France in The Long and Eventful Nineteenth Century
France in The Long and Eventful Nineteenth Century
France in The Long and Eventful Nineteenth Century
In the history of France, the period from 1789 to 1914, dubbed the "long 19th century" by the
historian Eric Hobsbawm, extends from the French Revolution to World War I and includes:
General aspects
Geography
With the French defeat in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, France lost Alsace and portions of
Lorraine to Germany (see Alsace-Lorraine); these lost provinces were not regained until the end of
World War I.
Demographics
Between 1795 and 1866, metropolitan France (that is, without
overseas or colonial possessions) was the second most
populous country of Europe, behind Russia, and the fourth
most populous country in the world (behind China, India, and
Russia); between 1866 and 1911, metropolitan France was the
third most populous country of Europe, behind Russia and
Germany. Unlike other European countries, France did not
experience a strong population growth from the middle of the
19th century to the first half of the 20th century. The French
population in 1789 is estimated at 28 million; by 1850, it was French peasants depicted in Fin du
36 million and in 1880 it was around 39 million.[1] Slow growth travail (1887)
was a major political issue, as arch-rival Germany continued to
gain an advantage in terms of population and industry. Ways to
reverse the trend became a major political issue.[2]
Until 1850, population growth was mainly in the countryside, but a period of slow urbanization
began under the Second Empire. Unlike in England, industrialization was a late phenomenon in
France. France's economy in the 1830s had a limited iron industry, under-developed coal supplies,
and the great majority lived on farms. The systematic establishment of primary education and the
creation of new engineering schools prepared an industrial expansion which would blossom in the
following decades. French rail transport only began hesitantly in the 1830s, and would not truly
develop until the 1840s, using imported British engineers. By the revolution of 1848, a growing
industrial workforce began to participate actively in French politics, but their hopes were largely
betrayed by the policies of the Second Empire. The loss of the important coal, steel and glass
production regions of Alsace and Lorraine would cause further problems. The industrial worker
population increased from 23% in 1870 to 39% in 1914. Nevertheless, France remained a rather
rural country in the early 1900s with 40% of the population still farmers in 1914. While exhibiting a
similar urbanization rate to the U.S. (50% of the population in the U.S. was engaged in agriculture
in the early 1900s), the urbanization rate of France was still well behind that of the UK (80%
urbanization rate in the early 1900s).[3]
Alsace and Lorraine were lost to Germany in 1871. Some French refugees moved to France. France
suffered massive losses during World War I — roughly estimated at 1.4 million French dead
including civilians (see World War I casualties) (or nearly 10% of the active adult male population)
and four times as many wounded (see World War I § Aftermath).
Language
Linguistically, France was a patchwork. People in the countryside spoke various languages. France
would only become a linguistically unified country by the end of the 19th century, and in particular
through the educational policies of Jules Ferry during the French Third Republic. From an
illiteracy rate of 33% among peasants in 1870, by 1914 almost all French could read and
understand the national language, although 50% still understood or spoke a regional language of
France (in today's France, only an estimated 10% still understand a regional language).[4]
Through the educational, social and military policies of the Third Republic, by 1914 the French had
been converted (as the historian Eugen Weber has put it) from a "country of peasants into a nation
of Frenchmen". By 1914, most French could read French and the use of regional languages had
greatly decreased; the role of the Catholic Church in public life had been radically diminished; a
sense of national identity and pride was actively taught. The anti-clericalism of the Third Republic
profoundly changed French religious habits: in one case study for the city of Limoges comparing
the years 1899 with 1914, it was found that baptisms decreased from 98% to 60%, and civil
marriages before a town official increased from 14% to 60%.
French economic history since its late 18th century Revolution was tied to three major events and
trends: the Napoleonic Era, the competition with Britain and its other neighbors in regards to
'industrialization', and the 'total wars' of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Quantitative
analysis of output data shows the French per capita growth rates were slightly smaller than Britain.
However the British population tripled in size, while France grew by only third – so the overall
British economy grew much faster. François Crouzet has summarized the cycles of French per
capita economic growth in 1815–1913 as:[5]
For the 1870–1913 era, Angus Maddison gives growth rates for 12 Western advanced countries –
10 in Europe plus the United States and Canada.[6] In terms of per capita growth, France was
about average. However again its population growth was very slow, so as far as the growth rate in
total size of the economy France was in next to the last place, just ahead of Italy. The 12 countries
averaged 2.7% growth per year in total output, but France only averaged 1.6% growth.[7] Crouzet
concludes that the
average size of industrial undertakings was smaller in France than in other advanced
countries; that machinery was generally less up to date, productivity lower, costs
higher. The domestic system and handicraft production long persisted, while big
modern factories were for long exceptional. Large lumps of the Ancien Régime
economy survived. ... On the whole, the qualitative lag between the British and French
economy ... persisted during the whole period under consideration, and later on a
similar lag developed between France and some other countries—Belgium, Germany,
the United States. France did not succeed in catching up with Britain, but was
overtaken by several of her rivals.[8]
Louis XVI shut the Salle des États where the Assembly met. The Assembly moved their
deliberations to the king's tennis court, where they proceeded to swear the Tennis Court Oath
(June 20, 1789), under which they agreed not to separate until they had given France a
constitution. A majority of the representatives of the clergy soon joined them, as did 47 members
of the nobility. By June 27 the royal party had overtly given in, although the military began to
arrive in large numbers around Paris and Versailles. On July 9 the Assembly reconstituted itself as
the National Constituent Assembly.[10]
On July 11, 1789, King Louis, acting under the influence of the
conservative nobles, as well as his wife, Marie Antoinette, and brother,
the Comte d'Artois, banished the reformist minister Necker and
completely reconstructed the ministry. Much of Paris, presuming this
to be the start of a royal coup, moved into open rebellion. Some of the
military joined the mob; others remained neutral. On July 14, 1789,
after four hours of combat, the insurgents seized the Bastille fortress,
killing its governor and several of his guards. The king and his military
supporters backed down, at least for a short time.
