Whitepaper - LNMO-graphite - 5k
Whitepaper - LNMO-graphite - 5k
Whitepaper - LNMO-graphite - 5k
A GAME-CHANGING
APPROACH TO
STABLE CYCLING OF
LNMO-GRAPHITE CELLS
Authors:
Piotr Jankowski, Scientist
Christian Fink Elkjær, Cell Development Manager
Jonathan Højberg, R&D Director
Topsoe A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 3
CONCLUSION 10
METHODS 11
Authors:
The need for cost-effective and high-performance into the SEI layer which increases impedance. This is
energy storage solutions has been a driving force in one of several phenomena generalized as “chemical
advancing battery technology. In this context, the crosstalk” where electrolyte-soluble species
combination of a high-voltage cathode material, produced on one electrode migrate to the other
like Lithium Nickel Manganese Oxide (LNMO) electrode and change cell resistance and/or lithium
with graphite as the anode, has emerged as an inventory, i.e., amount of active lithium.
exceptionally promising system for automotive
application. This paper will introduce “non-chemical crosstalk”
that relates to the interplay between state of charge
While LNMO-graphite cells present great promise at the electrodes which is largely governed by
for the future, insufficient capacity retention still N/P ratio and voltage window. Using 3-electrode
hinders their full commercialization. As reported in measurements, we show how optimization of these
literature1, the capacity retention is mainly limited by parameters drastically reduces the stress on each
the interplay between the graphite anode and the electrode and minimizes the chemical crosstalk,
LNMO cathode, often referred to as “crosstalk”. The resulting in significantly improved capacity retention.
most referred crosstalk is dissolution of Mn from the
cathode that migrates to the anode and integrates
To understand the origin of non-chemical crosstalk, • The maintained constant current control in the
it is important to understand how the LNMO- LNMO cell until a higher state of charge leads to
graphite system is different compared to other drop of the anode voltage. At C/2 charge, this
common cathode chemistries. Figure 1 shows a causes the potential to reach below 0 V vs. Li/Li+.
comparison between half- and full-cell voltage This is not observed for the NMC cell.
profiles of LNMO-graphite and NMC532-graphite at
both slow (C/10, D/10) and fast (C/2, 1D) cycles. The In essence, LNMO cathode with flat potential profile
three main observations when comparing the two and easily accessible lithium cations allows to
systems are: maintain the CC charging step until even 98% SOC
at current rate C/2. Such conditions can easily lead
• Anode potential profiles are similar for both to early Li-plating on the anode electrode.
systems at low current conditions.
• The NMC cell reaches CV phase of charging
earlier than the LNMO cell. It is very pronounced
at fast cycling, but observable also for slow cycles.
Potential / V LNMO: full cell NMC: full cell Potential / V LNMO: full cell NMC: full cell
LNMO: cathode NMC: cathode LNMO: cathode NMC: cathode
LNMO: graphite NMC: graphite LNMO: graphite NMC: graphite
5 5
4 4
0.35
3 3 0.30
0.25
0.20
2 2
0.15
0.10
1 1 0.05
0.00
0 0
Left: Slow cycle (2nd cycle) at C/10 and D/10 and Right: Faster cycle (3rd cycle) at C/2 and 1D. Results are obtained using 3 electrode PAT-CELLs
(EL-CELL) with 2 cycles C/10 and D/10 followed by cycling at C/2 and 1D. Electrolyte: 1M LiPF6 EC:DEC (1:1 vol.) + 1% LiBOB. Balancing: N/P = 1.20.
Temperature: 25°C.
4
3 Ecell=3.5V Ecell=3.5V
Ecell=3.5V 3
2
2
1
1
0 0
47 48 49 111 112 113 177 178 179
Cycle time /h Cycle time /h Cycle time /h -1
0 20 40 60 80 100
Cycle
Left potential profile for anode and cathode of LNMO-graphite cell in cycles 5, 25, and 45, and right maximum and minimum potentials experienced
by anode and cathode for each cycle. Results are obtained using 3 electrode PAT-CELLs (EL-CELL) with 2 cycles C/10 and D/10 followed by cycling at
C/2 and 1D. Electrolyte: 1M LiPF6 EC:DEC (1:1 vol.) + 1% LiBOB. Balancing: N/P = 1.20. Temperature: 25°C.
