10 1016@j Hydromet 2019 01 008
10 1016@j Hydromet 2019 01 008
10 1016@j Hydromet 2019 01 008
PII: S0304-386X(18)30708-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.01.008
Reference: HYDROM 4982
To appear in: Hydrometallurgy
Received date: 20 September 2018
Revised date: 3 January 2019
Accepted date: 17 January 2019
Please cite this article as: Y. Wang, L. Zeng, G. Zhang, et al., A novel process on separation
of manganese from calcium and magnesium using synergistic solvent extraction system,
Hydrometallurgy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.01.008
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As
a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The
manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before
it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may
be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the
journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
A novel process on separation of manganese from calcium and
magnesium using synergistic solvent extraction system
Yingsong Wang, Li Zeng*, Guiqing, Zhang, Wenjuan Guan, Zhen Sun, Dong Zhang, Jialin Qing
School of Metallurgy and Environment, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China;
Laboratory of Metallurgical Separation Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
PT
RI
Abstract: The synergistic solvent extraction (SSX) system consisting of di-2-ethylhexyl
SC
phosphoric acid (P204) and alkyl-4-pyridinecarboxylate ester (4PC) in sulfonated kerosene was
used to separate manganese from magnesium and calcium and to prepare pure manganese sulfate
NU
solutions with battery grade. In batch tests, over 99.9% of Mn2+ was extracted after a four-stage
MA
counter current extraction using an organic solution consisting of 0.25 mol/L P204 and 0.5 mol/L
4PC in sulfonated kerosene and a feed containing 22 g/L Mn2+, 4 g/L Mg2+ and 0.1g/L Ca2+ with
D
an A/O ratio of 1:6 at 25℃ for 10 min, while extractions of magnesium and calcium were
E
negligible. After scrubbing using 0.025 mol/L H2SO4 at an A/O ratio of 1:8, the loaded organic
PT
solution was stripped using 0.7 mol/L H2SO4 at an A/O ratio of 1:8 to prepare pure manganese
CE
sulfate solutions with battery grade. The results of continuous operation test indicated that the
AC
mass ratios of Ca/Mn and Mg/Mn in strip liquors were below 5.6×10-5 and 2.5×10-4, respectively,
further demonstrating the efficient separation of manganese from magnesium and calcium using
*Corresponding author at: School of Metallurgy and Environment, Central South University, Changsha
410083, China.
Email address: [email protected](L.Zeng).
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1. Introduction
Manganese-based cathode materials have been recognized as one of the most promising cathode
materials for lithium ion batteries due to their abundant resources, good safety and high energy
density. High quality manganese-based cathode materials can only be obtained when high purity
PT
manganese-based materials guaranteed. No matter manganese sulfate for production of ternary
RI
materials or manganese oxides for production of lithium manganate, the preparation of pure
SC
manganese sulphate is priority since it is the most important and basic manganese source material
for the cathode of manganese-based lithium ion battery (Zhang et al., 2014). The contents of
NU
impurities especially magnesium and calcium in battery-grade manganese sulfate have to be
MA
strictly limited (Tan et al., 2014). Therefore, the complete removal of calcium and magnesium is
the key issue in the process of preparing high purity manganese compounds. During the past
D
decade, much research work was conducted to separate manganese from magnesium and calcium
E
in the process of manganese sulfate purification. A number of processes and technologies for the
PT
separation of manganese from calcium and magnesium have been developed and reported.
CE
Basically, there are four methods including crystallization (Helen et al., 2007; Yuan et al., 2000;
AC
Li et al., 2010), electrolysis (Chen et al., 2008), chemical precipitation (Yan et al., 2014; Bao et al.,
2013; Mei et al., 2014) and solvent extraction (Liu et al., 2008; Yang et al. 2014)to separate
Liang et al. (2014) studied two-step leaching of manganese from pyrolusite using sulfuric acid,
resulting in manganese sulfate solution containing low concentrations of magnesium and calcium.
