Detailed Rubrics

RUBRICS FOR PRESENTATION
CONTENT (4.0 points)

4.
● Provides coherent explanations without prompting on all topics
0
● Presents decisions persuasively and appropriately for varying contexts
● Recommendations are appropriate and supported with explanations
● Justifies position, regularly paraphrasing and elaborating to explain and/or clarify
● Presents concisely and accurately; little to no reliance on written material
● Strictly adheres to time allowance
● Strictly relates to the topic

3.0
● Provides coherent explanations, usually without prompting, on all concrete and most abstract
pts
topics
● Usually presents decisions persuasively, and usually appropriately for context
● Usually contributes and appropriately to the development of the interaction; very aware of
listener
● Provides recommendations that are almost always supported with explanations and are
appropriate to the context
● Justifies position, frequently paraphrasing and elaborating to explain and/or clarify statements
● Communication breakdowns usually do not occur.
● Presents concisely and accurately; some reliance on written material
● Slightly exceeds or fails to reach time allowance

2.0
● Elaborates, often without prompting, and provide coherent explanations on almost all concrete
and many abstract topics
● Often presents decisions clearly, appropriately; may occasionally show some limitations in
ability to extend discourse and to provide convincing explanations
● Often contributes and appropriately to development of interaction; aware of listener; may
occasionally rely on interlocutors for continuation of discussion
● Recommendations may require minor prompting for supporting explanations; may occasionally
be awkwardness to appropriateness of word choices/phrasing
● Justifies position adequately; usually able to paraphrase; clarity of meaning may occasionally
be lacking when providing
supporting details
● Communication breakdowns may occur during challenging speech events; usually repaired
● Adequately presents; may rely on written material periodically
1.0
● Occasionally able, when prompted, to elaborate and provide explanations on most concrete
topics; explanations frequently lack coherence and organization
● Usually presents decisions by repeating language already produced
● Frequently relies on other participants to initiate, develop, maintain discourse; rarely offers
feedback or commentary
● Usually able to recommend; occasionally able, when prompted, to provide supporting
explanations
● Attempts to justify a position are usually unclear and repetitive
● Communication breakdowns may occur during any speech event and often are not repaired
● Usually presents by repeating language already provided

ORGANIZATION/CLARITY (2.0 points)
2.0
● Uses a broad range of business lexicons
● Collocations, colloquial language, and idiomatic expressions are often used and are usually
accurate and appropriate
● Occasionally uses secondary meaning of words
● Usually uses a variety of basic and complex grammatical structures accurately and usually
effectively
● Usually uses grammatical structures that are pragmatically appropriate
1.5
● Often uses moderate range of lexicons accurately and appropriately
● Occasionally uses idiomatic expressions and colloquial language
● Occasionally uses incorrect collocations that may lead to vagueness
● Often uses a variety of basic and complex grammatical structures accurately and effectively
● Often uses a variety of grammatical structures that are pragmatically appropriate

1.0
● Uses limited range of lexicons
● Frequently uses vague and/or inaccurate lexicons
● Frequently uses basic structures (i.e., lack of complex sentences) that often contain errors
● Range of vocabulary and grammatical structures extends beyond what has been provided orally
and/or in writing
● Gaps and/or errors in lexicons and/or grammar, sometimes self-corrected, frequently do not
hinder communication, but may rarely cause interruptions in communication flow
● Accuracy in vocabulary and/or grammar often declines with an increase in rate of speech
1
and/or with more challenging speech event
0.5
● Limited range of lexicons
● Frequently uses vague and/or inaccurate lexicons
● Vocabulary and grammar structures used are typically repetitions of what has been provided
orally or in writing
● Gaps and/or errors in vocabulary and grammar may disrupt effective communication
DELIVERY / FLUENCY (2.0 points)
2.0
● Fluently delivers the speech
● Often uses rate of speech and/or prosodic features to add meaning, aid listener, and/or to shift
style/register appropriately
1.5
● Frequently fluent and articulate; may require minimal listener effort
● Usually uses rate of speech and/or prosodic features to add meaning, to aid listener, and/or to
shift style/register
appropriately
● Fluency may slightly decline with challenging speech events but this rarely affects the flow of
discourse
1.0
● Often fluent, usually articulate; may require some listener effort
● Pace usually consistent; may occasionally be relatively slow
● Occasionally uses rate of speech, and/or prosodic features to add meaning, aid listener, and/or
to shift style/register
appropriately
● An increase in rate of delivery may occasionally lead to a decrease in clarity of speech or
comprehensibility.
● Fluency may decline with more challenging speech events but this does not stop the flow of
discourse.
0.5
● Listener effort frequently required.
● Delivery is often slow and halting.
● Pausing and phrasing are often incorrect, negatively affecting intelligibility.
● Production may be word by word, resulting in a lack of sentence rhythm and flat intonation.
● L1 influence may disrupt intelligibility.

