Module 3 WM Notes
Module 3 WM Notes
BY,
Mrs. Chaithra K.S .,
Assistant Professor,
JVIT, BIDADI
Collection components
Storage-containers/collection vehicles
Collection operation
Transfer station
Waste collection system design
Record keeping, control, inventory and monitoring
Implementing collection and transfer system
A Case study
Waste Disposal
DISPOSAL OPTIONS
SELECTION CRITERIA
1. Technical
This feature, involving efficient and effective operation of the technology being used,
evaluates the following components of a SWM system
Composition of wastes, e.g., type, characteristics and quantity
Existing practices, e.g., collection, transport, and recycling process.
Siting, e.g., location of disposal site, engineering material, etc.
Technology, e.g., operation, maintenance, technical support, etc.
Impact, e.g., anticipated by-product, requirement for their treatment and disposal, etc.
2. Institutional
This involves the ability and willingness of responsible agencies to operate and manage the
system by evaluating the following
Structures, roles and responsibilities, e.g., current institutional frameworks.
Operational capacity, e.g., municipal capacities, local experience and staff training.
Incentives, e.g., management improvement and waste disposal practices.
Innovation and partnership.
3. Financial
This assesses the ability to finance the implementation, operation and maintenance of the
system by evaluating the following
Financing and cost recovery, e.g., willingness to raise finance for waste management.
SANITARY LANDFILL
The four minimum requirements you need to consider for a sanitary landfill are:
(i) full or partial hydrological isolation
(ii)formal engineering preparation
(iii)permanent control
(iv)planned waste emplacement and covering
1. PRINCIPLE
The purpose of land filling is to bury or alter the chemical composition of the wastes
so that they do not pose any threat to the environment or public health. Landfills are not
homogeneous and are usually made up of cells in which a discrete volume of waste is kept
isolated from adjacent waste cells by a suitable barrier.
The barriers between cells generally consist of a layer of natural soil (i.e., clay), which
restricts downward or lateral escape of the waste constituents or leachate.
Land filling relies on containment rather than treatment (for control) of wastes. If properly
executed, it is a safer and cheaper method than incineration.
Figure below gives a schematic layout of sanitary landfill along with its various components
2. LANDFILL PROCESSES
(i) Site selection process and considerations
This requires the development of a working plan, outlining the development and descriptions
of site location, operation, engineering and site restoration.
Include public opinion, traffic patterns and congestion, climate, zoning requirements,
availability of cover material and liner as well, high trees or buffer in the site perimeter,
historic buildings, and endangered species, wetlands, and site land
environmental factors, speed limits, underpass limitations, load limits on roadways, bridge
capacities, and proximity of major roadways, haul distance, hydrology and detours.
(ii) Settling process
The waste body of a landfill undergoes different stages of settling or deformation.
Leachate can pollute both groundwater and surface water supplies. The degree of pollution
will depend on local geology and hydrogeology, nature of waste and the proximity of
susceptible receptors. Once groundwater is contaminated, it is very costly to clean it up.
Landfills, therefore, undergo siting, design and construction procedures that control leachate
migration.
The environmental effects of a landfill include wind-blown litter and dust, noise, obnoxious
odour, vermin and insects attracted by the waste, surface runoff and in aesthetic conditions.
1. Wind-blown litter and dust are continuous problems of the on-going landfill operation
and a nuisance to the neighbourhood. Covering the waste cells with soil and spraying
water on dirt roads and waste in dry periods, in combination with fencing and movable
screens, may minimise the problem of wind-blown litter and dust.
2. Movementof waste collection vehicles, emptying of wastes from them,compactors, earth
moving equipment, etc., produce noise. Improving the technical capability of the
equipment, surrounding the fill area with soil embankments and plantations, limiting the
working hours and appropriately training the workforce will help minimise noise
pollution.
3. Birds, vermin, insects and animals are attracted to the landfill for
feeding and breeding. Since many of these may act as disease vectors, their presence is a
potential health problem.
4. Surface run-off, which has been in contact with the land filled waste, may be a problem
in areas of intense rainfall. If not controlled, heavily polluted run-off may enter directly
into creeks and streams.
A CASE STUDY
Bangalore city, India’s Silicon Valley, situated in the Deccan plateau’s Southeastern
side.This city is located at 12.9716° N, 77.5946° E. Average temperature lies between 26.1℃
and 15.1℃ with an average precipitation of 970 mm. Rivers flowing nearby include
Vrishabhavati and Arkavati. City is located at an altitude of 920m from sea level.
Segregation of solid waste is one of the biggest crises in Bangalore, by measures of BBMP
and private waste collectors 15-20% of solid waste is segregated before reaching any
landfill/dumping yard. Waste collection in Bangalore occurs primarily by Poura karmikas
and BBMP workers who collect wastes door-to-door and carried by carts. Then the waste is
managed by landfills or by voluntary involvement of Non-Governmental Organizations
(NGO’s) or by private vendors. In growing cities like Bangalore, waste production increases
exponentially due to emerging living standards, population explosion, and development in
industries and IT sectors. Management issues in solid wastes can even effect in pollution of
water, air, and soil also. It needs to review the current scenario of Bangalore city for solid
waste management and disposal techniques.
Wastes produced in Bangalore that are around 5000-6000 tones can be categorized as
Organic, Recyclables, E-waste, and debris. Organic waste comprises around 60-70% of
total wastes. Measures were taken by Govt. of Karnataka include disposal of wastes produced
by large organizations like hotels, apartments, railway stations, holy places, aerodromes, at
private vendors, or management of left-overs in their own grounds using biogas plants or
sewage treatment plants.
Individual waste producers such as houses and small shops are directed to dispose of wastes
in civic waste accumulators.
Even after actions taken by Govt. of Karnataka, only 7-8% of waste is controlled and
recycled and rest is discarded in landfill sites in outskirts of Bangalore. Although the design
period of landfill sites is 5-10 years, the quantity of waste formed and indecorous
management has directed to the closure of many sites and also contaminated its surrounds.
Samples of water were collected to analyze the amount of contamination. Samples 1,2,3 were
collected from the surroundings of the Mavallipura landfill site near Yelahanka, Bangalore.
Samples 4,5 were collected from the surroundings of the landfill in Mittaganahalli,
Yelahanka. Samples 6,7 were collected in the surroundings of the Bellahalli landfill site,
Yelahanka. It was carefully collected in clean and sterile containers.
The samples were analyzed in a laboratory for water parameters with standard methods.
Characteristics such as pH, Electrical conductivity, Alkalinity, dissolved solids, calcium,
magnesium, potassium, and others were tested, and results were compared with BIS
permissible limits.
Parameters such as BOD, COD, Electrical conductivity, lead, nickel, nitrates, PO4, sodium,
calcium, and alkalinity are elevated beyond standard limits as shown by the above tests.
Waste management is one of important aspect should be well organized by BBMP and should
not allow any harm to nature.