006). This
technology has also resulted in the development of dangerous online behavior. Thus, not only the
exhibition to unwanted material has been considered as a serious risk, but also the participation and
18
the facility to become a member of controversial groups. Some students may identify strongly with
this sort of material and they may feel validated and encouraged to practice it (Wolak, et al., 2003).
According to Ybarra et al., (2007) engaging in online risky behavior takes place while an individual
is using the internet with friends or peers 40%, other forms of dangerous online behavior include
bullying. Studies have often found an overlap between cyber bullying offenders and victims.
Although, it is recognized that adults bulled minors, it is not precisely known how common it is
(Wolak et al, 2006). Other studies point out that minors are usually harassed by people of their
same age (Hinduja and Patchin, 2009 in Enhancing Child Safety & Online Technologies, 2008 for
Internet & Society at Harvard). It is obvious that social media has led to increased online
socialization among students, and such connections have paved a way for establishing new
relationships and strengthening old ones. Chats, forums, web pages and the most recent web 2.0
technologies allow people to interchange information and socialize in very creative ways.
Evaluating the amount of research that surrounds the usage of social media in the education system,
it is important to determine whether or not, have these platforms lead to any impact on student
engagement and achievement. This paper will therefore be able to review the available literature to
study and present both the positive and negative impacts of social media on students. The
researcher tried to portray, social media platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram are
gaining popularity with the pace of time and due to their attractive features students are fascinated
towards them.
Scholar Andrew L. Shapiro (1999) argued that with these new digital technologies signals a
potentially major shift of who is in control of information, experience and resources (Shapiro cited
19
in Croteau and Hoynes 2003). W. Russell Neuman (1991) suggested that whilst the new media
have technical capabilities to pull in one direction, economic and social forces pull back in the
opposite direction. According to Neuman, “We are witnessing the evolution of a universal
interconnected network of audio, video, and electronic text communications that will blur the
distinction between interpersonal and mass communication and between public and private
communication” (Neuman cited in Croteau and Hoynes 2003).
20
2.1.4 Use of Social Media
In 2006, Bryant, Sanders-Jackson, and Smallwood reported that the main findings related to
student’s use of media plat forms were:
Students are using social media platforms to improve communication among friends and
family, to make plans with one another and to maintain social contact outside their day-
today, face to-face interactions.
These platforms are being adopted by them quiet quickly because they are more convenient,
less expensive and faster than traditional forms of communication.
Research in this field has shown that although preference for using social media platforms
to communicate is definitely on the rise, the use of these platforms have surpassed that of
email, although some students still tend to hold in-depth, important conversations offline.
As defined by Boyd and Ellison (2007), social network sites are web-based services that allow
individuals to:
The nature and jargon of these connections may vary from site to site. These researchers go on to
emphasize that while the terms "social network site" and "social networking sites" often are used
interchangeably, they differ in emphasis and scope. They stress that: social network emphasizes
relationship initiation, often between strangers, while social networking is possible on these sites, it
is not the primary practice on many of them, nor is it what differentiates them from other forms of
computer-mediated communication. What makes social network sites unique is not that they allow
individuals to meet strangers, but rather that they enable users to be expressive and make visible
21
their social networks. This can result in connections between individuals that would not otherwise
be made, but that is often not the goal. On many of the large social network sites, participants are
not necessarily networking or looking to meet new people; instead, they are primarily
communicating with people who are already a part of their extended social network. An example of
social networking sites is Facebook and an example of a social network site is WhatsApp.
Social media has given students Avenue and opportunity to make new friends and also maintain old
friendships, with social media they can trace their former friends by simply typing their names or
indicating the school they attended, then the network will do its job and link them to all the people
they went to school with or the town they grew up together in. Apart from socializing, social media
has become the frontier for corporate world to advertise their goods and services, which offers
opportunities for students to be hired by the corporations, but it depends on the following that they
have on social media; they are offered the opportunity to become brand ambassadors online. In
addition they can earn a considerable amount of money by running podcasts and vlogs (video
blogs). Social media is also an avenue where they can showcase their talents, for instant all these
new comedians that are coming up in Zambia, they use their social media accounts to make videos
of them cracking jokes and they grow a following, which then starts presenting them with
opportunities to host events as masters of ceremony at events. A good example of creating an
online presence that has brought opportunities for students in Zambia is a Copperbelt University
22
(CBU) student who was using his account to advertise his goods in a funny but eye catching way
that would make one believe that the goods he was selling could actually do what he was saying
they would, companies saw his talent for advertising and decided to hire him. Therefore this shows
that the students can run their businesses through social media and get a wider coverage. On the
negative side social media is an unregulated world that has no form of morals or laws to abide to;
users are exposed to uncensored material which when consumed for a long time can lead to serious
mental breakdowns.
