SEMANTICS

Week 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE

1. What is Semantics?

Semantics (Greek semantikos: significant) is the study of the meaning of linguistic

signs - that is, words, expressions, and sentences.

Question: What is the meaning of the word / the sentence X?”

Semanticists try to answer this question by studying what signs are, as well as how
signs possess significance –that is, how they are intended by speakers, how they
designate (make reference to things and ideas), and how they are interpreted by
hearers.

Definition

Semantics is the Study of Meaning in language. (Hurford, Heasley and Smith,

2007:1).

The meanings of the word can be interpreted in various ways depending on the
situations.

Two important meanings of the word to mean are:

a- to be equivalent to / of, e.g. what is the meaning of this word?

b- to intend to convey, e.g. what do you mean?

2. Types of Meanings

2.1.Speaker meaning and sentence/word meaning

2.1.1.Speaker meaning( ý nghĩa ngữ dụng) (utterance meaning / interpersonal

meaning) is what a speaker means (intends to convey) when he uses a piece of
language.

2.1.2. Sentence meaning / Word meaning (ý nghĩa ngữ nghĩa)

SENTENCE MEANING (or WORD MEANING) is what a sentence (or word) means,
i.e. what it counts as the equivalent of in the language concerned

2.2.Other types of meaning

Other types of meaning are semantic feature, denotative meaning, connotative

meaning, stylistic meaning, affective meaning, collocative meaning, referential
meaning, associative meaning, thematic meaning and social meaning.

3. Approaches to Semantics

3.1. Carol M. Eastman

Semantics is studied from philosophical (pure) and linguistic (descriptive and

theoretical) approaches, plus an approach known as general semantics.

3.2.Gennaro Cherchia and Sally Mc Connel-Ginet

The question of what meaning is, is important to any discipline concerned, directly or
indirectly, with cognition, that is, with how humans process information.

There are the following views of meaning:

a-Referential / Denotational, b-Mentalist / Psychologistic and c-Social / Pragmatic

3.3. Other Views of Meaning

a-The Direct View of Meanings:

WordsàThings

Meanings is a transparent / direct relation between the signifier and the signified.

The Signifier is the word, the sound form. The signified is the object, the thing
designated, the referent.

b-The Indirect View

Wordsà ConceptsàThings
In indirect view of meaning, meaning itself is an indirect association between the
linguistic sign and the information evoked by the sign.

c-Behaviorist, Contextual, Meaning-as-use Views

WEEK 2-SENTENCES, UTTERANCES, AND PROPOSITIONS

1-Utterance:

A Definition

An UTTERANCE (phát ngôn) is any stretch of talk, by one person, before

and after which there is silence on the part of that person.

An utterance is the USE by a particular speaker, on a particular occasion, of a

piece of language, such as a sequence of sentences, or a single phrase, or
even a single word.

2-Sentence:
- A SENTENCE is neither a physical event nor a physical object. It is,
conceived abstractly, a string of words put together by the
grammatical rules of a language. A sentence can be thought of as the
IDEAL string of words behind various realizations in utterances and
inscriptions (words).

We adopt the convention that anything written between single quotation

marks represents an utterance, and anything italicized or (similarly
abstract) part of a sentence, such as a phrase or a word.

e.g. ‘How are you?’ : Utterance

The book is about Hue. : Sentence

- A SENTENCE is a grammatically complete string of words

expressing a complete thought.

We have defined a sentence as a string of words. A given sentence always

consists of the same words, and in the same order. Any change in the
words, or in their order, makes a different sentence, for our purposes.

Helen rolled up the carpet. Different sentences

Helen rolled the carpet up.

Sincerity may frighten the boy. The same sentences

Sincerity may frighten the boy.

Different types of sentences

1-Declarative sentence (câu trần thuật): We are studying semantics.

2-Interogative sentence (câu nghi vấn ): What are we studying?

3- Imperative sentence: (câu mệnh lệnh) Study, Study, Study More.

4-Exclamatory sentences (câu cảm thán): How hard he is studying!

