Globalisation

Londonistan
Globalisation
Omar butt
Londonistan Omar Butt 1
Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

Londonistan
Globalisation


Table of Contents
Prologue……………………….5
1. Islam is not extremism…...6
2. Peaceability……………..….10
3. Ghiloo…………………..……32
4. Racism………………..……..36
5. “Original” sin………………38
6. The Islamic civil state…….40
7. Countering extremism……42
8. Internal or international…..45
9. Usa and Practice A
-Introverted and extroverted
Globalisation…………..………51
10.Islam in USA……………….53
11.Naya Pakistan……………..64
12.New hegemony……….......66
13.Praxis……………………….71
14.Net GDP or net debt?…….74
15.Globalisation………………84
16.Pakistan studies……...…..88
17. Is Christianity extremist
and are all christians
extremists?.............................94
Conclusion- Islam……………98
Appendix……………………….99
Diagrams……………………….101

Prologue
Extremism or extremist scapegoating
In London, where people who are 20 to 40% Muslim 1,

go to mosques on Friday are not prepared to call the
old religion of the city, christianity as freaks, however
because they are engaged in a war against us, we
are prepared to swear that they are extremists.
They are extremely against Palestinians since 1948.

They are extremely against Native Americans since
1492. They are extremely against Aborigines in
Australia and New Zealand. They are extremely against
South African coloured peoples and other Africans
such as East Africans and West Africans (during the so-
called transatlantic slave trade). They are extremely
against us as Muslims in the war on terror, this is their
scapegoating.
1
Muslims in London are an estimated 20%, but an estimated 40% in London Borough of Tower Hamlets

1. Islam is not extremism

We think of the term in prevalent use today, of
religious freedom, and may accept that it is a useful
term that deserves both attention and analysis but
before that, is deserving of respect as it may or may not
be accorded in the various societies in the world.
Nevertheless, it is of some utility here, in that some lay
claim to religious freedom and deny it to others, whilst
others even perceive it to be the domain of some and
not of others.
Perhaps this is the central tenet of freedom itself: that it

lies in not perceiving it whereas it is denied wherever it
is denied. I will get into the virtues of freedom and how
this is something for which we must be responsible
later. For now, religious freedom is defined assuming it
is good to have and is in sync with cultures being open
and plurality to some extent. How do we define the loss
of religious freedom? If it is not enough to say freedom
can be the denial of the lack of the same, this may well
help us in defining what religious freedom is.
As a Muslim and a practising Muslim, I believe in the

Islamic faith and it teaches me that historically Islam
promotes religious freedom and expression as it is a
form of freedom of expression which is found in Islam.
I will therefore define the absence of religious freedom
as that found in a society where there is either no
perfect freedom of expression or wherever the religion
has been stifled.
However, this does not lead me to any satisfying

knowledge regarding religious freedom rather it lets me
know that, in fact, anywhere there is extremism in
religion; where the religious drive is split into two and

polarised, is the cause of evil. Whether it is religious

separatism, fundamentalism or any other cause. If
religious terrorism is assumed to derive from this, the
society can root this out by knowing to drive away this
extremism.
The only place where it is clear in social theory or in

the study of civilisations and cultures, that there is a
major bifurcation or polarisation that has caused terror
and war in this way, is not in any faith except it is
found in christianity. In capitalism- communism. In
fact if we go back on ourselves we can see capitalism is
the very definition of the extremism of no perfect
freedom of expression (although Americans, for
example claim to love perfect competition as an
economic theory, they still put sanctions on other
countries they don’t like) that causes war and terrorism
and extends into communism, which is the very
definition of the stifling of religious freedom such as in
re- education camps in China. Capitalism is separatism;
religiously, economically and socially, whereas
communism is fundamentalism, it is derived from
historical materialism.
What has happened is we are told to see China as

Muslims are separatists and Usa as Muslims are
materialists, however this is plainly wrong. In fact the
answer is not that, it is, put simply, that in China people
are materialists and that in Usa they are separatists but
they don’t admit it. The greatest terror, war and
extremism in history is the history of the creation of
America. True, and too that the present greatest threat
to religious freedom is in Chinese detention camps.
These examples along with others (such as the label of
megamurderers) prove that capitalism-communism is
the very definition of extremism, economic extremism
which can inform us of religious freedom as a theory.
When we use a western frame of reference; freedom,

slavery, religion, totalitarianism, freedom of expression,

freedom of worship, it becomes a very convoluted science
which revolves around recourse to itself rather than to ethics
and morality. Here the argument lies that our Muslim countries
have an authoritarian governance when in fact we have a
theocratic or theocentric government. This revolves
around the argument that the authoritarian personality
is evil and that this should be eliminated, and many
wars have been waged upon us of late, by supporters of
this dogma.
In the realisation that Islam is a religion which

promotes pluralism in the world and has encouraged
minorities to flourish; as well as having justice in place
for Muslims, non-Muslims too are dealt with civilly
and respectably, through our system of ideals it comes
through, that obedience to our Lord, creates in us a
peaceable personality and that this can reflect on our
system of government. In fact as a religion, it is only
right to say that any particular religion is mereological,
because assuming it to be bad is not the right of
anyone. This is a similar analysis to our analysis of
religious extremism. Whether we term it fundamentalism
or base it economically; when we analyse religious
extremism, terrorism and so on, it is clear that there is a
hypocrisy there. When we analyse authoritarianism or
totalitarianism, we can see that the word we use is
actually the wrong word, given it was used by
Europeans in what they describe as the “world wars”.
If we assume there are religious freedoms and we can
call out terrorists and extremists, that leads us to say
the original division of catholic and protestant, for
example is a terrorist form but not an extremist one. To
call it extremist we would have to enter into a
theological debate. However capitalism and
communism do yield to the idea of extremism and
terrorism. If we assume there are totalitarian states this
tells us that there are authoritarian personalities and

that the final solution is one of, not extermination of

Jews and/or Christians, but rather the ultimate triumph,
religiously, of Islam over all faiths, because of the
peaceability in this regard.
This is logical that dharma can be analysed and be said

to be a form of peace-loving personality but will it be
seen as the opposite of extremism and terrorism in this
regard? I don’t think so. Will any dharmic faith ever
conceptually antagonise the basic totalitarianism and
authoritarianism at the core? I don’t think so. You see
it’s about doing things economically or not doing
anything to excess. It can be considered right do
behave in moderation and this can apply to religion in
that one should not try to be too lazy nor too religious.
However this is a matter of law to be resolved either
way. Either through military struggle against the
prevalent order or through a slow process of financial
retribution (reparations, and this can be done over
time).
If we expand this analysis, we can take the initial

assumption and instead of, as above finding an
antithesis and then a compromise solution; we can
expand on the initial accusation as much as is possible
and then actually reverse it and see if it’s denial can not
fail to be disproved. So, if Muslims are accused of
being extremist or terrorist; we will argue on favour of
the reverse, that the one’s labelling us as this are
themselves this, especially the ones who have inflicted
such heavy casualties in our civilisation. This in turn
will lead to a conclusion that terror is a non-Muslim
phenomenon. This is similar to the way of jihad, where
we are fighting a jihad ad dafa or defensive jihad. It is
also similar as war and the realisation of war is what
reverses the polarity of the assumptions and
accusations.

2. Peaceability
Religion and reason
There is sometimes a difference between a religious

praxis and a revolutionary praxis, but if we see a
change in the religion as revolutionary precisely
because; Marxism is not the only way to engage
revolution, nor to progress towards global communism.
Faith is belief and belief is what is true on a personal
level for human societies. For our Islamic society, it is
the remembrance of God, from where our souls and
indeed our spirits receive their contentment.
The link between extremism and terrorism is weakly

defined in any society, which, like America and the so-
called allies, stand accused of a generation of
murdering innocent people (since Hiroshima).
The basic question arises, apart from economic
terrorism, if individuals and societies within western
countries can be accused of both extremism and
terrorism and this label cannot be applied to the
country at large, it is tantamount to hypocrisy to level
accusations at completely foreign nation states, of
whom we, in the west, have little right to say anything
of what is going on in their country with regard to their
individuals and society.
What appears to have happened, quite apart from the

obvious fact of gunpoint democracy, not just gunpoint
society; emerging globally, is that the praxis of religion
has shifted from christian to Muslim (see appendix 1 and 3);
through the emergence of globalisation, and that this
trend will continue in the natural passing of time.
A bifurcation of an economically grounded, and

extremist west with a religiously founded rest of the

world, is leaving the world and it’s people open to the
accusation of terrorism. The accusation is rife from
westerners, coupled with threats and insults, however,
given, and forgiving all of the accusations, threats and
insults; the nature of racism, and it’s forefather,
slavery; surely it is preferable to consider the
superiority of the religious and the spiritual over mere
economics, and the purely monetary motive (or for that
matter, a political motive).
The ulterior sides to accusations of Muslims as

terrorists
It is this second split of reality and fiction; from

extremism, causing terrorism, to the split of
materialism and religion, which has created a new
religion praxis in western countries or nation states,
and in our peoples’ societies. Why?
Firstly, the war on terror was justified, though not in all

circles, by a rhetoric of extremism and terrorism,
without any mention of economic terrorism and before
that economic extremism.
Secondly, the relationship between east and west or

even north and south, to one side for a minute; there is
a relationship between extremism and terrorism, and
between religion and reason (really called rationalism)
and all too often the accusers often stand out as the
ones who are to blame for all of this.
The defenders of reason (rationalism), are, in my view,

materialists, and of course, are economically and
religiously, falling in the category of extremist and
should too be legally challenged as the real terrorists.
Lastly, the winning and losing of an imposed war in the
world to a side, the number of casualties, if bore to

witness the depth of the horror or terror of wars; it

should not be difficult to see the terror behind the
global war of terror.
What is clear in a crossfire of accusations, is that there

are both chasms in understanding as well as transactionally
crossed relationships, making both sides angry at each other.
It is also clear who are the parties. We must first define our
frame of reference, to know where we are coming from.
Nevertheless, it is my contention, in all of these wars of
late; the mixed up relationship of extremism and
terrorism is itself part of a larger battle, or should I say,
from the eye, a more hidden agenda, a battle between
religion and reason. Religion representing the higher
forces in synchrony with the world, and reason being
mankind’s soul in his being.
This chapter will take a look at the four

counter-arguments of the accusation of terror and
indeed before that, of extremism:
1. Materialism is the cause of it’s

own extremism and this is
termed economic extremism
2. Materialism is the cause of it’s

own terrorism and this is termed
economic terrorism
3. Muslim sacrifices in the global

war on terror are caused by
non-Muslim extremism or
terrorism.
4. War is worse than terrorism- The

global war on terror is the cause
of it’s own non-Muslim war on
Islam and terror against Islam

5. The conclusion is that terror is

a non-Muslim terror.
This is the nature not of the moment but rather of the

eternity that we live in. if Lincoln had read Wycliffe,
this is the nature of the bible that we were reading.
Wycliffe had written of “government of the people, by
the people and for the people”.
I don’t talk about the bible, about government. I don’t

talk about materialism about the mind and about the
spirit. I talk about the thing about faith in Allah
subhanahu wa ta Ala, because the real progress from
materialism into monotheism is that if we realise that
we need to know of Allah subhanahu wa ta Ala, we
need to have love and respect with what comes from
Allah subhanahu wa ta Ala, and we need to know to
have fear and love for Allah subhanahu wa ta Ala.
This is the best way forward; in the teachings of Allah
subhanahu wa ta Ala, that come with, from and for
Allah subhanahu wa ta Ala, these being Islamic shariah
and so on and so forth.
Present values
It’s a simple mindset saying the monism (singularity),

the monisticism (saying the body can be controlled by
the mind) and the mysticism is all made plain. It’s not
necessarily about bible and government. It is the
problem of dualism and the present government and
present bible. It’s not just mind over matter or spirit
over matter. You need to have knowledge of the scripture,
foreknowledge, to know about prophethood. Without that
you wouldn’t know about God Almighty; by God
Almighty, for God Almighty and from the teaching of
God Almighty. It is crucial that we have faith in God,
for God, with God and from God.

