1 Notice of Removal With All Exhibits
1 Notice of Removal With All Exhibits
1 Notice of Removal With All Exhibits
Plaintiff,
PY
v,
LAURENC E S. SCHNEIDER
O
STEPHANIE L. SCHNEIDER, et al.. .
C
_____ ___________/
Defendants.
ED
NOTICE OF FILINGD FENDANT 'S NOTICE OF.REMOVAL AND
REMAND TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FI
DEFENDANTS, LAURENCE S.. SCHNEIDERand: STEPHANIE L. SCHNEIDER (the
TI
"SCHNEIDERS"), pro se litigants,_ hereby file their Notice of Filing Defendant's: Notice of
RemovaL and Remand to the United'. States District Court. :for the Smithem District of Florida
ER
(WestPalm Beach) and in accordance with the applicable Florida Rules of Civil Procedure And
C
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby gives notice to the Palm Beach Circuit Court that
A
since the Defendants' September 23, 2020 filing ofa Notice of Removal of the foreclosure case
to the United States District Court, the. Palm Beach Circuit. Court has been divested of
T
jurisdiction~ As a result, no further. proceedings. can be undertaken fa the Palm Beach Circuit
O
Court, until arid unless the case .is remanded back to the Circuit Co:µrt As a_ related case to
N
Laurence Schneider, Stephanie Schneider v. First American Bank, .as successor by merger to
Bank of Cordi Gables, LLC 17..;cv-80728, First American Bank v. Laurence Schneider et al. 17-
cv-,80723, .First America11· Bank v Schneider, Laurence, Stephanie -Schneider, _Jeffrey Marc
FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK, 09/23/202 0 06:59:37 PM
Herman, Unknown Tenants, The Oaks at Boca Raton Property Owners Association 502016-CA-:
009292. The cases which are assigned to Judge Middlebrooks as such in accordance with Local
Rule 3.8 and expect to be assigned to the Honorable Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. This court
has been divested of subject matter jurisdiction to enforce the Order Granting First American
Bank's Issuance for Writ of Possession executed by Judge Lisa Small on September 04, 2020
PY
See [D.E. 589]; and the most recent Order granting Motion for Deficiency Judgment executed by
Judge Samantha Schosberg-Feuer entered September 22, 2020 See [D.E. 592] and the Final
O
Judgement Order granted on September 22, 2020. See [D.E. 593]
C
As this Court is aware, both Defendants Laurence Schneider and Stephanie Schneider
ED
have asserted under penalty of perjury that the Order which attorney Henry Bolz had purportedly
received via U.S. Mail [See Exhibit "33"] and in which attorney Bolz had certified to the United
FI
States Federal District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks in which he claimed was our response
TI
to Judge Middlebrooks June 13, 2017 Order to Show Cause was a forgery.
ER
Furthermore, in the event the case is remanded back to this Court, this Court is obligated
to comply with 28 U.S. Code §1447. Procedure after removal, See [D.E. 543], as was directed by
C
Clerk of Court, Steven M. Larimore, See [D.E.539]. Pursuant to the June 26, 2017 Motion for
A
Summary Judgment transcript. See Exhibit "21" of First American Bank's Motion for Sanction
T
served but not filed with the Court in the matter of Laurence Schneider v. First American Bank
O
Verified Petition to Set Aside Judgment, Case No. 502019-CA-001016, page 4, lines 8 through
N
25.
"THE COURT: All right ...... One matter that I had noticed in pulling up the
Clerk's docket sheet, and that is the Defendants have moved to remand this to
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida. And although it hasn't
been filed yet. You have to presented me with an order from the United States
District Court remanding the case back to the State Court. So, I--
MR. BOLZ: Yes, ma'am. But-it was removed on June 9th, and it was remanded,
I believe, on the 22nd so, which was last Thursday.
THE COURT: Right. Okay. So, let me hand you your copy.
MR BOLZ: Your Honor, you're welcome to keep it. I have lots of copies on that
note.
THE COURT: Well, As long as its' filed in the court file."
This Court is required to comply with the explicit directions the United States District
Court in which a certified copy of the Federal Court's Order of Remand and filed with this Court
PY
before this Court once again has subject matter jurisdiction.
O
Lastly, neither Defendants Laurence S. Schneider and Stephanie L. Schneider are
C
registered to utilize nor had accessibility to the CM/ECF electronic mail service and thus any
ED
claims or certifications made by Keller & Bolz, LLP of having effectuated service to the
Schneiders, such as was the case with attorney Henry H. Bolz, Iii counsel for Plaintiff, should be
FI
deemed as fraud on the Court.
TI
Respectfully submitted,
ER
- >--.
:--::-=::::--
C
Email: [email protected]
Secondary:
O
Jordyn.schneider [email protected]
N
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has
been served via the Florida Court's E-filing Portal Automatic Email Service
pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516, on this 23 day of
September, 2020, to Aleksandra. Novakovich Gonzalez, Esq.,
PY
([email protected]), Sachs, Sax Caplan, Attorneys for The Oaks at
Boca Raton POA, Inc., 6111 Broken Sound Parkway, N.W, #200, Boca Raton,
O
FL 33487; Geoffrey M. Cahen, Esq.([email protected]) Cahen Law, P.A.,
1900 lades Road, Suite 270, Boca Raton, Florida 33431; and John W. Keller, III,
C
([email protected]), Keller & Mesa, LLP, Attorneys for First American
Bank, 121 Majorca Avenue, #200, Coral Gables, FL 33134.