INTERACTION/VISUALIZATION (2.0 points)
2.0
● Contributes consistently and appropriately to development of interaction; very aware of listener
● Responsive to the speaker
2
● Communication breakdowns are rare.
● Graphs/figures are clear and understandable.
● The text is readable and clear.
● Audio/Visual components support all the main points of the talk.
● Appropriate referencing of data that is/was not generated by presenter

1.5
● Maintains simple exchanges
● Requires little prompting and support despite some difficulty
● Graphs/figures are quite clear and understandable.
● The text is quite readable and clear.
● Audio/Visual components support most main points of the talk.
● Quite appropriate referencing of data that is/was not generated by presenter

1.0
● Has considerable difficulty maintaining simple exchanges.
● Requires additional prompting and support
● Graphs/figures are somehow clear and understandable.
● The text is somehow readable and clear.
● Audio/Visual components support fundamental main points of the talk.
● Less appropriate referencing of data that is/was not generated by presenter

0.5
● Unable to listen attentively or respond appropriately while performing most tasks; interacts
poorly with a partner.
● Requires lots of repetition or support
● Graphs/figures are limited.
● The text is almost unreadable and unclear.
● Limited Audio/Visual components support the main points of the talk.
● Inappropriate/Insufficient referencing of data that is/was not generated by presenter

* Scores can be detailed up to 0.1, depending on the candidate's proficiency.

Detailed Rubrics

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Detailed Rubrics

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Detailed Rubrics

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RUBRICS FOR PRESENTATION

CONTENT (4.0 points)

● Recommendations are appropriate and supported with explanations

● Justifies position, regularly paraphrasing and elaborating to explain and/or clarify

● Presents concisely and accurately; little to no reliance on written material

● Strictly adheres to time allowance

● Strictly relates to the topic

● Communication breakdowns usually do not occur.

● Presents concisely and accurately; some reliance on written material

● Slightly exceeds or fails to reach time allowance

● Usually presents by repeating language already provided

● Occasionally uses idiomatic expressions and colloquial language

● Occasionally uses incorrect collocations that may lead to vagueness

● Often uses a variety of grammatical structures that are pragmatically appropriate

● Frequently uses vague and/or inaccurate lexicons

● Frequently uses vague and/or inaccurate lexicons

● Pace usually consistent; may occasionally be relatively slow

● Delivery is often slow and halting.

● Pausing and phrasing are often incorrect, negatively affecting intelligibility.

● L1 influence may disrupt intelligibility.

● Responsive to the speaker

● Graphs/figures are clear and understandable.

● The text is readable and clear.

● Audio/Visual components support all the main points of the talk.

● Appropriate referencing of data that is/was not generated by presenter

● Requires little prompting and support despite some difficulty

● Graphs/figures are quite clear and understandable.

● The text is quite readable and clear.

● Audio/Visual components support most main points of the talk.

● Quite appropriate referencing of data that is/was not generated by presenter

● Requires additional prompting and support

● Graphs/figures are somehow clear and understandable.

● The text is somehow readable and clear.

● Audio/Visual components support fundamental main points of the talk.

● Less appropriate referencing of data that is/was not generated by presenter

● Graphs/figures are limited.

● The text is almost unreadable and unclear.

● Limited Audio/Visual components support the main points of the talk.

● Inappropriate/Insufficient referencing of data that is/was not generated by presenter

You might also like