Practical Model For Optimal Carbon Control With Distributed Energy Resources
Practical Model For Optimal Carbon Control With Distributed Energy Resources
ABSTRACT The generation, consumption, and transmission of distributed energy produced by a microgrid
are becoming increasingly important topics in scientific research. As a power source that partly relies on
renewable energy, microgrids play a vital role in the global energy network. In this study, the underlying
principles and management techniques of microgrids are introduced. Microgrids can reduce the carbon
footprint of the energy production process. This study also provides insight into how decision-makers can
confidently mitigate the uncertainties inherent in this kind of renewable energy system by proposing an
optimization algorithm for microgrid energy management. By investigating several commercial microgrid
cases, a mathematical model that allows the user to arrive at the optimal trade-off between energy generation
and carbon production in a given scenario is created. Careful analysis of energy transactions and distributed
energy sources indicates that energy blockchain technology is a valuable asset for expanding the use of
clean energies, reducing carbon emissions in power and optimizing microgrid power management. Finally,
the challenges of microgrid energy management and potential transaction models for the energy blockchain
are discussed.
INDEX TERMS Distributed energy resources, decarbonized power, energy blockchain power generation,
microgrid, optimal scheduling, peer-to-peer transactions, power use balance, renewable energy.
power of photovoltaic cells is commonly expressed as make overall energy production difficult to predict and
follows [32]: control on a daily basis [20]. In general, the amount of wind
SI AC [1 + k(Tc − Tr )] energy generated at night surpasses the amount of energy
PPV = PSTC (1) generated in the daytime [33] (Fig. 3).
SI STC
where it is assumed that the photovoltaic arrays are equipped
with maximum power tracking (MPPT) devices:
PPV : the output power of the photovoltaic cell;
SIAC : the actual light intensity;
PSTC : the maximum output power under standard test
conditions (the incident light intensity is 1000 W/m2 , and the
ambient temperature is 25◦ C);
SISTC : the light intensity under standard test conditions,
which is set to 1000 W/m2 ;
k: the temperature coefficient of the output power;
Tc : the actual working temperature of the solar pane;
Tr : the reference temperature.
Although the variations in the light intensity are largely FIGURE 3. Typical wind turbine output over a 24-hour period.
caused by the daily rotation and seasonal revolution of the
Earth around the sun, random factors such as cloud movement Ideally, when a wind turbine is running, the fan blades
and abnormal shielding can reduce the amount of light should be oriented perpendicular to the direction of the wind.
received by these photovoltaic cells. During the day, the The amount of energy produced by a wind turbine depends
received light intensity and the energy output are related to the on the wind speed, the radius of the generator, and the air
cosine of the sun’s zenith angle and the sunny index (Fig. 2). density. The theoretical output power of a wind turbine is
1
PWT = Cp ρπr 2 v3 (2)
2
where
PWT : the output power of the wind turbine generator;
ρ: the air density.
Cp : a wind energy utilization factor, for which the
maximum value is 0.593.
v: the real-time wind speed.
Because the wind speed is uncontrollable, it is necessary
to predict the wind speed in advance to estimate the output
power of the wind turbine. These predictions rely on data
from weather forecasting systems near the installation site
FIGURE 2. Typical daily photovoltaic output over a 24-hour period. of the wind turbine. The weather data are then run through
a series of calculation processes (e.g., those involving wind
speed-power characteristic curves or equations provided by
2) THE POWER OUTPUT CHARACTERISTICS OF manufacturers) to generate the wind power projections for a
A WIND TURBINE given day.
Wind energy is a clean and pollution-free source of renewable
energy. Due to the uneven heating of the Earth’s surface by the 3) ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
sun and the Coriolis effect (which arises due to the rotation Considerable volatility and uncertainty are inherent in renew-
of the Earth), the potential for producing wind energy has able energy sources. The increasing number of renewable
always existed on our planet. Wind turbines convert wind energy sources that have been incorporated into the power
energy into mechanical energy; this mechanical energy is grid poses an enormous challenge for the safe and reliable
then converted into electrical energy through electromagnetic operation of the power system. With an energy storage system
induction. The process of manufacturing wind turbines is that controls the distribution of electricity, it is possible to
more environmentally friendly/cleaner than that for solar mitigate the uncertainty in renewable energy systems [34].
