Chapter 7 Primer On Cash Flow Valuation
Chapter 7 Primer On Cash Flow Valuation
Valuation
The greater danger for most of
us is not that our aim is too high
and we might miss it, but that it is
too low and we reach it.
—Michelangelo
Exhibit 1: Course Layout: Mergers,
Acquisitions, and Other
Restructuring Activities
Part I: M&A Part II: M&A Process Part III: M&A Part IV: Deal Part V: Alternative
Environment Valuation and Structuring and Business and
Modeling Financing Restructuring
Strategies
Ch. 1: Motivations for Ch. 4: Business and Ch. 7: Discounted Ch. 11: Payment and Ch. 15: Business
M&A Acquisition Plans Cash Flow Valuation Legal Considerations Alliances
Ch. 2: Regulatory Ch. 5: Search through Ch. 8: Relative Ch. 12: Accounting & Ch. 16: Divestitures,
Considerations Closing Activities Valuation Tax Considerations Spin-Offs, Split-Offs,
Methodologies and Equity Carve-Outs
Ch. 3: Takeover Ch. 6: M&A Ch. 9: Financial Ch. 13: Financing the Ch. 17: Bankruptcy
Tactics, Defenses, and Postclosing Integration Modeling Basics Deal and Liquidation
Corporate Governance
1
To estimate WACC, use firm’s target debt-to-total capital ratio (TC).
2
(D/E)/(1+D/E) = [(D/E)/(E+D)/E] = [(D/E)(E/(E+D)] = D/(E+D) = D/TC; E/TC = 1 – D/TC.
Analyzing Risk
• Risk consists of a
non-systematic/diversifiable and
systematic/non-diversifiable component
• Beta (ß) is a measure of non-diversifiable
risk
• Beta quantifies a stock’s volatility relative
to the overall market
• Beta is impacted by the following factors:
– Degree of industry cyclicality
– Operating leverage refers to the
composition of a firm’s cost structure
(fixed plus variable costs)
– Financial leverage refers to the
composition of a firm’s capital
structure (debt + equity)
• Firms with high ratios of fixed to total
costs and debt to total capital tend to
display high volatility and betas
How Operating Leverage Affects Pretax Profits
Fixed 48 48 48
Variable2 32 40 24
Total Cost of Sales 80 88 72
Key Point: High fixed to total cost ratios magnify fluctuations in financial returns. Why?
Because of the large percentage of revenue in excess of fixed costs that flows to pretax profits.
How Financial Leverage1Affects
Financial Returns
Case 1: No Debt Case 2: 25% Debt to Case 3: 50% Debt to
Total Capital Total Capital
Equity 100 75 50
Debt 0 25 50
Key Point: High debt to total capital ratios magnify fluctuations in financial returns. Why?
Because equity’s share of total capital declines faster than net income as debt’s
share of total capital increases.
Leveraged versus Unleveraged Betas
• In the absence of debt, the ß is called the unleveraged ßu, which is impacted
by the firm’s operating leverage and the cyclicality of the industry in which
the firm competes
• In the presence of debt, the ß is called the leveraged ßl
• If a firm’s shareholders bear all the risk of operating and financial leverage
and interest is tax deductible, leveraged and unleveraged betas can be
calculated as follows:
where t, D, and E are the tax rate, debt and equity, respectively.
Implications:
--Increasing D/E raises firm’s breakeven and increases shareholder risk that firm
will be unable to generate future cash flows sufficient to pay their minimum
required returns.
--Tax deductibility of interest reduces shareholder risk by increasing after-tax
cash available for shareholders.
Estimating a Firm’s Beta
• Regression approach: Regress percent change in firm’s share price plus
dividends against percent change in a broadly defined stock index plus
dividends for last 3-5 years.
– However, this assumes the historical relationship between risk and
return will hold in the future
– If we have reason to believe this is not true, the “bottoms-up”
approach may be appropriate.
• “Bottoms-up” approach: Use a sample of similar firms:1
– Step 1: Select sample of firms with similar size, cyclicality, and
operating leverage (i.e., usually in the same industry)
– Step 2: Calculate average unlevered beta for firms in the sample to
eliminate the effects of their current capital structures on their betas
ßu = ßl / (1 + (1-t) (D/E))
– Step 3: Relever average unlevered beta using the (D/E)* ratio and
marginal tax rate t*of the firm whose beta you are trying to estimate
(i.e., target firm)
ßl = ßu (1 + (1-t*) (D/E)*)
1
This assumes the firm’s future risk/reward relationship is more likely to mirror that of the average
firm in the industry adjusted for financial leverage.
Estimating Brocade Communications Systems’
Levered Beta Using the “Bottoms-Up” Approach
Brocade’s beta estimated using historical data is .88 and its current debt-to-equity ratio is .256.