After crystallization at high temperature, pure manganese sulfate solution with magnesium and
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
calcium concentrations both less than 100 μg/g was finally obtained. But this method is not
magnesium and calcium since multiple crystallizations are needed and therefore, resulting in sharp
Zhu et al. (2012 and 2013) applied the method of electrolysis to prepare battery grade
PT
manganese sulfate solution from industrial and feed grade manganese sulfate. Both concentrations
RI
of magnesium and calcium in final products were only below 3 μg/g. However, this method has
SC
some drawbacks of long flow, low efficiency and large energy consumption. In addition, high
concentrations of calcium, magnesium and heavy metal impurities in solutions would result in the
NU
decrease of potential of hydrogen evolution and therefore lower the efficiency of electrolysis and
MA
The method of chemical precipitation of magnesium and calcium as fluoride precipitates is the
D
most common one that has been widely used in industry recently due to easy operation. One
E
problem of this method is difficult filtration of colloidal precipitates of MgF2 and CaF2. Another
PT
easy to be adsorbed in the product or even into lattice of the product, resulting in large excess of
AC
fluorine content in final products. In addition, equipment would be easily corroded if the content
from acid leach solutions since it exhibits advantages of short flow, high efficiency and low
energy consumption (Shen et al., 2008). But it is far away from industrial application because
there is no suitable extractant with high selectivity of manganese over magnesium and calcium.
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
The separation of manganese from alkali metals mainly involves acidic phosphorus extractants
such as 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester (P507), P204 and Cyanex272.
However, P204 and P507 cannot be used to selectively extract manganese from magnesium and
calcium (Dreisinger et al., 1984; Cheng et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2007). Although their
separations can be achieved using Cyanex272, the cost of extractant is too expensive and therefore
PT
uneconomical (Jouni et al., 2011). A possible and promising way to selectively extract target metal
RI
from impurity at low pH is to use synergistic effect of mixed solvent extraction (SSX) system
SC
consisting of two or more commercial extractants. For example, Preston et al. (2010) studied a
SSX system consisting of pyridine carboxylates and carboxylic acid extractants to selectively
NU
extract nickel from acidic solutions, realizing effective separation of nickel from aluminum,
MA
performance on separation of nickel and cobalt from manganese, magnesium and calcium, and
E
have been successfully applied in industrial production. But there is no report on SSX systems for
PT
selective extraction of manganese from magnesium and calcium so far. In this study, a SSX
CE
system consisting of P204 and 4PC was proposed to selectively separate manganese from
AC
2. Experimental
The extractant of 4PC with a purity of 94% was provided by Hunan Hongbang Material
Technology Company. The extractant of P204 with a purity of 95% is purchased from Shanghai
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
LaiYaShi Chemical Company. The commercial sulfonated kerosene was used as diluent. The feed
PT
Solvent extraction and stripping experiments were carried out by mechanically shaking the
RI
organic and aqueous phases in separating funnels at room temperature for a certain time. The
SC
acidity of aqueous solution was adjusted using 18 mol/L H2SO4 or 13 mol/L NH3·H2O and
determined by Hanna HI9125 digital pH meter. To determine the metal extraction distribution
NU
isotherms, the organic system containing 0.25 mol/L P204 and 0.5 mol/L 4PC in sulfonated
MA
kerosene was mixed with the aqueous solution using saturated extraction method by repeating
extraction at an A/O ratio of 1/1 and 25 °C for the same organic solution until saturation. To
D
determine the metal stripping distribution isotherms, stripping tests were conducted using the
E
loaded organic solution and a strip solution of 0.7 mol/L H2SO4 at A/O ratios of 1:1, 1:3, 1:5, 1:10,
PT
The metal concentrations in aqueous phase were determined using Inductively Coupled Plasma
Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES). The metal concentrations in loaded organic phase
were calculated by mass balance. Metal extraction (E), distribution ratio (D) and separation
CF VF CRVR
E 100% (1)
CF VF
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Corg
D (2)
CR
where CF, CR and Corg stand for the metal concentration in feed, raffinate and loaded organic
phase, respectively.
PT
3. Results and discussion
RI
3.1. Effect of organic composition
SC
The pH isotherms of metal extraction with 0.25 mol/L P204 alone and a SSX system consisting
of 0.25 mol/L P204 and 0.5 mol/L 4PC are shown in Fig. 1.
