Nutrition-GSCI1045 Lecture - Week 2
Nutrition-GSCI1045 Lecture - Week 2
Nutrition-GSCI1045 Lecture - Week 2
Week 2
Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) - is the median daily value of a given nutrient that is
estimated to meet 1/2 of a healthy individual’s needs for a specific gender or during a
specific life-stage like infancy. At this level of intake, the other half of the individuals in the
specified group would not have their nutritional needs met.
Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) – is the average daily dietary intake that is
sufficient to meet the nutrient requirement of nearly all (97 to 98 percent) healthy
individuals in a particular life-stage and gender group. The RDA is the goal for usual intake
by a healthy individual. However, it is controversial as to whether this should be our goal or
our minimum intake. This does not necessarily meet the needs of unhealthy individuals.
Adequate Intake (AI) – is used if sufficient scientific evidence is not available to establish an
EAR on which to base an RDA. Instead, an AI is derived using observed or experimentally
determined approximations or estimates of nutrient intake by a group (or groups) of
apparently healthy people who maintain an adequate nutritional state. It is educated
guesswork. The AI is not equivalent to an RDA. The AI is expected to meet or exceed the
needs of most individuals in a specific life-stage and gender group.
Upper Tolerable Limit (UL) – is the highest average daily nutrient intake level likely to pose
no risk of adverse health effects to almost all individuals in a given life-stage and gender
group. This is not a recommended level of intake and as your intake increases above the UL,
the potential risk of adverse effects also increases.
Estimated Energy Requirement (EER) – is the average dietary energy intake that is
predicted to maintain energy balance in healthy, normal weight individuals of a defined age,
gender, weight, height, and level of physical activity consistent with good health. In children
and pregnant and lactating women, the EER includes the needs associated with growth or
secretion of milk at rates consistent with good health.
Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) - is the value of the energy-yielding
nutrients carbohydrates, protein, and fat, expressed as percentages of total daily calorie
intake, sufficient to provide total adequate energy needs; staying within the AMDR is
associated with reducing the risks for developing chronic disease. The percentage ranges are
Protein - 20-35%, Carbohydrates - 45-65%, Fat- 20-35%.
View a slideshare on the DRIs here https://www.slideshare.net/secret/dBNcDUMtdJ3Xyo
And on the next page view the short video that explains more about the DRIs
Page 4 of 20
5. . This is the highest level of nutrients that nearly all healthy individuals in a particular
group can reach without adverse effect.
ULs (Tolerable upper intake levels)
AIs (Adequate Intake)
RDAs (Recommended Dietary Allowance)
For more information on Canadian DRIs see DRI Questions & Answers from Health Canada
Answers:
The DRI Values: Definitions
1. What are Dietary Reference Intakes?
The Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) are a set of scientifically based nutrient reference
values for healthy populations. The DRIs for various groups of nutrients have been
developed over a span of time, with reports on all of the nutrients published between 1997
and 2004. Recently, Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D have been re-
examined, with an updated report on those two nutrients released by the IOM on
November 30, 2010.
DRIs are used by nutrition practitioners, governments, and non-governmental organizations
to assess and plan the nutrient intakes of individuals and population groups.
"Dietary Reference Intakes" (DRIs) is an umbrella term that describes four types of
reference values:
o Estimated Average Requirement (EAR)
o Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA)
o Adequate Intake (AI)
o Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL)
The DRIs replace the 1990 Recommended Nutrient Intakes (RNIs) in Canada and the 1989
Recommended Dietary Allowances in the United States. The DRIs are established through a
process overseen by the National Academy of Sciences, which is a private, non-profit society
of distinguished scholars with a mandate to advise the US government on scientific and
technical matters. Both American and Canadian scientists have participated in the
development of the DRIs.
DRIs are established using an expanded concept that includes indicators of good health and
the prevention of chronic disease, as well as possible adverse effects of excess intakes of
nutrients. Each type of DRI refers to the average daily nutrient intake of healthy individuals
over time.
