Module2 RM
Module2 RM
MODULE 2
Literature Review and Technical Reading, New and Existing Knowledge, Analysis and
Synthesis of Prior Art Bibliographic Databases, Web of Science, Google and Google Scholar,
Effective Search: The Way Forward Introduction to Technical Reading Conceptualizing
Research, Critical and Creative Reading, Taking Notes While Reading, Reading Mathematics
and Algorithms, Reading a Datasheet. Attributions and Citations: Giving Credit Wherever
Due, Citations: Functions and Attributes, Impact of Title and Keywords on Citations,
Knowledge Flow through Citation, Citing Datasets, Styles for Citations, Acknowledgments
and Attributions, What Should Be Acknowledged, Acknowledgments in, Books
Dissertations, Dedication or Acknowledgments.
One can infer that the knowledge that is sought to be produced does not yet exist by
describing what other knowledge already exists and by pointing out that this part is missing
so that what we have is original.
To do this, one again needs the existing knowledge: the context, the significance, the
originality, and the tools.
Often, but not always, the textbooks contain the older established knowledge and the research
papers the newer work. Reading the textbooks on one’s topic provide the established
knowledge and the background to be able to read the newer work usually recorded in the
research papers.
This is not at all the case with a research paper where the goal is normally to present a small
piece of new knowledge, and that new knowledge will not have stood the test of time in the
same way as the knowledge in a textbook would have.
The review process must explain how a research item builds on another one. This is because
useful research should elucidate how and why certain technical development took place, so
that it is easy for the reader to comprehend why the present talk is being undertaken, and a
good literature survey would provide a convincing under to that question.
An effective review of literature ensures a firm foundation for advancing knowledge,
facilitates theoretical growth, eliminates as areas that might be of interest, and opens new
avenues of possible work. An efficient literature review is centred around concepts and not
authors
A good literature survey is typically a two-step process as enumerated below:
(i) Identify the major topics or subtopics or concepts relevant to the subject under consideration
(ii) Place the citation of the relevant source (article/patent/website/data, etc.) in the correct
category of the concept/topic/subtopic (with the help of a , for example).
A comprehensive literature survey should methodically analyze and synthesize quality
archived work, provide a firm foundation to a topic of interest and the choice of suitable
research methodologies, and demonstrate that the proposed work would make a novel
contribution to the overall field of research.
synthesize the collection of articles (integrate them and identify the conclusions that can be
made from the articles as a group).
A literature survey grid of N topics and M sources is shown below to help crystallize the
information in different categories. A researcher should analyse the relevant information
ascertained in Table by undertaking the following steps:
(i) Understanding the hypothesis,
(ii) Understanding the models and the experimental conditions used,
(iii) Making connections,
(iv) Comparing and contrasting the various information, and
(v) Finding out the strong points and the loopholes. It is always good to be suspicious of the
claims made in the sources that have been thoroughly reviewed, especially in the case of tall
claims. If one is amenable
Topic N
Table: The literaturesurvey grid
The goal of literature survey is to bring out something new to work on through the
identification of unsolved issues, determine the problems in the existing models or
experimental designs, and present a novel idea and recommendations.
Here are a few criteria that could help the researcher in the evaluation of the
information under study:
Authority: What are the author’s credentials and affiliation? Who publishes the information?
• Accuracy: Based on what one already knows about the topic or from reading other sources,
does the information seem credible? Does the author cite other sources in a reference list or
bibliography, to support the information presented?
• Scope: Is the source at an appropriate comprehension or research level?
Bibliographic Databases
ROOPESH A R, Ass.prof, CS&E,RIT,Hassan Page 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 21RMI56
―Bibliographic databases‖ refer to ―abstracting and indexing services‖ useful for collecting
citation-related information and possibly abstracts of research articles from scholarly
literature and making them available through search.
A researcher should be able to quickly identify the databases that are of use in the idea or
problem that one wishes to explore. In this section, we present some details about a few of
the popular bibliographic databases most sought after by engineering researchers, but do not
attempt to provide exhaustive details.
A) Web of Science:
One should choose a database based on subject area, date coverage, and publication type.
Interfaces vary between databases, but the search techniques remain essentially the same.
also the identification of the missing links and the challenges in the open problems in the area
under study.