After this violence, nobles started to flee the country as émigrés, some
of whom began plotting civil war within the kingdom and agitating for
The Declaration of the a European coalition against France. Insurrection and the spirit of
Rights of Man and of the popular sovereignty spread throughout France. In rural areas, many
Citizen of 1789 went beyond this: some burned title-deeds and no small number of
châteaux, as part of a general agrarian insurrection known as "la
Grande Peur" (the Great Fear).
Looking to the United States Declaration of Independence for a model, on August 26, 1789, the
Assembly published the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. Like the U.S.
Declaration, it comprised a statement of principles rather than a constitution with legal effect. The
Assembly replaced the historic provinces with eighty-three départements, uniformly administered
and approximately equal to one another in extent and population; it also abolished the symbolic
paraphernalia of the Ancien Régime — armorial bearings, liveries, etc. — which further alienated
the more conservative nobles, and added to the ranks of the émigrés.
Louis XVI opposed the course of the revolution and on the night of June 20, 1791 the royal family
fled the Tuileries. However, the king was recognised at Varennes in the Meuse late on June 21 and
he and his family were brought back to Paris under guard. With most of the Assembly still
favouring a constitutional monarchy rather than a republic, the various groupings reached a
compromise which left Louis XVI little more than a figurehead: he had perforce to swear an oath to
the constitution, and a decree declared that retracting the oath, heading an army for the purpose of
making war upon the nation, or permitting anyone to do so in his name would amount to de facto
abdication.
The first half of 1793 went badly for the new French Republic, with the
French armies being driven out of Germany and the Austrian
Netherlands. In this situation, prices rose and the sans-culottes (poor
labourers and radical Jacobins) rioted; counter-revolutionary
activities began in some regions. This encouraged the Jacobins to seize
power through a parliamentary coup, backed up by force effected by Sans-culotte (left), compare
mobilising public support against the Girondist faction, and by figures wearing culottes
(right).
utilising the mob power of the Parisian sans-culottes. An alliance of
Jacobin and sans-culottes elements thus became the effective centre of
the new government. Policy became considerably more radical.
The government instituted the "levy-en-masse", where all able-
bodied men 18 and older were liable for military service. This
allowed France to field much larger armies than its enemies,
and soon the tide of war was reversed.
Directory (1795–1799)
The new constitution installed the Directoire and created
France's bicameral legislature. It was markedly more
conservative, dominated by the bourgeoise, and sought to
restore order and exclude the sans-culottes and other members
of the lower classes from political life.
Consulate (1799–1804)
Napoleon himself escaped back to France, where he led the coup d'état of November 1799, making
himself First Consul (his hapless troops remained in Egypt until they surrendered to a British
expedition in 1801 and were repatriated to France).
By that point, the War of the Second Coalition was in progress. The French suffered a string of
defeats in 1799, seeing their satellite republics in Italy overthrown and an invasion of Germany
beaten back. Attempts by the allies on Switzerland and the Netherlands failed however, and once
Napoleon returned to France, he began turning the tide on them. In 1801, the Peace of Lunéville
ended hostilities with Austria and Russia, and the Treaty of Amiens with Britain.
Portugal, an ally of Britain, was the only European country that openly refused to join. After the
Treaties of Tilsit of July 1807, the French launched an invasion through Spain to close this hole in
the Continental System. British troops arrived in Portugal, compelling the French to withdraw. A
renewed invasion the following year brought the British back, and at that point, Napoleon decided
to depose the Spanish king Charles IV and place his brother Joseph on the throne. This caused the
people of Spain to rise up in a patriotic revolt, beginning the Peninsular War. The British could
now gain a foothold on the Continent, and the war tied down considerable French resources,
contributing to Napoleon's eventual defeat.
Napoleon was at the height of his power in 1810–1812, with most of the European countries either
his allies, satellites, or annexed directly into France. After the defeat of Austria in the War of the
Fifth Coalition, Europe was at peace for 21⁄2 years except for the conflict in Spain. The emperor was
given an archduchess to marry by the Austrians, and she gave birth to his long-awaited son in 1811.
