Kung Fu Against Other Styles
Kung Fu Against Other Styles
1
Question 1
In the formative years of kungfu at the Shaolin temple, were any patterns
learned from visiting martial artists, or did Shaolin kungfu develop
completely independently from other martial arts?
Answer
Shaolin Kungfu was (and still is) not only a source but also a receptacle for
many other martial arts. While it provided inspiration and material for other
arts, it also received their best from them. This process of giving to and taking
from other martial arts have continued from its formative years to the
present time.
The first source of Shaolin Kungfu was the Eighteen Lohan Hands, taught by
Bodhidharma, from which the Eighteen Lohan Fist, the prototype of Shaolin
Kungfu, developed. The Eightten Lohan Hands probably came form yoga
exercises practiced by Bodhidharma in India.
Generals who retired to the Shaolin Temple for spiritual cultivation brought
with them their martial arts, which greatly enriched Shaolin Kungfu. They
introduced many classical weapons as well as military strategies to Shaolin.
These generals might also have introduced the Horse-Riding Stance.
From Taoist masters Shaolin Kungfu learned the Small Universe and the Big
Universe. While these two excellent chi kung exercises never became the
principle training methods in the Shaolin Temple, many Shaolin masters
practiced and valued them highly.
Influences from other martial arts are not necessarily always beneficial.
Karate, which owed much of its material to the Shaolin source, revived free
sparring in Shaolin Kungfu at a time when it was at its worst decay.
Taekwondo, which also owed much of its material to Shaolin, brought in high
kicks. Its influence, especially after Bruce Lee had made kungfu well known
in the West, became so pervasive that for a time many people consider how
good a persons’s kungfu was by how high he could kick!
2
The influence of Western Boxing Siamese Boxing is wide-spread. Today, when
they spar, most Shaolin practitioners, indeed most martial artists of any style,
would bounce about and punch and kick like Western and Siamese Boxers.
The influence is so complete that nowadays when one mentions “san da”, the
image is that of kungfu practitioners with boxing gloves fighting like Boxers
in a boxing ring, forgetting that the term actually means free sparring using
typical kungfu forms.
3
Question 2
Answer
The instructor should give the student full encouragement and help.
But we are not going to let our students enter competitions blindly and be
bashed. As scholar-warriors, we do not enter combat and then hope to win.
We already have won, and enter combat to confirm victory.
There are many benefits derived from both the training and the actual
participation of MMA and other free sparring competitions.There are, of
course, also negatives. But as scholar-warriors, we shall make the negatives
as opportunities for improvement.
An obvious benefit is to restore the glory of kungfu. We are true to our belief
that our kungfu is combat effective, and are ready to prove it. We do not want
to be made a mockery of our philosophy.
We also have no illusion that MMA artists and other free sparring
competitors are formidable. Except for experienced fighters in our school,
many of our students will be badly beaten if they enter free sparring
competitions now. This is not because our kungfu is inadequate, but because
they lack real fighting skills and experience, which are different from
friendly sparring amongst schoolmates.
4
Thus, if our students enter sparring competitions now, not only they will be
defeated but more significantly they will be injured, physically as well as
emotionally. They will lose confidence in themselves as well as in our school,
and have doubts as to what we claim is true.
The Choy-Li-Fatt course and the Kungfu against Other Martial Arts course at
the Winter Camp in January 2012 are excellent for this purpose. If all other
things were equal, Choy-Li-Fatt is the most effective for free sparring
competitions, with or without gloves.
The Kungfu against Other Martial Arts course provides the most effective
fighting skills for handling other martial artists. It represents the
crystallization of my more than 20 years of sparring and actual fighting
experience.
Earlier I mentioned that our students should win free sparring competitions
without sustaining injuries. Many people, including our students, may be
very surprised at this statement. It is because they equate free sparring to
generous exchanges of blows and kicks where injuries are inevitable. This is
random hurting one another, not genuine self-defence. In genuine
self-defence, we do not want to be hit, not even once. Such skills will be
systematically taught at the Kungfu against Other Martial Arts course.
