BUA4002 - Assignment - Part - 3
BUA4002 - Assignment - Part - 3
ESS SIMULATION
21659370
aider Jaffri
instructions relating to Part 3.
Show black on Y INTRODUCTION TO ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE
white to print?
It is now 3 years later - the middle of January 2027. Your client has provided you with a complete set of financial statements for the last three years (shown below), and has asked for help in analysing and
interpreting the firm's performance. The client has heard about various financial ratios which can be used aid in the analysis of financial statements, but doesn't know now to calculate them or interpret them,
and has you to help with this.
Before you start analysing the firm's financial statements, you will need to obtain industry averages for each of the standard financial statement ratios. These are provided in the Part A tab.
Your task: 1. Calculate the 16 ratios shown in the Part 3 (A) tab, for each of the last three years.
2. Analyse the firm's performance over the last 3 years, by completing the Part 3 (B) tab. Identify any strengths or weaknesses, in terms of positive or negative trends.
3. Analyse the firm's performance in comparison to industry averages for each of the ratios, by completing the Part 3 (C) tab, identifying any apparent strengths or weaknesses.
4. Summarise the firm's performance in terms of profitability, efficiency, liquidity, leverage and potential for investment, by completing the Part 3 (D) tab.
5. Briefly explain to the client any possible problems with your analysis that the client should bear in mind, by completing the Part 3 (E) tab.
Profitability Ratios
1. Return on Equity
2. Return on Capital Employed
3. Operating Profit Margin
4. Gross Profit Margin
Efficiency Ratios
5. Average Inventory Turnover Period
6. Average Settlement Period for Accounts Receivable
7. Average Settlement Period for Accounts Payable
8. Sales Revenue to Capital Employed
Liquidity Ratios
9. Current Ratio
10. Acid Test Ratio
Leverage Ratios
11. Gearing Ratio
12. Interest Cover Ratio
Investment Ratios
13. Dividend Payout Ratio
14. Dividend Yield
15. Earnings Per Share
16. P/E Ratio*
*(use the EPS rounded to the nearest cent in doing this calculation)
INTRODUCTION TO ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE
23.1%
13.6%
15.1%
47.9%
76.7
30.3
33.5
86.6%
4.84
2.90
56.1%
5.41
40.4%
4.00%
$0.29
11.3
INTRODUC
PART 3: FINAN
Part B
Analyse the firm's performance over the last 3 years. You should pay attention to all 16 ratios shown in Part A. Id
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
Over the past three years, the firm's profitability ratios reflect a somewhat mixed performance. The Return on Equ
This suggests a certain level of stability in the firm's capacity to utilize equity capital effectively. In contrast, the Re
improvement in the firm's efficiency in utilizing capital to generate profits, which can be seen as a strength. Howev
2025. These fluctuations might indicate some challenges in maintaining consistent control over operating costs. O
a significant strength in the firm's pricing power and ability to manage core operational costs. In summary, the com
operating profit margins for more consistent profitability.
EFFICIENCY RATIOS
Analyzing the Efficiency Ratios of the firm over the past three years reveals both strengths and areas of concern. T
77.2 days in 2023 to 95.4 days in 2025. This suggests a potential weakness in managing inventory efficiently and m
from 15.8 days in 2023 to 10.5 days in 2025, indicating a notable strength in the firm's ability to collect payments f
Payables increased from 46.2 days in 2023 to 74.4 days in 2025, indicating that the company is taking longer to pa
Employed Ratio, which measures the efficiency of using capital to generate sales, demonstrates a positive trend, in
capital employed, which is a strength and indicates effective capital utilization. In summary, the firm shows streng
and the extended settlement period for trade payables raise concerns about operational efficiency and supplier re
LIQUIDITY RATIOS
Analyzing the Liquidity Ratios of the firm over the past three years reveals a relatively stable and strong position. T
from 2.44 in 2023 to 2.41 in 2025. This suggests that the company has maintained a healthy buffer of current asse
company's ability to meet short-term obligations without relying on inventory. This ratio improved from 1.73 in 20
do so without overreliance on inventory, enhancing its liquidity position. Overall, the company demonstrates a str
obligations. This is a positive sign, as it suggests the firm's ability to meet its financial commitments without relying
manage its liquidity carefully, especially in periods of economic uncertainty or rapid growth, to ensure ongoing fin
LEVERAGE RATIOS
Analyzing the Leverage Ratios of the firm over the last three years highlights a positive trend in managing leverage
62.7% in 2025. This reduction indicates a positive trend in the firm's efforts to lower its reliance on debt for financ
firm's ability to cover its interest payments with operating profits, has demonstrated steady improvement, increas
stability. In summary, the company's leverage ratios show a clear strength in managing debt and financial risk, as r
expenses, reducing the risk of financial distress. These trends indicate that the firm has been successful in optimizi
company's ability to capitalize on growth opportunities, and a prudent approach to debt management is advisable
INVESTMENT RATIOS
Analyzing the Investment Ratios for the firm over the last three years reveals a mix of strengths and areas for cons
larger portion of its earnings for reinvestment, which is generally considered a positive trend for growth. However
from 3.38% to 3.70%, indicating that the company offers a consistent dividend yield to its investors, although it slig
profitability. The Price/Earnings (P/E) Ratio, a measure of investor sentiment, showed a consistent decline, decrea
summary, the firm's investment ratios indicate a focus on reinvestment, as evidenced by the decreasing Dividend
dividends. The declining P/E ratio reflects improved investor sentiment, which may indicate optimism about future
seeking capital appreciation but may not be as appealing to income-oriented investors.
