Portfolio - Maria Silos Molina - 20196294
Portfolio - Maria Silos Molina - 20196294
Portfolio - Maria Silos Molina - 20196294
1. SITE ANALYSIS 3
1.1. LOCATION 4
1.2. POPULATION 5
1.3. TRANSPORTATION 6
1.4. CLIMATE 7
4. ANALYSIS 13
4.1. SUN PATHS 14
4.2. SUN AND SHADING 18
4.3. SKYLIGHT 21
4.4 DAYLIGHT 22
4.5. COMFORT TEMPERATURE 24
4.6. ENERGY USE 26
4.7. VENTILATION 29
4.8. THERMAL ENVELOPE 32
4.9. PHPP (Passive House Planning Package) 33
4.10. IES TESTING 37
5. DESIGN PROPOSAL 42
7. REFERENCES 51
1.1 LOCATION
BASIN
PHASE 1
(COMPLETED)
RIVER TRENT
Image shared by Blueprint
1.2 POPULATION
Education Levels
The education levels where the school site is
located are divided by the River Trent where it
shows a big difference between the north part
of the river and the south part.
In the north part the education levels are very
low, in contrast with the south part where
education levels are very high. Education
More tan half the population don’t strategies should be implemented for the
have access to a car. This actually education gap to reduce.
helps in the car use reduction
goals, and to encourage public
transport use, cycling and walking.
Nottingham has
the highest bus
use in England
outside London. Source from: Insight Mapping Nottingham City Council Childhood Obesity
That is helpful too Ethnic Groups
in the reduction of
car use and
promotion of
public transport.
Nottingham has 1 Source: Public Health England – National Childhood Measurement Programme
(NCMP) Obesity data and tools
in 8 people that
are students, so Obesity in children of Nottingham is very
we need to high compared with the rest of England.
implement more We have to encourage more walking
schools to reach and cycling to prevent obesity.
education to all
In Nottingham is a varied ethnicity. We
people.
have to take advantage of this and
bring people together to learn things
Images source from: https://www.nottinghaminsight.org.uk/population/
Source from: https://www.nottinghaminsight.org.uk/Document- form each other.
Library/Document-Library/aAXGNJs
Accessed on July 2019
1.3 TRANSPORTATION
CAR BUS
- The fastest way is getting by car, it takes 4 min, but it is not worth the - The bus takes about 26 CYCLING WALKING
travel by car. min, there is no direct
route to Trent Basin.
- There is no bus because it is really near.
- Cycling is also a fast way
- Cycling is the fastest way to get to Trent Basin, it takes about 3 min to get to Trent Basin, it
takes about 9 min
- Walking takes about 11 min, it is another good way to get to Trent Basin.
- Walking takes longer to
get to Trent Basin, it takes
almost 30 min.
1.4 CLIMATE
1.4 CLIMATE
The main access at south remained at south, I rotated the school so it was facing south to Straight access creating a
but the car park changed it to the north so it have a more optimum use of sun light and secondary one for reception
can work like a buffer for noise of the busy heat gains, with their respective shades. and infant children.
road.
13/12/2019 María Silos Molina | 20196294 11
3. CONCEPT AND DESIGN PROCESS
RIVER TRENT
12:00 PM
3:00 PM
3:00 PM
12:00 PM
3:00 PM
First strategy
In the first strategy I analyzed the sun altitude to see what length of horizontal shade I should use to
avoid overheating in summer and at some hours in spring and autumn, as my façade is facing south. I
wanted to implement a 2.20m long shade where vegetation could grow but allow some sun in spring
and autumn. But I realized that the sun gain will be too much anyway because the classroom would
have direct solar contact.
Second strategy
In the second strategy I inverted the corridor to the south part to act as a buffer for the solar radiation.
The sun will reach the corridor during the day but not the classroom that will be allowed solar radiation
at morning to gain heat for cold mornings and it will be blocked during warmer hours in midday and
afternoon.
North South
In the first strategy in summer the solar radiation will be blocked by the horizontal shading and the
vegetation grown on it.
In the second strategy solar radiation will reach the corridor but not the classrooms, which will be
protected form solar radiation and in that way avoid overheating.
During winter in the first strategy the low sun altitude is able to reach the classroom and warm the
room.
In the second strategy happens the same thing, the corridor is not an obstacle as solar radiation can
reach the classrooms and warm them.
