Samini Varghese RVIM
Samini Varghese RVIM
Samini Varghese RVIM
net/publication/322006021
CITATIONS READS
0 4,241
1 author:
Samini Varghese
Christ University, Bangalore
4 PUBLICATIONS 3 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Samini Varghese on 22 September 2019.
Samini Varghese1
Research Scholar,
Christ University,
Bangalore;
India
[email protected]
and
MV
a Work Engagement b
IV: DV:
Burnout Turnover
Intention
c
Figure 1:
IV-Independent variable, Dv-Dependent variable MV,
Hypothesis
- To determine the level of work engagement and turnover intention among educators in
higher educational institutions
- To investigate the relationship between burnout , work engagement and turnover
intention
- Work Engagement mediates the relationship between burnout and turnover intention
among educators in higher educational institutions.
Research Methodology:
Research design
A non-probability purposive and random method of sampling so as to give all individuals
within the population equal chance to be chosen. Professional educators of higher Educational
institutions in Bangalore constitute the population for the study. The present study is undertaken
to determine the relationship between work engagement, burnout and turnover intention among
educators in higher educational institutions using work engagement as a mediator. A total of 200
questionnaires were distributed among potential respondents chosen from educators from Degree
Colleges, Engineering Colleges and Business Schools among the various higher educational
institutions. In all, 192 questionnaires were returned, 14 of them were incomplete and therefore
rejected, leaving total of 178 usable questionnaires full filled giving a response rate of 89%
percentage. All the respondents were of the age between 24 to 60 years. The current study uses
Likert scales to measure the responses, since this scale is widely used in marketing and social
science research (Garland, 1991).
Measuring instruments
In this study, the survey covers theories relating to the constructs work engagement,
burnout and turnover intention. Work engagement is measured by using a 17 item scale of Work
and Well-Being Survey (UWES) by Schaufeli and Bakker (2003). Burnout: Maslach Burnout
Inventory – Educators Survey (MBI-ES) (1998)- 22 item scale. Turnover intention is measured
by the tool developed developed a 14 item scale by Roodt 2004.
As shown, the majority of the respondents were spread across two age group ie., between
the age group of 20 – 30 were 47.8% and between the age group 31- 40 were 41 %, Most of the
respondent 55.8% were female. Most of the respondents 89.7% were post graduates and 68.9%
of them were married. Among all the respondents a majority of 47.8% has an experience less
than 5 years, most of them 46.8% fall under the income group between 25001 – 50000 and
77.9% taught under graduates.
Results and discussion:
1. Level of work engagement and turnover intention among educators in higher educational
institution.
To answer H1, mean scores, standard deviations (SD), skewness, kurtosis and internal
consistency reliability coefficients are compared for work engagement, burnout and turnover
intention. Table-I that the internal reliability of the factors as measured by Cronbach’s Alpha ,
are all above 0.70, which confirms internal consistency of the items in a variable. As shown in
Table II, the respondents were moderately engaged with their jobs showed mean score of Vigor
at (mean = 3.54, SD = 0.97), Dedication showed a mean score of (mean = 3.74, SD = 0.93),and
Absorption showed a mean score of of (mean = 3.42, SD = 0.91), burnout showed a mean score
of (mean = 3.72, SD = 0.79) and turnover intention showed a mean score of (mean = 3.29, SD =
0.99). The skewness and Kurtosis values value for all the constructs range between 0.67 and -
0.51, there by falling within the -1 and +1 normality range recommended for these coefficients
(Howell, 2008)
Table-II provides descriptive statistics for each variable. The present study used a 7-point
Likert scale from 1-5 where 1 = strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neither disagree nor agree, 4 =
agree, and 5 = strongly agree to measure all the theoretical constructs.
TABLE-II
Variable Mean SD Skewness Kurtosis Cronbach’s Alpha
Work Engagement
Vigor 3.54 0.97 -0.25 -0.39 0.71
Dedication 3.74 0.93 0.20 -0.82 0.82
Absorption 3.42 0.91 0.22 -0.67 0.81
Burnout 3.72 0.70 0.16 - 0.34 0.79
Turnover Intention 3.29 0.99 -0.51 -0.54 0.88
Higher score indicates higher work engagement, burnout and turnover intention
2. Relationship between Work Engagement burnout and turnover intention among educators in
higher educational institution.
The strength of the relationship between the predictor and the outcome that is can controlled
and decreased with the help of a mediator. Figure 1 above shows the model where the mediation
can be seen in relation with the independent and dependent variables. Path “a” shows the
relationship between the independent variable that is burnout and the mediator that is work
engagement. Path “b” shows the relationship between the mediator that is work engagement and
dependent variable and path “c” shows the relationship between the independent variable that is
burnout and the dependent variable that is turnover intention.
Pearson correlation is computed to address H2 and H3. Table-III shows the results from
the analyses conducted.
TABLE-III.
Correlation among variables
Turnover Intention
Work Engagement
Vigor -0.12**
Dedication -0.35**
Absorption -0.19*
Burnout 0.51**
*p<.01 **p<.001
Saks (2006) recorded that work engagement had a positive influence with antecedents
such as job satisfaction and a negative influence with turnover intention. Schaufeli and Bakker
(2004) also emphasizes the mediating effect of work engagement (participation) on turnover
intention.
In relation to RO2 and RO3, results show that all the variables were significantly related.
Burnout out is found to be significantly and higher the burnout higher is the turnover intention.
The model shown above shows that there is a significant and positive relationship between the
independent variable that is burnout and the dependent variable that is turnover intention also
there is a significant and negative relationship between the mediating variable that is work
engagement and the dependent variable that is turnover intention. As seen there is a significant
and negative relationship between work engagement and turnover intention. Higher work
engagement leads to lower turnover intention.
Conclusion
The study explored the relationship between work engagement, burnout and turnover
intention. The findings indicate that there is a significant relationship between the respondents
work engagement, burnout and turnover intention. It is seen that respondents who are highly
engaged in their job within the organization appears to have less intention to quit the institution,
which is supported by of previous studies of Halbesleben and Wheeler (2008) and Mitchell et al.,
(2001).
The results indicates that work engagement can be a stronger negative predictor of the
respondents turnover intention. The findings of this study is also strongly supported by previous
studies of Mangi and Jalbani (2013) who suggest that work engagement is a mediator to turnover
intention. It is also agreed upon by Ahmad, Shahid, Haider (2012), employees who experience
more burnout has higher intention to quit. Overall, from the findings it can be conclude that high
level of work engagement leads to decrease in turnover intention. The findings of this study have
contributed valuable knowledge on work engagement as an ideal mediator on turnover intention
among educators in higher educational institutions in Bangalore, India.