It is mandatory for a Ph.D. scholar to write a synopsis of the topic and submit it to the
doctoral committee for approval. During this stage, the scholar needs to undertake an
extensive literature survey connected with the problem. For this purpose, the archived
journals and published or unpublished bibliographies are the first place to check out. One
source leads to another.
Setup/Modelling, etc. only if one is really interested and wishes to understand exactly
what was done to better understand the meaning of the data and its interpretation.
A researcher will always need to be searching for the relevant literature and keeping up to
date with it. If one is busy with a small project, the advisor might just give a single
important paper to read. But with a larger one, you will be searching for one’s own
literature to read.
Conceptualizing Research
Coming up with a good research objective, conceptualizing the research that meets all of
these requirements is a tough thing to do. It means that one must already be aware of what is
in the literature.
That is, by the time one actually has a good research objective, one is probably already an
expert at the edge of knowledge else it is difficult to say with confidence that one has a good
research objective.
If one is doing research at the Ph.D. level or higher, then conceptualizing the research is
probably something that one needs to do oneself. This is a very tough step because one needs
to know all that literature in the field.
So, when working at the Ph.D. level, one needs to be prepared to become that expert, one
needs to be continually reading the literature so as to bring together the three parts: (i)
significant problem, (ii) the knowledge that will address it, and (iii) a possible way to make
that new knowledge. How these three aspects would come together will be different for every
person doing research and it will be different in every field, but the only way to be that expert
is by immersing oneself in the literature and knowing about what already exists in the field.
An established researcher in any field should be able to immediately point to the landmark
literature that one should read first. Otherwise one would need to spend a lot of time reading
the literature to discover.
As engineers, we like to build things, and that’s good, but the objective of research is to make
knowledge. If one’s research is about building something, one ought to take a step back and
ask if new knowledge is being formulated. Even if what one is building is new and has never
been built before, if it is something that any experienced and competent engineer could have
come up with, one runs the risk of one’s work being labelled obvious and rejected as
research.
ideas were brought together under a novel framework. Obviously, the type of contribution a
paper is actually making can be determined better by having read other papers in the area.
Reading a Datasheet
Researchers in different fields of engineering will need to read certain types of documents.
For example, mechanical and civil engineers would need to read drawings related to
mechanical parts and buildings. Researchers in the field of electronics need to read
datasheets. On occasions, researchers in other fields may also need to incorporate a certain
electronic part in which case careful reading of the datasheet is imperative. The same
principles like initial skimming of the datasheet are required to ascertain whether further
careful reading is needed.
Datasheets are instruction manuals for electronic components, which (hopefully) details what
a component does and how one may use it. Datasheets enable a researcher (or a working
professional) to design a circuit or debug any given circuit with that component. The first
page of the datasheet usually summarizes a part’s function and features, basic specifications,
and usually provides a functional block diagram with the internal functions of the part.
A pin out provides the physical location of a part’s pins, with special mark for pin 1 so that
the part can be correctly plugged into the circuit. Some parts also provide graphs showing
performance versus various criteria (supply voltage, temperature, etc.), and safe region for
reliable operation which should be carefully read and noted by the researcher.
One should be also in the lookout for truth tables which describe what sort of inputs provide
what types of outputs, and also timing diagrams which lay out how and at what speed data is
sent and received from the part. Datasheets usually end with accurate dimensions of the
packages a part is available in. This is useful for printed circuit board (PCB) layout.
When working with a new part, or when deciding which part to use in the research work, it is
recommended to carefully read that part’s datasheet to come up with a bit of shortcut that
may potentially save many hours later on.
As already stated, an engineering researcher will have documents to read which are specific
to the branch of engineering in which one is researching in. However, the objective of the
authors herein has been to use datasheets as an example to state the need to pay attention to
the art of reading such documents.
Citations (references) credit others for their work, while allowing the readers to trace the
source publication if needed. Any portion of someone else’s work or ideas in papers, patents,
or presentations must be used in any new document only by clearly citing the source.
The growth of knowledge in any field of study, especially in technological fields, is primarily
incremental and a researcher invariably and naturally builds upon prior information. There
are well-established means of preventing and spreading knowledge through publication of
patents, papers (conference paper and the peer-reviewed journal paper), or articles, and also
through textbooks and classrooms. While it is true that a research needs to leverage the prior
art in the area of research interest so as to make further development, at the same time it is
important to ensure that credit for that existing knowledge is suitably acknowledged.