photovoltaic cells. Due to new industrial and scientific Energy storage systems perform many operations. Mainly,
developments and increased buy-in from consumers, wind these storage systems reduce fluctuations in the amount of
power technology has greatly matured in the past two power generated by unstable energy systems such as solar
decades. power and wind power [34]–[36]. Second, by maintaining
While the output power of wind turbines mostly depends the stability of the distributed power network, balancing the
on the ambient wind speed, the contributions of other factors power demand, and reducing system disturbances, an energy
schedulable or unschedulable. While fuel units such as through the use of smart devices (e.g., smart switches and
diesel engines are considered schedulable, the volatility smart thermostats).
of wind power and solar energy production causes these
energy sources to be classified as unschedulable. Despite B. ENERGY OPTIMIZATION SCHEDULING
this classification, it is possible to exert some degree of In both smart microgrids and other DERs, it can be difficult
control over these energy sources; however, the amount of to quickly meet the demand with the existing energy supply.
control tends to decrease as the power system becomes more Both the supply and demand sides of energy systems must be
complex. With accurate predictions of the energy flow in the closely regulated and managed. Due to inherent uncertainty
EMS of a microgrid, it is possible for decision-makers to and stochastic volatility in renewable energy sources such as
efficiently and accurately allocate schedulable units. solar and wind power, difficulties in predicting the available
power supply can result in price challenges and an inability
2) ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
to meet power demands in real time [41].
These uncertainties can be mitigated by employing energy
An energy storage system is a vital part of an EMS. One such
optimization scheduling techniques. By collecting data on
storage source, lithium batteries, is generally noise free and
power generation, load usage, energy storage, and current
has a high power capacity and a high energy density. Due to
grid/microgrid pricing, it is possible to make optimal man-
recent technological developments, alternative energy storage
agement choices by controlling the energy flow. Achieving a
systems such as electric vehicles (EVs) are also becoming
balance between demand and supply improves the efficiency
popular. By storing energy in electric vehicles, it is possible
of the energy management system and results in numerous
to ameliorate the intermittency of renewable energy sources,
economic benefits. Utilizing energy optimization scheduling
facilitate peak cutting and valley filling, and improve the
techniques in a microgrid offsets issues that arise due to the
operational efficiency of the system.
starting or stopping of a generator, the charge/discharge of an
EVs can be regarded as storage subsystems in the DER that
energy storage system, the transfer of an electric load to one
can be scheduled in advance depending on the output of the
or more users, and the control of the power output via peak
microgrid. This energy storage system stores electric energy
cutting and valley filling.
when there is a surplus; when there is an energy deficit,
In a microgrid, the user’s energy consumption costs and
the energy stored in the EVs can be released back into the
satisfaction with their power usage experience are two
DER. In general, electric storage systems perform four main
parameters that management can attempt to optimize. In a
functions in a microgrid: (1) suppressing dangerous electric
large power grid, decision-makers primarily focus on safely
power fluctuations, (2) facilitating peak cutting and valley
and effectively operating both the connected microgrids and
filling when the microgrid is connected to a large power grid,
the power grid as a whole by mitigating power fluctuations.
(3) achieving a power use balance (PUB) between power
Regardless of whether the grid is a typical large grid or
generation and power usage to ensure the self-sufficiency and
a microgrid, it is possible to use mathematical models or
stability of the microgrid when it is not connected to a large
algorithms to optimize the targets of interest.
power network, and (4) providing power to those in need
Many researchers have thoroughly investigated microgrid
during an emergency.
energy management systems to find ways to reduce operating
In summary, the management of the energy storage system
costs and identify more efficient ways to supply energy at
is informed by the operational activities of the microgrid,
small scales [41], [42], [42]–[46].
which can be scheduled and managed according to existing
To find the best way to achieve specific target goals,
power systems and/or local energy needs.
management can apply matchmaking models to these
microgrids. These matchmaking models account for various
3) POWER DEMAND MANAGEMENT microgrid factors, including the energy generation process,
To ensure that a microgrid can meet the relevant energy regulatory constraints, and microgrid price incentives. There
demands during emergencies, microgrid loads are generally are numerous algorithms that can be employed in these
classified as critical loads, controllable loads, or uncontrol- matchmaking models.
lable loads. Power systems must be able to meet the critical Xiao et al. proposed a coordinated scheduling method
load requirement at any given moment. that is based on model predictive control [42]. In the day-
In an emergency, the controllable load can be cut off or before stage, the best schedule is one that minimizes the
adjusted as needed. Under normal circumstances, the purpose system operating cost; notably, in the day-before stage,
of optimizing load use and energy savings can be achieved intraday rolling optimization is applied for power fluctuation
by managing the response to the demand. For example, correction. This correction is based on real-time state
transferable loads such as heat loads can be used when feedback, which largely eliminates any uncertainty in the
electricity prices are low and the system is not experiencing a energy regulation process.
