Woodford 2005
Woodford 2005
Woodford 2005
www.elsevier.com/locate/cplett
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Eastern Oregon University, One University Blvd.,
303J Badgley Hall, La Grande, OR 97850-2899, United States
Abstract
A theoretical analysis of anthocyanidins, a class of natural plant pigments, has been conducted using density functional theory at
the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level. It is found that these compounds are non-planar, with the 2-phenyl ring twisted relative to the benzo-
pyrylium rings. TD-DFT calculations reveal a first excited state dominated by two orbital transitions, including the HOMO–LUMO
transition. From a comparison of these molecular orbitals with those of related compounds, and from the known chemistry of these
compounds, it is suggested that anthocyanidins should be regarded as natural, stable carbocations.
Ó 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0009-2614/$ - see front matter Ó 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2005.05.067
J.N. Woodford / Chemical Physics Letters 410 (2005) 182–187 183
Table 1
Selected structural data for anthocyanidins and comparison to experimental values
Propertya F Ap Apb Cy Cyc Dp Lt Mv Pg Pn Pt
d(O1–C2) 1.337 1.349 1.34 1.351 1.349 1.352 1.349 1.353 1.349 1.353 1.352
d(C2–C3) 1.409 1.404 1.39 1.424 1.396 1.424 1.404 1.424 1.423 1.424 1.410
d(C3–C4) 1.378 1.381 1.37 1.384 1.380 1.383 1.383 1.385 1.385 1.383 1.393
d(C4–C4a) 1.418 1.406 1.39 1.407 1.382 1.407 1.408 1.407 1.406 1.407 1.399
d(C4a–C5) 1.416 1.427 1.42 1.427 1.432 1.426 1.428 1.429 1.427 1.429 1.434
d(C5–C6) 1.381 1.383 1.37 1.384 1.366 1.384 1.385 1.380 1.383 1.379 1.378
d(C6–C7) 1.413 1.414 1.41 1.415 1.413 1.415 1.413 1.415 1.416 1.415 1.416
d(C7–C8) 1.389 1.403 1.40 1.399 1.387 1.399 1.402 1.399 1.399 1.400 1.399
d(C8–C8a) 1.394 1.382 1.36 1.384 1.376 1.384 1.381 1.390 1.384 1.390 1.388
d(C8a–O1) 1.367 1.370 1.37 1.362 1.361 1.362 1.368 1.360 1.361 1.362 1.359
d(C4a–C8a) 1.415 1.419 1.41 1.413 1.408 1.413 1.419 1.410 1.414 1.411 1.417
dðC2 –C10 Þ 1.448 1.440 1.45 1.437 1.453 1.436 1.439 1.436 1.438 1.435 1.446
dðC10 –C20 Þ 1.415 1.419 1.40 1.425 1.409 1.422 1.419 1.425 1.425 1.428 1.417
dðC20 –C30 Þ 1.387 1.377 1.38 1.380 1.371 1.384 1.382 1.378 1.376 1.378 1.387
dðC30 –C40 Þ 1.400 1.408 1.39 1.425 1.400 1.416 1.424 1.423 1.410 1.426 1.411
dðC40 –C50 Þ 1.400 1.409 1.39 1.400 1.378 1.411 1.401 1.410 1.406 1.397 1.404
dðC50 –C60 Þ 1.388 1.384 1.38 1.385 1.383 1.381 1.385 1.391 1.382 1.384 1.392
dðC60 –C10 Þ 1.415 1.417 1.40 1.417 1.404 1.421 1.412 1.415 1.421 1.420 1.415
sðO1 –C2 –C10 –C20 Þ 7.52 4.98 4.14 2.19 5.9 3.75 2.21 7.91 1.82 10.70 28.14
a
Bond lengths in Angstroms; torsion angles in degrees.
b
From [18].
c
From [19].