OPTION 1 (NORTH) OPTION 1.1 (SOUTH) OPTION 1.2 (SOUTH) OPTION 2 (NORTH) OPTION 2 (SOUTH)
The artificial sky is able to reproduce standard For option 1 I made two different south facades to see which one will have a
overcast sky conditions with the CIE luminance better performance with natural light. Option 1.1 is the least lit, but in general
distribution. With a model we can get a pretty good both options were lacking some light, so I made another design.
idea of how lit in this sky conditions the room will be. In option 2 I added bigger skylights and increased the window area. In the
pictures can be seen that the room is more lit than the ones in option 1.
SEFAIRA TESTING
JUNE 21
12:00 PM
DECEMBER 21
12:00 PM
Lux levels measured at 0.85 meters above the floor plate. Minimum requirement for
illuminance for schools: 300 lux
(CIBSE Guide A Standards, p.1-22)
SEFAIRA TESTING
JUNE 21
Option 2.1 and option 2.2 perform
12:00 PM
almost the same way, just option 2.1
has more over lit area.
Lux levels measured at 0.85 meters above the floor plate. Minimum requirement for
illuminance for schools: 300 lux
(CIBSE Guide A Standards)
CIBSE stablished comfort temperature depending in the type of Through different strategies we can keep
space, in our case are school spaces. this comfort temperatures and the
Comfort temperatures for school spaces: challenge is to maintain them through
Classrooms: Kitchen: the changes of the seasons, through
winter is 19°C-22°C winter is 17°C-19°C ventilation, daylight, solar radiation and
summer 21°C-23°C summer 21°C-23°C thermal envelope
Offices: Sports Hall:
winter is 21°C-23°C 17°C
summer 22°C-24°C
Thermal Envelope
80
60
- Floor: insulated 0.42 W/m3-k well insulated 0.15 W/m3-k
40 - Roof: 0.27 W/m3-k - Glazing U-factor: 0.7 W/m3-k
20 - Glazing U-factor: 1.99 W/m3-k - Lighting: good 7.1 W/m2
0 - Lighting: standard 15 W/m2 - Infiltration rate: best practice
OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 OPTION 4 OPTION 5 - Infiltration rate: normal practice 3 m3/m2h
Before After 7.2 m3/m2h
ENERGY SEGMENTS
15000
10000
kWh/yr
5000
0
OPTION 4 OPTION 5 OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 OPTION 4 OPTION 5
DAYLIGHTING
120
OPTION 5
8000
3 m3/m2h to “extremely tight building” 0.6
6000
m3/m2h
4000
2000
After this changes have been made the Energy
0
Use Intensity improved from 63 kWh/m2/yr to 56
Design 2, vertical sky OPTION 5.1 OPTION 5.2
kWh/m2/yr, reaching lower levels required for the
lights in north facade HEATING COOLING LIGHTNING
2030 challenge.
Design 1
Buoyancy + wind driven Buoyancy driven
For the ventilation tries in Optivent
I analyzed 2 different design,
each one with 3 different
variables in the outlet position to
OPTION 1.1
see which one was the best
Outlet in lower roof
option to ventilate the classrooms
and at the same time reach
comfortable levels established by
ASHRAE standard 55-2013
Conclusions:
- Option 1.1 is cooler to reach
comfort levels.
OPTION 1.3 - Option 2.2 reaches the
Outlet in lower wall comfort levels but it can still be
enhanced.
- For design 1 option 1.3 reach
the most comfortable levels
that comply with ASHRAE
Standard 55-2013.
Design 2
Buoyancy + wind driven Buoyancy driven
Conclusions:
- Option 2.1 and 2.2 are also
OPTION 2.1 cooler to reach comfort
Horizontal outlet in levels.
roof - For design 2 option 2.3 reach
the most comfortable levels
that comply with ASHRAE
Standard 55-2013.
OPTION 2.2
- Every option comply with the
Vertical outlet in
required air flow rate for fresh
roof
air.
- Options in design 2 are the
nearest to comply with the
required air flow rates for
cooling.