Even after taking these two courses at the Winter Camp, students should not
enter free sparring competitions yet. They should apply their fighting skills in
a 30-Opponent programme. This is a close-door secret in our school that
students have to learn personally from their sifus.
After completing the 30-Opponent programme, students should still not enter
MMA competitions yet. MMA competitions represent high-level fighting.
Students should start modestly, taking part first in local, regional and
national competitions to gain experience and confidence before entering
MMA and international competitions. Even in relatively low-level
competitions, we must be sure of winning before we enter the competitions.
A scholar-warrior does not enter combat and hopes to win, he has already
won and enter combat to confirm victory.
5
Question 3
Are some styles of Kung Fu more suited than others to fighting with Boxers?
If so, which ones and why.
Answer
Yes, if all other things were equal, Choy-Li-Fatt is most suited than other styles
to fighting with Boxers. It is because Choy-Li-Fatt techniques and footwork
are excellent in overcoming Boxing techniques and bouncing about.
As most martial artists today fight like Boxers regardless of what styles they
practice, Choy-Li-Fatt is an excellent choice if one wishes to be combat
efficient. He must, of course, learn from a competent teacher. Unfortunately,
most kungfu teachers today either only teach solo practice for demonstration
or fighting like Boxers.
We shall have a better idea why Choy-Li-Fatt is more suited to fighting Boxers
than other kungfu styles if we examine some examples of how different
kungfu styles typically respond to Boxers’ attack and defence.
On the other hand, the Shaolin practitioner using typical Shaolin strikes
would have difficulty attacking a Boxer. If he attempts to strike a Boxer using
“Black Tiger Steals Heart”, the Boxer would just parry away his punch with
one hand, and hit his exposed head with the other hand. When the Shaolin
practitioner tries to withdraw into a False-Leg Stance to avoid the Boxer’s
strike, the Boxer would bounce in with a rain of hits on the Shaolin
practitioner.
6
The scenario with a Taijiquan practitioner is similar. As a Boxer throws a jab,
a Taijiquan practitioner would typically respond with warding off, using
“Immortal Waves Sleeves”. The Boxer would withdraw his first jab, and
throws a second jab, against which the Taijiquan practitioner would try to
ward off with another “Immortal Waves Sleeves”. The Bower would follow
up with a rain of hits on the helpless Taijiquan practitioner.
Indeed, these are the main reasons why many kungfu practitioners could not
match Boxers, and also why they discard their kungfu techniques and fight
like Boxers.
Does this mean that kungfu is no match for Boxing? Unfortunately, the
answer is yes – for most kungfu practitioners today. Otherwise they would
not perform kungfu only in solo demonstration, but discard it when sparring
and adopt Boxing techniques.
But for those who have a wide understanding of kungfu philosophy, skills and
techniques, the answer is no. They will choose those skills and techniques
that are most suited to overcome Boxers. This is what we are going to do at
the “Kungfu against Other Styles” course during the 2012 Winter Camp.
The big problem for most kungfu practitioners is that there are so many skills
and techniques to choose from, and they do not know what to choose. In fact
many of them do not even know the difference between skills and
techniques. The problem is further aggravated by the fact that typical kungfu
patterns which they normally practice are not suited to fighting Boxers.
But they still need combat skills and need how to use the techniques for
combat. If they don’t, if they only perform the techniques for solo
demonstration, they will still be bashed by Boxers and other martial artists.
Acquiring the skills and learning how to apply the techniques for combat are
what we shall do at the Choy-Li-Fatt course during the 2012 Winter Camp in
Norway.
7
Meanwhile, let us examine how a Choy-Li-Fatt practitioner would typically
respond to a Boxer’s attack. Please bear in mind that while knowing the
philosophy (as explained below) is the first important step, one must practice
and practice to be able to apply the response effectively.
The interesting point is that the same technique can be used for attack or
defence. Indeed, the attack and defence run together harmoniously.
