TOPIC
TOPIC
S. Sharmas Vali
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National Institute of Technology Karnataka,
1 Introduction
alternatives available. This paper presents the effect of the automotive air-conditioning
system on environment. This work provides essential information about the selection of
suitable alternative air conditioning systems with minimal environmental impact to be
used in automobile industries. This paper also presented various alternative refrigerants to
be used in automobiles in order to reduce the global warming effect of an atmospheric
environment. The significant contribution of the present study is that, it can provide a
road map towards the selection of an alternative air conditioning systems to be used in
automobile industries and the present assessment is essential because it gives the useful
information to the investigators to carry further research work on alternative automotive
air conditioning systems operating with various alternative low GWP refrigerants. This
work also discusses in detail several factors that will affect the performance of the
automotive air conditioning system and hence, this study can be taken as a reference to
carry out further research work with various alternative refrigerants in order to study the
performance of the system.
The various alternative air conditioning systems which can be used for automobiles have
been presented below (Mohamed et al., 2018).
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of VCR air conditioning system (see online version for colours)
Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the air cycle air conditioning system (see online version
for colours)
2.2.1 Air cycle air conditioning system driven by recovered engine exhaust gas
energy
From the past many years’ air cycle refrigeration system is used in aircraft air
conditioning applications. The air cycle system is used in an automobile air conditioning
system due to its eco-friendly nature. This system uses eco-friendly refrigerant such as air
and utilizes engine exhaust gas heat as driving energy. However, this type of air
conditioning system is in the testing phase due to various practical limitations. Demerits
of air cycle air conditioning system are poor COP compared to vapour compression
system, bulky in system size and need for costly components like compressor and turbine.
Figure 3 Schematic diagram of the thermoelectric air conditioning system (see online version
for colours)
The thermoelectric air conditioning system works on the principle of the Peltier effect.
The schematic diagram of this type of system is shown in Figure 3. In this system, the
cooling response is fast however its efficiency predominantly depends on temperature
difference across the thermoelectric device.
Figure 4 Schematic diagram of the ejector air conditioning system (see online version
for colours)
2.4.1 Ejector air conditioning system driven by recovered engine exhaust gas
energy
Ejector based air conditioning system can be powered by utilizing the engine exhaust gas
heat and this system is also eco-friendly in nature. Demerits of the ejector are low COP,
lack of sufficient engine exhaust waste gas heat to run ejector and difficulty of auxiliary
system required for the ejector.
Figure 5 Schematic diagram of the absorption air conditioning system (see online version
for colours)
Figure 6 Schematic diagram of the adsorption air conditioning system (see online version
for colours)
2.6.1 Adsorption air conditioning system driven by recovered engine exhaust gas
energy
This air conditioning system is driven by recovered engine exhaust waste gas energy
since heat is the driving force to produce the refrigeration effect. Activated carbon-
ammonia can also be used as adsorbent-refrigerant pair in this system. Adsorption based
system is more useful for automobiles. This system is also highly eco-friendly in nature.
However, the drawbacks of the adsorption based air conditioning system are very similar
to that of the absorption based system. Demerits of adsorption air conditioning system are
poor COP compared to VCR system, larger system size, high cost of adsorbent beds and
toxicity of working substances like ammonia.
Figure 7 Schematic diagram of metal hydride air conditioning system (see online version
for colours)
2.7.1 Metal hydride air conditioning system driven by recovered engine exhaust gas
energy
The metal hydride air conditioning system has got great attention in automobiles as an
alternative air conditioning system because of the accessibility of engine exhaust waste
gas heat energy. This system is highly eco-friendly in nature. Demerits of this system are
very low COP, system size is bulky for cars and it is not meeting the requirements of
automotive air conditioning. This system is still under the prototype phase.
The most popular and the most widely used air conditioning system for automobiles
is a VCR system. In the VCR system, refrigerant plays a major role in the performance of
the system.