seeking capital appreciation but may not be as appealing to income-oriented investors.
INTRODUCTION TO ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE
fitability ratios reflect a somewhat mixed performance. The Return on Equity (ROE) has remained relatively stable, hovering between 2
the firm's capacity to utilize equity capital effectively. In contrast, the Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) has displayed a positive tren
tilizing capital to generate profits, which can be seen as a strength. However, the operating profit margin experienced some fluctuation
ome challenges in maintaining consistent control over operating costs. On the other hand, the gross profit margin has exhibited a rem
power and ability to manage core operational costs. In summary, the company shows strengths in efficiently managing capital and gen
ent profitability.
m over the past three years reveals both strengths and areas of concern. The Average Inventories Turnover Period, which measures how
his suggests a potential weakness in managing inventory efficiently and might lead to increased carrying costs and liquidity issues. Con
25, indicating a notable strength in the firm's ability to collect payments from customers more quickly. This bodes well for cash flow an
3 to 74.4 days in 2025, indicating that the company is taking longer to pay its suppliers. While this may help preserve cash, it could har
ciency of using capital to generate sales, demonstrates a positive trend, increasing from 95.5% in 2023 to 110.7% in 2025. This suggest
d indicates effective capital utilization. In summary, the firm shows strengths in accelerating the collection of trade receivables and imp
rade payables raise concerns about operational efficiency and supplier relationships. It's crucial for the company to strike a balance be
over the past three years reveals a relatively stable and strong position. The Current Ratio, which assesses the firm's ability to meet sh
uggests that the company has maintained a healthy buffer of current assets to cover its short-term liabilities, indicating strength in liqu
igations without relying on inventory. This ratio improved from 1.73 in 2023 to 1.83 in 2025, which is a positive trend. It indicates that
enhancing its liquidity position. Overall, the company demonstrates a strength in liquidity management with current and quick ratios c
ggests the firm's ability to meet its financial commitments without relying on liquidation of long-term assets or excessive borrowing. H
n periods of economic uncertainty or rapid growth, to ensure ongoing financial stability.
over the last three years highlights a positive trend in managing leverage. The Gearing Ratio, which assesses the proportion of the com
positive trend in the firm's efforts to lower its reliance on debt for financing, which is generally viewed as a strength as it can reduce fi
ts with operating profits, has demonstrated steady improvement, increasing from 1.73 in 2023 to 2.31 in 2025. This indicates the firm'
rage ratios show a clear strength in managing debt and financial risk, as reflected by the declining Gearing Ratio. Additionally, the incr
stress. These trends indicate that the firm has been successful in optimizing its capital structure and improving financial stability. How
opportunities, and a prudent approach to debt management is advisable.
rm over the last three years reveals a mix of strengths and areas for consideration. The Dividend Payout Ratio has consistently decrea
ment, which is generally considered a positive trend for growth. However, this could be seen as a weakness for income-seeking investo
company offers a consistent dividend yield to its investors, although it slightly decreased. The Earnings per Share (EPS) increased over
tio, a measure of investor sentiment, showed a consistent decline, decreasing from 8.4 in 2023 to 7.7 in 2025. This could indicate a pos
dicate a focus on reinvestment, as evidenced by the decreasing Dividend Payout Ratio and an improving EPS. The relatively stable Divid
improved investor sentiment, which may indicate optimism about future earnings potential. However, it's essential for investors to co
be as appealing to income-oriented investors.
be as appealing to income-oriented investors.