DIAGRAM 1: CENTRIPETAL MEGAFORCES

STUCK IN A VICIOUS CIRCLE
Urdu
As Pakistanis, our national language, Urdu and our

speakers, in our mind, our mother tongue is spoken to
large and small because we differentiate in this language.
In education, for small children learning Urdu
or older children in Urdu medium, they receive
education in Urdu language.
The real thing is that in the enlightened future of the

sub-continent where English is spoken more in the subcontinent
than on the British Isles, in our minds. Seeing
this in our age in the sub-continent, we can’t say it is
the result of some dependency economics, the result of
foreign interference. We have to admit to this reality,
like America, where there is overproduction, more
economic development and people are invariably

overweight. We do have to admit these are in reality

very bad things and we have been looking at them as
they are very good. We do have to admit to this ourselves,
with our desires and wishes, to this example of
overdevelopment, and our developing economies see
this and get happy. We should be like this we think, we
look up to this and set ourselves about becoming like
this, to become dependent to this.
This is wrong, we must see the real progress and

abandon this in favour of not having dependency but
independency here, not having overdevelopment but
equal development in the world. We should see we
need to destroy the American economic model to
abandon living a life of excess and dependency, and to
do this we need to leave poverty, debt and become a
developing and progressing country with an enlightened
future.
The sourcing of the first world through the outsourcing

of a middle class to the lesser developed but greater
populated countries is beginning to deal a jaw-breaking
blow to dependency and it’s theory. Anti-materialism
has been written in through supervision and religious
and biblical levels of religious consciousness. It is no
longer a matter of investment and innovation to drive
resourcing and material resourcing and resource-driving
business towards a simpler model. Now, core
business practice of the modern or postmodern world is
both aware of it’s periphery and actually serves it in
reciprocation to it’s service and wealth-driving.
It does this by an awareness of the limitations of

mercantilism and an expansion into international-
ism, also globalisation.
Extremism

Materialism is the cause of it’s own extremism and this

is termed economic extremism
Non-Muslim views of matter, worldly striving and the

reason for life are to take priority in this section over
the Islamic theories behind creation (in this case the
theory of evolution), economics (in this case, conven-
tional or western economics), and metaphysical
theories (or in the case of materialist dogma, the lack
thereof).
This is because materialism is only a philosophy

without any centre, balance, reality, peace or
remembrance of God.
Goods, services and resources
Goods are not necessarily good but we believe they

are, in a capitalist society. Our superiority over other
culture, we are told is our ability to create and utilise
superior quality of goods.
However, a future can be envisioned where the

supervision of the good by the first world and it’s
resourcing by the second and third worlds will see a
role reversal. By this I mean the countries who are
servicing the wealth, through their industry, investment
and innovation will soon become richer and greater in
economic power than the European countries, who in
turn are seen to become third world soon.
Further to this the primary, secondary and tertiary (by

which I mean charitable or freely given) industry, is
evidenced in the reversal of first, second and third
worlds.
Global present value output

At present and historically, the legacy of dependency

economics and slavery as an economic system has seen
America and Europe lead Asia and the Middle East
(and Africa). This is not only a cause of dependency
and slavery but also is measured both in national
wealth and in personal wealth.
These days, this legacy of Christian capitalism and

christian communism is ending and is being replaced
by a new economic world where Islamic (ie. Asian,
African, Middle Eastern and Eastern) countries, flank
America and Europe or are the economic core of the
world; over and on top of, and above of them.
This is seen not only in national and personal wealth

but today, in present wealth of countries. By this is
meant present GDPs. This is similar to incremental
GDPs.
Global dar al Islam
The days we are living in whether it be in East or West,

are spent praying to Allah ta Ala, so the genesis of the
universes is understood as from, by and taught to be of
Allah ta Ala. We pray more in our homes, to God
Almighty, nay as men, our women and children pray
more than non-Muslims in all lands throughout the world.
There are only a few exceptions in countries in South
America and southern Europe.
Further, as an Ummah, we Muslims, pray more than

any other nation, and are soon to become more in
number than any other. This makes Friday our religious
day, wherever we are and in whatever country we are.
Friday comes after every seven days and we are given
a chance to recathect to our Creator.

DIAGRAM 2: TABDEELI (CHANGE)
So we have distinct GPGDP (Global present output) in

our favour, prayer in our favour 2; but before these we
must have a new economics and a new power must
arise from within ourselves, such that we are leaders
amongst others.
A leader amongst others
In Pakistan, is the potential for the world to gain a new

super dominant economy and power, to redefine
happiness. Pakistan at the moment represents the raw
resource world for investment and innovation to take
2
See appendix 3 -Muslims outnumber C of E votaries in UK

place and infrastructure and superstructure to develop.

It is also, unlike USA, a new world superpower.
Pakistan has the potential to fulfil the miracle cure
growth model of Asian economies of it’s region, by
moving superpower from electrical power to computer
power in the real world today.
It is the mapping of the real world into the cyber world,

the cyber physical reality that is the key to the output
gains and cutting of the food bill of Pakistan, key to the
potential and the fulfilment of that potential. The duty
due to Pakistan on our people is not just a fiscal one in
the form of taxes to be paid, but rather, to work
towards our enlightened future, it is one of economic
work; a growth-generative economics as opposed to an
usurious one.
The isolation of America and it’s materialism is not to

lead to a poorer or a just relatively poorer USA in this
world but it is too, before that, a reparatory economics,
where people in this world believe in compensation for
the wrongs done; and thus a China, manifold richer and
more powerful than USA can emerge in 30 years.
The message to USA is very clear, you cannot use

other continents’ wealth and value to the point where
there is no intrinsic wealth and there is an impassioned
or dispassionate insistence on having your own way in
all international matters. As a person, I believe it is
better to focus on the next life than just this one, so the
Lakhs of minarets every year made by new mosques is
more important to me than the UK’s millions of
illegitimate children a year.
In other words, we must focus on doing well in good

times and as well in bad times. The facts are Pakistan,
India and China, are 10 times US for manpower. Given
china is now battling for equality in personal wealth it

is a progression from US model towards the computer

age that marks today’s economic progress. Economic
development from this is towards the cyber model,
where business information management gives
immeasurable benefits and allow Pakistan and India to
become the new industrial superpower.
The old mathematics of electrical generated power (ie.

the uk and us), is being forsaken in favour of
exponentially growing economies and indeed in just a
couple of decades time; astronomical growth. Indeed, a
cyber fiscal model for giving and not taking is being
made.
The conquest of the west is both military and just

through the natural passing of time. Militarily it is
through defence of the Holy land and too it is naturally
through Islamic jurisprudence of diya or reparations.
Why shouldn't USA be given in reparations along with
the British Isles, the Caribbean Isles, South Africa,
Israel, Australia and New Zealand, to the owners, we
Muslims, given that they were largely invaded and
occupied, now America and allies are officially
recognised as terrorist occupiers across the Muslim
world too (by the Islamic Republic of Iran and most
Muslim individuals if not countries officially)?
Terrorism
Materialism is the cause of it’s own terrorism and this

is termed economic terrorism
In the political left is the extremism of attributing

power to government, so in our society, blaming those
in power for not having work is an example of this.
I say this because everything in the society is regarded

as a given or a fixed asset for the government in power.

It is like the perspective of individualism has been

robbed of it’s existence and replaced, through belief in
norms and customs, right through to the view of the
self as from the government statistics.
A communist society has to go through this process

into a process of individualisation whereby people can
know they are free, willing and able to live their lives
as oneself would live within natural confines. That said
the present desire (ie at the communist stage of
development is that the society will strive to turn an
individual through to a society, a sort of a process of an
induced psychosis, whereby there is no importance
given to anyone but the leader, and everyone else
suffers, whether they are driven to death camps by the
million, or told that they are justified to fight poorer
countries than themselves.
In the political right is the extremism of seeing money

in the hands of individuals, which in a free society is
represented by believing it is morally right that the
government should print money freely. This is because
all of life has been reduced to this superficial benefit or
even a superficial benefactor which is served as a
means to an end.
The present economic system sees the production of

fiat money as it’s goal, indeed this is it’s primary
achievement of late. This and the production of high
volumes of unsecured debt across the spectrum of
income levels in the society.
Payback
This country, UK, like USA has, Islamically, indeed

both have, payback periods. The religion of Islam will
engulf the British Isles, eventually the payback of all
the colonial crimes of plunder will emerge because

Great Britain will become a Muslim majority nation.
This process starts with Industrial revolution from

outside and these combinations of centripetal and
centrifugal forces result in a change of economic
factors leading to a change of religion.
The Bullseye diagrams show first, second and third

worlds or core, sub-periphery and periphery are
changed. This is a form of economic reparations, or
proselytisation into Islam.
DIAGRAM 3: CENTRIFUGAL GIGAFORCES IN A CYCLIC

PATTERN
Pakistan is not one to assume rights at the cost of

others’, it is want to give rights, and the same goes for
Iran, and India and China. These former superpowers
of the world are to rank above in terms of the
monetary, shopkeeper mentality of the world, as
Napolean once described the former British.
The fact is, for fourty years, the economy of the world
has been developed more by China. You cannot lead
purely by charisma, politics or philosophy.

Capitalism-communism has been that way for fourty

years. You cannot say Christian capitalism or Christian
communism is other than from the examples of
religious murder. In 1900 there were just over a billion
people native to the countries of this world, and only
half a billion of the ruling class (Franz Fannon). They
have murdered us by now. They’re all white, France,
Germany, Russia, S. Africa, America, Canada, UK,
making the genocide seven (G7). Fannon does not
mention these things, he says they cause mental illness,
psycho-somatic disorders.
If Adam (PBUH) listened to Satan or the good woman,

surely he had insight into the species, conversely
events will occur with foreknowledge of the murderous
leaders of the genocide seven.
It is a matter of trampling on USA, to march on

American soil. The calendar people use to take more
people to places of worship than any other faith, in
May 2019 (Laylatul Qadr 1440) there were a million
people attending mosque and no news on there being a
million of the Christian schisms this is the Hijri
calendar in which we are in the fourty-first year of the
fifteenth century.
There are a billion people who will worship Islamically

every Friday and there have never been so many in any
faith on earth. This is why Middle Eastern countries are
gigapowers, why India and China are the new gigapowers.
Why Pakistan is the new cyberpower. It will be
a leader amongst others, unlike USA. Which is an
outcast, a reject or a great satan.
Allama Iqbal’s vision was to see a pure universe but we

see with that ideology, with the sub-continent’s four
green flags’ vision, we see that this country ie London

is a part of Pakistan, this town is a nominally or de

facto coloured country with a black or Pak majority.
Muslim sacrifices
Muslim sacrifices in the global war on terror are caused

by non-Muslim extremism or terrorism
Muslims martyred far exceed non-Muslims in the wars of

the GWOT.
Muslim martyrs in wars in foreign countries are in the

millions whereas altogether non-Muslims victims are
only thousands all across the globe.
Human species’ encroachment
With the American constitution dated 1776, we can see

that the European white-coloured man has invaded
America for three centuries already since 1492, causing
an immense holocaust of red Indians.
The human population of that century equals the

present US population, at around 300 million.
However, given all US presidents were in fact megamurderers;
this represents murder of at least the same
amount, around 6 million for each of approximately 50
presidents (all holocausters).
Although this represents for founding fathers ie

pilgrims, the murder of Fifteenth century man, not
present day man; given it is black or coloured folk who
fulfil the canons of the US constitution, and we only
saw a black president quite recently in history, we can
conclude, that everything in the US constitution is an
encroachment of, if not the extinction of the human
species.

If we say the maps of Columbus were the

legitimisation of American colonisation or the present-day
legislation of Islam in the land (through London as
a term for UK and USA combined), then we are on
three human species-worth of extinction. We are on, if
we name ourselves Chuck: Chuck D.
This is because colonialism and imperialism caused

mass famine throughout the world. If we see America,
together with Europe (including Russia and
communism), as the root of gigamurder. See eight
calamities, chapter 14.
Neither the slaves being baptised in Muslim parts of

Africa, Barack Obama, the maps of Muslim seafarers
nor present-day legislators, law-makers or otherwise
historians who equate the future of America with Islam,
are to blame for slavery or colonialism, rather we are
victim and benefactor and emancipator.
It is in this benefactor/emancipator role that a historian

can say that USA is a Muslim country, to some extent,
because the people similarly to praying more in the
week to Allah Almighty, are praying more on a daily
basis to Allah Almighty. Roughly the same number of
Muslims do this as they are Muslims in the US,
whereas only a fifth of all christians do, making a
historian from the future better placed to do this.
Because by the future both these conditions will have
been fulfilled, given only a half of Americans confess
the Christian faith and of these around a fifth
pray on Sundays (ie churchgoers are only 10% of US
population for Muslims to achieve).
That said my contribution to a legislation of Islamic

prayer and it’s sociology Is not well recognised and
neither am I involved in the counting of the death tolls
as a historian, so it is, that my view as to the Islamic

view (in comparative religion) which informs us of the

evil christianity with regards to the murder of the spirit
of man or as they say the son of man as something
which is unwarranted is actually something that I do
know.
If what we Muslims call the holy spirit, they call the

Holy Ghost, something has got to be wrong.
Martyrs of Islam
Professor Olivier Roy comments in his work,

“Jihad and death”, that overwhelming number
of Islamic State are foreign-born, (ie. not born within
the borders of their land).
However, it is not obvious to the reader that such a

thing would be true given the assumption that the
khilafat and the people, ie. the respected people of
those lands are loosely given an applied label,
“terrorist”, albeit the state actors of the aggressive
powers, US and it’s allies aren’t.
The implication that the Professor makes is in fact to

be split into two parts, both to receive further
elaboration and elucidation.
Firstly, given 25% are from outside or are outsiders,

this implies the community is growing or that there is a
worldwide or otherwise-termed international
movement in Islam.
Secondly, if we assume the figure is low as opposed to

high, and that, in fact, given all of Islamic State are
being accused of being outsiders, in one regard, Roy is
admitting Islamic State is spreading to the west as he
Implies it is relevant to foreigners.

