REAHIS Module 2 Notes
REAHIS Module 2 Notes
REAHIS Module 2 Notes
COURSE DESCRIPTION
The course analyzes Philippine history from multiple perspectives through the lens of selected primary sources
from various disciplines and genres. Students are given opportunities to analyze the author’s background and
main arguments, compare different points of view, identify biases and examine the evidence presented in the
document. The discussions will tackle traditional topics in history and other interdisciplinary themes that will
deepen and broaden their understanding of Philippine political, economic, cultural, social scientific, and religious
history. Priority is given to primary materials that could help students develop their analytical and communication
skills. The end goal is to develop the historical and critical consciousness of the students so that they will become
versatile, articulate, broad-minded, morally upright, and responsible citizens. This course includes mandatory topics
on the Philippine Constitution, agrarian reform, and taxation.
Topic Outline
Week Topic
1-2 Meaning and Relevance of History. Distinction of primary and secondary sources;
external and internal criticism; repositories
of primary sources, and different kinds of primary sources
3-6 Content and Contextual Analysis of selected primary sources, identification of
historical importance of the text, and
examination of the author’s main argument and point of view.
7-10 “One past but many histories”. Controversies and conflictingviews in Philippine
History
a. Site of the First Mass
b. Cavite Mutiny
c. Retraction of Rizal
d. Cry of Balintawak or Pugadlawin
11-14 Social, political, economi c, and cultural issues in the PhilippineHistory
Mandated topics:
1. Agrarian Reform Policies
2. The Philippine Constitution 1899(Malolos) Constitution,1935
Constitution, 1973 Constitution
3. Taxation
15-18 Critical Evaluation and promotion of local and oral history,
museums, historical shrines, cultural performances, indigenousrites, rituals, etc.
Prepared by:
Junwil O. Torreon
MODULE 2 MEANING AND RELEVANCE OF HISTORY, PRIMARY
AND SECONDARY SOURCES
WEEK 2
LEARNING GOALS:
• Analyze the context, content, and perspective of different kinds of primary sources and determine how they
affected the history of the Filipino people;
• Develop critical and analytical skills as they are exposed to primary sources.
Narrative or literature
Prepared by:
Junwil O. Torreon
Diplomatic Sources
• are understood to be those which document/ record an existing legal situation or create a
replacement one, and it's these sorts of sources that professional historians once treated as the
purest, the “best” source. Example: Charter
Social documents
Examples: government reports such as municipal accounts, research findings, and documents like these
parliamentary procedures, civil registry records, property registers, and records of census.
Unwritten sources
• these are as essentials as written sources. There are two types: fabric evidence and oral evidence.
• Material evidence, referred to as archaeological evidence is one of the foremost important unwritten evidence.
Examples: pottery, jewelry, dwellings, graves, churches, roads, and others that tell a story about the past.
Oral evidence
Examples of this are tale sagas of ancient peoples and the folk songs or popular rituals from the pre-modern
period of Philippine history.
Prepared by:
Junwil O. Torreon
Criticisms on Primary Sources
External Criticism:
• a less of intellectual type
• examinations of documents (manuscripts, books, pamphlets, maps, inscriptions
and monuments)
• The problem of the authenticity of the document arises more in examining manuscripts
than the printed documents
• Because the printed documents are already authenticated by the editor.
Internal Criticisms:
• A historian must analyze the contents of the documents in order to know the real meaning.
• A historian must be able to understand the literal and real meaning of the
document. This is termed as “Positive Criticism”
• A historian should assess the correctness of the fact by ascertaining whether the author had
the opportunity to know the facts as an eyewitness or not.
Prepared by:
Junwil O. Torreon
historian should be familiar with numismatics, and if monument inscriptions are the main source,
epigraphy.
The following are some questions that one may pose to check on the reliability of the source:
1. How close was the author to the event being studied?
2. When was the account made?
3. Is there bias to be accounted for?
4. Does informed common sense make the account probable?
5. Is the account corroborated by other accounts?
RESOURCES:
1. Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History, (pp. 41-61; 117-170).
2. Howell and Prevenier, From Reliable Sources, (pp. 17-68)
3. Santiago Alvarez, Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a General, (pp. 82-88).
4. Teodoro Agoncillo, History of the Filipino People, (pp. 184-187).
5. William Henry Scott, Prehispanic Source Materials for the Study of Philippine History, (pp. 90-
135).
6. https://library.madonna.edu/primarysources
7. http://www.kasaysayan-kkk.info/cavite-politics-in-a-time-of-revolution/artemio-ricarte-declaration-
march-24-1897
Prepared by:
Junwil O. Torreon
Prepared by:
Junwil O. Torreon