Sexting Policy April 2019
Sexting Policy April 2019
Sexting Policy April 2019
Definition of ‘sexting’ 3
Handling Incidents 4
Initial response 4
Initial review meeting 4
Assessing the risks 5
Meeting and talking to the young person/people involved 5
Informing parents (or carers) 6
Reporting incidents to the police 6
Securing and handing over devices to the police 6
SPA contact and referrals 6
Searching devices, viewing and deleting youth produced sexual imagery 6
Deletion of images 7
Recording incidents of youth produced sexual imagery 8
Review 8
2
Sexting Policy
Sexting Policy
1. Introduction
1.1. Increases in the speed and ease of sharing photographs and videos has brought concerns about young
people producing and sharing sexual imagery of themselves. This can expose them to risks, particularly if
the imagery is shared further, including embarrassment, bullying and increased vulnerability to sexual
exploitation. Making, possessing and sharing sexual images of under 18s is also illegal (including images of
yourself if you are under 18). Although the production of such imagery will usually take place outside of
school, issues often manifest in schools and we understand the need to respond swiftly and confidently
to ensure that pupils are safeguarded, supported and educated. This policy provides a guide for staff,
pupils and parents/carers as to how the school will proceed and what steps will be taken should an
incident of sexting be reported or suspected. Our response to these incidents will be guided by the
principle of proportionality and the primary concern at all times will be the welfare and protection of the
young people involved.
1.2. We are aware that teaching about safeguarding issues in the classroom can prevent harm by providing
pupils with skills, attributes and knowledge to help them navigate risks. Addressing sensitive issues such
as sexting promotes a whole school approach to safeguarding, and gives pupils the space to explore key
issues and the confidence to seek the support of adults should they encounter problems. We provide
pupils with opportunities to learn about the issue of sexting through our PSHE programme (part of the
Aspire-SMART sessions). Further detailed guidance is given by visiting speakers and through the Chrome
Code which is delivered as part of Digital Literacy.
1.3. This policy forms part of the school’s safeguarding arrangements and all incidents of sexting will be dealt
with as safeguarding concerns. It is based on the UK Council for Child Internet Safety guidance ‘Sexting in
Schools and Colleges: Responding to Incidents and Safeguarding Young People’ (the ‘UKCCIS Guidance’)
and should be read in conjunction with the following school policies: Safeguarding and Child Protection;
Anti-Bullying; Behaviour, Discipline, Exclusions, Restraint and Searches; and Online Safety.
2. Definition of ‘sexting’
2.1. There is no clear definition of ‘sexting’, which can mean different things to different groups of people.
This policy covers the sharing of sexual photographs or videos by young people that they, or another
young person, have created of themselves (referred to in this policy as ‘youth produced sexual imagery’.
2.2. The types of incidents related to youth produced sexual imagery which this policy covers are:
● A person under the age of 18 creates and shares sexual imagery of themselves with a peer
under the age of 18
● A person under the age of 18 shares sexual imagery created by another person under the age of
18 with a peer under the age of 18 or an adult
● A person under the age of 18 is in possession of sexual imagery created by another person
under the age of 18.
2.3. Sexting in this policy also covers sending and receiving text based messages relating to sexual behaviour
by pupils which don’t contain imagery and pupils sharing adult digital pornography. It does not cover the
sharing of sexual imagery of people under 18 by adults as this constitutes child sexual abuse and we will
always inform the police.
3
Sexting Policy
3. Handling Incidents
The school’s Designated Safeguarding Lead (DSL) is Ms Cavanagh, Head teacher
The school’s Deputy DSLs are Mr Brook, Deputy Head teacher and Ms Venter, Deputy Head teacher
If none of the above apply then we may decide to respond to the incident without involving the police or
4
Sexting Policy
the SPA (but may choose to escalate the incident at any time if further information/concerns come to
light). The decision to respond to the incident without involving the police or the SPA would be made in
cases when the DSL is confident that they have enough information to assess the risks to pupils involved
and the risks can be managed within the school’s pastoral support and disciplinary framework and if
appropriate local network of support.