Proposition: Nghĩa / Cấu trúc Ngữ nghĩa Mệnh đề

3-Proposition (mệnh đề nghĩa ) :

Propositions are commonly treated as the meanings or, to use the more standard
terminology, the semantic contents of sentences ( nội dung ngữ nghĩa của câu), and so
are commonly taken to be central to semantics and the philosophy of language.

A proposition is that part of meaning of the utterance of a declarative sentence

which describes some state of affairs.

The state of affairs typically involves persons or things referred to by expressions in

the sentence. In uttering a declarative sentence, a speaker typically asserts /
affirms (khẳng định) a proposition.

Example:

In saying, ‘John can go’, a speaker asserts the proposition that John can go.

Normally, when a speaker utters a simple declarative sentence, he commits

himself to the truth of the corresponding proposition: i.e. he asserts the
proposition (He states clearly and firmly that what is said by him is true). By uttering
a simple interrogative or imperative, a speaker can mention a particular
proposition, without asserting its truth.
To assert: to state clearly and firmly that something is true. (to confirm/ to affirm).

Example:

In saying, ‘John can go’, a speaker asserts the proposition that John can go. In saying,
‘Can John go?’ he mentions the same proposition but merely questions its truth. We
say that corresponding declaratives and interrogatives (and imperatives) have the same
propositional content (nội dung cấu trúc mệnh đề / Nội dung ngữ nghĩa của câu).

Sentences in different languages can correspond to the same proposition, if the two
sentences are perfect translations of each other.

A Structural Definition

A proposition can be considered as a semantic unit consisting of a predicator and its

arguments.

Proposition= (Argument) + Predicator + (Argument)

WEEK 3. REFERENCE AND SESNSE

In talking of sense, we deal with relationships inside the language; in talking of

reference we deal with the relationships between language and the world.

1-Reference:

Definition

By means of reference, a speaker indicates which things in the world

(including persons) are being talked about.

So we have two things: the English expressions (part of the language) and the
things (part of the world). We call the relationship between them reference.

Reference is a relationship between a particular object in the world and an expression

used in an utterance to pick that object out.
The linguistic forms used to refer are referring expressions. The things or persons that
are referred to (by the part of the language) are called referents/ objects/ things.

Reference is a relationship between parts of a language and things outside the

language (in the world).

Reference is a relationship between a particular object in the world and an expression

used in an utterance to pick that object out.

The same expression can, in some cases, be used to refer to different things.
When a common noun is used to refer to many things of the same type in the world,
we have the case of variable reference. e.g. man, this man, book, that book.

When a proper noun is used to refer only to one thing, we have the case of constant
reference, e.g. Vietnam, Hue, the moon, the sun.

We can use different expressions used to refer to the same person, same thing or same
notion, e.g. Morning star and Evening star; Margarite Thatcher and the Iron Lady;
President Ho Chi Minh, Uncle Ho; the General Secretary of Communist Party of
Vietnam in 2015 & 2020, the President of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, người
đốt lò vĩ đại.

2-Sense

The SENSE of an expression is its place in a system of semantic relationships

with other expressions in the language.

On the relationship between sense and reference: the referent of an expression

is often a thing or a person in the world; whereas the sense of an expression
is not a thing at all.

Every expression that has meaning has sense, but not every expression has reference.

In everyday conversation the words meaning, means, mean, meant, etc. are sometimes
used to indicate reference and sometimes to indicate sense.

The referent of an expression is often a thing or a person in the world; whereas the
sense of an expression is not a thing at all.
WEEK 4: PREDICATES

1-Predicator

Definition:

The PREDICATOR of a simple declarative sentence is the word (sometimes a

group of words) which does not belong to any of the referring expressions and
which, of the remainder, makes the most specific contribution to the meaning
of the sentence.

Intuitively speaking, the predicator describes the state or process in which the
referring expressions are involved.

Example:

asleep is the predicator in Mummy is asleep and describes the state Mummy is
in.

love is the predicator in The white man loved the Indian maiden and describes
the process in which the two referring expressions the white man and the Indian
maiden are involved.

wait for is the predicator in Jimmy was waiting for the downtown bus and
describes the process involving Jimmy and the downtown bus.