After eleven months of exile on the island of Elba in the Mediterranean, Napoleon escaped and
returned to France, where he was greeted with huge enthusiasm. Louis XVIII fled Paris, but the
one thing that would have given the emperor mass support, a return to the revolutionary
extremism of 1793–1794, was out of the question. Enthusiasm quickly waned, and as the allies
(then discussing the fate of Europe in Vienna) refused to negotiate with him, he had no choice but
to fight. At Waterloo, Napoleon was completely defeated by the British and Prussians, and
abdicated once again. This time, he was exiled to the island of Saint Helena in the South Atlantic,
where he remained until his death in 1821.
Louis XVIII, for the most part, accepted that much had changed.
However, he was pushed on his right by the Ultra-royalists, led by the
comte de Villèle, who condemned the Doctrinaires' attempt to
reconcile the Revolution with the monarchy through a constitutional
monarchy. Instead, the Chambre introuvable elected in 1815 banished
all Conventionnels who had voted Louis XVI's death and passed
several reactionary laws. Louis XVIII was forced to dissolve this
Chamber, dominated by the Ultras, in 1816, fearing a popular Louis XVIII reigned 1814–
uprising. The liberals thus governed until the 1820 assassination of 1824.
the duc de Berry, the nephew of the king and known supporter of the
Ultras, which brought Villèle's ultras back to power.[18]
Louis died on September the 16th in the year 1824 and was succeeded by his brother. Charles X of
France followed the "ultra" conservative line but was a much less effective coalition builder than
Louis XVIII. In May 1825 he staged a grand coronation ceremony in Reims which harked back to
the pre-1789 era. Freedom of the press was severely restricted. He compensated the families of the
nobles who had had their property taken during the Revolution. In
1830 the discontent caused by these changes and Charles X's
authoritarian nomination of the Ultra prince de Polignac as prime
minister led to his overthrow.[19]
The Restoration did not try to resurrect the Ancien Régime. Too much
had changed for that. The egalitarianism and liberalism of the
revolutionaries remained an important force and the autocracy and
hierarchy of the earlier era could not be fully restored. The economic
changes, which had been underway long before the revolution, had
been further enhanced during the years of turmoil and were firmly
entrenched by 1815. These changes had seen power shift from the
noble landowners to the urban merchants. The administrative reforms Charles Maurice de
of Napoleon, such as the Napoleonic Code and efficient bureaucracy, Talleyrand-Périgord, who
also remained in place. These changes produced a unified central served under several
government that was fiscally sound — for example, the indemnities regimes, depicted "floating
imposed by the victors were quickly paid off, and the occupation with the tide". Note the high
troops left quietly. The national government did not face strong heel of his left shoe,
regional parliaments or power centers and had solid control over all alluding both to his limp and
areas of France in sharp contrast with the chaotic situation the the Devil's hoof.
Bourbons had faced in the 1770s and 1780s. Restoration did not lessen
inequality in France, and it did not promote industrialisation. On the
whole, however, there was more wealth, and more political freedom for all classes. The
parliamentary system worked well. Restrictions on the press resembled those in most of Europe.
Frequent parliamentary transitions took place, but the losers were not executed or exiled. France
regained its place among the respected major powers, and its voice was heard in international
diplomacy. There was a new sense of humanitarianism, and popular piety. France began, on a
small scale, to rebuild the overseas empire it had lost in 1763.[20]
Louis-Philippe, who had flirted with liberalism in his youth, rejected much of the pomp and
circumstance of the Bourbons and surrounded himself with merchants and bankers. The July
Monarchy, however, remained a time of turmoil. A large group of Legitimists on the right
demanded the restoration of the Bourbons to the throne. On the left, Republicanism and, later
Socialism, remained a powerful force. Late in his reign Louis-Philippe became increasingly rigid
and dogmatic and his President of the Council, François Guizot, had become deeply unpopular, but
Louis-Philippe refused to remove him. The situation gradually escalated until the Revolutions of
1848 saw the fall of the monarchy and the creation of the Second Republic.[22]
During the years of the July Monarchy, enfranchisement roughly doubled, from 94,000 under
Charles X to more than 200,000 by 1848. However, this represented less than one percent of
population, and, as the requirements for voting were tax-based, only the wealthiest gained the
privilege. By implication, the enlarged enfranchisement tended to favor the wealthy merchant
bourgeoisie more than any other group. Beyond simply increasing their presence within the
Chamber of Deputies, this electoral enlargement provided the bourgeoisie the means by which to
challenge the nobility in legislative matters. Thus, while appearing to honor his pledge to increase
suffrage, Louis-Philippe acted primarily to empower his supporters and increase his hold over the
French Parliament. The inclusion of only the wealthiest also tended to undermine any possibility of
the growth of a radical faction in Parliament, effectively serving socially conservative ends.
The reformed Charter of 1830 limited the power of the King – stripping him of his ability to
propose and decree legislation, as well as limiting his executive authority. However, the King of the
French still believed in a version of monarchy that held the king as much more than a figurehead
for an elected Parliament, and as such, he was quite active in politics. One of the first acts of Louis-
Philippe in constructing his cabinet was to appoint the rather conservative Casimir Perier as the
premier of that body. Perier, a banker, was instrumental in shutting down many of the Republican
secret societies and labour unions that had formed during the early years of the regime. In
addition, he oversaw the dismemberment of the National Guard after it proved too supportive of
radical ideologies. He performed all of these actions, of course, with royal approval. He was once
quoted as saying that the source of French misery was the belief that there had been a revolution.