ED
FI
Laurence Schneider, Pro Se
TI
ER
C
A
T
O
N
• sr•.-.n:..-.
II lllSTRIC:r COl'IU'
1/'i TIit: l,,:-;]fiR.'li 11 1sTRJC1· or :n.um11A (\\'1•111
roK -nu: sutrr
PY
Cuc-No.:
O
COL"RT FOR THE SOln'llEll."'i
J'alolif1 DISTRICT OF n.OIUDA (Wat l'alat
Bfsth)
C
Flt.ED BY_..J,.f...,t:_s_o.c.
ED
sCll:'-IElllER. rL Al. J.NC',rl.11 t. HOl'l I
o£n-.or...Ot'il ct
~O r:f J\A -WP'I\
lltftn d1.11ts FI
'IO PLAl:',"11FF A.',1> AU.Otlll:R L°'"J'ERE.',iE~ PARTIES:
SCllSEJOF.R. In Pn.• r,r, .notkc~ oo m:inc:: 10 ~ mno\W to the Uniled Su:es District Court
fcv ix S..~tr.11>1.;~ct cffforiJ.:i. 11S th: Circwt Co:.i.1 d~s r.o: hol.i ji:ri~ic:tion over the claim(s)
ER
&'.>.I dl'}":11.\?G(s) pr=i::c.!. a.,d in ~i.:,7C.rt \1ould m:e tl:e foll 011ir.g 10-"it:
O:i J11.,e 9,2017. uureo;c S. Sdccidcr :t:Jd S1ep~.:in:c L. Sch:iddi:r, Defc::ubn:s, origir.nlly
C
filed n Rt:nQ,;il "r 11-.e I SLi Cimut Court r;,r P~ B~!i County, Flori~ docketed :i.s the m:ittcr
A
ofFim A1:1rnca... bw.. l.LC. nssu~ by merge: I.'> ~n:ik. of Com! Gables. LLC, Plaintiff"s \'
L3ur:::,e S. &be::!.":' :Ill.;! Ste;,1-.:Jlic L 5¢1:.: 'd "-"
_ , • :iei c::, a.r.:,cr.:u:its, ,,ruch v,:as assigned C:ise No, 50-
lul6-CA.Q09292, file..1 o:iAug~ 17, 201 6..
T
O
N
Filing# 112922406 E-Filed 09/04/2020 01:25:23 PM
PY
Plaintiff,
v.
O
LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER,
STEPHANIE L. SCHNEIDER, et al.,
C
_ _ _n_eri_en-dants_._ _ / ~
ED
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF~'f~T AMERICAN
4
BANK, MOTION FOR ISSUANCE,OF WBIT OF POSSESSION
FI
. ~,A _, .
THIS MATTER came before this Co~~2pmheanng on September 3, 2020, upon
First American Bank and Laurenc-(~aer (representing himself), and being otherwise fully
inform:d of the premises ( a ~ Uiat Stepmnie Schneider did not appear after due notice of
C
ORDERED an~UDGED that Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Possession be and the
same is hereb~TED, except the Court does not issue its directions to the Clerk to act
T
"fodmJlth.~ Clerk is hereb directed to issue a rit of Possession and deliverit to the
O
. Civ.P.1.580 and Fla. R. Civ. P. Form 1.915. The Writ of Possessionsball specify
that the Sheriff sball remove all persons from the property inPalmBeach County, Florida
described as: "Lot 37 of the Fox Hill Estates of Boca Raton, according to the Plat thereof, as
recorded in Plat Book 87, Page 4, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.,"
connnonly known as 17685 Circle Pond Court, Boca Raton, Florida 33496-1002 ("Property"),
Page 1 of2
FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK, 09/04/2020 01 :25:23 PM
Case No. 50-2016'..CA-009292-XXXX-MB
.
'z.
DONE AND ORDERED inWestPalmBeach, PalmBeachCounty, Florida.
. /':
. --~'
016,CA;009292~XXXXa:::D9/D4~020
/~, ..
..
~--
•;?f .
. ..• uc::}s~~n-:.Jud_g~
.
so-:iriis·:.cA-009292-XXXX-i1B
Lisa S._S1t1all
~
Judg_e
PY
0~
O
Copies furnished via email:
G
C
LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER ~
ED
Email: [email protected] ~-.
17685 Circle Pond Court
Boca Raton, FL 33496
~
FI
~;:;:~~:;.f~~=!~.com ~"
TI
ALEKSANDRANOVAKOVICH~(W~Z, ESQ.
Email: foreclosures@ssclawfjrtftco/
Sachs, Sax, Caplan ~- J
C
GEOFF~~~EN, ESQ.
T
Page 2 of2
Filing# 113748977 E-Filed 09/22/2020 11:29:58 AM
DMSIONAH
~~
FIR.ST AMERICAN BANK, as
PY
successor by merger to Bank of
Coral Gables, LLC,
~
Plaintiff,
O
v.
G
C
LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER,
&."o/
~
ED
STEPHANIE L. SCHNEIDER, et al.,
Defendants. ~'\!