Key differences in the DRI approach compared to the former RNIs include:
o working together with American scientists and harmonizing nutrient recommendations
for Canada and the United States
o making use of the concepts of probability and risk to underpin the determination of DRIs
and their application in assessment and planning
o considering the risks of excessive nutrient intakes and establishing upper levels of intake
where data exist regarding risk of adverse health effects
o establishing multiple reference values for each nutrient, allowing for more diverse
applications in assessing and planning diets
o reviewing components of food that may not meet the traditional concept of a nutrient
but are of possible benefit to health
Page 6 of 20
o making recommendations for future research directions based on the knowledge gaps
identified
2. What is an Estimated Average Requirement (EAR)?
An Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) is the median usual intake value that is estimated
to meet the requirement of half the healthy individuals in a life-stage and gender group. At
this level of intake, the other half of the individuals in the specified group would not have
their needs met. The EAR is based on a specific criterion of adequacy, derived from a careful
review of the literature. Reduction of disease risk is considered along with many other
health parameters in the selection of that criterion. The EAR is used to calculate the RDA.
In the case of energy, an Estimated Energy Requirement (EER) is established rather than an
EAR. An EER is defined as the average dietary energy intake that is predicted to maintain
energy balance in healthy, normal weight individuals of a defined age, gender, weight,
height, and level of physical activity consistent with good health. In children and pregnant
and lactating women, the EER includes the needs associated with growth or secretion of
milk at rates consistent with good health.
3. What is a Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA)?
A Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) is the average daily dietary intake level that is
sufficient to meet the nutrient requirement of nearly all (97 to 98 percent) healthy
individuals in a particular life-stage and gender group.
o If the distribution of requirements in the group is assumed to be normal, then the RDA
can be calculated from the EAR and the standard deviation of requirements (SDREQ) as
follows: RDA = EAR + 2 SDREQ
o If the distribution of requirements is known to be skewed, other methods are used to
identify the 97th to 98th percentile of the requirement distribution and to set the RDA
at this level.
The RDA is used as a goal for the usual intake of individuals. Because the RDA is calculated
based on the EAR, an RDA can only be set for a particular nutrient if there is sufficient
scientific evidence to establish an EAR for that nutrient.
4. What is an Adequate Intake (AI)?
If sufficient scientific evidence is not available to establish an EAR and set an RDA, an AI is
derived for the nutrient instead. An AI is based on much less data and incorporates
substantially more judgment than is used in establishing an EAR and subsequently the RDA.
The issuance of an AI indicates that more research is needed to determine, with some
degree of confidence, the mean and distribution of requirements for that specific nutrient.
The AI is a recommended average daily nutrient intake level based on observed or
experimentally determined approximations or estimates of nutrient intake by a group (or
groups) of apparently healthy people who are assumed to be maintaining an adequate
nutritional state. Examples of adequate nutritional states include normal growth,
maintenance of normal levels of nutrients in plasma, and other aspects of nutritional well-
being or general health. For example:
o For young infants, the AI is usually based on the daily mean nutrient intake supplied by
human milk for healthy, full-term infants who are exclusively fed human milk.
o For adults, the AI may be based on data from one type of experiment (e.g., the AI for
choline), based on estimated dietary intakes in apparently healthy population groups
(e.g., the AIs for biotin and pantothenic acid), or result from a review of data from
different approaches (e.g., the AI for calcium, based on calcium retention, factorial
Page 7 of 20
estimates of requirements, and limited data on bone mineral density and bone mineral
content changes in adult women).
The AI is expected to meet or exceed the needs of most individuals in a specific life-stage
and gender group. When an RDA is not available for a nutrient (because there is no EAR),
the AI can be used as the goal for an individual's intake. However, the AI has very limited
uses in assessments of any type.
5. What is a Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL)?
A Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) is the highest level of continuing daily nutrient intake
that is likely to pose no risk of adverse health effects in almost all individuals in the life-stage
group for which it has been designed.
o As intake increases above the UL, the potential risk of adverse effects increases.
o The term "tolerable" intake was chosen to avoid implying a possible beneficial effect.