When a bibliography of previously published patents or papers is placed in the new works of
a researcher, a connection is established between the new and previous work.
Citations help the readers to verify the quality and importance of the new work and
justification of the findings.
It is a way to tell readers that certain material in the researcher’s present work has come from
another source and as an ethical responsibility; appropriate credit has been given to the
original Materials that can be cited include journal papers, conference proceeding, books,
theses, newspaper articles, websites, or other online resources and personal communication.
Preferably, citations should be given at the end of a sentence or the end of a paragraph as can
be seen even in this particular paragraph. Citation must contain enough details so that readers
can easily find the referenced material author or writer.
A researcher needs to cite each source twice: (i) in-text citation, in the text of the article
exactly where the source is quoted or paraphrased, and (ii) a second time in the references,
typically at the end of the chapter or a book or at the end of a research article
The citation elements differ and so what is to be recorded can differ from one source to
another. It is also important to mention the date the source was published and sometimes also
the particular date it was accessed by the researcher if it is related to web content.
LaTeX, a document preparation system often used by engineering researchers to
automatically format documents that comply with standard formatting needs, is very effective
to track and update citations.
There are three main functions of citation:
(i) Verification function: Authors have a scope for finding intentional or unintentional
distortion of research or misleading statements. Citation offers the readers
a chance to ascertain if the original source is justified or not, and if that assertion is properly
described in the present work .
ii) Acknowledgment function: Researchers primarily receive credit for their work through
citations. Citations play crucial role in promotion of individual researchers and their
continued employment. Many reputed organizations and institutes provide research funding
based on the reputations of the researchers. Citations help all researchers to enhance their
reputation and provide detailed background of the research work.
ii) Documentation function: Citations are also used to document scientific concepts and
historical progress of any particular technology over the years
Authors demonstrate their comprehension skills by identifying, estimating, and incorporating
other’s research work and then create and express their own ideas precisely while
acknowledging ownership of ideas through citation.
Authors should cite sources to indicate significance of the work to the reader. Relevant
citations help authors develop an easily understandable argument and prevent the need to
navigate through work irrelevant to the reader’s interest areas.
the title can increase the chance of finding and reading the article as well as get more
citations.
Keywords represent essential information as well as main content of the article, which are
relevant to the area of research. Search engines, journal, digital libraries, and indexing
services use keywords for categorization of the research topic and to direct the work to the
relevant audience.
If maximum number of allowable keywords is used, then the chance of the article being
found increases and so does the probability of citation count of the article. Usage of new
keywords should be minimal as such keywords may not be well known to the research
community and so may lead to low visibility of the article.
Figure 2.1 shows the relationship between citations, knowledge flow, and elements such as
researchers, papers, jour- nal publications or conferences, and institutions. If paper A is cited
by paper B, then knowledge flows through citation networks across institutions.
Figure shows a relationship between co-authorship and different types of citations. Three
articles (X, Y, and Z) and five references (X1, X2, X3, Y1, and Y2) of article X and Y,
respectively, are considered. A, B, and C are authors of article X, and D, E, F, G, and also A
are authors of article Y. Article Z has two authors H and E. References X1, X2, X3, Y1, and
Y2 have authors (A, P), (H, R), (D), (Q, B, F), and (R), respectively.
Based on co-authorship citation network, references X1 and Y1 are considered self-citation,
reference X3 is a level-1 co-author citation because author of article Y is direct collaborator of
author A, reference X2 is a level-1 co-author network because author A is collaborator of E
who collaborated with H. We conclude that papers which frequently cite collaborators will also
often cite collaborators of collaborators. Collaborations certainly impact citation counts.
Co-authorship network
Citing Datasets
The nature of engineering research has evolved rapidly and now relies heavily on
data to justify claims and provide experimental evidences and so data citations must fetch
proper credit to the creator of the dataset as citations of other objects like research articles.
Ascertaining the ownership of data can be a complicated issue especially with large datasets,
and issues of funding can also make it a difficult matter.
A researcher should obtain necessary permission for using data from a particular source.
Citations related to datasets should include enough information so that a reader could find the
same dataset again in the future, even if the link provided no longer works. It is proper to
include a mixture of general and specific information to enable a reader to be certain that the
search result is the same dataset that was sought.
