Assignment 01
Assignment 01
By
Mahmood Ul Hasnain
04-6-1-010-2022
Feb-2023
Abstract
In this assignment, we conduct Finite Element Analysis (FEA) on a 2D triangular plate to obtain
several results, including the equivalent Von-Mises stress and total deformation. Additionally, we
calculate the safety factor against yielding. Various options and settings are explored to investigate
their impact on the results, particularly focusing on the size option for meshing. By comparing
different settings, we can assess their influence on the outcomes. Furthermore, we address
numerical computation errors such as rigid body motion and examine the use of weak springs to
mitigate this issue. Finally, we employ the symmetry option, which reduces computational efforts
by analyzing only half of the geometry due to its symmetrical nature.
Geometry
• Explain the use of symmetry in ANSYS Mechanical analysis? Describe the limitations
and advantages? Compare the results of Weak spring and Symmetry method for
triangular plate and describe the difference.
The use of symmetry in ANSYS Mechanical allows for efficient analysis of structures with
symmetrical geometry. By exploiting the symmetry of the model, only a portion of the
structure needs to be analyzed, reducing computational resources and time. The analysis is
performed on a smaller region, such as a half or a quarter of the geometry, while applying
appropriate symmetry boundary conditions. Results obtained from the reduced analysis can
be mirrored or multiplied to represent the complete structure accurately. This technique is
particularly useful in cases where geometry exhibits symmetry, enabling faster simulations
and more efficient resource utilization.
Advantages
• Reduced computational effort: By utilizing symmetry, the analysis is performed on a
smaller portion of the geometry, leading to significant time and resource savings.
• Faster simulations: With fewer elements to solve, the analysis can be completed more
quickly, allowing for faster design iterations and optimization.
• Efficient resource utilization: Symmetry analysis enables efficient utilization of
computational resources, as the simulation focuses on the essential region of interest.
• Simplified post-processing: Symmetry allows for straightforward post-processing, as
results obtained from the analyzed portion can be mirrored or multiplied to represent the
entire structure accurately.
Limitations
• Non-symmetrical effects are neglected: Symmetry assumptions overlook non-symmetrical
phenomena and may result in inaccurate predictions if significant non-symmetrical
behavior exists.
• Limited applicability: Symmetry analysis is suitable only for structures that possess
symmetrical geometry. Complex or asymmetric geometries cannot benefit from this
technique.
• Symmetry boundary conditions must be properly defined: Careful consideration is required
when applying appropriate symmetry boundary conditions to ensure accurate
representation of the complete structure.
• Reduction in detail: Symmetry analysis disregards fine details and variations in behavior
that may exist in non-symmetrical regions, which can be crucial in some engineering
problems.
The element size command allows us to define the element size according to our needs. When we
decrease the element size, it leads to a higher density of elements and nodes in the mesh. As a
result, ANSYS is required to perform a larger number of calculations due to the increased intricacy
of the model.
Results
Here are the results of analysis.
Total Deformation
Equivalent stress
Conclusion
This assignment focuses on performing FEA analysis of a triangular plate and presenting the
results in terms of equivalent stress, strain, and deformation. The discussion revolves around
exploring different functions of ANSYS meshing, including their applications and benefits.
Additionally, the utilization of weak springs and the implementation of symmetry conditions are
examined and verified for their effectiveness in the analysis.