Instead, the term is intended to specify a level of intake with a high probability of being
tolerated biologically. The UL is not intended to be a recommended level of intake.
o Unless specifically identified in the nutrient reports (e.g., for folate in the prevention of
neural tube defects), there is no currently established benefit to healthy individuals of
ingesting nutrients in amounts exceeding the RDA or AI.
o At intakes between the RDA and UL, the risks to the individual of inadequacy and of
excess are both close to zero.
The need to establish ULs grew out of the increasingly common practice of fortification of
foods with nutrients and the increased use of dietary supplements. The adverse health
effects used to determine a UL vary from nutrient to nutrient. ULs are based on evaluations
conducted using the Dietary Reference Intakes: A Risk Assessment Model for Establishing
Upper Intake Levels for Nutrients adopted in 1998 for the DRI process by the Institute of
Medicine. The risk assessment model was designed specifically to address the potential for
adverse effects from overconsumption of nutrients.
6. Are ULs set for all nutrients?
No. For some nutrients, the data are not sufficient at this time to establish a UL. This
indicates the need for caution in consuming high intakes of those nutrients. It should not be
interpreted as meaning that high intakes pose no risk of adverse effects. For example,
arsenic is known to be toxic in high doses, but it has no UL because not enough data exist on
chronic intake of lower doses to set a UL. When a UL cannot be determined, it is important
to be careful about consuming levels above the RDA or AI.
7. What is an Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR)?
An Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) is defined as a range of intakes for
a particular energy source that is associated with reduced risk of chronic disease while
providing adequate intakes of essential nutrients. An AMDR is expressed as a percentage of
total energy intake. If an individual consumes below or above this range, there is a potential
for increasing the risk of chronic diseases shown to affect long-term health, as well as
increasing the risk of insufficient intakes of essential nutrients. AMDRs have been
established for protein, carbohydrate, fat, and linoleic (n-6) and alpha-linolenic (n-3)
polyunsaturated fatty acids.
The DRI Review Framework
1. Who is responsible for developing the Dietary Reference Intakes?
The Dietary Reference Intakes are established by expert panels of Canadian and American
scientists, through a review process overseen by the US Food and Nutrition Board of the
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences (NAS). The NAS is a private, non-profit
Page 8 of 20
coordination of Canadian and U.S. support and funding of DRI-related work as well as
discussions on future work needed.
3. How does Health Canada obtain expert advice on implementation of the DRIs into
Canadian policies, regulations, and guidance?
Health Canada will be making use of an Expert Advisory Committee on Dietary Reference
Intakes to advise on potential intervention options, which could include changes to dietary
guidance, policies related to the food supply, or targeted education.
The Expert Advisory Committee advising on the implementation of the 2010 Dietary
Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D is independent of government and is managed
by the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences.
Basic Formula
Total Energy Energy Estimated Energy Requirement
+
Expenditure Deposition = (kcal/day)
Pregnancy
Estimated Energy Requirement (kcal/day) = Non-Pregnant EER + Pregnancy Energy Deposition
1st trimester
EER = Non-pregnant EER + 0
2nd trimester
EER = Non-pregnant EER + 340
3rd trimester
EER = Non-pregnant EER + 452
Lactation
Estimated Energy Requirement (kcal/day) = Non-pregnant EER + Milk Energy Output - Weight Loss
0-6 months postpartum
EER = Non-pregnant EER + 500 - 170
7-12 months postpartum
EER = Non-pregnant EER + 400 – 0
One of the main criticisms was that people did not understand how to apply the serving
recommendations. For example, 125ml 100% fruit juice was considered a serving of
“vegetables and fruit”. This was an issue because Canadians didn’t understand that most
juices in the grocery store are not 100% juice and contain large quantities of added sugar
that would be equivalent to a bottle of soda. This lead people to believe that drinking 4-5
boxes of “fruit punch” would help them achieve their “vegetable and fruit” servings which
was not true.
