0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views6 pages

Questions Based On P-Chart

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views6 pages

Questions Based On P-Chart

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6
ane 7. 15 sample with size 200, each taken at an interval of 45 minutes from « Solution. Oe 8. Solution. manufacturing process. The average fraction defective -was 0.068. Calculate the values of central line, upper and lower control line. Here, we have Average fraction defective = 0.068 +. central line =p = 0.068 We know that’ UCL_= 5 PU-P) _ 9.06843 (0.068 (1-0.068) p p+3 JP 0.068 + eos = 0.068 + 0.053 = 0.121 LeL,= B-3 Po cP = 0,068 — 0.053 = 0.015 Ans ive mobiles in 8 samples, each The following table gives the number of defect sample containing 100 mobiles, ; Sample of Mobiles F [2 f 3 J 4151612 4 No. ofdefective |215]5|6.[1]s5]111 Find the control limits. Here, we have Number of samples = 8 Number of mobiles in each sample = 100 =n Total number of mobiles = N = 8 x 100 = 800 quality Control Methods (Control Charts) Total number of defective mobiles = ¥ =2+54+54+641454147, =32 459 < _ Total number of defective mobile: all the samples combined Total number of mobiles in all the samples combined 2082 ~ 800 = 0.04 ental control line vce = p+3, [ZOD _ 494, , [Oma=o0H n 100 = 0.04 + 0.0588 = 0.0988 —_, [Bd- LcL = B-3, Poop = 0.04 - 0.0588 = - 0.0188 Ans. =0 (p # negative) Eng Construct a p- chart for the following data : { No. of samples (each of 100 items) | 1 | 2 [3]4[5]6]7| 8 [9 [10 No. of defectives 12 [10[6[8 [9 [9] 7 fro[ | 8 Solution, | No. of Samples'] No. of units in | No. of defectives | Fraction defective a sample (n) 1 100 12 2 100 10 3 100 6 4 100 8 5 100 9 6 100 9 7 100 7 0.07 8 100 10. «i eval 0.10 9 100 Nl i Ol 10 100 8 0.08 |_ Total N= 1000 Ed = 90) wf) erage faction defective Total no. of defectives in all samples combined Total no, of items in all samples Id 90. \aag N *dTimits u = "Per control timit = UCL = p+3,J20-P) 7 rs (0.09 10.09) = 009 +3 J “a Introduction to Engineering Mathem, al ling = 0094-3 Y0,000819 u = 0.09 + 3 x 0.0286 = 0.09 + 0.0858 = 0.1758 in P(l-p) Lower control limit =LCL = P-3 [eo=P - = 0.09 - 0.0858 = 0.0042 Y A 0.16: UCL = 0.1758 g 0.14 3 0.124.120 8 0.10: 0.109 010 0.11 Oo dne oO A aBpBin de Boe Sar 18 ‘Sample Number Alll the\values lie between control limits. Hence} the variability is under control. Ans, ae Solution. 10. The number of defectives in 20 samples each of 2000 items are given belov 425 1430 _| 216 | 341 | 225 | 322 | 280 | 306 | 337 | 305 356 |402 | 216 | 264 | 126 | 409 | 193 | 280 | 326 | 38 Calculate the values of the central line UCL and LCL. 5 Here, we have number of samples = 20 tems in each sample = 2000.) + Total number of defectives Ed= 425 + 430 + 216 +341 +225+ sa ‘ 306 + 337 + 305 + 356 + 4024216 + 264 + 126 +409 + 193 + 280+ 389 => Yd=6148 7 ~ Zotal number of defectives in all samples combined = Total number of defectives in all samples combined Total-number of items in all the samples. =e 0.1537 Control line = CL = 0.1537 1-p) [0.1537 (1- 0.1537) UCL = 73 [PO PY = 0.s 0.1937 (= O.tae 0.1537 +3 e000 jy oon! Mathods (Control Chara) ave" 464 0.1537 x04 = 0.1537 +3 | 2000" 915374 3 * 0.00800 = 0.1537 + 0.02418 = 0.1779 =. PUED LeL = PH3 Pap = 0.1537 = 0.1537 - 0.02418 = 0,12952 Ans. yeCertain locomotive parts produced are inspected for :asting. zsults wi as follows. (construct ape char) dO” Mls The results ave No. of samples | No. of units in] No. of defectives | Fraction dejectives| @ sample d 1 200 2 2 200°! 16 3 200 18 4 200 i y 5 200° 38 6 200 3 7 200. - 20 8 200. 36 9 200 6 10 200 8 ul 200 CG 22 + 200 19 Total 2400. 220 ( Average fraction defective Total number of defective in all samples combined Total number of items in all the samples YW 73490 = 0:0917 (@) Standard limit , \ fe OTIS Upper limit = P+3 EP 0.0917 + 3 etTM= 0.0917) i" =00612 UCL, = 0.0917 + 0,0612 = 0.1529 LCL, = 0.0917 ~ 0.0612, = 0.0305 43. Introduction to Engineerin 19 Mathemay, ati Y o20 8 a 4 0.18 018 0.16 [ure = 0.14 0.13 0.1820 ‘a 12 OP) oot oto 0.10 ° 0.095 CL=0,0917 0.08 0.06 0.04 a 0.015 oO Lee ee ee EET ire oy 23e45 67 8 9 0 12 4 ‘Number of samples wo samples no. 5 and 8 are above UCL line and two samples no 0 and 11 below the LoL line. In this way four samples are outside the control limits. The assignable causes for the samples should be detected, identified and corrected. ye 12. The following set of data covering 15 consecutive production days on te number of defectives found in daily production from a sample of 200 wnisis given. Draw a p- chart and test whether the production process was in Proucionday 11727374 [516] 7 1819 [ope [23] ts No. of defectives [10/5] 10] 12 [11 [9 | 22 [4 [12 [24] 21/15] 8 [414 Solution. No, of samples | No. of units in. | No. of defectives | Fraction defect a sample (n) d af P n 1 200. 10. 0.05 2 200 5 0.025 3 200 10 0.05 4 200 12 0.06 5 200 ile 0.055 6 200 9 0.045 1 200 22, oll 8 200 a 0.02 9 200 12° 0.06 10 200 Bebhui? 0.12 i 200 21 0.105 12 200 15 0.075 13 200 pe 0.04 14 200 14 0.07 15 200 4 0,02 181 — au samplesigombined _ 181 = 00 30,00 7 Tor number of | 1 Quellly Control Methods (Control Charts) 463 so psa Hits = 0,0603 + 3 : 200 Upper limit = 0.0603 + 0.0505 = 0.1108 0.1108 UCL, = 0.0603 + 0.0505 = LCL,, = 0.0603 - 0.0505 = 0.0098 " © _ [Eetp= 0.0098. x = ae 1213-14-15 5. 6. 7-8-9. 40 11 One sample point is above the UCL line, so the production process is to be corrected to make itunder control. Mra. Oran

You might also like