INTRODUC
PART 3: FINAN
Part C
Analyse the firm's performance in comparison to industry averages for each of the ratios. Identify any strengths o
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
Comparing the firm's Profitability Ratios to industry averages provides valuable insights into its relative strengths a
showing a slight edge at 24.7% compared to the industry's 23.1%. This indicates the company's ability to generate
the industry average, reaching 15.5% in 2025 compared to the industry's 13.6%. This demonstrates that the firm e
industry average. While it showed improvement in 2025, with a 14.0% margin compared to the industry's 15.1%, t
substantial lead in 2025, reaching 68.5% compared to the industry's 47.9%. This points to a significant strength in
the industry. The robust Gross Profit Margin also underscores a pricing and cost advantage. However, the Operatin
competitive position, but there's potential for further optimization in operational efficiency to align more closely w
EFFICIENCY RATIOS
Analyzing the firm's Efficiency Ratios in comparison to industry averages sheds light on areas of strength and poten
days in 2025 compared to the industry's 76.7 days. This indicates that the company might be less efficient in sellin
Settlement Period for Trade Receivables demonstrates a significant strength for the firm, with 10.5 days in 2025 co
strong cash flow management. Conversely, the Average Settlement Period for Trade Payables has consistently bee
potentially strain relationships with suppliers. The Sales Revenue to Capital Employed Ratio indicates a strength, w
efficient use of capital to generate sales revenue. In summary, the firm excels in swiftly collecting trade receivable
be areas for potential improvement to enhance working capital efficiency and competitiveness. Overall, it's crucia
LIQUIDITY RATIOS
Analyzing the firm's Liquidity Ratios in comparison to industry averages reveals a picture of relative strength and s
lower than the industry average of 4.84, they are indicative of a company with a healthy ability to cover short-term
exhibited a consistent upward trend. In 2025, the firm achieved an Acid Test Ratio of 1.83, surpassing the industry
term liabilities without relying on inventory liquidation. This suggests a robust liquidity position. In summary, the fi
still indicates a sound ability to meet short-term obligations. The remarkable improvement in the Acid Test Ratio d
assets. These ratios suggest a responsible and well-managed approach to liquidity, positioning the company favora
LEVERAGE RATIOS
Analyzing the firm's Leverage Ratios in comparison to industry averages reveals a mixed picture of relative strengt
remains higher than the industry average of 56.1%. While the reduction is a positive trend, the firm's reliance on d
exhibited a positive trend, increasing from 1.73 in 2023 to 2.31 in 2025. However, it still falls significantly short of t
reflecting a potential weakness in its financial stability. In summary, the firm's Leverage Ratios indicate progress in
risk. The Interest Cover Ratio's improvement is positive but falls far short of industry standards, raising concerns ab
its capacity to cover interest payments to enhance its financial stability and align more closely with industry bench
INVESTMENT RATIOS
Analyzing the firm's Investment Ratios in comparison to industry averages provides insights into its investor attrac
below the industry average of 40.4%, this reduction indicates a positive move toward retaining more earnings for
remaining below the industry average of 4.00%. This could be viewed as a potential weakness for income-oriented
with an EPS of $0.32 in 2025, surpassing the industry average of $0.29. This suggests an improving financial perfor
lower than the industry average of 11.3. While a lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation for inves
demonstrate strength in retaining more earnings for reinvestment and improving EPS, which are positive signs for
possibly reflect more conservative growth expectations. These ratios indicate that the company's investment profi
possibly reflect more conservative growth expectations. These ratios indicate that the company's investment profi
INTRODUCTION TO ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE
o industry averages provides valuable insights into its relative strengths and weaknesses. The Return on Equity (ROE) for the firm has c
d to the industry's 23.1%. This indicates the company's ability to generate higher returns for its shareholders, which can be considered
025 compared to the industry's 13.6%. This demonstrates that the firm effectively utilizes its capital, reflecting a competitive advantag
vement in 2025, with a 14.0% margin compared to the industry's 15.1%, this remains an area of relative weakness. On the other hand,
compared to the industry's 47.9%. This points to a significant strength in the firm's pricing power and cost management. In summary, t
gin also underscores a pricing and cost advantage. However, the Operating Profit Margin remains an area for improvement, as it lags b
al for further optimization in operational efficiency to align more closely with industry standards.
omparison to industry averages sheds light on areas of strength and potential improvement. The Average Inventories Turnover Period
76.7 days. This indicates that the company might be less efficient in selling its inventory, potentially leading to higher carrying costs an
demonstrates a significant strength for the firm, with 10.5 days in 2025 compared to the industry's 30.3 days. This suggests the compa
y, the Average Settlement Period for Trade Payables has consistently been higher than the industry average, reaching 74.4 days in 202
iers. The Sales Revenue to Capital Employed Ratio indicates a strength, with the firm consistently surpassing the industry average. In 2
evenue. In summary, the firm excels in swiftly collecting trade receivables and optimizing the sales-to-capital ratio. However, it lags be
nhance working capital efficiency and competitiveness. Overall, it's crucial to strike a balance between these factors to maintain health
mparison to industry averages reveals a picture of relative strength and stability. The Current Ratio for the firm remained consistent, w
they are indicative of a company with a healthy ability to cover short-term obligations with current assets, suggesting a prudent appro
025, the firm achieved an Acid Test Ratio of 1.83, surpassing the industry average of 2.9. This ratio excludes inventory from current as
ry liquidation. This suggests a robust liquidity position. In summary, the firm's Liquidity Ratios reflect a stable and relatively strong liqu
rt-term obligations. The remarkable improvement in the Acid Test Ratio demonstrates an even more robust liquidity position, highlighti
e and well-managed approach to liquidity, positioning the company favorably within the industry.
