Job Fit Sample
Job Fit Sample
Job Fit Sample
John Sample
Customer Service Representative
Prevue HR Systems Inc. © 2023
John Sample
Customer Service Representative
Prevue HR
Assessment Taken: 3/28/2022
Let's learn more about your candidate using science! By taking the candidate's results and comparing it
against a benchmark for the role you're hiring for, we are able to get a sense of their potential fit in that
position. Remember, a benchmark can be carefully adjusted over time to best fit who you are looking for.
To do that, simply reach out to your Success Manager and we will work with you to make any fine-tune
adjustments.
To learn more about the science behind the assessment, EEOC compliance, as well as best practice
information, please visit: https://help.prevuehr.com/best-practice-information
Based on the candidate's results on Abilities, Motivations and Personality, a suitability score will be generated that
indicates job-fit and compatibility. Understanding what the score means is essential to using the Job-Fit report for hiring.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Numbers 10 High
In the Abilities and Motivations sections, the circle provides a quick glance at where a candidate falls on a 1-to-10
number scale. The higher the candidate's result is, the more likely they are to excel under that category. However, while a
higher score may typically seem better, this is not always the case. For example, some jobs may not require an employee
to work well with numbers. An overly high score that exceeds the benchmark, as highlighted in green, could result in
them being bored on the job. This could mean lower job performance and ultimately turnover.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Reactive 3 Organized
In the Personality section, a 10-step opposing scale is used instead, consisting of two contrasting extremes. Whichever
direction the circle leans toward shows the candidate's tendency to exude that personality trait. In addition, an outcome
in the middle means the candidate is likely to behave in both ways depending on the situation.
81%
Overall Job-Fit
In comparison to the average working population, here are John Sample's overall Job-Fit results
as compared to the benchmark for the role of Customer Service Representative. The Job-Fit
should only be weighted one-third of the entire interview process.
Abilities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Numbers 4 High
Shapes 4 High
Motivations 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
People 6 High
Data 2 High
Things 6 High
Personality 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Diplomatic 2 Independent
Cooperative 4 Competitive
Submissive 2 Assertive
Spontaneous 7 Conscientious
Innovative 7 Conventional
Reactive 7 Organized
Introvert 6 Extrovert
Self-Sufficient 7 Group-Oriented
Reserved 6 Outgoing
Emotional 5 Stable
Restless 4 Poised
Excitable 6 Relaxed
Curious what your candidate may be like objectively? After analyzing the results, this is what the Prevue AI
thinks the candidate may be like in a work environment.
Aptitude
John Sample has average ability to work with numbers and shapes but lower than average verbal skills. This means that
John will be competent for many numeric assignments and spatial tasks, but will find any work requiring skill with words
very challenging. John will be able to do simple arithmetic and to work with routine spreadsheets and data tables.
Because the candidate can mentally manipulate shapes and objects reasonably well, they will be able to follow ordinary
diagrams, arrange displays, and estimate space requirements. For any written work, they will require more instruction
and more time. Similarly, when faced with major changes in the workplace, John will need additional time to adapt.
Motivations
John Sample is interested in people and will probably be most happy in a job that involves contact with others. John has
little interest in abstract information, but is well motivated to work with tools or machinery. Although the candidate can
work with technology, they will perform best where they can take advantage of their preference for interpersonal activity.
In a computer context, this individual will do best in direct communication with others via social media, e-mail, and word
processing.
Personality
John Sample has well-balanced desires to compete and to cooperate. This individual will put themself forward in some
situations, but not so far as to compromise team spirit. The candidate will balance their own need for achievement
against the need to maintain good relations with others. Although this individual will usually submit to the will of the
group or more assertive opponents, they will occasionally defend their ideas and promote their own ambitions,
particularly if they feel secure within the group or know the other people well. On the whole, John prefers to avoid rather
than confront conflict. John will use tact and diplomacy to maintain harmony in the workplace.
John Sample prefers to work with proven procedures and practices, and is reluctant to change unless there is a
compelling reason to do so. This is a strong score for many businesses, as it combines the consistency necessary for
smooth operations with the flexibility to meet sudden changes in the marketplace. The candidate works best in situations
that allow for reasonable scheduling and planning, although they can deal with unexpected changes that might disrupt
their plans. John may be frustrated in chaotic work conditions or situations that have little or no structure.
John Sample enjoys the company of other people and can be troubled by extended periods of solitude. Most people
will find this individual to be friendly and personable. John is quick to talk to others and enjoys their attention. While the
candidate can listen effectively when concentrating, their instinct is to be the one doing the talking. John's enthusiasm is
a tremendous advantage when presenting ideas. Though conversational and outgoing, John is also self-reliant and does
not require constant social interaction. In a group setting, the candidate will occasionally command attention, but John is
also comfortable as a quiet observer.
The candidate is sensitive to the emotions of both themselves and others, but this is kept in perspective. Certainly,
inappropriate criticism can upset John Sample's equilibrium, but John is not bothered by the normal give and take of
human relations. This individual is generally calm, and while aware of stress, does not let it stop them from achieving
their goals. John exemplifies an effective combination of emotional awareness without excessive vulnerability. The
candidate tolerates stress without being indifferent to it. Whether required to give a fast response to a crisis or
methodical attention to a routine task, John will work well under most pressures.
