0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views2 pages

Optimization Using The Hessian

Uploaded by

Ayobami Olatunji
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views2 pages

Optimization Using The Hessian

Uploaded by

Ayobami Olatunji
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

OPTIMIZATION USING THE HESSIAN

Named after Ludwig Otto Hesse (a 19th century German mathematician), the Hessian comprises
of the second-order partial derivatives of a multivariate function. The Hessian can test for second-
order condition.
Given a multivariate function Y = f(x1 , x2 , x3 ), the Hessian is
∂11 ∂12 ∂13
|H| = |∂21 ∂22 ∂23 | where the elements are the second-order partial derivatives.
∂31 ∂32 ∂33
Conditions for a minimum or maximum depend on the signs of the first, second, and third
principal minors: |H1 |, |H2 | and |H3 |.
The second-order conditions for a minimum:
∂11 ∂12
|H1 | = ∂11 > 0 |H2 | = | |>0 |H3 | = |H| > 0
∂21 ∂22
All the principal minors of |H| are positive, |H| is positive definite, which fulfills the second-order
conditions for a minimum.
The second-order conditions for a maximum:
∂11 ∂12
|H1 | = ∂11 < 0 |H2 | = | |>0 |H3 | = |H| < 0
∂21 ∂22
All the principal minors of |H| alternate in sign between negative and positive. |H| is negative
definite, which fulfills the second-order conditions for maximum.
EXAMPLE 1.
Optimize the function y = −3x12 + 17x1 + x1 x3 − x22 + 2x2 + 2x2 x3 − 4x32 + x3 using the
Hessian to test the second-order conditions.
SOLUTION
The first-order conditions:
∂y ∂y
= −6x1 + 17 + x3 = 0 = −2x2 + 2 + 2x3 = 0
∂x1 ∂x2

∂y
= x1 + 2x2 − 8x3 + 1 = 0
∂x3

−6 0 1 x1 −17
In matrix form, [ 0 −2 2 ] [x2 ] = [ −2 ]
1 2 −8 x3 −1
Use Cramer’s rule,
|A1 | −210 |A2 | −140 |A3 | −70
x̅1 = = =3 x̅2 = =2 x̅3 = = =1
|A| −70 |A| −70 |A| −70
To test the second-order conditions, take the second partial derivatives from the first-order
conditions to form the Hessian.
−6 0 1
Thus, |H| = | 0 −2 2|
1 2 −8
|H| has the same elements as |A| since the first-order partials are linear. To apply the Hessian
test, check the signs of the first, second and third principal minors,
−6 0
|H1 | = −6 < 0 |H2 | = | | = 12 > 0 |H3 | = |H| = |A| = −70 < 0
0 −2
The principal minors of |H| alternate in sign between negative and positive. |H| is negative
definite, which fulfills the second-order conditions for maximum.
So, H is maximized at 𝐱̅ 𝟏 = 𝟑, 𝐱̅ 𝟐 = 𝟐, and 𝐱̅ 𝟑 = 𝟏.
Given the demand functions and the cost function
EXAMPLE 2.
Given the demand functions and the cost function
P1 = 22 − 3Q1 − Q2 − 2Q3 P2 = 29 − Q1 − 4Q2 P3 = 27 − Q2 − 3Q3
1
TC = 2Q21 + Q1 Q2 + Q22 + Q2 Q3 + 2 Q23

Maximize profits by (a) using Cramer’s rule for the first-order condition, and (b) using the
Hessian for the second-order condition.
a) π = (22 − 3Q1 − Q2 − 2Q3 )Q1 + (29 − Q1 − 4Q2 )Q2 + (27−Q2 − 3Q3 )Q3 −
1
(2Q21 + Q1 Q2 + Q22 + Q2 Q3 + 2 Q23 )
7
= 22Q1 + 29Q2 + 27Q3 − 3Q1 Q2 − 2Q2 Q3 − 2Q1 Q3 − 5Q21 − 5Q22 − Q23
2
π1 = 22 − 3Q2 − 2Q3 − 10Q1 = 0 π2 = 29 − 3Q1 − 2Q3 − 10Q2 = 0
π3 = 27 − 2Q2 − 2Q1 − 7Q3 = 0
−10 −3 −2 Q1 −22
In matrix form, [ −3 −10 −2] [Q2 ] = [−29]
−2 −2 −7 Q3 −27
Use Cramer’s rule:
̅ 1 = |A1| = −581 = 1
Thus, Q ̅ 2 = |A2 | = −1162 = 2
Q ̅ 3 = |A3| = −1743 = 3
Q
|A| −581 |A| −581 |A| −581

−10 −3 −2
b) |H| = | −3 −10 −2|
−2 −2 −7
Where |H1 | = −𝟏𝟎, |H2 | = 𝟗1, and |H3 | = |H| = |A| = −𝟓𝟖𝟏. H is maximized.

You might also like