NU
It can be seen from Fig. 1 that the metal extraction sequence was found to be Ca>Mn>Mg
MA
with the P204 system alone. The pH50 difference between manganese and calcium was only 0.39
( ΔpH50(Mn-Ca) =pH50(Mn) -pH50(Ca) =0.39 ), indicating that the P204 system alone cannot be used to
D
effectively separate manganese from calcium. However, after the addition of 4PC into the P204
E
system, the extraction curve for manganese was shifted left to lower pH values
PT
( ΔpH50(Mn) =0.83 )while that for calcium was shifted right to higher pH values ( ΔpH50(Ca) =-0.3 ). The
CE
curve for magnesium maintained almost unchanged. The metal extraction sequence was changed
AC
to Mn>Ca>Mg. The selectivity of manganese and calcium was reversed and the values of
ΔpH50(Ca-Mn) and ΔpH50(Mg-Mn) increases from -0.39 and 0.75 pH units to 0.74 and 1.62 pH units,
correspondingly, indicating that manganese can be selectively extracted over magnesium and
calcium with the synergistic solvent extraction system of P204 and 4PC. The synergistic effect on
manganese could be attributed to the formation of transition metal (Mn) organic complexes with
more stable structure due to exchange of H+ by P204 and coordination by 4PC. And such
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
antagonistic effect on non-transition metals of magnesium and calcium resulted from the
interaction between the acidic (P204) and basic components (4PC) of the extractant mixture which
competes with magnesium and calcium for available P204 required for the formation of the
100
PT
80
RI
Extraction %
60
SC
1.71 2.15 2.45 3.29 Mn(P204+4PC)
2.54 3.33
Mg(P204+4PC)
40 Ca(P204+4PC)
Mn(P204)
NU
Mg(P204)
20
Ca(P204)
MA
0
1 2 3 4 5
Equilibrium pH
D
Fig. 1 pH isotherms of metal extraction with 0.25 mol/L P204 alone and a SSX system consisting of 0.25 mol/L
E
P204 and 0.5 mol/L 4PC at 25°C (Feed: 0.02 mol/L Mn2+, 0.02 mol/L Mg2+, 0.01mol/L Ca2+, 0.25 mol/L Na2SO4)
PT
CE
The effect of P204 concentration ranged from 0 to 0.4 mol/L at a fixed concentration of 1 mol/L
It can be seen from Fig. 2 that the extraction of manganese increased significantly from 12% to
65% with the increase in P204 concentration from 0.1 mol/L to 0.4 mol/L, while the extractions of
Mg and Ca maintained almost stable at less than 5%. It was of interest that the separation
coefficient of manganese over magnesium and calcium increased with the increase in P204
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
concentration from 0 to 0.25 mol/L and then gradually decreased with further increase in P204
concentration, which could be attributed to the more increases in extraction of calcium and
magnesium than that of manganese with the increase in P204 concentration higher than 0.25
mol/L. Therefore, the separation coefficient of Mn/Mg and Mn/Ca reached maximum values of 50
and 28 at a P204 concentration of 0.25 mol/L, respectively. The P204 concentration of 0.25 mol/L
PT
was thus selected as optimum for subsequent experiment.
RI
100 60
Mn
Mg
SC
80 Ca
Separation coefficient β
βMn/Mg
40
Extraction /%
βMn/Ca
NU
60
40
MA
20
20
D
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
E
P204 concentration/(mol·L-1)
PT
Fig. 2 Effect of P204 concentration on metal extraction from sulfuric acid solution by the mixture of P204/4PC in
CE
sulfonated kerosene at 25 ℃. (Feed: 10.4 g/L Mn2+, 4.62 g/L Mg2+, 0.424 g/L Ca2+; A/O=1:1; t=15 min; Shaking
frequency=200 rpm)
AC
The effect of 4PC concentration ranged from 0 to 1 mol/L at a fixed concentration of 0.25
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
50
50
40
Separation coefficient β
40
Extraction /%
30
30
Mn
Mg
20 20
Ca
βMn/Mg
PT
10 βMn/Ca 10
RI
0 0
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00
4PC concentration/(mol·L-1)
SC
Fig. 3 Effect of 4PC concentration on metal extraction from sulfuric acid solution by the mixture of P204/4PC in
NU
sulfonated kerosene at 25℃. (Feed:10.9 g/L Mn2+, 4.85 g/L, Mg2+, 0.35 g/L Ca2+; A/O=1:1; t=15 min; Shaking
frequency=200 rpm)
MA
It can be seen from Fig. 3 that the extraction of manganese gradually increased with the
ED
increase in 4PC concentration, while the extraction of magnesium was almost negligible in the
PT
whole tested range of 4PC concentration. However, the extraction of calcium obviously decreased
CE
from 33% to 2.3% with the increase in 4PC concentration from 0 to 0.25 mol/L. Further increase
in 4PC concentration had little effect on metal extractions when the 4PC concentration reached 0.5
AC
mol/L. Therefore, the 4PC concentration of 0.5mol/L was selected as optimum for subsequent
experiment.