Too much social media can also lead to addiction; the world today is filled with individuals who
can seat next to each other but not talking but just staring at their phones. Students are spending
more time on social media than doing school work, house work or any productive activities. In a
bid to get famous they are engaging in activities that might affect their future, by making
inappropriate videos or taking provocative pictures which only end up exposing themselves to
predators. These social platforms are risky and dangerous, most people on social media are fake in
both their personas and personal information, which has even made it easy for crimes like cyber
bullying, while most people may argue that it is not a serious crime and young people are just
having fun, the truth of the matter remains that some if not most people get affected.
Furthermore, it is very easy to trace anyone using their social media information, such as location,
school they attended and place of work. Social media has taken away empathy, when people are
getting into trouble instead of helping they record their misfortune and post the footage on social
media just to get views. Albert Einstein once said, “I fear the day that technology will surpass our
human interaction, the world will have a generation of idiots.” Social media is a great way to pass
time and see what is happening around the world, it may be interesting but also addictive. Social
media has proved to have both positive and negative effects, individuals should make conclusions
whether to go on using the platforms or stop or even moderate their usage.
In recent years, new communication technology and the rise of the internet have opened up a new
scene of information dissemination that has never been experienced before. It, especially the
internet, has penetrated people’s daily lives in ways that before were unimaginable. The growth of
the internet since the 1980’s has been faster than the growth of any other communication medium
(Fogg et al, 2001). The emergence of a new medium often affects existing media (Liu, 2003) in
several ways such as audience base, credibility and production process.
Social media provides a different medium that allows individuals to express themselves freely and
comment on what is happening around them unlike the limited access that is provided by the main
stream media like Television, radio and newspapers, where freedom of expression is limited and
what type of information that is shared with the public have to be held by government or the owner
of the media house’s standards. The new media have transformed people from being passive and at
the receiving end of one way mass communication to becoming producers and transmitters of
information (Creeber and Martin, 2009; Bennett, 2003). With this perception, social media and the
news media have assumed great importance and popularity in the society as people are free to
create their own news comment on issues and get the other side of a story (Rosenstiel, 2005).
As the new media platforms assume an important source of information dissemination and
expression of opinion, the level to which people place trust and credibility in both the mainstream
media and the news media becomes an issue of concern and investigation. Gangadharbatla, in his
study on social media using a survey method that concluded young adults were more likely to
obtain their news information from social media more so than from the traditional media sources
(Gangadharbatla, 2012). Johnson and Kaye in their study of the usage of the internet for political
information by individuals found that online media are more highly credible than traditional media
(Johnson and Kaye, 1998). However, concerns and skepticism have been raised on the credibility
of social media and online news content because of the questions of professionalism, anonymity of
sender location, etc. (Hilingoss and Rieh, 2008; Fogg,2003; Kiousis, 2001).
24
Another factor in the discussion of the credibility of news on social media is whether the definition
of what is news on the mainstream media is the same as the concept of news on the social media.
Also, does the news pass through the gatekeeping/ filtering process as that of the mainstream media
and if it does, is there any platform of attributing the source of news to a particular person? Social
media provides first-hand information but one pressing problem is distinguishing factual
information from rumors, in many cases it has been found that most information on social media is
user generated which in turn can make it biased, inaccurate, and subjective. Social media are
increasingly used as an information source, including information about risks and crises happening
around the world and in a given country. Current studies have examined how pieces of information
available in social media impact perception of sources of credibility.
Information on social media platforms suffer a relative lack of professional gatekeeping to monitor
content, how to go about evaluating the credibility of the information spread on social media
platforms has become an important issue for information consumers. How to identify credible
information on social media has proved to be a challenge, because information spreads faster on
social media than any other form of media. Social media have often been doubted as a credible
source of information as there is no clear or “legitimate” gatekeeping process for content
production and information sharing. When individual users rely more on a specific medium for
information, they consider it to be more credible than other media (Flanagin & Metzger, 2000;
Johnson & Kaye, 1998; Kiousis, 2001).