"No Monsieur", he said to another minister, "there has not been a revolution: there is simply a
change at the head of state."[23]
Further expressions of this conservative trend came under the supervision of Perier and the then
Minister of the Interior, François Guizot. The regime acknowledged early on that radicalism and
republicanism threatened it, undermining its laissez-faire policies. Thus, the Monarchy declared
the very term republican illegal in 1834. Guizot shut down republican clubs and disbanded
republican publications. Republicans within the cabinet, like the banker Dupont, were all but
excluded by Perier and his conservative clique. Distrusting the National Guard, Louis-Philippe
increased the size of the army and reformed it in order to ensure its loyalty to the government.
Though two factions always persisted in the cabinet, split between
liberal conservatives like Guizot (le parti de la Résistance, the Party of
Resistance) and liberal reformers like the aforementioned journalist
Adolphe Thiers (le parti du Mouvement, the Party of Movement), the
latter never gained prominence. After Perier came count Molé,
another conservative. After Molé came Thiers, a reformer later sacked
by Louis-Philippe after attempting to pursue an aggressive foreign
policy. After Thiers came the conservative Guizot. In particular, the
Guizot administration was marked by increasingly authoritarian
crackdowns on republicanism and dissent, and an increasingly pro-
business laissez-faire policy. This policy included protective tariffs that
defended the status quo and enriched French businessmen. Guizot's
government granted railway and mining contracts to the bourgeois Louis-Philippe I, the liberal
supporters of the government, and even contributing some of the and constitutional King of
start-up costs. As workers under these policies had no legal right to the French, brought to
assemble, unionize, or petition the government for increased pay or power by the July
decreased hours, the July Monarchy under Perier, Molé, and Guizot Revolution
generally proved detrimental to the lower classes. In fact, Guizot's
advice to those who were disenfranchised by the tax-based electoral
requirements was a simple "enrichissez-vous" – enrich yourself. The king himself was not very
popular either by the middle of the 1840s, and due to his appearance was widely referred to as the
"crowned pear". There was a considerable hero-worship of Napoleon during this era, and in 1841
his body was taken from Saint Helena and given a magnificent reburial in France.
Louis-Philippe conducted a pacifistic foreign policy. Shortly after he assumed power in 1830,
Belgium revolted against Dutch rule and proclaimed its independence. The king rejected the idea
of intervention there or any military activities outside France's borders. The only exception to this
was a war in Algeria which had been started by Charles X a few weeks before his overthrow on the
pretext of suppressing pirates in the Mediterranean. Louis-Philippe's government decided to
continue the conquest of that country, which took over a decade. By 1848, Algeria had been
declared an integral part of France.[24]
The revolution in France had brought together classes of wildly different interests: the bourgeoisie
desired electoral reforms (a democratic republic), socialist leaders (like Louis Blanc, Pierre Joseph
Proudhon and the radical Auguste Blanqui) asked for a "right to work" and the creation of national
workshops (a social welfare republic) and for France to liberate the oppressed peoples of Europe
(Poles and Italians), while moderates (like the aristocrat Alphonse de Lamartine) sought a middle
ground. Tensions between groups escalated, and in June 1848,
a working class insurrection in Paris cost the lives of 1500
workers and eliminated once and for all the dream of a social
welfare constitution.
Napoleon's distraction with Mexico prevented him from intervening in the Second Schleswig War
in 1864 and the Seven Weeks' War in 1866. Both of those conflicts saw Prussia establish itself as
the dominant power in Germany. Afterwards, tensions between France and Prussia grew,
especially in 1868 when the latter tried to place a Hohenzollern prince on the Spanish throne,
which was left vacant by a revolution there.
The Prussian chancellor Otto von Bismarck provoked Napoleon into declaring war on Prussia in
July 1870. The French troops were swiftly defeated in the following weeks, and on September 1, the
main army, which the emperor himself was with, was trapped at Sedan and forced to surrender. A
republic was quickly proclaimed in Paris, but the war was far from over. As it was clear that Prussia
would expect territorial concessions, the provisional government vowed to continue resistance.
The Prussians laid siege to Paris, and new armies mustered by France failed to alter this situation.
The French capital began experiencing severe food shortages, to the extent where even the animals
in the zoo were eaten. As the city was being bombarded by Prussian siege guns in January 1871,
King William of Prussia was proclaimed Emperor of Germany in the Hall of Mirrors at Versailles.
Shortly afterwards, Paris surrendered. The subsequent peace treaty was harsh. France ceded
Alsace and Lorraine to Germany and had to pay an indemnity of 5 billion francs. German troops
were to remain in the country until it was paid off. Meanwhile, the fallen Napoleon III went into
exile in England where he died in 1873.
