Empowering Education: The Transformative Role of AI Tools and Applications in Student Learning
Empowering Education: The Transformative Role of AI Tools and Applications in Student Learning
Srinagar-190006, J&K
PROJECT REPORT
ON
(MLIS)
Syedah Munteha Saima Afzal
Roll no: 21023118003 Rollno: 21023118025
University of Kashmir.
i
DECLARATION
Syedah Munteha
Saima Afzal
Qamroosh Shakil
Binishta Hamid
POST GRADUATE DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE
UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR
CERTIFICATE
THIS is certified that this project entitled “Exploration and Identification of Top
AI Tools for Education and Research”is a bonafied work of “Syedah Munteha,
Saima Afzal, Qamroosh Shakil and Binishta Hamid”carried out exclusively in
partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of Master’s Degree in Library
and Information Science.
Declaration I
Certificate II
Acknowledgement III
TABLE OF CONTENTS
References 10-11
References
5.2 Conclusion
Bibliography
i
1.1 INTRODUCTION:
The basis of education is how it is taught and learned, a dynamic exchange that
helps students advance their quest for knowledge and skill development. This
process is an intricate, multidimensional interaction between teachers and
students shaped by several variables, all vital in determining the nature of the
educational process. Teaching is primarily the art and science of disseminating
information and facilitating learning. Proficiency in the subject matter is not
enough for effective teaching; one must also be able to engage and encourage
students. To create an atmosphere that promotes interest, reasoning, and
engaged participation, educators must modify their teaching strategies to
accommodate a range of learning preferences. To ensure that students
understand and retain the material, the teaching process entails preparing,
providing content, evaluating progress, and modifying instructional tactics. In
contrast, the learning process is a highly personalized experience that is shaped
by a variety of elements, including enthusiasm, past knowledge, and the learning
environment. Education and learning are two-way processes. It relies on
cooperation and efficient communication. To promote a feeling of safety and
belonging, educators must establish a welcoming and inclusive atmosphere. This
motivates the students to participate in the discussion, ask clarifications, and raise
questions. Teachers can then improve their techniques and adjust to the needs of
their students by using feedback and active participation from their students.
A student’s learning pattern and teacher’s teaching pattern have changed from
time to time due to many such deviations. In the present scenario, learners need
an easy way of learning and similar is the expectation from tutors. This has
changed the pattern of teaching and learning aids being used in classrooms. From
the inputs of the Congress Research Service, the application of AI in classrooms is
noticed in terms of:
1
Personalizing Learning. ITS and adaptive tutors tailor learning material, pace,
sequence, and difficulty to each student’s needs. AI can also provide support for
special needs students, for instance by teaching autistic children to identify facial
expressions.
AI was used for the first time in 1956 during a workshop organized by John
McCarthy at Dartmouth College. The workshop proposed that the research will
proceed under the hypothesis that every facet of intelligence, including learning,
can theoretically be described with such precision that a machine could be
trained to mimic it. The goal was to figure out how to make machines speak,
create abstractions and concepts, solve problems that are currently exclusive to
humans, and advance technologically. (Russel & Norvig, 2010).
Luckin et al. (2016) define AI as “computer systems that have been designed
to interact with the world through capabilities (for example, visual
perception and speech. recognition) and intelligent behaviors (for example,
assessing the available information and then taking the most sensible action
to achieve a stated goal) that we would think of as essentially human”.
AI IN EDUCATION:
The application of artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) has been the subject of
academic research for more than 30 years. The field investigates learning
wherever it occurs, in traditional classrooms or in workplaces, to support formal
education as well as lifelong learning. It brings together AI, which is itself
interdisciplinary, and the learning sciences (education, psychology, neuroscience,
linguistics, sociology, and anthropology) to promote the development of adaptive
learning environments and other AIEd tools that are flexible, inclusive,
personalized, engaging, and effective.(Luckin et al. 2016)
AI offers several technological solutions that can be tailored to the needs of those
with impairments. Many studies have been conducted in the field of artificial
intelligence. AI has provided around-the-clock care using Robotics for people with
disabilities. AI has helped people to use mobile applications without even clicking
on them. For instance “Siri” in mobiles has enabled people to access mobile
applications without even actually clicking on them. Another example from
Google is “Alexa” which has enabled people to ask for any information without
typing in the search bar. (Lynch, 2018)
Belpaeme et al. (2012) used sensory features, such as facial expression, body
movements and voice recordings, as inputs to a machine learning model
(implemented in a robot) to analyze autistic children’s behavior and engagement
levels for therapy. These input features were then combined with target outputs,
and engagement markers, in this case, to train the model. The study proved the
potential for the robot to adapt to its interactant, influencing participant
engagement. In another study, Sanghvi et al. (2011) used postural expressions,
such as silhouette images of the upper body, as they played chess with a robot to
analyze the engagement levels of autistic children. Another positive outcome was
established through this study; the potential of integrating representative data (as
described above) with an affect recognition model to act as a game mate for
autistic children in the real world. In a different study, Kim et al. (2017) used
audio recordings as input features to analyze the emotional states of autistic
children. These features were fed to the support vector machine model,
integrated with a robot, to assess their social engagement as they played with the
robots. This enhanced audio-based emotion forecast approach discusses the
possibility of sustaining a more natural interaction between autistic children and
the robot, hence allowing the robot to assess the engagement level of the
children more accurately and modify its responses to maintain an interactive
learning environment. Other researchers have explored different input features,
such as facial expressions, body movements, bio signals and vocalizations.
This study explores and identifies the various shades of artificial intelligence tools
available and used in educational settings. The study also made a categorization
of identified AI tools in the field of education. The top ten AI tools from identified
categories were gauged for their web metrics to measure their popularity and
usefulness among the global user community.
1.3 SCOPE:
This study delves into the intricate details of AI tool adoption within the age group
of 18-65+, categorizing tools into Research and academic AI writing tools, Content
creation AI tools and AI tools for Specially-abled individuals. The study exclusively
uses the data that was gathered in August –September(2023) and adds a global
perspective by analyzing rankings on a global, national, and category level as well
as other critical metrics. The study makes an effort to offer a comprehensive
understanding of user engagement by carefully examining the distribution of age
and gender among the audience as well as important metrics like bounce rate,
followers, marketing channel distribution, top keywords, and total app visits. The
study describes the unique dynamics of AI tool usage and provides valuable
insight into the practical uses and applications of these tools.
1.4 OBJECTIVES:
3. To identify the top ten AI tools from identified categories based on web
metrics.
1.5 METHODOLOGY:
PHASE I:
PHASE II:
After the initial exploration of AI tools in education and research, the AI resources
were divided into three categories: Research And Academic Writing AI Tools,
Content Creation AI Tools and AI Tools For Specially Abled. Subsequently, an
organized approach was utilized to collect pertinent data, commencing with the
establishment of crucial search terms for every classification. The terms "AI tools
for academic research," "AI tools for researchers," and "AI tools in education"
were selected for the first category. Similarly, keywords such as: "AI content
writing tools", "Best AI content creations tool" and "AI tools for disabled", "AI
tools for disabilities", were defined for the second and third categories
respectively. After that, Google was chosen as the primary search engine.
Following that, an assessment was conducted on the top 10 search results that
appeared on the webpage concerning the three categories, for all three
categories inclusion criteria were established ensuring that the chosen results
aligned with the theme. Conversely, exclusion criteria were applied to filter out
results containing irrelevant information. It was observed some of the search
results would list more than one AI tool. This was more so because a number of
individuals and platforms have shortlisted AI tools in the selected field. This acted
as a great help for the current study.
PHASE III:
The selection of the data collection method was made in the third stage. To
collect the necessary data about the identified AI tools it was agreed that the
study would use a web crawling/web scraping technique. To provide web
analytics, web traffic, and performance of AI-driven apps, websites like Adobe
Analytics, StatCounter, Google Analytics 360, and Similar Web were chosen.
However, due to the fact these are toll-based, Similar Web was selected for the
study. Similar Web gives data on website traffic, referrals, search terms, and other
topics. It is a useful tool for digital marketing and competitive analysis since users
can examine website traffic, visitor demographics, and interaction metrics.
PHASE IV:
After accessing Similar Web, the required data was collected, tabulated, and
analyzed which is presented in Chapter IV of this report.
References:
Joyce, J. Lu., & Harris, L. A. (2018, August 1). Artificial intelligence (AI) and education.
UNT Digital Library. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1228526/
Russell, S. J., Norvig, P., & Davis, E. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach.
Prentice Hall.https://ds.amu.edu.et/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/10406/artificial
%20intelligence%20-%20a%20modern%20approach%20%283rd%2C%202009%29.pdf?
sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Stone, P., Brooks, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Calo, R., Etzioni, O., Hager, G., Hirschberg, J.,
Kalyanakrishnan, S., Kamar, E., Kraus, S., Leyton-Brown, K., Parkes, D., Press, W.,
Saxenian, A., Shah, J., Tambe, M., & Teller, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Life in
2030: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.06318
Luckin, R. (2016, February 22). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in
Education.https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1475756/
McNeill, Samuell. (2018). Artificial intelligence in the classroom. (2019, January 11).