The ideas that Professor Roy talks of, that the fighters
are suffering from a sort of “spoilt brat” psychology, is
taken in reverse if we can do so, in order to analyse
further.
Instead of saying 75% of Islamic State are born within

their borders and 25% come from outside, it is possible
to say Islamic State is other than American-created or
defensively-motivated, created by a need to contain
border troubles and minimise war. In this case, there
are two situations. Either the war is civil war, in which
case, Professor Roy is wrong because it is not radicalisation
at root cause, because it is not radical to defend
war civilly; or the war is an imposed war, in which case
Roy is wrong because, the war is in the same lands as
the extra free-dom fighters. This means he/she has
access to extra resources, has motivation, indeed may
be a cause in the exact same regard, as his
“countryfolk”.
For example, if European jihadis are so effective in

Islamic State, according to Roy, their Psychology is not
Islamic but rather insincere (and caused by personal
reasons), then it I because the war is at heart caused by
Europeans in the first instance. As a European, the
fighter is in fact sharing a technological advancement,
and an extra motivational force (maybe wealth or
power-hunger) and an extra reason to fight, given, as I
mentioned the war may be termed a “civil war”, in any
instance. This is not a matter of war at all, rather of the
Inferiority complex of westerners.
The point I am making is that enemies of jihad,

freedom-fighters and liberating forces in Islam, say
youth are attracted to violence, nihilism and such like.
However, are not the western countries already
stalwarts for these concepts and are they not where war
is means and ends, where war is cause and effect?

These are after all the same people who, having started
war in Afghanistan in the 70’s, have fully annihilated
the adult male population of the country (the adult male
population of the preceding decade in which a census
was carried out, the 60’s; in Afghanistan, there were 2
and a half million. Most of these died or will die
natural deaths, but the Russian and American assaults
still killed that many people. The same goes for Iraq,
there were only a million adult males when this began,
now that many have been murdered without a proper
reason and without any judicial process.
The evils of colonialism come to mind, where a

country like Pakistan, by 2050, possibly the third most
populous country in the world, is in fact like a death
count or death toll for Muslim India’s savaging by the
so-called British Raaj. However the Iraqis, Afghanis
and Syrians now too deserve a respect in that they were
not starved to death but rather faced a military assault
from American and European nations.
War is worse than terror
The global war on terror is the cause of it’s own non-

Muslim war on Islam and terror against Islam, quoting
Howard Zinn,
“How can you have a war on terrorism when war itself

is terrorism?”
“War is terrorism ... Terrorism is the willingness to kill

large numbers of people for some presumably good
cause. That’s what terrorists are about.”
“War is terrorism, magnified a hundred times.”
“Since war itself is the most extreme form of terrorism,

a war on terrorism is profoundly self- contradictory.”

The American attorney general, says,
“We’ve had 50 years of assault on Palestinian rights. I

think they are the most terrorized… at least with the
Iraqi people…. They’re the most terrorized people on
earth…and have been for so many years.
Practically every Palestinian lives in constant
harassment, threat of violence, humiliation, it’s been
that way for a long, long time…."
- Former US attorney General Ramsey Clark
If there are false flag wars being waged, perhaps the

umbrella, GWOT, is the mother of all wars, and
therefore a false-flag armageddon. Who knows?
As coloured people in the capital city, we should

acknowledge we have a history of suffering the
consequences of severe economic terrorism (i.e.
famine) and in this century, now historically, we have
terrorism proper i.e. military attack on us and our coreligionists,
In foreign countries.
Indeed the assault on us is a double-edged sword, not

only are we being economically terrorised but the same
enemy are terrorising us, for the first time in human
history using military assault in which millions of
people are being murdered in foreign countries.
This is the only time in history where there has been
military assault on a foreign country leading to millions
of deaths. It is worth noting to say nuclear war, in other
words, has never been so catastrophic as this and
neither has economic war.
Terror is non-Muslim terror
Without any evidence to show malice on the part of

Muslims, let alone Islam, it is possible to lay the basic

blame, on non-Muslim peoples for terrorism. Bible

quotes permitting genocide are the proof of this.
Pak-indiginiety
The indigeneity and nativity of Pak-sub-Continent

people to the British Isles and it’s dominion rests upon
some very important principles:
• Pakistan and India’s membership of commonwealth

and human rights and birth-rights of commoner
faith’s adherents
• As a compensation for colonial crimes committed by
the former British
• Languages spoken here in Britain come from
Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and India
• Use of English language in sub-continent to become
a lot more than so-called “British” history
• Praxis of prayer at places of worship in Britain
• Possible future scholarly dar al Islam
• Failure of system of retribution
• Reliance on reparations
• Global dar al Islam
• UK and USA will function as pivot states
We need to acknowledge that so-called international

community by which is meant UK and USA, try to use
their war of terror, a war against Islam and Muslims to
get back to their territory, psychologically.
They want to paint the picture of the world as to do

with the book of love etc. however the book as it is
today is not preaching love and respect; quite the
opposite, it is a framing of references of enemies.
In spite of war on Islam and our friends,
such as the Chinese; the west, including European
countries will need to learn that their big “boys”, the
enemies of our states, are in fact nothing more than one

pivot state heading for Islam as the state religion, and if

not, the popular religion, at least.
In just a few decades, the commoner religion amongst

Americans and Britons will be Islam and our loyalty
will prove to lie with Islam and Muslim countries. This
is why UK and USA are pivot states, countries who are
heading towards having a Muslim majority population.
Many of the gauge-readings for having a Muslim
country are being fulfilled, such as maximum
worshippers in places of worship and at home, and
other parameters are there too, such as economic
parameters.
Test the waters; Europeans, such as the white-coloured

races, who enslaved and colonised are now part of the
economically submissive countries and have no future
at that, other than to be termed second-best.
A time line can be drawn up and a best-before date

given, for their religion. However, we will not to eat
their rotten food and talk instead of our ascendancy.
This is our territory, psychologically. The future is
ours. We are conquering it. As conquerors, we are the
liberators, liberating UK and USA, inshallah.

3. Ghiloo
If I am concluding the religions other than Islam are
extremist, it is not only because Muslims are not
extremist, rather there is the accusation on christianity
too. When it says in the new testament, jesus says
“render unto Caesar what is caesar’s and render unto
God what is god’s”, this is explained (refuted as having
no place in Islam) to Muslims in Muhammad Asad’s
“Islam at the crossroads”, in the beginning chapter,
“The open road of Islam”, describing the Middle path,
saying “Islam goes the middle way”:
“Islam does not admit the existence of a conflict

between the moral and socio-economic requirements
of our life. Everything is regarded as belonging to
God.”
Muhammad Asad, “Islam at the crossroads”
So, it can be said there is a contradiction between

socio-economic life and man’s moral edifice. Whereas
Christians are taught not to be of this world, Muslims
are told to balance both for the good of this world and
for the hereafter.
This proves both that there is no concept of khilafah

(political reality), nor jihad (in the sense of economic
struggle), in Christianity and that they are extremists.
For this reason, it is no wonder that they are the ones
who level the accusation because there is no real sense
of doing justice in their religion. Neither is there a
concept of social equality, but I have already dealt with
that. In other words, it is both a difference in theology
and in the relevant Prophet of God, that causes this
fundamental problem. Who is fundamentalist, then can

no longer be reduced to a different definition of heaven

or of the hereafter, rather it is, it would seem, a shared
problem or reality.
Just as there is no extremism nor terrorism in Islam, it

is said that in Christianity, there is both. Just as
extremism, or fundamentalism are abstract terms
without definitions, I will need to discuss them as
regards to societies, economics, ideologies, religions,
cultures, racism, injustice, behaviour, preaching, being
liberal and popularity.
As always these days, the media is waging a war,

propaganda war coupled with false military wars (fake
media), saying Muslims are extremists, however, what
we can understand from the term “extremism”, what
does it mean? Other than scholarly extremism, there
are common sense to what could possibly constitute a
good wholesome theory about what makes ideas and
thoughts extremist in their nature.
Is it from an economic point of view (so capitalism-communism)?
Is it ideological angle (so really a difference in understanding)?
Is there a religious definition suited to common sense, a

perspective which can be shared across religions and can
transcend cultures?
Other questions which need to be asked are as

to what creates extremism?
Does racism cause this chasm we call extremism?
Does injustice mean extremism is inevitable inevitable world?
Is extremism defined as going too far in all behavioural

dimensions or just not practising what you preach?

Can extremism be defined as being too liberal and not just too
strict?
Is it frowned upon in the same way as popularism or

majoritarianism?
If christians are called in The Holy Quran as extremists

(in Surah Al Maida, particularly ayat 77), is it that they
tick the boxes pointed out in the questions mentioned?
“Say, "O People of the Scripture, do not exceed limits in your

religion beyond the truth and do not follow the inclinations of a
people who had gone astray before and misled many and have
strayed from the soundness of the way.”"
THQ 5:77
1. Christians are extremists because socio-economically,

they are either capitalists or communists
2. Christians have a limited sense of understanding

because they assume they are kinder than everybody
else
3. Christians believe Jesus as inerrant to the neglect of

Adam and Eve
4. Christians are racist as they say Jews are the chosen

people
5. Christianity is a hugely unjust religion based on the

assumption that God can perish
6. Christians go too far up the wrong path, in all

dimensions
7. Christians are modelled on the idea that nobody can

practice what they preach
8. Christians are extremists because they are sometimes

liberal sometimes strict
9. Christians are extremists because they are popularists

and majoritarianists
10. Christians are extremists because they say they are like
monotheists but this can be disproved.

4. Racism
In a colonised world, in countries such as South Africa,
there is a history of racism which because there is only
a very tiny white minority and they rule over the black
majority, the “apartheid” system has to be consciously
fought against. Institutions and companies need to be
politically “transformed” from the white to the black
power model to realign the country’s people with
principles of justice and equality.
It is not dissimilar to this when the Muslim in the west,

who may or may not be a majority, from one metric to
another; indeed may or may not come from a country
where huge injustice s are being waged against him;
claims legitimation of his or her system of rule or
worship over the old legacy of white nationalism or
otherwise racism.
Before entering the debate on Europe as a Christian or

Muslim continent, I will start looking at the forces
behind the various political attitudes of groups of
people. These groupings could be socio-economically
or religiously grounded. This should keep my ideas
free from bias and self- serving assumptions.
I will make the contention that every political faction

and therefore every political constituency has behind it
an explanation for it’s power. If it is capitalist-communist
it’s ideology is materialism, if it is a religion, we may say
it is racist or not, but generally, whereas socio-economic
groups are termed ideologies and can be materialist or
racist (such as apartheid), religion is seen as a domain of
justice and peace and is therefore based on love and respect.
The religion of Islam too, has therefore a basis in love
and respect of man and woman. It can also be said that
whereas religion is different from ideology in that it is

founded on love and respect and Islam is itself founded

in submission to God, in peace and justice and in the
brief of the supremacy of the word of God.
Other religions from an Islamic perspective may be

deemed too racist as neither is it sensible for the son of
Adam to become a member of a disbelieving faith nor
is he or she permitted to do, as a conscious believer in
righteousness, gratefulness, sin and repentance,
entertain notions of the correctness of such faiths.
A Muslim could not just embrace Judaism and live in
“Israel”. It is unimaginable as is his believing in the
sinful nature of his father (Hazrat Adam (AS)) and the
sinless nature of Isa and becoming a Christian. The
former would entail marriage to a jew, the latter would
mean disowning his parents, for a start.
Islam is different from both ideology and other

religions because ideology or religions en masse, could
be racist, whereas the right way of life should be just
and equitable, full of compassion and mercy. This is
why the great replacement of white genocide, the long
road to transition is coming soon.