Interview Guide
Whether it's your first interview or your twentieth, here are some interview questions speaking directly to
the candidate's results. If your team has more than one hiring manager, this is a great tool to make sure the
flow of the conversation stays on track and to help reduce any individual bias.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
General Abilities 3 High
John Sample's score on General Mental Ability is in the low-average and is below the given benchmark. This implies a
gradual learning pace, and could also mean slower reaction to changing business issues and moderate capacity for
processing information. Routine or repetitive work should be tolerated fairly well. Training and support are
recommended for tasks requiring creative or challenging use of information.
1. What is the best way for you to learn a new office procedure?
2. Describe your preferred work environment.
3. How do you react to sudden change in the workplace?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Words 3 High
With low-average ability for Working with Words, John Sample falls below the given benchmark, but may still be
reasonably competent for many verbal tasks. This level of ability usually translates to moderate performance on word
recognition tasks, such as finding or recording customer names and correcting common spelling errors. However, more
time is necessary for processing written information. Advanced tasks, such as handling correspondence or complicated
paperwork, require training and support.
1. When sending a note to a client, how do you make sure that spelling and grammar are correct?
2. Consider a new, multipart form to be used on the job. If no training was provided, how would you teach yourself to use
the new form?
3. Describe how you would read a manual for safety procedures at work.
People like John Sample usually avoid jobs where they have to spend a lot of time dealing with figures, statistics, or
accounts.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Technology 6 High
John Sample expresses an average level of interest in work that deals with inanimate objects, such as electronic devices,
machinery, tools, and equipment.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Diplomatic 2 Independent
1. Describe a situation when you had to become the team leader. What did you think of that role?
2. Illustrate how you resolved the last customer dilemma you encountered.
3. How did you develop rapport with your coworkers on your last job?
1. There have been occasions when you have had to get your point across to your supervisor. Please explain how you
accomplished this.
2. When you feel strongly about something, how do you go about getting your ideas accepted?
3. Describe the type of coworkers that really annoy you.
Individual Characteristics
Take a look through the microscope and find out how your candidate is like compared to the average
working population. With short detailed snippets, each Prevue scales gives you a better look at your
candidate, independent of the job role.
This score indicates that John is reasonably competent A sten score of three is below the average range of
but slower to learn than the average person. The many workers. With this limited capacity, John is likely
candidate may find assimilating new information to be somewhat lacking in many written language skills.
challenging at times and may have difficulty coping with This could affect the candidate's learning speed. When
time pressures. John's efficiency will increase when under time pressure, John is more likely to make
given ample opportunity to develop suitable skills and mistakes in tasks requiring reasoning with expression or
understand procedures. The candidate may have presentation of written communication.
difficulty with major changes in their working
requirements.
John is in the low-average range for Numerical John is likely to be reasonably competent in mentally
Reasoning. This indicates that the candidate's speed manipulating or visualizing shapes, but may need more
and accuracy is typical of the lower third of their fellow time while working in this medium. When under time
employees in the ability to work with information pressure, the candidate is likely to make more mistakes
derived from simple numbers. than the average person.
John shows an average level of interest in work that John indicates having a below-average level of interest
involves dealing with people. The candidate is likely to in working with data. Individuals like the candidate
prefer employment that involves contact with others usually avoid jobs where they spend time analyzing or
and would not be happy working on their own. compiling and computing figures, symbols, statistics,
and accounts.
John expresses an average level of interest in work that The candidate's diplomatic nature is to encourage or
deals with inanimate objects, such as machinery, tools, persuade rather than to forcefully assert their own
or equipment. Such people are likely to be comfortable views. Individuals like John are likable, considerate, and
in handling goods or equipment, but would not see that cooperative. Being good-natured, the candidate has a
interest being central to their work. talent for pulling people together. However, such
people may avoid important issues.
John can be described as an individual within the team John is a submissive and non-confrontational person.
environment. The candidate is somewhat competitive The candidate is likely to be valued for their service-
and will play hard to win for the good of the team. Such orientated approach.
people may downplay their own achievement to instill
the cooperative spirit.
It is John's nature to be conscious of detail, The candidate sees themself as somewhat conventional.
dependable, and well prepared. As a reliable John can cope with change when necessary, but overall
individual, the candidate will follow rules and will prefer the status quo to change.
established procedures within a traditional setting. John
will probably prefer the status quo to change.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7 6
Although the candidate usually regards themself as Individuals like John show moderate levels of
organized and able to work in a controlled manner, enthusiasm and liveliness, contributing to social
these qualities can be altered in some situations. For interaction without drawing undue attention to
the most part, John will be reliable, working best in a themselves.
planned environment.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7 6
John is happiest working in situations where there is a John can be talkative and outgoing, and prefers some
reasonable amount of contact with others. The variety in work. The candidate likes to choose the
candidate enjoys company and a group environment, situations in which they will take center stage, as they
but occasionally requires time for quiet reflection. are comfortable in the company of others. However,
they do not seek constant attention from others.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5 4
John is stable and calm under normal situations, but John has a tendency to get upset and irritated in
may become apprehensive and emotional when difficult situations. Occasionally it is difficult for the
conditions become unsettled. The candidate is candidate to be objective and rational about situations
generally accepting of people, but with a degree of in which they are personally involved.
caution. Such people are usually stable under moderate
stress.
This is a person who remains calm and relaxed in This level of score suggests that the candidate has
response to normal situations. For the most part, such presented a moderately frank picture of themself on the
people are able to manage their problems without other scales.
undue anxiety. Occasionally, they will not assume the
best of other people and will feel the need to check
their motives. However, any level of suspicion or stress
is likely to be moderate.