Our latest revision to the guide does away with portion sizes and speaks out against fruit
juices, but does our new guide do enough for all Canadians?
Read the two articles listed below and think about the claims being made about our food
guide.
Do you agree? Disagree? What, if any, improvements could be made to our guide?
1. Canada's new Food Guide is a good upgrade, but it skirts around issues of equality. (Jan
22, 2019) by Andre Picard ,The Globe & Mail
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-canadas-new-food-guide-is-a-good-
upgrade-but-skirts-around-issues-of/
2. Canada's Food Guide - a new dish with a dash of condescension (Jan 22, 2019) by
Sylvain Charlebois, Ottawa Citizen
https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/columnists/charlebois-canadas-food-guide-a-new-
dish-with-a-dash-of-condescension
In 2014, Brazil released their updated food guide. Many scholars in the nutrition community
applauded Brazil for their more practical approach to nutrition and health promotion.
Brazil’s 10 Steps to a Healthy Diet
1. Make natural or minimally processed foods the basis of your diet.
2. Use oils, fats, salt and sugar in small amounts.
3. Limit consumption or processed foods.
4. Avoid consumption of ultra-processed foods.
5. Eat regularly and carefully in appropriate environments and in company.
6. Shop in places that offer a variety of natural or minimally-processed foods.
7. Develop, exercise and share cooking skills.
8. Plan your time to make food and eating important in your life.
9. Out of home, prefer places that serve freshly made meals.
10. Be wary of food advertising and marketing.
What do you like/dislike about Brazil’s food guide? How close is it to Canada's most recent
guide? How much influence do you think this guide had on The 2019 version of Canada's
Food Guide? What specific parts are the same as Canada's new guide?
For more information on this topic, you can also review some of the articles below:
Brazil Guidelines http://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/Brazilian-Dietary-
Guidelines-2014.pdf3.
Kirkey, Sharon. (May 22,2015) Canada's Food Guide has been around for 73 years- Critics
say it's due for an overhaul. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/0523-naa-food-
guide
Page 15 of 20
Have you read the news lately? It seems like everyone is talking about the Mediterranean
diet. Many people claim the Mediterranean diet is the healthiest diet in the world and they
may not be wrong! Studies have shown that following this diet helps protect against heart
disease, obesity and diabetes among many other health benefits.
The Mediterranean diet focuses on whole, minimally processed food that includes fresh
vegetables and fruits, legumes, whole grains, nuts and olive oil as the main fat. The
Mediterranean diet is primarily a plant-based diet but does include poultry, fish and dairy.
Red meat is limited to a few times per month and eggs are also limited. The Mediterranean
diet usually includes a moderate amount of wine (no more than 5oz per day for women and
10oz per day for men), although this is optional and may not be recommended for
everyone.
This pattern of eating is rich in monounsaturated fat, low in the artery clogging saturated
fat, high in fibre and rich in phytochemicals. Together, these effects decrease inflammation
that is associated with many chronic diseases.
The following video by Leslie Beck, RD gives more details on how to follow the
Mediterranean diet:
Beck, L. (February 26, 2013). Leslie Beck shows you how to eat a Mediterranean diet.
Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/life-video/video-leslie-beck-shows-
you-how-to-eat-a-mediterranean-diet/article8596126/
View or download a larger copy of the Mediterranean Diet Pyramid here and learn more
about the diet plan at Oldways: Mediterranean Diet
Page 16 of 20
Alternative Guides: The Healthy Eating Plate and the Healthy Eating Pyramid
The healthy eating plate and food pyramid are some alternative tools that can be used in
meal planning.
The Healthy Eating Plate
The Harvard healthy eating plate provides an easy to follow visual of what a typical meal
should look like and the best options for each food group. It recommends half of the plate
be a variety of fruit and vegetables, ¼ whole grains, ¼ mostly non red-meat based protein
and healthy oils in moderation.
What sources of information and tools are available to help you make healthy choices and
to live well?
Dietitians Of Canada
Representing professional dietitians, Dietitians of Canada support ethical, evidence-based
best practice, advance knowledge of food and nutrition, support their members as leaders
in health and wellness and also mentor those interested in beginning nutritional careers.