5. “Original” sin
As human beings, as men, we are never, ever, subject,
as children of Adam, to original sin. It is original
racism, the sacrifice of God’s statutes with men’s
statues.
Original sin is original sexism, because it precludes

every daughter of Eve from virtue. Original sin is
original racism, because it attempts to deny the
virtuous nature of Prophet Adam (AS), the first prophet
and first human being. It attempts, quite wrongly to lay
the blame of the fall from heaven solely and
unequivocally on his shoulders. It attempts quite
wrongly, to misplace, in terms of phylogeny, who all of
the children of Adam’s father is and does so by
precluding from the children of Adam (AS) , Adam
(AS) from virtue.
This is a double take, it is sexist as it denies the virtue

of Eve, and racist as it denies the virtue of Adam
(PBUHAHP). Indeed, when Lacan talks of “in the
name of the father”, or when the Bible talks of “The
father” they are lying to all of humanity about who our
real father is, who their real father is and who God
Almighty is.
They are prodigal children, not children of God (God

forbid). The tale, or parable of the bastard son applies
to Christians simply because they believe in salvation
in Christ, not in Allah ta Ala. In truth they are
beneficiaries of a faith, pagan in origin and prodigal by
nature, of not a good son but a lying, sinful, wanton
son.
Will they find it in themselves to forgive humanity’s

father, having forgiven Jesus? The faithless, fatherless

pagans are intent on sending their children to mental

asylums where they can live “in the name of the father”
but they haven’t even knowledge of the father they
share with the rest of humanity. Why? Because of the
inherent Israeli racism. The impracticable, uncharitable
peoples are sinning openly as occupiers of the British
Isles, forever Islamic, and haven’t even the wisdom of
being a progeny of Lady Hawwa (AS). Why? Because
of the inherent, natural sexism. Instead they believe in
Israeli superiority and natural selection!
The idea that Eve made Adam (AS) sin, begins in the
world an obscene misogyny, sexism, the idea that
Adam’s sin is still unpardoned is so misguided and
fallacious that it warrants renaming of original sin to,
original racism.
In today’s world, where the devil has man in his web, it

is deemed unfair to say Shaytaan is the originator of
sin, be it sexual exploitation or xenophobia, and
resistance to justice and change. We are here for a
reason, that reason being the evil of the present and
preceding generations where, “in the name of God”,
so-called “Christians” have together annihilated the
human species worth of human beings, many times
over. It is because of humanity’s manifold murder that
even angels supposedly refused prostration to Adam
(AS), no wonder Iblis who was of the jinn didn’t
respect our species’ common ancestral father.

6. The Islamic civil state

Islam and Muslims
A progress is made from democracy to republic and

republic to dar al Islam before the Islamic civil state. It will present
several working models of social development in the world, the
Indian Push, the Chinese Push and the Islamic World Bridge, are
important. Or first to the west instead of India. The Pakistani bridge
model towards Islam is also dominant.
Islamo-judeochristianity or Islamochristianity
As there are no two countries termed Jewish majority

in the world, we look at how many jews as a percent-
age of human beings in total to know how Islam is
being shut out. However at half a percent (30 million
over 7 billion), we can say, as there is no full percentile
of Jews in the world, this is not relevant.
Indeed the Samson option makes us think the end of

the world has come and all people will become
Muslim.
Less Muslim More Muslims
Less Islam DEMOCRACY REPUBLIC
More Islam DAR AL ISLAM ISLAMIC CIVIL STATE
There are states out there such as, China, Bosnia, South Sudan,
Cyprus, Malta, West Bank and Gaza, Rwanda, many of which are
republics but not majority Muslim, and other states which are, such

as Indonesia, Saudia Arabia, Turkey, Iran and Egypt. Instead of

witnessing 4 divisions of national state types, we see three
intermediate forces, the republic, the Dar es Salaam and the
Islamic State. Creating a state, majority and civil government in
Islam:
1. Creating a State
2. Make the most of
3. Forming a government
These models highlight that these processes, which are a blur to

countries like Nigeria and Palestine, for example are causing
Islamophobia in occupied areas, India and Italy, for examples.
This means that some people in the world, Israel, for example, are
still trying at being human, while others are doing their best to be
good Muslims.
It is also, to do with rights and duties, Islam is our right and jihad is
our duty. We musn’t forget jihad and khilafa are bridges too.

7. Countering extremism
Forgiving “extremism”
We were looking at the different reasons why groups of

one type or another call people extremist, why a certain
group should be called extremist, we were looking at
the thing especially if it extended into terrorism, when
you consider that the person called extremist would or
would not be an extremist when you look at it from a
new perspective.
If you do take a new approach to what is extremism,

what is extremism? The media is always telling it’s
one-sided story. You need to research that, you need to
get a vouch for that, you need to get that figure, the
facts checked out. What will happen in that situation,
you will come up with the bigger picture, someone
who has got the idea will come up with the bigger
picture, you need to see the bigger picture. You take it
out of that paradigm. If it is not a question of terrorism,
why is there a need to call someone an extremist? You
take it out of that paradigm. If you’ve got ten reasons
that someone or some group is an extremist, it doesn’t
make sense, because you’ve got ten reasons. It doesn’t
logically parry with the human mind on a rational
level.
To ameliorate or improve the situation, to see the

greater game, there’s a script or a role someone is
following or playing. To see the greater good, that
person has got to get above that. If you’re going to say
there are two extremes, logically, on two ends of a
spectrum; you have got to rise above that. The two
extremes a person is on, are logically and philosophically
the same thing and they can’t be extremists
because then they would be double extremists which

doesn’t make sense. No one can get too obsessed with

the fact of terrorist or extremist when really it is
fundamentalist or fanatic or religious fanatic, extremist
or fundamentalist. It’s not rational given the idea of
free will, even given the religious terrorism. It is not
possible because they would be extremist twice.
If I give you an example and metaphor of a company
which makes a profit and that profit grows every year,
we’ll deal with that. What is creating the value? What
is the process of value creation? This is the question we
are asking and what we’ve got to do. There may be a
way to say there are two people who both accuse each
other of extremism but given free will, you’ve both got
to broaden your horizons as do the persons who see it
as how it is. Broaden your horizons, experience more
of the world and you’ll get over it and deal with it.
If you ask what creates extremism as a social

attribution, it is social scapegoating. Generally a bias
frame of mind is that which is xenophobic and is
fearful of anything different, of anything changing.
You’ve got to broaden your experience to change
anything in the world you live in. That’s what
characterises the idea of that, that there are a couple of
extremes. You’ve got to say that everyone has free will
or religious freedom. It’s not the way things could be or
should be, but how it is, you will deal with. Fill in the
middle portion and let it come to you.
The centripetal force model of the first world and so

on, where the emergent has priority over the developed
world is one, in which India and China are the new
Titans. The third international theory is a where
resources are being provided to make the goods we
use. Even in rich countries, like America, they will
become Muslim worshippers, as rich as Indonesia only.
In thirty years, there’s a great force in the future
creating value by making goods but the same countries

supplying and keeping resources by this centripetal

force rise throughout the world. If you look at it, is a
centrifugal force as India is a Rashtra or China is a
civilisation not a country.
It’s been forty years China has been the biggest

economy in the world in IGDP (PPP), but as an
historian it always has been. Before you had khilafah
the superpower was that, not just a state but our
civilisation and culture. We don’t see the language as
legitimate, if you have a hindu religion, you don’t need
a Hindi language; if you don’t have a Hindi language,
you don’t have a hindu religion.
Looking at the example of the tameness of the antiwar

movement in the west compared to in the time of
Vietnam. The people are a changed people. You may
find this strange. It’s not just the antiwar movement
that has shown this, it is in the peaceable rise of China
too.
For peasants a subsidy will mean a change in what the

farmer will grow in the field, it is a country-wide factor
which influences everybody.

8. Internal or international?
The Muslim English village
The model of the English village, upon which the town

and the city are based is one of a country public house
and a food retailer. Through the power of lobby and
veto this may soon be replaced whereas sometimes
these food and drink establishments combine themselves
in pubs and shops such as newsagents and offlicences,
a time is coming soon when what Europeans
fear in their atheist minds, that a Pakistani, halal meatselling
butchers, an “Indian”, and a “Chinese”, will
come in and set a religious marker, of halal food upon
the climate of secularism. Further, alcohol being strictly
forbidden in Islam, may be reduced in it’s quantity
being sold and consumed in public.
Even Chinese people eat pork, against Islamic dietary

laws, we can say, added to the fact, alcohol and pubs
aren’t disappearing fast, it is now a case of the double
religious marker of the halal food and establishments
which don’t allow pork or alcohol (ie which adhere to
Islamic dietary laws) dominating the old country and
city.
This throws the notion of church vs Mosque into the

equation. Out with church, pub and chippy; in with
Mosque, Indian and Kebab shop seems easy, but to
really do this we need to realise: it is in salah (prayer)
that we, as Muslims can talk to Allah Almighty. nay, it
is in reading The Holy Quran that Allah Almighty can
be said to be talking to us as Muslims.
It is no matter of them/us, that is a very June and July,

very childish. It is a matter of 50% of Britons, of 50%
of worshippers in America by mid-century. Rather it is

a matter of if we bring our culture, the culture of our

grandparents and parents, of having 5 to 10 children,
these dreams will materialise by 2040. However, there
is a such thing as second generation assimilation, and it
is possible, with only 3 to 4 children per family; 2050 is
a realistic target for dar al Islam in UK and a practical
majority throughout America and Europe.
Here there is no ends to justify the means, we are

Muslims, we should be unapologetic for that. We must
present a preparatory version of dar al Islam in UK,
Europe and America before we move to a situation
where, like the white-coloured race invaded America,
the finger is poised on us for our rule and our way of
life.
We discovered America, we made Europe great. The

British Isles is an unexpected object of proselytisation
but let us reap UK, let us reap USA. Let us reap Europe.
What is a religious marker?
What makes a sequence of events in life defined

differently from the articleship of consequence? Reason.
What makes a reality i.e. an event in reality, distinct
from a mere object or relationship? Reason. It is this
same reason or rationality, whilst giving both
consequentialism and articleship, that defines
religiousness, and this is the meaning of the religious
marker.
Briefly stated, it is the hypothesis of the religious

marker, that there is a difference between action in an
ethical standard and by moral standard. These are two
different definitions of eventuality. We start with our
own philosophy, our own self and we use multiple
rationalities i.e. our own personal reason; to connect

either, a sequence of events to the concept of

consequence, or we use our rational thinking to augment
object relations.
Given these two types of logic and reason, we have two

separate discourses; ethical discourse is moral discourse
and it is philosophical. Nevertheless, we must
understand because reason or rationality exists in our
faith, in the hearts of mankind; that logically there is a
religious markership. I will extend the concept of
religious markership in the end, for now suffice it to be
that the dictate of logic, reason and rational thinking is
that we do know ourselves, both philosophically and
linguistically: religiously; before we acquire knowledge
of ethics and revelatory ethics in particular. Others will
call our moral philosophy into question; albeit is being
rephrased as a religious philosophy. Nevertheless we
shall not debate that ethics is not morally and
religiously, philosophical; rather that morality is too
itself both ethical and before it is ethical, it is, in
situations; religious as moral.
Much as though conventional or traditional

philosophical discourse has dissected or bifurcated
consequentialism from the consequentialist; this new
religious philosophy, can override the problems of
having a confusion between ontogeny and ontology; and
resolve the issue of the superiority of morality and
ethics by sticking to the religious marker. A religious
marker, or a philosophy of religious markership can be
further elucidated, as I have pointed out, as a philosophy
of double religious markership, but before that, it can be
explained that the religious philosophy of a religious
marker is simply put: a religious form of rule
consequentialism which I have named as religious
markership. It differs from rule consequentialism or
full-rule consequentialism in that it is engendered
through our religion, and our faith and praxis, Islam.

What does a religion marker entail?
What is a religious marker? What does it entail? How

do we define a marker in the first place is dependent on
how we think as well as the other way round.
Sociologists will say we define ourselves and socially
construct our own moral selves through our relation
with the outside world and a moral marker is simply a
part of a sense of moral awareness or that which will
give impetus to the rise of a sense of moral awareness.
This is deemed as set aside from any certain set of
attributed rules or principles.
A religious marker is much the same to our worlds, our

moral worlds, that is, as empirical knowledge is to the
world, and it has a religious foundation. Religious
markership is the same to the reality we all live in, as
epistemological knowledge is to a child’s tabula rasa.
A religious marker is literally anything that has a
religious content. Any form of signification which is
going to give rise to religiousness or to the attribution
of religiousness. So, an element of tradition has been
added to the theory of empiricism or epistemology,
making it similar to both idealism and pragmatism or
rationalism. Indeed it is reflexive, reflective and rational
as well as relevant to the ideals of pragmatism.
The connection of the religious marker to Islamic

Europe has been noted from the outside by the fact that
it is in fact disconnected in the Muslim world. This is
because the culture is different, so context plays a role.
In this sense, a religious marker is a reconnection or
refinding, as well as a cultural or secular idea and
ideology. Contrary to the idea that we should not
recognise our religious and moral markers, it is my idea
that we must institutionalise, philosophically,
multiculturalism and as well as this, reculturalisation.

