Document
Document
Chapters are peer reviewed by academic editors on their editor panel connected to our internal
manuscript tracking tool, chapters written by editors are sent for external peer review in order to avoid
conflict of interest.
The review is twofold. Once the authors register they need to submit the chapter proposal and keywords
of their chapter-to-be. The editor then reviews the proposal to see whether the chapter will fit into the
scope of the book and whether it is relevant for the book, if the review results are favourable the
authors can proceed to writing their full chapter.
Submitted full chapters undergo a plagiarism check via Intenticate, the academic editor performs review
of the chapter manuscripts and evaluates their scientific merit, and ultimately decides whether they are
suitable for inclusion in the book or not. During the revision, authors work on improving their chapters.
The editor can accept the work, request minor or major revisions, or, if they think that the manuscript is
not following scientific standards, reject it.
If the editor has requested major revision at the time of the first round of review, the editor has only
three options on the second round of review: accept, accept with minor and reject.
Editors have full editorial independence of accepting or rejecting full chapter submissions.
INDEXING
automatic - OAI-PMH (open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting): google scholar,
dimensions/altmetric, BASE, openaire
manual - FTP (file transfer protocol) : web of science, scoupus, pubmed, ebsco
Web of science - book citation index (BKCI), oldest and largest, 472 indexed, 3 rejected
MTS call system – call process is managed through MTS call system, book projects can be filtered based
on the season
MTS call system is an internally developed software/tool that allows setting-up and sending out call for
chapter email campaigns based on predefined ITO settings.
Editor and author acquisitions
Book project catalogue – content team prepares a catalogue of tentative book projects for the upcoming
year
Academic editor acquisition – once the catalogue is completed the commissioning editors proceed to
contact possible academic editors for each book project, they are chosen based on their research areas,
scientific merits and previous publications, external collaborators that contribute, independently and on
voluntary basis
Autor invitation – authors are chosen based on their publishing history and current research field trough
publicly available databases, perspective authors are contacted and invited by email to submit chapter
proposals
email invitation
invitation page
status emails
author registration