08 SEP671 REL670 Exercise 7 Distance Protection and Power Swing
08 SEP671 REL670 Exercise 7 Distance Protection and Power Swing
1MRG005017
Exercise 7 - Distance protection and power swing
Copyright
This document and parts thereof must not be reproduced or copied without
written permission from ABB, and the contents thereof must not be imparted to
a third party, nor used for any unauthorized purpose.
Trademarks
ABB is a registered trademark of ABB Group. All other brand or product names
mentioned in this document may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their
respective holders.
ABB AB
Substation Automation Products
SE-721 59 Västerås
Sweden
Telephone: +46 (0) 21 34 20 00
Facsimile: +46 (0) 21 14 69 18
www.abb.com/substationautomation
Distance protection in REL670 may trip in case of power swing. If the impedance trajectory enters in the
characteristic of one distance protection zone, it will start and if the time trajectory stays within the zone more
than the time delay, the zone will trip.
This is very common for zones with time delay below ca 0,8 seconds. For zones with time delay higher than 1
second, usually the impedance trajectory associated to power swing manages to leave the zone before it
operates.
The function power swing has been designed to recognize a power swing system situation and issue the signal
“power swing detected” that in REL670-A32 has been configured to block the distance protection zones
preventing the trip. The algorithm is based on the measurement of the speed of the impedance trajectory.
In this section we will set and test the power swing function and its interaction with distance protection by
performing several tests.
Relay settings
Distance protection settings, and communication schemes, are the same as for the previous exercise.
REL670_1.2== ZM zones_1.0.xls
available in the folder
Files for SEP-602A REL670 / EXCEL FILES
on the desktop of your training PC.
In order to test the power swing function it is necessary first to verify the impedance protection characteristic
(zones “Zout” and “Zin”). To this, the power swing zones are treated as normal distance protection zones, with
instantaneous trip time.
Later on power swing is tested in its functionality of detecting the “impedance trajectory speed” and blocking
distance protection. There is no need to simulate a pseudo-continuous impedance ramp for commissioning tests.
For performance/acceptance tests, it is necessary to realistically simulate the power swing waveforms, and
usually a power network simulator is necessary.
The starting signals from the two power swing zones (“Out” and “In”) are available at binary outputs 7 and 8 of
the IOM card. You need to connect them to the relay test set:
IOM OUTPUT 7 (Power swing zone Out, “PSD_ZOUT”) Binary Input 6 of the test set
IOM OUTPUT 8 (Power swing zone In, “PSD_ZIN”) Binary Input 7 of the test set
You can keep the other connections between REL670 and the relay test, but they will not be used.
3. Open the Omicron test file for the “ZOUT” zone and run the tests
4. Open the Omicron test file for the “ZIN” zone and run the tests
The power swing detection is based on the measurement of two non directional impedance zones “ZOUT” and
“ZIN”. In order to test the functionality it is necessary to inject a sequence of steady state states, as shown in
Figure 5.
State 1 represents a normal load
condition.
State 2 represents one 3-phase
apparent impedance between
“ZOUT” and “ZIN”.
State 3 represents a 3-phase fault in
zone 1.
The power swing detection signal is available at the binary output 6 of the IOM card.. You need to connect them
to the relay test set:
IOM OUTPUT 6 (Power swing detected, “PSD_START”) Binary Input 8 of the test set
You can keep the other connections between REL670 and the relay test set, but they will not be used.
The sequence used to test the second timer is available on the file REL670 Power Swing Sequence tP1-tP2.seq
in the folder Files for SEP-602A REL670 / OMICRON TESTS on the desktop of your training PC.
11. Run the sequence and verify no trip by and two power swing detections
Figure 11: Simulation of the second swing, timers tP1 and tP2
12. Change the parameters in the proposed sequence to verify other combinations
Verify the table of cases proposed here below. Consider at least 15 ms more when positioning an impedance
between ZOUT and ZIN for a timer larger than tP1 or tP2