That a reculturalising or redacting of our pedagogy and

andragogy will create a new religion and/or hegemony
is not at all relevant to this. I believe in the reculturalisation
and the reality of acculturalisation and
assimilation of our religion. What we all assimilation.
This is not to do with semiology or pragmatics or even

cultural theory, rather it is how we get to benefit from a
view of definite and indefinite. Not self and other in the
world, but consequential articleship. Not object relations
but relational objectivity. Not ideological recognition
but a moral philosophy. Something which all members
of society can consider, no matter what they think.
Social relations can then be simultaneously positivist

and reflective. Without elucidation of the different variations of
markers, I will not be able to say how religious markers
are observed by a community in their world or in their
knowing articleship and the differentiation between
religious markership itself and an example of a
religious marker in practical life:
The main religious marker observed in an English

village is the marketplace. It is the halal sign on
restaurants serving Islamic dietary requirement-fulfilling
needs. These return the religious interpretation to the
public sphere. Whereas the religious markership is seen
as part of the realm of the behaviour of an individual
and not the faith of the masses; the exact opposite could
be said to be true of the religious marker on it’s own.
The religious marker is nonetheless a moral compass
which is based in faith and a reality of people and their
religion.
In Britain, where traditionally it is the place of worship

which has fulfilled this rite i.e. the primary religious
marker, and this is being replaced by a food or a
commercial religious marker; it is noteworthy that there

is a need to recognise the existence, not just of religious

markership, but of a double religious markership.
Whereas first there were the odd church, now exposed
as abusive institutions or establishments, now there are
halal butchers, Indian takeaways and so on (eg. Kebab
shops) which constitute two or more religious
markerships.
This works to override the church and comes to do so

through the observance by the people of the double
religious marker. It is noted that in traditional
philosophy this leads to any sequence of events meaning
an application of the prefix rule-, and terms such as rule
consequentialism. However, there is no need for rule
Islam or Muslim (ie rule religious markership), as this
would differentiate it heavily.
A double religious marker has the potential as a new

phenomenon to be confused as a material fact. However
it is clear that in British cities such as London and
Birmingham, christianism is the old and Islam is the
new religion with it’s own religious markers in the form
of halal seat-selling shops, even if there is no chicken
shop or donor kebab shop, at least there is a halal
butchers and an Indian restaurant or take away.

9. Usa and Practice A

-Introverted and extroverted
globalisation
Asian management model - If x, y and z theories are
out there, what is the Asian practice of management?
Practice management is both ethical and pragmatic in the
way things are done, it is not based on social
methodology, rather it is Divinity’s creation: task-oriented
yet based on first cause; it is wise. Based on
design; it is intelligent. Based on ontology; it is taught.
We do not say it is to take place, in the factory, nor in the
hands-on nor -off, approaches. Rather it is to take place
in Himalayan countries, on the top of a mountain.
It is the best way of getting things done or the best
practice of the way things are got to be done. This is
called Practice A, as in Asian.
I do not deny that with the rest of the world has a job
design, an idea of conventional and traditional
management; however I believe this needs to be informed
by getting to make do with practice management, being
pragmatic. It is not about how we used to do things
around here, it is about how we get to do them the best
way.
We must stop seeing ourselves as the best task manager

or the best individual or socially skilled; and see
ourselves as actors in the way of God. Only in the path of
God Almighty are we no longer infrastructure managers,
but rather we are superstructure managers. We are no
longer structural-functional, we are functional in the
sense we understand function is the key.
We cannot practice management running for the bus, we

need to be at work. Practice management defies the

concept of being at home and of leisure times. It is done
anywhere and everywhere people work and can work.
There is no tactic nor strategy in conventional or
traditional meaning, practice management goes above
and beyond these until all that is left is the fact there is
not only theory, there is only practice. It is not social
pragmatics nor cultural theory nor semiology, it is pure
reason, practical reason and pragmatic.

11. Islam in USA

Angloamerican “model”
Shariah, is Islam’s ethical legal system which itself

accepts One God, a First Cause, a Wise Designer, Allah
Almighty (Exalted be His mention), possessor of Beauty,
Glory and Might. It has been argued elsewhere that in
UK, Islam is first in the list of religions with most votaries
in the country.
The old economics system is rescinding as the world

realises new industrial superpowers. The megasystem is
one of goods and services coming out of third world
resources whereas the gigasystem is where power is
spread from the core; if by rescinding means to draw
away from as opposed to, to move towards or realise.
The future for usa is bleak, it’s religion will subside on it’s
home turf, for no other reason than it has had to borrow
too much; if by subsidence is when an organism sinks
under the pressure.
Live birth rates and total fertility rates
Live birth rates can only tell us about the present system
of reproduction in a country. It is only if we can map live
birth rates over time do we enable ourselves to join the
dots and create the total fertility rates. These can be
mapped for different parts of society i.e. different
communities, and will tell us who has a greater
population in the future.
Assuming we know the population of only two

communities, this is possible mathematically, to add live
births and life span, minus deaths, and add the effect of
fertility rates over time. By simply multiplying up, we can

join the dots and the figures for future population are
calculated, predicted or extrapolated.
Direct extrapolation is a part of social science. The power

of prediction can let us uncover deep political truths with
both profound spiritual importance and deep political
significance.
Demographic and ethnographic curves tell us about how

the principle of equilibration in an environment conserves
a basic amount of the force for good as it is in society. If
one part of society or a community dies away, another
come up to replace it, however, just as the first is lacking
in some good characteristics and has some other bad
aspects needing for adjustment, the latter will too have
part of it seen as inferior and yet have a superior quality
that lets it in.
BASIC U-CURVE

As above, U- curves are either comparing dominant

religion in a country, or they tell us subjectively of the
parts of religion and how religiosity is expressed. This is
because it is outer and inner dualism of the u-curve which
is making for an area of study of religion with social
science. The sociology of religion is by it’s very nature
imbued with deeply dualist ideas, similar to philosophy
and economics.
The basic U-curve above shows where Islam meets

Christianity as USA’s dominant religion this century,
predicted to be 2080 as below.
400
350
300
250 USA ISLAMIC, CHRISTIAN AND TOTAL

200 POPULATIONS
150
100
50
0
2020 2040 2060 2080
CHRIST. ISLAM USA
Gigaforces
There is an imperceptible lodging of things we don’t

understand into and through contemplative
understanding, towards understanding and towards the

brotherhood of Islam, given a lot of people out there have

an idea of an underbelly or underlying economic factors
of how people behave socially.
If you look at the future, America these days will be

isolated for the coming 20 years because, for example
parts of the community, such as the African-americans
are stood as 70 to 80% are having children outside of
wedlock. It changes the meaning of married families if
most of the children are born outside of wedlock.
Eventually most of America will be classed as an

“Indonesia” economy in that sense it is not in the group of
Pakistan, India, China; but rather Indonesia. In this case
we need a new economic management model, in the
sense that there was historically slavery, whereas now a
white coloured worker earns eight fifths of a wage slave
who is part of the majority ethnicity as we call ourselves
coloured people.
We look at Britain thirty years ago, the white British

christian, in the home countries, 90% of the population,
90% of whom went to church. Now, the church-goers are
a minority to the mosque-goers, you look to USA, we
expect the same thing there, over 150 million could come
towards a similar situation, where they are shamed out of
megamurder and catholicism, they start denying the faith
they have followed. They talk of overheating of an
economy or overtrading of an economy yet I talk in terms
of overdeveloped economies, meaning there is
overproduction and overconsumption.
In another thirty years, there will be only twenty million

white British christian, so they halve over a lifetime
whereas in Islam we double. Islam will grow up, we will
not shy from taking over. London Multicultural English as
language cultural and the family as a religious unit is a
way of ameliorating the ills of society and moving towards

integration. This is a very genuine thing we offer to the

problems of this society.
A growth in Pakistan of about 200 million has happened

over Pakistan’s history (from some 30 million in west
Pakistan to nearly 220 million), adding India and China in
we see, a growth of a billion population is in thirty years,
and after twenty years more, another billion.
America will fall to dar al Islam. We have the resources,

we don’t have the goods. Instead of just “sticking to the
knitting” we are going to have to come and “do the
stitching” of the garments, because the increase in
population is going to be in Asia where there is most
overpopulation, or n the Muslim world, where there is the
second most overpopulation. Immigration will mean they
will want to come here, things will level out with this
urbanology.
We have got the resources to make the goods, we need

to be here to do that. We need to get the right level of
global equality. When there is economic inequality in the
world there is war and suffering, compound suffering, a
travesty of justice. The resources need to be provided
and made available from the first world.
Gigapowers
As Pakistanis, we don’t want to be a part of a London, we

want London to be part of us. When we see the rise of
India and China, we see gigapower or cyberpower. USA
or UK is only a mega power superpower. It’s about rights,
our right, America is with a lower league. In thirty years,
indonesia, not all of Asia, but only Indonesia as opposed
to the global economic leader, India, by then.
America will stop not behaving itself and become USA

can only be assumed if we see good in all people. We

can’t oppress our own people, they will come and rise
against this.
Economic equality
Economic equality will not come until the “Divine law of

individual variety” as Allama Asad puts it, in the book,
“Islam at the crossroads”; is respected, and America
ceases to be called out as like a continent, and becomes
a country, USA, or Muslim USA as it should be a Muslim
relative majority by 2080.
What economists in the west are calling endogenous

factors are present in the old version of disrespect of
humanity, but it will take an awareness of exogenous
variables macro-economically, as they are called, to get
us out of the mess that has been created.
War, terror and extremism
As pious Muslims, we assume that the noble Islamic civil

state, operates on an assumption that peace is the health
of the state, that in other words, the peaceability of
people, both inside and outside the geography of a state
are both an indication of it’s nourishment of the goals and
purposes of the statehood and the nobility of the project it
has undertaken.
However, USA, brought a change to this in modern

politics, when it’s political state started to say that “war is
the health of the state…”, and to implement the notion
both that it is good for government internally to war
against it’s people and others, and that it will benefit it on
the outside too if it wars within and on the outside too. If
we break this down, it can be understood in more clearer
terms:

US war
There are three USA’s, one all the Muslims they’ve killed,
two, all the non-muslims they’ve killed and three, the fact
that they’ve killed everyone or three times the human
race since they invaded.
Internally External
to the
state
Inside US SLAVERY EXTREM-
ISM
Outside TERROR WAR

US
The root causes of slavery:
“Acceptability of slavery takes place in those societies

which are united by race but divided by geography and
desire return, and in which power is in the hands of the
few. These societies fear national and racial difference
and their racist agenda works to confirm the feeling that
they can keep themselves pure and be united.”
Moiram Ali, from an essay. “Slavery and Rapine”, from

the book “Slavery and racism”, Dr Mubarak Ali
(translated).
This is counterintuitive, to assume that race doesn’t form

a reason for the problems of US aggression, but rather, it
is a racial bond which does. Racism, therefore is being

seen as the root cause of slavery, segregation,

extremism, terror and war.
The people of USA are a people who were originally from

Europe, by and large, some from Africa, others from
elsewhere, such as the Middle East. The so-called
pilgrims were immigrants from Europe and because of
this, the nation is united on race but divided by
geography and needs to return (to a sense of roots, not
just geographical but on a sociological level).
Once there is economic equality in the USA, the fear of

national and racial disparity too will rescind. This is my
view. That because of the immense income inequality
across income groups or levels, and because of this
disparity internationally (US being economically
priveleged), there is a need to return to peaceability.
If the need to purify the USA from non-whites rescinds it

is only logical that USA will be, therefore purified of
whites, as white-coloured people are becoming a
minority. In a sense, the majoritarianism is deemed racist
over time, and a type of minoritarianism comes into play
to equalise the situation.
The idea of mutual subsidence of both economic and

racial inequality is difficult to deal with. The logic may
sound flawed, but follow an example. If two people enter
a place, it is different than if only one person were to.
Indeed it is only in the situation where there are many
people in a place that one or the other can then think to
leave, or be decided for him to make leave.
We are taught to think white-coloured man conquered

USA when he invaded it, he murdered the natives too
when he rapaciously invaded it, and he enforced racial
slavery.