184 J.N. Woodford / Chemical Physics Letters 410 (2005) 182–187
Table 2
TD-DFT results for the first several electronic excited states of anthocyanidins
Compound DE (eV) f kcalc (nm) Composition kexpta (nm)
F 3.11 0.007 399 HOMO ! LUMO (0.102) n/a
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.675)
3.30 0.626 375 HOMO ! LUMO (0.617) n/a
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.101)
3.34 0.007 371 (HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.672) n/a
Ap 2.88 0.445 431 HOMO ! LUMO (0.536) 476
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.359)
3.21 0.328 386 HOMO ! LUMO (0.316)
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.559)
3.63 0.004 341 (HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.684)
Cy 2.53 0.470 489 HOMO ! LUMO (0.574) 535
(HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.244)
2.76 0.024 449 (HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.660)
(HOMO 3) ! LUMO (0.104)
3.17 0.299 391 HOMO ! LUMO (0.177)
(HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.628)
Dp 2.53 0.181 490 HOMO ! LUMO (0.318) 546
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.555)
2.55 0.446 486 HOMO ! LUMO (0.454)
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.389)
2.89 0.098 428 (HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.608)
(HOMO 3) ! LUMO (0.122)
Lt 2.65 0.424 468 HOMO ! LUMO (0.596) 493
(HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.220)
2.99 0.049 415 (HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.665)
(HOMO 3) ! LUMO (0.102)
3.29 0.296 377 HOMO ! LUMO (0.638)
(HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.162)
Mv 2.42 0.111 513 HOMO ! LUMO (0.356) 542
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.557)
2.60 0.533 477 HOMO ! LUMO (0.459)
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.384)
2.94 0.045 422 (HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.631)
Pg 2.64 0.417 470 HOMO ! LUMO (0.556) 520
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.295)
3.13 0.367 397 HOMO ! LUMO (0.243)
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.583)
3.46 0.012 359 (HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.681)
Pn 2.60 0.560 476 HOMO ! LUMO (0.574) 532
(HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.208)
2.88 0.001 430 (HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.654)
(HOMO 3) ! LUMO (0.127)
3.15 0.210 393 HOMO ! LUMO (0.160)
(HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.642)
Pt 2.47 0.394 502 HOMO ! LUMO (0.572) 543
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.255)
2.61 0.142 475 HOMO ! LUMO (0.213)
(HOMO 1) ! LUMO (0.632)
2.91 0.003 426 (HOMO 2) ! LUMO (0.642)
(HOMO 3) ! LUMO (0.157)
a
In methanol/HCl solution; from [31].
gas-phase values to values obtained experimentally in first three electronic excitations predicted by the TD-
solution. While it is believed that the transition to the DFT method, except for flavylium, only two have
first excited state is responsible for the vivid coloration non-negligible oscillator strengths (f > 0.1). Further-
of anthocyanidins, the present results suggest that high- more, both of these are qualitatively similar for all com-
er excited states may also play a prominent role. Of the pounds studied, involving a pair of orbital transitions:
186 J.N. Woodford / Chemical Physics Letters 410 (2005) 182–187
O O
Fig. 5. Resonance pair of Lewis structures for flavylium that more accurately correspond to the calculated results.
relatively small, from 4.4 kcal/mol [11] to 8.96 kcal/mol [3] See, e.g., M.C. Moncada, A.J. Parola, C. Loderio, F. Pina, M.
[12] in flavylium. This implies, then, that rotation be- Maestri, V. Balzani, Chem. Eur. J. 10 (2004) 1519, and references
cited therein.
tween the B-ring and C-ring is free. From the structural [4] R. Brouillard, J.-E. Dubois, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99 (1977)
data, we conclude that the resonance structure with the 1359.
positive charge located at C2 is dominant over the one [5] R. Brouillard, B. Delaporte, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99 (1977)
with the positive charge located at C4, since the C3–C4 8461.
bond is shorter than the C2–C3 bond. While similar con- [6] R. Brouillard, B. Delaporte, J.-E. Dubois, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100
(1978) 6202.
clusions have been drawn from semiempirical and HF [7] W.E. Kurtin, P.-S. Song, Tetrahedron 24 (1968) 2255.
studies [9,11], this is the first time these conclusions have [8] P.-S. Song, T.A. Moore, M. Sun, Adv. Food Res. 3 (1972) 33.
been validated using density functional methods which [9] G.K. Pereira, P.M. Donate, S.E. Galembeck, J. Mol. Struct. 392
include electron correlation. (1997) 169.
[10] G.K. Pereira, S.E. Galembeck, Spectrochim. Acta A 54 (1998)
339.
[11] G.K. Pereira, P.M. Donate, S.E. Galembeck, J. Mol. Struct. 363
4. Conclusion (1996) 87.
[12] M. Meyer, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 76 (2000) 724.
DFT calculations on commonly occurring anthocy- [13] M.W. Schmidt, K.K. Baldridge, J.A. Boatz, S.T. Elbert, M.S.
anidins have predicted structural properties in reasonable Gordon, J.H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K.A. Nguyen, S.
Su, T.L. Windus, M. Dupuis, J.A. Montgomery, J. Comput.
agreement with experiment; the TD-DFT method applied Chem. 14 (1993) 1347.
to the DFT equilibrium geometry resulted in a first ex- [14] M.J. Frisch et al., GAUSSIAN 03, Revision B.02, Gaussian Inc.,
cited state dominated by two orbital transitions: the Wallingford, CT, 2004.
HOMO to LUMO transition, and a HOMO 1/ [15] A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 5648.
HOMO 2 to LUMO transition. On the basis of these [16] C. Lee, G. Yang, R.G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 785.
[17] G. Schaftenaar, J.H. Noordik, J Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 14
calculations, a pair of canonical Lewis structures for the (2000) 123.
ground state of anthocyanidins is suggested in Fig. 5, to [18] P.B. Buseta, J.C. Colleter, M. Gadret, Acta Cryst. B 30 (1974)
replace the one commonly in use (cf. Fig. 1). This pair 1448.
consists of a positive charge located either on C2 or on [19] K. Ueno, N. Saito, Acta Cryst. B 33 (1977) 114.
C4, instead of O1, with the C2-positive resonance structure [23] R.A. McClelland, S. Gedge, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102 (1980)
5838.
being the dominant member of the pair. These Lewis [24] J. Bakker, P. Bridle, T. Honda, H. Kuwano, N. Saito, N.
structures are consistent with much of the chemistry of Terahara, C.F. Timberlake, Phytochemistry 44 (1997) 1375.
anthocyanidins, and would be one of only a small handful [25] H. Fulcrand, C. Benabdeljalil, J. Rigaud, V. Cheynier, M.
of examples of a stable carbocation existing in nature. Moutonet, Phytochemistry 47 (1998) 1401.
[26] H. Fulcrand, P.-J.C. dos Santos, P. Sarni-Manchado, V.
Cheynier, J. Favre-Bonvin, J Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 (735)
(1996).
Acknowledgement [27] Y. Lu, Y. Foo, Y. Sun, Tetrahedron Lett. 43 (2002) 7341.
[28] M. Schwarz, T.C. Wabintz, P. Winterhalter, J. Agric. Food
The author gratefully acknowledges the financial sup- Chem. 51 (2003) 3682.
port of the EOU Faculty Scholars fund. [29] C. Roehri-Stoeckel, E. Gonzalez, A. Fougerousse, R. Brouillard,
Can. J. Chem. 79 (2001) 1173.
[30] J.B. Harbone, Biochem. J. 70 (1958) 22.
[31] R. Bauernschmitt, R. Ahlrichs, Chem. Phys. Lett. 256 (1996)
References 454.
[32] J. Cioslowski, P. Piskorz, G. Liu, D. Moncrieff, J. Phys. Chem.
[1] A.D. Sarma, R. Sharma, Phytochemistry 52 (1999) 1313. 100 (1996) 19333.
[2] S. Meiers, M. Kemény, U. Weyand, R. Gastpar, E. von Angerer, [33] A. Almenningen, O. Bastiansen, L. Fernholt, B.N. Cyvin, S.J.
D. Marko, J. Agric. Food Chem. 49 (2001) 958. Cyvin, S. Samdal, J. Mol. Struct. 128 (1985) 59.