The predicators in sentences can be of various parts of speech: adjectives (red, asleep,
hungry, whimsical), verbs (write, stink, place), prepositions (in, between, behind), and
nouns (crook, genius). Despite the obvious syntactic differences between these
different types of words, semantically they all share the property of being able to
function as the predicators of sentences. Words of other parts of speech, such as
conjunctions (and, but, or) and articles (the, a), cannot serve as predicators in
sentences.

The semantic analysis of simple declarative sentences reveals two major

semantic roles played by different subparts of the sentence. These are the role
of predicator (played by predicate), illustrated above, and the role(s) of
argument(s), played by the referring expression(s).

Proposition = (Argument )+ Predicator + (Argument)

Examples:

(1) Dennis is a menace.

predicator: menace; argument: Dennice

(2) Fred showed Jane his BMW.

Predicator:show; arguments: Fred, Jane, BMW

(3) Donald is proud of his family.

predicator: proud; arguments: Donald, family

(4) The hospital is outside the city.

predicator: outside; arguments: hospital, city

The basic semantic ingredients of a common type of the simple sentence, as we have
analysed it, are (1) a predicate playing the role of a predicator, and (2) a number of
referring expressions playing the role of arguments. The referring expressions
correspond to actual things, persons, etc. in the world more or less directly, via the
device of reference. The function of the predicate is to describe the specific
relationship between the things, persons, etc. referred to, i.e. to describe how the
things and/or people participate in the particular situation described.

2-Predicate

Definition

Definition: A PREDICATE is any word (or sequence of words) which (in a

given single sense) can function as the predicator of a sentence.

Examples: hungry, in, crook, asleep, hit, show, bottle are all predicates; and, or, but,
not are not predicates.

Notice that predicate and predicator are terms of quite different sorts. The term
predicate identifies elements in the language system, independently of particular
example sentences. Thus, it would make sense to envisage a list of the predicates of
English, as included, say, in a dictionary. The term predicator identifies the semantic
role played by a particular word (or group of words) in a particular sentence.

Example

A tall, handsome stranger entered the saloon.

This sentence has just one predicator, enter, but the sentence also contains the
words tall, handsome, stranger, and saloon, all of which are predicates, and can
function as predicators in other sentences, e.g. John is tall, He is handsome, He
is a stranger, and That ramshackle building is a saloon.

We turn now to the matter of the degree of predicates.

3-Degree of a predicate

Definition:

The DEGREE of a predicate is a number indicating the number of arguments

it is normally understood to have in simple sentences.

Example

Asleep is a predicate of degree one (often called a one-place predicate)

Love (verb) is a predicate of degree two (a two-place predicate)

Comment:

Sometimes two predicates can have nearly, if not exactly, the same sense, but
be of different grammatical parts of speech. Typically in these cases the
corresponding predicates have the same degree, as in the following examples.

Example

Ronald is foolish, Ronald is a fool

Timothy is afraid of cats, Timothy fears cats

My parrot is a talker, My parrot talks

In language there is one special relation, the identity relation. This is the relation
found in equative sentences. In English, the identity of the referents of two
different referring expressions is expressed by a form of the verb be.

Example

George W. Bush is the 43rd President of the United States.

The 43rd President of the United States is George W. Bush.

WEEK 6: PREDICATES, REFERRING EXPRESSIONS, AND

UNIVERSE OF DISCOURSE

1-Generic sentence

Definition

A GENERIC SENTENCE is a sentence in which some statement is made

about a whole unrestricted class of individuals, as opposed to any particular
individual.

Example

The whale is a mammal (understood in the most usual way) is a generic

sentence.

That whale over there is a mammal is not a generic sentence.

Note that generic sentences can be introduced by either a or the (or neither).

Examples:

A whale is a mammal.

Whales are mammals.

The whale is a mammal.

2-Universe of Discourse

Definition

We define the UNIVERSE OF DISCOURSE for any utterance as the particular

world, real or imaginary (or part real, part imaginary), that the speaker
assumes he is talking about at the time.

Example

When an astronomy lecturer, in a serious lecture, states that the Earth revolves
around the Sun, the universe of discourse is, we all assume, the real world (or
universe).

When I tell my children a bedtime story and say ‘The dragon set fire to the
woods with his hot breath’, the universe of discourse is not the real world but
a fictitious world.

