ASimplified Approachfor Modelinga Thermal Plumeina Stratified Ambient
ASimplified Approachfor Modelinga Thermal Plumeina Stratified Ambient
net/publication/303819432
CITATIONS READS
0 81
1 author:
Dudley J Benton
McHale Performance
74 PUBLICATIONS 189 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Dudley J Benton on 14 November 2018.
The entrainment for a buoyancy-dominated thermal plume can be estimated from the following
equation:
1 3
QE ρ A - ρ D 3 D 5
=α (1)
QD ρ W
A
where QD and QE are the discharge and entrained flows, α is the entrainment coefficient (an
empirically-derived constant), ρA and ρD are the ambient and discharge density, D is the depth, and
W is the width. This equation assumes constant ambient conditions. An equation for variable
ambient conditions can be obtained by considering a differential equation with a power-law
relationship for the entrained flow:
1
d QE ρ E - ρ P 3 n
=β Z (2)
dZ ρ
E
where ρE and ρP are the entrained and plume density and Z is the vertical distance. For a uniform
ambient the density difference is approximately inversely proportional to the total flow. As the
plume is diluted by the ambient, the difference in density between the plume and the ambient
diminishes proportionally, which invites the following substitution:
n
d QE Z
=β 1 (3)
dZ (Q D + Q E )3
This ordinary separable differential equation can be solved for the dilution:
3
Q Z 4
(n+1)
1 + E = 1 + β (4)
Q D W
In order for the dilution to be proportional to the three-fifths power of the depth, n must equal
minus one-fifth. Further comparison implies:
= 3 α ρ A - ρ D Q D3
Q D+Q E
( ) 9 D
4 1 4 4 dZ
5W 5
∫ (Q D + Q ) d 3 Q D+Q 3
ρA
∫ 1 (6)
QD 0 Z5
where C is the specific heat. For a stratified ambient the density and temperature will vary as the
plume rises and entrains water. Any of a number of numerical integration techniques can be used to
solve these simultaneous integral equations. The fourth-order Runge-Kutta method is used here. A
comparison between field data, two zero-dimensional TVA models, this author’s three-dimensional
model (Benton '89), and the current one-dimensional model is shown in the following figure.
The current one-dimensional plume model uses a separate entrainment coefficient for buoyancy-
driven and momentum-driven entrainment. The effective entrainment coefficient for a
momentum-dominated plume based on the zero-dimensional TVA plume model is compared to
the current one-dimensional plume model in the following figure.
REFERENCES
Abraham, G., and W. Eysink, 1968, "Jets Issuing into a Fluid with a Density Gradient," Journal of
Hydraulic Research, Vol. 7, pp. 145-147.
Adams, E. E., 1972, "Submerged Multiport Diffusers in Shallow Water with Current," Master's
Thesis, Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory for Water Resources and Hydrodynamics, Department of
Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Alavian, V., P. Ostrowski, and J. A. Parsly, 1988, "Two Computer Models for Diffuser
Performance Evaluation," TVA Report WR28-1-900-162.
Albertson, M. L., Y. B. Dai, R. A. Jensen, and H. Rouse, 1948, "Diffusion of Submerged Jets,"
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Paper No. 2409.
Almquist, C. W., C. D. Ungate, and W. R. Walrdop, 1978, "Field Model Results for Multiport
Diffuser Plume," Proceedings of the ASCE Conference on Verification of Mathematical and
Physical Models in Hydraulic Engineering, College Park, Maryland.
Almquist, C. W., 1978, "Submerged Multiport Diffuser Analysis and Design for Hartsville Nuclear
Plant," TVA Report WR28-1-89-100.
Benton, D. J., "Development of a Two-Dimensional Plume Model for Positively and Negatively
Buoyant Discharges into a Stratified Flowing Ambient, " Tennessee Water Resources
Symposium, 1989.
Cederwall, K., 1975, "Gross Parameter Solutions of Jets and Plumes," ASCE Journal of the
Hydraulics Division, Vol. 101, No. HY5.