25
These characteristics may encourage intimate self-disclosure, because intimate self-disclosure is an
important predictor of reciprocal liking, caring, and trust, use Internet-enhanced intimate
selfdisclosure may be responsible for a potential increase in the quality of adolescent’s friendships.
And Lee (2009) reports that those who had established strong social relationships at earlier ages
were more likely to use online communication, which in turn predicted more cohesive friendships
and better connectedness to school. Notley (2009) stresses that it is clear from the research that
participants online network use provided them with opportunities to participate in society in ways
that were social, economic, cultural, civic, and educational. In this way online network use had
supported all of the participant’s social inclusion. Hundley and Shyles (2010) conclude that, In
terms of socializing and staying connected with peers with digital devices, particularly social
network sites, a large friend list is a pride object with many teenagers the number of people on their
friend list equates to popularity and perceptions of likeability.
There are dangers associated with social networking, like data theft, which are on the rise. The
most prevalent danger though often involves online predators or individuals who claim to be
someone that they are not. From an article online (What is social networking) a range of concerns
were discussed about young people’s use of social network sites and mobile phones. And, of
course, concerns are intensified because of the tendencies they have for exploration and risk-taking.
The most prominently discussed concerns all revolve around personal risks such as:
Texting and driving – this is a common trend amongst university students who are driving
which is one of the riskiest behaviors as it increases the risks of accidents.
26
Cyber bullying and Harassment – cyber bullying is one of the most overlooked
disadvantage of social media in Zambia, individuals take it likely as a sign of people just
having fun, it has gotten to a point were some pages on Facebook secretly promote it as a
fun way of interacting with its followers by making fun of other people’s insecurities for
example a page on Facebook called “best couples in Zambia” allows its audiences to send
them pictures of them and their significant others and allows the followers of the page to
comment hurtful comments in the comment section, they most times deliberately get
random pictures of people out of Zambia just to keep the page running with comments.
Frauds and Scums – people tend to make fake profiles or IDs on social media platforms to
sell or provide different services, when they get the money from unaware individuals they
deactivate their social media accounts and disappear.
Waste of time on social media – students tend to waste time on social media without even
realizing that they have wasted an entire day chatting and jumping from one social media
platform to the next, according to my findings most students are more affected by this
disadvantage of social media, as they are using social media all the time be it during exam
periods and lectures.
Spend less time with family and friends – this is one of the most adverse effects of social
media on society, most people are always connected to social media using their smart
phones or tablets. At family gatherings they mostly just take pictures to share on social
media platforms than actually spend time with loved ones and enjoy it.
Depression – social media risks depression, social media platforms is the type of media
where different individuals with different backgrounds and lives come together to create a
big online community but the life styles of most people are different, in order to be on the
same level as their other peers some students resort to creating a fake online presence in a
bid to fit in, whilst their real lives do not match up to their fake online life which causes
depression and a low self-esteem.
Effects on sleep routine – social media also contributes to lack of sleep, most people use
social media in the night when it’s time to sleep, they use their devices whilst the lights are
off which affects and damages sleep hormones and end up causing sleeping problems
which would result in having less concentration the next day.
27
In addition to the above, lecturers and teachers are raising concerns about a negative impact on
writing skills. Students are integrating texting or instant messaging lingo into school work. More
generally, schools are in a waver about how to control use of cell phones and texting during school
hours and how to counter their use as a device to aid cheating. Concerns, of course, often are in the
eye of the beholder. That is, actor and observer have different perceptions.
Development of discussions – social media plays a very important role in the development
of discussion, there are a lot of groups and pages related to different things that one is
interested in and begin a discussion on a topic at hand, social media is by far the best
platform for developing discussions. It allows one to gain knowledge and different
perspective on an issue.
Entertainment – it’s no secret students use social media mostly for entertainment; social
media has been dabbed as the best source of entertainment.
Job search – there are a lot of pages and groups on social media platforms like Facebook
and LinkedIn that are dedicated to posting about job openings, this has made it easier for
individuals to find and jobs and not go from company to company to seek employment.
Awareness creation – social media is used to create awareness about something is largely
overlooked in the community, to educate users of the importance of the issue.