The two arms of the Choy-Li-Fatt practitioner are like two iron rods. If an
opponent attacks, he uses his rods to strike the attacking arms. If the
opponent retreats, he uses his rods to strike the opponent’s arms or body.
8
Question 4
In the film “Ip Man 2” a fight between a boxer named Twister and Ip Man is a
very closely contested affair. Did the film makers portray a plausible
scenario? By this I mean, could the combat efficiency of a skilled boxer nearly
equal that of a very highly skilled Wing Choon Kung Fu master such as Ip
Man?
Answer
My opinion is that the scenario portrayed in the film was not plausible. In the
film Ip Man successfully fought through an ambush of many armed assailants
out to take his life. Not only he saved himself, he also saved his student who
was far less skillful. With this level of skills, Ip Man in the film could easily
beat the boxer.
There is no doubt that a top boxer is very formidable fighter fighting within
his Boxing rules. However, if there are no rules as in a real fight, a skilled
boxer would be no match against a highly skilled Wing Choon master or a
master of any kungfu style.
Even if Boxing rules were followed, which would place kungfu masters in a
huge handicap, they could beat skilled Boxers readily. Indeed, this actually
happened in China in the early 1900s when kungfu masters like Huo Yun Jia
and Wang Zi Ping convincingly beat foreign Boxers by a huge margin.
Even if a kungfu practitioner has to put on gloves and follow Boxing rules, he
still has a bigger range of attack and defence techniques than a boxer by a
huge margin. Hence, it is a blantant excuse to the initiated when some
kungfu practitioners say that they could not fight if they put on gloves.
The fact is that even without the boxing gloves these kungfu practitioners
could not fight because their training is only on solo demonstration and
never on combat. If they have had kungfu combat training, they would be
9
able to fight even when putting on boxing gloves would have much reduced
their fighting potential.
In other words, if both combatants have equal force, speed and fighting
experience, the one using Choy-Li-Fatt techniques would have a bigger
advantage in winning than the other using any other martial art! If the
Choy-Li-Fatt practitioner loses the combat, it is not because of his techniques
or boxing gloves he has to wear, but because of his speed, force, fighting
experience or other factors.
One of the main objectives of the Choy-Li-Fatt course in the Winter Camp of
January 2012 is to realize this special feature of Choy-Li-Fatt in combat – with
or without gloves, and with or without abiding by Boxing rules.
10
Question 5
What are the most crucial elements that distinguish Chinese kungfu from all
other fighting arts?
Answer
Because Chinese kungfu focuses on internal force, whereas other martial arts
don’t, it results in many manifestations. For example, due to internal force,
age, gender and size are not crucial in Chinese kungfu, but this is not the case
in other martial arts. An elderly, fragile-looking lady can be more powerful
and more combat efficient than a young, muscular man, whereas in other
martial arts an older person is normally stronger than a younger person, a
man normally stronger than a woman, and one with big muscles normally
stronger than one who is smaller sized.
The truth is that other martial arts may contribute to the practitioners’
combat efficiency and physical fitness, but not to their health, vitality and
longevity. This does not mean that those who practice other martial arts
cannot be healthy, have vitality and enjoy longevity. They can, but it is due to
other reasons, and not due to their martial art training. On the other hand,
even leaving aside other reasons, just by practicing Chinese kungfu alone
contributes to the practitioners’ health, vitality and longevity.
11
energy flow, a reduction of energy due to physical training detracts from
good health, vitality and longevity. On the other hand, in kungfu training,
energy flow is generated, resulting in practitioners having an increase in both
volume and smoothness of energy flow after the training than before. This
contributes to good health, vitality and longevity.
Internal force training is actually found in all styles of kungfu, though it is not
obvious in so-called external styles! It is taught right at the start of all kungfu
styles – in the form of stance training. It lays the foundation of kungfu, which
is not just strengthening practitioners’ legs as many students erroneously
believe, but a training of energy and mind.
