Scribd
Upload
48 views1 page

Essay Rubric

The document outlines criteria for evaluating sources used in an assignment across six categories: quantity of sources, quality/reliability of sources, variety of sources, grammar/punctuation/clarity, content of annotations, and APA and documentation. Each category is rated on a scale from A to F, with A being excellent adherence to criteria and F being poor or no adherence. The criteria examine aspects such as number of sources, reliability, variety, writing mechanics, annotation content, and citation formatting.

Uploaded by

baba tounde
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
48 views1 page

Essay Rubric

The document outlines criteria for evaluating sources used in an assignment across six categories: quantity of sources, quality/reliability of sources, variety of sources, grammar/punctuation/clarity, content of annotations, and APA and documentation. Each category is rated on a scale from A to F, with A being excellent adherence to criteria and F being poor or no adherence. The criteria examine aspects such as number of sources, reliability, variety, writing mechanics, annotation content, and citation formatting.

Uploaded by

baba tounde
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Category A B C D F

Quantity of Document cites Document is one Document is two Document is Document is


sources the number of source under the to three under four to five more than five
sources outlined required number the required sources under sources under
in assignment of sources number of the required the number of
sources number of required sources
sources

Quality All sources cited Most sources Some sources Few sources Little or no
/Reliability can be cited can be can be cited can be reliable and/or
of Sources considered considered considered considered trustworthy
reliable and/or reliable and/or reliable and/or reliable and/or sources cited.
trustworthy. trustworthy. trustworthy. trustworthy.

Variety of Excellent variety Good variety of Adequate variety Poor variety No variety of
Sources of sources sources (one of sources (at (missing one sources; does not
(several of each) type is marginal) least one of type of source) cite either types
each) of sources
required

Grammar Very few An average # of An average # of Many Many


Punctuation grammar/punctu grammar/punctu grammar/punctu grammar/punctu grammar/punctu
Clarity ation errors and ation errors or ation errors and ation errors and ation errors and
annotations are annotations have annotations have annotations are annotations are
clear and some some disorganized and disorganized and
organized (ideas organizational organizational not clear. not clear.
flow easily) problems. problems.

Content of Annotations are Annotations of Annotations are Annotations are Annotations are
Annotation complete and sources are good fairly inadequate incomplete and completely
thorough; but may not be for all sources or inadequate. For inadequate. Does
supplies the completely some sources are example, the not summarize
reader with thorough on all missing many student may or evaluate the
information sources or all criteria for have described sources.
regarding the sources are evaluation the source, but
content, evaluated by did not evaluate
usefulness, and limited criteria it.
reliability

APA and Citations are There are a few There are some There are many There is little or
Documentat formatted formatting errors formatting errors and/or frequent no adherence to
ion correctly in the in the in the formatting errors APA format in
document. document’s document’s in the the document.
citations. citations. document’s
citations.

You might also like