Source of information and updates – this is the main advantage of social media not only
for students but every social media user as it helps them to stay updated on what is
happening in the world and around them, it is considered as the best source for latest
information and updates, one no longer has to wait for the newspaper to come out tomorrow
or for the broadcast media to run it. Social media gives individuals the possibility to send
and receive information, it provides the messaging facilities by which people can
communicate and update each other on what is going on in each of their lives.
Use as a Helper – this means that social media can be used by people to get help from
different people, for example if someone is struggling with a certain problem they can post
it on social media anonymously and get the help or solution they need, this can either be a
relationship problem or health problem. It can also be used to assist someone to get a job or
28
funding they are looking for by simply asking people on their timeline to share on their
timeline what they are looking for to get to the right person they want that information to
reach an example of this is; someone does a painting of a famous person and they want that
person to see it they simply ask their friends to share the painting on their timeline in the
hope that one of those friends has a connection to that famous person. In short one can share
their issue with the community to get help, whether it is helping in terms of money or
advice, one can get it from the community they are connected to.
Connectivity – social media allows people from anywhere in the world regardless of
location and religion, the beauty of it is that it can connect with anyone to and share
thoughts.
Promotion of social change – students can use social media to launch numerous
campaigns that can call their peers to pressure government and business to become fair, like
exposing corruption, improving facilities in their locations and fighting against gender
stereotypes.
Use for Enhancing Learning and Psychosocial Development – many schools and
colleges are embracing social network sites and other internet and computer tools to
enhance instruction, collaboration, and professional development (Davis, 2010; Ito, Horst,
Bittanti, Boyd, Herr-Stephenson, Lange, Pascow, & Robinson, 2008; Patchin and Hinduja,
2010; SafeTeens.com). Educational institutions are using social network sites to create
chatroom forums and groups to discuss and clarify, provide a range of extra supports for
learning, and facilitate communication with families (especially those for whom face-toface
meetings are difficult). Some schools are using smartphones to enable students to instant-
message peers and teachers with questions related to homework and to clarify difficult
material.
Social interactions through technology also can be an aid for students and families who are shy or
overly anxious in social situations (Pierce, 2009). More generally, social media may be of use in
enhancing relationships between teachers and students (Mazer, Murphy, Simonds, 2007). With
respect to psychosocial development, researchers have suggested that participation on social media
platforms influences such matters as identity formation and social skill development. A recent
29
study suggests such participation may have positive effects with respect to how individuals cope
with emotional distress such as grieving following someone‘s death (Williams & Merten, 2009).
For older students preparing for the workplace, the sites offer opportunities to enhance technical
skills and enable networking with professionals for internship and job opportunities. Moreover, a
recent study suggests a relationship between use of Facebook and staying in school (Morris, Reese,
Beck, & Mattis, 2010). And school professionals are creating learning communities and
communities of practice for sharing and continuing education (e.g. educational blogs, e-portfolios,
formal and, chats, discussion threads.). For teachers/lecturers, social media sites are another avenue
to open the classroom door and end the traditional isolation (and often alienation) many experience.
It characterizes people as active and motivated in selecting the media they choose to
consume.
It relies on two principles; media users are active in their selection of the media they
consume, and they are very much aware of their reasons for selecting the different media
options.
The greater control and choice brought about by the new media has opened up new avenues
of this theory, research has led to new discovery of new gratifications, especially in regards
to social media
30
The media compete with other resources for need satisfaction
People have enough self-awareness of their media use, interests, and motives to be able to
provide researchers with an accurate picture of that use.
Value judgments of media content can only be assessed by the audience.
New Media Examples of UGT: The application of New Media to the Uses and Gratifications
Theory has been positive. The introduction of the Internet, social media and technological advances
has provided another outlet for people to use and seek gratification through those sources. Based on
the models developed by Katz, Blumler, Gurevitch and Lasswell, individuals can choose to seek
out media in one outlet, all falling within the forbidden categories of need. The only difference
now, is that the audience does not have to go to multiple media outlets to fulfill each of their needs.