_ _ _ _! ~4~
FI
ORDER GRANJIINq.P~TIFF'S,
TI
2020, upon Plaintiff's, First Amcri~Motion for Deficiency Judgment l)JE 533]. The
Court having carefully reviewe"cta~\~idered the Motion, having heard argument of counsel
C
for First American Bank ("F~~rican'') and Defendant, Laurence Schneider (representing
himself), and noting tha~il"odan~ Stopbanie Sclmeider, did not appear although she received
A
due notice of ~aring and this Court attempted to call her twice on the telephone using the
T
mnnber s~%1mmce Schneider but went to voice mail) and being otherwise fully
O
On June 26, 2017, this Court entered a Final Judgment of Foreclosure against both
Defendants, Laurence Schneider and Stephanie Schneider (collectively the "Schneiders") [DE
125]. On July 18, 2020, Defendants appealed the Judgment [DE 134 & 141]. By Order dated
October 11, 2017, the appeal filed by Stephanie Schneider was dismissed by Florida's Fourth
Page 1 of5
FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK, 09/22/2020 11 :29:58 AM
Case No. 50-2016-CA-009292-XXXX-MB
District Court of Appeal ·for non-compliance with its order [DE 198]. On July 25, 2018, the
Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the Final Judgment of Foreclosure on all issues except
"to the extent that the [foreclosure] judgment allowed [First American] to simultaneously execute
on the money judgment and foreclose on [the] property." [DE 216]. In accordance with the
opinion of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, this Court, on October 12, 2018, entered an
PY
By Order dated February 11, 2020, this Court granted First American's Mo~ni:o/ees
against both Laurence Sclmeider and Stephanie Sclmeider and awarded First Ame~
O
$426,4 7950 in attorneys' fees, pre-supplem:nlaljudgment interest at r~464.54 in
C
costs and expenses and $48,389.50 in expert witness fees and expens~ 377 at 14]. On
"''
February 26, 2020, this Court entered the Amended Final Judg~f Foreclosure
ED
(Supplemental Judgment)
. ', Stephanie Schneider
[DE 384] against both Laurence4ide?'and
based on the above Order. On March 12, 2020, th.Le ),O~~pealed both Supplemental
~>-- V
FI
Judgments [DE 388]. On September 3, 2020, th(~~District Court of Appeal dismissed the
/4. ";>,
TI
Court scheduled 1he foreclosure ~~ residential properly located at 17685 Circle Pond
Court, Boca Raton, Florida 3~002 ("Properly'') for April I, 2020. This Amended
C
Judgment also provide~~is Court retained jurisdiction: "to enter further orders that are
the schy.d~eclosure sale was cancelled until further order of the Court. See Administrative
O
Ord~2.510-03/20203. By Order, dated June 17, 2020, this Court reset the foreclosure
N
sale of~ Property for August 3, 2020 [DE 449]. On August 3, 2020, the foreclosure sale
was conducted, First American purchased the "Property" by credit bid in the amount of Eight
Hundred Seven Thousand One Hundred and no/lO0ths Dollars ($807,100.00) and the Clerk
issued a Certificate of Sale [DE 519]. No objection to the sale was made, and, on August 17,
2020, the Clerk issued a Certificate of Title to First American as the new owner of the Property
Page 2 of 5
Case No.50-2016-CA-009292-XXXX-MB
[DE 525].
"A plaintiff seeking a deficiency must establish 1) enby of final judgment of foreclosure;
2) sale of the foreclosed property pursuant to the judgment; [and] 3) issuance of a certificate of
title for the property." Aluia v. Dyck-O 'Neal, Inc., 205 So. 3d 768, 773 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2016).
Insofar as a motion for deficiency seeks to enforce or satisfy the final judgment of foreclosure,
there must also be a reservation of jurisdiction in the final judgment Id. at 775. :'\
PY
All these conditions have been satisfied by the record and established b ~
~ expenses.
O
awarded to First American to date, including the principal indebtednessJrld
C
First American is entitled to a deficiency that is "the balance of a l l s ~ ! ' Fed. Deposit Ins.
Co. v. Circle Bar Ranch, Inc., 450 So. 2d 921, 1)22 (Fla. 5" D ~ ) - The fomrula to calculate
ED
a deficiency judgment is the total debt, as secured by t~~juq¼nt of foreclosure, minus the
fair market value of the property as determined by t h ~ ~ i a , 205 So. 3d at 775; Morgan v.
FI
Kelly, 642 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). ~(d~the foreclosure sale is the date at which
TI
the fair market value is determined. Symon f'c~n Capital Corp., 242 So2d 765 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1970). The lender has the initial~ii'-O'fproving the fair market value of the property
ER
was less than the totaldebtde~"t imaljudgmenl. Vantium Capital, Inc. v. Hobson,
137 So. 3d 497, 499 (Fla. 4 th ~ O 14). There is a legal presumption "that the foreclosure sale
C
price equals the fair ma~lue of the property." Id. Once the lender introduces evidence of
A
the foreclosure~ pric.}.-the burden shifts to the borrower to present evidence concerning the
T
properly'st'~value. Id. In the absence of such evidence, the lender has no furlher
O
obligatlo to~prefcluce any further evidence of fair market value and the trial court should enter an
N
t evidence unless the lender gratuitously elects to offer further evidence of fair
During the hearing, First American met its initial burden by demonstrating that an Amended
the sale of the Property took place on August 3, 2020, that the Clerk issued a Certificate of Sale
[DE 519] evidencing that First American purchased the Property by credit bid for $807,100.00,
Page 3 of 5 ·
Case No. 50-2016-CA-009292-XXX X-MB
and that the Clerk issued a Certificate of Title on August 17, 2020 [DE 525]. Once the burden of
proof shifted to the Defendants, Laurence Schneider did not offer any competent or substantial
evidence of the fair market value of the Property on August 3, 2020, despite the Court's
repeated efforts offering him an opportunity to present evidence. Accordingly, pursuant to the
Vantium decision, there is a presumption that the fair market value of the. Property on August 3,
PY
Applying the formula enunciated inAluia and Morgan, the Court finds the amo~~the
deficiency as follows: ~
~
O
Total Amount of the Amended Final Judgment
of Foreclosure (Supplemental Judgment) on C, ~
C
August 17, 2020 $2,34~09
ED
Post-Judgmentlnterestfrom August 18, 2020 to~~~
September 21, 2020 £h..~'1/--"'$'"""'10""'",=06=8:.:....:.4-=5
FI
Total Amount of Deficiency C.~~ $1,547,391.54
TI
ORDERED and ADJUD~Q that the Court will enter a Deficiency Judgment in favor
Schneider, jointly and several~in the amount of $1,54 7,39154. The Deficiency Judgment shall
A
annunts~~ys' fees, costs, and expenses to which Plaintiff is further entitled, to enter
O
f ~ e r s that are proper, and to supplement the rmal deficiency judgment as appropriate.
