Topic-8: Out Line of The Session
Topic-8: Out Line of The Session
Topic-8
sampling.
1
19-Sep-20
Sampling-Definition
Sampling is the technic/technics of selecting
sample/samples from a population. and
Necessity of sampling
•The population of interest is usually too large to
attempt to survey all of its members.
2
19-Sep-20
•Easy to supervise
3
19-Sep-20
Continued
•Population is a group that includes all the cases
(individuals, objects, or groups) in which the
researcher is interested.
Continued
• Rely on logic and judgment.
4
19-Sep-20
Continued
• A sampling frame is a list of sampling units.
Types of sampling
• A) Probability Sampling
1. Random, 2. Systematic, 3. Stratified
4. Cluster, 5. Multi-stage
6. Probability Proportionate to Size (PPS)
• B) Non-probability Sampling
1. Convenience, 2. Judgment/Purposive, 3. Quota
4. Snowball, 5. Extreme, 6. Self-selected
5
19-Sep-20
A) Probability Sampling
• Probability Samples: each member of the population
has a known non-zero probability of being selected
• Methods include random , systematic, stratified,
cluster, multi-stage, and PPS sampling.
6
19-Sep-20
Continued
Advantages/strengths:
Simple theory and easiest to understand.
Continued
Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
Where population variability is very sporadic and irregular,
cannot be used
7
19-Sep-20
• After the required sample size has been calculated, every Nth
record is selected from a list of population members.
• As long as the list does not contain any hidden order, this
sampling method is as good as the random sampling method.
Continued
Advantages/strengths:
Quicker than simple random sampling
8
19-Sep-20
Continued
Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
If the population is not random, it is not suitable to use
9
19-Sep-20
Continued
Advantages/strengths:
More efficient than simple random sampling.
Convenient to administer
Continued
Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
Additional prior info. of population is required
10
19-Sep-20
Continued
Examples of clusters:
City blocks – political or geographical
Hospitals – illnesses
11
19-Sep-20
Continued
Advantages/strengths:
No needs to construct a list of elements
Continued
Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
Reliability is lower than simple or stratified sampling
Lacks representation
12
19-Sep-20
Continued
Advantages/strengths:
More representative
13
19-Sep-20
Continued
Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
Complexity in theory
14
19-Sep-20
Continued
• For example, if one sample had 20,000 members, the
probability of a member being selected would be
1/20000 or .005 percent. If another sample had 10,000
members, the chance of a member being selected
would be 1/10000 or .01 percent.
Continued
Advantages/strengths:
Helps to avoid underrepresenting and
overrepresenting one subgroup and yields more
accurate results.
Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
Time consuming and sophisticated to use
15
19-Sep-20
B) Non-probability Sampling
Technique in which samples are selected in a way
that is not suggested by probability theory.
Continued
Reliance on available subjects:
16
19-Sep-20
Continued
•Advantages/strengths:
•Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
17
19-Sep-20
Continued
Advantages/strengths:
Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
18
19-Sep-20
Continued
Advantages/strengths:
Less costly than other non-probability techniques
Does not require sampling frame
Can be completed in a short period of time
Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
Not representative
Has researcher’s bias
Sometimes fulfilling quota is not possible
19
19-Sep-20
Continued
Advantages/strengths:
Can use when target population is unknown
When difficult to approach respondents (lets say drug
addicted people)
Reduced sample size and costs
Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
Bias can enter
Known and unknow people can weaken research
position
20
19-Sep-20
Continued
Advantages/strengths:
Can draw attention of policymakers for an extreme case
Almost opt out topic can be researched through this
method
Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
Will not be representative
Requires serious justification supported by strong
materialistic evidences
21
19-Sep-20
Continued
Advantages/strengths:
Convenient for the researcher
Where may be you cannot use any other method in
that case only you can use
Disadvantages/limitations/challenges:
Still can have chance of bias
Acceptability can be low
22
19-Sep-20
Continued
2. Mostly on availability of resources and materials
23
19-Sep-20
Continued
7. How big a sample is desirable?
•In some cases, it is clear requirement, and in some other cases it is not
that straightforward.
2. Not towards fixed samples but towards flexible samples in size and
types of subjects
24
19-Sep-20
Continued
3. Not towards random sampling but towards purposive sampling;
7. Not even towards choosing a sample before the study, but often
while the study is in progress.
25
19-Sep-20
Continued
4. Nature of the study: Qualitative or quantitative
26
19-Sep-20
Continued
8. Desired accuracy or confidence level: High accuracy large sample,
Here,
n = sample size
N = Population
e = value of error against confidence level
27
19-Sep-20
Continued
Calculation
n = 500/1 + 500(.05)2
= 500/1+500(.0025)
= 500/1+1.25
= 500/2.25
= 222
Continued
2) 2nd formula by Fink and Kosecoff (1995:62)
n = (z/e)2 (p) (1-p)
Here,
n = sample size
Z = standard score corresponding to a given confidence level
e = value of error against confidence level
p = estimated percentage to population
28
19-Sep-20
Continued
Calculation
Suppose percentage of population is 25%, and confidence level is
90%.
Hence, z = 1.96 (given from the table), e = (100-90)/100 = 0.10, p
= 0.25
n = pqz2/E2
Here,
p = 10
q = 100 - p = 100 - 10 = 90
z = 1.96 (at 95% confidence level)
E = 100 - 95 = 5
29
19-Sep-20
Continued
Calculation
n = 10 (90) (1.96)2/52
= (900 x 3.84)/25
= 3457.44/25
= 138.29
= 138
If we change the value of p, q, z, and E, the sample size can be
flexibly determine. However, E is inversely related with sampling
size.
Here,
p = population estimate
E = error
Z = confidence level
30
19-Sep-20
Population 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 10%
10,000 5,000 2,000 1,000 588 385 99
25,000 7,143 2,273 1,064 610 394 100
50,000 8,333 2,381 1,087 617 397 100
1,00,000 9,091 2,439 1,099 621 398 100
31
19-Sep-20
Continued
5) Comparatively discuss the popular methods of non-probability
sampling.
8) Identify and discuss the major consideration for fixing sample size.
9) How many techniques you know to fix sample size? Elaborate any
two techniques with example.
32
19-Sep-20
Thanks
33