The equilibrium pH was controlled by saponification of extractant using ammonia. The reason
on selection of ammonia as saponifier is to avoid introduction of any other impurities. The effect
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
70 50
Mn
Mg
60
Ca
40
βMn/Mg
Separation coefficient β
50
βMn/Ca
Extraction %
PT
30
40
30
RI
20
20
SC
10
10 NU
0 0
0 2 4 6
Equilibrium pH
MA
Fig. 4 Effect of equilibrium pH on metal extraction from sulfuric acid solutions with 0.25 mol/L P204 and 0.5
mol/L 4PC in sulfonated kerosene at 25℃. (Feed: 11.5 g/L Mn2+, 5.02 g/L Mg2+, 0.42 g/L Ca2+; A/O=1:1; t=15
D
It can be seen from Fig. 4 that the extraction of manganese increased sharply with the increase
CE
in equilibrium pH, while the extractions of magnesium and calcium were negligible at pH<3.
AC
Further increase in equilibrium pH resulted in slight increases of both magnesium and calcium to
less than 6%. It was of interest that the separation coefficient of manganese over calcium reached
maximum value of 32 at pH 3 and then decreased to 18 with the pH increase to 4. Further increase
in pH resulted in steady recovery of separation coefficient of Mn/Ca. This can be attributed to the
more increases in extraction of calcium and magnesium than that of manganese with the pH
increase from 3 to 4. The SSX system exhibits much higher selectivity of manganese over
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
magnesium than that over calcium during the whole tested pH range (∆𝑝𝐻50(𝑀𝑔−𝑀𝑛) = 1.62 >
experiments.
PT
Fig. 5 (a) shows the effect of equilibrium time on metal extractions. It was found that the
RI
extraction of metals reached equilibrium in 5 min, indicating fast kinetics of extraction. It was also
SC
noted that the extraction of manganese was slightly lower at 1 min than that at equilibrium. This
can be explained that part of co-extracted calcium was crowed out by manganese after 1 min. For
NU
subsequent experiment, the extraction time of 10 min was selected to ensure complete equilibrium.
MA
Fig. 5 (b) shows the effect of temperature on extractions of three metals. As seen, the effect of
temperature on metal extractions was negligible. The temperature of 25℃was thus selected as
D
40
PT
35
30
CE
25
Exration %
Mn
Mg
AC
20
Ca
15
10
0
0 5 10 15 20
Time(min)
(a)
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
40
35
30
25
Exration %
Mn
20 Mg
Ca
15
PT
10
RI
0
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Temperature ℃
SC
(b)
NU
Fig. 5 Effect of time and temperature on metal extraction from sulfuric acid solutions with 0.25 mol/L P204 and
0.5 mol/L 4PC in sulfonated kerosene. (Feed: 11.5 g/L Mn2+, 5.02 g/L Mg2+, 0.42 g/L Ca2+; A/O=1:1; Shaking
MA
frequency=200 rpm)
E D
The manganese extraction distribution isotherm and its McCabe-Thiele diagram with the SSX
CE
system consisting of 0.25mol/L P204 and 0.5mol/L 4PC in sulfonated kerosene and the synthetic
solution containing 22 g/L Mn2+, 4 g/L Mg2+ and 0.1 g/L Ca2+ are shown in Fig.6.