Therefore according to the above example it would be

wrong to assume coloured folk were not to come out on
top, given we have rights.
Before we see the exact racial breakdown or even the

approximate racial make-up, we need to understand why
the class war is leading to this change.
In this example of two people entering a room, it is

possible to think clearly, that it would take a vote or an
agreement who will use the door first. What comes to
mind is that if there were one person, no such vote nor an
agreement could be required.
However, this is not what we are taught here, in life. What

we are taught is that one is right, and one is wrong, when
there are no rights and no wrongs, no firsts and seconds
here.
The material conditions are drastically altered in the world

we live in. If we factor in the relative changes in gender
roles, those economies known as developing economies
are finding a spare workforce, the womenfolk, who are,
with proper access to water and sanitation, now clean
and employable. This brings economies such as
Pakistan, rivalling USA for manpower by 2050; India,
scheduled to be a greater economy in 30 years time, and
China, a greater superpower, at least economically by 5
years from now: through the power of globalisation.
Now we can see the make-up of the people of USA. First

there were the Red Indians, then Europeans and
Africans.
So who should have their rights preserved? Black, white

or red Indian? The answer is not that retribution or
reparation is required here but rather that all three
deserve there dues.

They must share as mutually harmonious societies, with

the Muslim, christian and animist faiths they bring to the
table.
The physical and psychological effects of slavery, indeed

the treatment of red Indian together with slavery, as a
cultural phenomena, cannot be ignored. The ignorance
which led to it can be spelt out as follows.
Action Racism
Reaction Slavery
Solution Segregation
Similarly, the ignorance behind the calling of Muslims as

extremists:
Action War
Reaction Terrorism
Solution Extremism
Just as the evils of racism and slavery are ended by

ending segregation or racial segregation; the evil of
terrorism and indeed it’s more severe form, war, is ended
by ending extremism.
This leaves the UK with around 28m whites, 25m

Muslims and of the remaining 17m, maybe 10m blacks by

2050; and USA with an equal number of Muslims and

christians (around 50m) by the year 2080.
Peaceability is the health of the civil state and oppression

is it’s enemy, as is genocide of any people anywhere in
the world.

12. Naya Pakistan

The comparison across the cultures will leave us as
students of Pakistan Studies as richer without
comparison to other countries of the world. We are the
fifth greatest country on the world, there’s not a handful of
countries that are bigger than us in the world.
The direct comparison of modernity, post-modernity and

the causes of modernity, is through the father of the
notion of the fatherland of the Pak-nation.
1.) Pakistan
2.) Little Pakistan
3.) New Pakistan or Naya Pakistan
We still have at the level of Pakistan, with Pakistan, from

Pakistan and of Pakistan. The causes and what will grow
from these causes, are innate to the idea of Pakistan.
In comparison to the other major Muslim economic
power, Turkey, and this is common in European nations,
the fatherland of the Pak-nation, Pakistan-e-Azeem, is
central to Fiqhe Hanfia. Although Imam-e-Azam was in
effect an Iraqi-born jurist, his Fiqha or school of Fiqh
(Hanafi Madhab) is associated with the Pak-subcontinent
and the spread of Islam in Pakistan.
There is a notion of Pakistan, very similar, that I have

mapped onto modernity, postmodernity and the causes of
modernity. There is such thing as Turkistan (breaking
away from China) and Turkmenistan (broken away
already from Russia) as well as an alternative in the
Tartars , to the orthodox christian peoples.
Muta’ala-e-Pakistan

We also have the idea of the Indo-european languages

and modernity, not just Pakistan or with Pakistan, but
from Pakistan we have many concepts.
This evolves from the other side, more a cause from

economic, political economy and history. Of Pakistan and
fiqh-e-Hanfia in USA scheduled to undo the bible belt and
overtake christians this century.
The Asian century is not about Chinese detention camps

but we have to rise up. It’s not about UK nor USA, it’s
Little Pakistan, it’s New Pakistan or Naya Pakistan.
Not through jihad, or war and dawah, but through dawah

and natural progress on their own, because the system of
reproduction is proscribed by religion because of
homosexuality and illegitimate children, there will be a
decline in whites or christians or their old guard. We will
replace them slowly, with Pakistanis, little Pakistanis, new
Pakistanis, Muslim Pakistanis and the rest of the world
too should become embracing of the Islamic faith.

13. New hegemony

The growth of madrassahs and Islamic schools is
paramount in our spreading the Islamic faith to USA. This
is in stark contrast to the decline in morality of Americans,
who especially coloured americans are more prone to
divorce than marriage. Because this leads to illegitimate
children, the family, the religious unit is split further into
individualist dimensionality.
A new type of parenthood, parenting and indeed parent is

now born in the USA as the shift towards Islam and
Islamo-judeochristianity or Islamochristianity takes place
in this century, inshallah.
Because of this we must learn to bring Islam to the

forefront of our political conscience. The present system
should be malleable so that Urdu is spoken informally,
gfor example, or at least that students can still speak and
even think in their mother tongues in class.
Also, the rules for some things such as which calender is

more popular, should be more flexible, and most
importantly, if any of this is to happen, the government
must be brought in line as regards the Islamic transition.
They must stop spying on Islam and begin to take part
and implement it.
Islamic colleges and universities help in the spread of

Islam as a religion in the USA. This can mean studying
Islam directly with a view to life, and totally, without even
studying other subjects such as Arabic, with which it is
most often paired. A new adulthood, and a new type of
being adult is being created in USA.
We must stop the mentality of spying on Muslim students,

we are not far from the political detention camps of

Turkistan (ie China) if we allow the war of terror to leave

us vulnerable to the views of white Christian extremists.
If this is not a new world anymore, we can nevertheless

make USA a new Pakistan, where we understand the
liberation is needed for a people who, like in the sub-
continent seventy years ago, deserve freedom, not
slavery.
The growth of self-development and Islamic

accountability means Islam can spread into USA.
Numbers of mosques are rising as Americans realise
children finishing reading our Holy book means making
an occasion of the beginning and ending as bismillah,
amin, and istijabah of our prayers is from God Almighty,
as always.
Prayers are increasingly being said to Allah Almighty, by

youth sometimes for love and objects of love and too for
the sake of restraint of desires which may seem to be
immoral.
Indeed, the next generation will not only witness the rise
of atheism and demise of the legacy of the old christian
faith, but the children who will be planned will be brought
into this world and planned to be brought into this world,
as Muslims.
We do take an objection to Iraq and Syria wars, but aside

from our claims of genocide by uk and usa on the land of
(birthplace of) the old testament prophets and the new
testament prophet, we uphold both that the shift of
religion because of the demise of Christianism and the
rise of Islam, and the lucidity of US and UK war crimes
(to the ICC), have spelt out the death of Christianity for
Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

The system of reproduction
The system of reproduction can be broken down into

births, life or lives and deaths. These can be calculated
over time and, given an initial starting figure, the future
population or size of a community can be gleaned.
Birth is represented by crude births or the birth rate. To

this a fertility rate will tell us how this fluctuates over time.
Life or lives can be calculated by average life span which

is measured in years. This is typically much lower in
poorer countries.
Deaths can be calculated by the death rate or crude

deaths.
If we are looking at the Islamic faith community, the

ummah, we notice, both birth and fertility rate is higher
than others and so we observe a phenomenon whereby,
because in a new country, a country of immigration,
average lifespan is almost doubled, there is a pressure
on the system to be toppled, as the third area too comes
into play.
Whereas Muslims are faring well in the system of

reproduction as far as births and lives go, in deaths there
has been a war on Islam. Many have died and this is
explained by the non-Muslims as because of
overpopulation.
To end the war on Islam, we must realise it is healthier to

assume the rule of the west and begin to take western
countries over from the inside. To allow Islam to grow up
here will mean our acknowledging that the system of
reproduction has no overpopulation. Instead it has four
components.

1. Birth, measured by birth-rate and fertility rate

2. Marriage, measured by marriage rate less
divorce rate
3. Life, measured by average lifespan
4. Death, measured by crude deaths.
In this respect we see clearly the lucidity of the

disintegration of the west due to moral dissolution.
Even with equal populations or with both Muslim and

Christian countries, Islam will succeed on the
international level. Also, Islam will grow up, from minority
to majority where it doubles in size as other faiths halve
over time.
This is because birth are higher, because fertility is

higher. Marriages are higher, because divorce is lower,
lifespan is growing both in home and country of
immigration. The wars which are causing deaths are
ending, inshallah, and this rate too is favourable in it’s
application to Muslims.
Dawah to Non-Muslims
Islam
Religion
Faith Dawah

Tabligh with Muslims
Ihsan
Islam
Iman
Tabligh

14. Praxis
Deen-e-Islam vs Deen-e-jamhour
Deen-e-jamhour (majority rule) is secularism’s answer to

the religion of Allah subhanahu wa ta Ala, just as
democracy is atheism’s answer to dar al Islam.
It is not to put power in the hands of Muslims that it is

sought to defend the faith of Islam by presenting he
places of worship as Muslim, but rather it is to defend the
principles of faith that we seek to relinquish our right of
rule or khilafah.
If the modern land falls through success in the political

constituency then by rights the rules of that modern land,
it’s legislation and statutes fall to the way of the faith by
which it practises it’s living out of God Almighty’s kingdom
in this universe and their share in that. If it is wrong to
argue the ascendancy of one religion over another,
nowhere is that more so, when it is wrong to argue the
case of votaries and votarists of one faith when defined
by the system of rule and yet another one when defined
by the system of worship.
Racial superiority complex
This world and it’s politics teaches us many things. Like

God Almighty has given humanity through Islam five
pillars to man’s life and five prayers for day and night-
time, if we are chasing money in life Satan will give his
five loves to tempt us. Women who are a temptation,
money which diverts from prayer, children who in feeding
we don’t feed the poor, friendship which does not lead
towards Allah’s house and science which prevents fasting
for God Almighty.

In this regard, materialism or rationalism is dominant to

Islam, like below. Islamic or universal or world way was
prescribed by Gaddafi. The split is reminiscent of
extremism and terrorism, where the Islamic forms of
political economy are being overhauled by extremist ones
or fundamentalist or terrorist ones, must deserve
attention.
Capitalism- DOMINANT
communism
ISLAM
Islamic recessive
socialism or
democracy
Islamic socialism, or “nazariyah alamiyah thalatha” has in

some respects, taken a battering, for example in Libya,
but there are very many powerful countries who are in the
Islamic world and judged as democracies who need to
fight off the fundamentalists, the economic
fundamentalists, that is.
North -South divide
What we are taught as dominant and recessive is actually

North and South. Economists such as Amin has said the
triad, US, Europe and Japan is north and everywhere
else in the world is the south.
Racial complexes arise from an actual inferiority complex

which is innate to any peoples who have shifted from one
continent to another. USA is a good example of this, as
are Islamic nations as they and their people move into

Europe. Coupled with the problem of changing

geography and race added in, where power becomes
localised and is for the few, this creates issues with i.)
Immigration, ii.) hegemony and iii.) plutocracy and
isonomy.
Religion in USA - the decline of christianity and rise of

Islam
The replacement theologically, the transference,

religiously and the praxis of faith, practically, Islam. The
demise of christianism to Islam will take place in the
coming generation in our children because Muslims will
eventually outnumber Christians in UK and then in USA.
The religion of Islam built America as a country because

30-40% of slaves were Muslim faith. The white house
was built by Muslim hands.

The hegemonic nature, immigration-booming and

individualism of capitalism takes a shift this century from
christianism to Islam ruling over USA. This is definite in
terms of predicted growth in this century. Whereas really,
historically, the European race was an issue, now Islam
is conqueror, American geography is now Islamic country
and power is in hands of many not few.
U-curve of religion in USA over time

250
200
150
100
50
0 Islam Christianism
2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
Hegemonic u-curve, dominant religion in USA illustrated by the

curve
World Population figures -2050 est. In brackets.
India -135 crore (1.7b)

China -140 crore (1.3b)
USA – 33 crore (.4b)

Pakistan -21 crore (.3b)
Demographic and bioethical considerations come into a

direct clash with the practical sociology of religions
whether in the UK or in the USA. In this country, UK, the
notion of a practical religion or deen-e-aamah in arabic,
is, if not a new statistical or sociological perspective in the
sense of shedding light on ethical and moral aspects of
religion, nonetheless an illumination of a new religion for
the people of the British Isles.
The population of a country and its general populous is

then filtered into a concept forming or specifying people
are votaries, in general of one faith and of no other. The
use of language here is pertinent and nuanced. There is
a clear differentiation between saying, “people are, in
general, votaries of one faith”, and “people are votaries,
in general of one faith”. The first phrase refers to an
ambiguous and unspecified society or grouping, whereas
the second is generating an unambiguous specification of
a faith group which has votaries.
This draws us into a notion of knowing a difference

between our religion and the practical religion, deen-e-
amaliah in arabic. The difference here in the religion of
the masses of our population and the masses of our
population’s religion is in the intimation of the religion of
the masses of our population.
Practical religion
Islamic votaries in UK (Fridays)
Mosques 2300 X
Votarists 660
----------------
1,518,000
----------------

Churchgoers (Sundays)
Church
of england 703,000 x
(add catholics
and others) 3
-------------
2,109,000
Direct extrapolation of birth rate, and plus fertility rate for

Islam, gives straight lines for Isaiyat (Christianity or
Christianism), and upward curving lines for Islam, into the
future. As atheism and “no religion” take hold, in the
states as they have in Britain, the prophets of doom are
voicing themselves for the christians.