The boiling point and freezing point of the refrigerant should be low so that refrigerant
vaporizes in the ambient room temperature and low freezing point because it should not
freeze during the process or application which may result in damaging the working parts
of the air conditioning system in the automobile industry. Low specific heat and high
latent heat is preferred for the refrigerant. At low temperatures high latent heat increases
the refrigerating effect per kg of refrigerant and also if specific heat is high it will
decrease the refrigerating effect per kg of refrigerant. To run the whole air conditioning
system at a lower cost it is very important that the pressure maintained in the evaporator
and condenser is low enough and also at times to avoid leakages due to high pressure in
the condenser. Hence refrigerant used in the air conditioning system should have low
condensing pressure so that the power required for compression would be small.
Otherwise, the condenser parts have to be designed to withstand high pressure which will
automatically lead to a rise in the capital cost of the equipment.
Refrigerants GWP (100 years) P (W) E (kWh) TEWI (kg CO2) R12 1,800 4,093 7,367 15,264
R134a 1,200 3,827 6,887 30,961 R401A 1,080 3,907 7,033 30,579 R409A 1,440 3,854 6,937
32,841 Source: Wu et al. (2018)
Figure 8
Primary energy consumption of the engine for driving the compressor (see
online version for colours)
It was also noticed that at different mass fractions of R22 the pressure ratio increases with
the speed and it decreases at a lower mass fraction. Ultimately as the pressure ratio
increases compression work also increases. Figure 8 depicts the mentioned results
(Kiatsiriroat and Euakitt, 1997). It was also observed that at different mass fractions of
R22 the pressure ration increases with the speed and it decreases at a lower mass fraction.
Ultimately as the pressure ratio increases compression work also increases. Hence, it was
concluded that the COP of the system increases with the reduction of the mass fraction of
R22.
More specifically it was concluded that suitable and more efficient conditions can be
obtained for the mass fraction of R22 in the range of 20–30%, as it was found that COP
of the system slightly increases when the mass fraction of R22 is less than 30% in spite of
having low atmospheric concentrations and some major advantages over already phased
out R12, unfortunately, HCFCs are greenhouse gases. Around the 1970s, it was found
that the ozone layer was getting damaged by chlorine and a hole had formed due to the
excessive use and venting of CFCs and HCFCs into the atmosphere. Hence due to the
major contribution to releasing greenhouse gases and causing global warming under the
Kyoto protocol, HCFCs also got phased out. Soon R22 was not allowed to be used in the
newly produced machines and by the year 2020, refrigerant R22 will be completely
phased out. The researchers have presented theoretical performance studies on various
HFC blends, HFC/HC blends and HC blends as R22 replacements used in air
conditioning applications (Shaik and Babu, 2017a, 2017b, 2017c, 2018a, 2018b; Shaik
and Setty, 2019; Vali and Babu, 2018a, 2018b). These studies concluded alternative
refrigerants from the volumetric refrigeration capacity, discharge temperature, COP and
GWP point of view.
Figure 9 COP as a function of compressor speed (see online version for colours)
Figure 10 Refrigerant mass flow rate as a function of the compressor speed (see online version
for colours)
Even though R134a does not cause any danger to the ozone layer, it’s a greenhouse gas
with a considerably high GWP potential of 1,430 when released into the atmosphere
(Gasche et al., 2012). Hence many countries have begun to use an alternative and phase
out the use of R134a in the coming years. It is estimated that after the year 2025 use of
R134a refrigerant will be discontinued in new vehicles (Kabeel et al., 2016). For some
widely used refrigerants which got phased out like R12, R22 and which are on the verge
of getting phased out like R134a, some new alternative refrigerants are found.
Unfortunately due to certain limitations in working conditions, some of the alternatives
are still in the experimental phase and some got implemented in the newly produced
vehicles. The following are the proposed alternative refrigerants: R-1234yf, HFC-152a,
and CO2 aka (R744).
Refrigerant R1234yf
Refrigerant R1234yf also known as HFO-1234yf, was jointly introduced in the field of
refrigerants by Honeywell and DuPont companies. It is one such alternative that is getting
quite successful in becoming an alternative for R134a refrigerant. The many researchers
focused on performance of R-134a and R1234yf refrigerants (Akram et al., 2013; Cao et
al., 2017; Daviran et al., 2017; Fortkamp and Barbosa, 2015; Gill and Singh, 2018;
Needham and Westmoreland, 2017; Qi, 2013; Wang, 2014; Zilio et al., 2011). Ever since
the idea R1234yf refrigerant as an alternative for R134a got proposed, R1234yf
refrigerant has become an important area of research for many researchers. As R1234yf
was found to have similar properties as R134a refrigerant many studies and experiments
have been conducted on it to check and compare its working conditions to that of R134a
(Golzari et al., 2017; Javidmand and Hoffmann, 2016).