They also manage the website EatRight Ontario and have created eaTracker, a
free online tool that lets you track and analyze your food intake and physical activity.
UnlockFood
URL: https://youtu.be/4ugf9s0GFGI
Mindful Eating
Mindless vs Mindful Eating
Have you ever eaten past the point of feeling full? Looking for something to eat when you
were bored, sad, or feeling stressed out? Looked down at the bag of chips you were eating
while watching TV and wondered where the chips went? Eaten lunch at your desk while
working?
If you have done any of these, they are examples of not eating mindfully.
Page 19 of 20
According to research, every day we make more than 200 food decisions. Many of these
decisions are overlooked. Decisions about whether to eat, what to eat, and how much to eat
are based on what we usually do. We are influenced by external cues such as seeing or
smelling food, or we may simply eat what is around.
Mindless eating occurs when we eat without thinking. We can be influenced by the people
around us, the packaging, the portions or the distractions.
Serving dishes and glassware can affect us. That snack food in easy reach can influence us to
eat more. And eating in front of the TV or computer can cause us to eat mindlessly.
And food advertisements may encourage us to eat whether we are hungry or not.
What is Mindful Eating?
Mindful eating is more about how we eat than what we eat. It is about eating with attention
and intention by becoming more aware of our physical hunger cues verses non-hunger
eating cues (ex. eating because something is there, emotions, etc.) It is eating for both
enjoyment and nourishment.
Mindfulness comes from principles found in Buddhism and means living with greater
awareness of moment-to-moment thoughts, feelings, and actions. Mindful eating may be a
step towards healthy eating. The concept of mindful eating means paying close attention to
every detail of the eating experience. Being mindful can increase our awareness of the
internal and external cues that guide eating behavior. These cues may be physical,
emotional, or cognitive.
Often, we eat almost automatically giving little thought to what or how much we are eating.
The candy jar is there so you grab some. You are served a large plate of food and you eat it
all. You order the number one combo because that is what you usually eat. Mindfulness can
lead to making intentional choices in eating instead of responding to external cues,
emotions, or your environment.
Part of mindful eating is that nothing is off limits. Sometimes people think that if they allow
themselves to eat whatever they want, they will eat, as an example, chocolate bars all day.
However, when people try this approach and become more in tune with their hunger, they
find they don’t actually want to eat chocolate all day.
The Mindful Eating Cycle
Consider these questions:
Why do I eat? - Before eating, ask yourself if you are truly hungry, or if you are experiencing
another emotion. Was it an environmental trigger – ex. bowl of candy in the lounge
When? - By yourself? When are you with others?
What? - Specific foods – good verses bad
How? - Fast verses slow
How much? - Did you finish your plate?
Where? - At your desk, at a dining table, in the car?
Tips
o Ask yourself if you are truly hungry, if you are, go ahead and eat
o Get rid of distractions – turn off the tv, get away from the computer, put your cellphone
away Eat sitting down
o Set a place for yourself and use tableware and utensils that appeal to you
o Eat slowly
o Notice textures, aroma, flavors
o Start slowly – pick a meal, or even a mouthful or two at each meal to practice
mindfulness
Page 20 of 20
Eating should be a pleasurable and satisfying experience. You should never feel “guilty”
about eating. Eat slowly and without distraction to savor and enjoy every bite. Eat what
appeals to you and try to get in-touch with your internal hunger and satiety cues to prevent
mindless eating.
Checkout this short video reviewing tips for Mindful Eating
URL: https://youtu.be/oJSpQHcJfKs
Checklist Week 2
Before proceeding to the next module check that you have completed all of these things:
o Reviewed all the content of this module. Read pages and watched video, completed
activities.
o Read Chapter 2 Achieving a Healthy Diet Essentials of Nutrition: A Functional Approach
text
o Taken Module Practice Quiz 2 to check your knowledge of the module
o Begun work on Diet Analysis Assignment.