However, genuine kungfu with internal force training is now very rare. Many
kungfu students today not only bounce about like Boxers but also adopt
physical training of other martial arts like weight lifting and rope skipping. It
is like throwing away gems for stones.
12
Question 6
Answer
Past masters could walk down a street and be ambushed by more than 30
armed assailants yet emerged unhurt. As recent as 60 years ago, my sifu, Sifu
Ho Fatt Nam, single-handedly fought off more than 30 armed assailants who
intended to kill his family and burn his house, and of course he and his
family remained unhurt. Today many modern day kungfu masters cannot
even fight against a good Boxer or a Karate blackbelt.
13
Question 7
Which skills should a kungfu student develop to beat a highly skilled boxer?
How to develop these skills? Which strategies would you recommend to apply
in fighting Boxers?
Answer
Some people may be surprised at the above answers. This is probably due to
their confusing skills with techniques.
14
The following tactics with the appropriate skills are useful:
1. Cover and strike
2. Cover, chase and strike
3. Cover, fell and strike
4. Continuous kicks
5. Cover and chin-na
Techniques that are useful in implementing the above strategies and tactics
include the following. The pattern names are in Shaolin terms; Taijiquan
practitioners may use the Taijiquan equivalents.
1. Bow-Arrow Thread Bridge
2. Single Tiger Emerges from Cave
3. Wave Dragon Back to Cave
4. Golden Leopard Speeds through Forest
5. Fell Tree with Roots
6. White Crane Steps on Snow
7. White Ape Holds Branch
8. Double Bows Tame Tiger
9. Happy Bird Hops up Branch
All these strategies, tactics and techniques will be taught at the “Kungfu
against Other Styles” course in the Winter Camp in Janaury 2012 in Norway.
Answering an earlier question I said that for most kungfu practitioners today,
kungfu would not be able to match Boxing. This is because there are so many
techniques in kungfu that these practitioners do not know the most suitable
techniques for this purpose, so they use typical kungfu techniques which are
generally not suitable for fighting against Boxing. More significantly, they do
not have systematic combat training.
15
During my trip to the United States recently, Anthony Spinicchia brought out
the topic of kungfu classics. I mentioned that even when one had access to
the classics, he might not understand them.One reason was that important
information was merely stated in the classics, but not explained.
16
Question 8
Answer
A good strategy is to avoid the opponent’s strength and attack his weakness.
MMA practitioners are all-rounders except chin-na and dim-mark. Hence
applying chin-na or dim-mark on them is recommended.
This strategy can be used if you are good at chin-na or dim-mark, and you are
not wearing gloves. Of course, if these two conditions are not present, you
would not be able to use this strategy.
Another useful strategy is to strike the form if there is form, strike the
shadow if there is no form. The advantage is that you can apply this strategy
regardless of whether you wear boxing gloves or not, but your arms need to
be powerful.
If there is insufficient space for you to move back, you can move to his side or
back, in which case you strike a leopard fist into his ribs, spine or back of his
head. If you do not wish to maim him, instead of striking his vital spot, you
can fell him on his back, simultaneously apply a tiger-claw on his throat.
If he moves back, you chase his shadow and strike your powerful arms on his
body or head.
A third useful strategy is to strike him when he is not prepared for it. When
he is taking you down, for example, dislocate his neck using “Naughty
Monkey Plucks Coconut”, or tear off his groin using “Monkey Steals Peaches”.
17
This will kill or maim him, which of course we would not want to do. Instead
you can grip hard at his throat, using “Golden Cockerel Locks Throat” or his
groin using the same monkey technique. MMA practitioners are not used to
the concept of control. Hence, you must hurt him enough for him to let go of
his attack, but not serious enough to kill or maim him.
18
Question 9
There are several stories of classical kung fu masters and even modern
masters "mixing" together various styles and sets to create combinations.
Examples that I can think of are the Tiger-Crane set of Hoong Ka, Choy Li
Fatt's three progenitor systems, Dong Hai Chuan's Baguazhang students (who
were already accomplished in other arts) and even your own experience (if
my memory is correct) in adding certain hand forms to the One Finger
Shooting Zen set.