mparison to industry averages reveals a mixed picture of relative strengths and potential weaknesses. The Gearing Ratio for the firm h
of 56.1%. While the reduction is a positive trend, the firm's reliance on debt is still relatively high compared to industry standards, ind
m 1.73 in 2023 to 2.31 in 2025. However, it still falls significantly short of the industry average of 5.41. This suggests that the company
ncial stability. In summary, the firm's Leverage Ratios indicate progress in reducing its reliance on debt, which is a strength. However, t
ent is positive but falls far short of industry standards, raising concerns about the firm's ability to comfortably meet interest obligation
o enhance its financial stability and align more closely with industry benchmarks.
comparison to industry averages provides insights into its investor attractiveness and dividend policies. The Dividend Payout Ratio has
s reduction indicates a positive move toward retaining more earnings for reinvestment, which can be seen as a strength for long-term
4.00%. This could be viewed as a potential weakness for income-oriented investors, as the company's dividend yield is slightly less com
the industry average of $0.29. This suggests an improving financial performance and can be considered a strength. The Price/Earnings
While a lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation for investors, it's essential to note that it could also reflect investor se
earnings for reinvestment and improving EPS, which are positive signs for long-term growth. However, the lower dividend yield and P/E
h expectations. These ratios indicate that the company's investment profile is more suited to those seeking capital appreciation and va
h expectations. These ratios indicate that the company's investment profile is more suited to those seeking capital appreciation and va
INTRODUC
PART 3: FINAN
Part D
Summarise the firm's performance in terms of profitability, efficiency, liquidity, leverage and potential for investm
In summary, the firm displays strengths in profitability, liquidity, and a shift toward more prudent dividend policies
industry standards, especially in terms of interest coverage. Overall, it appears to be a company with potential for
INTRODUCTION TO ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE
d relatively strong liquidity positions with current and quick ratios above 1, indicating a healthy ability to cover short-term obligations.
ogress in reducing its reliance on debt (Gearing Ratio), it remains higher than the industry average. The Interest Cover Ratio, while imp
eraging is vital for enhanced financial stability.
t ratio has reduced, indicating a move toward retaining more earnings for reinvestment, which is a strength for growth-oriented inves
/E ratio suggest improving financial performance and a more attractive valuation for investors seeking capital appreciation.
n profitability, liquidity, and a shift toward more prudent dividend policies for growth. However, there are areas for potential improvem
interest coverage. Overall, it appears to be a company with potential for growth but should continue efforts to fine-tune its financial s
INTRODU
PART 3: FINAN
Part E
Briefly explain to the client any possible problems with your analysis that the client should bear in mind. For exam
While the analysis of the firm's financial ratios provides valuable insights, it's essential for the client to be aware of
1. Industry Benchmarking: To fully understand the significance of these ratios, it's crucial to compare them to indu
industry.
2. Economic Conditions: The analysis is based on historical data, and it may not account for rapid changes in the e
performance.
3. Qualitative Factors: Financial ratios don't consider qualitative factors like management quality, competitive adv
4. Timing of Decisions: The client should be cautious not to make significant investment or strategic decisions base
5. Accounting Methods: Differences in accounting methods and practices can affect the interpretation of financial
To obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the company's financial health and prospects, it's advisable to
guidance from financial experts or consultants can provide a more holistic view for making informed decisions.
INTRODUCTION TO ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE
atios provides valuable insights, it's essential for the client to be aware of potential limitations.
stand the significance of these ratios, it's crucial to compare them to industry benchmarks or competitors' performance. What might a
ased on historical data, and it may not account for rapid changes in the economic environment. Economic downturns, unexpected eve
n't consider qualitative factors like management quality, competitive advantages, or innovation. These factors can have a substantial i
be cautious not to make significant investment or strategic decisions based solely on historical ratios. Financial ratios provide a snapsh
counting methods and practices can affect the interpretation of financial ratios. Comparing the ratios across companies or time period
tanding of the company's financial health and prospects, it's advisable to combine ratio analysis with a broader assessment of qualitati
tants can provide a more holistic view for making informed decisions.