Investigations On Fouling Rate in Convective Bundles
Investigations On Fouling Rate in Convective Bundles
Investigations On Fouling Rate in Convective Bundles
www.fuelfirst.com
Abstract
The article deals with results of full-scale investigations on fouling in convective bundles of chosen types of coal-fired boilers. The boilers
tested were: conventional pulverized-coal fired two-pass boilers (two types), a single-pass subcritical (a tower shape) boiler and CFB boiler.
Mechanisms of deposit formation and basics of deposit modeling are shortly discussed. An own approach to predict build-up of loose
powdery sediments was developed on the basis of the results of full-scale measurements. The correlation for maximum fouling time was
obtained by statistical processing of measurement data and is applied in optimization of sootblower system operation. The obtained
correlation depends on the following variables: geometric properties of the bundle, fly ash size distribution and basic parameters of the flue
gases—all of them are easily accessible in boiler operation.
q 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
In some cases, sediments on heat transfer surfaces of sulphates and only slight amount of SiO2 and Al2O3. The
achieve so significant sizes that the outage in boiler composition of the deposits changes with time and they
operation is needed in order to perform manual cleaning become stronger and harder.
of heat exchangers and flue gas ducts. All these processes Within the range of flue gas temperatures from about
lead to undesirable increase of operating costs of boilers. 800 8C down to the dew-point, the tubes are covered with
Implementation of sootblowers lower the scale of fouling loose powdery deposits containing more than 50% SiO2 and
phenomena and associated operational costs but on the other over 20% Al2O3. The composition of these sediments is not
hand, implementation of such system in existing boiler essentially different from that of fly ash. The effect of the
requires capital costs and additional costs linked to temperature of the tube walls on the structure and features of
increased fatigue of the bundle as a result of erosion and the deposits may be ignored. Deposits on adjacent super-
stresses. With increasing popularity of sootblowing systems heater and evaporator tubes, for which the wall temperature
in p-f boilers and their obligatory application in CFB boilers difference reaches 200 8C, are similar.
it is obvious that optimization of cleaning is of great interest. Recently, in the work [4], there is a new concept for
The results presented in the article belong to the series of deposits classification based on their chemical composition
the R&D investigations carried out in the Institute of Power and morphology. Typical shapes of deposits noticed on
Engineering and Turbomachinery and targeted on fouling, boiler heating surfaces are presented in Fig. 1. The
slagging and optimization of sootblowing programs [2,3]. convective bundles are, as a rule, covered with powdered
sediments of shape B, C and D.
Fig. 1. Typical shapes of sediments: (A) solidified, high-temperature sediments; (B) powdered, two-sided tangential sediments; (C) one-sided tangential; (D)
fly ash bridge.
S. Kalisz, M. Pronobis / Fuel 84 (2005) 927–937 929
4. Investigation results
Table 2
Velocity and temperature of the flue gases in by-pass convection duct of the
OP-380 p-f boiler
that the critical flow velocity for spherical copper particles fouling rate on already cleaned tubes, at the rate of 0.5 mm
required to roll a copper particle of 10 mm is 10.5 m/s while per 5 min, were noticed in CFB boiler. This proves that CFB
for 50 mm particle is only 4.5/s. Existence of limiting flow boilers have high fouling rate. During investigations, one-
speed above which fouling is avoided is related to the sided tangential sediments were observed with only a few
critical flow velocity required to roll a particle resting on a zones of fly ash bridges. The height of sediments stayed
surface Its absolute value is determined by velocity that even on both sides of the convection duct.
corresponds to the particle size most likely to stick on the
heat exchanger tube.