After conducting many tests and experiments it was concluded by many researchers
that the evaporation heat transfer coefficient of R1234yf is nearly as same as that of
R134a. Also, it was revealed by the experiment that the condensation heat transfer
coefficient of R1234yf was lower than that of R134a by 12–13%. A detailed R1234yf
‘drop-in’ experiment in R134a automotive air conditioning system was performed. It was
observed from the experiment that the R1234yf system can show a better COP than the
R134a system under the same capacity of cooling if condenser and evaporator heat
transfer is increased by 20%and 10% (Lim et al., 2017). It was observed from the
experimental results that the COP and cooling capacity of the R1234yf automotive air
conditioning system was lower by 0.8–2.7% and approximately 4% than that of the
R134a system. The compressor volumetric efficiency of R1234yf was about 5% lower
than R134a because of the higher frictional pressure drop in suction tubes. Based on the
simplified thermodynamic cycle, the performance improvement potential of the R1234yf
automotive air conditioning system was studied. That is, the effect of superheat at
evaporator outlet, subcooling at condenser outlet on system COP and cooling capacity
was the main objective. Before studying the effect of superheating and subcooling
theoretical performance of R1234yf system was compared with that of R134a. A
comparison between both the refrigerant systems is presented in Table 2.
Perform paramete
fy o ) 32 431 iv o
1 e
4
R
it fy it
)
a 4 a
32 a a
%( R
ance rs
1 n D
iv iv
431 32 431
e e %(
1
R R
)
o
R fy
4 it
D R D
n n
a
a
%(
Qc (kW) 2.488 2.696 –7.7 4.503 4.952 –9.1 5.852 6.544 –10.6 Wc (kW) 0.802 0.828 –3.1 1.946
2.015 –3.4 3.466 3.604 –3.8 COP 3.100 3.257 –4.8 2.314 2.457 –5.8 1.689 1.816 –7.0
It is observed from Table 2 that both cooling capacity and COP of R1234yf refrigerant
system were smaller than that of R134a for all operating conditions of a vehicle. The
results were noted from the effect of superheat and subcooling as mentioned above. As
subcooling and compressor performance was fixed so as to observe the superheat effect
on the system, it was found that superheat has very little influence on system
performance. As the system’s COP and cooling capacity were increased only by 2.6%
and 3.7% with the increase in superheat from 1K to 10K.
Hence it was concluded that it would be almost very difficult to match up with the
values of cooling capacity and COP of the R134a system by just increasing superheat
(Lim et al., 2017; Neto et al., 2014). Also, with the increase in superheating it reduced the
mass flow rate of the refrigerant slightly because of low vapour density with higher
refrigerant vapour temperature whereas our preferred R1234yf refrigerant needs high
refrigerant mass flow rate (Qi, 2015). Whereas in the case of subcooling the COP and
cooling capacity were increased by 15% with the increase of subcooling from 1K to 10K.
When compared with the R134a system, it was found that it is possible to match up with
cooling capacity and COP of the R134a system with subcooling. For instance, with a
subcooling of 7K on the R1234yf system, it had the same COP as the R134a system with
3K, which is COP = 2.4.
Even though similar COP and cooling capacity to that of R134a was attained with the
increase in subcooling it comes with a drawback that refrigerant quality at evaporator
inlet was found to be decreased which in return leads to larger enthalpy difference in the
evaporator (Sedrez and Barbosa, 2015; Vaghela, 2017). It was also absorbed that cooling
capacity could increase by 72.8% with compressor volumetric efficiency from 0.55 to
0.95. Power consumption could be reduced leading to the increase in COP if compressor
isentropic efficiency was improved. Hence from all the above-mentioned changes, it can
be concluded that R1234yf can be a better alternative provided some above-mentioned
modifications.
In January 2004, a self-contained unit for off-road construction equipment that featured
an oil-driven compressor that used HFC-152a as a refrigerant was used for the first time.