AC
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Mn concentration in organic(g/L)
4
3
1
2 A/O=1/6
PT
1
2
RI
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Mn concentration in raffinate (g/L)
SC
Fig. 6 Manganese extraction distribution isotherm and its McCabe-Thiele diagram with 0.25 mol/L P204 and 0.5
NU
mol/L 4PC in sulfonated kerosene at 25℃. (Feed: 22g/L Mn2+, 4g/L Mg2+, 0.1g/L Ca2+; A/O=1:1; Equilibrium
As can be seen, the saturated extraction capacity of manganese reached 4 g/L with the SSX
E D
system at equilibrium pH of 3. It was also found that three theoretical extraction stages are needed
PT
to extract almost all the manganese at an A/O ratio of 1/6. To verify this, a four-stage counter
CE
current extraction test was conducted at an A/O phase ratio of 1/6 and ambient temperature. The
phase separation was good and finished in 10 mins. The results indicated that more than 99.9% of
AC
manganese was extracted, while the extractions of magnesium and calcium were only 0.3% and
10.8%, respectively, further demonstrating that the SSX system can be used to selectively extract
3.7. Scrubbing
The dilute sulfuric acid was used to scrub loaded organic phase to minimize the co-extraction of
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
calcium and magnesium. The effect of H2SO4 concentration in the range of 0-0.025 mol/L on
scrubbing of metals with a loaded organic solution containing 4.13 g/L Mn2+, 0.0018 g/L Mg2+ and
It can be seen from Fig.7 that the scrubbing of magnesium reached 70% when de-ionized water
was used as scrubbing agent, while the scrubbing of calcium was only less than 7%, indicating
PT
that most of magnesium was entrained into the organic phase during extraction. The scrubbing of
RI
calcium increased from 6.8% to 48% with the increase in H2SO4 concentration from 0 to 0.025
SC
mol/L. The scrubbing of magnesium maintained around 75% in the whole tested range of H2SO4
concentration. But the scrubbing of manganese was only 4.4% even when sulfuric acid
NU
concentration increased to 0.025 mol/L. Further increase in sulfuric acid concentration would
MA
result in increase of scrubbing of manganese. Therefore, the sulfuric acid concentration of 0.025
80
E
70
Mn
PT
Mg
60
Scrubbing rate %
Ca
50
CE
40
30
AC
20
10
0
0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025
H2SO4 concentration (mol/L)
Fig. 7 Effect of H2SO4 concentration on metal scrubbing at 25℃ (A/O=1:8; t=10 min; Shaking frequency=200
rpm).
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
It was observed that phase separation of stripping was difficult when the sulfuric acid
concentration was higher than 1 mol/L, indicating that phase disengagement of stripping was
acidity dependent. In addition, the effect of H2SO4 concentration on manganese stripping indicated
that the stripping of manganese maintained almost stable with further increase in H2SO4
PT
concentration from 0.7 to 1 mol/L. Thus, the stripping tests were conducted using the scrubbed
RI
organic solution and 0.7 mol/L H2SO4 at A/O ratios of 1:1, 1:3, 1:5, 1:10, 1:15 and 1:20,
SC
respectively. The stripping distribution isotherm of manganese and its McCabe–Thiele diagram
are shown in Fig. 8. It was found that four theoretical stripping stages are needed to strip almost
NU
all the manganese at an A/O ratio of 1/8.
MA
35
Mn concentration in strip liquor (g/L)
30
D
25 1
E
20
A/O=1/8
PT
15
10 2
CE
5
3
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
AC
Mn concentration in organic(g/L)
Fig. 8 Manganese stripping isotherm using 0.7 mol/L H2SO4 at 25℃ and its McCabe-Thiele diagram (t=10 min;
To verify this, a four-stage counter current stripping test was conducted with a loaded organic
solution containing 3.92 g/L Mn2+, 0.00045g/L Mg2+ and 0.00093g/L Ca2+ at an A/O ratio of 1/8
and 25 ℃. The results are shown in Table 1. As can be seen, the stripping of manganese reached
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
as high as 99.4%. The concentration of manganese in strip liquors reached 38 g/L, which was 6
g/L higher than that of theoretical value of 32 g/L. This can be attributed to 16% volume loss of
strip liquors.
Table 1 Results of four stages counter current stripping with 0.7 mol/L H2SO4 at 25℃
. (A/O=1/8; t=10 min and
PT
Metal concentrations in strip liquor (g/L) Metal stripping /%
No.