OPTION 2.3
Outlet in wall
1.5 1.5
1 1
0.5 0.5
0 0
Option 1.1 Option 1.2 Option 1.3 Option 2.1 Option 2.2 Option 2.3 Option 1.1 Option 1.2 Option 1.3 Option 2.1 Option 2.2 Option 2.3
Required for fresh air Required for cooling Achieved Required for fresh air Required for cooling Achieved
Isothermal
Window installation below with
Graph
wooden block (ΨInstallation =
0.053 W / mK), or polyurethane
recycling (ΨInstallation = 0.037
W / mK) or mounting angles
(ΨInstallation = 0.020 W / mK)
Image from: Part 1 of the final report: Image from: Part 1 of the final report: Design Image from: Air leakages through cross laminated
Image from:
Design Guide for Passive Houses Guide for Passive Houses timber (CLT) constructions
https://www.specifiedby.com/olsen-
doors-windows-ltd/elite-92-tilt-turn
Construction section
Lambda Values (W/mK): The materials I am using for the wall
- Triple Glazing: 0.80 structure are all wood materials.
I chose this because of an aesthetic
issue, how it looks naturally but also
Lambda Values (W/mK): because of their benefits, they are
- Cross laminated timber: 0.13 – 100mm sustainable materials, have good
- Wood Fibre 0.038 – 300mm lambda values that help to the thermal
- Durelis vapourblock 0.13 – 12mm envelope and low cost.
- Timber: 0.13 – 30mm
Source from: http://www.greenspec.co.uk/building-design/woodfibre-insulation-intro/
OPTION 1 OPTION 2
Heat Balance Heat Balance
U values: U values:
Image source: BRE Passivhaus primer: Designer’s guide Wall: 0.111 Wall: 0.111
A guide for the design team and local authorities
Roof: 0.15 Roof: 0.10
Floor: 0.15 Floor: 0.10
Passivhaus recommends a Glazing: 0.8 Glazing: 0.6
form factor of ≤ 3. Exterior wall thickness: Exterior wall thickness:
442mm 442mm
RIBA CLIMATE CHALLENGE
The first try I did it with this U-values and an In the second try I improved all U-values to their
for 2030 for operational
insulation thickness of 300mm and found that I optimum levels. Heat losses and heat gains
energy is 0-35kWh/m²/yr.
had too much heat gains and heat losses. reduced a significant amount.
OPTION 3 OPTION 4
Heat Balance Heat Balance
Annual heat demand: Annual heat demand:
17.20 kWh/m²a 16.90 kWh/m²a
U values (W/m2K) :
U values (W/m2K):
Wall: 0.111
Wall: 0.111
Roof: 0.10
Roof: 0.10
Floor: 0.10
Floor: 0.10
Glazing: 0.6
Glazing: 0.6
Exterior wall
Exterior wall
thickness: 442mm
thickness: 442mm
Reduce north sky Reduce north sky Reduce north
lights size: from lights size: from windows size: from
1.80m to 1.50m 1.80m to 1.50m 1.70m to 1.50m
In the third try I left the same optimized U-values To enhance the annual heat demand in the
and reduced the size of the sky lights from 1.80m fourth try I also reduced the size of the north
to 1.50m. The annual heat demand reduced a windows from 1.70m to 1.50m. It got reduced by
little bit more and the heat loss remain practically 0.3 reaching 16.9 kWh/m²a
the same.
OPTION 5
Heat Balance
Annual heat demand:
16.20 kWh/m²a
U values (W/m2K) : In a fifth try to enhance the annual heat demand I
Wall: 0.097 – 350mm increased the thickness of the insulation layer from
Roof: 0.10 300mm to 350mm. It got nearer to the 15.0 kWh/m²a
Floor: 0.10 required by Passivhaus, reaching an annual heat
Glazing: 0.6 demand of 16.20 kWh/m²a.
I didn’t tried to reduce more the window areas
Exterior wall
because I realized that by reducing them the heat
thickness: 492mm
losses by opaque surfaces increased.
Reduce north sky Reduce north After I got my best annual heat demand level, I made
lights size: from windows size: from daylight and ventilation testing to see its
1.80m to 1.50m 1.70m to 1.50m performance.
JUNE 21 JUNE 21
12:00 PM 12:00 PM
DECEMBER 21 DECEMBER 21
12:00 PM 12:00 PM
BUOYANCY DRIVEN
2
0
Before outlet Before outlet PHPP outlet PHPP outlet
in roof in window in roof in window
1.5
Dry bulb temperature – Room air temperature Of the final design obtained with the
PHPP results now I compared in IES the
With internal heat gains Without internal heat gains dry bulb temperature with the room
Annual Annual air temperature with internal heat
gains (people and lighting) with two
different factors, with natural
ventilation and without natural
ventilation.
I saw that the room air temperature
lowered throughout the year with
natural ventilation.
Then I did another try without any
internal heat gains to see how much it
affected the room air temperature.