peak demand. The load in a given household is directly related To minimize the equivalent power supply cost,
to the user’s electricity preferences and comfort level; users Meng et al. [43] employed a real-time energy scheduling
can apply oversight to their power needs and consumption optimization method. Their model is based on a network flow
model that, by utilizing ES state of charge (SOC) day-before balance constraint must be satisfied:
scheduling, can reduce the daily power supply cost by more
PtCP = PtPG + PtES + PtGP (4)
than 30%.
Using Lyapunov optimization theory, Fan [44] studied a where
single-user microgrid with the goal of reducing electricity PtCP : Electricity power demand of consumers;
costs. By constructing a controllable load queue, they PtPG : The generating power of a generator;
transformed the energy management problem into a more PtES : Exchange power of energy storage systems;
straightforward calculation. The controllable load of the PtGP : Exchange power of microgrids and power grids.
microgrid can be adjusted in real time based on data gathered The second row of the matrix represents the net electricity
via the internet, and a constant stream of data allows the cost that arises due to operation of the microgrid. The net
microgrid to efficiently operate. electricity cost is the sum of income and expenses. Income is
To explore new energy allocation strategies, Long [45] generated when users purchase electricity from the microgrid
devised a model that uses an optimization algorithm to and/or the power grid. By managing peaks, valleys, and
minimize electricity costs and to identify obstacles that users storage, it should be possible to maintain a balance between
might encounter when attempting to utilize power from a supply and demand without costly spikes or deficits on either
given energy source. side. The expenditures of a microgrid include fuel costs,
Zhang [46] established an island-type microscale mixed- operating costs, equipment/energy loss costs, maintenance
integer programming model for net energy management. costs, and the cost of purchasing electricity from a larger grid.
Using numerical methods, this model minimizes the total The net electricity cost of operating a microgrid is
operating costs and the power loss. In a case study, the authors expressed as
demonstrated that demand-side energy management reduces
ctECO = ctECO_PG + ctECO_ES + ctECO_EX (5)
operating costs, improves the utilization of renewable energy
resources, and increases the flexibility of these independent 1) The cost of operating a distributed generator is:
micro-networks.
ctECOPG = KCPG ∗(PtPG ∗ τ )
C. OPTIMAL SCHEDULING MODEL = (KPG_f + KPG_ll + KPG_opm )∗(PtPG ∗ τ ) (6)
The energy optimization scheduling of a microgrid is a multi- where
objective optimization problem with multiple constraints. KC_PG : The cost coefficient of generating 1 kWh of
The objective of optimization is to achieve the maximum electricity from a generator;
comprehensive benefit through the reasonable coordination KPG−f : The fuel cost coefficient of generating 1 kWh of
of source-grid/storage-load scheduling. The microgrid can electricity from a generator;
operate either in grid-connected mode or in independent KPG−ll : The equipment depreciation cost coefficient of
mode, both of which require proper scheduling of the generating 1 kWh of electricity from a generator;
distributed power supply, battery, and load. For example, KPG−opm : The operating and maintenance cost coefficient
the microgrid must operate more reliably when it does of generating 1 kWh of electricity from a generator.
in independent operation mode; as such, the scheduling 2) The cost of operating an energy storage system is
process is more complex. Because the microgrid operates expressed as
more stably and reliably in grid-connected mode, energy
optimization scheduling mainly focuses on achieving eco- ctECOES = KCES ∗(PtES ∗ τ )
nomic and environmental objectives. The matrix model for a = (KBat−opm + KBat−ll + KBat−el ∗(PtES ∗ τ ) (7)
grid-connected microgrid that aims to meet certain economic
where
and environmental goals is expressed as
t t KC_ES : The cost coefficient of charging and discharging
PCP 1 1 1 PPG 1 kWh of electricity from the energy storage system;
ct = KC_PG KC_ES KC_EX ∗ Pt ∗ τ KBat−opm : The operating and maintenance cost coefficient
ECO ES
etCD KCD_PG KCD− ES KCD− GP PtGP of charging and discharging 1 kWh of electricity from the
(3) energy storage system;
KBat−ll : The equipment depreciation cost coefficient of
where τ = 1tT , 1t is the scheduling time, and T is 1 hour. For charging and discharging 1 kWh of electricity from the
example, if the scheduling time is 10 minutes, τ = 1/6.