- Frederick Chu
Answer
Hoong Hei Khoon was a master of the tiger form. He understood the form
well, and had much experience in using the forms effectively.
His wife, Fong Wing Choon, was a master of the crane form. From his wife,
Hoong Hei Khoon learned the crane form, which he also had much
understanding and experience.
From his understanding and experience, Hoong Hei Khoon found that while
his tiger form was excellent for combat, there were occasions when he could
further improve his combat efficiency by adding a crane form.
For example, instead of using a thrust kick as in “White Horse Presents Hoof”
which was found in his tiger form, he could use an organ-seeking kick as in
“White Crane flaps Wings” which needed less effort, was less conspicuous,
and more deadly.
So he included some crane patterns into his tiger form, resulting in the
famous Tiger-Crane Set. He fully understood what he was doing, and realized
the pro and con of adding crane patterns to his tiger form. He also had much
19
experience of the resulting benefits.
When he sees other martial artists using weights and kick-boxers sparring, he
is impressed. So he incorporates into his school weight lifting as a force
training method and kick-boxing for sparring purposes. He may even call his
art kungfu-do.
20
Question 10
Your courses like Shaolin against other Martial Arts get more and more
amazing though they cover many basic techniques! It is simply mind blowing
that whenever I think “Oh yes I know that”. it turns out to be a big surprise.
Why is that I keep on being amazed, amused and blown away even when
taking so called basic courses?
Answer
The main reason is that I keep improving both the contents and skills of my
teaching. Another reason is that these new courses are devised to meet
expedient needs. The third reason is that due to my wide understanding and
experience, I am able to choose the most suitable material and teach it in a
most effective way for the purpose in question.
Both the techniques and skills in these two new courses are very basic. In
fact, they are of a lower level than the techniques and skills taught in the
basic Shaolin 16 combat sequences and the Taijiquan 12 combat sequences.
21
these skills.
Although the skills and techniques are simple, there is much profundity in
their application. For example, a small difference between using “Bow-Arrow
Thread Bridge” for blocking or for threading can bring a big difference in
result. If you use it for blocking, as many initiated practitioners would do, you
expose yourself to a Boxer’s punches. If you use it for threading, you hit a
Boxer as he launches forward to strike you.
The teaching is systematic. First, students learn to keep a Boxer at bay. Next,
they deflects, not blocks, his strikes. Then they cover him adequately. Only
when students have ensured they are safe, they counter-attack the Boxer.
The teaching is also progressive. First, students practice at low speed and
with little force. Next, they practice at normal speed and with normal force.
Then they practice at high speed and with much force. In their
counter-attack, the progress gradually from striking to felling, to chin-na and
to kicking. With systematic and progressive training, students can benefit in
an hour what others may not obtain in many months of random and
haphazard premature free sparring.
So, although you are an advanced practitioner, you may still be amazed,
amused and blown away by such a basic course. You are amazed, for
example, by the effectiveness of the systematic and progressive teaching
methodology; you are amused by the fact that such simple skills and
techniques can produce better results than sophisticated skills and
techniques, and you are blown away by the transformation of students in
such a short time from a position of uncertainty and nervousness to a
position of confidence and efficiency when facing Boxers and Kick-Boxers.
22
Question 11
With regards to lifting weights to train internal force, as well as just about
any other activity, how does chi relate to the muscles? I know that large
muscles can take a lot of energy to maintain, and that tense muscles can lock
up chi. However, my western mindset tells me that muscles are a necessary
part of moving. Is it possible to move without muscles? Does practicing
Shaolin Kungfu cause one's body to have the optimal amount of muscle, not
too much and not too little? Am I causing myself confusion by combining two
different paradigms?
Answer
You have raised a very interesting point regarding internal force and the use
of muscles. I believe no one has explained this point before. I have not read
anything about it in classics or modern writing. My answer, therefore, is
probably unprecedented. It is based on my experience as well as my
understanding of force training philosophy.