4.5. Chemical composition of coal, fly ash and fly ash
particle size distribution
4.4. Investigations of circulating fluidized bed
boiler OFz-230 Samples of fly ash and coal were collected during all
trials for further analysis. Fly ash samples originated from
Fly ashes of circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boilers differ two sources—from electrical precipitator hoppers or
from conventional p-f boilers. Different chemical compo- directly from convection duct hoppers. The composition
sition and other particle-size distribution influence their of coal burned in the experimental period is shown in Table
ability to build sediments. The investigations were con- 3. It can be seen that characteristic properties of the coals
ducted simultaneously at both sides of convection pass of sampled from boilers being investigated do not show any
OFz-230 CFB boiler on the heating surface of the first stage distinct differences. Relatively, the worst coal is burned in
of steam superheater (SSH) at the level of 35.3 m. Tube the case of CFB boiler.
bank arrangement was in-line. Boiler is equipped with a The analyses of fly ash samples are shown in Table 4. For
system of sootblowers and in all cases the measurements characterization purposes the X-ray fluorescence (XRF)
were started after full cleaning cycle. During investigation, method was used, that provides bulk deposit composition as
no cleaning action was performed. elemental oxides. The fly ash of OP-380 boiler is enriched in
Measurements were performed twice. Firstly, the efforts calcium due to presence of New Integrated Desulphuriza-
were put on initial stage of fouling and sampling was tion (NID) which is semi-dry DeSOx installation in bag filter
maintained at 1/2 h frequency. Much higher fouling rate in units.
comparison to ordinary p-f boiler was observed during that The fly ash with the particles diameter lesser than 30 mm
stage. Sediments height of 2–3 mm was achieved right after mostly influence the intensity of fouling rate of powdered
1 h of experiment. sediments and therefore fly ash samples were also analyzed
Second trial was planned to estimate the total time of by means of screening procedure. Obtained results are
fouling when equilibrium is reached and there is no progress presented in Fig. 10 as remaining Rx on the sieve with mesh
in fouling height. Such equilibrium state of sediments was diameter x in the form of function RxZf(x)—in so-called
observed after approximately 16 h (see Fig. 9). Very rapid Rosin–Rammler coordinates.
Fig. 10 shows that the finest fly ash particles were
characteristic for both BP-1150 and OP-380 p-f boilers and
consequently the polydispersion numbers (defined as a slope
factor of lines) which describe the variety of available
particle diameters were similar. It is also noticeable that
wide range of particle diameters—ranging from as small
particles as 25 mm and as big as 200 mm—could be observed
for each p-f boiler.
Table 3
Analysis data of bituminous coals
8.14
2.89
0.76
2.15
8.25
0.15
21.28
10.55
44.3
0.8
EP
–
–
–
conv. pass
sample#2
OFz-230
7.21
3.35
0.56
1.80
0.66
0.13
0.20
41.06
18.02
13.24
10.78
–
conv. pass
sample#1
OFz-230
43.76
18.95
10.52
7.07
3.53
0.73
2.14
8.83
0.75
0.12
0.14
0.20
–
sample#3
OP-380
3.83
2.12
0.61
0.31
37.76
19.44
21.42
11.13
NIDa
2.3
0.5
–
–
–
sample#2
OP-380
19.95
11.82
4.58
2.16
0.65
2.11
0.64
0.27
NIDa
38.4
18.8
–
–
–
sample#1
OP-380
5.93
2.34
1.03
2.34
6.72
0.31
44.83
24.16
10.64
NIDa
0.9
–
–
–
Fig. 10. Rosin–Rammler distribution of fly ash particles (mean values for
New Integrated Desulphurization—semi-dry desulphurization method applied in bag filter (fly ash is calcified).
sample#4
7.05
1.96
2.14
0.41
3.18
0.53
1.20
0.37
0.11
0.10
51.97
29.04
sample#3
OP-650
0.10
50.39
28.04
CFB fly ash and is responsible for its weak erosion propensity.
8.17
3.40
2.58
0.61
2.73
0.81
1.11
0.37
0.12
0.11
0.10
51.19
24.96
EP
sample#1
5. Modeling of fouling
OP-650
50.73
28.40
6.30
2.17
2.23
0.44
3.01
0.61
1.22
0.42
0.20
0.11
EP
8.47
4.31
3.26
1.03
2.90
1.12
0.62
47.99
28.36
1.0
– mineralogy, chemical composition and grain-size distri-
EP
bution of coal,
–
–
–
– boiler design and its working parameters,
sample#2
8.21
4.66
3.33
1.02
3.02
1.03
1.13
0.55
47.39
28.70
ash,
Ash analysis (wt%)
EP
– fouling rate,
–
–
–
– sediments remove ability.