energy storage system;
In the microgrid economics and carbon emission cal-
KBat−el : The energy loss cost coefficient of charging and
culation model, the first row of the matrix indicates that
discharging 1 kWh of electricity from the energy storage
the power demand of the load in the microgrid must be
system.
met by the current level of energy generation, the available
3) Income and the cost of purchasing energy from an
stored energy, and the energy provided by a large external
external power grid are expressed as
power grid (i.e., consumers can use electricity without service
disruptions). To maintain a specific power quality, the power ctECO_EX = KC_EX ∗ (PtGP ∗ τ ) (8)
TABLE 1. Comparison of carbon emissions estimated with various TABLE 2. Comparison of economic costs estimated with various methods.
methods.
lost or equipment is damaged, serious financial and social the power grid before conducting transactions. A complete
consequences will occur. Furthermore, over-centralization trading cycle consists of the trading stage and the delivery
leads to information asymmetry, and it can be difficult to stage, where the delivery stage of a given trading cycle is
protect the privacy of consumers. also the trading stage of the following trading cycle. These
It is possible for distributed energy networks to adopt two stages are further subdivided into the free quotation
supply-side point-to-point transaction models. The challenge stage, the prepayment stage, the power delivery stage, and the
facing energy producers is to create distribution networks automatic cost settlement stage. Ideally, in a transaction credit
that are safe, efficient, transparent and allow for symmetrical score/system, the number of defaults that occur in distributed
information sharing between energy buyers and sellers. energy transactions should be minimized.
However, there are three major issues facing those wishing By observing multiple energy transactions,
to immediately implement this kind of point-to-point system. Ouyang et al. [65] created a blockchain energy system
First, there are many power producers and consumers com- that relies on the principles of voluntary participation and
peting for a single transaction. Second, there is uncertainty independent negotiation to regulate the transactions that
and volatility inherent in every producer’s ability to generate occur between power users and power generation enterprises.
energy at a given point in time. Finally, producers may wish Our proposed energy transaction blockchain is shown in
to increase their financial gain at the expense of an efficient Figure 6.
pricing strategy.
Blockchain technology [57]–[62] has led to new transac-
tion frameworks that are decentralized and allow users to
track data in decentralized markets. By using blockchain
methods in both distributed and decentralized energy net-
works, it is possible to ensure that each transaction is secure,
reliable, and transparent. These transactions are controlled
by distributed and in-house cost-effective centers rather than
outside third-party centers.
In a decentralized energy system, energy supply con-
tracts can be directly communicated between producers
and consumers. Adding an energy blockchain results in
a considerable number of transactions between producers
and consumers, which makes each transaction less expen-
sive overall. Blockchains facilitate direct interactions and
transactions between local energy producers and consumers
by eliminating the necessity for a third-party monitoring
platform. FIGURE 6. Our proposed energy trading blockchain.
Because blockchain transactions are encrypted and not
stored in a central location, it is difficult to tamper with
blockchain data. By utilizing blockchain technology in a V. CONCLUSION
smart microgrid, users can return unused electricity directly Microgrids are becoming more common, and they must be
to the grid. In a microgrid, the balance between supply and managed correctly for society to maximally benefit from their
demand can also be maintained by storing excess power operation. One way to increase the operational efficiency
when the demand unexpectedly rises. This energy storage of a microgrid is to schedule microgrid activities using an
approach ensures that the amount of power stays within energy blockchain. Our proposed energy management system
the predetermined power limits. After considering network improves microgrid operation in four ways:
constraints, Tai et al. [63] proposed setting up a central station 1) By accurately predicting the energy output, scheduling
that has the power to block, modify, or accept transactions makes the best use of the available energy resources.
based on how much power is available at a given point in time; 2) Energy management optimization algorithms can con-
this transaction history is then recorded in the blockchain. sider both expected and unexpected demands for power
Using blockchain and smart contracts, Shen et al. [64] to be provided in a stable, safe, and cost-efficient
implemented a system of self-management for power market fashion.
participants, and this approach both ensured the security 3) At the microgrid energy transaction level, a peer-to-
of the power grid and solved ledger trust issues among peer transaction mode based on a blockchain approach
power market participants. Because electric energy is a can promote transactions with low marginal costs and
physical asset rather than a piece of virtual data, each power is characterized by immutability and high transparency.
transaction must be guaranteed by the power grid. 4) Utilizing an energy blockchain ensures that peer-
All of the power producers and consumers must report to-peer transactions are transparent, secure, and
their account numbers and corresponding entity identities to inexpensive.