Examples:
Historical Data, Sotavento (Wind Farm), Corunna, Spain (July 2016): [Accessed:
4 Oct, 2016] Retrieved from http://www.sotaventogalicia.com/en/real-time-data/historical
Author Surname, Author Initial. (Year Published). Title. Publisher, City,Pages Used.
Example:
Wearstler, K., and Bogart, J. (2004). Modern glamour. Regan Books, NY.
Author Credentials / Company Name (Year Published). ‘Title’. http://WebsiteURL (Oct. 10, 2013).
Example:
Example:
Johnston, L. (2014). “How an Inconvenient Truth Expanded The Climate Change Dialogue abd Reignited An Ethical
Purpose in The United States”.1–160.
b) In-text citation for journals or books: The following part is to be placed right after the
reference to the source of the citation assignment
Template
(Author Surname/Website URL Year Published)
Examples:
i. Citation is a very important part of technical writing. (Deb 2016)
ii. Engineers create devices to monitor mountains so that nearby inhab- itants can be warned of impending eruptions.
(Teachengineering.org 2014)
2. IEEE style (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)3 IEEE style is standard for all
IEEE journals and magazines, and is frequently used for papers and articles in the fields of
electrical engineering and computer science. The IEEE style requires endnotes and that
references be cited numerically in the text
Those submitting to an IEEE publication should see guidelines for the specific journal or
magazine and may also refer to the complete IEEE editorial style manual. Some examples of
IEEE styles of citations for different types of sources are enumerated below
Chapter in an edited book
[1] A. Rezi and M. Allam, “Techniques in array processing by means of transformations,” in Control and Dynamic Systems, Vol. 69,
Multidimensional Systems, C. T. Leondes, Ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995, pp. 133–180
Acknowledgments and attributions are also very important in the publications of journal or
conference papers
Whenever possible, author shall give name of persons who may be responsible, even if
nominally, for designs, inventions, writings, or other accomplishments. Given the importance
of work published, authorship is also important. The reward triangle theory shows a
relationship between citations, acknowledgment, and authorship.
In engineering research, acknowledgments are meant for participating techni-cians, students,
funding agency, grant number, institution, or anyone who provide scientific inputs, shared
unpublished results, provided equipment, or participated in discussions.
B).Acknowledgments in Books/Dissertations
A page of acknowledgments is usually included at the beginning of a thesis/ dissertation
immediately following the table of contents.
These acknowledgments are longer than the one or two sentence statements in journal papers
or articles in conference proceedings.
These detailed acknowledgments enable the researcher to thank all those who have
contributed in completion of the research work. Careful thought needs to be given concerning
those whose inputs are to be acknowledged and in what order.
Generally, one should express appreciation in a concise manner and avoid emotive language.
The following are often acknowledged in these types of acknowledgments: main supervisor,
second supervisor, peers in the lab, other academic staff in the department, technical or
support staff in the department, colleagues from other departments, other institutions, or
organizations, former students, family, and friends
Sample Acknowledgement in Thesis: I wish to express my sincere appreciation to my supervisor Prof.
Gang Tao for the useful comments, remarks and encouragement throughout this thesis work.
Furthermore, I wish to express my thanks to Prof. Jacob Hammer for introducing me to the topic and
for the support along the way. Also, I like to thank my peers in the Adaptive Control Lab such as Yu
Liu and Shanshan Li, who have shared their precious time during many lively technical discussions. I
would like to thank my family members who have supported me throughout this journey in many
different ways
Dedication or Acknowledgments?
While acknowledgments are reserved for those who helped out with the book in some way or
another (editing, moral support, etc), a dedication is to whomever the author would like it to
be dedicated to, whether it is the author’s mother, the best friend, the pet dog, or Almighty
God. And yes, it is possible to dedicate something to someone while also mentioning them in
the acknowledgments.
For example, one may dedicate a book to one’s spouse, but acknowledge them for being the
moral support and putting up with when one got very stressed
The acknowledgments in technical books can be sometimes as brief as the ones in journal
articles. The acknowledgment section of a technical report may be a paragraph that is longer
than a journal paper but shorter than dissertations. Generally, the length of the
acknowledgment may have some correlation with the length of the document.