Rachmaninoff's Subdominant

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 26

Rachmaninoff’s

Subdominant
Presented at the virtual meeting of the
South Central Society for Music Theory
February 2021

Ellen Bakulina, PhD


University of North Texas
[email protected]
Rachmaninoff’s harmony
(Рахманиновская гармония ), later
renamed “Rachmaninoff’s
subdominant,” as described by Viktor
Berkov (1960)
Goals:

1. Contextualize Rachmaninoff’s chord in modern theories of


harmonic function as a functionally mixed harmony
2. Show the chord’s role on larger levels of structure
3. Relate the chord to tonal pairing and broad-scale plagalism
Rachmaninoff’s subdominant resolving
to I and to V: some common
contrapuntal options
Part 1: Some modern theories of harmonic function
Daniel Harrison (1994):
- Scale degrees are understood as bearers of harmonic function
- Root = functional base; third = functional agent; fifth = functional associate
- Functional agents: chordal thirds of the three central triads (T, S, D)
tonic agent: 3/b3 (mi/me); dominant agent: 7/#7 (ti); subdominant agent: b6 (le)

Kevin Swinden (2005):


- SD: subdominant chord with a dominant element (e.g., dominant agent)
- DPD: dominant-reparation chord with a dominant element
- DS: dominant chord with a subdominant element
Tchaikovsky. Overture Romeo and
Juliet (1872).
Rachmaninoff’s subdominant as
a functionally mixed chord
Rachmaninoff. “Loneliness (“Fragment
from Musset”), op. 21 no. 6 (1902),
mm. 6-7. R-S and R-DP
Rachmaninoff. “Loneliness,” mm. 6-7.
Voice-leading graph. R-S locally
prolongs the tonic, R-DP serves as the
pre-dominant chord within the phrase
“Loneliness,” complete graph.
Rachmaninoff
Prelude in C#
minor, op. 3 no. 2
(1892).

A summary of
progressions that
accompany the
le-so-do
ostinato
Part 2: Rachmaninoff’s chord and the pairing of relative keys

Mutability (peremennost’, ladovaia peremennost’):


Russian term approximately corresponding to the concepts of
tonal pairing and directional tonality

Opera Aleko, 1892. One act, libretto by Vladimir Nemirovich-


Danchenko, based on a poem by Alexander Pushkin.
Rachmaninoff’s subdominant as
a modulatory pivot
Rachmaninoff. Prelude in G# minor,
op. 32 no. 12.

R-S as an enharmonic pivot


Rachmaninoff. Aleko, Old Man’s Story.
Summary of progressions with
Rachmaninoff’s chord
Old Man’s Story. Form

(interpreted as a small ternary, A-B-A)


Old Man’s Story
Initial phrase

(Piano reduction
by Bakulina)
Old Man’s Story
Final phrase.

“Ghost pivot”
circled
Part 3: Rachmaninoff’s subdominant and background plagalism
Rachmaninoff. “O Stay My Love,”

op. 4 no. 1 (1892). Form


“O Stay My Love.” Motivic material:
Focal phrase and basic idea
“O Stay My Love”

Mm. 6-22, voice-


leading graph
“O Stay My Love”

Mm. 24-34, voice-


leading graph

This corresponds to
the song’s overall
structure.

Notice the plagal


background,
I-IV-I
Lori Burns
(1995).
Exs. 14, 32, 32

Plagal
Background
structures for
Phrygian
chorales
Suggested plagal background
progressions. An alternative to
Schenker’s authentic background
progressions,
Free Composition, fig. 16
Bibliography

Bakulina, Ellen. 2020. “Tonal Pairing in Two of Rachmaninoff’s Songs.” In Analytical Approaches
to Twentieth-Century Russian Music, edited by Inessa Bazayev and Christopher Segall.
New York: Routledge.
Burns, Lori Anne. 1995. Bach’s Modal Chorales. Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press.
Berkov, Viktor. 1960. “Rakhmaninovskaia garmoniia.” (Rachmaninoff’s Harmony.) Sovetskaia
muzyka, no. 8: 35–43.
Cohn, Richard. 2012. Audacious Euphony: Chromatic Harmony and The Triad’s Second Nature.
Oxford University Press.
Dubovsky, Iosif, Sergei Evseev, Igor Sposobin, and Vladimir Sokolov. 1987 (Reprint of the Fourth
edition, 1955). Uchebnik Garmonii [Harmony Textbook], commonly known as Brigadnyi
Uchebnik [The Brigade Textbook]. Moscow: Muzyka.
Ewell, Philipp. “Harmonic Functionalism in Russian Music Theory: A Primer” Forthcoming in
Theoria
Harrison, Daniel. 1994. Harmonic function in chromatic music: a renewed dualist theory and an
account of its precedents. University of Chicago Press.
Kinderman, William, and Harald Krebs. 1996. The Second Practice of Nineteenth-Century
Tonality. University of Nebraska Press.
Schenker, Heinrich. Free Composition: Volume III of new musical theories and fantasies.
Pendragon Press, 2001.
Swinden, Kevin. 2005. "When functions collide: aspects of plural function in chromatic
music." Music Theory Spectrum 27/2: 249-282.

You might also like