The decision will be made by the DSL with input from the Headteacher and input from other members of
staff if appropriate and will be taken in line with the school’s child protection procedures, based on
consideration of the best interests of the young people involved. This should take into account
proportionality as well as the welfare and protection of the young people. The decision should be
reviewed throughout the process of responding to the incident. If a young person has shared imagery or
text consensually, such as when in a romantic relationship and there is no intended malice, it will usually
be appropriate for the school to manage the incident directly. In contrast any incidents with aggravating
factors, for example, a young person sharing someone else’s youth produced sexual imagery without
consent and with malicious intent, should generally be referred to police and/or the SPA. If there are any
doubts about whether to involve other agencies, a referral should be made to the police. The decision will
be recorded in line with school safeguarding policy.
The DSL should always use their professional judgement in conjunction with their colleagues to assess
incidents.
When discussing the sharing of youth produced sexual imagery, it is important that the DSL (or other
teacher) recognises and discusses the pressures that young people can be under to take part in sharing
such imagery. They should explain that it is not ok for someone to make the pupil feel uncomfortable, to
pressure them into doing things that they don’t want to do, or to show them things that they are
unhappy about. They should remain solution-focussed and reassure the pupil that the school will do
5
Sexting Policy
everything that they can to help and support them.
3.9. Searching devices, viewing and deleting youth produced sexual imagery
Viewing youth produced sexual imagery
Adults should not view youth produced sexual imagery unless there is good and clear reason to do so.
Wherever possible responses to incidents should be based on what the DSL has been told about the
content of the imagery. The decision to view imagery will be based on the professional judgement of the
DSL and should always comply with the school’s Safeguarding and Child Protection Policy and the
procedures of the school. Imagery will never be viewed if the act of viewing will cause significant distress
or harm to the pupil.
If a decision is made to view youth produced sexual imagery the DSL would need to be satisfied that
viewing:
● is the only way to make a decision about whether to involve other agencies (i.e. it is not possible
to establish the facts from the young people involved);
● is necessary to report the image to a website, app or suitable reporting agency to have it taken
down, or to support the young person or parent in making a report;
● is unavoidable because a pupil has presented an image directly to a staff member or the
imagery has been found on a school device or network.
6
Sexting Policy
If it is necessary to view the imagery then the DSL should:
If youth produced sexual imagery has been unavoidably viewed by a member of staff either following a
disclosure from a young person or as a result of a member of staff undertaking their daily role (such as IT
staff monitoring school systems) then the DSL should ensure that the staff member is provided with
appropriate support. Viewing youth produced sexual imagery can be distressing for both young people
and adults and appropriate emotional support may be required.
Schools have the power to search pupils for devices, search data on devices and delete imagery and text.
When an electronic device, such as a mobile phone, has been seized, a teacher who has been formally
authorised by the head teacher can examine data or files, and delete these, where there is good reason
to do so. There is no need to have parental consent to search through a young person’s mobile phone.
If during a search a teacher finds material which concerns them and they reasonably suspect the material
has been or could be used to cause harm or commit an offence, they can decide whether they should
delete the material or retain it as evidence of a criminal offence or a breach of school discipline. They can
also decide whether the material is of such seriousness that the police need to be involved. However, a
search through devices and the deletion of imagery or text will not be undertaken unless there is good
and clear reason to do so. In most cases pupils will be asked to delete imagery and/or text and to confirm
that they have deleted the imagery and/or text. They will be given a deadline for deletion across all
devices, online storage or social media sites.
If the incident involves youth produced sexual imagery they will be reminded that possession of youth
produced sexual imagery is illegal. They should be informed that if they refuse or it is later discovered
they did not delete the image they are committing a criminal offence and the police may become
involved.
All of these decisions will be recorded, including times, dates and reasons for decisions made and logged
in the safeguarding records. Parents and carers should also be informed unless this presents a further risk
7
Sexting Policy
to the young person. At this point disciplinary measures may be applied in line with the Behaviour Policy.
4. Review
This policy will be reviewed annually by Kingston Educational Trust and by a member of the senior
leadership team in consultation with the DSL and other staff with safeguarding and child protection
expertise. The next review is due February 2020.
signed: