Reflection 1
Reflection 1
Mariyah Sanchez
Maddie Roepe
WRIT 2
09 December 2023
Reflection
“Time flies over us, but leaves its shadow behind.” This is a quote by Nathaniel
Hawthorne that is so simple but yet has a significant meaning. I wanted to start off this reflection
throughout Writing 2. The course flew by in a blink of an eye and yet it still has not processed in
my mind. One day I was writing my first journal entry and the next I was making my final
revisions for my final portfolio. Although the time passed by so quickly, every assignment within
this course left me with some piece of information to improve as a writer. When reflecting back
on my writing from the beginning of the course I can see an immense difference. I feel confident
in saying that I now have a better understanding on how to think, read and write like a writer.
Throughout Writing 2 I learned so much about myself as a writer. I was able to analyze
my writing in depth which allowed me to see my strengths and weaknesses. Two readings from
this course that have consistently stuck with me and impacted my writing throughout the year
were, Peter Elbows, “Teaching Two Kinds Of Thinking By Teaching Writing,” (1986.) and, Clint
Johnsons, “On Genre,” (2016.) These two readings really played a huge role in both my WP1
and WP2. In completing both of these projects, I believe the most important stages were deciding
what pieces of information I wanted to include in my writing, as well as how to include it.
Sanchez 2
Starting off with my first writing project, WP1, I learned that almost every text can be
translated into a new genre. It was interesting to see how I could take a scientific article with
complex information and completely turn it into a brochure, which is a form of genre that is
more simplified. Specifically with WP1 I looked at Clint Johnson's article to help me make the
transition between genres. “Each genre is different in form but also in how, when, and why it is
used. This is because each genre exists for specific reasons, to do particular things in the world.”
(Johson, 2016). Johnson's text helped me come to the conclusion of translating the scientific
article into a brochure. I made this decision because I knew that the information would be
targeted towards parents. With the brochure I could inform them as to why excessive screen time
is not beneficial and provide solutions to this problem. Reflecting on the project, I would say that
my favorite section was my conclusion. I say this because I was able to give credit to the four
sources in helping me efficiently translate the genre as well as state my main purpose of the
translation. On the contrary, the most challenging part of this project was deciding which pieces
from my article that I would carry along throughout the translation. “What we learn about one
genre in a specific situation can often help us learn to communicate effectively in a similar but
not identical situation.” (Johnson, 2016). With the advice Johnson gave, I was able to identify the
most important pieces of information that would help me effectively convey my objective in my
brochure.
Now looking at WP2, I can see a huge difference in my first attempt compared to my
second. I had a difficult time understanding the whole project which is why my first attempt was
rough. The research for this project was not like anything I had ever done before so getting to my
final goal was not easy. Truly, the research process set me back a lot and as a result I did not
Sanchez 3
complete the project on time. After going through the entire project a second time for this
portfolio, I would say I was able to better analyze the articles I chose. With a better
understanding of the articles I could connect them to my main argument, which was how
different classroom environments affect students' learning capabilities. Reflecting on this project,
I give a lot of credit to Peter Elbows, “Teaching Two Kinds Of Thinking By Teaching Writing,”
(1986.) This article helped me to distinguish between first and second-order thinking within my
project and make changes to improve it entirely. “Second-order thinking is a way to check our
thinking, to be more aware, to steer instead of being steered…we need first-order thinking to
generate a rich array of insights” (Elbow, 1986). The way in which I used this information was to
recognize first-order thinking such as deciding to include a lot of detail in my cover letter and
realizing the mistake I made with second-order thinking to reformat the entire letter. With this, I
was able to complete the objective of the project; to have a scholarly conversation with a friend.
Personally I didn't really like the idea of a scholarly conversation because I don't think it’s
necessarily a conversation I would have outside of the classroom about this specific topic. Aside
from that, I enjoyed making the translation and I hope that is noticeable from the amount of work
All in all, I believe I learned a lot from Writing 2. The course gave me a better
understanding of writing and methods that I can use to improve my writing. WP1 and WP2
definitely challenged my writing capabilities but also taught me new things such as genre
translations and new ways of researching. These lessons will stay with me as I progress my
writing experience as I already see myself using them constantly. I give thanks to the course,
professor Roepe and my peers for helping me improve my writing in giving me an outside
Sanchez 4
perspective on it. I believe they truly played a role in my progress, for there is only so much
room for improvement in my own eyes. Although the time flew by quite quickly, I was left with
Works Cited
Elbow, Peter. Embracing Contraries: Explorations in Learning and Teaching. New York: Oxford
U Press. 1986.
Johnson, Clint. “On Genre.” Open English SLCC, Open English @ SLCC, 1 Aug. 2016,
pressbooks.pub/openenglishatslcc/chapter/on-genre/.