Several performance studies reported that the performance of R152a, used in automobiles
was comparatively better than R134a (Ghodbane, 1999; Yoo and Lee, 2009; Lee, 2015).
However, utilization of R152a in automobiles is limited due to its slightly flammable
nature and safety problem is still a matter of conversation in the automobile industry.
5 Conclusions
This paper presented a detailed review of the automotive air-conditioning system. From
this study, the following conclusions can be drawn. Although significant research on
various alternative automotive air conditioning systems had carried out from many years
still conventional VCR air conditioning system is the most commonly used system in
automobiles. Several performance studies on various refrigerants (R134a, R152a, CO2
and R1234yf) used in the automotive air conditioning system operating with various
conditions revealed the better COP with R152a in comparison with R134a whereas COP
of R1234yf and CO2 was observed to be slightly lower than R134a as presented in Table
2. From Table 1, GWP100of R1234yf (4) and CO2 (1) were observed to be very low as
compared to GWP100of R134a (1,300). Although GWP100 of R152a (140) was lower than
that of R134a (1,300), the safety measures must be followed while using R152a due to its
mildly flammable nature (ASHRAE A2 group). It is noticed that the increase of
refrigerant charge will increase the cooling capacity but the further increment of
refrigerant charging decreases the cooling capacity of the system. One of the important
factors noticed is that subcooling of the condenser temperature will approximately lead to
the achievement of optimal conditions of cooling capacity. With an increase in
References
Akram, M.W., Polychronopoulou, K. and Polycarpou, A.A. (2013) ‘Lubricity of environmentally
friendly HFO-1234yf refrigerant’, Tribology International, Vol. 57, pp.92–100. Bostanci, H.,
Altalidi, S.S. and Nasrazadani, S. (2018) ‘Two-phase spray cooling with HFC-134a and HFO-
1234yf on practical enhanced surfaces’, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 131, pp.150–158.
Cabello, R., Sánchez, D., Llopis, R., Catalán, J., Nebot-Andrés, L. and Torrella, E. (2017) ‘Energy
evaluation of R152a as drop in replacement for R134a in cascade refrigeration plants’, Applied
Thermal Engineering, Vol. 110, pp.972–984.
Cao, Y., Liu, C., Zhang, H., Xu, X. and Li, Q. (2017) ‘Thermal decomposition of HFO-1234yf
through ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulation’, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 126,
pp.330–338.
Dang, C., Jia, L., Xu, M., Huang, Q. and Peng, Q. (2017) ‘Experimental study on flow boiling
characteristics of pure refrigerant (R134a) and zeotropic mixture (R407C) in a rectangular
micro-channel’, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 104, pp.351–361.
Daviran, S., Kasaeian, A., Golzari, S., Mahian, O., Nasirivatan, S. and Wongwises, S. (2017) ‘A
comparative study on the performance of HFO-1234yf and HFC-134a as an alternative in
automotive air conditioning systems’, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 110, pp.1091–1100.
Dhar, P.L. and Gadhi, A.B. (1980) ‘An investigation into the use of R12, R12 mixtures in air
conditioners’, International Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.145–150. Dione, K.R.,
Louahlia, H., Marion, M. and Berçaits, J.L. (2018) ‘Evaporation heat transfer and pressure drop for
geothermal heat pumps working with refrigerants R134a and R407C’, International
Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 93, pp.1–10.
Esen, D.O. (2012) ‘Performance evaluation of an automobile air conditioning system using R134a’,
Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 433–440, pp.4952–4958.
Factor, A. and Miranda, P.M. (1991) ‘An investigation of the mechanism of the R12-oil-steel
reaction’, Wear, Vol. 150, Nos. 1–2, pp.41–58.
Fortkamp, F.P. and Barbosa Jr., J.R. (2015) ‘Refrigerant desorption and foaming in mixtures of
HFC-134a and HFO-1234yf and a polyol ester lubricating oil’, International Journal of
Refrigeration, Vol. 53, pp.69–79.
Gasche, J.L., Andreotti, T. and Maia, C.R.M. (2012) ‘A model to predict R134a refrigerant leakage
through the radial clearance of rolling piston compressors’, International Journal of
Refrigeration, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp.2223–2232.