When we say, “Don’t use your muscles” we are speaking provisionally. What
we mean is that we do not tense our muscles. In the same way, when we say
that a person’s energy is blocked, we mean that it is relatively blocked. There
is still some energy flowing.
You are right – muscles are necessary for movement. Even when we use
internal force, muscles are involved. One cannot move without muscles. But
we do not tense our muscles in the way when external martial artists use
muscular strength.
But this does not mean that the muscles are listless. The muscles are also taut,
but we do not use the term “tensed” as it may give a wrong connotation. The
muscles are taut, without being tensed, because they are charged with
flowing energy.
Herein lies the big difference. When one tenses his muscles, they become taut
because energy is locked up in the muscles. Moving the muscular mass with
speed provides muscular strength.
When we use internal force, we relax our muscles and let energy flow
through them. The muscles also become taut, not because of tension but
because they are charged with energy. The flowing energy provides internal
23
force.
The concept may become clearer if we use an analogy. An empty water hose
is listless. It becomes taut when we fill it with pieces of solid ice. This
corresponds to muscular strength.
The water hose can also become taut when we fill it with flowing water. This
corresponds to internal force.
The solid ice in the water hose is “dead”. Its use is limited to making the
water hose taut to produce mechanical strength. After some time it becomes
stale.
The flowing water in the water hose is “alive”. Its use is holistic. Besides
making the water hose taut to produce internal force, it can also be used for
many other purposes wherever it flows to. It is always fresh and constantly
re-charged.
Yes, practicing Shaolin Kungfu or Taijiquan can result in the optimal amount
of muscles. You are not causing confusion. In fact your questions open a new
vantage point concerning muscles, mechanical strength, energy flow and
internal force. It is questions like yours that enable us to understand our arts
more deeply, helping us to obtain better result in less time.
24
Question 12
Sifu, When Buddhism and Kung Fu mingled it was the same in essence as the
traveling yogis of India and Himalaya. And living conditions linked the
student and teacher to a very close connection so that direct transmission
and teaching was guiding the student every step of the way.
Today modern society and life style makes a different challenge for living in
such persistent practice. The Shaolin Temple seems to have changed for
tourist interests, though Wudang Mountain appears to maintain their roots.
(But I don’t really know anything about Shaolin or Wudang, I just look this up
on internet and make my own assumptions.) During the Cultural Revolution
many masters fled to Asia and Indonesia. Are there still teachers and places
for students to go to in order to find this kind of close training?
- Spencermk
Answer
I don’t know of any place today where students and teachers stay together for
life like in the Shaolin Temple or on Wudang Mountain in the past to practice
kungfu and spiritual cultivation. This does not mean there are no such places
today, but I do not know of such places and I don’t think there are.
The closest I knew of was Dr Yang Jwing Ming’s noble project of getting
dedicated students to stay with him in a retreat for 10 years to practice and
revive the greatness of kungfu. I did not follow this project and therefore do
not know of its progress.
Years ago I was offered a place on a scenic mountain as well as fund to build
something like the Shaolin Temple to teach chi kung and Shaolin Kungfu.
(This was even before I taught Taijiquan publicly, so the question of teaching
Taijiquan in this retreat centre did not arise.) I declined this kind offer
because I was not ready to dedicate myself to this secluded task. I preferred,
and still prefer, travelling around the world teaching deserving students
besides enjoying delicious food and seeing beautiful places with my dedicated
students.
Later, Sifu Rama Roberto built a retreat centre on the Blue Mountain in Costa
Rica. At first he wanted to call it the Shaolin Temple, but after discussion with
me, he decided to call it Shaolin Wahnam Centre instead because he didn’t
intend to have any real monks there.