2.3.1 Concept
The "Magic Bullet" or "Hypodermic Needle Theory" of direct influence effects was not as widely
accepted by scholars as indicated. The magic bullet theory was not based on empirical findings
from research but rather on assumptions of the time about human nature. People were assumed to
be "uniformly controlled by their biologically based 'instincts' and those they react more or less
uniformly to whatever 'stimuli' came along" (Lowery & De Fleur, 1995). The "Magic Bullet"
31
theory assumes that the media's message is a bullet fired from the "media gun" into the viewer's
"head" (Berger 1995). Similarly, the "Hypodermic Needle Model" suggests that the media injects
its messages straight into the passive audience (Croteau, Hoynes 1997). This passive audience is
immediately affected by these messages. The public essentially cannot escape from the media's
influence, and is therefore considered a "sitting duck" (Croteau, Hoynes 1997). Both models
suggest that the public is vulnerable to the messages shot at them because of the limited
communication tools and the studies of the media's effects on the masses at the time (Davis, Baron
1981).
These new findings also suggested that the public can select which messages affect and don't affect
them. Lazarsfeld’s debunking of these models of communication provided the way for new ideas
regarding the media’s effects on the public. Lazarsfeld introduced the idea of the two step flow
model of communication in 1944. Elihu Katz contributed to the model in 1955 through studies and
publications (Katz, Lazarsfeld 1955). The two step flow model assumes that ideas flow from the
mass media to opinion leaders and then to the greater public (Katz, Lazarsfeld 1955). They
believed the message of the media to be transferred to the masses via this opinion leadership.
Opinion leaders are categorized as individuals with the best understanding of media content and the
most accessibility to the media as well. These leaders essentially take in the media's information,
and explain and spread the media’s messages to others (Katz, 1957). Thus, the two step flow model
and other communication theories suggest that the media does not directly have an influence on
viewers anymore. Instead, interpersonal connections and even selective exposure play a larger role
in influencing the public in the modern age (Severin, Tankard 1979).
32
2.4 Technological Determinism Theory
Technological Determinism state that media technology shapes how we as individuals in a society
think, feel, act, and how the society operates as we move from one technological age to another
(Tribal- Literate- Print- Electronic- Social media).
2.4.1 Concept
The theory was developed by Marshall Mcluhan in 1962.It explains that individuals learn and feel
and think the way we do because of the messages they receive through the current technology that
is available. The radio which was the example used required people to listen and develop a sense of
hearing. Television engages both hearing and visual senses. We then transfer those developed
senses into our everyday lives and we want to use them again. The medium is then our message.
Social media brought about by emerging technology requires people to listen and engaged often.
People then interpret the messages sent to them from social media in their everyday life.
Humans do not have much free will at all. Whatever society as a whole is using to communicate,
they too will use to communicate. Therefore they will adapt to the medium they are using so that
they can send and receive messages like everyone else. We know that there is one truth by
observing what has happened over time. As the medium changes so does society's way of
communicating. People can only use the medium for which it was created (phone for talking over
lines or electronic mail for talking via computer). If the medium is impersonal (mobile phone) then
the message too is impersonal. This theory is objective in that everyone will act and feel the same
no matter what the medium they are using provided that they are using the same medium. Values
are not involved because evidence is seen strictly through observation.
The theory explains that when new systems of technology are developed, the culture or society is
immediately changed to reflect the senses needed to use the new technology. The theory predicts
that with every new system of media technology, society will change and adapt to that technology.
It explains that there is a simple cause and effect analysis between the introduction of new
technology and the changes in society's way of thinking, feeling, acting, or believing.
2.6.1 Concept
His theory is often referred to now as reinforcement theory because a key assertion is that the
primary influence of media is to reinforce (not change) existing attitudes and behaviors. Instead of
disrupting society and creating unexpected social change, media generally serve as agents of the
status quo, giving people more reasons to go on believing and acting as they already do. He argued
that there simply are too many barriers to media influence for drastic changes to occur except under
very unusual circumstances.
Klapper‘s theory insists that ordinarily media does not serve as a necessary and sufficient cause of
audience effects, but rather functions among and through a link of mediating factors and influences.
He also explains that these mediating factors are such that they typically render mass
communication a contributory agent, but not as the sole cause in a process of reinforcing the
existing conditions. Regardless of the condition in question and regardless of whether the effect in
question, be social or individual, the media are more likely to reinforce than to change.
Klapper‘s theory also assumes that mass communication does function in the service of change;
one of the two following conditions is likely to exist. The mediating factors he says will be found to
be inoperative and the effect of the media will be found to be direct; or the mediating factors, which
normally favor reinforcement, will be found to be impelling toward change. Klapper did not
exclude that media could have direct effects on audience. There are certain residual situations in
which mass communication seems to produce direct effects, or directly and of itself to serve certain
psychophysical functions.