What is the firm’s estimated levered beta using the “bottoms-up” methodology?
Step 1: Select sample of firms having similar Step 2: Compute Step 3: Relever
cyclicality and operating leverage average of firms’ average unlevered
unlevered betas beta using Brocade’s
debt/equity ratio
Firm Levered Debt / Unlevered Beta2 Brocade’s
Beta1 Equity1 Relevered Beta3
EMC 1.62 .301 1.37 NA
Sandisk 1.44 .285 1.23 NA
Western Digital 1.51 .273 1.30 NA
NetApp Inc. 1.83 .254 1.59 NA
Terredata 1.12 .149 1.03 NA
Average = 1.30 1.50
1
Yahoo Finance (3/14/2014). Beta estimates are based on historical relationship between the firm’s share
price and a broadly defined stock index.
2
ßu = ßl / (1 + (1-t) (D/E)), where ßu and ßl are unlevered and levered betas; marginal tax rate is .4. For
example, EMC (ßu ) = 1.62 / (1 + (1 - .4).301)) = 1.37
3
ßl = ßu (1 + (1-t) (D/E)) using Brocade’s debt/equity ratio of .256 and marginal tax rate of .4, Brocade’s
relevered beta = 1.30 (1 + (1 - .4).256)) = 1.50
Valuation Cash Flow
• Valuation cash flows represent actual
cash flows available to reward both
shareholders and lenders
• Cash flow statements include cash inflows
and outflows from:
– operating,
– investing, and
– financing activities
• GAAP cash flows are adjusted for
non-cash inflows and outflows to calculate
valuation cash flow. Examples include the
following:
– Adding depreciation back to net
income
– Deducting gains from and adding
losses to net income resulting from
asset sales
• Valuation cash flows include free cash
flows to equity investors or equity cash
flow and free cash flows to the firm or
enterprise cash flow
Cash-Based Versus GAAP Accounting:
An Example
Assume:
– A firm has annual revenue of $10 million each year for the next five years,
– It buys a piece of equipment for $10 million in the first year, and
– The equipment is fully expensed in the first year. All other costs are ignored.
Cash-Based Accounting: Yr. 1 Yr. 2 Yr.3 Yr.4 Yr. 5
Revenue 10 10 10 10 10
Cost (10)
Pretax profit 0 10 10 10 10
Profit is $(10) million in the first year and a positive $10 million in each successive year.
GAAP Accounting :
Cost (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)
Pretax profit 8 8 8 8 8
To smooth profitability and better align costs incurred with the period in which the
revenues were actually generated, assume the equipment was depreciated equally
over 5years or $2 million per year. Profitability would be $8 million annually.
Key Point: The timing of cash flows impacts valuation. Valuation cash flow uses cash-
based accounting which indicates the period in which cash inflows and
outflows
actually occur.
Calculating Free Cash Flow
to Equity Investors or Equity Cash Flow (FCFE)
Objective: Adjust GAAP cash flows to estimate cash
available to compensate shareholders.
1
PV of enterprise cash flows is the enterprise value of the firm
2
Excludes cash in excess of normal operating requirements.
3
Cash from operating activities.
4
Cash from investing activities.
Comparing Free Cash Flow
to the Firm and to Equity
• Zero Growth
Model
• Constant Growth
Model
• Variable Growth
Model
Zero Growth Model
• Cash flow next year (i.e., FCFF1, the first year of the
forecast period) is expected to grow at a constant rate.
FCFF1=FCFF0(1+g)
Where
Pn = FCFFn x (1 + gm)
(WACCm – gm)
FCFF0 = free cash flow to the firm in year 0
WACC = weighted average cost of capital through year n
WACCm = Weighted average cost of capital beyond year n
(Note: WACC > WACC m)
Pn = value of the firm at the end of year n (terminal value)
gt = growth rate through year n
gm = stabilized or long-term industry average growth rate beyond year n
(Note: gt > gm)
Variable Growth Model Example
$4 x (1.35)4 + $4 x (1.35)5
(1.18)4 (1.18)5
= $30.5
= $30.50 + $117.65
= $148.15
Determining Growth Rates
• Key premise: A firm’s value can be approximated by the
sum of the high growth plus a stable growth period.
• Key risks: Sensitivity of terminal values to choice of
assumptions about stable growth rate and discount rates
used in both the terminal and annual cash flow periods.
• Stable growth rate: The firm’s growth rate that is
expected to last forever. Generally equal to or less than
the industry or overall economy’s growth rate. For
multinational firms, the growth rate is the world
economy’s rate of growth.
• Length of the high growth period: The greater the current
growth rate of a firm’s cash flow relative to the stable
growth rate, the longer the high growth period.
Choosing the Correct Tax Rate
(Marginal or Effective)