Evaluation Form For OJT

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Republic of the Philippines

CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY


Don Severino delas Alas Campus
Indang, Cavite
COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, ENVIRONMENT, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Institute of Food Science and Technology
OJT / PLANT PRACTICE EVALUATION SHEET
Instrument for Instruction/Teaching Effectiveness

Plant Practice Inclusive Period: ______________________ to ______________________

Name (To be evaluated): ____________________________________________ Designation: ______________________


Evaluator:
O Host Company ____________________________________________________
O Student

O OJT Adviser

Instruction: Please evaluate the faculty using the scale below. Encircle your rating.

Scale Descriptive Rating Qualitative Description

5 Outstanding The performance almost always exceeds the job requirements.

4 Very Satisfactory The performance meets and often exceeds the job requirements
3 Satisfactory The performance meets job requirements

2 Fair The performance needs some development to meet job requirements.

1 Poor The Evaluatee fails to meet job requirements

A. Commitment Scale
Demonstrates sensitivity to OJT trainee’s ability to attend and
1. 5 4 3 2 1
absorb content information.
Integrates sensitively his/her learning objectives with those of the
2. 5 4 3 2 1
students in a collaborative process.
3. Makes self-available to OJT trainee beyond official time. 5 4 3 2 1
Regularly comes on time, well-groomed and well-prepared to
4. 5 4 3 2 1
complete assigned responsibilities.
Keeps accurate records of performance and prompt submission of
5. 5 4 3 2 1
the same.
Total Score
B. Knowledge of Subject / OJT Activities Scale

Demonstrates mastery of the subject matter (explain the subject


1. 5 4 3 2 1
matter without relying solely on the prescribed textbook).

Draws and share information on the state on the art of theory and
2. 5 4 3 2 1
practice in his/her discipline.

Integrates subject to practical circumstances and learning


3. 5 4 3 2 1
intents/purposes of students.
Explains the relevance of present topics to the previous lessons, and
4. relates the subject matter to relevant current issues and/or daily life 5 4 3 2 1
activities.

Demonstrates up-to-date knowledge and/or awareness on current


5. 5 4 3 2 1
trends and issues of the subject.

Total Score

C. Training for Independent Learning in OJT Scale

Creates training strategies that allow OJT trainee to practice using


1. 5 4 3 2 1
concepts they need to understand (interactive discussion).

Enhances OJT Trainees’ self-esteem and/or gives due recognition to


2. 5 4 3 2 1
performance/potentials.

3. Allows OJT Trainees to create their own course with objectives and 5 4 3 2 1
realistically defined student-Trainor rules and make them
accountable for their performance

4. Allows OJT Trainees to think independently and make their own 5 4 3 2 1


decisions and holding them accountable for their performance based
largely on their success in executing decisions.

Encourages OJT Trainees to learn beyond what is required and


5. 5 4 3 2 1
help/guide the OJT trainees how to apply the concepts learned.

Total Score

D. Management of Learning / Training Scale

Creates opportunities for intensive and/or extensive contribution of


1. OJT Trainees in the plant practice activities (e.g. breaks groups into 5 4 3 2 1
dyads, triads or buzz/task groups).

Assumes roles as facilitator, resource person, coach, inquisitor,


2. integrator, referee in drawing students to contribute to knowledge 5 4 3 2 1
and understanding of the concepts at hands.

Designs and implements training / learning conditions and


3. 5 4 3 2 1
experience that promotes healthy exchange and/or confrontations.

Structures/re-structures training and teaching–learning context to


4. 5 4 3 2 1
enhance attainment of collective learning objectives.

Use of Materials ((audio/video materials: fieldtrips, film showing, and


5. 5 4 3 2 1
etc.) to reinforces training processes.

Total Score

Legend for the Formula/Equation:


ts = Total Score

hp = Highest Possible Score


s
% = Percentage

Signature of Evaluator : __________________________


Name of Evaluator : __________________________
Position of Evaluator : __________________________
Date : __________________________

You might also like