Robotic Arm
Robotic Arm
BY
UDOKANG GABRIEL BASSEY
18/EG/ME/1253
ON
ROBOTIC ARM FOR HEAT TREATMENT
FURNACE
TO BE SUBMITTED TO
COURSE LECTURER
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING (MEE 515)
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND
AEROSPACE ENGINEERING,
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING,
UNIVERSITY OF UYO.
JANUARY, 2024
1
TABLE OF CONTENT
Cover page
Table of Content…………………………………………………………….1
List of figures………………………………………………………………..2
Abstract…………………………………………………………………….
Chapter 1
Introduction………………………………………………………………..
Chapter 2
Literature Review……………………………………………………………
Historical Review of heat treatment automation………………..…………
Robotic application in industrial heat treatment……………………………
Advantages and Challenges of Robotic systems in furnace operation
Existing Robotic arms design for Heat Treatment…………………………
Chapter 3
Design and Description of Components Part………………………………
Material Selection…………………………………………………………
Synthesis……………………………………………………………
Degree of Freedom in the design of Robotic arm for heat treatment
Chapter 4
Results and Testing……………………………………………………………
Conclusions……………………………………………………………………
References…………………………………………………………………….
2
ABSTRACT
This report explores the design and implementation of a robotic arm for
loading and unloading components in a heat treatment furnace. Motivated by
the need for efficiency and precision in industrial processes, the robotic arm
aims to enhance operational reliability and safety. The abstract outlines the
project's goals, literature review on furnace automation, material selection,
and key aspects of the robotic arm's design. The report concludes with
findings, achievements, and considerations for future enhancements, making
it a valuable resource for those interested in advancing automation in heat
treatment processes.
3
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
4
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
5
Robotics began to play a crucial role in material handling and positioning
within furnaces.
Advantages
1. Precision and Consistency
6
2. Increased Efficiency
3. Reduced Labor Intensity
4. Enhanced Safety
5. Flexibility and Adaptability
Challenges
1. Thermal Stress on Robotic Components
2. Integration Complexity
3. Cost of Implementation
4. Maintenance Requirements
5. Skill Requirements
In the realm of heat treatment, existing robotic arm designs showcase a range
of configurations tailored to meet the demands of precision, durability, and
efficiency within high-temperature environments. Notable designs include:
7
demanding stability and precise control, such as handling delicate
components.
6. Customized End Effectors: Many robotic arm designs for heat treatment
incorporate specialized end effectors. These could include grippers with
heat-resistant materials or mechanisms designed for specific component
shapes, ensuring precise and secure handling within the furnace.
8
CHAPTER 3
9
Fig 3.1 Robotic Arm ( Front,Top and Side View)
1. Base: The base of the robotic arm serves as its foundational support and
attachment to the working environment. It provides stability and anchoring
for the entire system, ensuring a secure platform for precise movements. The
base often incorporates mounting mechanisms for easy integration into
different setups.
10
Fig 3.2 - Base of the Robotic arm
2. Upper Arm: The upper arm is a pivotal section connecting the base to the
rest of the robotic arm. It houses crucial components like actuators and
motors responsible for lifting and lowering the arm. This section plays a
significant role in determining the arm's reach and lifting capacity.
11
robotic arm to navigate a broader working space. The design of the shoulder
is crucial for achieving both flexibility and stability during operation.
12
5. Elbow: The elbow joint facilitates the bending and extending motions of
the forearm. It is a key articulation point that determines the arm's ability to
reach and maneuver in confined spaces. The design of the elbow is critical
for achieving precision in various operational tasks.
13
7. Wrist Pitch: The wrist pitch joint allows the end effector to tilt,
introducing an additional degree of freedom. This tilting capability is
essential for adapting to the orientation of components within the working
environment. The wrist pitch enhances the arm's ability to handle objects
with varied orientations.
14
MATERIAL SELECTION
Table 1.0
System Integration
15
● End Effector Integration: Ensures seamless interaction with
components in the heat treatment furnace.
SYNTHESIS
3. Control Systems: Control systems regulate the behavior of the robotic arm
by manipulating its inputs to achieve desired outputs. In heat treatment
processes, control systems ensure precise positioning, movement, and
coordination of the arm's components. This involves feedback mechanisms
from sensors to adjust the arm's actions in real-time, adapting to varying
conditions within the furnace.
16
- Kinematic Model: The kinematic model defines the relationships
between joint angles and end effector position, determining the arm's
reachable workspace.
- Dynamic Model: Dynamics calculations consider the impact of external
forces on the arm's motion, ensuring stability and minimizing undesired
effects.
- Control Algorithms: These algorithms translate desired end effector
positions into joint movements, taking into account the dynamic forces and
constraints identified in the previous steps.
Challenges in Synthesis
- High Temperatures: Synthesizing a robotic arm for heat treatment
involves overcoming challenges related to the extreme temperatures within
the furnace. Materials must withstand thermal stress, and electronic
components should operate reliably in such conditions.
- Precision Requirements:Achieving the required precision in positioning
and movement, especially in tasks like grasping components, demands
careful consideration of kinematic and dynamic factors.
17
DEGREE OF FREEDOM IN THE DESIGN OF ROBOTIC ARM FOR
HEAT TREATMENT
1. Joint Movements: The joints in a robotic arm provide the primary sources
of freedom. Understanding and optimizing joint movements determine the
arm's ability to reach various positions within the furnace.
- Consideration:Balancing the number and type of joints allows for a
fine-tuned design that meets the specific requirements of loading and
unloading components in heat treatment.
18
- Consideration: Optimizing the degree of freedom ensures that the robotic
arm can navigate within confined spaces, reach components at varying
heights, and adapt to the dynamic conditions of the heat treatment process.
OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGES
19
CHAPTER 4
20
21
22
23
Fig 3.9 3D HD SEQUENCE
24
Fig 4.0 3D HD RENDERS
25
CONCLUSION
In wrapping up, the robotic arm designed for heat treatment brings efficiency
and precision to loading and unloading tasks. From historical evolution to
existing designs, it's clear that automation is reshaping industrial processes.
26
REFERENCES
27