WEEK 7: DEIXIS AND DEFINITENESS

1-Deictic Word

All languages do contain small sets of words whose meanings vary

systematically according to who uses them, and where and when they are used.
These words are called deictic words or deictic expressions: the general
phenomenon of their occurrence is called deixis. The word deixis is from a
Greek word meaning pointing.1-

Definition

A DEICTIC word is one which takes some element of its meaning from the
context or situation (i.e. the speaker, the addressee, the time and the place) of
the utterance in which it is used.

The first person singular pronoun I is deictic. When Ben Heasley says ‘I’ve lost
the contract’, the word I here refers to Ben Heasley. When Penny Carter says
‘I’ll send you another one’, the I here refers to Penny Carter.

The linguistic forms used in deixis are called deictic expressions /deictic words
Deictic expressions can be:

1-Person deixis: operating on three part-division: first person – second person – third
person, e.g. I, you, he, she, it..

2-Spatial deixis: here, there, come, go, bring, this, that, these, those….

3-Temporal deixis: yesterday, tomorrow, today, tonight, next week, this week, verb
tenses.

E.g. Free beer tomorrow.

2-Context of Utterance

Definition

The CONTEXT of an utterance is a small subpart of the universe of discourse

shared by speaker and hearer, and includes facts about the topic of the
conversation in which the utterance occurs, and also facts about the situation in
which the conversation itself takes place.

If I meet a stranger on a bus and we begin to talk about the weather (and not about
anything else), then facts about the weather (e.g. that it is raining, that it is warmer
than yesterday, etc.), facts about the bus (e.g. that it is crowded), and also obvious
facts about the two speakers (e.g. their sex) are part of the context of utterances in this
conversation.

Practice

According to the definition of context,

(1) Is the context of an utterance a part of the universe of discourse?

(2) Is the immediate situation of an utterance a part of its context?

(3) Draw a diagram with three circles and label the circles ‘universe of
discourse’, ‘context of utterance’, and ‘immediate situation of utterance’ in such
a way as to indicate what is included in what.

Answers
According to the definition of context,

(1) Is the context of an utterance a part of the universe of discourse? àYes

(2) Is the immediate situation of an utterance a part of its context?-->Yes

(3) Draw a diagram with three circles and label the circles ‘universe of
discourse’, ‘context of utterance’, and ‘immediate situation of utterance’ in such
a way as to indicate what is included in what.

3-Definiteness

Definiteness:

Definiteness is a feature of a noun phrase selected by a speaker to convey his

assumption that the hearer will be able to identify the referent of the noun phrase,
usually it is the only thing of its kind in the context of the utterance, or because it is
the unique in the universe of discourse

The three main types of definite noun phrase in English are: 1-proper names, e.g.
John, Queen Victoria, 2-personal pronouns, e.g. he, she, it, and 3-phrases introduced
by a definite determiner, e.g. the, that, this……

By contrast, expressions like a man, someone, and one are all indefinite.

It follows from the definition of definiteness that all definite noun phrases are
referring expression.

However, The whale in The whale is a mammal is not a definite noun phrase. The
whale here is used in the generic sense. It refers to all the whales.

That book is definite. It can only appropriately be used when the speaker
assumes the hearer can tell which book is being referred to. The personal
pronoun she is definite. It can only appropriately be used when the speaker assumes
the hearer can tell which person is being referred to. The Earth is definite. It is the
only thing in a normal universe of discourse known by this name.

Week 9: WORDS AND THINGS: EXTENSIONS AND

PROTOTYPES
1-Extension

Definition

The EXTENSION of a one-place predicate is the set of all individuals to

which that predicate can truthfully be applied. It is the set of things which can
POTENTIALLY be referred to by using an expression whose main element is
that predicate.

Example :

The extension of window is the set of all windows in the universe.

The extension of dog is the set of all dogs in the universe.

The extension of house is the set of all houses.

The extension of red is the set of all red things.

The notions of reference and extension are clearly related, and are jointly
opposed to the notion of sense.

2-Prototype

Definition

A PROTOTYPE of a predicate is an object which is held to be very

TYPICAL of the kind of object which can be referred to by an expression
containing the predicate. In other words, the prototype of a predicate can be
thought of as the most typical member of the extension of a predicate.

