Scribd
Upload
47 views2 pages

Review2 Ruberics

The document outlines performance criteria for a second review across three indicators: design solution, progress in simulation and hardware implementation, and significance of results obtained. Criteria are provided for excellent, satisfactory, and needs improvement ratings in each indicator. Suggestions for incorporating panel member suggestions from previous reviews are also included, as well as criteria for evaluating presentations.

Uploaded by

Aarthi E
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
47 views2 pages

Review2 Ruberics

The document outlines performance criteria for a second review across three indicators: design solution, progress in simulation and hardware implementation, and significance of results obtained. Criteria are provided for excellent, satisfactory, and needs improvement ratings in each indicator. Suggestions for incorporating panel member suggestions from previous reviews are also included, as well as criteria for evaluating presentations.

Uploaded by

Aarthi E
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Second Review

Performance Criteria
Indicator Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement
s
Able to implement Able to implement No design is
more than one design introduced
only one design
Design Solution solutions for the
problem defined solution for the and implemented
with a comparative
problem defined
analysis
Able to complete Able to Incomplete in
the simulation complete the
Progress in and hardware minimum of 50 % simulation
simulation and implementation as of the simulation and
hardware per the project and hardware hardware
implementatio schedule implementation implementation as
n provided mentioned as per per the schedule
during review 1 the schedule provided during
provided review 1
during review 1.
Able to provide Able to provide Able to provide
Significance of
results which are m results which are m results which
results
strong significant better significant
obtained
are
insignificant
All suggestions Few No
Incorporatio
provided by the panel
n of
members in suggestions provided suggestions provided
suggestion
the by the guide by the by the panel
suggested by
Previous review previous review members in
the panel
meetings were Meetings were the
members
previous
incorporated incorporated
review
meetingsn were
incorporated
Well designed with Well designed with
Presentation (Slide
good flow and appropriate use of
preparation, Voice
Presentation appropriate use of pictures and graphs,
tone and quality,
pictures and graphs. but uniformity in the
communication) In
Confident delivery slides are absent.
style with clear voice Confidence in
every review
delivery although
voice is not audible
Total Marks (

Rubrics for Second Review

You might also like