Lab 3
Lab 3
Vs D1 Vo R
ωt
π 2π
Vo
ωt
α π+ α
ig1
ωt
α π+ α
Fig 3.2: Expected output for phase control unipolar ac-ac voltage controller.
1 𝜋 2𝜋
𝑽𝒐 (𝒂𝒗𝒈) = 2𝜋 [∫𝛼 √2𝑣 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝜔𝑡 𝑑(𝜔𝑡) + ∫𝜋 √2𝑣 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝜔𝑡 𝑑(𝜔𝑡)]
By solving,
√2𝑉𝑠
𝑉𝑜, 𝑎𝑣𝑔 = (𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 − 1)
2𝜋
If α is varied from 0 to π, Vo varies from Vs to Vs/√2 and Vdc varied from 0 to −√2𝑉𝑠/𝜋.
T2 Vo R
Vs
Vs
ωt
π 2π
Vo
ωt
π
2π
ig1
ωt
α1 π+ α1
ig2
ωt
α2 π+ α2
Figure-3.4: Expected output for phase control bipolar ac-ac voltage controller.
330 Ω
µc(5) 1 6
2 4
220 Ω
T1
+5 v
1 kΩ
1 kΩ PC 817
D1 R
1 4 µc(2,3)
2 3
330 Ω
µc(5) 1 6
2 4
220 Ω
T1
+5 v
1 kΩ
1 kΩ PC 817
T2 R
1 4 µc(2,3)
2 3
220 Ω
330 Ω
µc(6) 1 6
2 4
MOC 3012
Output waveform
Fig 3.7: Phase control unipolar with resistive load at firing angle 0º.
Input Waveform
Output waveform
Fig 3.8: Phase control unipolar with resistive load at firing angle 30º.
Input Waveform
Output waveform
Fig 3.9: Phase control unipolar with resistive load at firing angle 45º.
Input Waveform
Output waveform
Fig 3.10: Phase control unipolar with resistive load at firing angle 60º.
Input Waveform
Output waveform
Fig 3.11: Phase control unipolar with resistive load at firing angle 90º.
Input Waveform
Output waveform
Fig 3.12: Phase control unipolar with resistive load at firing angle 150º.
3.6.2 Phase control bipolar:
Output waveform
Input Waveform
Fig 3.13: Phase control bipolar with resistive load at firing angle 30º.
Output waveform
Input Waveform
Fig 3.14: Phase control bipolar with resistive load at firing angle 45º.
Output waveform
Input Waveform
Fig 3.15: Phase control bipolar with resistive load at firing angle 60º.
.
Output waveform
Input Waveform
Fig 3.16: Phase control bipolar with resistive load at firing angle 90º.
Output waveform
Input Waveform
Fig 3.17: Phase control bipolar with resistive load at firing angle 150º.
3.7 Discussion and Conclusion: The AC to AC (phase) voltage controller was the main topic
of the experiment, which included both unidirectional and bi-directional operations with a R
load. Furthermore, the power factor graph was noticed, which was obtained by the analysis of
the input and output waveforms. A variety of graphs were examined, and different firing angles
were used. To make sure that nothing undesirable happened, the microcontroller code was
checked several times. A comprehensive investigation of point-to-point connections was
carried out to provide a dependable power source. The transformer's subpar state was the cause
of the spikes in the sinusoidal input waveform. In spite of this difficulty, the experiment was
eventually finished successfully.
References:
1.https://mrcet.com/downloads/digital_notes/EEE/power%20electronics%20dig
ital%20notes.pdf
2.https://www.academia.edu/38989807/Power_Electronics_Circuits_Devices_a
nd_Applications_By_Muhammad_H_Rashid
Appendix
Microcontroller Program for SCR Gate Pulse:
Code for Unipolar:
int angle, a, b, angle2, deg1, deg2;
void setup() {
pinMode(5, OUTPUT);
attachInterrupt(1, test2, FALLING);
}
void loop() {
}
void test2() {
deg1 = 90;
angle = (10000/180)*deg1;
delayMicroseconds(angle);
digitalWrite(5, HIGH);
delay(10);
digitalWrite(5, LOW);
}
Code for Bipolar:
int angle, a, b, angle2, deg1, deg2;
void setup() {
pinMode(5, OUTPUT);
pinMode(6, OUTPUT);
attachInterrupt(1, test2, FALLING);
attachInterrupt(0, test, RISING);
}
void loop() {
}
void test2() {
deg1 = 90;
angle = (10000/180)*deg1;
delayMicroseconds(angle);
digitalWrite(5, HIGH);
delay(10);
digitalWrite(5, LOW);
}
void test() {
deg2 = 90;
angle2 = (10000/180)*deg2;
delayMicroseconds(angle2);
digitalWrite(6, HIGH);
delay(10);
digitalWrite(6, LOW); }