RI
Mn Mg Ca Mn Mg Ca
SC
R8 37.5 0.0013 0.0090 99.1 97.3 97.2
Based on optimum conditions of batch tests, a principle process flowsheet to selectively extract
manganese over calcium and magnesium from sulfuric acid leach solutions using SSX technology
CE
is proposed in Fig. 9 and a continuous operation test conducted to recover manganese from an
AC
authentic acid leach solution containing 42.2 g/L Mn2+, 7.1 g/L Mg2+ and 0.08 g/L Ca2+ with the
SSX system. The SSX process consists of five stages extraction, two stages scrubbing and five
stages of stripping. Since the concentration of manganese in feeds was two times as that in
previous counter current extraction experiment, the SSX system consisting of 0.5 mol/L P204 and
1 mol/L 4PC was used in the test for 72 h. The process was very stable and easy to control. The
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Saponification Scrubbing
[25(v/v) ammonia] (0.025 M H2SO4)
Stripping
(1~2 M H2SO4)
PT
Pure MnSO 4 solution
RI
Fig. 9 Principle process flowsheet for the selective extraction of Mn over Mg and Ca using SSX
SC
Note: the flow of aqueous solution
the flow of organic solution
NU
system
MA
E D
Table 2 Typical result of continuous running test on extraction of Mn with the SSX system
PT
Item Mn Mg Ca
CE
Note: A/O ratio: 1/5(extraction), 1/10(scrubbing) and 1/10(stripping), H2SO4 concentration for scrubbing:
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
0.1mol/L
It can be seen from Table 2 that the extraction of manganese reached 98% with the mass ratios
of Ca/Mn and Mg/Mn in strip liquors below 5.6×10-5 and 2.5×10-4, respectively. It was noted that
the metal concentration in strip liquor A was 2 times higher than those of theoretical value, which
PT
can be attributed to 50% volume loss of strip liquors when 2 mol/L H2SO4 was used as stripping
RI
agent during the first 14 h. To solve this problem of incomplete phase disengagement, the way of
SC
stripping agent addition was changed to 1 mol/L H2SO4 in the first stage of stripping and 0.2V mol
concentrated H2SO4 in every other stage after 14 h operation (V stands for the volume of stripping
NU
agent), resulting in complete and fast phase separation in the next 58 h continuous operation.
MA
5. Conclusion
D
(1) The solvent extraction system of P204 and 4PC shows a synergistic effect on manganese
E
and an antagonistic effect on calcium. The values of ΔpH50(Ca-Mn) and ΔpH50(Ca-Mn) increased from
PT
-0.39 and 0.75 with P204 alone to 0.74 and 1.62 with the SSX system, correspondingly, which
CE
could realize the selective extraction of manganese over magnesium and calcium.
AC
(2) More than 99.9% of Mn2+ was extracted with an A/O ratio of 1:6 at equilibrium pH of 3 in a
four-stage counter current extraction using a SSX system consisting of 0.25mol/L P204 and
0.5mol/L 4PC in kerosene and a synthetic feed containing 22 g/L Mn2+, 4 g/L Mg2+ and 0.01 g/L
Ca2+. After scrubbing using 0.025 mol/L H2SO4, the loaded organic phase was stripped using 0.7
mol/L H2SO4 at an A/O ratio of 1:8 in a four-stage counter current stripping. The concentrations of
manganese, magnesium and calcium in strip liquors were 38 g/L, <0.0015 g/L and <0.01g/L,
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
respectively, resulting in mass ratios of Ca/Mn and Mg/Mn below 5.6×10-5 and 2.5×10-4,
respectively, which could meet the requirement of battery grade manganese sulfate.
(3) The results of continuous operation test on recovery of manganese from acid leach solutions
containing 42.2 g/L Mn2+, 7.1 g/L Mg2+ and 0.08 g/L Ca2+ using the SSX system of 0.5 mol/L
P204 and 1 mol/L 4PC in kerosene demonstrated that the SSX system can be used to completely
PT
separate manganese from magnesium and calcium.
RI
Acknowledgment
SC
NU
The authors are thankful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC51404297)
MA
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
REFERENCES
Bao, X.J., Wang, Z.J., Liu, J.B., Su, Z.F., Tian, S.Y., Zhou, D.B., Wang, H.E., 2013. Exploratory
Research on Deep Removal of Ca (Ⅱ), Mg (Ⅱ) and Fe (Ⅱ) from Industrial Manganese
Cheng, C.Y., 2000 Purification of synthetic laterite leach solution by solvent extraction using
PT
D2EHPA. Hydrometallurgy, 56(3): 369-386.
RI
Cheng, C.Y., 2006. Solvent extraction of nickel and cobalt with synergistic systems consisting of
SC
carboxylic acid and aliphatic hydroxyoxime. Hydrometallurgy, 84(1–2):109-117. 237-248.