sample#1
BP-1150
The fouling build-up process is controlled by two inverse
7.70
3.97
3.17
0.88
3.09
0.99
1.09
0.51
47.59
28.23
EP
phenomena:
–
–
(a) particle deposition (flux M _ dep ) caused primarily by
Table 4
Mn3O4
inertial forces, thermo/electrophoresis and vapor depo-
Al2O3
Fe2O3
Na2O
MgO
P2O5
TiO2
SiO2
CaO
BaO
K2O
SO3
SrO
sition and
a
S. Kalisz, M. Pronobis / Fuel 84 (2005) 927–937 935
(b) particle detaching (flux M _ det ) caused by tangential (in hours) is proposed in present work. Statistics has been
stresses induced by gas phase flow and erosion stresses. utilized to estimate the parameters of equation in
the following form
Thus, the flux of particles depositing on exposed area A
can be described by the following equation tmax Z f ðx1 ; x2 ; .; xn Þ (5)
1 dm M _ dep M
_ where xi are the process parameters measured during full-
Z K det (2) scale investigations described in Section 4. Correlation in
A dt A A
the form of Eq. (5) is proposed for optimization of
Development of deposition within time can be described sootblower system operation.
by various relationships [10]. Often probabilistic approach Based on authors own experience and collected data it
is utilized in order to estimate collision efficiency and was assumed that the properties and dimensions of deposits,
sticking probability [11–13]. However, the most justified and consequently the maximum fouling time, are only
approach for particulate fouling resulting in loose powdery functions of:
deposits in boilers seems to be the asymptotic function to
correlate fouling data that show falling rate asymptotic 1. relative tube spacing s1Zs1/D and s2Zs2/D,
behavior [14,15]. In classic work [16], for constant, i.e. not 2. relative tube diameter D/Db,
retarded rate of fouling, detaching was assumed as 3. relative mean velocity of the flue gas in the tube bundle
w/wb,
_ det Z bm
M (3) 4. relative ash particle-size distribution R 0.03/R0.03b,
where b is the detach frequency, sK1 (R0.03—percentage of particles bigger than 30 mm, %),
Inserting Eq. (3) into Eq. (2) and integrating within (0, 0) 5. relative mean temperature of the flue gas in the tube
and (t, m) one gets so-called Kern–Seaton equation bundle T/Tb,
6. chemical constitution of the fly ash represented as B/A
m Z Mð1 K eKbt Þ (4) (base-to-acid ratio) cm.
which describes the mass of the sediments (or characteristic With this assumption in mind and through statistical
dimension—for example height; also thermal effectiveness processing of the measurement results, the following
number J) reached after time interval t by asymptotic correlation for maximum fouling time—restricted to only
deposition. It is also assumed that the stream of depositing a few independent variables—was developed:
particles (flux M _ dep ) is constant within depositing time. In
0:744 0:319 0:249
Eq. (4), parameter M indices maximal mass of the sediments w R0:03 T
tmax Z 9:01sK1:723
2 ½h
reached after sufficient period of time has passed (theoreti- wb R0:03b Tb
cally after tZN). Nevertheless, due to lack of reliable (6)
estimation of the influence parameters it is difficult to use
Eq. (4) practically. They should be estimated for real The basic values have been chosen as: DbZ32 mm,
conditions noticed in boiler convection ducts by taking into wbZ1 m/s, R0.03bZ24.5% and TbZ373 K. The correlation
consideration complicated flow patterns, temperature dis- coefficient was 0.8937 for the following range of
tributions (thermodiffusion) and flue gases composition. As parameters s2Z0.88–1.97, w/wbZ3.8–8.5, R0.03/R0.03bZ
the result of these factors of influence, despite of many 1–2.45, T/TbZ1.68–3.05. In the course of variant
investigations, there is a lack of method for practical fouling calculations, the number of variables was reduced to
calculation. only four with strongest influence on the final result. It
Literature models, similar to the Eq. (4), allow to can be stated that the influence of flue gas velocity and
describe dependence in the form of mdepositZf(t) in order to longitudinal pitch of the tube bank on the total fouling
gain intermediate fouling state after time t. It is obvious that time tmax is of primary importance. Less influence can be
asymptotic form of such models does not allow to calculate associated with particle size distribution of the fly ash and
total fouling time directly as it is by an assumption an flue gas temperature. It must be stressed here that the
infinite time. In course of full-scale experiments conducted obtained equation is, within the range of its validity, with
so far such models do not meet the reality where maximum good conformity with investigations concerning influence
fouling time tmax is precisely specified and finite. of flue gas velocity on overall fouling rate as described in
It is particularly obvious in case of fly ash bridges, which Section 4.3.