ABBREVIATION [13] A. G. Olabi, ‘‘Renewable energy and energy storage systems,’’ Energy,
PCC: Point of common coupling. vol. 136, pp. 1–6, Oct. 2017.
[14] J. Ming, J. Guo, C. Xia, W. Wang, and H. N. Alshareef, ‘‘Zinc-ion
PUM: Power utility matrix. batteries: Materials, mechanisms, and applications,’’ Mater. Sci. Eng. R,
DER: Distributed energy resource. Rep., vol. 135, pp. 58–84, Jan. 2019.
PUB: Power use balance. [15] A. Valera-Medina, H. Xiao, M. Owen-Jones, W. I. F. David, and
P. J. Bowen, ‘‘Ammonia for power,’’ Prog. Energy Combustion Sci.,
P2P: Point to point. vol. 69, pp. 63–102, Nov. 2018.
EBC: Energy blockchain. [16] W. Huang, N. Zhang, J. Yang, Y. Wang, and C. Kang, ‘‘Optimal
PV: Photovoltaic. configuration planning of multi-energy systems considering distributed
renewable energy,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1452–1464,
EMS: Energy management system. Oct. 2017.
ES: Energy storage. [17] E. Guelpa and V. Verda, ‘‘Thermal energy storage in district heating
SOC: State of charge. and cooling systems: A review,’’ Appl. Energy, vol. 252, Oct. 2019,
Art. no. 113474.
EV: Electric vehicle. [18] T. Morstyn and M. D. McCulloch, ‘‘Multiclass energy management for
GP: Grid power. peer-to-peer energy trading driven by prosumer preferences,’’ IEEE Trans.
IoT: Internet of Things. Power Syst., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 4005–4014, Sep. 2019.
[19] M. Andoni, V. Robu, D. Flynn, S. Abram, D. Geach, D. Jenkins,
P. McCallum, and A. Peacock, ‘‘Blockchain technology in the energy
ACKNOWLEDGMENT sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities,’’ Renew.
The authors are grateful to Prof. Q. S. Meng and Sustain Energy Rev., vol. 100, pp. 143–174, Feb. 2019.
[20] Z. H. Li, J. P. Su, and A. J. Jin, ‘‘Perspectives on published energy
Prof. J. L. Yuan for the discussions and special support. sources and smart energy supplies,’’ Adv. Mater. Lett., vol. 12, no. 3, 2021,
Art. no. 21031607.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS [21] R. L. Arantegui and A. Jäger-Waldau, ‘‘Photovoltaics and wind status in
Conceived the plan: A. J. Jin and Zhihao Li. Investigation: the European Union after the Paris Agreement,’’ Renew. Sustain. Energy
Jiapeng Su, Zhihao Li, and A. J. Jin. Data analysis: Jiapeng Rev., vol. 81, pp. 2460–2471, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.052.
[22] A. Shivakumar, A. Dobbins, U. Fahl, and A. Singh, ‘‘Drivers of
Su, Zhihao Li, and A. J. Jin. Wrote the paper: Jiapeng Su, renewable energy deployment in the EU: An analysis of past trends and
Zhihao Li, and A. J. Jin. The authors have no competing projections,’’ Energy Strategy Rev., vol. 26, Nov. 2019, Art. no. 100402,
financial interests. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2019.100402.
[23] A. Buttler, F. Dinkel, S. Franz, and H. Spliethoff, ‘‘Variability of wind and
solar power—An assessment of the current situation in the European Union
REFERENCES based on the year 2014,’’ Energy, vol. 106, pp. 147–161, Jul. 2016, doi:
[1] J. William, C. Wolf, T. M. Newsome, P. Barnard, and W. Moomaw, 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.041.
‘‘The climate emergency: 2020 in review,’’ Sci. Amer., vol. 324, no. 1, [24] A. Couto and A. Estanqueiro, ‘‘Exploring wind and solar PV generation
pp. 1–3, Jan. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.scientificamerican. complementarity to meet electricity demand,’’ Energies, vol. 13, no. 16,
com/article/the-climate-emergency-2020-in-review/ p. 4132, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13164132.
[2] European Commission. (2015). Over 190 Member States Have Signed [25] X. F. Yang, J. Su, and Z. P. Lu, ‘‘Overview on micro-grid technology,’’
Onto the Paris Agreement. Climate Action. [Online]. Available: https: Proc. CSEE, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 57–70, 2014.
//ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/international/negotiations/paris_en [26] A. Pratt, ‘‘Addressing challenges for single microgrids and networked
[3] T. Supasa, S.-S. Hsiau, S.-M. Lin, W. Wongsapai, K.-F. Chang, and microgrids at large scales,’’ NREL, Golden, CO, USA, IEEE
J.-C. Wu, ‘‘Sustainable energy and CO2 reduction policy in thailand: GreenTech. 7, Apr. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nrel.
An input–output approach from production- and consumption-based gov/docs/fy21osti/79638.pdf
perspectives,’’ Energy Sustain. Develop., vol. 41, pp. 36–48, Dec. 2017. [27] R. Wang, Q. Sun, W. Hu, Y. Li, D. Ma, and P. Wang, ‘‘SoC-based droop
[4] W. W. Clark and G. Kooke, The Green Revolution of Industry, A. J. Jin, coefficients stability region analysis of the battery for stand-alone supply
Ed. Beijing, China: China Electric Power Press, 2015, pp. 136–141. systems with constant power loads,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 36,
[5] A. J. Jin and W. B. Peng, ‘‘Development partnership of renewable energies no. 7, pp. 7866–7879, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3049241.
technology and smart grid in China,’’ in Sustainable Cities and Commu- [28] L. Zhang and X. Ruan, ‘‘Control schemes for reducing second harmonic
nities Design Handbook, vol. 6, 2nd ed., W. W. Clark, Ed. CA, USA: current in two-stage single-phase converter: An overview from DC-bus
Butterworth-Heinemann, 2018, pp. 111–128. [Online]. Available: https:// port-impedance characteristics,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 34,
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128139646000069 no. 10, pp. 10341–10358, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2894647.
[6] Z. Li, K. W. A. Chee, Z. Yang, J. Su, J. Zhao, and A. J. Jin, ‘‘Review of [29] L. Zhang, S. Ji, S. Gu, X. Huang, J. E. Palmer, W. Giewont, F. F. Wang,
an emerging solar energy system: The perovskite solar cells and energy and L. M. Tolbert, ‘‘Design considerations for high-voltage insulated gate
storages,’’ Adv. Mater. Lett., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1–8, May 2020. drive power supply for 10-kV SiC MOSFET applied in medium-voltage
[7] Y. Q. Zhao, ‘‘Wind turbine principle and wind power generation converter,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 5712–5724,
technology,’’ Sci. Technol. Inf., vol. 13, no. 25, pp. 25–26, 2015. Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2020.3000131.
[8] NASA. Scientific Consensus: Earth’s Climate is Warming. Accessed: [30] F. Jamil, N. Iqbal, S. Ahmad, and D. Kim, ‘‘Peer-to-peer energy
2021. [Online]. Available: https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ trading mechanism based on blockchain and machine learning for
[9] Climate Policy Initiative. Cap and Trade in Practice: Barriers and sustainable electrical power supply in smart grid,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 9,
Opportunities for Industrial Emissions Reductions in California. pp. 39193–39217, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3060457.
Accessed: Jul. 1, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.climatepolicy [31] Z. Li, S. Bahramirad, A. Paaso, M. Yan, and M. Shahidehpour,
initiative.org/publication/cap-and-trade-in-practice-barriers-and- ‘‘Blockchain for decentralized transactive energy management system in
opportunities-for-industrial-emissions-reductions-in-california/ networked microgrids,’’ Electr. J., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 58–72, May 2019.
[10] N. Khan, A. Kalair, N. Abas, and A. Haider, ‘‘Review of ocean tidal, wave [32] M. Niu, W. Huang, J. Guo, and L. Su, ‘‘Research on economic operation
and thermal energy technologies,’’ Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 72, of grid-connected microgrid,’’ Power Syst. Technol., vol. 34, no. 11,
no. 10, pp. 590–604, 2017. pp. 38–42, 2010.
[11] Y. Jia, G. Alva, and G. Fang, ‘‘Development and applications of [33] D. K. Zhu, W. H. Zhao, L. Xiong, and T. C. Dou, ‘‘Factors affecting the
photovoltaic–thermal systems: A review,’’ Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., active power output of wind turbines,’’ China Sci. Technol. Expo, vol. 13,
vol. 102, no. 36, pp. 249–265, 2019. pp. 2–24, 2015.