Microsoft EDU | Education Stories. https://edublog.microsoft.com/en-au/2019/01/artificial-
intelligence-in-the-classroom/
Borge, N. (2016). White paper - Artificial Intelligence to Improve Education / Learning
Challenges.International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Innovative Technology
(IJAEIT), 2(6), 10-13.http://ijaeit.com/Paper/Index/47
Arrigo, M. (2005). E-learning accessibility for blind students. Recent Research
Developments in Learning Technologies, 8(2), 1-5.http://medialt.no/pub/utin/Blind
%20students.pdf
UNESCO. (2013). UNESCO global report: Opening New Avenues for Empowerment: ICTs
to Access Information and Knowledge for Persons with Disabilities” global summary report.
UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000219767
Microsoft 2017 annual report. (2017). Letter to
Shareholders.https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar17/index.html
Laabidi, M., Jemni, M., Ayed, L. J. B., Brahim, H. B., & Jemaa, A. B. (2014).
Learning technologies for people with disabilities. Journal of King Saud University-
Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 29-
45.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.005
World Health Organization. (2011).World Report on Disability.
https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/sensory-functions-disability-and-
rehabilitation/world-report-on-disability
White Paper on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Official publication and Gazetting of
the White Paper on Rights of Persons with disabilities.(2016).The Department of Social
Development.
https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201603/39792gon230.pdf
Lynch, M. (2018, April 24). How Artificial Intelligence is Improving Assistive Technology.
The Tech Edvocate. https://www.thetechedvocate.org/how-artificial-intelligence-is-
improving-assistive-technology/
Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., Read, R., Wood, R., Cuayáhuitl, H., Kiefer, B., ... & Humbert, R.
(2012). Multimodal child-robot interaction: Building social bonds. Journal of Human-Robot
Interaction, 1(2).http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/22210
Sanghvi, J., Castellano, G., Leite, I., Pereira, A., McOwan, P. W., & Paiva, A. (2011,
March). Automatic analysis of affective postures and body motion to detect
engagement with a game companion. In Proceedings of the 6th international
conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 305-312).
https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1957656.1957781
Kim, J. C., Azzi, P., Jeon, M., Howard, A. M., & Park, C. H. (2017, June). Audio-based emotion
estimation for interactive robotic therapy for children with autism spectrum disorder.
In 2017 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence
(URAI) (pp. 39-44). IEEE.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7992881/
CHAPTER II
EXPLORING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN
EDUCATION
1
2.1 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: AN OVERVIEW
The use of computers in various areas of the education sector, and more especially,various
departments in educational institutions, such as the development of computer-aided
instruction and learning(CAI/L) in classroom interactions,was made possible by advances in
computers and related computing technologies that built on earlier research into programmed
instructions from the mid-1900s(Chen,Chen & Lin,2020).
The use of computers in education has increased in various ways thanks to later developments
in computer and computer-related technologies such as networking,the internet, the World
Wide Web and increased processing, computing and other capabilities, including various task-
oriented programs and software packages. Specifically, in several divisions of educational
institutions the advancement of computer and information communication technologies over
time has facilitated the creation of artificial intelligence. According to Coppin, artificial
intelligence is the ability of computers to adapt to new settings, deal with developing scenarios,
solve problems, provide answers, devise plans and carry out a variety of other tasks that call for
a level of intelligence that is often present in humans(Coppin,2004).
When John McCarthy organized a two-month workshop at Dartmouth College in the United
States in the 1950s, artificial intelligence (AI) was born. McCarthy first used the term "artificial
intelligence" in the workshop proposal in 1956.The hypothesis that will serve as the foundation
for the study of artificial intelligence. In theory, any facet of learning or any other characteristic
of intelligence can be so pre-concisely described that it can be replicated by a machine. There
will be an attempt to learn how to program robots to speak, create abstractions and concepts,
and solve problems of all of issues that are now exclusively human-related, and better
themselves(Zawacki-Ritcher et al.,2019).
The scientific objective of AI is to comprehend intelligence by creating computer programs that
behave intelligently through symbolic inference, or internal machine reasoning. Definition of AI
is not independent of time. It provides an assessment of any system by being mindful of the
time(Sing,Mishra & Sagar,2013).
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a field of engineering that applies new ideas and innovative ways to
solve difficult problems. Computers may eventually surpass human intelligence if
advancements in software development, technological speed, and capacity are sustained.
Current cybernetics has made a significant contribution to AI development that cannot be
overlooked(Hamet & Trambaly,2017).AI is a concept that is defined as a system’s ability to
correctly interpret external data, to learn from such data and to use that learning to
achievespecific goals and tasks through flexible adaptation(Kaplan & Haenlein,2019).AI is based
on the development of autonomous agents that can reason and plan towards their goal without
any built-in knowledge base of their environment(Gurkaynak ,Yilmaz & Haksever,2016).
Charniak and McDermott expressed the term Artificial intelligence as “The study of
mental faculties through the use of computational models.” (Charniak &
McDermott,1985).
Ritch and Knight expressed the term Artificial intelligence as "The study of
how to make computers do things at which, at the moment, people are
better." (Rich & Knight,1991).
Nilsson defined the term artificial intelligence as “AI ... is concerned with
intelligent behavior in artefacts. (Nilsson,1998)
Now we can state informally our definition: AI will be such a program which in an
arbitrary world will cope not worse than a human(Dobrev,2004).AI may be
defined as: “the ability to hold two different ideas in mind at the same time and
still remain the ability to function”. But AI must include the learning from past
experience, reasoning for the decision making, inference power and quick
response. Also it must be able to take decisions on the basis of priorities and
tackle complexity and ambiguity(Mustapha, Haruna & Muhammad,2020).
Gaming: A great impact is made on the industry of gaming by Artificial Intelligence. Itis
one of the fastest-growing frameworks in the planet. Using a technique known as brute force
technology, machines scan thousands of moves at once. Microsoft Xbox employs artificial
intelligence to detect body motion and reply to gamers in a more exciting way. Even
though computers are not as intelligent as humans, they cannot be vanquished in a chess
gamesince artificial intelligence is used. In this industry, we are seeing Himalayan
improvements, but the truth is that it is still taking baby steps(Furman & Seamans,2019).
The presentation of the digital learning content that is currently being created is made possible
by the use of AI. Thick textbooks can now be presented in a way that is shorter, simpler for
students to read, and easier to understand, like study guides, material summaries, or brief
notes(Fitria,2021).The field of AI is both innovative and derivative(Kegam,2020).As a
cornerstone of the industrial revolution, AI 4.0 is crucial to supporting the technologically
mediated learning process. Artificial intelligence (AI) is the process of simulating human thought
and creating machines that can perform cognitive tasks, such as learning automatically from
pre-programmed data and information, in order to behave like humans. Artificial intelligence
has been incorporated into many applications as a benefit(Fitria,2021).
Artificial super intelligence, general AI, and narrow AI are the three categories of AI. The most
prevalent and developed type of AI to date is narrow AI. It is highly goal-oriented and employs
machine learning methods to complete a single task or goal (e.g., image and facial recognition,
Alexa/Siri). AI considered to be on par with humans is known as general (or deep) AI abilities
(for instance, AI that is able to recognize the requirements and feelings of other intelligent
beings).Thirdly, Artificial Super intelligence is AI that is superior to humans in terms of
intelligence (much like AI in science fiction films is portrayed as being superior to humans in
every way(Hassani et al.,2020) .These tools are being quickly incorporated into classrooms. K–
12 education is incorporating an increasing number of artificial intelligence education
products(Yufeia et al.,2020).
Literature Studies demonstrate the use of artificial intelligence in education with some
factors(Yufeia et al.,2020).
i. Automatic grading system: While AI might not ever be ready to actually replace
human grading, it’s obtaining pretty shut. It’s currently potential for academics to
alter grading for nearly every kind of multiple alternative and fill-in-the-blank testing
and automatic grading of student writing might not be so much behind(Neha,2020).
ii. Teacher's assessment:AI technologies such as image recognition, prediction system and
computer vision provide convenience for teaching assessment. In the teaching process,
the assessment of students is an essential part. In traditional teaching, it takes a long
time for teachers to complete the assessment tasks, such as question preparation,
scoring, performance evaluation, and test paper analysis. AI makes teaching evaluation
methods more diverse, the evaluation process more scientific, and the evaluation
results more accurate(Huang et.al,2021)
iii. Personalized learning:Personalized learning is a systematic learning design that adapts
learning to the personal strengths, preferences, needs and goals of an individual learner.
It leads to a comprehensive learning experience by ensuring a wide choice of new
disciplines and skills development(Tapalova & Zhiyenbayeva,2022).
iv.
v. Adaptive learning:AI promotes the development of adaptive learning, in which data
mining, intelligent teaching systems, learning analytics, and real-time analysis are
applied in adaptive learning. Adaptive learning attempts to incorporate all aspects of
testing, teaching, learning, and practice into the adaptive learning system to facilitate
students’ learning (Van Der Vorst & Jelicic, 2019).
vii. Intelligent campus:The intelligent campus is an important place for talent training, and
the application of AI technology to build a smart campus. It has become a new
development trend in the education field (Dong et al., 2020).
The development of systems that are equally effective as one-on-one human tutoring is a
priority for the Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) community(VanLehn,2011).
Significant strides have been made in that direction over the past 25 years. A typical example of
AIED practices, however, has frequently involved a student using a computer to solve step-
based problems that were focused on domain-level knowledge in subjects like science and
mathematics because the human tutor/teacher was enforced as the gold standard(Trilling &
Fadel,2009).
However, the introduction of 21st-century competencies and other recent changes to
educational practices and theories are not taken into account in this example.The value of
general skills and competencies like creativity is emphasized by the 21st-century competency
approach to education. In collaborative learning environments, today's classrooms aim to
incorporate authentic practices that draw from real world issues. The field of AIED must change
in order to remain relevant and have a greater impact(Marrone, Taddeo &Hill,2022). An
emerging interdisciplinary field called artificial intelligence in education (AIED) uses AI
technology in education to change and advance the teaching process and educational method,
design, and evaluation(Xu & Ouyang,2022).The use of AI technologies, such as chatbots,
automatic marking systems, intelligent tutoring systems, and platforms for predicting student
success, in education is known as AI in education (Chiu et al.,2023).The AIED field has witnessed
significant developments in the last twenty-five years. AIED refers to using AI application
programs or technologies in educational settings to facilitate decision-making, teaching, or
learning. AI could play various roles in educational settings. The advancement of
emergingcomputer technologies such as robot control, sensing devices, quantum computing,
wearable devices, and the popularity of 5G wireless communication technologies and mobile
has provided new opportunities andappearances for applying AI to learning and teaching
design(Nalbant,2021). With more usage of artificial intelligence in education, major
transformations can be foreseen in the education systems and its processes. Artificial
intelligence could help teachers improve personalized education for their students. Artificial
intelligence can provide access to appropriate and better learning opportunities for excluded
people and communities, people with disabilities, refugees, people out of school, and those
living in isolated communities. Research shows how effective individually tailored approaches
can be presented with the support of artificial intelligence techniques and intelligent learning
environments(Gocen & Aydemir,2021). The use of AI in education also raises concerns about
privacy, bias, and the dehumanization of the learning experience. For example, AI-based tools
can collect large amounts of personal data about students, which could be misused or stolen.
Additionally, there is a risk that AI algorithms may perpetuate biases that exist in society,
resulting in unequal educational opportunities. Moreover, some critics argue that using AI in
education could dehumanize the learning experience, where students interact more with
machines than with human teachers, resulting in a less engaging and less fulfilling learning
experience(Pazmino,2023).
Governments and education institutions are thinking of preparing learners to thrive in an
artificial intelligence-saturated future and for the increasing presence of it in all aspects of
human activity. Researches in the field of artificial intelligence mainly focuses on components of
intelligence such as learning, problem-solving, reasoning, decision making and using
language etc(Alam ,Hasan & Raza,2022).
ADVANTAGES OF AI IN EDUCATION
Access to Information: In the past, it was complicated to find the information sought
among thousands of books by visiting libraries to access information. With artificial intelligence
and technology development, it has become much easier and faster to reach the desired
information by pressing just a few buttons. Virtual assistants used on phones have provided
speedier access to the desired information with voice commands(Nalbant,2021).
Education at any time. Young people spend a lot of time on the go. They prefer doing everyday
tasks using their smartphones or tablets. AI-based applications provide an opportunity to study
in free time, spending ten or fifteen minutes. Additionally, the students can get feedback from
tutors in a real-time mode(Kuprenko,2020)
Personalization in Education: One teacher in the classroom cannot meet the expectations of all
students. Artificial intelligence can provide a teacher for every student. Students can listen to
the part they do not understand over and over again. Thus, the student can personalize their
learning(Nalbant,2021).
Helpful feedback :AI cannot solely facilitate academics and students to craft courses that are
bespoke to their wants, however it may give feedback toeach concerning the success of the
course asan entire. These sorts of AI systems enable students to urge the support they
have and for professors to search out areas wherever they'll improve instruction(Neha,2020)
Global Knowledge: We do not know the education offered in a different language can be
translated into our language with artificial intelligence systems. We can quickly get an
education and learn a language that we do not know at all. In addition, we can translate texts
written in different languages and adapt them to our language(Nalbant,2021).
24/7 without interruption: The use of chatbots can provide 24/7 (i.e. 24 h per day, seven days
per week) academic advice to students, serving as a source of information for many aspects of
university life, including timetabling and module organization(Rouhiainen,2019)
Removing Barriers: Artificial intelligence has made it much easier for special(disabled) students
to access information. The aim is to ensure the full and equal participation of special (disabled)
students in social life. Thus, disabled individuals are integrated into independent and free
energy. Visually impaired people can receive education with systems that convert text to
sound, and hearing-impaired people can receive training with systems that convert audio to
text. Individuals with walking disabilities and sick people can attend both classes and meetings
from their homes without going to school, and they do not fall behind(Nalbant,2021).
DISADVANTAGES OF AI IN EDUCATION
Technology Addiction: Students interact with each other on social platforms rather than social
interaction. Since students spend too much time with technology, they cannot allocate enough
time to their education and lessons and cannot provide motivation. Since a student spends
almost 90% of his free time in virtual environments and games, he cannot give the necessary
importance to his education. It is one of the issues that parents complain about the
most(Nalbant,2021).
Reduces Students' Capacity for Thought: The use of artificial intelligence in schools has a
biggest drawback that it reduces kids' ability to think critically and increases their reliance on
technology rather than teaching them how to complete tasks independently(Careerera,2021).
Negative Impact on Social Life: Before the development of artificial intelligence, students
were doing more social and group work. With the development of technology, work has
become more individual. Tablets and computers, which are the closest friends of the
individual, have replaced the libraries used to be visited by the class for research and
study.Now, the ability of a single individual to access information with a few keys has isolated
individuals and given them an asocial personality(Nalbant,2021).
Probability of Causing Unemployment: The fact that machines replace people by doing the
work that people do is an indicator of unemployment. As artificial intelligence develops, people
may become dependent on machines and robots. This reduces people's creativity and causes
them to be lazy individuals. If we consider unemployment in terms of education, robotic
teachers can replace ordinary teachers. Many jobs in the education sector are at risk. Unlike
humans, robots are less likely to make mistakes(Nalbant,2021).
Lack of Creativity: Although AI has been tasked with creating everything from computer code
to visual art, it lacks original thought "It can only know what it knows. It can't think outside the
box, no pun intended(Pratt,2023).
Income distribution imbalance: Some individuals can have the most advanced technologies
because their incomes are high, while people with low incomes have less developed technology
or no technology at all. This situation leads to tremendous unfair competition between
students who can and cannot access technology due to financial opportunities. Examples of this
can be seen today. During the Covid-19 pandemic, students living in rural areas could not
receive online education because they did not have internet and computers. In addition, this
situation caused them to be deprived of their right to education. In developed cities, since
students can access online education very quickly, it has caused a severe imbalance of
education levels between the two groups. As a result, the level of education decreases when
the financial situation is not good and there is no access to technology. In contrast, the level of
education increased in cities with good economic conditions and development (Nalbant,2021).
References:
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE
Access,8, 75264–75278.
https://openresearch.amsterdam/image/2021/8/11/
artificial_intelligence_in_education_a_review.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
31754500_Artificial_Intelligence_Illuminated_B_Coppin
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review
of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the
educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
336846972_Systematic_review_of_research_on_artificial_intelligence_applications_in_
higher_education_-where_are_the_educators
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On
the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business
Horizons, 62(1), 15–25.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681318301393
Gurkaynak, G., Yilmaz, I., & Haksever, G. (2016). Stifling artificial intelligence: Human
perils. Computer Law & Security Review, 32(5), 749–758.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364916300814
Delipetrev, B., Tsinaraki, C., & Kostic, U. (2020). Historical evolution of artificial
intelligence.
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC120469/
jrc120469_historical_evolution_of_ai-v1.1.pdf
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262610797/the-age-of-intelligent-machines/
https://books.google.com/books/about/Artificial_Intelligence_3E_Sie.html?
id=U9p9zgEACAAJ
Poole, D. I., Goebel, R. G., & Mackworth, A. K. (1998). Computational intelligence (Vol.
1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://books.google.com/books/about/Computational_Intelligence.html?
id=3p6KZSHjD4YC
Fitria, T. N. (2021, December). Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Education: Using AI Tools for
Teaching and Learning Process. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call for Paper STIE
AAS (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 134-147).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
357447234_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_In_Education_Using_AI_Tools_for_Teaching_and_
Learning_Process
Phani Krishna, K. V., Mani Kumar, M., & Aruna Sri, P. S. G. (2018). Student information
system and performance retrieval through dashboard. International Journal of
Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7, 682-685.
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.7.10922.
Kamisli Ozturk, Z., Erzurum Cicek, Z. I., & Ergul, Z. (2017). Sentiment analysis: An
application to Anadolu University. Acta Physica Polonica A, 132(3), 753–755.
https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.132.753.
Lodhi, P., Mishra, O., Jain, S., & Bajaj, V. (2018). StuA: An intelligent student
assistant. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 5(2),
17.
https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2018.02.008.
Hassani, H., Silva, E. S., Unger, S., TajMazinani, M., & Mac Feely, S. (2020). Artificial
intelligence (AI) or intelligence augmentation (IA): What is the future? AI, 1(2), 143–155.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
340594734_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_or_Intelligence_Augmentation_IA_What_Is_the_F
uture
Yufeia, L., Salehb, S., Jiahuic, H., & Syed, S. M. (2020). Review of the application of
artificial intelligence in education. Integration (Amsterdam), 12(8), 1-15.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
351470728_A_Review_on_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Education
Tapalova, O., & Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: AIEd for
personalised learning pathways. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(5), 639–653.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
366181078_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Education_AIEd_for_Personalised_Learning_Path
ways
Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). A review on artificial intelligence in
education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 206.
https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/12463
Van der Vorst, T., & Jelicic, N. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Can AI bring the
full potential of personalized learning to education?.
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/205222/1/van-der-Vorst-Jelicic.pdf
Encalada, W., & Sequera, J. (2017). Model to implement Virtual Computing Labs via
Cloud Computing Services. Symmetry, 9(7), 117.
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/9/7/117
Dong, Z. Y., Zhang, Y., Yip, C., Swift, S., & Beswick, K. (2020). Smart campus: Definition,
framework, technologies, and services. IET Smart Cities, 2(1), 43–54.
https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-smc.2019.0072
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John
Wiley & Sons.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
324783413_Brief_Review_of_Fadel_C_Trilling_B_2009_21st_Century_Skills_Learning_f
or_Life_in_Our_Times_San_Francisco_Jossey-Bass
Marrone, R., Taddeo, V., & Hill, G. (2022). Creativity and artificial intelligence—a student
perspective. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 65.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030065
Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: A
systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1).
https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5
Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2023). Teacher support and
student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive
Learning Environments, 1–17.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
368306653_Teacher_support_and_student_motivation_to_learn_with_Artificial_Intellig
ence_AI_based_chatbot
Alam, A., Mr., Hasan, M., Dr., & Raza, M. M., Mr. (2022). IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE (AI) ON EDUCATION: CHANGING PARADIGMS AND
APPROACHES. Towards Excellence, 281–289.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
360111685_Impact_of_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_on_Education_Changing_Paradigms_a
nd_Approaches
Garg, P. K., & Sharma, L. (2021). Artificial intelligence: Challenges and future
applications. In Artificial Intelligence (pp. 229–245). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003140351-22
Benthall, S., & Goldenfein, J. (2021, July). Artificial intelligence and the purpose of social
systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp.
3-12).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
353604504_Artificial_Intelligence_and_the_Purpose_of_Social_Systems
Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020b). Application and theory gaps during the
rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial
Intelligence, 1, 100002.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
344646326_Application_and_theory_gaps_during_the_rise_of_Artificial_Intelligence_in
_Education
Furman, J., & Seamans, R. (2019). AI and the economy. Innovation Policy and the
Economy, 19, 161–191.
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/699936
Davenport, T., & Kalakota, R. (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in
healthcare. Future Healthcare Journal, 6(2), 94–98.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31363513/
Guo, X., Shen, Z., Zhang, Y., & Wu, T. (2019). Review on the application of artificial
intelligence in smart homes. Smart Cities, 2(3), 402–420.
https://www.mdpi.com/2624-6511/2/3/25
Kemal Gokhan Nalbant. (2021). The applications and position of artificial intelligence in
health and medicine: A short review. Journal of Management and Science, 11(4), 49–54.
https://scholar.google.pt/citations?user=AYt_qXMAAAAJ&hl=fr
https://pub.towardsai.net/artificial-intelligence-in-education-benefits-challenges-and-
use-cases-db52d8921f7a
Rouhiainen, L. (2019). How AI and data could personalize higher education. Harvard
https://hbr.org/2019/10/how-ai-and-data-could-personalize-higher-education
Careerera. (2021, June 22). What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of AI in
Education? Careerera.
https://www.careerera.com/blog/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-ai-in-education
Pratt, M. K. (2023, June 16). Top advantages and disadvantages of AI. TechTarget.
https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/tip/Top-advantages-and-
disadvantages-of-AI
CHAPTER 3
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Artificial intelligence is changing the world.It is ubiquitous in almost all domains of life.We have
applied AI in all domains including education sector AI radically changing teaching and learning
beyond traditional classrooms.
Artificial intelligence technology where machines can learn and understand like human (Fitria,
2021) .AI implemented in world of education technology by this teachers can more easily and
more deeply (Fitria , 2021b) students can also learn without encoding difficulties.
Pearson (2016) affirms that most difficult part of evaluating adaptive tool is to discover where
exactly they truly adapt. There are usually three places where adapting usually happens :
CONTENT
ASSESSMENT AND
SEQUENCE.
The Pearson adaptive tool MY ENGLISH LAB (MEL). The AI Nahda School for girls in UNITED
ARAB EMIRATES, reported a very satisfactory experience with the AI tool. The English language
teacher Bridin Harmelt gave feedback that students remained interested in platforms even
during last class of the day (Kochannek and Ripley; 2014)
Chatbot have been in use for educational purposes for quite some time. These chatbots can be
categorized into those with education intentionalityand those without. Chatbots without
education intentionality are used in administrative tasks such as student guidance and
assistance. Chatbots with education intentionality are used in fostering teaching and learning .A
study guided by research question: How can Indian education sector benefit from adopting
chatbot technologies? For carrying the study an empirical research design was used.
Quantitative method was used through the data collection from surveys of some prominent
higher educational institutions using CHATBOT technology .Stratified random sampling was
used to a sample of 47 students for study. 60.9% respondents gave information that CHATBOT
was quickest communication channel followed by online chat with 19% ,telephone chat with
8.9%, face to face 6.5% this indicated CHATBOT technology is appreciated as Highest Quick
response time. On the likely predicted use cases for Chabot technology in education
institution10.6% of respondents indicated that Chabot are used for tutoring 48.9% for learning
feedback, 68.1% for paying fee, and 68.1% for being more convenient that other methods of
communication .76.6% for resolving a problem and 51.1% of student indicated that likely
predicted use cases for Chabot in education institutes is for getting quick assessment s .This
result indicated that Chabot is most likely used by students in resolving a problem as well as
convenience in Comparison to other communication method .With eight studies dealing with
artificial intelligence and mobile apps that assists post secondary student with attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder and other disabilities with academic works was conducted (N Sandu, E
Gide- 2019). Under study seven: In 2020 an survey was conducted to ask 35 students with
ADHD and 74 student without disabilities whether they use 20 recommended apps and which
ones they found helpful the survey exclude student with specific learning disorder because
study did not want to confound the finding. With technology intended for student with learning
disabilities study found both group were familiar with drop box, ever note , forest , timer, quiz
let, read and write .This study showed that students with ADHD and student without
disabilities used same app and found same apps helpful. (fichten et al.)
The rapid advancement of computing and information processing techniques has speed up the
progress and application of artificial intelligence which aims to enables to computers to
perform tasks via, simulating intelligent human behaviors , such as inferencesing , analysis and
decision making ( Duan, Edward and Dwivedi ,2019; Topol,2019) .
In past decades significant progress has been reported by researchers who have conducted
artificial studies.Through techniques such as conventional machine learning or modern deep
learning of products can provide intelligent services by inferring or behaving like humans.
Zhang (2016) states that virtual mentor (VM) is a multimedia integrated e -learning
environment that stressesinteraction,personalization, and intelligence.
Blackboard(http://www..blackboard.com/teaching-learning/learning-management/mobile-
learning-solution) is an application that is widely used in university of Europe and America.
When it comes to US and China each has a unique balance of strengths .The European union
and united states and China each have a unique balance of strength . For example, European
Union and US are nearly equal and ahead of china in term AI expertise and research skills
Companies have imitated Siri’s voice assistant mode and added the voice assistant function to
company products such as Xiami’s Xiaoai classmate, Google assistant, Baidu mapvoice.
According to survey data of China telecom terminal research and test center, the user
awareness rate of voice assistant is as high as 95.6% and use rate is 58.6% .More than half of
mobile phone users use voice assistance in daily life. Obviously, artificial intelligent voice
assistant is playing an increasingly important role. In past 60 years, the technology of voice
assistants has developed rapidly .From the combination of three robust acoustic models at
beginning, the accuracy rate of voice assistants has reached the level of human
stenographers ,reaching 95% accuracy .(Y.huang)
The rapid advancement of computing and information processing techniques has speed up the
progress and applications of artificial intelligence (AI) ,which aims to enable computers to
perform tasks via simulating intelligent human behaviours, such as inferencing, analysis and
decision making(Duan,Edwards,and Dwivedi,2019;Topol,2019) .In past decades, significant
progress has reported by researchers Who have conducted AI studies. Through techniques
such conventional machine learning or modern deep learning , an increasing number of
products can provide “intelligent service” by inferring or behaving like humans. Nowadays, AI
has been applied to various domains, such as visual and voice recognition, decision –making
and natural language processing and translation between language, in multiple forms ,such as
computer program, application, robots. For example, some robots can interact with human via
visual and audio tracking technologies(Lathuiliere, Masse , Mesejo and HORAUD,2019;
Okuno,Nakadai, and Kitano,2002) and medical systems can assist human experts in detecting
potential diseases or making judgments by analyzing a large set of data.(Li,Li, and
Niu,2020;Zhu, 2020).
With the field of AIED established for over 30 years now (O’Shea and Self ,1986), application of
AI in education have grown even the additional attention of researchers from the fields of both
computer science and education in recent years with rapid advancements in AI .It can be
foreseen that a growing number of studies will be conducted which apply AI to educational
settings as well as discuss the potential approaches of promoting and teaching AI knowledge at
all educational levels.
One of the crucial objectives of AI in education is the provision of personalized learning
guidance or supports to individual students based on their learning status , preferences, or
personal characteristics(Hwang,2014). From the perspective of precision education, which
emphasizes the need to provide Prevention and intervention practices to individual learners by
Analyzing their learning status or behaviors , enabling learning.
Security of AI system ,
Data privacy
Protection
Transparency
Accountability
Discrimination
Justification and
Responsibility.
Niemi, Hannele, and Jia Liu. "AI in learning: Intelligent digital tools and environments for
education." Journalof Pacific Rim Psychology 15 (2021):18344909211038110
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1834490921103110.
Delgado, Heloisa Orsi Koch, et al. "Artificial intelligence adaptive learning tools: the
teaching of English in focus." BELT-Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal 11.2
(2020): e38749-e38749.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2020.2.38749
Fichten, C., Jorgensen, M., Havel, A., Vo, C., & Libman, E. (2022). AI-Based and Mobile
Apps: Eight Studies Based on Post-Secondary Students' Experiences. Online
Submission, 10, 97-114.
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making
in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. International journal
of information management, 48, 63-71.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
Tang, K. Y., Chang, C. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). Trends in artificial intelligence-supported
e-learning: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis (1998–
2019). Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2134-
2152.https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1875001
Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021). AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A
systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2,
100017.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017
Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., & Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform
higher education?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
Education, 17(1), 1-12.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making
in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. International journal
of information management, 48, 63-71.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
Lathuilière, S., Massé, B., Mesejo, P., & Horaud, R. (2019). Neural network based
reinforcement learning for audio–visual gaze control in human–robot
interaction. Pattern Recognition Letters, 118, 61-
71.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2018.05.023
Okuno, H. G., Nakadai, K., & Kitano, H. (2002). Social interaction of humanoid robot
based on audio-visual tracking. In Developments in Applied Artificial Intelligence: 15th
International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial
Intelligence and Expert Systems IEA/AIE 2002 Cairns, Australia, June 17–20, 2002
Proceedings 15 (pp. 725-735). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
audio-visual-tracking-ieaaie-02.pdf (pdx.edu)
Zhu, H. (2020). Big data and artificial intelligence modeling for drug discovery. Annual
review of pharmacology and toxicology, 60, 573-589.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-
pharmtox-010919-023324
O'shea, T., & Self, J. (1986). Learning and teaching with computers: The artificial
intelligence revolution. Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference.Learning and
Teaching with Computers | Guide books (acm.org)
Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning
environments-a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning
Environments, 1(1), 1-14.http://www.slejournal.com/content/1/1/4
Kay, J. (2012). AI and education: Grand challenges. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(5), 66-
69.https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2012.92
Shum, S. J. B., & Luckin, R. (2019). Learning analytics and AI: Politics, pedagogy and
practices. British journal of educational technology, 50(6), 2785-
2793.https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10110036
CHAPTER IV
Global Rank is one of the Metrics that is calculated based on a mix of estimations of a site’s
monthly unique visitors and monthly page views across desktop and mobile traffic. The study
gauged the Global rankings of the AI based Research and Academic writing Tools. The result
showed that among the selected top 10 AI based tools “Grammarly.com” has the highest Global
Rank of 895, followed by Quillbot.com (1378) and Writesonic.com(8163). It may be because of
the versatile nature of the tool. Grammarly.com can be used across various platforms, including
web browsers, desktop applications, and even as a mobile keyboard. It helps with grammar,
spelling, punctuation, etc making it a useful tool for a wide range of writing tasks. The other
Apps are Wordtune.com (11011); ChatPDF.com (12617); Undetectable.ai (19323);
ProWritingAid.com (37007); Jenni.ai (58896); Scite.ai (64309); Frase.io (66362).Table 1 offers a
lucid picture.
2 Quillbot.com 1378
3 Writesonic.com 8163
4 Wordtune.com 11011
5 ChatPDF.com 12617
6 Undetectable.ai 29323
7 ProWritingAid.com 37007
8 Jenni.ai 58896
9 Scite.ai 64309
10 Frase.io 66362
4.1.2 Country Ranking
Country Rank is one of the Metrics that is based on a website’s ranking in its primary country.
While understanding the Country Rankings of the AI based Research and Academic writing
Tools, it was found that among the top 10 AI based tools “Grammarly.com” has the highest
Country Rank of 490, followed by Quillbot.com (1971) and Wordtune.com (6619). The other
tools are Writesonic.com (10409); ProWritingAid.com (17016); ChadPDF.com (19637);
Undetectable.ai (24475); Frase.io (37899); Jenni.ai (59800); Scite.ai (60820).Table 2 offers a
vivid picture.
2 Quillbot.com 1971
3 Writesonic.com 10409
4 Wordtune.com 6619
5 ChatPDF.com 19637
6 Undetectable.ai 24475
7 ProWritingAid.com 17016
8 Jenni.ai 59800
9 Scite.ai 60820
10 Frase.io 37899
4.1.3 Category Ranking
Category Rank shows a breakdown of traffic share organised by the relevant leading categories.
While comprehending the Category Rankings of the AI based Research and Academic writing
Tools, it was revealed that among the top 10 AI based tools “Quillbot.com” has the highest
Category Rank of 8, followed by Grammarly.com (15) and Writesonic.com (44). The other tools
include Scite.ai (168); Wordtune.com (206); Frase.io (214); Jenni.ai (367); ChatPdf.com (395);
Undetectable.ai (650); and ProWritingAid.com (1172).Table 3 provides a lucid picture.
2 Grammarly.com 15
3 Writesonic.com 44
4 Scite.ai 168
5 Wordtune.com 206
6 Frase.io 214
7 Jenni.ai 367
8 ChatPdf.com 395
9 Undetectable.ai 650
10 ProWritingAid.com 1172
4.1.4 Web Traffic
Total visit is the sum of visits to a website. This foundational metric measures website traffic
and provides insight into website’s access. A visit is counted when a visitor accesses one or
more pages during a session. While observing the Total Visits of the AI based Research and
Academic writing tools, it was gauged that among the top 10 AI based tools “Grammarly.com”
is the most visited AI based tool with 61.9M monthly visitors, followed by Quillbot.com (51.8M)
and Writesonic.com (7.6M). Other tools include Wordtune.com (5.5M); ChatPDF.com (5.4M);
Undetectable.ai (2.1M); ProWritingAid.com (2.2M); Jenni.ai (1M); Scite.ai (861.9K); and Frase.io
(632.9K). Table 4 offers a lucid picture.
Grammarly.com 61.9M
Quillbot.com 51.8M
Writesonic.com 7.6M
Wordtune.com 5.5M
ChatPDF.com 5.4M
Undetectable.ai 2.1M
ProWritingAid.com 2.2M
Jenni.ai 1M
Scite.ai 861.9K
Frase.io 632.9K
Quillbot.com 26.4K
Writesonic.com 15.8K
Wordtune.com 4.7K
ChatPDF.com 503
Undetectable.ai 589
ProWritingAid.com 11.7K
Jenni.ai 4111
Scite.ai 8579
Frase.io 2933
Quillbot.com 52.22%
Writesonic.com 45.01%
Wordtune.com 35.4%
ChatPDF.com 45.44%
Undetectable.ai 51.44%
ProWritingAid.com 64.92%
Jenni.ai 40.95%
Scite.ai 56.4%
Frase.io 36.9%
Quillbot.com 16.3K
Writesonic.com 11.6K
Wordtune.com 7K
ChatPDF.com 745
Undetectable.ai 1K
ProWritingAid.com 12.8K
Jenni.ai 1.1K
Scite.ai 2.7K
Frase.io 1.9K
Age Distribution
Name of the App
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
Grammarly.com
24.53% 30.66% 19.40% 13.11% 7.61% 4.69%
Quillbot.com
28.95% 29.39% 19.41% 11.89% 6.24% 4.12%
Writesonic.com
23.51% 32.25% 19.60% 13.24% 7.19% 4.21%
Wordtune.com
24.14% 29.57% 20.59% 13.45% 7.40% 4.85%
ChatPDF.com
26.17% 31.77% 19.82% 12.67% 6.17% 3.41%
Undetectable.ai
32.69% 29.70% 18.85% 11.03% 4.74% 2.99%
ProWritingAid.com
25.56% 28.54% 18.41% 13.35% 8.68% 5.48%
Jenni.ai
28.41% 30.79% 18.18% 13.02% 5.99% 3.60%
Scite.ai
23.27% 31.03% 19.96% 15.81% 6.46% 3.47%
Frase.io
17.31% 30.18% 18.15% 15.02% 12.26% 7.08%
Gender Distribution
Name of the App
Female Male
Grammarly.com
54.56% 45.44%
Quillbot.com
54.83% 45.17%
Writesonic.com
42.32% 57.68%
Wordtune.com
51.04% 48.96%
ChatPDF.com
47.23% 52.77%
Undetectable.ai
45.81% 54.19%
ProWritingAid.com
53.60% 46.40%
Jenni.ai
54.52% 45.48%
Scite.ai
56.99% 43.01%
Frase.io
40.08% 59.92%
Table 10 Outlines marketing channel distribution of the AI based Research and Academic
writing tools.
2 Jasper.ai 11393
3 Copy.ai 13179
4 Murf.ai 14668
5 Synthesia.io 18436
6 kickresume.com 24067
7 Rytr.me 24466
8 Beautiful.ai 24746
9 Descript.com 26264
10 Podcastle.ai 86373
4.2.2 Country Ranking
Country Rank is one of the Metrics that is based on a website’s ranking in its primary
country.While comprehending the Country Ranking of the AI based Content Creation Tools, it
was found that among the listed top 10 AI based tools “Character.ai” has the highest Country
Rank of 191, followed by Jasper.ai (9279) and Beautiful.ai (13658). The other tools are Copy.ai
(15594); Murf.ai (14086); Synthesia.io (23149); kickresume.com (24663); Rytr.me (31678);
Descript.com (18584); and podcastle.ai (67223). Table 12 offers a coherent picture.
2 Jasper.ai 9279
3 Copy.ai 15594
4 Murf.ai 14086
5 Synthesia.io 23149
6 kickresume.com 24663
7 Rytr.me 31678
8 Beautiful.ai 13658
9 Descript.com 18584
10 Podcastle.ai 67223
2 Jasper.ai 39
3 Copy.ai 119
4 Murf.ai 61
5 Synthesia.io 635
6 kickresume.com 340
7 Rytr.me 823
8 Beautiful.ai 367
9 Descript.com 491
10 Podcastle.ai 1741
Jasper.ai 4.8M
Copy.ai 4.2M
Synthesia.io 3M
Murf.ai 2.9M
Rytr.me 2.3M
Descript.com 2M
kickresume.com 1.8M
Beautiful.ai 1.5M
Podcastle.ai 609.4K
Copy.ai 56.6K
Synthesia.io 18.9K
kickresume.com 17K
Jasper.ai 13.3K
Descript.com 7.7K
Rytr.me 2.2K
Beautiful.ai 4662
Murf.ai 2586
Podcastle.ai 870
Jasper.ai 34.41%
Murf.ai 37.24%
Synthesia.io 38.85%
Copy.ai 39.8%
Beautiful.ai 45.08%
Rytr.me 46.16%
kickresume.com 46.69%
Descript.com 47.15%
Podcastle.ai 55.22%
Synthesia.io 13K
kickresume.com 12.1K
Murf.ai 9.1K
Jasper.ai 8.8K
Copy.ai 7.2K
Beautiful.ai 6.9K
Character.ai 6.4K
Podcastle.ai 4.5K
Rytr.me 1.8K
Age Distribution
Name of the App
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
Character.ai
57.02% 22.72% 11.18% 4.53% 2.67% 1.88%
Jasper.ai
17.70% 33.35% 20.36% 14.40% 8.84% 5.26%
Copy.ai
20.42% 35.01% 20.20% 12.72% 7.32% 4.34%
Murf.ai
31.18% 32.46% 17.75% 10.47% 5.06% 3.095
Synthesia.io
22.39% 34.55% 19.47% 12.84% 6.86% 3.88%
kickresume.com
22.35% 36.74% 18.70% 12.41% 6.26% 3.54%
Rytr.me
22.87% 30.98% 18.74% 14.29% 8.33% 4.78%
Beautiful.ai
19.99% 34.11% 19.53% 14.52% 7.70% 4.14%
Descript.com
24.23% 33.27% 18.46% 12.90% 7.06% 4.08%
Podcastle.ai
25.48% 29.29% 18.92% 14.50% 7.22% 4.60%
Gender Distribution
Name of the App
Female Male
Character.ai
48.93% 51.07%
Jasper.ai
45.48% 54.52%
Copy.ai
47.23% 52.77%
Murf.ai
36.79% 63.21%
Synthesia.io
38.23% 61.77%
kickresume.com 45.56% 54.44%
Rytr.me
42.97% 57.03%
Beautiful.ai
42.90% 57.10%
Descript.com
42.46% 57.54%
Podcastle.ai
41.65% 58.35%
4.2.10 Marketing channel use
Marketing channel distribution refers to the various paths or channels through which products
or services are made available to users. Marketing Channel Distribution data can help focus
Strategic efforts to acquire more traffic and build brand awareness. While understanding the
Marketing Channel Distribution of the AI based Content Creation Tools, it was revealed that the
traffic in all the listed tools is driven from the Direct channel of marketing, followed by Organic
search; Paid search; Referrals; Social; Mail; and Display channels of marketing.Table 20 offers a
lucid picture.
Global Rank is one of the Metrics that is calculatedbased on a mix of estimations of a site’s
monthly unique visitors and monthly page views across desktop and mobile
traffic.Theexploration judgedthe Global rankings of the AI based Tools for Specially Abled
Persons, it was revealed that among the listed top 10 AI based tools “Quizlet.com” has the
highest Global Rank of 548, followed by Evernote.com (2377) and elevenlabs.io (4718). The
other tools are Speechify.com (7675); Otter.ai (13474); narakeet.com (19423);
Naturalreaders.com (21195); typecast.ai (66943); Bemyeyes.com (70863); and Aurisai.io
(146616). Table 21 rendersa clear picture.
2 Evernote.com 2377
3 elevenlabs.io 4718
4 Speechify.com 7675
5 Otter.ai 13474
6 Aurisai.io 146616
7 narakeet.com 19423
8 Naturalreaders.com 21195
9 typecast.ai 66943
10 Bemyeyes.com 70863
4.3.2 Country Ranking
Country Rank is one of the Metrics that is based on a website’s ranking in its primary country.
While ascertaining the Country Rankings of the AI based Tools for Specially Abled Persons, it
was observed that among the other AI based tools “Quizlet.com”has the highest Country Rank
of 172, followed by Evernote.com(1951) and typecast.ai (2915). The other tools are
Speechify.com (4491); Otter.ai (5125); elevenlabs.io (5198); Bemyeyes.com (10133);
Naturalreaders.com (12970); narakeet.com (38114); and Aurisai.io (52210). Table 22 offers a
lucid picture.
3 elevenlabs.io 5198
4 Speechify.com 4491
5 Otter.ai 5125
6 Aurisai.io 52210
7 narakeet.com 38114
8 Naturalreaders.com 12970
9 typecast.ai 2915
10 Bemyeyes.com 10133
4.3.3 Category Ranking
Category Rank shows a breakdown of traffic share organized by the relevant leading categories.
The study assessed the Category Rankings of the AI based Tools for Specially Abled Persons. It
was found that among the other top 10 AI based tools “Quizlet.com”has the highest Category
Rank of 2, followed by Evernote.com (55) and elevenlabs.io (120). The other tools are
Speechify.com (137); Otter.ai (161); typecast.ai (185); Naturalreaders.com (280);
Bemyeyes.com (294); Aurisai.io (727); and narakeet.com (987). Table 23 offers a lucid picture.
2 Evernote.com 55
3 elevenlabs.io 120
4 Speechify.com 137
5 Otter.ai 161
6 Aurisai.io 727
7 narakeet.com 987
8 Naturalreaders.com 280
9 typecast.ai 185
10 Bemyeyes.com 294
4.3.4 Virtual Audience.
Total visit is the sum of visits to a website. This foundational metric measures website traffic
and provides insight into website’s access. A visit is counted when a visitor accesses one or
more pages during a session. While assessing the Total Visits of theTools for Specially Abled
Persons, it was uncovered that among the top 10 tools “Quizlet.com”is the most visited AI
based tool with 78.5M visitors monthly, followed by Evernote.com (23.1M)and elevenlabs.io
(11.8M). Other tools include Speechify.com (6.9M); Otter.ai (4.8M); Naturalreaders.com (3.7M);
narakeet.com (2.5M); typecast.ai (685.1K); Bemyeyes.com (405K); and Aurisai.io (321K). Table
24 offers a lucid picture.
Evernote.com 23.1M
elevenlabs.io 11.8M
Speechify.com 6.9M
Otter.ai 4.8M
Aurisai.io 321K
narakeet.com 2.5M
Naturalreaders.com 3.7M
typecast.ai 685.1K
Bemyeyes.com 405K
4.3.5 Follower Count.
Total Followers is the number of users who follow a specific Social Media account. The various
Social Networking Sites include Meta (formerly named Facebook); Instagram; X (formerly
known as Twitter); LinkedIn; etc. The research measured the entire Fan base of the AI based
Tools for Special-need individuals, taken from various Social Networking Sites like Facebook,
Instagram, X, etc. the result shows that among the listed AI based tools “Evernote.com”tops the
list with 396.8K followers, followed by Bemyeyes.com (121K) and Quizlet.com(41.9K). The other
tools are elevenlabs.io (38.5K); Otter.ai (14.5K); typecast.ai (4.8K); Speechify.com (1958);
narakeet.com (889); Naturalreaders.com (293); and Aurisai.io (70). Table 25 provides a vivid
picture.
Evernote.com 396.8K
elevenlabs.io 38.5K
Speechify.com 1958
Otter.ai 14.5K
Aurisai.io 70
narakeet.com 889
Naturalreaders.com 293
typecast.ai 4.8K
Bemyeyes.com 121K
4.3.6 Bounce Rate.
Bounce Rateis a metric used in web analytics to measure the percentage of visitors to a website
who navigate away from the site after viewing only one page. A highest bounce rate can
indicate that visitors are not engaging with the content or finding what they are looking for,
while a lower bounce rate suggests that visitors are exploring the site further. The study
measured the Bounce Rate of the AI based Tools for Specially Abled Persons. The result found
that among the other AI based tools, “Bemyeyes.com”has the highest Bounce Rate of
69.25%while “Speechify.com”has the lowest Bounce Rate of 29.87%. The other tools are
Quizlet.com (42.33%); Evernote.com (35.73%); elevenlabs.io (38.15%); Otter.ai (34.79%);
Aurisai.io (31.73%); narakeet.com (32.09%); Naturalreaders.com (64.12%); and typecast.ai
(46.8%). Table 26 offers a lucid picture.
Evernote.com 35.73%
elevenlabs.io 38.15%
Speechify.com 29.87%
Otter.ai 34.79%
Aurisai.io 31.73%
narakeet.com 32.09%
Naturalreaders.com 64.12%
typecast.ai 46.8%
Bemyeyes.com 69.25%
4.3.7Keywords Used
Keywords are specific words or phrases that represent the main topics, themes or ideas within
content, particularly in the context or online search and digital marketing. Keywords are crucial
for search engine optimization (SEO) because search engines like Google use them to determine
the relevance of webpage to a user’s search query. The study calculated the Total number of
Keywords of the AI based Tools for specially abled persons. The result shows that “Quizlet.com”
has the highest number of Keywords i.e., 19.5K, followed by Speechify.com having 18.2K
Keywords and Evernote.com with 13.4K Keywords. Other tools include elevenlabs.io (4.3K);
Otter.ai (3.6K); Aurisai.io (1.4K); narakeet.com (9.1K); Naturalreaders.com (3.9K); typecast.ai
(3.6K); and Bemyeyes.com (863). Table 27 offers a lucid picture.
Evernote.com 13.4K
elevenlabs.io 4.3K
Speechify.com 18.2K
Otter.ai 3.6K
Aurisai.io 1.4K
narakeet.com 9.1K
Naturalreaders.com 3.9K
typecast.ai 3.6K
Bemyeyes.com 863
4.3.8 Audience Demographics
Age distribution is the proportionate number of people in different age groups in a population.
It is also known as Age Composition. Here, Age distribution of the users is taken under 6 age
groups. The six groups are 18-24 yrs; 25-34 yrs; 35-44yrs; 45-54 yrs; 55-64yrs; and 65+ yrs.The
study gauged the Age Distribution of the AI based Tools for Specially Abled Persons. The
outcome shows that 5 out of 10 AI based tools are mostly used by the people belonging to the
age group of 18-24 yrs.The 5 Apps are Quizlet.com; Speechify.com; narakeet.com;
Naturalreaders.com; and typecast.ai. While other 5 AI based App i.e Evernote.com;
elevenlabs.io ; Otter.ai; Aurisai.io; and Bemyeyes.com, are mostly used by the people belonging
to the age group of 25-34 yrs. It indicates that the people of age groups 18-24 yrs and 25-34 yrs
are much familiar with the usage of the AI based Tools. It may be because of the young people
being much Tech-savvy in nature. Table 28 offers a lucid picture.
Age Distribution
Name of the App
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
Quizlet.com 38.22% 25.11% 17.19% 10.52% 5.29% 3.67%
Evernote.com 15.04% 28.39% 22.41% 16.52% 11.29% 6.35%
elevenlabs.io 32.23% 33.46% 17.78% 9.27% 4.54% 2.71%
Speechify.com 30.21% 29.54% 19.22% 11.06% 6.13% 3.84%
Otter.ai 12.03% 30.89% 19.71% 17.71% 13.03% 6.63%
Aurisai.io 31.33% 31.79% 16.59% 11.83% 4.90% 3.55%
narakeet.com 33.29% 30.64% 16.87% 10.37% 5.40% 3.42%
Naturalreaders.com 32.79% 30.57% 16.86% 10.21% 5.78% 3.78%
typecast.ai 31.35% 28.75% 17.90% 12.10% 6.80% 3.10%
Bemyeyes.com 17.42% 38.54% 17.25% 13.17% 8.18% 5.43%
Gender Distribution
Name of the App
Female Male
Quizlet.com 59.67% 40.33%
Evernote.com 56.05% 43.95%
elevenlabs.io 34.86% 65.14%
Speechify.com 46.98% 53.02%
Otter.ai 54.59% 45.41%
Aurisai.io 37.05% 62.95%
narakeet.com 38.26% 61.74%
Naturalreaders.com 45.99% 54.01%
typecast.ai 29.57% 70.43%
Bemyeyes.com 34.04% 65.96% 4.3.10 Marketing
channel Use
Table 30 communicates Marketing channel Distribution of the AI based tools for
Persons with Disability.
Further research is needed to explore how AI-driven tools can be effectively integrated into
teaching and learning activities. Research can also investigate how to address ethical and other
concerns associated with AI in education. This evolution not only enhances current practice but
also opens avenues for innovative educational approaches, shaping a future where AI
contributes significantly to the evolution of learning environments.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Joyce, J. Lu., & Harris, L. A. (2018, August 1). Artificial intelligence (AI) and education.
UNT Digital Library. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1228526/
Russell, S. J., Norvig, P., & Davis, E. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach.
Prentice Hall.https://ds.amu.edu.et/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/10406/
artificial%20intelligence%20-%20a%20modern%20approach%20%283rd%2C
%202009%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Stone, P., Brooks, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Calo, R., Etzioni, O., Hager, G., Hirschberg, J.,
Kalyanakrishnan, S., Kamar, E., Kraus, S., Leyton-Brown, K., Parkes, D., Press, W.,
Saxenian, A., Shah, J., Tambe, M., & Teller, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Life in
2030: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.06318
Luckin, R. (2016, February 22). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in
Education.https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1475756/
McNeill, Samuell. (2018). Artificial intelligence in the classroom. (2019, January 11).
Microsoft EDU | Education Stories.
https://edublog.microsoft.com/en-au/2019/01/artificial-intelligence-in-the-classroom/
Borge, N. (2016). White paper - Artificial Intelligence to Improve Education / Learning
Challenges.International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Innovative Technology
(IJAEIT), 2(6), 10-13.http://ijaeit.com/Paper/Index/47
Arrigo, M. (2005). E-learning accessibility for blind students. Recent Research
Developments in Learning Technologies, 8(2), 1-5.http://medialt.no/pub/utin/Blind
%20students.pdf
UNESCO. (2013). UNESCO global report: Opening New Avenues for Empowerment:
ICTs to Access Information and Knowledge for Persons with Disabilities” global
summary report. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000219767
Microsoft 2017 annual report. (2017). Letter to
Shareholders.https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar17/index.html
Laabidi, M., Jemni, M., Ayed, L. J. B., Brahim, H. B., & Jemaa, A. B. (2014).
Learning technologies for people with disabilities. Journal of King Saud
University-Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 29-
45.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.005
World Health Organization. (2011).World Report on Disability.
https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/sensory-functions-disability-
and-rehabilitation/world-report-on-disability
White Paper on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Official publication and
Gazetting of the White Paper on Rights of Persons with disabilities.(2016).The
Department of Social Development.
https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201603/39792gon230.pdf
Lynch, M. (2018, April 24). How Artificial Intelligence is Improving Assistive
Technology. The Tech Edvocate. https://www.thetechedvocate.org/how-artificial-
intelligence-is-improving-assistive-technology/
Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., Read, R., Wood, R., Cuayáhuitl, H., Kiefer, B., ... & Humbert, R.
(2012). Multimodal child-robot interaction: Building social bonds. Journal of Human-
Robot Interaction, 1(2).http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/22210
Sanghvi, J., Castellano, G., Leite, I., Pereira, A., McOwan, P. W., & Paiva, A.
(2011, March). Automatic analysis of affective postures and body motion to
detect engagement with a game companion. In Proceedings of the 6th
international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 305-312).
https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1957656.1957781
Kim, J. C., Azzi, P., Jeon, M., Howard, A. M., & Park, C. H. (2017, June). Audio-based
emotion estimation for interactive robotic therapy for children with autism spectrum
disorder. In 2017 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient
Intelligence (URAI) (pp. 39-44). IEEE.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7992881/
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE
Access,8, 75264–75278.
https://openresearch.amsterdam/image/2021/8/11/
artificial_intelligence_in_education_a_review.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
31754500_Artificial_Intelligence_Illuminated_B_Coppin
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of
research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the
educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
336846972_Systematic_review_of_research_on_artificial_intelligence_applications_in_higher_e
ducation_-where_are_the_educators
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On
the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business
Horizons, 62(1), 15–25.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681318301393
Gurkaynak, G., Yilmaz, I., & Haksever, G. (2016). Stifling artificial intelligence: Human
perils. Computer Law & Security Review, 32(5), 749–758.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364916300814
Delipetrev, B., Tsinaraki, C., & Kostic, U. (2020). Historical evolution of artificial
intelligence.
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC120469/
jrc120469_historical_evolution_of_ai-v1.1.pdf
Haugeland, J. (1989). Artificial intelligence: The very idea. MIT Press.
https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4347/Artificial-IntelligenceThe-Very-Idea
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262610797/the-age-of-intelligent-machines/
https://books.google.com/books/about/Artificial_Intelligence_3E_Sie.html?
id=U9p9zgEACAAJ
Poole, D. I., Goebel, R. G., & Mackworth, A. K. (1998). Computational intelligence (Vol.
1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://books.google.com/books/about/Computational_Intelligence.html?
id=3p6KZSHjD4YC
Winston, P. H. (1992). Artificial intelligence. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co.,
Inc..
https://books.google.com/books/about/Artificial_Intelligence.html?id=b4owngEACAAJ
Fitria, T. N. (2021, December). Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Education: Using AI Tools for
Teaching and Learning Process. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call for Paper STIE
AAS (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 134-147).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
357447234_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_In_Education_Using_AI_Tools_for_Teaching_an
d_Learning_Process
Phani Krishna, K. V., Mani Kumar, M., & Aruna Sri, P. S. G. (2018). Student information
system and performance retrieval through dashboard. International Journal of
Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7, 682-685.
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.7.10922.
Kamisli Ozturk, Z., Erzurum Cicek, Z. I., & Ergul, Z. (2017). Sentiment analysis: An
application to Anadolu University. Acta Physica Polonica A, 132(3), 753–
755.https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.132.753.
Lodhi, P., Mishra, O., Jain, S., & Bajaj, V. (2018). StuA: An intelligent student
assistant. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 5(2),
17.
https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2018.02.008.
Hassani, H., Silva, E. S., Unger, S., TajMazinani, M., & Mac Feely, S. (2020). Artificial
intelligence (AI) or intelligence augmentation (IA): What is the future? AI, 1(2), 143–155.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
340594734_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_or_Intelligence_Augmentation_IA_What_Is_the_
Future
Yufeia, L., Salehb, S., Jiahuic, H., & Syed, S. M. (2020). Review of the application of
artificial intelligence in education. Integration (Amsterdam), 12(8), 1-15.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
351470728_A_Review_on_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Education
Tapalova, O., & Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: AIEd for
personalised learning pathways. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(5), 639–653.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
366181078_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Education_AIEd_for_Personalised_Learning_Path
ways
Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). A review on artificial intelligence in
education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 206.
https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/12463
van der Vorst, T., & Jelicic, N. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Can AI bring
the full potential of personalized learning to education?.
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/205222/1/van-der-Vorst-Jelicic.pdf
Encalada, W., & Sequera, J. (2017). Model to implement Virtual Computing Labs via
Cloud Computing Services. Symmetry, 9(7), 117.
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/9/7/117
Dong, Z. Y., Zhang, Y., Yip, C., Swift, S., & Beswick, K. (2020). Smart campus: Definition,
framework, technologies, and services. IET Smart Cities, 2(1), 43–54.
https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-smc.2019.0072
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John
Wiley & Sons.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
324783413_Brief_Review_of_Fadel_C_Trilling_B_2009_21st_Century_Skills_Learning_for_Lif
e_in_Our_Times_San_Francisco_Jossey-Bass
Marrone, R., Taddeo, V., & Hill, G. (2022). Creativity and artificial intelligence—a student
perspective. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 65.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030065
Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: A
systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1).
https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5
Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2023). Teacher support and
student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive
Learning Environments, 1–17.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
368306653_Teacher_support_and_student_motivation_to_learn_with_Artificial_Intellig
ence_AI_based_chatbot
Gocen, A., & Aydemir, F. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education and schools. Research
on Education and Media, 12(1), 13–21.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
352044231_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Education_and_Schools
Alam, A., Mr., Hasan, M., Dr., & Raza, M. M., Mr. (2022). IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE (AI) ON EDUCATION: CHANGING PARADIGMS AND
APPROACHES. Towards Excellence, 281–289.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
360111685_Impact_of_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_on_Education_Changing_Paradigms_a
nd_Approaches
Garg, P. K., & Sharma, L. (2021). Artificial intelligence: Challenges and future applications.
In Artificial Intelligence (pp. 229–245). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003140351-22
Benthall, S., & Goldenfein, J. (2021, July). Artificial intelligence and the purpose of
social systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and
Society (pp. 3-12).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
353604504_Artificial_Intelligence_and_the_Purpose_of_Social_Systems
Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020b). Application and theory gaps during the
rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial
Intelligence, 1, 100002.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
344646326_Application_and_theory_gaps_during_the_rise_of_Artificial_Intelligence_in
_Education
Furman, J., & Seamans, R. (2019). AI and the economy. Innovation Policy and the
Economy, 19, 161–191.
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/699936
Davenport, T., & Kalakota, R. (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in
healthcare. Future Healthcare Journal, 6(2), 94–98.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31363513/
Guo, X., Shen, Z., Zhang, Y., & Wu, T. (2019). Review on the application of artificial
intelligence in smart homes. Smart Cities, 2(3), 402–420.
https://www.mdpi.com/2624-6511/2/3/25
Bansla, N. Archana Bansla. International Journal of Applied Engineering
Research, 7(11), 2012.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
358634571_The_Importance_of_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Education_A_short_review
Kemal Gokhan Nalbant. (2021). The applications and position of artificial intelligence in
health and medicine: A short review. Journal of Management and Science, 11(4), 49–54.
https://scholar.google.pt/citations?user=AYt_qXMAAAAJ&hl=fr
https://pub.towardsai.net/artificial-intelligence-in-education-benefits-challenges-and-use-
cases-db52d8921f7a
Rouhiainen, L. (2019). How AI and data could personalize higher education. Harvard
https://hbr.org/2019/10/how-ai-and-data-could-personalize-higher-education
Careerera. (2021, June 22). What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of AI in
Education? Careerera.
https://www.careerera.com/blog/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-ai-in-education
Pratt, M. K. (2023, June 16). Top advantages and disadvantages of AI. TechTarget.
https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/tip/Top-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-AI
Niemi, Hannele, and Jia Liu. "AI in learning: Intelligent digital tools and environments for
education." Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology 15 (2021): 18344909211038110
Delgado, Heloisa Orsi Koch, et al. "Artificial intelligence adaptive learning tools: the
teaching of English in focus." BELT-Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal 11.2
(2020): e38749-e38749.
Sandu, Nitirajsingh, and Ergun Gide. "Adoption of AI-Chatbots to enhance student
learning experience in higher education in India." 2019 18th International Conference on
Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET). IEEE, 2019.
Fichten, C., Jorgensen, M., Havel, A., Vo, C., & Libman, E. (2022). AI-Based and Mobile
Apps: Eight Studies Based on Post-Secondary Students' Experiences. Online
Submission, 10, 97-114.
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making
in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. International journal
of information management, 48, 63-71.
T.N – Fitra,(2021). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN EDUCATION: Using AI tools for
learning and teaching process.
Huang, Y. Research on the Development of Voice Assistants in the Era of Artificial
Intelligence. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 155, p. 03019). EDP Sciences..
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review
of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the
educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1),
1-27.
Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the
rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial
Intelligence, 1, 100002.
Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M. P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M.
(2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric study on its impact in
the scientific literature. Education Sciences, 9(1), 51.
Tang, K. Y., Chang, C. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). Trends in artificial intelligence-supported
e-learning: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis (1998–
2019). Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2134-2152.
Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021). AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A
systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2,
100017.
Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., & Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform
higher education?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
Education, 17(1), 1-12.
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making
in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. International journal
of information management, 48, 63-71.
Lathuilière, S., Massé, B., Mesejo, P., & Horaud, R. (2019). Neural network based
reinforcement learning for audio–visual gaze control in human–robot
interaction. Pattern Recognition Letters, 118, 61-71.
Okuno, H. G., Nakadai, K., & Kitano, H. (2002). Social interaction of humanoid robot
based on audio-visual tracking. In Developments in Applied Artificial Intelligence: 15th
International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial
Intelligence and Expert Systems IEA/AIE 2002 Cairns, Australia, June 17–20, 2002
Proceedings 15 (pp. 725-735). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Zhu, H. (2020). Big data and artificial intelligence modeling for drug discovery. Annual
review of pharmacology and toxicology, 60, 573-589.
O'shea, T., & Self, J. (1986). Learning and teaching with computers: The artificial
intelligence revolution. Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference.
Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning
environments-a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning
Environments, 1(1), 1-14.
Hart, S. A. (2016). Precision education initiative: Moving toward personalized
education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(4), 209-211.
Kay, J. (2012). AI and education: Grand challenges. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(5), 66-69.
Shum, S. J. B., & Luckin, R. (2019). Learning analytics and AI: Politics, pedagogy and
practices. British journal of educational technology, 50(6), 2785-2793.
ANNEXURE I