Nathalie Lemel, a religious workwoman, and Elisabeth Dmitrieff, a young Russian aristocrat,
created the Union des femmes pour la défense de Paris et les soins aux blessés ("Women Union for
the Defense of Paris and Care to the Injured") on April 11, 1871. They demanded gender equality,
wage equality, right of divorce for women, right to laïque instruction (non-clerical) and for
professional training for girls. They also demanded suppression of the distinction between married
women and concubins, between legitimate and natural children, the abolition of prostitution—they
obtained the closing of the maisons de tolérance (legal unofficial brothels). The Women Union also
participated in several municipal commissions and organized cooperative workshops.[25]
The Paris Commune held power for only two months. Between May 21 and 28 the French army
reconquered the city in bitter fighting, in what became known as "la semaine sanglante" or "bloody
week". During the street fighting, the Communards were outnumbered four or five to one; they
lacked competent officers; and they had no plan for the defence of the city, so each neighbourhood
was left to defend itself. Their military commander, Louis Charles Delescluze, committed suicide
by dramatically standing atop a barricade on May 26. In the final days of the battle the
Communards set fire to the Tuileries Palace, the Hotel de Ville, the Palais de Justice, the Palace of
the Legion of Honor, and other prominent government buildings, and executed hostages they had
taken, including Georges Darboy, the archbishop of Paris.[26]
Army casualties from the beginning April through Bloody Week amounted to 837 dead and 6,424
wounded. Nearly seven thousand Communards were killed in combat or summarily executed by
army firing squads afterwards, and buried in the city cemeteries, and in temporary mass graves.[27]
About ten thousand Communards escaped and went into exile in Belgium, England, Switzerland
and the United States. Forty-five thousand prisoners were taken after the fall of the Commune.
Most were released, but twenty-three were sentenced to death, and about ten thousand were
sentenced to prison or deportation to New Caledonia or other prison colonies. All the prisoners
and exiles were amnestied in 1879 and 1880, and most returned to France, where some were
elected to the National Assembly.[28]
"Radicals" (1879–1914)
In 1880, Jules Guesde and Paul Lafargue, Marx's son-in-law, created the French Workers' Party
(Parti ouvrier français, or POF), the first Marxist party in France. Two years later, Paul Brousse's
Possibilistes split. A controversy arose in the French socialist movement and in the Second
International concerning "socialist participation in a bourgeois government", a theme which was
triggered by independent socialist Alexandre Millerand's participation to Radical-Socialist
Waldeck-Rousseau's cabinet around the start of the 20th century, which also included the marquis
de Galliffet, best known for his role as repressor of the 1871 Commune. While Jules Guesde was
opposed to this participation, which he saw as a trick, Jean Jaurès defended it, making him one of
the first social-democrat. Guesde's POF united itself in 1902 with the Parti socialiste de France,
and finally in 1905 all socialist tendencies, including Jaurès' Parti socialiste français, unified into
the Section française de l'Internationale ouvrière (SFIO), the "French section of the Second
International", itself formed in 1889 after the split between anarcho-syndicalists and Marxist
socialists which led to the dissolving of the First International (founded in London in 1864).
Bismarck had supported France becoming a republic in 1871, knowing that this would isolate the
defeated nation in Europe where most countries were monarchies. In an effort to break this
isolation, France went to great pains to woo Russia and the United Kingdom to its side, first by
means of the Franco-Russian Alliance of 1894, then the 1904 Entente Cordiale with the U.K, and
finally, with the signing of the Anglo-Russian Entente in 1907 this became the Triple Entente,
which eventually led France and the UK to enter World War I as Allies when Germany declared
war on Russia.
Distrust of Germany, faith in the army and antisemitism in parts of the French public opinion
combined to make the Dreyfus affair (the unjust trial and condemnation of a Jewish military
officer for treason) a political scandal of the utmost gravity. The nation was divided between
"dreyfusards" and "anti-dreyfusards" and far-right Catholic
agitators inflamed the situation even when proofs of Dreyfus'
innocence came to light. The writer Émile Zola published an
impassioned editorial on the injustice, and was himself
condemned by the government for libel. Once Dreyfus was
finally pardoned, the progressive legislature enacted the 1905
laws on laïcité which created a complete separation of church
and state and stripped churches of most of their property
rights.
The end of the 19th century saw the
spectacular growth of the French
The period and the end of the 19th and the beginning of the
empire (French troops landing in
20th century is often termed the Belle Époque. Although
Madagascar in 1895).
associated with cultural innovations and popular amusements
(cabaret, cancan, the cinema, new art forms such as
Impressionism and Art Nouveau), France was nevertheless a
nation divided internally on notions of religion, class, regionalisms and money, and on the
international front France came sometimes to the brink of war with the other imperial powers,
including Great Britain (the Fashoda Incident). Yet in 1905–1914 the French repeatedly elected
left-wing, pacifist parliaments, and French diplomacy took care to settle matters peacefully. France
was caught unprepared by the German declaration of war in 1914. The human and financial costs
of World War I would be catastrophic for the French.
Themes
Foreign relations
Colonialism
It became a moral mission to lift the world up to French standards by bringing Christianity and
French culture. In 1884 the leading exponent of colonialism, Jules Ferry declared: "The higher
races have a right over the lower races, they have a duty to civilise the inferior races." Full
citizenship rights – assimilation – was a long-term goal, but in practice colonial officials were
reluctant to extend full citizenship rights.[37] France sent small numbers of white permanent
settlers to its empire, in sharp contrast to Britain, Spain and Portugal. The notable exception was
Algeria, where the French settlers nonetheless always remained a powerful minority.