N
Florida.
Page 4 of 5
Case No.50-2016-CA-009292-XXXX-MB
~_::-----.:.;._
so;2015:_cA;DD9Z92•XXX)M,1B;'_'ii1ll2~2D20 .
.,.__ Samantha:;!!9s_b~~g Feu~_r-- -~~dg~
~~~=-:::.....'=:::::;:;>· ~~---
sii-iciiii.:cA-oh929i~XXXX-MB ogiiinciici
Samantha S_chosberg f.euE;?r
Judge
Copies furnished to:
LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER
PY
Email: [email protected]
17685 Circle Pond Court
Boca Raton, FL 33496
O
STEPHANIE L. SCHNEIDER
Email: [email protected] .
C
17685 Circle Pond Court
Boca Raton, FL 33496 ~
ED
ALEKSANDRANOVAKOVICH GONZALEZ, ESQ. /4. y
Email: foreclos_ [email protected] ~~
~~
'1/
FI
Sachs, Sax, Caplan
Attorneys.for Oaks atBocaRaton ~
6111BrokenSoundParkway, N.W., #200 A'\
TI
/4. ~-
Ermil:[email protected]
Cahen Law, PA
1900 Glades Road, Suite 270
0' "1/
C
JOHN W. KEL~, I I I ~
Email:_jkeller@ enn:;Pc'o~
Keller& M~a,L ~
T
Co~ ,33134
N
Page 5 of 5
Filing# 113749101 E-Filed 09/22/2020 11:30:53 AM
DMSIONA H
~
successor by merger to Bank.of
Coral Gables, LLC,
PY
Plaintiff,
c~
O
v.
C
LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER,
~
STEPHANIE L SCHNEIDER, et al.,
ED
Defendants.
---- ---- -'
.4~
FI
FINAL JUDGMENT
TI
TIIIS ACTION came before 1he C~~~;i ntiff's, First American Banlc, Motion for
Deficiency Judgment bearing a C e ~ Service dated August 27, 2020 [DE 533], the
ER
Amended Final Judgment of Fore~tiru pplemen tal Judgment) dated February 26, 2020 [DE
384], 1he Certificate of Sale~ ust 3, 2020 [DE 519], and 1he Certificate of Title dated
C
August 17, 2020 [DE t~ .Accordingly, this Court having granted the Motion for Deficiency
Judgment by Order dat~tem ber 21, 2020, hereby enters this Final Judgment, whereby it is
A
ORDERED ~ J ~ G E D THAT:
T
severally.
2.Plaintiff, FIRST AMERICAN BANK, 540 Biltmore Way, Coral Gables, Florida
33134, shall recover from Defendants, LAURENCE SCHNEIDER, 17685 Circle Pond
Court, Boca Raton, Florida 33496-1002, Social Security No.: , and
STEPHANIE SCHNEIDER, 17685 Circle Pond Court, Boca. Raton, Florida 33496-
Page 1 of3
5'D
, FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK, 09/22/2020 11 :30:53 AM
Case No.50-2016-CA-009292-:XXXX-MB
1002, Social Security No.: the smn of $1,547,391.54, for which let
execution issue.
3. The Total Amount Due due shall bear interest at the rate of 6.03% per year.
4. The Court previously detennined that Plaintiff, FIRST AMERICAN BANK, is entitled
to reasonable attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred in connection with this action.
Accordingly, the Court retains jurisdiction to detennine the total amounts of attom<; s' fees,
1
PY
costs, and expenses to which Plaintiff is further entitled, to enter further orders ~ + p e r ,
O
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in PalmBeach County,}lQ~
.,c;:-_.::...------ .......
l\ J .
-
C
50;2015:_cA~D09292°XXXX;MB;_J;gJ22)2020 .
.,__ ,~anthaS_;!!!)s_b~rg Feu~_r:.._.,J~dg~
ED
~==::.
5j/,!,~~~9i~XXXX-~B ogiiifi~:----
~<_l
FI .s~;.,~cliosberg f.eUf;!r
G
ER
Email:jk:[email protected]
Laurence S. Schneider ~
A
~ -}'
7
Defendant
17685 Circle P~ri'd~.9urt
T
Email: 1 ~apitalpartners.com
O
N
Stephanie L. Schneider
Defendant
17685 Circle Pond Court
Boca Raton, FL 33496
Email: [email protected]
Page 2 of 3
Case No. 50-2016-CA-0092 92-XXXX-MB
PY
Real Estate & Finance, Inc., S&A
Capital Partners, Inc. Mortgage
Resolution Servicing, LLC and
O
pt Fidelity Loan Servicing, LLC
1900 Glades Road, Suite 270 ~,
C
Boca Raton, FL 3343 lEmail: [email protected] om ~
~
~~ ED
FI
~~
TI
0~~
ER
C
~
A
~
T
~(;j
O
N
Page 3 of3
From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 1:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Activity in Case 9:17-cv-80723-DMM First American Bank v. Schneider et al Notice
(Other)
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CJ.\rl/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to
this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits
PY
attorneys of record and parties in a case (including prose litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of
all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees
apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first
viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not
O
apply.