15. Net GDP or net debt?

Net GDP calulation for USA
Official GDP (PPP) 2018 21 trillion -

Official net federal debt. 22 trillion
———-
Net debt 1 trillion
————
Cost of war of terror 6 trillion
History as calamity, modernity as war
Eight calamities of UK & USA

All 100m human losses
Slavery
Red indian holocaust
Muslim indian holocaust
Cultural revolution
Holodomor
WW1
WW2
GWOT
Eight wars of UK & USA

All military defeats
Af-pak
Syria
Iraq
Yemen
Sahil (Africa) - Mali, Niger

Sudan
Somalia
List of economic nations with China at the head
List of economic nations with China at the head

- Dar al Islam or partially in green
GDP (PPP) -US$
China 19,524,348
US 17,946,996
India 7,982,528
Japan 4,738,294
Germany 3,848,272
Russian Federation 3,579,826
Brazil 3,192,398
Indonesia 2,842,241
United Kingdom 2,691,809
France 2,650,823
Mexico 2,194,431
Italy 2,182,580
Korea, Rep. 1,748,776
Saudi Arabia 1,685,204
Spain 1,602,660
Canada 1,588,596
Turkey 1,543,284
Iran, Islamic Rep. 1,357,025
Thailand 1,108,108
Nigeria 1,091,698
Australia 1,082,380
Egypt, Arab Rep. 996,638
Poland 993,129
Pakistan 952,505
Netherlands 820,726
Malaysia 815,645

Philippines 741,029
South Africa 723,516
Colombia 665,594
United Arab Emirates 643,166
Algeria 582,598
Vietnam 552,297
Iraq 542,520
Bangladesh 536,567
Switzerland 501,653
Belgium 496,477
Singapore 471,631
Sweden 454,868
Kazakhstan 453,981
Romania 424,474
Hong Kong SAR, China 414,376
Austria 411,818
Chile 400,534
Peru 389,147
Czech Republic 339,402
Ukraine 339,155
Qatar 321,418
Norway 319,401
Portugal 302,329
Israel 296,931
Greece 288,778
Kuwait 277,554
Morocco 273,358
Denmark 264,702
Ireland 253,635
Hungary 251,842
Sri Lanka 246,117
Cuba 234,624
Finland 222,575
Uzbekistan 187,668
Angola 184,438
Ecuador 183,855
Oman 171,692
Azerbaijan 171,214

New Zealand 169,960

Belarus 168,009
Sudan 167,909
Ethiopia 161,571
Slovak Republic 156,632
Dominican Republic 149,627
Kenya 141,951
Tanzania 138,461
Tunisia 126,598
Guatemala 125,950
Puerto Rico 125,861
Bulgaria 125,699
Ghana 115,137
Yemen, Rep. 96,812
Serbia 95,698
Croatia 92,432
Libya 88,867
Turkmenistan 88,657
Panama 87,196
Jordan 82,631
Lebanon 81,547
Lithuania 80,699
Côte d'Ivoire 79,361
Costa Rica 73,931
Bolivia 73,796
Cameroon 72,896
Uruguay 72,751
Uganda 71,246
Nepal 70,090
Macao SAR, China 65,383
Bahrain 64,656
Slovenia 64,229
Afghanistan 62,913
Zambia 62,458
Paraguay 60,977
Congo, Dem. Rep. 60,482
Luxembourg 58,065
Cambodia 54,263

El Salvador 52,701
Latvia 48,049
Trinidad and Tobago 44,334
Mali 42,737
Honduras 41,057
Bosnia and Herzegovina 40,046
Lao PDR 38,605
Estonia 36,860
Senegal 36,776
Mongolia 36,068
Botswana 35,763
Georgia 35,610
Madagascar 35,366
Gabon 34,523
Mozambique 33,177
Albania 32,663
Nicaragua 31,564
Chad 30,481
Burkina Faso 30,041
Brunei Darussalam 29,969
Congo, Rep. 29,423
Macedonia, FYR 28,907
Zimbabwe 27,985
Cyprus 25,864
Namibia 25,606
Equatorial Guinea 25,386
Armenia 25,329
Jamaica 24,704
Mauritius 24,596
Tajikistan 23,579
Benin 22,955
South Sudan 22,829
West Bank and Gaza 22,155
Papua New Guinea 21,384
Rwanda 20,418
Kyrgyz Republic 20,413
Malawi 20,359
Niger 18,975

Haiti 18,875
Moldova 17,908
Kosovo 17,454
Mauritania 15,425
Iceland 15,399
Guinea 15,213
Malta 12,500
Swaziland 10,845
Togo 10,663
Sierra Leone 10,264
Montenegro 9,638
Bahamas, The 9,233
Suriname 9,214
Burundi 8,228
Fiji 8,171
Bhutan 6,258
Guyana 5,758
Lesotho 5,585
Maldives 5,170
Barbados 4,659
Liberia 3,766
Cabo Verde 3,482
Bermuda 3,409
Gambia, The 3,155
Belize 3,064
Central African Republic 2,927
Djibouti 2,876
Timor-Leste 2,813
Guinea-Bissau 2,680
Seychelles 2,534
Antigua and Barbuda 2,109
St. Lucia 2,033
Grenada 1,385
St. Kitts and Nevis 1,354
Solomon Islands 1,276
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 1,207
Samoa 1,144
Comoros 1,105

Dominica 820
Vanuatu 787
São Tomé and Principe 594
Tonga 552
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 348
Palau 325
Kiribati 209
Marshall Islands 202
Tuvalu 37
“The united states can no longer claim to be a superpower”
- Sayd Moqtada Sadr

15. Globalisation
We accuse the western countries of schizophrenia in the
following: it is not a question of taking on diplomacy and
taking on war in the respect of either/or; but rather, if that
hasn’t happened, if they don’t take to that, we will strike
them. We will refrain from spreading the avenues of love
and counsel and go to war and fight them. This is the way
that they have to understand. The policy of thistle and
drone has meant we will outnumber them and overpower
them, their policies coming in through the back door of
the Muslim world.
What we are seeing in the war of terror is a twin-

prongued assault of diplomacy and war (thistle and
drone). Having not asked for it, it is called by us as
schizophrenia and nothing to do with security and war of
either side. This is to do with schizophrenia of diplomatic
circles of western governments.
The difference between the household schizophrenia and

this is not so far a removal of logic. If a house is
schizophrenic, the nation starts acting out towards other
countries’ civilisations and cultures. First, there is thistle,
rose-tinted spectacles of diplomacy, and then the same
countrymen attack the people with drones.
They don’t understand it themselves. They are victim of

their own oppression. Victims of their clergy, their history.
Their theology, Christianity is a victim of Judaism.
The thistle and drone is just a metaphor to explain

schizophrenia in a people who equate godhead with
murder.

The war of terror is not just to annihilate numbers of the

male population of Iraq, Syria or Afghanistan. It is where
you do it to their face, without your love ever getting to
them.
They are afraid of being defeated in their homes. 70-80%

of African americans are having illegitimate children.
There is no legitimacy for a nation with so many
illegitimate children.
They take this out on the dual philosophy of thistle and

drone schizophrenia. This plague spreads relating to the
rest of us in this world.
They aim for us to cease to be tribes and nations and to

be ethnicities. To not be tribes is possible because we
will be ethnic Muslims, in the west. We would outnumber
them and overpower them, nevertheless as UK is
scheduled to be dar al Islam or relative Muslim majority
by 30 years and USA this century too.
For Akbar Ahmad, the thistle and the drone represent

tribes and war, east and west, innocent civilisation and
kill-technology, Asia and Europe, Islam and Christianity.
The rise of Islam and the death of Christianity in the

respect that after the war, there is an accommodation of
progress in our world, such that although government
takes little notice in it’s ways, western peoples, and the
definition of western peoples (the definition of the religion
of western peoples) is forever changed.
In this respect the definition of the metaphor is one of

religion and reason. Theology and mere rationalism or
rationalisation.
As a daily religious praxis (USA) and weekly worship in

houses of worship (UK) change, it is the Bibles’ genesis

and sabbath that remain as firmly Islamically-informed

concepts and this is so throughout planet earth, from
Islamic to non-Muslim sources.
The point of view from the aggressors, the Judeo-

christian old guard, is that we Muslims should be as
ethnicities without regard to the tribal realities. If the
future is written to pass as Islamo-christian, it would be
frought with blurring the line of security over war, and
security over terrorism, as is sometimes said in Muslim
countries; simply to win a petty western clash.
If nationalism is the enemy of rational and religious

thinking, then it is because of Protestantism (Nazism) and
Catholicism (Fascism), and we will as a species, be
confronted with nationalism’s best friend, globalisation:
The threat of communism ruling the world, to USA, is not
a new threat, not of loss to US stocks and so on nor of
others’ within USA having power over others; rather it is
to do with the fact of communism and the peaceable rise
of China above USA as a world economy, exposes their
racial superiority complex having an origin in their
inferiority complex.
ISLAM Christian
Freedom Extremism Terror-
ism
Islam Nazism Fascism
Sunnis, Catholic- Protestnt
Shi’ism, ism -ism
Sufism
Economics Giga- Mega-
murder murder
The big joke in the political geography of today, is not the

extinction of a billion and the threat to the survival of this

species and the evolutionary and biological implications,

but rather it is the idea that USA or the UK are united
kingdom or united states, when clearly an analysis of
their international conduct reveals they are a divisive
people with divided selves and divided theologies and
theocidal godheads.
They say Islamic State has done ethnic cleansing what of

the christian state or kingdom? Where in the world has it
not caused genocide in our respected people, both
politically across the world and historically in antiquity and
modernity?
I ask this bearing in consideration that for every victim of

their direct aggression there are ninety-nine indirect
victims, harmed by their collateral damage, genocidal
rape, famine, drought, disease and non-terminal
illnesses.

16. Pakistan studies

When our great nation, Pakistan-e-azeem was created,
East and West Pakistan both had a population of around
half of the 75 million, it was such a country that the
despotic ruler Queen Victoria of Britain displayed the
imperialist death toll of the so-called British Raj in India.
Pakistan was only a fraction of the Muslim India (300
million population in total).
Nay, Muslim India, or Mughal India, dawlah al Islam, now

dar al Islam, in other words, the Muslim lands, had a
population in 1947, a third of which had been slaughtered
by famine and so on.
No, the number of casualties in Muslim or Mughal India

or Dar al Salaam is three times the number of our people
in our blessed country. This is what we have seen in 218
years.
India, as a civilization, recognizes Sanskrit as its own,

sanskar as it’s own culture. Sanskriti was an ancient
language that they recognized as their own, and for
various reasons with linguistic complexities, they
traditionally adapted to other civilizations because of the
enormous need to explain the reality contained within us
allows us to compare as the other three major languages
of the world, and even Arabic: language, people and
religion.
This not only proves that Pakistan is an intuitive

superpower, but if the subcontinent does not create a
superpower, it must work through an army of criminals
and there can be widespread famine on the domestic
soil.