[12] X. Zhou, Q. Liu, C. Jiang, B. Ji, X. L. Ji, Y. Tang, and H.-M. Cheng, [34] A. Florescu, S. Barabas, and T. Dobrescu, ‘‘Research on increasing
‘‘Strategies towards low-cost dual-ion batteries with high performance,’’ the performance of wind power plants for sustainable development,’’
Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed., vol. 132, no. 10, pp. 3802–3832, 2020. Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1266, Feb. 2019.
[35] S. Shi, ‘‘Research on capacity configuration and operation strategy [57] S. Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
of energy storage equipment in wind-solar storage combined power Accessed: 2009. [Online]. Available: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
generation system,’’ M.S. thesis, Dept. Elect. Electron. Eng., North China [58] M. Ali, ‘‘Trust to trust design of a new internet,’’ Ph.D. dissertation,
Electr. Power Univ., Beijing, China, 2014. Dept. Comput. Sci., Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ, USA, 2017.
[36] Q. Alsafasfeh, O. A. Saraereh, I. Khan, and S. Kim, ‘‘Solar PV grid power [Online]. Available: https://dataspace.princeton.edu/bitstream/88435/
flow analysis,’’ Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1–25, 2019. dsp019306t191k/1/Ali_princeton_0181D_12160.pdf
[37] L. Z. Xu, ‘‘Research on several issues of microgrid energy optimal [59] Waves. Review of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms. Accessed: 2021.
management,’’ Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Electr. Eng., Zhejiang Univ., [Online]. Available: https://blog.wavesplatform.com/
Hangzhou, China, 2011. [60] G. Liang, ‘‘Distributed blockchain-based data protection framework for
[38] A. Hahn, R. Singh, C. C. Liu, and S. Chen, ‘‘Smart contract-based campus modern power systems against cyber attacks,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid,
demonstration of decentralized transactive energy auctions,’’ in Proc. IEEE vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3162–3173, Mar. 2018.
Power Energy Soc. Innov. Smart Grid Technol. Conf. (ISGT), Apr. 2017, [61] O. Dahlquist and L. Hagstrom, ‘‘Scaling blockchain for the energy
Art. no. 17315159, doi: 10.1109/ISGT.2017.8086092. sector,’’ M.S. thesis, Dept. Eng. Technol., Univ. Uppsala, Uppsala,
[39] Lo3Energy. Blockchain-Based Microgrid Gives Power to Consumers Sweden, 2017. [Online]. Available: www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.
in New York. Accessed: Mar. 2, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://lo3 jsf?pid=diva2:1118117
energy.com/ [62] A. Jin and Z. Li, ‘‘Energy storage management device, power generation
[40] Y. H. Ma and N. Liu, ‘‘Summary of energy management methods for system and power distribution method based on blockchain technology,’’
user-side microgrid,’’ Power Syst. Protection Control, vol. 45, no. 23, U.S. Patent App. 17 107 610, Nov. 2, 2021.
pp. 158–168, 2017. [63] X. Tai, H. B. Sun, and Q. L. Guo, ‘‘Blockchain-based power transaction
[41] C. S. Wang and P. Li, ‘‘Development and challenges of distributed and congestion management method in the energy internet,’’ Power Grid
generation, microgrid and smart distribution network,’’ Autom. Electr. Technol., vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3630–3638, 2016.
Power Syst., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 10–14 and 23, 2010. [64] Z. Y. Shen, S. J. Chen, and Z. Yan, ‘‘Distributed energy trading
[42] H. Xiao, W. Pei, and L. Kong, ‘‘Multi-time scale coordinated optimal technology based on blockchain,’’ Chin. Soc. Elect. Eng., vol. 41, no. 11,
dispatch of microgrid based on model predictive control,’’ Automat. Electr. pp. 3841–3851, 2021, doi: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.200060.
Power Syst., vol. 40, no. 18, pp. 7–14 and 55, 2016. [65] X, Ouyang, X. Q. Zhu, L. Ye, and J. G. Yao, ‘‘A preliminary study on the
[43] X. L. Meng, H. N. Niu, D. L. Jia, X. X. Zhang, X. Luo, and M. H. Yang, application of blockchain technology in direct power purchase by large
‘‘Real-time energy optimal dispatching method for microgrid based on users,’’ Chin. Soc. Electr. Eng., vol. 37, no. 13, pp. 3737–3745, 2017.
energy storage SoC day-ahead plan,’’ J. Agricult. Eng., vol. 32, no. 8,
pp. 155–161, 2016.