Ghezloun, A., Saidane, A., Oucher, N. and Chergui, S. (2013) ‘The post-Kyoto’, Energy Procedia,
Vol. 36, pp.1–8.
Ghodbane, M. (1999) ‘An investigation of R152a and hydrocarbon refrigerants in mobile air
conditioning’, SAE Transactions, pp.1658–1673.
Gill, J. and Singh, J. (2017) ‘Energy analysis of vapor compression refrigeration system using
mixture of R134a and LPG as refrigerant’, International Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 84,
pp.287–299.
Gill, J. and Singh, J. (2018) ‘An applicability of ANFIS approach for depicting energetic
performance of VCRS using mixture of R134a and LPG as refrigerant’, International Journal
of Refrigeration, Vol. 85, pp.353–375.
Golzari, S., Kasaeian, A., Daviran, S., Mahian, O., Wongwises, S. and Sahin, A.Z. (2017) ‘Second
law analysis of an automotive air conditioning system using HFO-1234yf, an environmentally
friendly refrigerant’, International Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 73, pp.134–143.
Gullo, P., Tsamos, K., Hafner, A., Ge, Y. and Tassou, S.A. (2017) ‘State-of-the-art technologies for
transcritical R744 refrigeration systems – a theoretical assessment of energy advantages for
European food retail industry’, Energy Procedia, Vol. 123, pp.46–53.
Havelský, V. (2000) ‘Investigation of refrigerating system with R12 refrigerant replacements’,
Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.133–140.
Hazarika, M.M., Ramgopal, M. and Bhattacharyya, S. (2018) ‘Studies on a transcritical R744 based
summer air-conditioning unit: Impact of refrigerant charge on system performance’,
International Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 89, pp.22–39.
Hu, H., Eikevik, T.M., Neksa, P., Hafner, A., Ding, G., Huang, Q. and Ye, J. (2016) ‘Performance
analysis of an R744 ground source heat pump system with air-cooled and water-cooled gas
coolers’, International Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 63, pp.72–86.
Janotkova, E. and Pavelek, M. (2006) New Trends in the Field of Automobile Air Conditioning,
Department of Thermomechanics and Environmental Engineering, Brno University of
Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
Javidmand, P. and Hoffmann, K.A. (2016) ‘A comprehensive modeling of choked two-phase flow
through short-tube orifices with application to alternative refrigerants HFO-1234yf and HFO-
1234ze’, International Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 69, pp.114–135.
Jin, J., Chen, J. and Chen, Z. (2011) ‘Development and validation of a microchannel evaporator
model for a CO2 air-conditioning system’, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 31, Nos. 2–3,
pp.137–146.
Jin, Z., Eikevik, T.M., Nekså, P., Hafner, A. and Wang, R. (2017) ‘Annual energy performance of
R744 and R410A heat pumping systems’, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 117, pp.568–
576.
Kabeel, A.E., Khalil, A., Bassuoni, M.M. and Raslan, M.S. (2016) ‘Comparative experimental
study of low GWP alternative for R134a in a walk-in cold room’, International Journal of
Refrigeration, Vol. 69, pp.303–312.
Kiatsiriroat, T. and Euakit, T. (1997) ‘Performance analyses of an automobile air-conditioning
system with R22/R124/R152A refrigerant’, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 17 No. 11,
pp.1085–1097.
Koytsoumpa, E.I., Bergins, C. and Kakaras, E. (2018) ‘The CO2 economy: Review of CO2 capture
and reuse technologies’, The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol. 132, pp.3–16.
Lee, D. (2015) ‘Study of performance optimization as an alternative refrigerant HFC152a in a
mobile air conditioning system’, Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration
Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp.321–327.
Lim, S., Kim, M.S., Choi, J.W., Kim, H., Ahn, B.S., Lee, S.D., Lee, H., Kim, C.S., Suh, D.J., Ha,
J.M. and Song, K.H. (2017) ‘Catalytic dehydrofluorination of 1, 1, 1, 2, 3-pentafluoropropane
(HFC-245eb) to 2, 3, 3, 3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf) using in-situ fluorinated
chromium oxyfluoride catalyst’, Catalysis Today, Vols. 293–294, pp.42–48.
Lorentzen, G. (1994) ‘Revival of carbon dioxide as a refrigerant’, International Journal of
Refrigeration, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp.292–301.