Pakistani’s have in our language, a natural difference of

root word for our language, our culture, and our people.
Hindu cannot claim this. Neither can Chinese,, nor
English, nor Arab. This further relates to the fact that as
Muslims we have unique words for our leaders, followers
and our God. The kafir uses same root word, such as
Rav and rabbi, in judaism.
Conjugation in mother languages (of non-Muslims)
Language Culture Religion
‫ اردو‬/िहं दी Pakistani Islam
English English
中⽂文中國⼈人
español El español
In other words kafirs are conjugated faiths unlike Islam,

which is belief in One God, in Allah (SWT) and in his
Messenger (SWS). This conjugation is there both in
dharam (four religions) and in Bible (two religions).
This conjugation is visible insanity. According to the

minority ethnicity in London, UK and US, so/called
Christians, monotheism has been dead and buried,
prophecy has been replaced by tyranny of the trinity and
trinitarians.
Jesus replaces Abraham according to the conjugate Bible

and seeing the latter parts of the synoptic gospels, father
kills son too. Abrahamism, is long gone and prophecy
has been replaced by something which is nothing but

lies. Conjugation, multiple fiction and psychological

madness fill the major books. Indeed, they do but don’t
do. In doing they don’t do.
When we talk of Pakistan as a great power, we

remember the responsibility that is upon us and that
binds us. Jinnah’s Pakistan was a purjosh Pakistan
(Passionate Pakistan) and represents a vision in itself for
a world power to emerge.
What defines Pakistan and Pakistanis is the role

Pakistanis play in the religion of this world. Paramount to
this is the religion of the UK and USA. Historically, USA is
a land of two wars, with UK, the war of independence,
and the civil war.
However, it is the wars USA has waged against Muslim

economies or countries which have made for “holocaust
personalities” in the western mindset, typified by the US
president whose latest mega-assault is on the blessed
country of Pakistan.
The idea of the holocaust personality is that US

presidents have each committed 3 holocausts, on
average.
Af-pak is just an extension of the war on terror or of

terror, the western barbaric war on Islam and Muslims,
where 94% of those murdered are Muslims if not 100%.
(Teyyip Erdogan)
The war against Islam requires a resistance movement

because at the height of our jihad we face the whole of
the planet’s folks murder. This is because when the USA
invaded America till today they have annihilated three
humanity’s worth of human life. With the human cost
measured in 1492 terms, that is many times or manifold
the Muslim population (around ten times) and manifold

the non-Muslim population (slightly over a hundred

percent) as well. (One billion over a hundred and fifty
million or over eight hundred and fifty million).
Muslims are both sensitive and sensible peoples, we are,

as believers to have different qualities than others, who
are kafir. One striking difference in this respect with
regard to language and socio-cultural differences is that
nationalism is viewed differently for us and for
disbelievers.
As an Urdu speaking person, I can read tafhim or tafseer

of my Holy book in the Urdu language. I can do this as a
Pakistani and this makes me a Pakistani. However it is
my belief that I do not exclude anyone or anything from
being themselves in doing that. My nationalism is Islamic
because I am part of the Umma and a Muslim on top of
what I have already said.
The kuffar on the other hand are not sensitive nor are
they sensible. They know the same root word for the
language, society, and the culture. One can say the same
word for God, god’s representative and a follower
whereas we don’t, we have different words for them
same things.
Kuffar peoples include the masses of Chinese peoples,

Spanish peoples, Indian peoples and English peoples.
The people represent Islamic economies, dar al Islam,
dawlah al Islam and Muslims but nevertheless they are
insensitive and not sensible.
The fact is sometimes the infidels say we are uncultured

and should be engendered away from Islam, our religion.
Yet we know the reverse to be true. It is not just religious
folk who say it is good to convert disbelievers or revert
them to Islam, rather regular Muslims too, because it is
like this we are seen as being sensitive and sensible.

The reason Muslims can boast this of our culture, our

country, Pakistan is that Urdu is the world’s softest
language, and it’s root language, Sankrit is world’s most
complex language.
Kafir people should be made, through wisdom and

beautiful preaching to pray in Arabic and speak to Allah
Almighty through the Muslim prayer, salah. In this way
their nationalism will not arise except by Islam.
Whether Chinese, American, Indian, European or British,

if they speak more Arabic and refer to God Almighty as is
His proper name, Allah subhanahu wa ta Ala, it is best for
their world and their hereafter.
To bring this about Muslims need to stop using local

dialects, neyhow, pranam, hello and hola, and start every
conversation with Salam. No Salam, no Kalam. To our
brothers and sisters in Islam, reply Salam with Salam,
there is nothing better. No Salam, no Kalam.
This can be said of the major languages of the world, that

Salam should be used in replacement for them,
especially where their language isn’t indigenous to them,
such as the English language in USA. There,
Washington, the dar al hakoomat is the name of their first
megamurderer or invader/ruler. It is noted that it is
Washington which wars extremely hard with the rest, and
not the other way round.
It does need to be pointed out that people in USA, or

British-people are megamurderers and this is very
unfortunate. There is therefore nothing wrong with calling
it one country or city, Londonistan. It is similar to calling
China, Turkistan (a reference to the Muslim area there),
or Spain and Portugal, Al andalus, or even calling India
as Hindustan.

Just as Hindustan and Al Andalus were ruled by Islam,

Turkistan, too is fine, then Londonistan, will be ruled by
Muslims, inshallah.

Is Christianity extremist and

are all christians extremists?
We can take a positive approach to the Bible and
Christianity and answer a question which needs to be
asked about Christians. Are they the extremists we are all
really talking about and worried about?
The way to do this is simply that seeing their failures

around the world to have what Muslims have in Islam,
and their clear jealousy of Islamic concepts, to try to
answer a question that if, even in UK and USA, The Holy
Quran is more popular and it’s teachings are now
observed more than the Bible; Judeo-christianity, as it
were is an economic discourse. If we can disprove this
hypothesis, maybe it can be proved that our brothers,
believers, they say in Christ Jesus, are not extremist.
However, this is impossible. The economic and political

plight, and we too find the social plight is split in the
western model into Christianity’s two extremes,
capitalism and communism. These totalitarian forms
inform the thinking of the Judeo-christian model. It is
considered a lie to say we can be political without this
innate historical extremism.
Take, for example the idea that capitalism brings to the

table, that there should, in the US political model, for
example, be perfect economic competition. In this
situation, there is an example from everyday life that we
can use to explain the economic model of perfect
competition. That situation will then inform us of how this
extremist form has seeped into our world and how to
reject it.

Say for example, everybody had infinite wealth in the

sense of we all had access to an innumerable amount of
resources which have obviously come from somewhere.
In this situation, it could be said that no person would be
wealthier than another as all are equally, infinitely
wealthy. It is likely that the christians, the people of the
bible, in the west of the world, also on the right, see this
as the perfect situation. Conversely, if everybody was
infinitely poor and none had access to wealth, assuming
it has been taken by some outside force, and continues
to be taken. In this situation, it could be said too that no
person would be wealthier than another as all are
equally, infinitely poor. It is likely that the jews and
christians, the people of the bible, in the east of the world,
would see this as a command from above. So the same
goes for if everyone is equal throughout the society, the
people of the book, in eastern parts of the world, or the
political left, will accept this is as ideal.
So the conclusion is, the real problem is pantheism,

addressing it as economic is not a perfect metaphor.
Capitalism and communism are not the same as God and
man, like the extremists say. Nevertheless it does prove
Jews and Christians, and sometimes others are
extremists in a sense, that they go overboard on these
two theoretical models without a reality or without any
basis, moral basis that is, in reality. They have power and
wealth, they say, or wealth and power but they are not
egalitarian or equal in it’s distributing.
Instead of looking at it as there are these two ways, God

and man, man and God, by which Allah has created
mankind and we have harnessed nature, it’s energies
and resources and created our wealth; we look at it as a
contract with Him ta Ala called deen, religion or Islam.
There is therefore no need for talk of perfect competition
and imperfect competition and mixed economies and
command economies, when clearly all economies are

mixed to some extent. If there is no antinomy here (in

terms of both competition and command are accepted as
flawed theoretical contraptions), maybe it is proved not
just that all economics is mixed and balanced, but also
that the Christian godhead is wrong in that God has
created man and God can give man his wealth too.
It is merely a matter of harnessing nature and sourcing

the energies such as oil; steam for a steam engine, wind
for a windmill, as we have done through antiquity until the
modern industrial revolutions. Information technology is
one thing to start with, and information systems are a
great potential for us Muslim nations.
Today’s revolutionary power of China, is through

digitalisation it can defeat the superpower of USA. After
all USA defeated Europe’s industrial power which itself
was a move over the natural power of Persia.
The evolution from the wind age, to the steam age, to the
electrical/nuclear age, also the space age through to the
computer age, internet age and system age, shows how
Muslims are the beginning and end of human evolution
through human history.
Action Materialism
Reaction Capitalism
Solution Communism
The peaceable rise of China as a disproof of

Christianity
Indeed to make grain, the Muslim world (specifically

Persia) created the windmill, harnessing the power of
natural resource of wind. For logistical purposes, the
industrial revolution in Europe used steam to power the

steam-trains. America used electrical devices and

applicances to modernise the world.
However these were, if you like all megapowers which

are being left behind. Going forward with gigapowers, the
computer revolution of China is where the world economy
is today. Pakistan and India will then have the potential of
information technology and information systems to power
the internet across the globe and to move through the
age of technology into a systems age.
Pakistan as an information age leader of world

powers.
Country Symbol Nature Resource

Persia The windmill Wind Grain
The steam
Europe Water Transport
engine
The electrical
USA Electricity Computer
device
China The computer Internet Technology
India The Internet Cyberpower Systems

The
Pakistan Systems Information
System
The legacy of power involved shows different phases of

natural or non-human powers being utilised, as well as
the mechanism by which the harnessing of the energy
takes place. Natural power, industrial power, industrial
power, super power, revolutionary power, cyber power
and system power.

Conclusion- Islam
Islam is a religion which means peace and a Muslim
should not consider raising a fitna towards his own
government as this would be made worse if the
government raises a fitna with him or someone else who
is Muslim.
Pax Humanus is people with a sense of egalitarianism, a sense of

proportionality and the power of prayer developing in us what
basically means doing our best, Pax Pakistanis, or the Pak era.
This is a time of immense war, more than ever before, and often we
see that Islam is the way to peace to rid us of this war, like
liberation rids us of occupation.
Landscape and resources mean opportunities for the wider world,

greater than Switzerland and Malaysia, making Pakistan, according
to Prime Minister Imran Khan, a goldmine of opportunity. We are
the green finger of the world but we can become the Goldfinger, if
we can make Christianity in USA a minority and the whites a
minority.
If our great nation, Pakistan is a goldmine of opportunity, the land

opportunity should be a part of this landscape, and UK too.
For Pakistan, a majorly agricultural economy aligning the provision

of resources and creation of production and the mode of production
of goods, services and so on. To become a goldmine we must
combine industry spread in our country and provide a population
and legislation to have industries for us to enjoy throughout the
world.
A new political geography for America, a new race and a new

system of power for the many!

Appendix-
U-curves
Graphs showing Christianity as a minority religion in USA

(164 of 329 million)
1.
U-curve of religion in USA

180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Daily Weekly Votaries
Islam Christianity
The daily, weekly and actual admitted votaries of Islam

and Christianism in USA

2.
U-curve of religion in USA over time

180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
Islam
0
Christianism
2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
Graph detailing hegemony of faith groups in USA, with

2080 set as the date of Islamic ascendancy
3. Muslims outnumber C of E votaries in UK
C of E Sunday churchgoers 2016……….7.22 lakh

Muslim Friday Mosquegoers 2019 est….1.5m
(Number of mosques X estimated average attendance)
Masjids…………2060 (from database)
Jammat size……330
Jammat number…2
___
1.5m
Around 30% of Muslims are mosque-goers

Diagrams
Bullseye diagrams:
Page 14 -Centripetal megaforces stuck in a vicious circle
Page 18 -Tabdeeli (change)
Page 22 -Centrifugal gigaforces in a cyclic pattern
U-curves:
Page 53 – Basic U- curve
Page 54 – USA Islamic, Christian and total populations
Page 72 – Religion in USA
Page 73 – Hegemonic U-curve
Page 93 – U-curve of religion in USA
Page 94 – U-curve of religion in USA over time

Globalisation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Globalisation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Globalisation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Londonistan

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

In London, where people who are 20 to 40% Muslim 1,

They are extremely against Palestinians since 1948.

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

1. Islam is not extremism

Perhaps this is the central tenet of freedom itself: that it

As a Muslim and a practising Muslim, I believe in the

However, this does not lead me to any satisfying

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

polarised, is the cause of evil. Whether it is religious

The only place where it is clear in social theory or in

What has happened is we are told to see China as

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

slavery, religion, totalitarianism, freedom of expression,

In the realisation that Islam is a religion which

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

that the final solution is one of, not extermination of

This is logical that dharma can be analysed and be said

If we expand this analysis, we can take the initial

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

There is sometimes a difference between a religious

The link between extremism and terrorism is weakly

What appears to have happened, quite apart from the

A bifurcation of an economically grounded, and

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

extremist west with a religiously founded rest of the

The ulterior sides to accusations of Muslims as

It is this second split of reality and fiction; from

Firstly, the war on terror was justified, though not in all

Secondly, the relationship between east and west or

The defenders of reason (rationalism), are, in my view,

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

witness the depth of the horror or terror of wars; it

What is clear in a crossfire of accusations, is that there

This chapter will take a look at the four

1. Materialism is the cause of it’s

2. Materialism is the cause of it’s

3. Muslim sacrifices in the global

4. War is worse than terrorism- The

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

5. The conclusion is that terror is

This is the nature not of the moment but rather of the

I don’t talk about the bible, about government. I don’t

It’s a simple mindset saying the monism (singularity),

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

DIAGRAM 1: CENTRIPETAL MEGAFORCES

As Pakistanis, our national language, Urdu and our

The real thing is that in the enlightened future of the

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

overweight. We do have to admit these are in reality

This is wrong, we must see the real progress and

The sourcing of the first world through the outsourcing

It does this by an awareness of the limitations of

Londonistan Globalisation Omar Butt

Materialism is the cause of it’s own extremism and this