C
U.S. District Court
ED
Southern District of Florida
Docket Text:
NOTICE by First American Bank re [5] Order to Show Cause (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit
C
9:17-cv-80723-DMM Notice has not been delivered electronically to those listed below and will be
provided by other means. For further assistance, please contact our Help Desk at 1-888-318-2260.:
N
Laurence Schneider
360 Coconut Palm Road
Boca Raton, FL 33432
Stephanie Schneider
360 Coconut Palm Road
Boca Raton, FL 33432
PY
O
C
ED
FI
TI
ER
C
A
T
O
N
2
·•·····- .. .. ,::'~ .. -- ·····-·
.! I
I
I •
'i
<
•
t
r
'
l
l I
. ,'I
'
l
f
PY
O
C
I
I
'
l
ED lI
FI
r,J
~~ I
TI
I
ER
[ l
.
~ -i ~ .,1
C
~ :I "ft i'
!·I r..1 _I
A
,t',-..:~
,,,,--·
\ ,.. \ '. I!
T
-~ 0.
i ·. -~ ~l:
,,
/. .
O
. I
N
~1
1
J
t
Exhibit "33"
Fil ing # 112820114 E-Filed 09/03/202
0 05:58:26 AM
PY
28 \J,.s. Cocle. §:1447; p·rocedure
:after re m ov o~ er el lY
O
l
I
U.S . C0de Notes
C
C
I
I
ED
I
I
.
(~.) In.any case.~emoved. from a -~ . ~ - ••'-•
~u ·. ! _t ~v9I~tqct_~~-~ i::.rn~Y issue
I an·neces~a_ry ·o~q_er~·,,i,:id p"fo:~ess:to
g~i):~~S?.or~~
br.~.i. i~t··.:an -~rop~r parties
FI
I
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 ·stat. 939; Ma'y 24, _1949, ch~ 139, §.84, ·53
Stat.
102;· Pub. L. 88-35 2, title IX~_§ 901, Jlily 2, 1964,-. 78 Stat. 266; Pub. L.
100-
702,··title X,~§ 1016(s;)., ·Nov.19, 1988, 102 Stat; 4.670; Pub. L ·102-198~
.
.§.1Q(h)., pee.~I 1991, 105-S tat: "1626; Plib. L. 104-21
9,_§J,., Oct. 1, 199~,
.110" Stat. 3022; Pub. L. 112-51 ,_§ 2_(:d):, Nov. 9, 2011, 125 Stat. 54.6;~~
PY
.. .. ~~
O
G
C
ED
FI
LaW abciilt..• t.rticles from Wex £. ~
TI
~
A
--~
T
O
N
Fil ing # 112820114 E-Filed 09/03/202
0 05:58:
_ _ _ -•-• -•· - - • __ -••"
"'
26 AM
_..,. ,.,.,. ,.,., • ..,.., ,_!n.,_11;; u.u1 1 I "L.~'-1' LJUu.1\1:;a VUtt :.;qtt :.UJ. .l
0
r-Cli:jt:: 1 Qf.2.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Steven M. Larimore
. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.
Court Administrator! Clerk ofCourt .400Nortli Miami Avenue, Room 8N09
Miami, Florida 33128-7716
. . .. (305)523-5100
PY
15th Judicial Circuit of Flor
Palm Beach co·uiity Courthoida
WestPalmBeacb,FL33401"
use
205 North Dixie Highway~ Room 3.2300.
·
~4;
O
(;()
C
RE: b"istrict Court Case No.: 9;17.:..cv-80723-D
MM
~
·State c~~ ~-!=·N9.: ·502016..:cA..:009292
:.:::s.c. ED
~ :-
FI
§i447, a certified copy 0flh~ £~ urt 'S: Or
ilc r ofRciriimd"mustb•maiieli10
to ihe cierk of i~_e State Court~ , ~V
TI
·
. , · Picasc acknowledge receipt <if the ·o
rd
G~y
ER
~
·cle rk of Circuit and County Cou
·1sth.Judicial Circuit: of Flotjda. rts
PY
Palm Beach County Courthouse· ~· ·
0
205 North Di_xie Highway, Rooin 3.2300
West.Palm Beach, FL 33401
O
RE: District Court Case No.: 9: IFCy--8072
0~PMM G
C
Stat~ C9 ~ Cas? ~o. : 50201°6-CA-009292
~
ED
Dea;Sir/Ma!l\lffi:,
L":";._
Purnuant tO 28 U.S.Co §1_441, :;, ccrjif.iCd CQPY
Of ihc Dis~~~lJ., otRemand niUSI be ina il~
,t-~~ . .
FI
to t!)e Clerk oft ~ State :ur t, . . .
Ple!lsc acknowlcd~c rccc1pt'of the Order
. . .
TI
~~
ofRcmimd.
·By:
A
·n'""~-p-.uty~C::-;-lc_r.,..~-.- - - - - - - - -
On:
:- -- -- -- --
T
O
·Deputy Clerk
·
1
3
CASE NO.: 50-2016-CA-009292-XXXX-MB
4
PY
6 Plaintiff/Pet itioner,
7 vs.