Lorentzen, G. and Pettersen, J. (1993) ‘A new, efficient and environmentally benign system for car
air-conditioning’, International Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp.4–12.
Shaik, S.V. and Babu, T.A. (2017b) ‘Theoretical performance investigation of vapour compression
refrigeration system using HFC and HC refrigerant mixtures as alternatives to replace R22’,
Energy Procedia, Vol. 109, pp.235–242.
Shaik, S.V. and Babu, T.A. (2017c) ‘Theoretical computation of performance of sustainable energy
efficient R22 alternatives for residential air conditioners’, Energy Procedia, Vol. 138, pp.710–
716.
Shaik, S.V. and Babu, T.A. (2018a) ‘Analytical computation of GWP, ODP, RF number and TEWI
analysis of various R134a/R1270/R290 blends as R22 alternatives’, in Vanchipura, R. and Jiji,
K.S. (Eds.): Emerging Trends in Engineering, Science and Technology for Society, pp.443–
449, Energy and Environment, Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press, London.
Shaik, S.V. and Babu, T.P.A. (2018b) ‘Thermodynamic performance analysis and flammability
study of various new ozone friendly non azeotropic refrigerant mixtures as alternatives to
replace R22 used in residential air conditioners’, International Journal of Heat and
Technology, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp.1470–1481.
Shaik, S.V. and Setty, A.B.T.P. (2019) ‘Thermodynamic analysis of window air conditioner using
sustainable refrigerant R290/RE170 and R1270/RE170 blends as substitutes to refrigerant
R22’, International Journal of Heat and Technology, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp.80–94.
Sivashanmugam, P. (2012) ‘Application of nano fluids in heat transfer’, in An Overview of Heat
Transfer Phenomena, pp.411–440, IntechOpen, London.
Sotomayor, P.O. and Parise, J.A.R. (2016) ‘Characterization and simulation of an open piston
compressor for application on automotive air-conditioning systems operating with R134a,
R1234yf and R290’, International Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 61, pp.100–116.
Tamura, T., Yakumaru, Y. and Nishiwaki, F. (2005) ‘Experimental study on automotive cooling
and heating air conditioning system using CO 2 as a refrigerant’, International Journal of
Refrigeration, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp.1302–1307.
Tashtoush, B., Tahat, M. and Shudeifat, M.A. (2002) ‘Experimental study of new refrigerant
mixtures to replace R12 in domestic refrigerators’, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 22, No.
5, pp.495–506.
Tianduo, P. and Xunmin, O. (2017) ‘Scenario Analysis on CO 2-equivalent Emissions from
alternative mobile air conditioning refrigerants in China’, Energy Procedia, Vol. 142,
pp.2617–2623.
Vaghela, J.K. (2017) ‘Comparative evaluation of an automobile air-conditioning system using
R134a and its alternative refrigerants’, Energy Procedia, Vol. 109, pp.153–160. Vali, S.S., Setty,
T.P. and Babu, A. (2018a) ‘Performance computation of window air conditioner with very low
GWP near azeotropic refrigerant mixtures as a drop in Substitutes to R22’, MATEC Web of
Conferences, Vol. 144, pp.1–11.
Vali, S.S., Setty, T.P. and Babu, A. (2018b) ‘Analytical computation of thermodynamic
performance parameters of actual vapour compression refrigeration system with R22, R32,
R134a, R152a, R290 and R1270’, MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 144, pp.1–12.
Valiron, P., Kedžuch, S. and Noga, J. (2003) ‘Avoiding numerical instabilities in R12 calculations
through universal R12 consistent basis sets’, Chemical physics letters, Vol. 367, Nos. 5–6,
pp.723–729.
Wang, C.C. (2014) ‘System performance of R-1234yf refrigerant in air-conditioning and heat pump
system–An overview of current status’, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 73, No. 2,
pp.1412–1420.
Wang, D., Yu, B., Hu, J., Chen, L., Shi, J. and Chen, J. (2018) ‘Heating performance characteristics
of CO2 heat pump system for electrical vehicle in a cold climate’, International Journal of
Refrigeration, Vol. 85, pp.27–41.
Wang, R.Z. and Li, Y. (2007) ‘Perspectives for natural working fluids in China’, International
Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.568–581.