UX Feedback Report

AI Marketplace

Strengths Weaknesses Potential Improvements Usability issues/ Visual

Inconsistencies

I found that the ocs option resembled more of a website s assistance

"D " '

section.

A change of name from ocs to elp

"D " "H "

LANDING PAGE seems more intuitive for current users,

making it easier for them to understand its purpose.

Can change the color of ‘For everyone’ to

Great logo and menu bar a gradient that is in consistency with the

placement!
earth image to

Consider making the logo

look more harmonizing
a little larger to catch an eye

Consider changing the font, a modern one .

Also making the text a bit larger

and the buttons

smaller will fit more into the hierarchy of

reading

Consider putting an AI chatbot for user

queries

or contact options. It can even include

suggestions to subscribe to company’s

newsletter.
Great work on the
margins!

The image hover effect implements

in the background seems so effective!

Boxes looks too

big! You can show a relationship between the
Seller,

AI Marketplace and Buyer by using

dashed lines in a diagram form

to make it

look more appealing and interesting.

Also hovering effects can be added to

make it look more interactive.

Somewhat like this

Great approach to catch an eye! ooks

L

amazing !

This is what I was trying to say to do with

th e

text in the hero section.

The bulb image doesn’t complements the

background animation. Try changing the

color

Amazing effect. The website looks of the bulb to a neon color.

interesting!

These images pops out too big,

consider making them a little smaller.

Also, in the whole page there is a use of
vectors so to maintain that harmony
you should use any vector image
instead of these images.

Font size is too

small
Great
Gradients!

The email and subscribe options

should

be a little large. Consider reducing

the size of

‘Stay in Touch’. Also height of this

box can be reduced as it looks

FA ’s section should be

Q really loud.
below Stay in touch
secton

Try creating a gap between website’s

footer

and above content to keep it a littl e

separated.

ifferent color should be chose

D n

for website’s footer to distinguish between

the

contents

MODELS LISTING PAGE

Good work on the

CTA !

The menu bars are so stationary, why?

Text should be a little smaller an
I can’t see any interaction happening when
search bar and filter buttons should

I hover my mouse upon them or even while be a little larger

clicking. Consider putting a change ib color
or zoom effect when hovering

Great work with the

margins again !

Good spacing and organisation o f

The alignment of this context an elements . Also the rounded corners

loo
d

buttons can be centered. Plus, the k

info of cpu/gpu is of no user for the so defined!

user or buyer we can say.

Great work! This can also be

applied to

the footer on the landing page.

The corners of the white background

can

also be rounded to maintai n

visual consistency on the website in

accordance to other elements.

MODELS DETAILS PAGE

Good work on the

CTA !
same as the one on the Model listing
(

page )

The menu bars are so stationary, why?

I can’t see any interaction happening when

I hover my mouse upon them

(same as the one on the Model listing
page )

The subscribe button should be

place d

below the image to look mor e

Great work with the consistent.

margins !
same as the one on the Model listing
(

page )

This information would be

so extra for the user or
maybe of no use

This information may seem unnecessary to

users as users would not want to know th e

variety of application MC s can have.

Q

A user would use this model and get on

to your website only if he/she woul d

wanted to or needed to use it.

Great work! This can also be

applied to

the footer on the landing page.

same as the one on the Model listing
(

page )

The corners of the white background can

also be rounded to maintai n

visual consistency on the website in

accordance to other elements.

same as the one on the Model listing
(

page )

User Experience Evaluation

-The overall design of the website -Potential improvements in

is really great
the visual design are no such

-The vibe of the website is issues in the website. They are

futuristic which compliments only suggestions that can

company’s name.
make the website more

-I found this as a great idea interesting or interactive.

where all API models come -While in some areas

together to form a marketplace.

improvement is needed like

-This will reduce the hassle fro the landing page, the footer

users of searching web every section and logo enlargement

time for finding suitable models. in the hero section.

C
- onsider changing the design
of the landing page. Its should -No usability issues found.

be in consistency with other -However some visual

pages.
inconsistencies were found.

-The name of the DO CS menu -In the hero section, buttons

should be changed to ‘Help’, should be generally a little

‘Query’ or something like it, as

smaller than the main text.

the current name isn’t intuitive Footer section should be in

‘
to users. Rather Docs’ feels like different color for easy

something legal differentiation from the above

documentation. This
text.

can misguide the users.

PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

I
P - The major problem in the UI of the website is that the landing page which is the main page, it doesn’t convey that what the
website is about. It is easier for us young people to understand as they are aware of the technology, but it would be hard for every
audience to understand. Users are not used to the term AI/API models. So they should know that what actually is the purpose of
the website. Also the UI is good but is not intuitive to all users .

S -The types of services that your company is providing are generally found on google with names like image converter,
translator, text to speech etc. The UI of their websites is not that great but it is intuitive to the users because those people know
what the users want. I think that you should change the design of the landing page and make it so that it will be intuitive for the
users. As for the notice the design of other web pages is really good and easy. It will be understood by the old people as well as
the younger generation. So consider making the landing page with that theme as of the other pages.

II
P - The other major problem is that there is no option for the seller to list their models. Everything is placed in
documentation form with an option of docs. But it is important to understand that the information would be unnecessary
‘
for the buyers’ who are there on the website for using these models. Users would want a clean and simple design that does
their work efficiently and effectively.

S -You can make an option in the menu bar which say like- List a model’ or ‘ ‘Seller?’ etc. And there you can put all the
documented info that would be needed by the data scientist, thus giving a smooth service to the buyers.

III P - In the model details page, there is unnecessary information provided in the about section. Like there is no point of
CQs are used. If user comes to your platform, there is a high chance that he/she would
telling about for what things M
be already aware about the fact of the purpose of MCQs.

S- Instead of putting so much information, you can put a slide bar of other API models as YOU MAY ALSO LIKE’ ,
Because of this the user can also browse more related options.
‘

Overall Experience

There is no issue found in usability of the website. The were some visual imbalances found mostly in text size and elements size.

(Maybe that could be happen due to responsiveness). There is no such big problem related to visuals, it’s just in the landing page.
But there is a problem with the experience the users can face. You have to make the design keeping this thing in mind that every
audience is not literate and so used to AI. So consider making a simple and easy design that fulfils the purpose not just looks
great. I tried to give suggestions that can improve the user interaction with the website and make it more interesting and fun.
However, there were some issues that I found ( they are suggested above).

Also, in the model listing page you can add some more API models like PDF to JPG converter and vice versa. My overall
experience with the website was good. I would rate my experience 7/10. 3 for the bugs that I found!

THANKYOU