34
happened. The theories explain the simple cause and effect analysis between the introduction of
new technology and the changes in the student's way of thinking, feeling, acting, or believing.
As just one example, concerns about digital media as cultural heritage, and the need to keep legal
and social records into the future, may compel more scholars to study the collection, preservation,
restoration, and access to new media archives, just as we do for books, audio recordings, films, and
other documents. These processes involve both individual action and institutional resources, and to
study them properly we must expand our theoretical and methodological repertoires.
35
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
Included in the section was to give a description of the following components in the context of the
study setting of this research proposal such as; the research design, data collection constituting of
sources of data, the sampling plan, data collection tools, the sample size, data analysis and ethical
consideration.
36
and perceptions. Hence, within this context, the choice of qualitative research was particularly
important for this investigation as it attempted to explore a relatively unknown area of study.
This rationale is confirmed by Denscombe (2003), when he states that qualitative research should
be favored when a topic of interest has been relatively ignored in the literature or has been given
superficial attention. Moreover, the generation of descriptions, generalizations, themes and
relationships from the data in the study could possibly contribute towards the policy development
in the educational sector especially in the universities.
37
3.5 Data Collection
There are numerous ways of collecting data and these depend on the purpose and aims of the
research. In this study data was collected by means of questionnaires and interviews. Data
collection involved contacting the members of the population was sampled so as to collect the
required information about the study. The researcher employed the services of research assistants
who were given a time frame for collection of the data for analysis.
3. 6 Sources of Data
The study decided to use both primary and secondary sources of data to be utilized in this study.
Primary data is data that is gathered from interviews, questionnaire, observations, survey and other
direct observations which is from the respondent(s). In this study primary data were tailored to the
questions to produce the data to help in the study. The Primary data was sourced to provide fresh
and up to date information about the study.
The purpose of collecting secondary data was to compare what the previous studies on the topic
discovered thereby comparing and contrasting them with the primary data. Both primary and
secondary data have their pros and cons. Primary data offers tailored information though it takes a
much longer time to process. Secondary data on the other hand is usually inexpensive to obtain and
can be analyzed easily because it was already gathered for other purposes.
3.8.2: Reliability
To test the reliability of research instruments used, test and re-test techniques were be used. The
reliability of the questionnaire were computed using SPSS to determine Cronbach‘s reliability
coefficient. A correlation coefficient greater or equal to 5 was treated as being acceptable (Fraser et
al., 2012).
39
research that was going to be sacrificed. Ethical issues that were put into consideration in this
research include among others: seeking consent, maintaining confidentiality, avoiding causing
harm to participants, and avoiding biasness.
Seeking Informed Consent: In accomplishing this research ethic, participants were informed
beforehand on what the research was all about and what was involved so that they could decide in a
conscious and deliberate way whether they wanted to participate in the research or not. “This
implies that potential participants, no matter how suitable, are not obliged to participate in the study
but informing them will ensure that information is collected only from people that are willing to
participate”. This also helped in ensuring that valid data was collected.
Maintaining Confidentiality: There is need to draw a boundary between probing and infringing
on participants’ privacy since qualitative research by nature, involves a close relationship between
the researcher and the researched. To maintain confidentiality, the researcher attempted not to
review the information collected from the respondents to any other people. The researcher made it
clear to the participants that information collected from them was purely for academic purposes and
that anonymity was be created. Furthermore, the researcher avoided interviewing participants from
public places when dealing with personal issues. The questionnaires were formulated in such a way
that there was no need for participants to write their names.
Avoiding Causing Harm to Participants: It is unfortunate to note that some research methods
may cause harm to research participants. In this study therefore, it was the responsibility of the
researcher to ensure that whatever research methodology was adopted did not cause harm to the
participants in any way such as invasion of privacy, harassment, anxiety, and discomfort among
others.
Avoiding biasness: In the carrying out of this research, the researcher at all cost avoided
discriminating against participants by choosing those that they liked because the findings of such a
study would not reflect the real situation on the ground.
The researcher was not looking out only for those people that are readily available or those that
could easily be manipulated. It was therefore always important that participants were selected
40
using scientific methodology. There was also need to ensure that the findings from the research
were reported objectively.