25
Although the Shaolin Wahnam Centre on the Blue Mountain is founded to
preserve genuine chi kung, Shaolin Kungfu and Taijiquan, it is different from
the Shaolin Temple and the Wudang Temple in the past. Besides not having
monks, which would be a basic requirement for a temple, a crucial difference
is that students and teachers do not stay together for life or for a long time at
the Shaolin Wahnam Centre on the Blue Mountain. Although courses are
conducted there throughout the year, different students attend different
courses at different times for different objectices.
My son, Sifu Wong Chun Nga, also thought of setting up a Shaolin Wahnam
Centre in Malaysia. I was not in favour of the idea for economic
considerations. It would be too costly to upkeep. Although many students
come to Malaysia yearly for my intensive and special courses, it would be
more comfortable for them and much cheaper for me to conduct the courses
in luxurious hotels, even when the money for the hotel accommodation were
paid to maintain the centre.
Practitioners at the Shaolin and Wudang temples were monks. They had
renounced all worldly affairs to live a temple life and practice the Shaolin or
Wudang arts to attain Enlightenment.
26
Question 13
I consider my own body/mind the most difficult battlefield and I the most
formidable opponent, and to overcome my own weaknesses has been the
purpose of my entire life! But, why Sifu? Why or how do I or am of a
Warrior’s cast? Why do I take so much pride into standing for what I believe
is trustful and honorable? Why do I am willing to spare my life for it?
- Angel
Answer
Different people will answer the same questions differently, and my answers
are as follows.
An excellent way to accomplish this is to practice the philosophy and arts you
have learnt in Shaolin Wahnam. Why? Simply because the philosophy and
arts in Shaolin Wahnam are meant to train students to become
scholar-warriors.
27
Saying that he himself is his own most formidable opponent has become a
cliché often with the person not really knowing what he means.
But when we examine the saying with some mental clarity, it is often not true
for many people. For many students in Shaolin Wahnam, for example, the
saying is not true.
It is now actually harder for many students to defeat other martial artists in
free sparring competitions than to practice free sparring the way I have been
telling them to, including with an element of threat and undergoing the
30-Opponent programme. The interesting point is that if they put into
practice my advice, not merely listening to it, they will eventually find it easy
to defeat other martial artists in free sparring competitions.
For you too, though the above advice is not meant for you because you have
taken part in and have won many free sparring competitions, your own
body/mind is not your most difficult battlefield and you yourself are not the
most formidable opponent. In my opinion, your body/mind is your easiest
battlefield and you yourself are the easier opponent simply because you have
full control over your body/mind and over yourself.
Still, why do you believe in this saying?As I have mentioned earlier, different
people may give different answers. My answer is that you have been
conditioned to this cliché. Now you can look at it in a new light.
While you should overcome your own weaknesses, it should not be the
purpose of your entire life. There are many other more meaningful and also
more pleasant things to do, like using Wahnam Taijiquan to win international
free sparring competitions and helping people with so-called incurable
diseases to regain good health – noble aims which I believe you have
dedicated yourself to.
28
Question 14
Answer
Hong Kok Beng won the Under-30 division, while Teoh Cheng Keat was the
runners-up. You might have met Teoh Cheng Keat at one of the wedding
dinners. He was a former Muay Thai instructor before he learned from me.
Now he is a successful businessman driving a Mercedes.
In the Veteran division, Cheng Shang Shou was the champion, while Lim
Swee Beng (if I remember his name correctly) was the runners-up. All the
champions and runners-up were from Shaolin Wahnam.
I did not mention this achievement because we did not pay much importance
to winning competitions. In fact I almost had forgotten about it until you
brought it up. Actually we did not specially train for the competition.
Persuaded by the organizers to take part, we just sent four competitors and
all of them became champions and runners-up in their respective divisions.
Another reason why I did not mention it was because I was not really proud
of the achievement as the number of participants was not as large as what
the organizers made it out to be, though on the night of the finals the hall was
29
fully packed with spectators. When I asked the organizers why there weren’t
a lot of participants taking part in an all-style open competition, he told me,
probably jokingly though it was flattering, that many did not take part when
they knew we were competing!
30