Chen, N.X., Liao, Z.W., 2008. The Influence of the Electrolytic Composition on EMM (in
NU
Chinese). China's Manganese Industry, 26(4):5-8.
MA
Chenli, Z., Lian, F., Ma, L., 2016. A novel method to remove Ca2+ and Mg2+ impurities from
Automation.
E
Dreisinger, D,B., Cooper, W.C., 1984. The solvent extraction separation of cobalt and nickel using
PT
Helen, E.F., Geoffrey A.L., Erica J.W., 2007. Solubility of calcium sulfate salts in acidic
AC
Jouni, P., Erkki, P., 2011. Effect of temperature on Mn–Ca selectivity with organophosphorus acid
Li, X.H., Ji, D.D., Su H.F., Pan, L.P., Li, J., Li, J., Wen, Y.X., Study on production of manganese
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Liang, M., Luo, C.L., Liu, C.M., Liu, D.Z., Li, G.L., Deng, Y.G., Chen, F.M., Long, H.P., 2014.
The preparation of high purity manganese sulfate from pyrolusite by reduction method,
Liu, H.G., Zhu, G.C., 2008. Study on Removal of Calcium and Magnesium from Leaching
Solution of Manganese Ore by Solvent Extraction (in Chinese). China's Manganese Industry,
PT
(01): 34-37.
RI
Mei, J., Ye, H., Li, F.Z., 2014. A Study of the Preparation of Battery-level Manganese Sulfate (in
SC
Chinese). China's Manganese Industry, 32(02): 20-24.
Preston, J.S., Preez, A.C.D., 2010. Solvent extraction of nickel from acidic solutions using
NU
synergistic mixtures containing pyridinecarboxylate esters. Part 1. Systems based on
MA
66(1): 86-94.
D
Preston, J.S., Preez, A.C.D., 2000. Separation of nickel and calcium by solvent extraction using
E
Shen, Y.F., Xue, W.Y., Niu, W.Y., 2008. Recovery of Co(II) and Ni(II) from hydrochloric acid
CE
18(5):1262-1268.
Tan, L.M., Hu, H.P., Liao, J.M., Wang, C.X., Li, C., 2014. Preparation of High-purity Manganese
Sulfate for Battery by Solvent Extraction (in Chinese). Nonferrous Metals (Extractive
Xing, X.Y., Ning, S.M., 2015. The Research Status and Analysis on Manganese Sulphate Solution
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Yan, S., Qiu, Y.R., 2014. Preparation of electronic grade manganese sulfate from leaching solution
24(11):3716-3721.
Yang, W.J., Zhu, L.J., Qu, X.J., 2014. Study on removal of calcium and magnesium ions from
PT
Science), 41(12):83-88.
RI
Yuan, M.L., Qiu, G.Z., 2000. Study on the removing of MgSO4 from MnSO4 solution based on the
SC
aqueous system phase diagram (in Chinese). Journal of Central South University of
Technology, (03):212-214.
NU
Zhang, H., Zhao, K., Chen, F.Y., Jiang. Q., 2014. Application Prospect and Development of High
MA
Pure Manganese Sulfate Monohydrate in Battery Level (in Chinese). China's Manganese
Zhang, W.S., Cheng, C.Y., 2007. Manganese metallurgy review. Part II: Manganese separation and
E
Zhu, Y.W., Zhang, T.Q., Huang, C.Y., Mu, J.J., Sang, K.X., Ma, L.B., Chen, Y.Z., 2013. A novel
CE
method to prepare manganese sulfate solution with ultra low concentration of calcium and
AC
Zhu, Y.W., Zhang, T.Q., Qu, Z.S., Zheng, X.Y., Huang, C.Y., Mu, J.J., 2012. A novel method to
prepare manganese sulfate solution with ultra low concentration of calcium and magnesium.
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights
The SSX system consisting of P204 and 4PC exhibited a synergistic effect on
More than 99.9% of Mn2+ was selectively extracted over Ca2+ and Mg2+ at
PT
system.
RI
The mass ratios of Ca/Mn and Mg/Mn in strip liquors were 5.6×10-5 and 2.5×10-4,
SC
respectively.
NU
MA
E D
PT
CE
AC
23
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9