Africa
In the early 1880s, Pierre Savorgnan de Brazza was exploring the Kongo Kingdom for France, at
the same time Henry Morton Stanley explored it in on behalf of Leopold II of Belgium, who would
have it as his personal Congo Free State (see section below). France occupied Tunisia in May 1881.
In 1884, France occupied Guinea. French West Africa (AOF) was founded in 1895, and French
Equatorial Africa in 1910.[39][34]
During the Scramble for Africa in the 1870s and 1880s, the British and French generally
recognised each other's spheres of influence. The Suez Canal, initially built by the French, became
a joint British–French project in 1875, as both saw it as vital to maintaining their influence and
empires in Asia.[40] In 1882, ongoing civil disturbances in Egypt (see Urabi Revolt) prompted
Britain to intervene, extending a hand to France. France's expansionist Prime Minister Jules Ferry
was out of office, and the government was unwilling to send more than an intimidatory fleet to the
region. Britain established a protectorate, as France had a year earlier in Tunisia, and popular
opinion in France later put this action down to duplicity.[41] It was about this time that the two
nations established co-ownership of Vanuatu. The Anglo-French Convention of 1882 was also
signed to resolve territory disagreements in western Africa.
Fashoda Crisis
In the 1875–1898 era, serious tensions with Britain erupted over African issues. At several points
war was possible, but it never happened.[42] One brief but dangerous dispute occurred during the
Fashoda Incident when French troops tried to claim an area in the Southern Sudan, and a British
force purporting to be acting in the interests of the Khedive of Egypt arrived.[43] Under heavy
pressure the French withdrew securing Anglo-Egyptian control over the area. The status quo was
recognised by an agreement between the two states acknowledging British control over Egypt,
while France became the dominant power in Morocco. Dutch had failed in its main goals. P. M. H.
Bell says, "Between the two governments there was a brief battle of wills, with the British insisting
on immediate and unconditional French withdrawal from Fashoda.
The French had to accept these terms, amounting to a public
humiliation. ... Fashoda was long remembered in France as an
example of British brutality and injustice."[44][45][46][47]
Asia
France had colonies in Asia and looked for alliances and found in
Japan a possible ally. At Japan's request Paris sent military missions
in 1872–1880, in 1884–1889 and in 1918–1919 to help modernise the
Japanese army. Conflicts with China over Indochina climaxed during
the Sino-French War (1884–1885). Admiral Courbet destroyed the
Chinese fleet anchored at Foochow. The treaty ending the war, put
France in a protectorate over northern and central Vietnam, which it Contemporary illustration of
divided into Tonkin and Annam.[48] Captain Jean-Baptiste
Marchand's trek across
Africa
Literature
In addition, France produced a large body of prominent scientists during the late 19th century such
as Louis Pasteur and Marcellin Berthelot. Social sciences were less well-developed, but Gustave Le
Bon and Emile Durkheim were notable figures in this field.
Positivism survived as a movement until at least World War I, but beginning in the 1890s was
challenged by a rival school of thought that saw the return of Romantic ideas. A number of artists
came to disagree with the cold rationalism and logic of the Positivists, feeling that it ignored
human emotions. The so-called Symbolists included the poets Paul Verlaine and Stéphane
Mallarmé and an assortment of composers such as Georges Bizet and Camille Saint-Saëns who
then gave way to the more experimental music of Claude Debussy and Maurice Ravel.
Symbolist writers and philosophers included Paul Bourget, Maurice Barres, and Henri Bergson
plus the painters Paul Cézanne and Paul Gauguin. Bourget denounced Positivist ideas and
proclaimed that man's salvation did not come from science, but by the more traditional values of
God, family, and country. He espoused what he called "integral nationalism" and that traditional
institutions, reverence for one's ancestors, and the sacredness of the French soil were what needed
to be taught and promoted. Henri Bergson, whose lectures at the college de France became major
social gatherings among Parisians, criticized scientific rationalism and exalted man's irrational
drives, especially what he dubbed élan vital, distinguishing heroic men and nations from the
plodding masses.
The Symbolist Movement also affected the political climate of the nation: in the syndicalist beliefs
of Georges Sorel, in labor activism, and also a resurgent nationalism among French youth in the
years immediately preceding World War I. This new spirit brought a revival of belief in the Church
and a strong, fervent sense of patriotism. Also a new school of young artists emerged who
completely broke with Impressionism and favored a deep, intense subjectivism. Inspired by
Cézanne and Gauguin, Georges Braque, Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse, and Georges Rouault
entered the art scene so abruptly that they came to be known as the Fauves (Wild Ones).
Art
See also
Palace of Versailles
Paris in the 18th century
French Canada
Québécois people
Saint-Domingue
Saint Dominicans
Claude Monet, Impression, soleil
Haiti levant (Impression, Sunrise), 1872,
French Haitians oil on canvas, Musée Marmottan
Slavery in Saint-Domingue Monet, Paris. This painting became
Haitian Creole French the source of the movement's name,
Afro-Haitians after Louis Leroy's article The
Exhibition of the Impressionists
Americans in Haiti
satirically implied that the painting
Cap-Français was at most, a sketch.
