0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views6 pages

Accounting Data Analysis and Findings

1) A study was conducted with 20 respondents, of which 60% were male and 40% were female. 2) The results showed the highest mean was 7.9 for mechanical accounting systems, and the lowest mean was 2.4 for both accounting systems and electronic accounting systems. 3) Correlation analyses were run between the dependent variable of accounting systems and three independent variables. The correlations with manual accounting systems and electronic accounting systems were close to 0, while the correlation with mechanical accounting systems was -2.3.

Uploaded by

Ayesha Kanwal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views6 pages

Accounting Data Analysis and Findings

1) A study was conducted with 20 respondents, of which 60% were male and 40% were female. 2) The results showed the highest mean was 7.9 for mechanical accounting systems, and the lowest mean was 2.4 for both accounting systems and electronic accounting systems. 3) Correlation analyses were run between the dependent variable of accounting systems and three independent variables. The correlations with manual accounting systems and electronic accounting systems were close to 0, while the correlation with mechanical accounting systems was -2.3.

Uploaded by

Ayesha Kanwal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Data Analysis and Findings

This chapter provides bird eye view about the result of a study. The detailed description of
results is as follows.

1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents


Gender Frequency Percentage
Male 12 60 %
Female 8 40%
Total 20 100%
Table 1.1 Gender Profile

The above table provides the gender profile of the respondents. It is evident from the data that
out of 20 respondents 60% are male and 40% are female.

2. Measure of Central Tendency and Dispersion


Mean Grand Standard
Question Responses Mean Deviation
Variables numbers

Accounting 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1.4
System 2 1 2 2 2 3 1 5 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 1.8 2.4 1.58
3 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 5 5 5 4 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 4 4.1
Manual 4 1 3 4 1 5 1 3 4 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 2 3 2.1
Accounting 5 2 3 2 3 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 3 1 3 2 1 3 2.1 2.5 0.78

System 6 2 3 5 5 2 3 3 4 3 3 4 5 5 4 4 2 3 4 2 5 3.5

Mechanical 7 2 3 1 5 2 3 1 5 5 1 3 2 2 3 1 5 3 3 1 2 2.6
Accounting 8 2 3 5 5 3 2 5 2 3 2 3 1 2 2 3 1 5 2 3 5 2.7 7.9 0.9

System 9 2 3 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 3 4 4 3 2.6

Electronic 10 3 3 4 5 5 3 4 5 4 3 3 4 5 3 4 3 5 3 4 4 3.8
Accounting 11 1 3 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 2 3 2 1 1.8 2.4 0.8

System 12 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 2 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 3 1 1.7

Table 2.1 Details of dependent variable and independent variables


Formula: MEAN = ∑x ÷ n

x = value of answers

n = number of respondents

Formula of standard deviation

S.No Variables Mean Standard Deviation


1 Accounting system 2.4 1.58
2 Manual 2.5 0.78
Accounting System
3 Mechanical 7.9 0.9
Accounting System
4 Electronic 2.4 0.8
Accounting system
Table 2.2 Mean and Standard Deviation of variables

The above tables are providing detail about the measure of central tendency and dispersion. The
result shows that the highest mean is 7.9 of independent variable which is mechanical
accounting system with standard deviation 0.9. Whereas, the lowest mean is 2.4 of both
independent variable and dependent variable which is accounting system and electronic
accounting system with standard deviation of 1.58 and 0.8 respectively.
3. The Correlation Analysis

Table 3.1 the correlation between dependent variable and independent variable 1

Manual Accounting
Accounting System (y) xy x2 y2
System (x)
2 1 2 4 1
3 2 6 9 4
2 2 4 4 4
3 2 6 9 4
2 2 4 4 4
1 1 1 1 1
1 2 2 1 4
2 1 2 4 1
3 1 3 9 1
2 1 2 4 1
2 2 4 4 4
2 1 2 4 1
1 1 1 1 1
3 2 6 9 4
3 2 6 9 4
1 1 1 1 1
3 1 3 9 1
2 1 2 4 1
1 1 1 1 1
3 1 3 9 1
∑x = 42 ∑y = 28 ∑xy = 61 ∑x2 = 100 ∑y2 = 44

42 X 28
61−
20
r=
(√ 100− 100
20 )
44
.(44− )
20

= 0.03

Table 3.2 the correlation between dependent variable and independent variable 2

Mechanical Accounting
Accounting System (y) xy x2 y2
System (x)
2 1 2 4 1
3 2 6 6 4
4 2 8 16 4
4 2 8 16 4
2 2 4 4 4
2 1 2 4 1
3 2 6 9 4
3 1 3 9 1
4 1 4 16 1
2 1 2 4 1
2 2 4 4 4
4 1 4 16 1
2 1 2 4 1
3 2 6 9 4
2 2 4 4 4
2 1 2 4 1
3 1 3 9 1
4 1 4 16 1
4 1 4 16 1
3 1 3 9 1
∑x = 58 ∑y = 28 ∑xy = 81 ∑x2 = 179 ∑y2 = 44

58 X 28
81−
20
r=
(√ 179− 179
20 ) 44
.(44− )
20

= - 2.3

Table 3.3 the correlation between dependent variable and independent variable 3

Electronic Accounting
Accounting System (y) xy x2 y2
System (x)
1 1 1 1 1
3 2 6 6 4
1 2 2 1 4
1 2 2 1 4
1 2 2 1 4
1 1 1 1 1
2 2 4 4 4
3 1 3 6 1
3 1 3 6 1
2 1 2 4 1
1 2 2 1 4
2 1 2 4 1
1 1 1 1 1
2 2 4 4 4
3 2 6 6 4
1 1 1 1 1
2 1 2 4 1
1 1 1 1 1
2 1 2 4 1
1 1 1 1 1
∑x = 34 ∑y = 28 ∑xy = 47 ∑x2 = 58 ∑y2 = 44
34 X 28
47−
20
r=
(√ 58− 5820 ).(44− 4420 )
= - 0.01

The Pearson's correlation matrix is obtained for continuous independent and dependent variables.
The results are shown in the tables above. From the results we can observe that manual
accounting system has positive relationship with dependent variable whereas, mechanical
accounting system and electronics accounting system have significant negative relationship with
dependent variable.

You might also like