Example

A man of medium height and average build, between 30 and 50 years old,
with brownish hair, with no particularly distinctive characteristics or defects,
could be a prototype of the predicate man in certain areas of the world.
 In a language community as wide as that of English, there are problems with
this idea of prototype, due to cultural differences between various English-
speaking communities.

The kind of definition by pointing is called ostensive definition. It is very

plausible to believe that a child’s first concepts of many concrete terms are
induced by ostensive definition involving a prototype. Obviously, however, not
all concepts can be learned in this way.

Definitions:

The REFERENT of a referring expression is the thing picked out by the use
of that expression on a particular occasion of utterance.

The EXTENSION of a predicate is the complete set of all things which could
potentially (i.e. in any possible utterance) be the referent of a referring
expression whose head constituent is that predicate.

A PROTOTYPE of a predicate is a typical member of its extension.

3-Denotation, denotative meaning

Denotation etymologically derives from the postclassical Latin compound verb de-
noto which conveys the idea of singling out an entity by way of distinctive features.

Denotative meaning is that part of the meaning of a word or phrase that relates it to
phenomena in the real world or in a fictional or possible world. In the meaning
system, denotative meaning may be regarded as “central” or “core” meaning of the
lexical item.

Denotative meaning is set of semantic properties which serve to identify the particular
concept associated with the word in question.

These semantic features help form the “central” or “core” or “conceptual” meaning of
the word.

E.g. bird: <+two-legged><+winged><+egg-laying><+warm-blooded><+beaked>

Man: <+adult><+human><+male>
Woman:<+adult><+human><-male>

Boy:<-adult><+human><-+male>

Girl:<-adult><+human><-male>

Baby<+human><+young>

Week 10: SENSE PROPERTIES AND STEREOTYPES

1-Sense

Definition (partial):

The SENSE of an expression is its indispensable hard core of meaning.

This definition deliberately excludes any influence of context or situation of

utterance on the senses of expressions.

The sense of an expression can be thought of as the sum of its sense

properties and sense relations with other expressions.

For the moment, we will concentrate on three important sense properties of

sentences: the properties of being analytic (analiticity), of being synthetic
(syntheticity), and of being contradictory (contradictoriness).

Definition

An ANALYTIC sentence is one that is necessarily TRUE, as a result of the senses of

the words in it. An analytic sentence, therefore, reflects a tacit (unspoken) agreement
by speakers of the language about the senses of the words in it.

e.g. All elephants are animals.

The truth of the sentence follows from the senses of elephant and animal.

A SYNTHETIC sentence is one which is NOT analytic, but may be either true
or false, depending on the way the world is.

Example: John is from Ireland

There is nothing in the senses of John or Ireland or from which makes this
necessarily true or false.

Analytic sentences are always true (necessarily so, by virtue of the senses of the words
in them), whereas synthetic sentences can be sometimes true, sometimes false,
depending on the circumstances. We now come to contradiction.

Definition

A CONTRADICTION is a sentence that is necessarily FALSE, as a result of

the senses of the words in it. Thus a contradiction is in a way the opposite of
an analytic sentence.

Example

This animal is a vegetable is a contradiction.

Limitation of the notions analytic, synthetic, and contradiction:

Imperative and interrogative sentences cannot be true or false, and so they

cannot be analytic (because they cannot be true), or synthetic, because
‘synthetic’ only makes sense in contrast to the notion ‘analytic’.

The notions analytic, synthetic, and contradiction each apply to individual

sentences. Analyticity, syntheticity, and contradiction are, then, sense properties
of sentences.

Example

That man is human has the sense property of analyticity (or of being analytic). That
man is tall has the sense property of syntheticity (or of being synthetic). That
man is a woman has the sense property of being a contradiction.

2-Necessary and sufficient conditions

Definition
A NECESSARY CONDITION on the sense of a predicate is a condition (or
criterion) which a thing MUST meet in order to qualify as being correctly
described by that predicate.

A SUFFICIENT SET OF CONDITIONS on the sense of a predicate is a set

of conditions (or criteria) which, if they are met by a thing, are enough in
themselves to GUARANTEE that the predicate correctly describes that thing.