Understanding: It was ensured that participants understood what was been explained and were
given the opportunity to ask questions and have them answered by the researcher. The informed
consent document was written in lay language, avoiding any technical jargon. In this regard, the
researcher ensured that this rule was abided by.
Voluntariness: The researcher ensured that participant's consent to participate in the research was
voluntary, free of any pressure or promises of benefits unlikely to result from participation
41
CHAPTER FOUR
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS
4.0 Introduction
This chapter contains results and presentations of the findings. The study targeted students from
four universities namely: University of Zambia (UNZA), University of Lusaka (UNILAS), Chreso
University and Cavendish University (CUZ). Questionnaires and an interview schedule were
administered to collect data in the sampled universities. The study was aimed at establishing the
42
impact of social media on student’s behavior in universities. In analysis, data from questionnaires
was coded and analyzed into quantitative summary reports using the statistical package for social
sciences (SPSS) version 20. Data was keyed into the program under specific category from which
analysis was run to obtain descriptive statistics in the form of frequencies and percentages. SPSS
was used to arrive at reliability among multiple measures of variables of the study. Simple pie
charts, bar graphs and frequency distribution tables were used in presenting data where
interpretations and conclusions were made.
43
Sex of respondents
40%
Females
Males
60%
Ages of respondents
6% 4%
18-22
31%
22-26
59%
26-30
30-35
Yes 92%
45
Source: Field Data (2019)
As shown in the figure above, 55 representing 92% of the total respondents agreed to the fact that
they used social media as a source of information, while 5 representing 8% of the total respondents
said that they did not use social media as a source of information.
75%
17%
8%
46
traditional methods
One of the objectives of the study was to determine whether students in universities prefer social
media as a means of communication as opposed to traditional methods. The following figure shows
the results:
Figure 4.7: Students that prefer Social Media over traditional methods
83%
17%
Yes No
4.8 The risks that come with the use of social media
Table 4.8: The risks that come with the use of social media
47
Physically antisocial 45 75%
48
Improves on the confidence
55 92%
Improves on social skills
10 17%
Increased their knowledge 10 17%
49
Feel independent 30 50%
11%
14%
Notcredible
Credible
75% It depends
50
Figure 4.11 above shows that 75% of the respondents said that the information circulated on Social
Media was not very credible, 14% of the respondents said they found the information circulated on
social media to be very credible. 11% of the total number of respondents said they found that the
information that usually circulates on social media is somewhat credible.
4.12 Influence of social media on the personal and professional development of the youth
Table 4.12: Influence of social media on the personal and professional development
Impact Frequency Percentage
Social networks help them to 30 50%
maintain contacts with old
friends and create new friends
Table 4.12 indicates that 50% agreed to a large extent that social media has helped them to
maintain contacts with old friends and create new friends. 25% agreed to large extent that social
media have made planning easier, just needed to post in their wall any event and all their friends
can view and decide to attend or not to, 50% said social media had saved them on travelling costs
to see family and friends, they could just video call them, 75% said that internet had made things
easier for them at school since they got their assignments via SMS and after doing them, they send
via e-mail, 17% said that to a large extent social media has reduced their cost of keeping in touch
with their loved ones.
51
CHAPTER FIVE
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
5.0 Introduction
The study sought to investigate impact of social media among the youth on behavior change: a case
study of university students in selected universities in Lusaka, Zambia. This chapter presents a
summary of the findings of the study. The chapter further offers a summary on the data collected,
analysis of data, discussions of the findings on each research question and the logical interpretation
emanating from the findings.
54
CHAPTER SIX
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.0 INTRODUCTION
The study was aimed at finding out what impact social media has on the behavior change of
students in universities in Lusaka Zambia, it sought to seek out if social media had any influence to
the way they behave or carry themselves. This chapter looks at the conclusion of this study,
recommendations that were derived from the study and finally, the suggestions that have been
made for further study.
6.1 CONCLUSION
In view of the summary in chapter 5, it was evident that social media played a major role on
behavior change of the respondents. Students mostly used social media for communicating between
their friends and families. The fact that social media is part of them especially having been born in
this era of emerging technology, most felt that they could not do without it. They depended on it for
various positive things such as research and contacts with old friends and getting on the loop of
what was happening either in their circles, nationally or internationally. In conclusion the study
proved that social media has both a positive and negative impact on students.