do not enlarge themselves after forming. Similar rapid The influence of fouling on heat transfer can be
retardation in fouling rate for other shapes of sediments calculated by means of thermal effectiveness number J
resulting in reaching tmax is also observed in many cases of for various forms of deposits and their properties. However,
practical interest in pulverized coal combustion systems. it is necessary to know the shape, sizes and properties of
Regarding the considerations presented above a different deposits. In fact, these values can hardly be predicted and
principle for estimation of maximum time of fouling must be investigated. To avoid problems, a simplified
936 S. Kalisz, M. Pronobis / Fuel 84 (2005) 927–937
References [9] Abd-Elhady MS, Rindt CCM, Wijers JG, van Steehoven AA,
Bramer EA, van der Meer ThH. Minimum gas speed in heat
exchangers to avoid particulate fouling. Int J Heat Mass Transfer
[1] Pronobis M. Influence of ash deposits on the heat transfer in
2004;47:3943–55.
convection boiler surfaces. Proceedings of the Joint (Technical
[10] Epstein N. Particulate fouling of heat transfer surfaces: mechanisms and
University of Ostrava and Southern Illinois University at Carbondale)
models. In: Melo LF, Bott TR, Bernardo CA, editors. Fouling science
International Conference ‘Coal, Energy and Environment’, Ostrava,
and technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1988. p. 143–64.
Malenovice; 1992.
[11] Huang LY, Norman JS, Pourkashanian M, Williams A. Prediction of
[2] Pronobis M. Bewertung der effektivität von Heizflächenreinigung.
ash deposition on superheater tubes from pulverized coal combustion.
International Conference—Flame Days’99, ‘Combustion and
Fuel 1996;75:271–9.
Environment’, Praha; 1999.
[12] Tomeczek J, Palugniok H, Ochman J. Modelling of deposits
[3] Pronobis M, Kalisz S. Influence of fouling and sootblowing on formation on heating tubes in pulverized coal boilers. Fuel 2004;83:
the heat transfer in convection boiler surfaces. Acta Mech Slov 213–21.
2001;3. [13] Baxter LL, DeSollar RW. A mechanistic description of ash deposition
[4] Laursen K, Frandsen F. Classification system for ash deposits based during pulverized coal combustion: predictions compared with
on SEM analyses. In: Gupta RP, Wall T, Baxter LL, editors. Impact of observations. Fuel 1993;72:1411–8.
mineral impurities in solid fuel combustion. New York: Kluwer [14] Epstein N. Elements of particle deposition onto nonporous solid
Academic/ Plenum Publishers; 1999. surfaces parallel to suspension flows. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 1997;14:
[5] Rafako SA. Boiler Engineering Company. www.rafako.com.pl. 323–34.
[6] Wall TF, Bhattacharya SP, Baxter LL, Richards G, Harb JN. The [15] Taborek J, Aoki T, Ritter RB, Palen JW, Knudsen JG. Fouling: the
character of ash deposits and the thermal performance of furnaces. major unresolved problem in heat transfer. Chem Eng Prog 1972;
Fuel Process Technol 1995;44:143–53. 68(2):59–67.
[7] Laursen K, Frandsen F, Larsen OH. Ash deposition trials at three [16] Kern DQ, Seaton RE. A theoretical analysis of thermal surface
power stations in Denmark. Energy Fuels 1998;12:429–42. fouling. Br Chem Eng 1959;4(5):258–62.
[8] Ots A. Mechanism of ash deposit formation, corrosion and sulphur [17] Pronobis M. Weitere Erkenntnisse zum Einfluß der Verschmutzung
capture by burning calcium and chlorine containing fuels. VGB auf den Wärmeaustausch in Konvektiven Kesselrohrbündeln. VGB
PowerTech 2001;10:114–20. Kraftwerkstechnik 1986;66.