Server-Side Rendering (SSR) Is A Web Development Technique Where The 2

Server-side rendering (SSR) generates HTML on the server and sends a fully rendered page to the client, resulting in faster initial load times but less interactivity. Client-side rendering (CSR) generates HTML on the client using JavaScript, resulting in slower initial load but more interactivity. SSR is better for SEO and accessibility while CSR has lower server loads and is easier to develop. The best approach depends on an application's specific requirements regarding performance, interactivity, and traffic.

Uploaded by

lokeshd298

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

59 views2 pages

Server-Side Rendering (SSR) Is A Web Development Technique Where The 2

Uploaded by

lokeshd298

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 2

Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is a web development technique where the HTML of a page

is generated on the server and sent to the client. This results in a fully rendered page
being displayed to the user as soon as it loads.

Client-Side Rendering (CSR) is a web development technique where the HTML of a page is
generated on the client using JavaScript. This results in a partially rendered page being
displayed to the user initially, and the rest of the page is rendered dynamically as the user
interacts with it.
Differences between SSR and CSR:

● Timing: SSR is faster for the initial page load, as the HTML is already generated on the
server and sent to the client. CSR is slower for the initial page load, as the client needs to
download and execute JavaScript to render the HTML. However, CSR can be faster for
subsequent page interactions, as the client does not need to download new HTML from
the server.
● Interactivity: CSR is more interactive than SSR, as the JavaScript code running on the
client can dynamically update the page without having to reload it. SSR is less interactive,
as the HTML is generated on the server and sent to the client in a static state.
● SEO: SSR is better for SEO than CSR, as search engines can easily crawl and index the
fully rendered HTML pages. CSR is less SEO-friendly, as search engines may not be able
to crawl and index the dynamically generated HTML pages.

Advantages and disadvantages of SSR:

Advantages:
● Faster initial page load
● Better for SEO
● More accessible to users with JavaScript disabled
Disadvantages:
● Less interactive
● More complex to develop and maintain
● Higher server load

Advantages and disadvantages of CSR:

Advantages:
● More interactive
● Easier to develop and maintain
● Lower server load
Disadvantages:
● Slower initial page load
● Less SEO-friendly
● Less accessible to users with JavaScript disabled

Scenarios where SSR is more suitable:

● Websites that need to be highly interactive, such as social media platforms and e-
●
commerce websites.
● Websites that need to have fast initial page loads, such as news websites and landing
pages.
● Websites that need to be highly SEO-friendly, such as business websites and online
portfolios.
Scenarios where CSR is more suitable:
● Websites that need to be highly dynamic and responsive to user input, such as real-time
chat applications and data visualization tools.
● Websites that need to be scalable and able to handle a large number of concurrent users,
such as social media platforms and e-commerce websites.
● Websites that need to be developed and maintained quickly and easily, such as personal
blogs and small business websites.

Strategies for combining SSR and CSR:

● Universal rendering: This strategy involves rendering the initial page load on the server
and then hydrating the client with JavaScript to make the page more interactive. This
approach is the best of both worlds, as it provides the fast initial page load times of SSR
and the interactivity of CSR.
● Hybrid rendering: This strategy involves rendering some parts of a page on the server and
other parts on the client. For example, the static header and footer of a website could be
rendered on the server, while the dynamic content in the middle of the page could be
rendered on the client. This approach can be used to balance the performance and
interactivity of a web application.

Ultimately, the best way to choose between SSR and CSR is to consider the specific needs of
your web application. If you need a fast and SEO-friendly website, then SSR is a good choice. If
you need a highly interactive and dynamic website, then CSR is a good choice