Scribd
Upload
41 views4 pages

The General Evaluator Checklist

This document contains a checklist for evaluating various roles in a Toastmasters meeting. It includes sections to evaluate the Sergeant-At-Arms, President, Toastmaster of the Meeting, speakers, Table Topic Master, speech evaluators, Table Topic evaluator, Timer, Ah Counter, Grammarian, and the overall meeting. The evaluator is to check that each role fulfilled their expected duties and followed proper procedures. Feedback is also solicited on the quality and delivery of speeches, table topics questions, and reports.

Uploaded by

balamani
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
41 views4 pages

The General Evaluator Checklist

This document contains a checklist for evaluating various roles in a Toastmasters meeting. It includes sections to evaluate the Sergeant-At-Arms, President, Toastmaster of the Meeting, speakers, Table Topic Master, speech evaluators, Table Topic evaluator, Timer, Ah Counter, Grammarian, and the overall meeting. The evaluator is to check that each role fulfilled their expected duties and followed proper procedures. Feedback is also solicited on the quality and delivery of speeches, table topics questions, and reports.

Uploaded by

balamani
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

GENEREAL EVALUATOR CHECKLIST

Sergeant-At-Arms

1) Did the meeting begin on time?


2) Were the 3 golden rules laid out?
3) Did the SAA add energy in beginning?
4) Were standee & banner placed in the right spot?
5) Did white board have details of role players & speakers?

PRESIDENT
1) Did the President strike the gavel at the beginning?
2) Did the President share a positive message to set a good note?
3) Were the guests welcomed?

TMOD
1) A remark on the choice of theme.
2) Did TMOD have relevant materials relating to the theme?
3) Did TMOD lead applause?
4) Did TMOD introduce role players & speakers coming on stage?
5) Did TMOD adhere to time limits and adjust filler materials in
accordance with the time?

Any other remarks:

SPEAKER NO 1 -
Things you liked -

Scope for improvements -


SPEAKER NO 2 -
Things you liked -

Scope for improvements -

Table Topic Master


1) Were the topics chosen too tough?
2) Were topics linked to the theme?
4) Did he motivate speakers and compliment them?
5) Were guests motivated to participate?
6) Were guests invited after club members?

Speech Evaluator 1
1) Was evaluation in line with the objective of the project?
2) Was CRC method followed?
3) Was the speaker left high on a positive note?
4) Were commendations and recommendations specific?

Any other remarks:

Speech Evaluator 2
1) Was evaluation in line with the objective of the project?
2) Was CRC method followed?
3) Was the speaker left high on a positive note?
4) Were commendations and recommendations specific?

Any other remarks:


Table Topic Evaluator
1) Was evaluation of each TT speaker to the point?
2) Were specific suggestions offered?
3) Were speakers left motivated to participate again next time?

Any other remarks:

Timer
1) Was the role explained appropriately?
2) Were cards flashed high and for sufficient duration?
3) Was the report presented appropriately?

Ah counter
1) Was the role explained appropriately?
2) Were specific filler words for each speaker mentioned?
3) Was the Ah Counter attentive during the entire meet?
4) Was the report presented appropriately?

Grammarian
1) Was the role explained appropriately?
2) Was the word of the day, its meaning, usage etc. properly
demonstrated?
3) When presenting the “not so good usage of English” section, were
the names of people omitted?
4) Was the report presented appropriately?
With regards to the overall meeting
1) Did mobile phones ring during the course of the meeting?
2) Were there any emergency entry or exits?
3) Was reference to sex, politics and religion refrained from?
4) Were there any unwanted disturbances from members or
otherwise?
5) How was the energy level of members during the meeting?
6) Was member and guest attendance satisfactory?

You might also like