[44] W. Fan, ‘‘User-side microgrid energy management method based on online
optimization,’’ M.S. thesis, Dept. Elect. Electron. Eng., North China Electr.
Power Univ., Beijing, China, 2017.
[45] M. X. Long, ‘‘Research on optimal dispatching of residents’ load in smart
communities considering new energy grid-connected,’’ M.S. thesis, Dept. JIAPENG SU (Member, IEEE) is currently a
Elect. Inf. Eng., Hunan Univ., Changsha, China, 2018. Graduate Student with Ningbo University. He is
[46] Z. Zhang, J. X. Wang, and X. Y. Cao, ‘‘An energy management method experienced in several areas, including distributed
of island microgrid based on load classification and scheduling,’’ Automat. power generation systems, energy storage, and the
Electr. Power Syst., vol. 39, no. 15, pp. 17–23 and 109, 2015. Internet of Things for smart energy applications.
[47] J. J. He, ‘‘Research on carbon emission of photovoltaic generation with life He is focused on the research and development of
cycle assessment,’’ M.S. thesis, Dept. Economy Manage., Nanjing Univ.
clean energies and distributed power systems.
Aeronaut. Astronaut., Nanjing, China, 2017.
[48] J. H. Yu, ‘‘Study on carbon emission and energy consumption in wind farm
operation,’’ M.S. thesis, Dept. Environ. Sci. Eng., Dalian Univ. Technol.,
Dalian, China, 2019.
[49] T. Li, H. M. Zhou, and G. N. Liu, ‘‘Research on electricity market
transaction mode under global energy internet,’’ in Proc. Acad. Annu. Conf.
Electr. Power Market Prof. Committee Chin. Soc. Elect. Eng. Forum Nat.
Electr. Trading Inst. Alliance Forum, Electr. Power Market Prof. Committee
Chin. Soc. Elect. Eng., 2019, p. 7.
[50] M. R. Hamouda, M. E. Nassar, and M. M. A. Salama, ‘‘A novel
ZHIHAO LI is currently pursuing the master’s
energy trading framework using adapted blockchain technology,’’ IEEE degree with Ningbo University. He focuses on
Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2165–2175, May 2021, doi: clean energy generation and utilization and has
10.1109/TSG.2020.3045662. extensive experience in the design and develop-
[51] D. J. Hammerstrom, S. E. Widergren, and C. Irwin, ‘‘Evaluating transactive ment of portable power generation equipment.
systems: Historical and current U.S. DOE research and development He has obtained PMP R certification in profes-
activities,’’ IEEE Electrific. Mag., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 30–36, Dec. 2016, doi: sional project management.
10.1109/MELE.2016.2614182.
[52] R. B. Melton, ‘‘Gridwise transactive energy framework (draft ver-
sion),’’ U.S. Dept. Energy, Richland, WA, USA, Tech. Rep. PNNL-
SA-22946 TE1201000, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.osti.gov/
biblio/1123244
[53] J. Pfeifenberger, K. Spees, J. Chang, M. G. Aydin, W. Graf, P. Cahill,
J. Mashal, and J. I. Pedtke, ‘‘The future of Ontario’s electricity market: A
benefits case assessment of the market renewal project,’’ Brattle Group,
Boston, MA, USA, Tech. Rep., Apr. 2017. [Online]. Available: https:// A. J. JIN (Senior Member, IEEE) is currently a
brattlefiles.blob.core.windows.net/files/5685_benefits-case-assessment- Professor with Ningbo University, China. He has
market-renewal-project-clean-20170420.pdf published over 100 articles, books, and patents
[54] S. Zhou and M. A. Brown, ‘‘Smart meter deployment in europe: A in total. His current research interests include
comparative case study on the impacts of national policy schemes,’’ J. renewable energy areas, such as solar thermal,
Cleaner Prod., vol. 144, pp. 22–32, Feb. 2017.
[55] Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (OFGEM). Transition to Smart
ocean thermal energy conversion, distributed ener-
Meters. Accessed: Dec. 6, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.ofgem. gies, smart grids, energy blockchains, and their
gov.U.K./gas/retail-market/metering/transition-smart-meters commercialization. He is currently focused on
[56] J. Ping, S. J. Chen, N. Zhang, Z. Yan, and L. Z. Yao, ‘‘Distribution network distributed energy resources and renewable energy
decentralized transaction mechanism based on smart contracts,’’ Chin. Soc. generation.
Elect. Eng., vol. 37, no. 13, pp. 3682–3690.