O
8 LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER,
C
9 STEPHANIE L. SCHNEIDER,
10 JEFFREY MARC HERMAN,
ED
11 et al.,
12 Defendant/Res pondents.
FI
13 _______ _______ _ /
TI
14
15
ER
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
16
BEFORE
17
C
19
T
20
Palm Beach County Courthouse
O
21
205 North Dixie Highway
N
22
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
23
24
June 26 th , 2017
25
Exhibit "21"
1 APPEARANCES:
PY
6 Coral Gables, Florida 33134
7 305-529- 8500
O
8 hbolz@k ellerbolz .com
C
9
10 ALSO PRESENT:
ED
11 THE CASE MANAGER
12
FI
13
TI
14
15
ER
16
17
C
18
A
19
T
20
O
21
N
22
23
24
25
1 THEREUPON:
PY
6 MR. BOLZ: Laure nce Schne ider.
7 THE COURT: Schne ider.
O
8 MR. BOLZ: And his wife is Steph anie
C
9 Schn~ ider.
10 THE COURT: Steph anie Schne ider
ED
11 THE CLERK: All right . Laure nce and Steph anie
12 Schne ider.
FI
13
THE COURT REPORTER: I'm here for this case,
TI
19
THE CLERK: Yes, ma'am . She went to get her
T
20 notes .
O
21
THE BAILI FF: She - my judge does the same
N
1 the hall.
2 THE COURT: Thank you, Depu ty.
3 THE BAIL IFF: You got it.
4 THE COURT: All righ t. This is Firs t Amer ican
5 Bank versu s Laure nce Schn eider and Steph anie
6 Schn eider .
PY
And this is plai ntiff 's motio n for
7 summ ary judge ment .
O
8
One matt er that I had notic ed in pulli ng up
9
C
the Cler k's dock et shee t, and that is the
10 Defe ndan ts have move d to reman d this to Unite d
ED
11 State s Dist rict Cour t for the South ern Dist rict
of
12 Flori da.
FI
13
And, altho ugh it hasn 't been filed yet, you
TI
16 Cour t. So, I --
17
C
20
THE COURT: Righ t. Okay . So, let me hand you
O
21 your copy .
N
22
MR. BOLZ: Your Hono r,, you' re welco me to keep
23 it. I have lots of copie s on that note.
24
THE COURT: Well, as long as it's filed in the
25 cour t file.
PY
6 MR. BOLZ: Of the law firm of Kell er and Bolz .
7 THE COURT: I thin k you' ve appe ared in fron t
O
8 of me befo re.
C
9 MR. BOLZ: Yes, ma'a m.
10 THE COURT: Okay .
ED
11 MR. BOLZ: You hand led the init ial moti on to
12 dism iss and moti on to strik e hear ing.
FI
In this - I
13 thin k it woul d have been in Nove mber .
TI
4 happ ened.
5 THE COURT: Oh, Mr. Bolz , befo re - you
PY
6 proce ed, the one thing I do want to see is the
7 notic e of toda y's heari ng. I've looke d throu gh the
O
8 dock et shee ts and coul dn't find it.
C
9 I just want to make sure that there is a
10 notic e of heari ng that was prov ided to the
ED
11 defen dants , who are now pros e.
12 MR. BOLZ:
FI
Let's see. Orde rs spec ial setti ng
13 heari ng enter ed by, or signe d by, Judge Ferra ra
on
TI
21 mail to Laure nce Schn eider and Steph anie Schn eider
N
PY
6 billi ng state ment or any requ est for prod uctio n.
7 Sinc erely , it says Late Schn eider . Not Larry
O
8 Schn eider . I don' t know.
C
9
And so, he has not filed the prom ised notic e
10 with the Cour t that he said he was.
ED
I just want
11 the Cour t to be aware of that.
12
THE COURT:
FI
Okay . He hasn 't filed any notic e
13 on unav ailab ility , nor has he filed a motio n to
TI
17
MR. BOLZ: Your Hono r, first off, just to - we
18 have the origi nal prom issor y note and mortg age.
A
We
19
would sugg est that when we get back to the offic
e
T
20
today we will send these by FedEx with a notic e
of
O
22
THE COURT: I think you can file them with the
23 Cour t now.
24
MR. BOLZ: I'm happy to. I'm givin g you the
25 orig inal.
PY
6 Honor.
7 THE COURT: Okay. Can you - Deputy Cruz, can
O
8 you ask the --
C
9 THE BAILIF F: Sure. Want her to --
10 THE COURT: Case manag er to come?
ED
11 THE BAILIF F: You want .her to come here?
12 THE COURT: Yeah.
FI
13 THE BAILIF F: All right.
TI
20
THE COURT: Do you have the filed with the
O
22 time?
23
THE CASE MANAGER: Did they compl ete a notice
24 of filing ?
25 THE COURT: No.
PY
THE CASE MANAGER: Just write in origi nal note
7 and mortg age.
O
8
MR. BOLZ: Okay . Fine. I will - the fact
9
C
that the origi nal note and mortg age are going to
be
10 filed and we'l l have the
ED
11 THE COURT: Is that suffi cien t?
12 THE CASE MANAGER: Yes.
FI
13 MR. BOLZ: Judge sign it. Okay .
TI
16
MR. BOLZ: You got to write in the style .
17
C
19
MR. BOLZ: All righ t.
T
20
THE CASE MANAGER: Plai ntiff 's file.
O
21
THE COURT: Okay .
N
22
THE CASE MANAGER: The file.
23
MR. BOLZ: We'l l get that done, Your Hono r.
24
THE COURT: Okay .
