A Locally Conformal Finite-Difference Time-Domain FDTD Algorithm For Modeling Three-Dimensional Perfectly Conducting Objects
A Locally Conformal Finite-Difference Time-Domain FDTD Algorithm For Modeling Three-Dimensional Perfectly Conducting Objects
I. INTRODUCTION
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - Akdeniz Universitesi. Downloaded on December 29,2023 at 08:59:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
274 IEEE MICROWAVE AND GUIDED WAVE LETTERS, VOL. 7, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 1997
A. Cylindrical Cavity
The proposed algorithm was employed to calculate the
resonant frequencies of the dominant TE and TM modes
for circularly cylindrical cavities, with heights of 30 cm and
radii ranging from 18 to 26 cm. In each case, the spatial
discretization was chosen to be 3 cm. The results are shown
(2) in Fig. 2 and are compared with those obtained by using the
staircase approximation, as well as with the analytical results.
where, and are the step size along and directions. In the above figure, the legend CFDTD refers to the present
Since all the field values are updated without borrowing conformal FDTD method. The worst case and the average error
from any of the adjacent cells, as is done in CPFDTD, due to staircasing is 8.45% and 3.76%, respectively, while the
the associated stability problems are no longer present in corresponding figure for the present scheme is only 0.3% and
this scheme. However, the stability of this algorithm is still 0.14%.
governed by the nature of the mesh and the choice of the time
step. Numerical experiments have shown that a time step of 50 B. Spherical Cavity
to 70% of the Courant limit associated with the undistorted cell To demonstrate the full three-dimensional capability of the
is adequate to ensure the stability of the algorithm, provided algorithm, two lowest order resonant frequencies of the spher-
that the following conditions are met. ical cavity have been computed. Calculations were carried out
1) The area of the distorted cell (partially filled) is greater for spheres with radii ranging from 14 to 24 cm by using
than 1.5% (for 50% of Courant limit) and 2.5% (for a spatial discretization of 4 cm in size. It is evident that
70% of limit) of the area of the undistorted cell area. this choice of the discretization leads to a relatively coarse
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - Akdeniz Universitesi. Downloaded on December 29,2023 at 08:59:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IEEE MICROWAVE AND GUIDED WAVE LETTERS, VOL. 7, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 1997 275
IV. CONCLUSION
In this paper, we have shown that a simple accurate stable
and locally conformal FDTD algorithm, previously developed
for the 2-D case, can be successfully extended to three-
dimensional geometries. The scheme has been found to be
numerically stable, because the problem associated with bor-
rowing from adjacent cell, as for instance in CPFDTD, is
not present here. Furthermore, the algorithm generates no
spurious solutions and yields results that are considerably more
accurate than those obtained by using the staircasing approach.
There are several attractive features of this algorithm: first, the
bookkeeping involved is relatively simple compared to those
required in other explicit nonorthogonal FDTD schemes. Sec-
ond, an automatic mesh generation procedure can be utilized
Fig. 3. Resonant frequencies of spherical cavities calculated using various in conjunction with this algorithm because the specifications
methods.
for the mesh are not very demanding. Finally, the allowable
time step for stable calculations can be much higher ( order
mesh and, hence, provides a stringent test for the algorithm. of magnitude) than dictated by the smallest-size distorted cell,
Fig. 3 shows the comparison between the resonant frequencies and this can result in a considerable saving of the computation
predicted by the present technique, the analytical results, and time.
those derived by using the conventional staircasing approach. REFERENCES
It can be seen that accurate results are obtained with the [1] K. S. Yee, “Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems in-
CFDTD method even with the relatively course mesh that has volving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
been employed. The worst and average staircasing errors are Propagat., vol. AP-14, pp. 302–307, May 1966.
[2] A. C. Cangellaris and D. B. Wright, “Analysis of the numerical error
12.96% and 4.8%, respectively, while the same for the present caused by the stair-stepped approximation of a conducting boundary
scheme are only 1.14% and 0.69%, respectively. in FDTD simulations of electromagnetic phenomena,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propagat., vol. 39, pp. 1518–1525, Oct. 1991.
[3] J. F. Lee, R. R. Palandech, and R. Mittra, “Modeling three-dimensional
C. Circular Microstrip Patch discontinuities in waveguides using nonorthogonal FDTD algorithm,”
IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 40, pp. 346–352, Feb. 1992.
[4] T. G. Jurgens and A. Taflove, “Three-dimensional contour FDTD
The last example considered was a probe-fed circular mi- modeling of scattering from single and multiple bodies,” IEEE Trans.
crostrip patch antenna with the following parameters: dielectric Antennas Propagat., vol. 41, pp. 1703–1708, 1993.
constant 4.0, thickness 4.0 mm, and radius 10 mm. The cell [5] N. K. Madsen, “Divergence preserving discrete surface integral method
for Maxwell’s curl equations using nonorthogonal unstructured grids,”
size along the thickness of the substrate was 0.8 mm while it Rep. UCRL-JC-109787, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
was 2.5 mm along the other two directions. The fundamental 1992.
resonant frequency of the patch obtained by using the present [6] M. Okoniewski, J. Anderson, M. Mrozowski, and S. S. Stoutly, “Arbi-
trarily located metal surfaces in FDTD technique,” Progress in Electro-
method, the staircased FDTD and the MoM were, 3.75, 3.68, magnetics Research Symp., Seattle, WA, July 1995, p. 178.
and 3.80 GHz, respectively. The CFDTD result is 1.31% lower [7] C. J. Railton and I. J. Craddock, “Analysis of general 3-D PEC structure
than the one predicted by MoM, whereas the one computed using improved CPFDTD algorithm,” Electron. Lett., vol. 31, no. 20,
pp. 1753–1754, Sept. 1995.
by using the staircased FDTD algorithm is 3.16% lower. [8] J. Anderson, M. Okoniewski, and S. S. Stuchly, “Practical 3-D con-
The difference between the CFDTD and MoM results for the tour/staircase treatment of metal in FDTD,” IEEE Microwave Guided
resonant frequency can be attributed to the fact that the radius Wave Lett., vol. 6, pp. 146–148, Mar. 1996.
[9] S. Dey, R. Mittra, and S. Chebolu, “A technique for implementing the
of the feed probe modeled with the MoM is finite, whereas it FDTD algorithm on a nonorthogonal grid,” Microwave Opt. Technol.
is assumed to be infinitesimal in the FDTD simulation. Lett., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 213–215, Mar. 1997.
Authorized licensed use limited to: ULAKBIM UASL - Akdeniz Universitesi. Downloaded on December 29,2023 at 08:59:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.