I realized that It actually influence
directly the temperature of the room
gaining more heat with people and
lighting factors, so different strategies
should be implemented in the
different seasons of the year.
Last week of January Second week of July
I studied the coldest and warmest
weak of the year when the children
are in school.
In the coldest weak natural ventilation
is clearly not needed, so windows will
be closed.
In the warmest weak natural
ventilation is required to cool down
the room to have a more comfortable
temperature, as required for ASHRAE
Standard 55-2013 acceptability limits.
Design Proposal:
1. Divide classroom areas by age, separate small children with their own
playground.
2. Create a patio so children can interact with each other and also the different
communities that are joining the school, creating different types of spaces
that will fuse with each other through shading PVs.
1 2
2 2 3. Use natural and sustainable materials for construction and also for
aesthetics purpose, to give a natural appearance with color sparks in
some parts to make it a vivid place.
3 4 5
Design Proposal:
4. Have a controlled access to the school for the community to use the space for
different extracurricular activities in non school hours.
5. Create outdoor workspaces in order for children to learn in a more interactive
way and to be close with the environment.
6. Create an orchard so children can learn to grow their own food and to aware
them about the environment, afterwards they can make an event to sell the
food they grew.
5
4 8
3 9
Main access.
Secondary access for reception and infant children. Separate yard for smaller children Reception classroom
June 21
12:00 PM
December 21
12:00 PM
OPTION 5
With PV and MVHR
Energy Performance
• The energy performance was improved
through various strategies: the walls, floor
and roof have a U-value of 0.15 W/m2K or
less, making it “super insulated”.
• Glazing has a low U-value being 0.7 W/m2K
• The lighting performance was calculated
by using LED lighting.
• The infiltration rate has Passivhaus required
levels being “extremely tight building” 0.6
m3/m2h.
• The use of PVs in the roof and MVHR help in
the saving of the total energy use per year
and the annual energy cost.
Design 2, vertical sky
lights in north facade
OPTION 5
Heat Balance
Thermal envelope:
• Use passivhouse principles of a
U values (W/m2K) : continuous insulation and air tightness
Wall: 0.097 – 350mm in order to work successfully and avoid
Roof: 0.10 thermal bridges. Use triple glazing in
Floor: 0.10 windows, wood fibre as insulation
Glazing: 0.6 layer, Durelis vapourblock for air
tightness, and cross laminated timber.7
Exterior wall
• The total envelope thickness is 492mm.
thickness: 492mm
Air Tightness Through the Energy Balance Equation we got that taking
into consideration the conductive heat loss, thermal
Insulation envelope U-vale and outside temperature we got an inside
temperature of 19.21°C.
A conductive heat loss of 2,160.1W
DB Temp. And the energy needed of space conditioning for the
6.1°C
classroom to reach comfort temperature (21°C) is 260.1W
Comfort strategy:
Comf. Temp. In the morning, when the children are arriving, solar radiation
19°C-22°C
can warm up the classrooms as the trees are note fully
100W bloomed and the sun altitude is low. In the morning is colder
60W x 30
1800W and the windows are closed to avoid heat loss so for
ventilation the use of MVHR is needed, the minimum
average air change rate is of 0.3 m3/s.
9:00 AM
Air Tightness
Energy Balance Equation results:
Insulation - Inside temperature of 22.71°C.
- A conductive heat loss of 1,652.69W
- The inside temperature is a little above the comfort
temperature so we need to remove 247.31W
DB Temp.
9.6°C Comfort strategy:
In the afternoon we still want to avoid overheating, the trees
Comf. Temp.
19°C-22°C
will help lower down some solar radiation. The cross
ventilation strategy will also work to maintain the comfort
100W
60W x 30 temperature inside and provide fresh air. Windows can be
1800W opened more time as precipitation in this month is lower
compared to the rest of the year. The trees will also help to
reduce wind speed.
3:00 PM
June
DB Temp.
12°C-17°C
Comfort strategy:
In the warmest months a night cooling strategy is
implemented to cool down the classrooms to have a
comfort temperature in the next morning, and save some
energy use, as long as precipitation isn’t forecasted.
10:00 PM – 6:00 AM
Air Tightness
Air Tightness
PRESENTATIONS:
- FORD, B. (2018) ‘Ventilation & Convective Cooling’ [PowerPoint
Presentation]. ABEE4014: Advanced sustainable design.
Available at:
https://moodle.nottingham.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=94069
[Accessed on November 2019]