Example

Take the predicate square, as usually understood in geometry. ‘Four-sided’ is a

necessary condition for this predicate, since for anything to be a square, it
must be four-sided.

‘Plane figure, four-sided, equal-sided, and containing right angles’ is a sufficient

set of conditions for the predicate square, since if anything meets all of these
conditions, it is guaranteed to be a square.

3-Stereotype

Definition

The STEREOTYPE of a predicate is a list of the TYPICAL characteristics or

features of things to which the predicate may be applied.

Example: The stereotype of cat would be something like: Quadruped,

domesticated, either black, or white, or grey, or tortoise-shell, or marmalade in
colour, or some combination of these colours, adult specimens about 50 cm
long from nose to tip of tail, furry, with sharp retractable claws, etc., etc.

A stereotype is related to a prototype (see previous unit) but is not the same
thing. A prototype of elephant is some actual elephant, whereas the stereotype
of elephant is a list of characteristics which describes the prototype. The
stereotype of a predicate may often specify a range of possibilities (e.g. the
range of colours of typical cats), but an individual prototype of this predicate
will necessarily take some particular place within this range (e.g. black).

Week 11: SENSE RELATIONS (1) IDENTITY AND

SIMILARITY OF SENSE
1. Synonymy

Definition

SYNONYMY is the relationship between two predicates that have the same
sense.

A synonym is a word or phrase that means exactly or nearly the same as another word
or phrase in the same language. Words that are synonyms are said to be synonymous,
and the state of being a synonym is called synonymy.

2-Paraphrse

Synonymy often leads to paraphrase:

Definition

A sentence which expresses the same proposition as another sentence is a

PARAPHRASE of that sentence (assuming the same referents for any referring
expressions involved).

Paraphrase is to SENTENCES (on individual interpretations) as SYNONYMY

is to PREDICATES (though some semanticists talk loosely of synonymy in the
case of sentences as well).

Example:

Bachelors prefer redhaired girls is a paraphrase of Girls with red hair are
preferred by unmarried men

3.Hyponymy

Hyponymy shows the relationship between the more general terms (hypernyms) and
the more specific instances of it (hyponyms). A hyponym is a word or phrase whose
semantic field is more specific than its hypernym. The semantic field of a hypernym,
also known as a superordinate, is broader than that of a hyponym. An approach to the
relationship between hyponyms and hypernyms is to view a hypernym as consisting of
hyponyms.
Definition

HYPONYMY is a sense relation between predicates (or sometimes longer phrases)

such that the meaning of one predicate (or phrase) is included in the meaning of the
other.

Hyponymy implies a superordinate / hypernym and a suborbodinate / hyponym

relation. Hyponymy is a relation of inclusion. For example, red-scarlet.

Red is the superordinate term; scarlet is a hyponym of red (scarlet is a kind of red).

The sense relation between Red and Scarlet is that of hyponymy.

Under the relations of hyponymy and incompatibility, taxonomic hierarchical

structures can also be formed. It consists of two relations; the first one being
exemplified in 'An X is a Y' (simple hyponymy) while the second relation is 'An X is
a kind / type of Y'. The second relation is said to be more discriminating and can be
classified more specifically under the concept of taxonomy.

“HYPONYMY involves us in the notion INCLUSION in the sense that tulip and
rose are included in flower, and lion and elephant in mammal (or perhaps animal).
Similarly, scarlet is included in red. Inclusion is thus a matter of class
membership. The ‘super’ term is the SUPERORDINATE and the ‘lower’ term is the
HYPONYM.” [Palmer, 1981: 85]

4-Entailment

Hyponymy can lead to the relation of Entailment

An entailment is something that logically follows from what is asserted in the

utterance.

E.g.

1: Henry was chewing a tulip ||- Henry was chewing a flower,

2- I saw a boy ||- I saw a person.

3- John boiled an egg ||- John cooked an egg.

4-John killed Bill ||- Bill died

Rule:

A proposition X ENTAILS a proposition Y if the truth of Y follows necessarily from

the truth of X.

A sentence expressing proposition X entails a sentence expressing proposition Y if the

truth of Y follows necessarily from the truth of X.