25
MR. BOLZ: In the mean time, if I could - I
PY
The prin cip le
7 ball oon beca me due at the end of July
of las t yea r.
O
8 Paym ent was n't mad e prio r to tha t.
The ad
C
9 valo rem taxe s have not been paid .
The las t thre e
10 mon thly paym ents und er the mor tgag e
have not been
ED
11 paid .
12 All def ault s are set out in the com
FI
plai nt.
13 The not ices of def ault were duly sen
t to the
TI
14 Sch neid ers. They had an atto rne y for eigh t mon ths,
15 and then he with drew from the ir rep
ER
21
It fluc tuat ed. The prin cip le bala nce -
N
PY
ch - 15 th •
7 And so, they have not paid any inte res
t from Mar ch
O
8 16th •
C
9 And the inte res t for the las t - we' re
talk ing
10 fift een mon ths. It's abo ut - wel l, sixt
y-n ine
ED
11 thou sand , six hun dred fort y -six dol lars
and fift y-
12 two cen ts.
FI
13 And the - unp aid ad valo rem taxe s for
the
TI
16 We are not seek ing any add itio nal cos ts,
like
17 late cha rges or late fees or any thin g
C
like tha t.
18 Jus t the thre e, prin cip le, inte res t, and
unp aid ad
A
PY
requir ed by the statut e.
7 I think that we have submi tted everyt hing that
O
8 you need. And we think we are entitl ed to it. We
C
9 would like to get a - just so you know, Mrs.
10 Schne ider did not sign the note.
ED
11 THE COURT: I know that.
12
MR. BOLZ: Okay. So, we're gettin g - the
FI
13 summa ry - we'd like to get a final judgem ent
TI
19
amoun t - in·tha t amoun t as well as the forecl osure.
T
20
So, we have three orders we'd like to get.
O
21
One is the order granti ng First Ameri can's
N
PY
6 belie ve they stipu lated to - failin g to pay the
7 taxes and failin g to pay the ballo on paym ents.
O
8 MR. BOLZ: Yes, ma'am .
C
9
THE COURT: They were a little --
10. MR. BOLZ: They waffl ed a little bit in the
ED
11 last three month s.
12
FI
THE COURT: On the amoun t?
13 MR. BOLZ: Yes, ma'am .
TI
17 th
9 of April was the last payme nt that was made.
18 And they have not come up with anyth ing --
A
20
MR. BOLZ: To show that they made any furth er
O
22
THE COURT: Okay. Yeah. I've review ed it.
23
And based . on the evide nce. that you'v e subm itted
24
pursu ant to you motio n for final summa ry judge ment,
25 you'r e entit led to a judge ment.
PY
those. And so, if you would?
7
THE COURT: Okay. I'll give this to my case
O
8 manag er, and she will file it with the clerk.
C
9
MR. BOLZ: All right. We have an order
10 granti ng First Ameri can's motion for summa ry
ED
11 judgem ent, which does not have any numbe rs in it.
12 It doesn 't have a forecl osure.
FI
13
It's just a - we think it needs to be a two-
TI
19
MR. BOLZ: Okay. It's - this is for - to --
T
21
MR. BOLZ: I have the final judgem ent of
N
1 today.
2 THE COURT: I unders tand.
3 MR. BOLZ: Throug h today, Your Honor.
4 THE COURT: I unders tand. When do you want to
5 set the sale date?
PY
6
MR. BOLZ: I have - we're ready to go. I mean
7 it's a --
O
8 THE COURT: Well, you know --
C
9
MR. BOLZ: I don't know what the param eters
10 are, Your Honor.
ED
11 THE COURTR: Well, again, I can set it thirty
12
days from today 's date.
FI
Thirty -five, forty, forty-
13
five days. You know, it depend s on adver tising the
TI
14 sale.
15
ER
PY
6 third page rule? I think it might . I just - not
7 enoug h room to --
O
8 THE COURT: Yeah.
C
9
MR. BOLZ: Do you want us to re-do that and
10 put it onto the - I will take some of that secon d
ED
11 parag raph and put it over to the secon d page?
12 THE COURT: Okay. Let me just ask you
FI
13 somet hing.
TI
19
THE COURT: So, why don't you inclu de that in
T
21
MR. BOLZ: Becau se we did. We had moved for
N
PY
6 MR. BOLZ: So, we'll go throu gh the sale and
7 then we'll go throu gh defic iency proce ss.
O
8 THE COURT: Yeah.
C
9 MR. BOLZ: That' s fine.
10 THE COURT: I would feel more comf ortab le.
ED
11 MR. BOLZ: That' s --
12 THE COURT: You know, doing it that way.
FI
13 MR. BOLZ: And again , that' s fine.
TI
19
THE COURT: Tax, reaso nable attor ney's fees --
T
20
MR. BOLZ: And below it too, there 's a secon d
O
21 one.
N
22
THE COURT: Clear ly witho ut a defic iency
23 judge ment?
24
MR. BOLZ: Yes, ma'am .
25
THE COURT: So, you would just go again st him?
PY
envelop es and other notices of sale that the
7 MR. BOLZ: I do not, Your Honor.
O
8 THE COURT: Okay. Let me find out from the
C
9 case manage r how you would go about providi ng it to
10 the clerk, or --
ED
11 MR. BOLZ: It's good exercis e, getting up.
12 THE COURT: Yeah.
FI
13
MR. BOLZ: I don't know if we - do they have
TI
16
THE COURT: Well, if - you can - you can buy
17
C
20
THE COURT: Sorry about this.