6.2 Recommendations
i. As social media continues to grow and be part of our daily lives, authorities need to come
up with a way that can educate and train the students on the better usage of social media so
as to minimize time wastage on chatting and other irrelevant engagements that are not of
major importance on their lives.
ii. All the stakeholders and especially ZICTA and network providers need to come up with
means of filtering information that reaches the young people through social media
platforms. This will help minimize exposing them to pornographic and other unwarranted
materials.
iii. Parents should educate their children about sex to avoid them learning about it from their
peers online and should be open to discuss and answer any required questions.
iv. In order to communicate effectively to the young people schools and government agencies
should adopt social media as one of their means of communication.
v. To avoid having a generation that does not have face to face communication skills, all the
stakeholders should consider organizing social events that the young people will use to
interact and mingle with each other physically.
55
6.3 Suggestions for further research
i. Since the study targeted on the general social media, a study can be done further on the
specific social media platform, such as Facebook or WhatsApp.
ii. While the study recognized that social media has impacts on other young people outside
university students, and as such this study limited itself only to students in selected
universities. Therefore, a similar study can be done on young people outside of the
university student’s bracket.
iii. The study focused itself only on four universities that are based around Lusaka, as opposed
to other institutions outside the stated jurisdiction of location or geographical boundary.
Similar studies can be done outside of Lusaka.
56
APPENDIX I: STUDENT’S QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Respondent,
I am a final year student at Cavendish University and as a requirement for the fulfillment of my
undergraduate degree program I am required to undertake a research study. You therefore have
been selected to participate in this study with the topic above. It is at my most sincere request
that you spare a few minutes of your time to respond to the questions in this questionnaire. My
research study topic is: Impact of social media on students behavior change in universities.
You are among the respondents selected to participate in this study. Please note that the
information you will avail shall be treated anonymously therefore, you are not required to reveal
your name on the questionnaire. This research is purely for academic purposes as it is a partial
fulfillment for the award of a Bachelor’s Degree in Journalism and Mass Communication. Your
honest and objective response will be highly appreciated.
57
9. What do you think are the impacts of social media on the behavior change of university
students in Zambia?
10. In your view, what are some of the risks that come with the use of social media?
______________________________________________________________________________
11. Do you think there credibility of information received over social media platforms?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
Specify your answer: _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
12. To you what are the major pros and cons of social media?
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
14. What influence do social media have on your personal and professional development of?
______________________________________________________________________________
15. What are some of the ways that can be used to help the students on how to use social media
wisely?
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1) Babbie, E. (2002). The Practice of Social Research Belmont. Wadsworth.
58
1) Berson, I. R., & Berson, M. J. (2005). Challenging Online Behaviors of Youth: Findings
from a Comparative Analysis of Young People in the United States and New Zealand
1) Chambers, D. (2013). Social media and personal relationships: Online intimacies and
networked friendship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2) David L “Uses and Gratification Theory,” in learning theories, January 26, 2016
Retrieved from http/www.learning theories/uses-and-gratification-theory.html 3) Fowler,
J. (2004). Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks. CA. sage.
4) Hew K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2012). Student participation in online discussions:
Challenges, solutions, and future research. New York: Springer.
5) Khan R., Kellner D. (2004). New media and Internet Activism: From the battle of Seattle
to Blogging. Journal of Media and Society, 6(1), 87-95. Retrieved July 25, 2013 from
Sage Publications Database.
6) Klapper J.T. (1960) the effect of Mass Communication, Free Press Klappers
phenomensitic theory klappers generalizations criticism theories of communication &
Leedy, P.D. (1993). Practical research: planning and design.6 Ed. New Jersey: Prentice
Hall.
7) Lin, C. A., & Atkin, D. J. (2007). Communication technology and social change: Theory
and implications. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8) Livingstone, S. M., & Drotner, K. (2008). International handbook of children, media and
culture London: SAGE.
9) Livingstone, S. M., Bober, M., & London School of Economics and Political Science
(2005) UK children go online: Listening to young people's experiences. London: Dept. of
Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science.
10) Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing qualitative research 3rd ed
11) Mcluhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The making of Typographic Man. Toronto:
University of Toronto Press.
12) Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (1999). Research methods: Quantitative and
qualitative approaches. Nairobi, Kenya: African Centre for Technology Studies.
59