French India
Louisiana (New France)
Louisiana Creole people
French Revolution
United States and the Haitian Revolution
French Revolutionary Wars
Maximilien Robespierre
Empress Joséphine
Jean-Baptiste Le Moyne, Sieur de Bienville
African Americans in France
Paris under Napoleon
Paris during the Restoration
Paris during the Second Empire
Paris in the Belle Époque
French Algeria
French language in Algeria
French protectorate of Tunisia
French Somaliland
French Indochina
French West Africa
French people in Senegal
French Madagascar
French Equatorial Africa
French protectorate in Morocco
French language in Morocco
Notes
1. Diebolt and Faustine.
2. Spengler, pp. 103.
3. Caron.
4. Weber, pp. 67–94.
5. Crouzet, pp. 171.
6. Maddison, pp. 28, 30, 37.
7. Crouzet, pp. 169.
8. Crouzet, pp. 172.
9. Mathews, pp. 115–152.
10. Doyle.
11. Betros, pp. 16–21.
12. Gottschalk.
13. Mathews, pp. 153–297.
14. Mathews, pp. 297–446.
15. Stewart, pp. 9–28.
16. Artz.
17. Rich, pp. 35–38.
18. Stewart, pp. 29–50.
19. Stewart, pp. 51–68.
20. Stewart, pp. 92–93.
21. Collingham and Alexander.
22. Howarth.
23. Collingham and Alexander, pp. 60.
24. Rich, pp. 58–61.
25. Women and the Commune.
26. Rougerie Paris libre, pp. 248–263.
27. Tombs, pp. 619–704.
28. Rougerie La Commune, pp. 118–120.
29. Tombs, pp. 679–704.
30. Anderson.
31. Cobban, pp. 23.
32. Pope Pius X.
33. Quinn.
34. Aldrich.
35. Roberts.
36. Chafer, pp. 84–85.
37. Okoth, pp. 318–319.
38. Taylor, pp. 286–292.
39. Pakenham.
40. Turner, pp. 26–27.
41. Randell.
42. Otte, pp. 693–714.
43. Brown.
44. Bell, pp. 3.
45. Taylor, pp. 381–388.
46. Brogan, pp. 321–326.
47. Langer, pp. 537–580.
48. Wakeman, pp. 189–191.
Works cited
"Women and the Commune" (https://web.archive.org/web/20070312190133/http://www.humani
te.fr/journal/2005-03-19/2005-03-19-458756). L'Humanité (in French). 19 March 2005.
Archived from the original (https://www.humanite.fr/journal/2005-03-19/2005-03-19-458756) on
12 March 2007. Retrieved 29 October 2017.
Aldrich, Robert (1996). Greater France: A History of French Overseas Expansion.
Anderson, Benedict (July–August 2004). "In the world-shadow of Bismarck and Nobel" (http://n
ewleftreview.org/II/28/benedict-anderson-in-the-world-shadow-of-bismarck-and-nobel). New
Left Review. II (28).
Artz, Frederick (1931). France Under the Bourbon Restoration, 1814–1830 (https://catalog.hath
itrust.org/Record/000643698). Russell & Russell.
Bell, P. M. H. (2014). France and Britain, 1900-1940: Entente and Estrangement (https://books.
google.com/books?id=mr-OAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA3). Routledge. ISBN 978-1-3178-9273-1.
Betros, Gemma (2010). "The French Revolution and the Catholic Church". History Review
(68).
Brogan, D.W. (1940). France under the Republic: The Development of Modern France (1870-
1939) (https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.155584).
Brown, Roger Glenn (1970). Fashoda reconsidered: the impact of domestic politics on French
policy in Africa, 1893-1898.
Caron, Francois (1979). An Economic History of Modern France.
Chafer, Tony (2002). The End of Empire in French West Africa: France's Successful
Decolonization? (https://books.google.com/books?id=9GseKljgaW0C&pg=PA84). Berg.
ISBN 978-1-8597-3557-2.
Cobban, Alfred (1965), "The rise of the third republic", in Cobban, Alfred (ed.), A history of
modern France: Volume 3: France of the Republics 1871-1962 (https://archive.org/details/histo
ryofmodernf0000cobb/page/23), Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books, ISBN 978-0-
1401-3827-6
Collingham, Hugh; Alexander, Robert S. (1988). The July monarchy: a political history of
France, 1830-1848.
Crouzet, François (1974). "French Economic Growth in the 19th century reconsidered".
History. 59 (196). doi:10.1111/j.1468-229X.1974.tb02212.x (https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1468-2
29X.1974.tb02212.x).
Diebolt, Claude; Faustine, Perrin (2016). Understanding Demographic Transitions. An
Overview of French Historical Statistics (https://www.springer.com/fr/book/9783319446509).
Springer.
Doyle, William (2002). The Oxford history of the French Revolution (https://archive.org/details/o
xfordhistoryoff00doyl). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1992-5298-5.
Gottschalk, Louis R. (1929). The Era of the French Revolution (1715–1815).
Howarth, T.E.B. (1975). Citizen King: Life of Louis-Philippe.
Langer, William L. (1951). The Diplomacy of Imperialism: 1890-1902.