70
Limiting anode potential to 0.1-0.8 V vs. Li/Li+ limits
capacity of the anode with around 30%. To maintain
60
high capacity of the cell (in mAh/gLNMO), it is therefore
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
necessary to increase capacity of the anode. For the
graphite and LNMO used in this study, the optimal Cycle number
Monitoring anode potential during cycling is not Herein we would like to demonstrate the first step
feasible for commercial applications, and it is in that direction, obtained by reducing the upper
therefore necessary to translate the learnings from voltage cut-off potential and using an N/P ratio of
the 3-electrode system to normal cells without a 1.20. Figure 4 shows how the decrease in cut-off
reference electrode. potential will eventually compromise the available
capacity. The three selected upper cut-off potentials
Options to improve anode control could be are 4.80 V, 4.70 V, and 4.64 V. 4.80 V is selected
advanced cycling protocols, such as e.g., multistage as a reference often used in literature. 4.70 V is
constant current, pulse, or current modulated selected to decrease current towards end of charge
charging, to replicate potential and current profiles by entering CV step earlier and without significantly
obtained in anode-control mode in standard LNMO- compromise in capacity. 4.64 V is selected as the
graphite cells. best way to mimic results in the 3-electrode cell,
where the charge is terminated exactly as the anode
reaches 0.1 V vs. Li/Li+. As marked in Figure 4, a cut-
off voltage of 4.64 V in a cell with N/P ratio 1.2 will
FIGURE 4 : Charge potential profiles of LNMO be reached when the anode potential (difference
and full cell in LNMO-graphite cell between cathode potential and full cell potential)
changes from slightly above 0.12 V vs. Li/Li+ to
around 0.08 V vs. Li/Li+ as the cathode potential is
4.74 V vs. Li/Li+ in this region.
Potential / V Full cell / V
Cathode / V
An important effect of changing the upper voltage
4.85 cut-off is that the current profile towards end of
Ecell = 4.80 V charge is modified significantly. Figure 5 shows
4.80 capacity vs. time for the three conditions. The slope
4.75
corresponds to the current, and the CV step is
initiated when the slope decreases from the initial
Ecell = 4.70 V
4.70 straight line. As further substantiated in Table 1,
0.1 V
the CC charging step is reduced from 93% down
4.65 Ecell = 4.64 V
to 63%. This means that lowering the upper cutoff
4.60
voltage decreases the available capacity and
increases time at CV from 16% to 53%. The total
4.55 charging time is almost unchanged as the capacity
is 20% less for the upper cut-off voltage of 4.64 V
0 25 50 75 100 125
compared to 4.80 V.
Capacity / mAh/g
Capacity / mAh/g 3.50-4.80 V 3.50-4.64 V Full range capacity / mAh/g 3.50-4.80 V 3.50-4.64 V
Full range capacity / mAh/g 3.50-4.80 V
3.50-4.70 V 3.50-4.64 V
3.50-4.70 V
3.50-4.70 V
120 125
125
100 120
120
80 115
115
60 110
110
40 105
105
20 100
100
95
0 95
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Cycle number
Time / h Cycle number
Charge at C/2 with varying upper cut-off voltage of 4.80 V, 4.70 Results are obtained in 2 electrode coin cells cycled at C/2 and
V and 4.64 V, respectively. Results are obtained in 2 electrode 1D with varying upper cut-off voltage of 4.80 V, 4.70 V and 4.64
coin cells. Electrolyte: 1M LiPF6 EC:DEC (1:1 vol.) + 1% LiBOB. V, respectively. Full range capacity is measured every 50th cycle
Balancing: N/P = 1.20. Temperature: 25°C. between 3.50 V and 4.80 V at C/10 and D/10. Electrolyte: 1M LiPF6
EC:DEC (1:1 vol.) + 1% LiBOB. Balancing: N/P = 1.20. Temperature:
25°C.
TABEL 1: Key values for charge at C/2 with To provide periodical ‘check’ of the available
different upper cut-off voltages capacity, the cells were cycled slowly (C/10, D/10)
in the full voltage range of 3.5 V–4.8 V every 50
Potential Qtotal QCC/ ttotal tCV/ cycles. Figure 6 shows capacities at slow cycles of
range [V] [mAh/g] Qtotal [h] ttotal the three conditions and comparing these, it is clear
that milder cycling significantly improves capacity
3.50-4.80 110.9 93% 1.66 16% retention. This result is further substantiated in Table
2 that shows capacities and capacity retention
3.50-4.70 107.0 85% 1.64 25% corresponding to the three conditions. On one hand,
the available capacity is lower when the upper cut-
3.50-4.64 87.0 63% 1.61 53% off is decreased, while at the same time the capacity
retention is much better, decreasing the capacity
Results are obtained in 2 electrode coin cells at C/2 (5th cycle) fade at slow cycles and full voltage range from 5.6
with varying upper cut-off voltage of 4.80 V, 4.70 V and 4.64 mAh/g to 1.5 mAh/g in the first 50 cycles. Loss of
V, respectively. Electrolyte: 1M LiPF6 EC:DEC (1:1 vol.) + 1% LiBOB.
Balancing: N/P = 1.20. Temperature: 25°C. capacity speeds up in subsequent cycle ranges, but
is always the slowest when lower cut-off voltage is
applied.
Potential range Qfull (cycle 1) Qlimited (cycle 5) Capacity loss cycles Capacity loss cycles Capacity loss cycles
[V] [mAh/g] [mAh/g] 2-52 52-102 102-152
[mAh/g] [mAh/g] [mAh/g]
Results are obtained in 2 electrode coin cells with varying upper cut-off voltage of 4.80 V, 4.70 V and 4.64 V, respectively.
Electrolyte: 1M LiPF6 EC:DEC (1:1 vol.) + 1% LiBOB. Balancing: N/P = 1.20. Temperature: 25°C.
To better understand how the voltage window FIGURE 7: Cell resistance during cycling
impact the cell, intermittent current interruption (ICI)
method was used to monitor cell resistance.
Increase in cell resistance / ohm 3.50-4.80 V 3.50-4.64 V
3.50-4.70 V
Figure 7 shows ICI measurements conducted
40
during test of the three conditions and reveals that
resistance build-up is much more significant at high
upper voltage cut-off, while the cell cycled to 4.64 30
V did not show any noticeable increase in resistance
for 100 cycles. After cycle 102 performed in full range 20
3.50–4.80 V, the build-up in resistance speeds up.
10
Thus, we can only assume that, even a single
slow cycling in full range causes some irreversible
changes in the cell, and the overall performance of 0
the cell would be better if these cycles were skipped.
LNMO electrodes with loading of around 1 mAh/cm2 2-electrode measurements were performed in coin-
were prepared from TOPSOE LNMO material, using cell geometry, using Celgard H2010 separator and
procedures described in previous publications3. 20 µL electrolyte: 1M LiPF6 in EC:DEC (vol. 1:1) + 1%
LiBOB. Cycling was performed at stable 25 °C:
3-electrode measurements were performed using
PAT-CELL provided by EL-CELL®, using Freudenberg • First two cycles C/10, D/10
Viledon FS 2226E + Lydall Solupor 5P09B separator • Subsequent cycles were performed using C/2
and 100 µL electrolyte: 1M LiPF6 in EC:DEC (vol. 1:1) + (+ CV until current below C/10), 1D
1% LiBOB. Cycling was performed at stable 25 °C: • Every 50 cycle, the slow cycle was performed:
C/10, D/10
• First two cycles C/10 (+ CV until current below Potential range for slow cycles was set to
C/20), D/10 (+ CV until current below D/20); deep 3.50–4.80 V for all cells, and fast cycles were
stabilization of current was done to perform performed in range 3.50–4.80 V, 3.50–4.70 V
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy at or 3.50–4.64 V
both charged and discharged state • The cell resistances were monitored during
• Subsequent cycles were performed using C/2 discharge of each cycle using ICI procedure4
(+ CV until current below C/20), 1D (+ CV until
current below D/20)
• Potential range was set to 3.50–4.80 V for LNMO-
graphite (cell control), 3.00–4.40 V for NMC532-
graphite (cell control), 0.80–0.10 V for LNMO-
graphite (anode control)
REFERENCES
1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.069
2
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201801427
3
https://www.topsoe.com/hubfs/Topsoe_status_LNMO.pdf
4
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140888
Topsoe A/S,
Haldor Topsøes Allé 1
2800 Kongens Lyngby
Denmark
Tel. +45 45 27 20 00
CVR no. 41 85 38 16
0389.2023/Rev.0