O
21
THE CASE MANAGER: Uh-huh.
N
22
THE COURT: All right. Here's the notice of
23 filing.
24 THE CASE MANAGER: Okay.
25
THE COURT: And you'll take care of that,
1 right?
2 THE CASE MANAGER: Yes. I'll make sure.
3 THE COURT: And this is also an order grantin g
4 the summary judgem ent, which we can get the - on
5 that. Now, the clerk issues the final j~dgem ent.
PY
6 But, he only gave me one judgem ent, so he has to
7 provide me with some other --
O
8
THE CASE MANAGER: For today, I will make
C
9 copies of this judgem ent.
10 MR. BOLZ: See if there's envelop es --
ED
11 THE CASE MANAGER: Did you bring envelop es
12 THE COURT: No. That's what I just --
FI
13 THE CASE MANAGER: For mailing purpose s?
TI
it.
18 THE COURT: It's envelop es? And what is the -
A
20 to provide to you?
O
21
THE CASE MANAGER: The notice of sale. He
N
22
needs to provide a copy of the title. And --
23
MR. BOLZ: I'm sorry, what?
24
THE CASE MENGER: A copy of the title - if
25 your firm should win it; a title.
PY
6 THE COURT: To the plaint iff, if the plaint iff
7 purchas es the proper ty.
O
8 MR. BOLZ: Oh, okay.
C
9
THE COURT: There are certain docume nts that
10 you have to provide --
ED
11 THE CASE MANAGER: Right.
12 THE COURT:
FI
To the clerk -
13 THE CASE MANAGER: But you need --
TI
20
THE CASE MANAGER: If you don't have that,
O
21
you'll have to mail that into the clerk's office.
N
22
You have to provide her a set of envelop es for.
23
every, single person on your service list --
24
MR. BOLZ: Okay. That's not a problem .
25
THE CASE MANAGER: For a certifi cate of title,
PY
THE COURT: Go to the clerk 's office and get a
7 listin g.
O
8 MR. BOLZ: And buy envelo pes somew here? I
C
9 mean, I'm happy to fill them out. I'd like to, I
10 want to get this all done and do it today.
ED
11 THE CASE MANAGER: Well, we'll send out the
12 final judgem ent today. But, you'll have to give
FI
13 copies for all of the certif icates for - to the
TI
20
THE CASE MANAGER: That's fine.
O
21
THE COURT: You have to have the clerk send
N
PY
sign. And a confo rmed copy for every one on the
7 servi ce list to recei ve.
O
8
MR. BOLZ: I - do have those copie s, with the
C
9 confo rm list. But, I did - the judge did not sign
10 them. If you want to
ED
11
THE CASE MANAGER: Righ t. Beca use you don' t
12 sign it.
FI
13
THE COURT: That is the confo rm --
TI
20
MR. BOLZ: So, I do have the copie s.
O
21
THE COURT: Perfe ct.
N
22
MR. BOLZ: The copie s are --
23
THE COURT: Are they enoug h thoug h, thoug h?
24 How.m any?
25
THE CASE MANAGER: How big is your servi ce
1 list?
2 MR. BOLZ: One. Well, there' s three.
3 THE COURT: There 's one, two three.
4 MR. BOLZ: It was three.
5 THE COURT: Three.
PY
6 MR. BOLZ: The two Schne iders, and there 's the
·7
homeo wner's assoc iation and then one more for -
O
8 self.
C
9 THE COURT: Okay.
10 THE CASE MANAGER: Uh-huh .
ED
11 MR. BOLZ: I_ only have one, two, three.
12 THE COURT: Okay.
FI
13
MR. BOLZ: Okay. One, two, three. If I could
TI
or not?
16
THE CASE MANAGER: No. I'm sorry. The clerk
17
C
20
MR. BOLZ: Okay. All right.
O
21
THE COURT: So, let's take this.
N
22
MR. BOLZ: So, I got - I'm short one of each
23
of these, becaus e I didn't keep one for mysel f.
24
THE CASE MANAGER: Okay.
25
MR. BOLZ: I have three of those, and I need -
1 Mr. and Mrs. Schn eider prob ably shou ld get them
2 sepa ratel y, since they 're now work ing. And they go
3 in one enve lope. I --
4 THE CASE MANAGER: It depen ds --
5
MR. BOLZ: They 're at the same addr ess.
6
PY
THE CASE MANAGER: It depen ds on your servi ce
7 list.
O
8
MR. BOLZ: They 're at the same addr ess.
C
9 They 're at the same addr ess.
10 THE CASE MANAGER: If you have liste d them
ED
11 indiv idua lly, then they shou ld recei ve them
12 indiv idua lly.
FI
13
MR. BOLZ: Yes. Then they shou ld.
TI
16
MR. BOLZ: In sepa rate enve lopes . No, no.
17
C
19
THE COURT: This is the orde r, this is th~
T
21
THE CASE MANAGER: So, in - so, there shou ld
N
PY
6 THE COURT: Okay.
7 MR. BOLZ: Thank you very much. I - but I can
O
8 send in sets of envelopes to the clerk?
C
9 THE CASE MANGER: Yes.
10 MR. BOLZ: We'll get that done today. I
ED
11 understand --
12 THE CASE MANGER: Yes.
FI
13
THE COURT: You should go down to the clerk.
TI
20
And then, you're going to need, just, envelopes for
O
21
everyone on the services list for the certific~t es,
N
22
and there are three certificat es, the title, the
23 disbursem ents and the sale.
24 THE COURT: Okay.
25 MR. BOLZ: Three sets of envelopes?