Maddison, Angus (1964). Economic Growth in the West.
Mathews, Shailer (1923). The French Revolution 1789-1815 (https://archive.org/details/frenchr
evolution006713mbp) (2nd ed.). Longmans, Green and Co.
Okoth, Assa (2006). A History of Africa: African societies and the establishment of colonial rule,
1800-1915 (https://books.google.com/books?id=6knAMseFPpIC&pg=PA318). East African
Publishers. ISBN 978-9-9662-5357-6.
Otte, T. G. (2006). "From 'War-in-Sight' to Nearly War: Anglo–French Relations in the Age of
High Imperialism, 1875–1898". Diplomacy and Statecraft. 17 (4): 693–714.
doi:10.1080/09592290600943064 (https://doi.org/10.1080%2F09592290600943064).
S2CID 153431025 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:153431025).
Pakenham, Thomas (1991). The Scramble for Africa: White Man's Conquest of the Dark
Continent from 1876 to 1912.
Pope Pius X (1910). "Letter of Pope Pius X to the French Archbishops and Bishops 1910" (htt
p://www.the-pope.com/sillon.html). the-pope.com. Letter to. Where Peter is, There is the
Church.
Quinn, Frederick (2001). The French Overseas Empire.
Randell, Keith (1991). France: The Third Republic 1870–1914. Access to History. ISBN 978-0-
3405-5569-9.
Rich, Norman (1992). Great Power Diplomacy: 1814-1914.
Roberts, Stephen H. (1929). History of French Colonial Policy (1870-1925) (https://archive.org/
details/in.ernet.dli.2015.84402).
Rougerie, Jacques. Paris libre- 1871.
Rougerie, Jacques. La Commune de 1871.
Spengler, Joseph J. (1938). France Faces Depopulation (https://archive.org/details/francefaces
depop02spen). ISBN 978-0-8223-0422-7.
Stewart, John Hall (1968). The restoration era in France, 1814-1830.
Taylor, A. J. P. (1954). The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918.
Tombs, Robert (September 2012). "How bloody was La Semaine Sanglante of 1871? A
revision". The Historical Journal. 55 (3): 679–704. doi:10.1017/S0018246X12000222 (https://d
oi.org/10.1017%2FS0018246X12000222). S2CID 159831886 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/
CorpusID:159831886).
Turner, Barry (26 September 2012). Suez 1956: The Inside Story of the First Oil War (https://bo
oks.google.com/books?id=HmyIS4E3K_QC). Hodder & Stoughton. ISBN 978-1-4447-6485-7.
Wakeman Jr., Frederic (1975). The Fall of Imperial China.
Weber, Eugen (1976). Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870-
1914.
Further reading
Bury, J.P.T. (2003). France, 1814-1940.
Clapham, J. H. (1921). The Economic Development of France and Germany: 1815-1914 (http
s://archive.org/details/cu31924013709641). Cambridge [Eng.] The University press.
Dunham, Arthur Louis (1955). The Industrial Revolution in France, 1815–1848.
Echard, William E. (1985). Historical Dictionary of the French Second Empire, 1852-1870 (http
s://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000unse_c6c7). ISBN 978-0-3132-1136-2.
Furet, François (1995). Revolutionary France 1770-1880.
Gildea, Robert (2008). Children of the revolution: The French, 1799-1914.
Lucien Edward Henry (1882). "Reconciliation". The Royal Family of France: 81–85.
Wikidata Q107259201.
Hutton, Patrick H., ed. (1986). Historical Dictionary of the Third French Republic, 1870-1940 (ht
tps://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000unse_g3i3).
Langley, Michael (October 1972). "Bizerta to the Bight: The French in Africa". History Today:
733–739.
McPhee, Peter (1994). A social history of France, 1780-1880.
Milward, A.; Saul, S.B. (1977). The development of the economies of continental Europe: 1850-
1914. pp. 71–141.
Newman, E.L.; Simpson, R.L., eds. (1987). Historical Dictionary of France from the 1815
Restoration to the Second Empire (https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0001unse).
ISBN 978-0-3132-2751-6.
O'Brien, Patrick; Caglar, Keyder (2011). Economic growth in Britain and France 1780-1914: two
paths to the Twentieth Century.
Pilbeam, Pamela (1990). The Middle Classes in Europe, 1789-1914: France, Germany, Italy,
and Russia. Lyceum books.
Plessis, Alain (1985). The rise and fall of the Second Empire, 1852-1871.
Price, Roger (1987). A social history of nineteenth-century France.
Spitzer, Alan B. (2014). The French generation of 1820.
Tombs, Robert (2014). France 1814-1914.
Weber, Eugen (1979). Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernisation of Rural France, 1870-
1914. London: Chatto and Windus.
Wright, Gordon (1995). France in Modern Times. New York: Norton. ISBN 0-3939-5582-6.
Zeldin, Theodore (1977). France, 1848-1945.
Historiography
Sauvigny, G. de Bertier de (Spring 1981). "The Bourbon Restoration: One Century of French
Historiography". French Historical Studies. 12 (1): 41–67. doi:10.2307/286306 (https://doi.org/1
0.2307%2F286306). JSTOR 286306 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/286306).